Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SLOVAKIA · LSSIP Year 2016 Slovakia 5 Released Issue...

Year 2016 - Level 1

EUROCONTROL

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SLOVAKIA

LSSIP Year 2016 Slovakia Released Issue

Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for the Slovak Republic

Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/135

Date of Edition 08/05/2017

LSSIP Focal Point A.Lamprecht - [email protected]

LSSIP Contact Person A. Dybowska - [email protected]

Status Released

Intended for Agency Stakeholders

Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2016

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-plan

Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2015

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-report

European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

National AIP http://aim.lps.sk/web/?fn=1&lng=sk

FAB Performance Plan Latest FABCE Performance Plan V2.0 For details contact: Mr Matej Eljon [email protected]


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2016 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2016 (also known as the ESSIP Plan).


CONTENTS

Chapter 1 National ATM Environment .................................................................... 5 1.1. Geographical Scope ....................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1. International Membership ............................................................................................... 5 1.1.2. Geographical description of the FIR(s) ........................................................................... 5 1.1.3. Airspace Classification and Organisation ....................................................................... 7 1.2. National Stakeholders .................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1. Civil Regulator(s) ............................................................................................................ 9 1.2.2. ANSPs .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.3. Airports ......................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.4. Military Authorities ........................................................................................................ 15

Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................. 18 2.1. Evolution of traffic in the Slovak Republic .................................................................... 18 2.2. BRATISLAVA ACC ....................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1. Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2012 - 2021 ........................................................... 19 2.2.2. Performance summer 2016 .......................................................................................... 19 2.2.3. Planning Period 2017 - 2021 ........................................................................................ 20

Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations ........... 22

Chapter 4 National Projects .................................................................................. 23

Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination ........................................................................ 26 5.1. FAB Co-ordination ........................................................................................................ 26 5.2. FAB Projects ................................................................................................................. 29 5.3. Regional cooperation ................................................................................................... 37 5.3.1. Regional Projects ......................................................................................................... 37

Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress .................................................... 43 6.1. State View .................................................................................................................... 43 6.1.1. Overall Objective Implementation ................................................................................ 43 6.1.2. Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ............................................................... 44 6.1.3. ICAO ASBU Implementation ........................................................................................ 48 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress .............................................................. 49 6.3. Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ........................................................ 64

Annexes

LSSIP Year 2016 Slovakia 1 Released Issue

10; 34%

10; 33%

4; 13%

3; 10%

2; 7%1; 3% Completed

Ongoing

Planned

Late

No Plan

Not Applicable

Missing Data

Undefined

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

Slovak airspace is one of the most significant air corridors with most traffic flying in its western part. All five sectors were activated last year and we saw increased number of movements compared to the previous year. The ´average delay per one movement´ indicator was stable and ensured the flawless operation.

The Slovak Republic as an EU member is applying all ATM regulations adopted by EU and related legal acts prepared by EASA. No important changes have occurred during the past year.

Traffic and Capacity

Calculation of the Slovak capacity target is based on the latest STATFOR forecast of annual traffic growth and planned technical improvements of the ATM system. Delay targets correspond to an objective capacity increase during RP2

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Value Value Value Value Value

0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10

Bratislava/M. R. ŠTEFÁNIK Airport has never experienced and is not expected to experience in the future ATFM arrival delay, therefore the national target is set to 0 min.

Implementation Objectives Overview

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

The level of ESSIP Objective implementation is adequate, many Objectives have been implemented in accordance to the ESSIP Plan, the others are planned to be implemented in time. There are some minor Objectives, which are either considered as not applicable or applicable with delay. The main reason for Not applicable Objectives is low traffic density, which does not justify an automation.


The justification for delay of three Objectives is below:

Implementation of the Objectives ITY-ADQ is late due to complexity of the Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010. The working group was established, which is preparing the methodology guidance on meeting the requirements of the ADQ Regulation, which shall act as a national methodology applicable in the area of civil aviation of the Slovak Republic. The web based application AIS Web Portal will be launched in Q3 2017.

With regard to objectives ITY-AGVCS2 activities related to extension of 8,33 channel spacing below FL 195 are in progress. Working group for safety case study has been established and Functional Hazard Assessment phase (FHA) has been finished. Next phase (PSSA) is envisaged to be completed in 2017. Stakeholders will be kept informed.

Fulfilment of ITY-AGDL objective has been incorporated into the specification of requirements on the E2000 system upgrade. The project for E2000 system upgrade has been postponed due to procurement issues.

Progress per SESAR Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives – AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 – are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.

The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011-2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.

SESAR Baseline Implementation

2010 2019

72%

PCP Implementation

2015 2023

15%


Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6.1.3.

Block 0 2010 2018

77%

n/a

34% 6%

SESARBaseli

ne

90%

52%

100%

2%

74%

SESARBaseli

ne

SESARBaseli

ne

SESARBaseli

ne

PCP PCP PCP PCP

Optimised ATM Network Services

Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing

Airport Operations

Enabling Aviation Infrastructure


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2015 which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

Chapter 4 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter;

Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;

Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high-level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Chapter 6.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016.

The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


Chapter 1 National ATM Environment

1.1. Geographical Scope

1.1.1. International Membership

Slovak Republic is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC June 1991

ITU February 1993

EUROCONTROL 1997

European Union 2004

EASA May 2004

ICAO 1947

NATO March 2004

1.1.2. Geographical description of the FIR(s)

BRATISLAVA FIR is defined as airspace over the Slovak Republic within the state boundary.

BRATISLAVA FIR consists of Controlled Airspace and Uncontrolled Airspace.

Provision of service: H24

Controlled Airspace:

Bratislava CTA

- Airspace outside CTR/TMA from 8 000 ft AMSL (10 000 ft AMSL within lateral limits of TMA 4 Poprad) to FL 660; ATS provided by Area Control Centre

- Bratislava CTA can be divided laterally and/or vertically up to 5 controlling sectors

- Class of airspace: C

CTR/TMA (see enclosed map)

- Class of airspace C or D, ATS provided by appropriate approach and/or tower units

Uncontrolled Airspace:

- Airspace outside CTR/TMA from GND to 8 000 ft AMSL (10 000 ft AMSL within lateral limits of TMA 4 Poprad), FIS provided by Flight Information Centre

- Class of Airspace: G

In terms of route structure, BRATISLAVA FIR is divided to Lower Airspace (GND/FL 245) and Upper Airspace (FL 245/UNL).


The following map shows the geographical situation of the Slovak airspace.


1.1.3. Airspace Classification and Organisation


Outside OPR HR of Piešťany TWR the airspace classification of Piešťany CTR and TMA is changed from D to G.

Outside OPR HR of Tatry TWR the airspace classification of Tatry CTR and Poprad TMA 1 and TMA 2 is changed from D to G and the airspace classification of Poprad TMA 3 and TMA 4 is changed from D to C.

Outside OPR HR of Žilina TWR the airspace classification of Žilina CTR and TMAs up to 8 000 ft is changed from D to G, above that level from D to C.

Outside OPR HR of Sliač APP/TWR the airspace of Sliač CTR and TMA becomes restricted/temporary reserved airspace.

1.2. National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in the Slovak Republic are the following:

The Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic (MoT SK);

The Transport Authority (TA) in its independent function of National Supervisory Authority (NSA SK) in accordance with EU legislation and Aviation Act of the Slovak Republic;

Aviation and Maritime Investigation Authority (AMIA);

Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik, v skratke LPS SR, š. p., a state enterprise, designated for provision of air navigation services;

Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ), designated for provision of Meteorological services; The Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic - Air Force of the Slovak Republic (MoD SK- VzS OS SR) designated for provision of ATS at Sliač Airport;

Letisko M. R. Štefánika – Airport Bratislava, a.s. (BTS);

The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) of the Ministry of Defence.

Note: The Functions of National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 is performed by the following authorities1:

The Transport Authority - section of air navigation services and aerodromes.

Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic, Directorate General of the Civil Aviation.

1 http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/single_european_sky/doc/nsas‐in‐the‐context‐of‐ses.pdf


Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. More detailed charts are presented in Annex B.

1.2.1. Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

Civil Aviation in the Slovak Republic is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic (MoT SK).

The regulatory entity under the structure of MoT SK in Civil Aviation is the Directorate General of Civil Aviation. It is (among other functions in civil aviation) responsible for:

state transport policy in Civil Aviation;

representing state in international civil aviation organisations;

monitoring of state supervision in Civil Aviation;

legislation and regulatory process;

designation of Air Navigation Services Providers.

The Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic (MoD SK) is responsible for the process of national military aviation legislation and regulation of military aviation in general. MoD SK is responsible for handling of military air traffic in reserved areas for state military aircraft (licensing of military ATCOs). The Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic for these purposes delegated certain responsibilities to the Military Aviation Authority (MAA).

The Ministry of Interior of the Slovak Republic is responsible for regulation of state aircraft other than military aircraft.


The Transport Authority (TA) has been established as a legal successor of the Civil Aviation Authority of the Slovak Republic with effect from 1st of January, 2014. The TA is an independent institution represents the Slovak Republic at EASA, performs some tasks on behalf of European Aviation Safety Agency and fulfils the role of National Supervision Authority for SES purposes (NSA). The TA is responsible for but not limited to:

TA certification of Air Navigation Services Providers,

certification of systems used or intended to use by Air Traffic Services Providers, Aeronautical Telecommunication Services Providers, Aeronautical Information Services Providers and Meteorological Services Providers,

licensing of Air Traffic Services Personnel,

performance monitoring of Air Navigation Services,

supervision of Air Navigation Services.

MoT SK acts as an economic and market regulator in the civil aviation.

In general, the MoT SK is responsible for preparation, transposition and implementation of legal rules. The TA acts as advisory body in this process, as well as, according to the Civil Aviation Act, it has a legislative initiative.

The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible

Legal Basis

Rule-making MoT SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act (143/1998 as amended)

Safety Oversight TA (NSA) EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

MoT SK

TA

EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Airspace MoT SK and MoD SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Economic MoT SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Environment MoT SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Security MoT SK, TA EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Accident investigation AMIA EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements: TA is acting as certifying authority and MoT SK as designating authority. Enforcement actions are linked accordingly to scope of responsibility.

Airspace: Major changes of Airspace are associated with mutual co-ordination/approval of MoT SK and MoD SK.

Security: MoT SK is responsible for international security activity. TA is responsible for assessment of security programmes, supervision of organizations which are obligated to have security processes in place, assessment of background check of individuals. Detailed description of tasks and responsibilities are published in National Aviation Security Programme which is published as special Attachment to national version ICAO Annex 17.


Administration in the Civil Aviation of Slovak Republic

MoT SK and TA are institutionally separated from ANSPs.

In general the MoT SK is responsible for preparation, transposition and implementation of legal rules. The TA acts as advisory body in this process, as well as, according to the Civil Aviation Act, it has a legislative initiative and it adopts manuals and procedures for executive activities. TA main responsibility is safety and security oversight of ANSPs.

For ATM safety regulation, the responsible body is MoT SK (Directorate General of Civil Aviation) and for executive manuals and procedures, the responsible body is TA along with deep responsibility of safety oversight and licensing procedures.

MoT SK Annual Report published:

Y http://www.telecom.gov.sk/index/open_file.php?file=vyrocnespravy/2015/vs_2015.pdf

TA Transport Authority Y http://nsat.sk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/V%C3%BDro%C4%8Dn%C3%A1-spr%C3%A1va-D%C3%9A-za-2015.pdf

An organisational Chart is shown in Annex B.

Web addresses:

MoT SK: www.mindop.sk

TA: www.nsat.sk

1.2.2. ANSPs

Service provided

LPS SR, š. p. Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik, v skratke LPS SR, š. p., (LPS) has been entrustedwith provision of air navigation services under the Slovak Laws since January 1993 and designated as ANSP in 2006. LPS, state enterprise, is acting as a commercial entity.

The Supervisory Board of LPS comprises of members who are selected by the MoT SK and members elected by LPS employees, to maintain the majority of the State representation.

The mission of LPS is in the following domains:

Air Traffic Services Operations;

Aeronautical Telecommunication Services;

ATS Infrastructure Operation, Maintenance, and Development;

Aeronautical Information Management, including Aeronautical Information Services;

Air Traffic Services Safety and Quality;

Search and rescue Co-ordination;

Administrative and Finance.


Name of the ANSP: Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik, v skratke LPS SR, š. p. (LPS)

Governance: State enterprise Ownership: Slovak Republic

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET N

ATCO training Y

Others N/A

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y HU

Annual Report published: Y http://www.lps.sk/docs/vyrsprava2014.pdf

LPS website: www.lps.sk


Slovenský hydrometeorologický ústav (SHMÚ)

Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ) has been entrusted for provision of meteorological services under the Slovak Laws since January 1993 and being designated as Met Service Provider in 2006 and re-designated in 2013. SHMÚ is state subsidised organization operating under the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic.

Name of the ANSP: Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ)

Governance: State organisation Ownership: Slovak Republic


ATC en-route N

ATC approach N

ATC Aerodrome(s) N

AIS N

CNS N

MET Y

ATCO training N/A

Others N/A


Provision of services in other State(s):

N


Annual Report published: Y http://www.shmu.sk/sk/?page=1714,

More detailed annual report is available for NSA

SHMU website: www.shmu.sk

MoD - Air Force of the Slovak Republic (MoD - VzS OS SR)

MoT re-designated MoD - VzS OS SR for provision of air navigation services in June 2013. VzS OS SR is providing ANS at Sliač Airport as the military provider fulfilling civil aviation regulations.

Name of the ANSP: MoD- Air Force of the Slovak Republic (MoD- VzS OS SR)

Governance: State organisation Ownership: Slovak Republic


ATC en-route N

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS N At Sliač Airport provided by LPS (based on the contract arrangements)

CNS Y

MET N At Sliač Airport provided by SHMÚ

ATCO training Y Only unit training, other types of training are provided by LPS (based on the contract arrangements)

Others N/A


Annual Report published: N

ATC systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance2 N

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales Air Systems

Upgrade3 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2018 - 2019

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? -

ATC Unit Bratislava ACC, Štefánik APP/TWR

2Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 3 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: EUROCONTROL

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2018

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? -

ATC Unit Bratislava ACC, Štefánik APP/TWR

ATC Units

The ATC units in the Slovak Republic airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route TMA

Bratislava ACC 5 + 1** AT, CZ, PL, UA, HU

Štefánik APP/TWR 1 AT, HU + 1 TWR for Bratislava M. R. Štefánik Airport

Košice APP/TWR 1 HU + 1 TWR for Košice Airport

Tatry TWR 1 PL Incl. TWR for Poprad-Tatry Airport

Piešťany TWR 1 N/A Incl. TWR for Piešťany Airport

Žilina TWR 1 CZ Incl. TWR for Žilina Airport

Sliač APP/TWR 1 N/A + 1 TWR for Sliač Airport

1.2.3. Airports

General information

The main airports/aerodromes in the Slovak Republic are:

Letisko M. R. Štefánik - Bratislava Airport, Košice Airport, Piešťany Airport, Sliač Airport, Poprad-Tatry Airport and Žilina Airport. They all are international airports for public use.

All above-mentioned airports are joint stock companies. Ownership differs on individual airports and stakeholders are usually municipalities, regional governments, MoT SK and private companies.

Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the Annex E of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2016, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.

So the following airport is covered in this LSSIP: Bratislava Airport.

Note: Traffic density at Bratislava Airport does not require implementation of all Objectives as they are defined for the Airports listed in the ESSIP Plan. In such cases N/A is used. Nevertheless all above mentioned Objectives are carefully monitored and implemented as appropriate.


1.2.4. Military Authorities

The Military Stakeholders involved in ATM in the Slovak Republic are composed of:

Military Aviation Authority of MoD (MAA);

Air Force of the Slovak Republic (VzS OS SR).

They report to the Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic.

Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.


Regulatory role

MAA is established by the Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic, which is responsible for safety oversight of military aviation and, participate on regulatory functions.

Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N

Level of such legal provision: State Law (Act 143/1998 as amended §46 and §48a)

Level of such legal provision: State Law and EU legislation.

Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, the Chairman of the Parliament and the President of the Slovak Republic

Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, the Chairman of the Parliament and the President of the Slovak Republic and EU structures.

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N

OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination N

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N

ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification N

ANSP Oversight Y ANSP Supervision N

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: N/A Additional Information: N/A

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP N/A

National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N/A

EUROCONTROL eAIP Y EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A

Other: None Other: None


Oversight

Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

Y If YES, since: June 2015 Duration of the Certificate:

2 years

Certificate issued by: TA If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

N/A

Additional Information: Certification of providing of ANS for GAT on the Sliač Airport was completed.

User role

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: MAA SK National Supervisory Authority (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: TA

Additional information: N/A Additional information: N/A

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route Y OAT Unit ATC en-route N

Approach/TMA Y ATC Units /VzS OS SR ATC approach, LZSL Y

Airfield/TWR/GND Y ATC Units /VzS OS SR ATC aerodrome, LZSL Y

AIS N AIS N

MET Y MET N

SAR Y VzS OS SR SAR Y

TSA/TRA monitoring

Y AMC FIS Y

Other: None Other: None

Additional Information: Tactical co-ordination with Air Defence (AD) unit

Additional Information: Military launched the provision of ANS for GAT at the Sliač Airport as from June 2011.

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service


Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges N

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF Y

CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8,33 N Mode S Y ACAS Y

Others: Mode S except fighter aircraft

Military in SK applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity

2.1. Evolution of traffic in the Slovak Republic

2016 Traffic in Slovakia increased by 6% during Summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2015.

2017 - 2021

The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 1.6% and 6.2%, with a baseline growth of 3.7% during the planning cycle.

0

100.000

200.000

300.000

400.000

500.000

600.000

700.000

800.000

2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F

IFR

flig

hts

Slovakia - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast

2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F

H 7.2% 9.2% 6.1% 5.0% 5.8% 5.2% 5.0%

B 4.4% 9.8% 7.2% 6.7% 6.5% 3.1% 2.9% 3.3% 2.9% 3.1%

L 6.2% 3.9% 0.6% 1.3% 1.3% 1.0% 1.2%

ECAC B -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.7% 1.4% 2.1% 2.1% 2.4% 1.9% 2.1%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2016)IFR flights yearly growth

Slovakia


2.2. BRATISLAVA ACC

2.2.1. Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2012 - 2021

2.2.2. Performance summer 2016

Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer

Capacity gap Ref value Actual

+6.4 % 133 (+2%) 0.15 0.05 No

The average en‐route delay per flight decreased from 0.12 to 0.05 minutes per flight in Summer 2016.

57% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 42% for weather.

Capacity Plan +5% Achieved Comments

Free Route DCTs within LZBB Yes

Implement Rolling ASM/ATFCM process No Full implementation expected in 1Q 2017

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes

Continuous improvements of the route network and sectorisation Yes

Enhanced sectorisation according to FABCE airspace plan Yes

Continuous recruitment to increase staff level Yes

Optimisation of sector opening times Yes

East/West sector configuration No Already limited manpower involved in other projects. Postponed until 2018.

Maximum configuration: 5 sectors Yes 5 sectors opened

Summer 2016 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 133, 2% higher than in 2015. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 123 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 111.

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Peak Day Traffic 1553 1563 1924 1832 2002

Summer Traffic 1217 1276 1419 1500 1596

Yearly Traffic 1004 1055 1161 1243 1375

Summer Traffic Forecast 1675 1733 1787 1845 1897

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 1723 1832 1926 2028 2147

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 1630 1638 1665 1701 1718

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.12 0.05

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.08 0.04

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inut

es

per

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)LZBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/2016


2.2.3. Planning Period 2017 - 2021

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

Capacity Plan

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Free Route Airspace Free Route Concept gradual implementation for FAB CE

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

Rolling ASM/ATFCM

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM

Airspace

Continuous improvements of the route network and sectorisation

Enhanced sectorisation according to FABCE airspace plan

East/West sector configuration

Procedures

Staffing Continuous recruitment to increase staff level

Technical HW/SW Upgrade

AGDL

Capacity Optimisation of sector opening times

Significant Events

Max sectors 5 6 6 6 6

Planned Annual Capacity increase. 2% 2% 0% 2% 0%

Reference Profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% 0% N/A N/A

Current Routes Profile % Increase 0% 2% 2% N/A N/A

Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile

2.3% 4.5% 4.5% N/A N/A

Difference Capacity Plan v. Current Routes Profile

2.3% 3.0% 0.7% N/A N/A

Annual Reference Value (min) 0.10 0.11 0.10 N/A N/A

Summer reference value (min) 0.15 0.16 0.15 N/A N/A

Additional information

An outline of available sector configuration for a typical weekday and a weekend day for summer 2017.


2017 ‐ 2021 Planning Period Outlook

No structural lack of capacity is foreseen for Bratislava ACC for the period 2017‐2021. Continual increase of capacity is covered mainly by improving of flow and capacity management techniques, optimizing sector configuration and sector opening times, increasing available sectors and introducing system changes that decrease workload of ATCOs. Continuous recruitment of additional controllers is in progress, in order to maintain sufficient level of operational staff.

0

1

2

3

4

5

600:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2017 ‐WD

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2017 ‐WE

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2017‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 133 133 133

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 133 133 133

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 133 135 138

Capacity Profile ‐ High 133 133 133

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 133 133 133

Capacity Baseline 130 133

2017 ‐ 2021 Plan 136 139 139 142 142

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

Cap

acity profile (movements per hour)

LZBBCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2015 applicable to the Slovak Republic all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Reference

number Recommendation 2015 Ownership

REC-2015/1

Operational stakeholders should ensure that the pace of implementation of pre-SESAR elements is increased, or at least kept at the same level to ensure timely delivery of SESAR baseline.

All operational stakeholders

Corrective actions taken: YES Description: LPS SR has started to use incentive mechanisms for SESAR deployment and has participated together with partners in some projects of implementation coordinated by SESAR Deployment Manager (e.g. FRA, SWIM Governance) and EUROCONTROL (SPICE).

REC-2015/2

Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOM19, FCM04, ATC07.1, ATC15, NAV10, ENV01, AOP04.1, ITY-ADQ, ITY-FMTP, INF07, COM10to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays, or at least ensure that these delays are not increased.

Local Stakeholders

Corrective actions taken: YES Description: FCM04, ATC07.1, ATC15, ENV01, AOP4.1 are not applicable to the Slovak Republic, ITY-FMTP, COM10 have been completed. INF07- National TOD policy is established in Annex 1 of national regulation L 15 (national implementation of ICAO Annex 15). Working group has been established to facilitate implementation of TOD/ADQ policy. The AREA 1 data is available for both terrain and obstacles. AREA 2 and AREA 4 terrain data is available. Verification of the regulatory compliance of TOD implementation is planned. NAV10 - Implementation of APV procedures at LZIB, LZKZ and LZPP has been completed. Implementation of APV procedures for other airports (LZZI, LZTT) are planned to be completed by the end of august 2017. AOM19- Initial steps have been implemented, next activities are in the pipeline. The objective is a part of a FAB CE coordinated project and its completion is foreseen before the end of 2018. ITY-ADQ - The ADQ working group is preparing the methodology guidance on meeting the requirements of the ADQ Regulation, which shall act as a national methodology applicable in the area of civil aviation of the Slovak Republic. The web based application AIS Web Portal is planned to be launched in Q3 2017.

REC-2015/7

ANSPs should use the momentum created by PCP funding opportunities to secure and achieve full interoperability in line with Master Plan Level 1 vision.

ANSPs benefiting from EU funding

Corrective actions taken: YES Description: LPS have received co-funding for 4 projects from CEF 2014 and 2015 calls, on which they participate in collaboration with other partners. They have applied for co-funding of 4 other projects from the latest CEF call 2016. The nature of the projects ranges from operational to infrastructure focused and all are contributing to PCP implementation.


Chapter 4 National Projects

The main projects currently ongoing in the Slovak Republic are depicted in the tables below:

Aeronautical Data Quality

Organisation(s): Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development (SK)

Type of project: National

Schedule: From: 2010 To: 2018

Status: In progress.

Description: Implementation of the quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information for the single European Sky according to Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010.

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: INF07, ITY-ADQ

Other links: -

Project included in RP2 Performance Plan:

- Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan:

-

Project included in DP2016:

- Name/Code in DP2016: -

Performance contribution

Safety: See "Capacity".

Environment: See "Capacity".

Capacity: By implementing of the Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 it is expected that the quality of all aeronautical data will be improved with positive contribution to all KPAs - capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment.

Cost-efficiency: See "Capacity".

Operational efficiency: -

Air-ground radiocommunication system

Organisation(s): Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)



Status: In progress

Description: Implementation of requirements laid down in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012. Upgraded radio stations will also be capable VoIP interfaces

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: ITY-AGVCS2

Other links: -



-






Environment: -

Capacity: Safety and capacity enhancement

Cost-efficiency: -


Radar Sliač

Organisation(s): Ministry of Defence (SK) Type of project: National


Status: Planned

Description: Replacing of existing obsolete terminal radar by the new one to enhance safety, in addition, to be Mode S capable.

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: ITY-SPI

Other links: -



-





Environment: -

Capacity: The new SRE with extended SSR Mode S functionality is capable to increase safety and capacity.

Cost-efficiency: Replacement of the ATM system reaching the end of its operational life and to align the systems performance with implementation of the SESAR in order to effectively improve quality of the services.



Upgrade of the E2000 system




Status: In progress

Description: Upgrade of E2000 system to enable to comply with the SES operational requirements in the region as part of FAB establishment.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: ESSIP Objectives



-




Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: Replacement of the ATM system reaching the end of its operational life and to align the systems performance with implementation of the SESAR in order to effectively improve quality of the services.


eTOD

Organisation(s): Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development (SK)



Status: Partially completed: Area 1 and 4 data is available; Area 2 terrain available; Area 2 obstacles in progress. Area 3 not planned.

Description: Partially completed: Area 1 and 4 data is available; Area 2 terrain available; Area 2 obstacles in progress. Area 3 not planned.

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: INF07, ITY-ADQ

Other links: -



-





Environment: See "Capacity".

Capacity: It is expected that implementation of electronic terrain and obstacle data will have the positive impact to all KPAs - capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment.

Cost-efficiency: See "Capacity".



Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination

5.1. FAB Co-ordination


Advanced Air Traffic Services

AOM19.1 - For the time being, only Hungary has a specific ASM support tool (LARA) in operation, Croatia to follow early 2017. All other FABCE ANSPs plan to deploy LARA or an equivalent system by the end of 2018. The real-time management of ASM information (AOM19.2 and AOM19.3) currently sees a variety of intentions, ranging from ‘no plan’ to ‘ongoing’.

FCM03 - The implementation of collaborative flight planning messages (APL, ACH, AFP) shows a heterogeneous status, whereas the weakest point turns out to be the full AFP implementation (‘no plan’ to ‘late’).

FCM04.1 - STAM Phase 1 is planned to go into operation at FABCE level on 27th of April 2017 (except SK, BiH). STAM Phase 2 (FCM04.2) is still under discussion.

FCM05 (interactive rolling NOP) - Implementation of interactive rolling NOP is planned through upgrades of the automated ASM support systems with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM. The objective is considered to become part of a FABCE project.

FCM06 (TFC complexity assessment) - is tackled at FABCE level within the DAM/STAM study.

AOM 21.1/2 (DCT, Free Route Airspace) - forming part of a main FABCE project, Free Route Airspace is going to be deployed stepwise within and across FABCE borders. Two main cross-border initiatives have been implemented in 2016, respectively early 2017 at H24 basis: SAXFRA- SLO/AUT and SEENFRA - HUN/ROM/BUL. Besides that, national DCT implementations are already in force and are planned to be extended. Likewise, further cross-border FRA applications beyond FABCE are planned for implementation in 2018 (e.g. SECSI FRA, merging SAXFRA and Croatian+Serbian/Montenegrin Airspace.

Moreover, a Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study (GO FRA OF Study) has been identified to start off in 2017, including Baltic FAB, Danube FAB, FAB CE, SMATSA and M-NAV.

ATC07.1 (ATC15.1, ATC 15.2) - AMAN Vienna is considered as a regional project, but nevertheless, will include and affect the majority of the FABCE states. Planned for implementation by end 2018. Extended AMAN for Vienna is currently scheduled until 2023 at the latest.

ATC12.1 - Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring: dependent on the national ATM system development, the MTCD function is considered a prerequisite for Free Route Airspace application. MTCD is already widely implemented; TCT is left to the ANSPs depending on local conditions.

ATC17 - Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer: Having identified this objective as extremely beneficial for FRA application, the operational deployment is foreseen at those Units, which are capable do so and where relevant, by end 2018.


High Performing Airport Operations

Enabling Aviation Infrastructure

AOP04.2 - ASMGCS Level 2 is implemented in Praha and Vienna. Budapest has implemented Level 1, and Level 2 planned by end 2017. Although not part of the applicability area, Zagreb plans Level 2 before end 2018.

AOP05 - A-CDM: implemented in Praha, planned in Budapest by end 2017 and Zagreb (2017/18). Vienna status is locally fully implemented, missing only DPI message transmission, planned for mid 2018.

AOP10 - Time Based Separation: Applicable for Vienna; project has started, and in conjunction and based on AMAN implementation, it will be operational by end of 2021.

AOP 12/13 - Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring: planned for Praha and Vienna in time.

COM10 - Migration to AMHS: completed in AUT, SLO and SK. Ongoing in HUN, CRO and BiH; late in CZR (2018).

COM11 – Voice over IP: all FABCE states are ongoing and plan this objective in time by 2020. FCM08 – Extended Flight Plan: Specifications and requirements for the EFPL / ICAO FF-ICE are

locally under discussion. Roadmaps for TOPSKY will foresee a later implementation, e.g. 2024.

ITY-AGDL: completed in AUT, CZR and HU. Ongoing CRO and SLO, planned for BiH and late for SK (2019).

ITY-ACID - Aircraft ID: Mode S, and partly additionally A-WAM technologies, are applied in all FABCE states. Remaining actions to reach 100% of coverage are conceived until 2019, for BiH in 2020.

ITY-AGVCS2 – 8,33 kHz below FL 195: All FABCE states do plan the FRQ conversions in time until end of 2018.


A safety approach to the Network operations is ensured through the FAB CE Safety Sub-committee and its cross domain Safety activities. The FAB CE Safety Management Roadmap specifies that the FAB CE ANSPs share inter alia experience regarding Just Culture. Just Culture implemented locally, taking into account the national legislation.

In close cooperation with NM, capacity enhancements are permanently identified and implemented. FABCE is going to reach the RP2 targets for ATFM Delays throughout the whole period.

Shared technical platforms, common use of Networks and maintenance, reduced NAV equipment, and others.

X-Bone, common HW Procurement (FAB CE Project 17) The goal is to upgrade the X-bone routers in accordance with X-bone Annual General Meeting decision GM4-D11, and to accomplish the first FAB CE common procurement and lay down procedural foundations for the further common procurement activities.

Integration of Security Event Management and Security Information Management into one service providing better quality and security of communication systems and higher resistance against potential threats.

Two main projects of the FABCE Program Management deal actively with operational efficiency:

Airspace Planning and Design (FRA) including aligned operational procedures, and Flexible Use of Airspace (ASM / STAM).

Flight efficiency through Free Route applications improves steadily, based on the above mentioned ops efficiency projects.


5.2. FAB Projects

FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning Project (incl. FAB CE X-Border Free Route Airspace Study) (FAB CE Project 1)

Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI)

Type of project: FAB

Schedule: Project 1: Start 3.1.2011, End: Continuous Project 1 FAB CE FRA Study: Start: 1.9.2015, End: 21.4.2017

Status: Ongoing activity Project is on track: - CEF FRA Study RTS CONOPS is delivered - FRA CONOPS available and the review and update will commence in 01/2017 once RTS report is available - ATM System Requirements report is available - Other activities in progress, will be delivered on schedule - FAB CE Airspace Plan 2016 delivered - FAB CE Network Operations Plan delivered

Description: The objective of Project 1 is the optimal use of the airspace within FAB CE, taking into account air traffic flows while ensuring consistency with the wider European network together with the assessment and implementation of the Free Route Airspace concept. The project will implement the FAB CE X-Border FRA study („Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea” project). The key benefit expected from the project is to create a clear definition of the operational end technical pre-conditions for a conceived FAB CE X-Border Free Route Airspace, by creating a study. The study aims at defining the operational end technical pre-conditions to implement the FAB CE Free Route Airspace, including Concept of Operations, the necessary validation exercises thereof and the required development and upgrade requirements of ATM systems of the FAB CE members. Project 1 also includes annual updates of FAB CE Network Operations Plan (FNOP) and FAB CE Airspace Plan.

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2

Other links: SESAR Key Feature: Advanced air traffic services DP2016 Families: AF 3.2.1 AF 3.2.3 AF 3.2.4 FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO5, target 5.1: Implement Free Route Airspace “Baseline scenario” FSO10, target 10.3: Incorporate actions supporting the SESAR deployment (Deployment Plan / Programme 2015) in the joint FAB CE planning process and planning documentation


Y Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan:

FAB CE FRA Project (described under NSP actions 'FAB CE Airspace and route structure planning' and 'Free Route Airspace')


Y Name/Code in DP2016: 102AF3 – Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea



Safety: ++ The baseline assumption is that the potential implementation of GO FRA would be safety neutral or positive, i.e. the level of safety would not degrade due to the introduction of a FAB CE FRA OPS.

Environment: +++ 11% saving in horizontal flight efficiency by saving 2.1 km deviations (millions) from GCD and saving 23,000 tonnes of Annual CO2 in 2017.

Capacity: ++ To increase capacity to cope with the increase of around 60% in traffic in 2017 with a maximum delay of 0.28 minutes.

Cost-efficiency: +++ Improvement over 2006 in ATM/CNS costs per flight hour and achieve 469 of economic costs per flight hour in 2017.

Operational efficiency: ++ Advanced ATS required for FRA implementation have a positive impact on all aspects of operational efficiency.

Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes / FAB CE-wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM (FAB CE Project 3 / DAM/STAM Study)



Schedule: Project 3: Start: 29.10.2010, End: 2016

DAM/STAM Study: Start: 7.2.2017, End: 31.12.2018

Status: Project 3 closed in 2016 Follow-on project 'DAM/STAM Study': Planned Currently under development, the CEF application is being finalised

Description: The objective of Project 3 was to optimise the flow of air traffic and the management of airspace within FAB CE, taking into account the FAB CE airspace plan and ensuring consistency with the wider European network operations together with the assessment and implementation of the Rolling ASM/ATFCM Processes and STAM IDP/DM Activity Areas. The project achieved most of its original objectives and was closed in 2016. Project 3 is being followed-up with the new 'FAB CE-wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM' Study Project. The main objective of the DAM/STAM study project is to obtain a key FAB CE high-level document that contains all relevant elements required for a consequent FAB CE wide implementation of DAM and STAM processes. As such the DAM /STAM final report can be seen as an implementation roadmap for all involved FAB CE ANSPs, a FAB CE ASM document that defines the high level operational concept for FAB CE DAM/STAM by describing the collaboration, processes, procedures and tools needed for later implementation. The second main objective of the DAM/STAM study is to provide the involved ANSP with all required information necessary to plan for closing existing gaps to PCP /Deployment Plan on a local level. As a FAB CE wide assessment revealed gaps to the DP 2016 among the ANSP in all the related AF families, the DAM /STAM study is the FAB CE led activity to coordinate the closure of these remaining gaps. Furthermore, it is a stated goal of the DAM/STAM study to describe and prepare the conditions required to allow for a FAB CE wide harmonization of ASM, FUA, DAM and STAM processes. The effect of this is seen to be FAB CE wide ASM that will allow to unlock the full operational benefits associated to FAB CE FRA implementation.


Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: AOM19.1, AOM19.2, AOM19.3, FCM04.1, FCM04.2, FCM06

Other links: Optimised ATM network services DP2016 Families: AF 3.1.1 AF 3.1.2 AF 3.1.3 AF 3.1.4 AF 4.1.1 AF 4.1.2 AF 4.4.2 FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO10, target 10.3: Incorporate actions supporting the SESAR deployment (Deployment Plan / Programme 2015) in the joint FAB CE planning process and planning documentation.



Advanced Airspace Management (described under NSP actions)


N Name/Code in DP2016: CEF Application will be submitted as a part of PCP under CEF2016 Call


Safety: + -Increased situational awareness of FMPs, supervisors and ATCOs. STAM will give more options to avoid overloads. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain.

Environment: ++ Trajectories are expected to be more efficient due to procedures and processes accommodating short-term changes. Larger selection of airspace configurations/scenarios available to allow for more robust planning. Direct positive impact thanks to shorter and more direct routes whenever possible, which will lead to an optimized fuel usage of the AU. In addition, increased robustness on the overall allocation of airspace will lead to a more appropriate fuel loading of airspace users. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain.

Capacity: ++ Better usage of available airspace volumes with reduced complexity will lead to higher capacity. Short-term opportunities are effectively and efficiently managed. Overall increase of airspace capacity through optimised utilisation of airspace configurations and scenarios. STAM will give more opportunities to balance traffic demand and available capacity. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain.

Cost-efficiency: + A capacity increase combined with increased situational awareness of the ATCO is enhanced through the introduction of complexity assessments for expected scenarios. Combined this will lead to adjustments of sector monitoring values and ATCO productivity. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain.

Operational efficiency: ++ The application of the data / information sharing concept among all involved stakeholders will lead to an increased robustness and predictability of the FAB CE managed airspace. Following FAB CE FRA simulations and GO FRA FTS, the DAM STAM study assess the results in order to quantify the impact on this domain.


Deployment of FAB CE Competence Scheme (FAB CE Project 13)



Schedule: Start: 1.12.2010

Status: Frozen in 2015

Description: The objective of the project is to implement the agreed measures described in the FAB CE Competence/Transition Plan to fill in the remaining detected gaps towards full harmonisation of ATCOs competence. It will progressively extend to AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP, where the level of harmonisation is currently lower. The coordination with NSAs will be the essential part of the project activities. The project was frozen in 2015.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO15, target 15.1: Implementation and monitoring of the commonly approved Common Competence Schemes


N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan:

-


N Name/Code in DP2016: -


Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: + Cost-efficiency of training



Training Facilities (FAB CE Project 14)





Description: The objective of the project is to define and fully harmonise the training of ATCOs, AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP based on the Common Competence Schemes defined by FAB CE P13, focus on achieving an optimal use of ATM staff and higher cost efficiency in training. All above in order to facilitate the development of the same performance standards, interoperability, common licensing and increase in performance and quality by applying best practices and exchanging resources. The project has been frozen in 2015.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO15, target 15.2: Common training of ATCO of two or more ANSPs conducted FSO15, target 15.3: Common training of ATSEP of two or more ANSPs conducted FSO15, target 15.4: Common use of training facilities of two or more ANSPs conducted



-




Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: + Contributes to develop the network human capital and improve its flexibility.



ANSP Charging (FAB CE P15)





Description: The objective of the project is to identify how the Single Unit Rate or other modification to the charging mechanism can support Free Route Airspace implementation from the point of view of the revenue distribution and capacity utilization of FABCE ANSPs. The project was frozen in 2015.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: -



-




Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: + Improve cost-efficiency, mitigation of financial risks



X-Bone HW Procurement (FAB CE Project 17)



Schedule: Start: 19.2.2016, End: 28.6.2017

Status: Ongoing Tender documentation finalised, common procurement expected early 2017

Description: The primary goal of this project is to upgrade the X-bone routers in accordance with X-bone Annual General Meeting decision GM4-D11. The secondary goal of this project is to accomplish the first FAB CE common procurement and lay down procedural foundations for the further common procurement activities, if feasible.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: CNS Rationalisation Enabling aviation infrastructure FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO6, target 6.5: Realise common (smart) procurement of relevant CNS infrastructure and ATM processing systems in FAB CE



Optimisation of CNS resources




Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: + Savings in procurement of CNS infrastructure



Surveillance Infrastructure Optimisation (FAB CE Project 18)




Status: Ongoing Some processes finalised, others being developed

Description: Project 18 within the FAB CE is expected to: - Develop processes for coordinated infrastructure planning and maintenance thus leading

to a proactive consultation process and a FAB CE-wide information exchange regarding SUR systems for increased cost-effectiveness;

- Propose improvements in SUR coverage quality by coverage optimisation; - Conduct a feasibility study including a Cost Benefit Analysis of implementing a regional

tracker for different scenarios vis-a-vis EUROCONTROL CS3 Study [R7], bringing facts and figures for making a "make or buy" decision.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: CNS Rationalisation Enabling aviation infrastructure FAB CE Strategic Objectives: - FSO6, target 6.3: Incorporate planning of the CNS infrastructure and ATM

processing systems aligned with RP planning, to achieve its harmonisation and optimisation in the FAB CE Implementation Plan;

- FSO6, target 6.4: Establish common operation of CNS infrastructure and ATM processing services as defined by the FAB CE Architecture including shared data processing functions, shared information pool and sharing of human resources where applicable and proven to be beneficial;

- FSO7, target 7.1: Establish FAB CE common approach to technical operation and corrective / preventive maintenance of systems, including sharing of spare parts.



Optimisation of CNS resources




Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: + Efficiency of the processes; Informed decision about future solution for the regional tracker.


Cooperation Activities: -


5.3. Regional cooperation

5.3.1. Regional Projects

ACCelerating EGNOS adoPTion in Aviation (ACCEPTA)


Type of project: Regional

Schedule: 2012 - 2014

Status: Completed

Description: 27 participants, including ANSPs, airlines and manufacturers have taken part in the project. The project involved implementation of RNP approaches at airport Bratislava and Košice.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: -



-




Safety: +++ .

Environment: +++ .

Capacity: + .

Cost-efficiency: + Reduced fuel consumption and CO2 emissions by aircraft.

Operational efficiency: ++ .



ANSPs cross-border network (-)

Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)


Schedule: -

Status: -

Description: The CEOs of all 7 FAB CE air navigation service providers signed the Interconnection Framework Agreement on a regional network for the transmission of information. This agreement crowns several years of active cooperation among network professionals on the development of their ANSPs cross-border network, in short X-bone. It is a fully redundant IPv6 backbone, interconnecting individual networks of national ANSPs. It serves for operational as well as for test and development purposes between the ANSPs in Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia. Extension to FAB CE as well as other countries is foreseen in the near future.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: -



-




Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: -




Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study (GO FRA OF Study)

Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), BULATSA (BG), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL), ROMATSA (RO), SMATSA (BA), Slovenia Control (SI)



Status: Planned CEF Application is being finalised under CEF Call 2016

Description: GO FRA Study within the Gate One region is expected to: - Evaluate the feasibility of connecting FAB and national level FRA initiatives to a larger common FRA area as a step towards Pan-European FRA deployment; - Expand the application of FRA and cover geographical gaps in FAB-level FRA implementation by the inclusion of non-FAB states to the GO FRA scope; - Facilitate the deployment of FRA in a large multi-FAB/state area by utilising the existing FRA initiatives, lessons learned and individual studies performed by the participating ANSPs in defining the framework for a common GO FRA application within a defined airspace, fully integrated with the FAB/state level FRA initiatives; - Reduce fragmentation and remove overlaps between the currently on-going different national/bi-lateral/FAB-level FRA initiatives; - Enable airspace user benefit realisation with regard to FRA operations in a larger area resulting in improved flight efficiency and reduced environmental impact.

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2

Other links: Advanced air traffic services DP2016 Families: AF 3.2.1 AF 3.2.3 AF 3.2.4 FAB CE Strategic Objectives: FSO5, target 5.1: Implement Free Route Airspace “Baseline scenario” FSO10, target 10.3: Incorporate actions supporting the SESAR deployment (Deployment Plan / Programme 2015) in the joint FAB CE planning process and planning documentation.



-


N Name/Code in DP2016: CEF Application will be submitted as a part of PCP under CEF2016 Call


Safety: + The baseline assumption is that the potential implementation of GO FRA would be safety neutral or positive, i.e. the level of safety would not degrade due to the introduction of a large scale FRA OPS. Occurrences of SAF2, SAF3 and SAF4 KPI’s should not increase as a result of the Gate One – wide FRA application. The introduction of multi-FAB/state FRA is expected to introduce improvements in system interoperability, procedures and potentially the use of ground based safety nets and monitoring aids expected to result in improvements to the overall safety in the impacted area.

Environment: + The introduction of multi-FAB/state FRA is expected to improve flight efficiency through the availability of user preferred routing and improved network connectivity between the participating FABs/states. Indicative flight efficiency (in time) assessments will be made through macro-level modelling and FTS exercises during Activities 3 and 4.


Capacity: + The baseline assumption is that the potential implementation of GO FRA would be capacity neutral or positive, i.e. the participating ANSPs capacities would not degrade (KPI CAP5) due to the introduction of a large scale FRA OPS. The introduction of multi-FAB/state FRA may increase the airspace capacity with the appropriate system support and sector configuration and capacity management procedures. However, this would need to be verified through local/FAB-level RTS simulations and/or live-trials during the potential implementation phase.

Cost-efficiency: + Introduction of Gate One FRA is not expected to impact ANS Cost Efficiency KPI COS1. Impact on COS3 is expected to be negligible as ASNPs will be required to implement changes to their ATM systems for FRA compatibility regardless of GO FRA.

Operational efficiency: + It is expected that the ATM functionalities required to support flight data sharing in a large-scale FRA environment will improve predictability but this will require validation on local/FAB-level.


HETA Harmonisation

Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)


Schedule: Completed by March 31, 2016

Status: Implemented for LPS

Description: A common working group of experts from LPS, Austrocontrol and Hungarocontrol has been established to harmonize transition altitude at 10 000 ft (TA10K project) within BRATISLAVA FIR, Wien and Budapest.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: -



-




Safety: ++ .

Environment: -

Capacity: + .

Cost-efficiency: -

Operational efficiency: +++ .



Implementing RNP APCH Operations With EGNOS (IMPROWE)

Organisation(s): Austrocontrol (AT), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)


Schedule: 2015 - 2017

Status: Ongoing

Description: The project involves implementation of RNP approaches at airports Piešťany, Žilina and Poprad.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: -



-




Safety: +++ .

Environment: +++ .

Capacity: ++ .

Cost-efficiency: ++ Reduced fuel consumption and CO2 emissions by aircraft.



Synchronised PBN Implementation Cohesion Europe (SPICE)



Schedule: 2016 - 2020

Status: Ongoing

Description: Implementation of RNAV SIDs and STARs within TMAs of airports where LPS provide ANS. Upgrade of RNP approaches in Bratislava and Košice. DME deployment to improve DME - DME coverage within BRATISLAVA FIR.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: -



-




Safety: +++ .

Environment: +++ .

Capacity: +++ .

Cost-efficiency: +++ Reduced fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, level of noise in urban areas.




AMAN LOWW initial (2015_234_AF1_A, 2015_234_AF1_B)

Organisation(s): ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)


Schedule: 01.03.2016 – 31.12.2018

Status: Tuning Phase has started in 2016, refined implementation steps identified till end 2018.

Description: Deploying Basic Arrival Manager (AMAN) function (allowing evolution to extended AMAN) for Terminal Area Vienna Attaching ACC Vienna to the Vienna AMAN Integrating AMAN functionality with the training and simulation environment ("BEST") Ensuring Interaction with adjacent units

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: -



-


Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_234_AF1_A, 2015_234_AF1_B


Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: -


Cooperation Activities: The project implementation scope depends on the coordinated work of all 4 partners (Austro Control GmbH, Hungarocontrol, LPS, ANS/CR) and is split into a cohesion and non-cohesion part.


10; 34%

10; 33%

4; 13%

3; 10%

2; 7% 1; 3% Completed

Ongoing

Planned

Late

No Plan

Not Applicable

Missing Data

Undefined

Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress

6.1. State View

6.1.1. Overall Objective Implementation

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

The level of ESSIP Objective implementation is adequate, many Objectives have been implemented in accordance to the ESSIP Plan, the others are planned to be implemented in time. There are some minor Objectives, which are either considered as not applicable or applicable with short delay. The main reason for Not applicable Objectives is low traffic density, which does not justify an automation.

The justification for delay of three Objectives is below:

Implementation of the Objectives ITY-ADQ is late due to complexity of the Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010. The working group was established, which is preparing the methodology guidance on meeting the requirements of the ADQ Regulation, which shall act as a national methodology applicable in the area of civil aviation of the Slovak Republic. The web based application AIM Web Portal is planned to be launched in Q3 2017.

With regard to objectives ITY-AGVCS2 activities related to extension of 8,33 channel spacing below F 195 are in progress. Working group for safety case study has been established and is envisaged to be completed by 2016. Stakeholders will be kept informed.

Fulfilment of ITY-AGDL and ITY-COTR objectives has been incorporated into the specification of requirements on the E2000 system upgrade. The project for E2000 system upgrade has been postponed due to procurement issues.


6.1.2. Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature

Legend:

## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF)

100% = Objective completed = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline


Average implementation progress: 19%

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

0%

‐

AOM19.1 ASM support tools to support A‐FUA 36%

AOM19.2 ASM Management of real‐time airspace data 0%

AOM19.3 ASM Management of real‐time airspace data 0%

FCM01 Enhanced tactical flow management services 100%

FCM03 Collaborative flight planning 32%

FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1

n/a

FCM04.2 STAM Phase 2 5%

FCM05 Interactive rolling NOP 0%

FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment 0%


Advanced Air Traffic Services


<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM21.1 Direct Routing 100%

AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace 3%

ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 100%

ATC02.8 Ground‐based Safety Nets 100%

ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures

LZIB ‐ Bratislava Airport (Outside Applicability Area)

n/a

ATC12.1

Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring

48%

ATC15.1

Implement, in en‐route operations, information exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN

n/a

ATC15.2 Arrival Management extended to en‐route airspace

n/a

ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1

100%

ATC17

Electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer

n/a

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations


n/a

ITY‐COTR Ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes

100%

NAV03 RNAV 1 44%

NAV10 APV procedures 90%


High Performing Airport Operations


<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1


n/a

AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2


n/a

AOP05 Airport CDM


n/a

AOP10 Time‐Based Separation


n/a

AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan


‐ 0%

AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring


n/a

AOP13 Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing


n/a

ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management


n/a

SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions

100%


Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 57%

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 100%

COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 8%

FCM08 Extended Flight Plan 0%

‐

INF04 Integrated briefing 100%

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 65%

ITY‐ACID Aircraft identification 96%

ITY‐ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

61%

ITY‐AGDL Initial ATC air‐ground data link services 14%

ITY‐AGVCS2 8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL195

14%

ITY‐FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100%

ITY‐SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability 69%


6.1.3. ICAO ASBU Implementation

The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.

These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).

Legend:

= Completed (during 2016 or before)

= Missing planning date

= Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance

100%

90%

B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2)

B0‐FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground‐Ground Integration

100%

B0‐DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management

100%

80%

B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%

B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets

100%

B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through

B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)

B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories

100%

60%

B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network‐Wide view

100%

66%

B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%

69%

B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)

100%

44%

B0‐TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En‐Route

100%

14%


6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress

Two colour codes are used for each Implementation Objective ‘box’:

o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and

o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

ECAC Completed No Plan

EU+ Ongoing Not Applicable

Multi-N Planned Missing Data

APT Late

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

0% No Plan

‐

Conclusion (on state level) about implementation of EUROAT has not been adopted. If any progress is achieved in 2017, the objective shall be updated in the next year edition of LSSIP. GAT/OAT procedures applied under ICAO rules, implemented in the LoAs for civil/military coordination.

‐

REG (By:12/2018)

Transport Authority

Conclusion (on state level) about implementation of EUROAT has not been adopted.

‐ 0% No Plan

‐

Military Aviation Authority

National legislation was not revised. The military rules for harmonisation of GAT and OAT was done in December 2011. Conclusion (on state level) about implementation of EUROAT has not been adopted. Military Aviation Authority is ready to participate on the project ‐ drafting Procedures for OAT/GAT.

‐ 0%

No Plan

‐

Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development


‐ 0%

No Plan

‐

ASP (By:12/2018)

Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik


‐ 0%

No Plan

‐


‐ ‐ 0% No Plan

‐

MIL (By:12/2018)


National legislation was not revised. The military rules for harmonisation of GAT and OAT was done in December 2011. Conclusion (on state level) about implementation of EUROAT has not been adopted.

‐ 0%

No Plan

‐


AOM19.1

ASM support tools to support A‐FUA Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

36% Ongoing

‐

Initial basic steps implemented; next activities will be finished by the end of 2016. Waiting for NMF and implementation of FAB CE. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)


Initial basic steps implemented; next activities will be finished by June 2017.

‐ 62%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

Slovak Air Force

‐ ‐ 10% Ongoing

31/12/2018

AOM19.2

ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Activities will start after full LARA implementation. ‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2021

AOM19.3

Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Activities will start after full LARA implementation. ‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2021

AOM21.1

Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed

‐

Implementation of Direct Routing procedures/processes including the ANSP system upgrade and implementation of the transversal activities were implemented in compliance with the schedule. Objective was implemented in the context of FAB CE projects – see details in Chapter 5.

28/04/2016

ASP (By:12/2017)


Implementation of Direct Routing procedures/processes completed in compliance with the schedule.

Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework

Study

100%

Completed

28/04/2016


AOM21.2

Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

3% Ongoing

‐

Free Route Airspace implementation strategy is planned for the purpose of better airspace utilisation and enhance productivity and reduce controller workload. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects – see details in Chapter 5.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Free Route Airspace implementation will follow successful introduction of Direct Routing.

FAB CE Strategic

Operational Planning

Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free

Route Airspace Study) / Gate One Free Route

Airspace Operational Framework

Study

3%

Ongoing

31/12/2021

AOP04.1

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1 Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective. ‐

REG (By:12/2010)

ASP (By:12/2011)


Not Applicable. Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2010)

Letisko M. R. Štefánika ‐ Airport Bratislava, a. s. (BTS)


‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


AOP04.2

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2 Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable



ASP (By:12/2017)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2017)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable



ASP (By:12/2016)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

AOP10 Time Based Separation Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable



REG (By:12/2023)

Transport Authority

‐ ‐ % Not Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

0% No Plan


Just at the beginning of the objective. Familiarization and initial cooperation between stakeholders has been started aimed to plan and fulfill respective lines of action.

‐

ASP (By:12/2021)


Just at the beginning of the objective. Familiarization process has been started aimed to identify required information and set up a process ensuring finalisation criteria AOP11‐ASP01 1).

‐ 0%

No Plan

‐

APO (By:12/2021)


Just at the beginning of the objective. Scoping and familiarization process has been started aiming to identify the necessary information to set up a process of evaluation.

‐ 0%

No Plan

‐

AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable



ASP (By:12/2020)


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective. ‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2020)


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective. APO is not a PCP Airport.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

AOP13

Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable


out of applicability area ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

Transport Authority

out of applicability area ‐ % Not Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)


out of applicability area ‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


ATC02.8

Ground‐based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed

‐

APW and MSAW Level 2 have been implemented in the ATM system. APM Level 1 is not implemented.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

Slovak Air Force

Only for Sliač Airport is implemented. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2016


APW and MSAW Level 2 have been implemented in the ATM system. APM Level 1 is not implemented.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2016

ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable


Traffic does not justify automation. ‐

ASP (By:12/2019)


Traffic does not justify automation. ‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

ATC12.1

Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

48% Ongoing

‐

Pre‐caution tool (Extended STCA) and Separation tool as TCT functions have been implemented and others will be implemented as part of upgrade of the ATM system.

05/02/2019

ASP (By:12/2021)


Pre‐caution tool (Extended STCA) and Separation tool as TCT functions have been implemented and others will be as part of upgrade of the ATM system.

‐ 48%

Ongoing

05/02/2019

ATC15.1

Implement, in en‐route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable

‐

The ATM system supports the information exchange for this objective, however due to the level of traffic no AMAN is implemented in Slovak TMAs and therefore the objective is considered Not applicable. Awaiting coordination with neighbours for possible future implementation.

‐

ASP (By:12/2017)


The ATM system supports the information exchange for this objective, however due to the level of traffic no AMAN is implemented in Slovak TMAs and therefore the objective is considered Not applicable. Awaiting coordination with neighbours for possible future implementation of E‐AMAN in line with PCP.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


ATC15.2

Arrival Management extended to en‐route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

% Not Applicable

‐

National ASP is ready to participate, for the time being there is no request from neighbouring units to apply AMAN within en route sectors.

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)


LPS is ready to participate, for the time being there is no request from neighbouring units to apply AMAN within en‐ route sectors.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable

‐

Slovakia is out of applicability area. The use of this objective is being discussed at FAB CE level. Currently only preliminary plans exist.

‐

ASP (By:12/2018)

Slovak Air Force

Slovakia is out of applicability area. Moreover, MIL is considered as low level stakeholder.

‐ % Not Applicable

‐


The use of this objective is being discussed at FAB CE level. Currently only preliminary plans exist.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

100% Completed

‐

LPS had implemented Basic ATSMHS capability and gateway facilities to AFTN in 2008. Migration of the international CIDIN circuits to AMHS started with COM centres in Vienna and Budapest. AMHS connections to other centres like Madrid, Warsaw, Zagreb have been implemented and other will follow.

31/12/2014

ASP (By:12/2018)

Slovak Air Force

MIL is in position of AFTN client from LPS. Development of own ATS Messaging Management will include support of AMHS capability.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2008


LPS had implemented required infrastructure in 2008 already and is prepared for AMHS transfer. Tests with COM centres in Vienna, Budapest and Prague have been performed. Military will be connected to the AFTN/AMHS through the ASP.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014


COM11

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

8% Ongoing

‐

The future change is under evaluation and preparation. 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

Slovak Air Force

MIL Voice Communication Systems to support VoIP and Provider of military communication network are not ED137 compatible. Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in MIL ATM is under review.

‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2020


VoIP pilot project is under progress to be concluded in 2016/2017.

‐ 10%

Ongoing

31/12/2020

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable


Density of traffic allows to apply CDO techniques most of the time (no restrictions by ATC). General information regarding the application of CDO has been published in national AIP (LZIB AD 2.21.3.3). ATCOs have been trained accordingly (phraseology, provide distance‐to‐go information).

‐

ASP (By:12/2013)


Density of traffic allows to apply CDO techniques most of the time (no restrictions by ATC). General information regarding the application of CDO has been published in national AIP (LZIB AD 2.21.3.3). ATCOs have been trained accordingly (phraseology, provide distance‐to‐go information).

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2013)


See ASP comment. ‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable



ASP (By:12/2016)


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective. ‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016)


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective. The objective will be further monitored and implemented when reasonable.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


FCM03

Collaborative flight planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

32% Ongoing

‐

Update of local ATM system has been initiated. Planned to be done on time. 31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2017)


Update of local ATM system has been initiated. ‐ 32%

Ongoing

31/12/2017

FCM04.1

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable

‐

Although FAB CE States are not in the initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed as part of FAB CE P3 and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September 2015. Live Trial was used to explore and verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. After assessing the results and recommendations coming from the FAB CE STAM LT, FAB CE OPS SC has decided to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE. Implementation is planned for 27. April 2017. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

‐

ASP (By:10/2017)


The initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September 2015. Live Trial was used to verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. After assessing the results and recommendations coming from the FAB CE STAM LT, FAB CE OPS SC has decided to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

FCM04.2

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

5% Ongoing

‐

Initial actions have started as part of FAB CE DAM/STAM Project (ex. P3). STAM phase 2 will be implemented with the availability of this function in the N‐connect Tool, planned for implementation by the end of 2018. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Initial actions have started as part of FAB CE DAM/STAM Project (ex. P3). STAM phase 2 will be implemented with the availability of this function in the N‐connect Tool, planned for implementation by the end of 2018. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

‐ 5%

Ongoing

31/12/2021


FCM05

Interactive rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Implementation of interactive rolling NOP is planned through upgrade of the automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM and Perform an integration of the automated ASM support systems with the Network. All these projects will be fulfilled in accordance with the NM support, the guidance and the relevant provisions of the NM B2B Reference Manuals. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

30/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Planned in 2021 ‐ 0%

Planned

30/12/2021

APO (By:12/2021)


Bratislava Airport is not IATA Level 3 Slot Coordinated airport yet. With the change of the coordination level this SLoA will be revaluated.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

FCM06

Traffic complexity assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Implementation of Traffic Complexity Assessment tool is planned to be implemented in line with the ASP Capacity Plan. At FAB CE level several options are discussed on whether ANSP will procure a ready‐made Complexity Assessment Tool, or will commit to develop such a tool using own resources. One solution is being discussed on the possibility to have a common FAB CE Complexity Tool, more details will be available end 02/2017. Initial actions have been made, with advanced use of CHMI functions (Associated Flows etc). Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Traffic Complexity Assessment is foreseen as a tool for better utilization of traffic capacity of the Slovak airspace. Implementation of this tool is in line with the capacity plan of the LPS.

‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2021


FCM08

Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% No Plan

‐

Implementation is currently under study. ‐

ASP (By:12/2021)


‐ ‐ 0%

No Plan

‐

INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018

65% Ongoing

‐

National TOD policy is established in Annex 1 of national regulation L 15 (national implementation of ICAO Annex 15). Working group has been established to facilitate implementation of TOD/ADQ policy. The AREA 1 data is available for both terrain and obstacles. AREA 2 and AREA 4 terrain data is available. Verification of the regulatory compliance of TOD implementation is planned.

31/05/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

Transport Authority

Database of obstacles in AREA 1, AREA 2 is available and is continuously updated.

‐ 78% Ongoing

30/12/2017

ASP (By:05/2018)


The AREA 1 and AREA 2 terrain data is available. Information for stakeholders how to access data is published in AIP.

‐ 100%

Completed

12/11/2015

APO (By:05/2018)


APO is part of the established Working group, which aims to facilitate implementation of TOD/ADQ. Based on the outcomes of the group a roadmap will be developed in conformity with the National TOD implementation plan.

‐ 5%

Ongoing

31/05/2018

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020

96% Ongoing

‐

All systems were upgraded to be capable to process ACID data. MIL plan to upgrade their system at Sliač Airport with very low traffic by 01/2020. In this case MIL is considered as "Low key Stakeholder" because there is no impact on overall performance of Slovak ATM system.

31/12/2017

ASP (By:01/2020)

Slovak Air Force

MIL sensors operate with mode 3/A/C (upgrade to Mod‐S planned with acquisition new sensors). ATM surveillance system is ready to share ACID data from civilian sensors.

‐ 92% Ongoing

31/12/2017


Upgrades of the main and back‐up ATM systems were concluded by 1Q/2015.

‐ 100%

Completed

30/04/2015


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

61% Late

‐

The Task Force for the implementation of the Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 was established at the State level in 2010. Members are specialists from MoT, NSA, ANSP and from all relevant data originator´s organisations. The Task Force works in the frame of approved Terms of Reference and the Project Management Plan. Web based application for all data chain is being implemented.

31/12/2018

REG (By:06/2017)

Transport Authority

Data collection procedures, IT security specialists and relevant data originators are actively involved in the Task Force (see State Comment) activities.

‐ 47% Late

31/12/2018

ASP (By:06/2017)


AIM, procedure designers, IT security specialists and relevant data originators are actively involved in the Task Force (see State Comment) activities. Web based application for all data chain has been installed. The new procedures are being developed and the configuration of the application is under development in close cooperation with all relevant data originators.

‐ 80%

Late

30/06/2018

APO (By:06/2017)


Data collection procedures, IT security specialists and relevant data originators are actively involved in the Task Force (see State and ASP Comments). There will be further activities induced once the AIS Web Portal will be ready.

‐ 42%

Late

31/12/2018

ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC air‐ground data link services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

14% Late

‐

Common project for AGDL seamless operations is under consideration in accordance with the SDM Recovery Plan

05/02/2019

REG (By:02/2018)

Transport Authority

Actions will be completed in line with ASP implementation plans.

‐ 33% Late

05/02/2019

ASP (By:02/2018)


Project at LPS started. ‐ 5%

Late

05/02/2019

MIL (By:01/2019)

Slovak Air Force

CPDL will not be implemented on the military transport‐type aircraft.


‐

Ministry of Defence

MIL has not planned yet to implement SES Data Link Services above FL 285 neither Equip transport‐type State aircraft.


‐


ITY‐AGVCS2

8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL 195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

14% Ongoing

‐

Activities related to extension of 8,33 kHz channel spacing below FL 195 are in progress. 31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

Transport Authority

Activities related to extension of 8,33 kHz channel spacing below F L195 are in progress

‐ 55% Ongoing

31/12/2018


Aircraft and CNS equipment has been partially upgraded concerning 8,33 kHz channel spacing capability. All procedures are planned to be accomplished according to requirements.

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)


Activities related to extension of 8,33 kHz channel spacing below FL 195 are in progress. Upgrade plan for renewal of ground radio station includes radio sites operated for Bratislava ACC and Štefánik APP/TWR by 2017. All remaining radio sites for Bratislava ACC and other Slovak airport (LZKZ, LZTT, LZZI and LZPP) will re‐use existing 8,33 kHz radios.

Air‐ground radiocommunication system

13%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

Slovak Air Force

Aircraft and CNS equipment has been partially upgraded concerning 8,33 kHz channel spacing capability. All procedures are planned to be accomplished according to requirements.

‐ 3% Ongoing

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2020)

Slovak Air Force

‐ ‐ 0% No Plan

‐

Ministry of Defence

List of State aircraft that cannot be equipped with 8,33 kHz radios will be communicated to the Commission.

‐ 0% No Plan

‐

APO (By:12/2018)


The implementation projects are planned to be accomplished according to the requirements (at Bratislava airport).

‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2018

ITY‐FMTP

Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

100% Completed

‐

LPS is IPv6 compliant. Connected already to Prague, Budapest and Vienna. Awaiting rest of neighbours to migrate for full implementation.

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2014)


ATM system has been interconnected between Prague, Budapest and Vienna. Awaiting rest of neighbours to migrate for full implementation.

‐ 100%

Completed

30/04/2012

MIL (By:12/2014)

Slovak Air Force

Common ATM system is used for the Civil ‐ Military coordination.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012


ITY‐SPI

Surveillance performance and interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

69% Ongoing

‐

Plan related to safety assessment of the existing surveillance infrastructure has been proposed. NSA is capable to conduct safety oversight.

31/12/2019

REG (By:02/2015)

Transport Authority

NSA is capable to conduct safety oversight. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012

ASP (By:02/2015)


The safety assessment documentation was prepared during SDP system upgrade and it was delivered to NSA.

Radar Sliač 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

MIL (By:06/2020)


The transport aircraft are equipped with Mode S Elementary Surveillance. Equipment of the fighter aircraft is under review. Mode S Enhanced Surveillance and ADS‐B Out avionics are planned only for new aircraft.

‐ 17%

Ongoing

31/12/2019

NAV03

RNAV 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

44% Ongoing

‐

Implementation of RNAV SIDs/STARs within TMAs served for LZIB, LZPP, LZZI, LZTT and LZKZ and deployment of DMEs to support RNAV operations has been started and is planned to be completed by the end of October 2020.

30/10/2020

ASP (By:12/2023)


Implementation of RNAV SIDs/STARs within TMAs served for LZIB, LZPP, LZZI, LZTT and LZKZ and deployment of DMEs to support RNAV operations has been started and is planned to be completed by the end of October 2020.

‐ 44%

Ongoing

30/10/2020

NAV10

APV procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

90% Late

‐

Implementation of APV procedures at LZIB, LZKZ and LZPP completed. Implementation of APV procedures for other airports (LZZI, LZTT) planned by the end of august 2017.

31/08/2017

REG (By:04/2016)

Transport Authority

National regulatory material for APV procedures based on EASA AMC 20‐27 and EASA AMC 20‐28 has been published via AIC A 4/14 30 OCT 2014.

‐ 100% Completed

30/04/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)


Implementation of APV procedures at LZIB, LZKZ and LZPP completed. Implementation of APV procedures for other airport (LZZI, LZTT) planned by the end of august 2017.

‐ 85%

Late

31/08/2017


SAF11

Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018

100% Completed

‐

Measures will be implemented according to European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions.

31/12/2015

REG (By:01/2018)

Transport Authority

Measures will be implemented according to European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015


Appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions were implemented.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

Slovak Air Force

The applicable measures of the Action Plan have been implemented.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015


The applicable measures of the Action Plan have been implemented.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2014)


All activities from European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions, parts 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 are in place. A need for implementation of 3.2.9 was not recognized for the period of next 2 years.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2015


6.3. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress – Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013

100% Completed

‐

Full completion done in 2011. 31/12/2011

ASP (By:01/2013)


Completed in 2011. ‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2011

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

100% Completed

‐

MoT SK is confident with implementation ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1. The current MIL aircraft are out of criteria. There is plan to buy new ones. MIL is considered as "Low key Stakeholder" because in this case there is no impact on overall performance of Slovak ATM system.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

Transport Authority

Transport Authority met the requirements of Reg. 1332/2011 ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)


Completed. ‐ 100%

Completed

30/06/2011

MIL (By:12/2015)


Planned for new aircraft. Current aircraft are out of criteria. There is plan to buy new ones at about end of 2020.

‐ 100% No Plan

‐

FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006

100% Completed

‐

Completed in 2004. (Note: some SLoAs are not applicable since the traffic does not justify automation.) 31/12/2004

ASP (By:07/2014)


Completed in 2004. (Note: some SLoAs are not applicable since the traffic does not justify automation.)

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2004


INF04

Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

Integrated briefing project has been implemented. The application IBAF is running under LPS responsibility together with the coordination of the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMU).

31/12/2010

ASP (By:12/2012)


Integrated briefing project has been implemented. The application IBAF is running under LPS responsibility together with the coordination of the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMU) and according to agreement between MoD and LPS. All criteria detailed in SloA descriptions have been implemented as follows: Integrated briefing function has been implemented with the following conditions accomplished: ‐ Facilities and services with one final application at one terminal; ‐ One single entry of flight details; ‐ All briefing products combined into a single package that may be tailored by request of the user.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2010

Slovak Air Force

Integrated briefing project has been implemented. The application IBAF is running under LPS responsibility together with the coordination of the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMU). Integrated briefing function at Sliač Airport is provided based on the agreement between MoD and LPS.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2010

ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

The services related to COTR are implemented. 31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2012)


‐ ‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2015

MIL (By:12/2012)

Slovak Air Force

CIV MIL coordination is performed by means of common system. There is no intention yet to implement OLDI between civil and military coordination. Flight data exchange systems supporting the coordination procedures between air traffic services units and controlling military units, which operates their own system.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2012


CIV MIL coordination is performed by means of common system. There is no intention yet to implement OLDI between civil and military coordination. Flight data exchange systems supporting the coordination procedures between air traffic services units and controlling military units, which operates their own system.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2012


ANNEXES

Annex A - Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP Focal Point for Slovak Republic LPS SR, š. p. Augustín LAMPRECHT

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA MoT TA

Zdenko BLAŠKO Vojtech ŠPROCH

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP LPS SR, š. p. Tomas ŠPAVELKO

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Airport Bratislava Gabriel DOMŠITZ

LSSIP Focal Point for Military MoD Zdenek BAŠKA

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person for Slovak Republic

DPS/PEPR Agnieszka DYBOWSKA

Implementation Objectives

Implementation

Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners

EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist

AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK TA: Ján SOKOL MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA



AOM21.1 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

AOM21.2 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

AOP04.2 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel


DOMŠITZ

AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ TA: Ján SOKOL

AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC N/A

AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ TA: Ján SOKOL

ATC02.8 B. BAKKER F. ROOSELEER LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC07.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK

ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC15.1 P. CONROY L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC15.2 P. HOP L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU J. PINTO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

COM12 W. JANSSENS J. PINTO TBD

ENV01 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

FCM03 C. BOUMAN O. CIOARA LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Eduard PANÁČEK

FCM04.1 P. HOP O. CIOARA LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK

FCM04.2 P. HOP O. CIOARA LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK MIL: Eduard PANÁČEK

FCM05 I. MENDES VIDEIRA O. CIOARA LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

FCM06 P. HOP F. ROOSELEER LPS SR: Igor URBÁNIK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

FCM07 C. BOUMAN O. ALFARO TBD

FCM08 K. BREIVIK O. CIOARA LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

FCM09 R. STEVENS O. CIOARA TBD

INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO LPS SR: Tomáš FLASSIK TA: Matěj MARETH MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

INF08.1 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO TBD

INF08.2 I. MENDES VIDEIRA A-P. FRANGOLHO TBD

ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO

TA: Matěj Mareth LPS SR: Andrej PENER MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET B. HILL LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Miron MIŠANIČ MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

ITY-SPI M. BORELY O. CIOARA LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Ľubomír SOBOLIČ MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK


ITY-AGDL S. DISSING B. HILL LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Miron MIŠANIČ MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC P. VRANJKOVIC LPS SR: Rastislav PRIMUS MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

NAV10 R. FARNWORTH P. VRANJKOVIC

LPS SR: Rastislav PRIMUS TA: Jaroslav ŠULC MIL: Eduard PANÁČEK

SAF11 S. LAWRENCE F. ROOSELEER

LPS SR: Ivan SELNEKOVIČ TA: Jozef TÓTH MIL: Ján SALAJ


Annex B - National Stakeholders Organisation charts


Annex C - Glossary of Abbreviations

This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP for the Slovak Republic. Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document as mentioned in the Reference Documents.

Term Description

AF ATM Functionality

FT Fast Track

PCP Pilot Common Project

PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme

S-AF Sub ATM Functionality

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SLOVAKIA · LSSIP Year 2016 Slovakia 5 Released Issue...

Documents

Transcript of Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SLOVAKIA · LSSIP Year 2016 Slovakia 5 Released Issue...