Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - CZECH REPUBLIC · LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic...

Level 1 - Implementation Overview

Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - CZECH REPUBLIC

EUROCONTROL

LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic Released Issue

Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Czech Republic

Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/13

Date of Edition 22/05/2018

LSSIP Focal Point T. TRŽICKÝ ‐ [email protected]

LSSIP Contact Person A. DYBOWSKA ‐ [email protected]

Status Released

Intended for Agency Stakeholders

Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2017

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐plan

Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2016

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐report

European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

National AIP http://lis.rlp.cz/ais_data/www_main_control/frm_en_aip.htm

FAB Performance Plan Latest FAB CE Performance Plan V2.0 For details contact: Mr Matej Eljon matej.eljon@fab‐ce.eu

LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic Released Issue

CONTENTS

1. National ATM Environment ............................................................. 5 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................5 1.1. National Stakeholders .........................................................................................7 1.2.

2. Traffic and Capacity ....................................................................... 16 Evolution of traffic in Czech Republic .............................................................. 16 2.1. ACC Prague ....................................................................................................... 17 2.2.

3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 21

4. Implementation Projects ............................................................... 22 National projects .............................................................................................. 22 4.1. FAB projects ..................................................................................................... 23 4.2. Regional projects .............................................................................................. 25 4.3.

5. Cooperation activities .................................................................... 26 FAB Co‐ordination ............................................................................................ 26 5.1. Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 27 5.2.

6. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................. 30 State View......................................................................................................... 30 6.1. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 36 6.2.

Annexes

LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

Civil Aviation in the Czech Republic is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport (MoT).

The National Supervisory Authority (hereinafter referred to as the NSA), is, as per SES Service Provision Regulation, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). The CAA is institutionally separated from the ANSP.

The Military Authorities in the Czech Republic are the Military Aviation Authority of MoD (MAA), the Air Force Development Department of the Capability Development and Planning Division (CDPD) and the Czech Air Force Headquarters. The Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection Division (MAA) is the main regulator for military aviation.

Technical investigations following accidents or serious incidents are carried out by Air Accident Investigation Institute (AAII) which performs its functions independently in compliance with European legislation and reports only to the Government of the Czech Republic. In case of civil‐military accidents / incidents both, civil and military accident / incident investigation authorities have to cooperate. The MoD has its own occurrence reporting and data sharing system.

Traffic and Capacity

Traffic in the FIR Praha increased by 1.8 % during summer 2016 (May to October inclusive) when compared to the same period during 2016. The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year Forecast predicts (for 2017 – 2021) an average annual growth between 0.8% and 4.8%, with a baseline growth of 2.7%.

The average en‐route delay per flight increased from 0.01 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.07 minutes per flight in the Summer 2017.

The capacity gap may be expected in Prague ACC if traffic continues to fly on currents routes during the planning period. In 2019 the preparation for airspace reorganisation (expected in 2019/20) and the new system (expected in 2020/21) will start, and the capacity gap may occur in 2019.

The major international airport of the Czech Republic is Praha/Ruzyně Airport operated by Prague Airport, (Letiště Praha, a. s.) a joint stock company.

Progress per SESAR Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase.

Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.


The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011‐2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.

Pre‐SESAR Implementation

2010 2019

73%

PCP Implementation

2015 2023

18%

Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6.1.3.

Block 0 2010 2018

74%

n/a

66%

7%

Pre‐SESAR

64%

29%

88%

79%

14%

Pre‐SESAR

Pre‐SESAR

Pre‐SESAR

PCP

PCP

PCP

PCP

Optimised ATM Network Services

Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing

Airport Operations

Enabling Aviation Infrastructure


ATM Deployment Outlook

State objectives

Deployed in 2016‐2017: ‐ Data Link [ITY‐AGDL] 100% progress ‐ 8,33 kHz below FL195 [ITY‐AGVCS2] 100% progress

‐ Enhanced STCA for TMAs [ATC02.9] 95% progress ‐ Collaborative Flight Planning [FCM03] 84% progress ‐ STCA En‐Route [ATC02.2] 68% progress ‐ eTOD [INF07] 65% progress ‐ AMAN to en‐route [ATC15.1] 63% progress ‐ Ground‐Based Safety Nets [ATC02.8] 63% progress ‐ Traffic Complexity [FCM06] 30% progress ‐ Aeronautical Information [ITY‐ADQ] 22% progress ‐ STAM Phase 2 [FCM04.2] 5% progress

‐ Coordination and transfer [ATC17] 48% progress ‐ AMHS [COM10] 33% progress

‐ Surveillance Performance & Interoperability [ITY‐SPI] 71% progress ‐ Voice over IP [COM11] 68% progress ‐ Runway excursions [SAF11] 18% progress ‐ NewPENS [COM12] 0% progress

‐ MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 26% progress ‐ Free Route Airspace [AOM21.2] 15% progress ‐ ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 10% progress ‐ Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 3% progress ‐ Real‐Time Airspace Data [AOM19.2] 0% progress

Airport objectives – LKPR ‐ Praha Airport

‐ AMAN [ATC07.1] 0% progress

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players ‐ civil and military ‐ and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;

Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;

Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;

Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high‐level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017. In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.

The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


1. National ATM Environment

Geographical Scope 1.1.

International Membership

Czech Republic is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC 1993 (1991*)

EUROCONTROL 1996

European Union 2004

EASA 2004

ICAO 1993 (1944*)

NATO 1999

ITU 1993 (1918*)

* as Czechoslovakia

Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses the Czech Republic FIR Praha. The Czech Republic FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States, namely Germany UIR Rhein and FIR München; Poland with FIR Warszawa, Slovak Republic with FIR Bratislava and Austria with FIR Wien (see Figure 1).

Vertical limits of FIR Praha are ground level and FL 660.

The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL 245.

The controlled airspace of FIR Praha comprises:

• 4 Control Areas (CTA), CTA Praha from 1000ft AGL to FL660, CTA Karlovy Vary, CTA Brno, CTA Ostrava, from 1000ft AGL to FL125, with the exception of TMA / CTR and MTMA / MCTR;

• TMAs / CTRs;

• MTMAs / MCTRs


Figure 1: Praha FIR and neighbouring FIR’s

Airspace Classification and Organisation

The Czech Republic is following the ICAO classification. The Figure below shows the classification of Airspace of the FIR Praha and CTA Praha. The Czech Republic has implemented ICAO Class C above FL095 to FL660. See Figure 2.

Figure 2: FIR Praha airspace classification


National Stakeholders 1.2.

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Czech Republic are the following:

‐ The Ministry of Transport (MoT) and the Civil Aviation Department (CAD) of the Ministry of Transport;

‐ The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) which acts as a National Supervisory Authority (NSA);

‐ The Air Accidents Investigation Institute (AAII);

‐ The Institute of Aviation Medicine, Ústav leteckého zdravotnictví (ÚLZ) is an independent State Agency;

‐ The Ministry of Defence (MoD);

The Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection Division (MAA);

The Air Force Development Department of the Capability Development and Planning Division (CDPD);

‐ The Czech Air Force;

‐ The Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic (ANS CR) is the main ANS provider;

‐ The Prague Airport, Joint Stock Company is the operator of the major airport Praha‐Ruzyně.

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the chart below.

Ministry of Defence

GOVERNMENT

Ministry of Transport (Civil Aviation Department)

Air Accidents Investigation Institute

Civil Aviation Authority

Air Navigation Services

of the Czech Republic

Prague Airport

Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection

Division of MoD

Institute of Aviation Medicine

Other Airport Operators

Other ATC Providers

Civil Aircraft Operators

Czech Air Force

Air Force Development of the Capability Development and Planning Division ‐ MoD


Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

Civil Aviation in the Czech Republic is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport (MoT).

An organisational chart of the Czech Republic Aviation structure, the CAA, the AAII, the ANS CR and Prague Airport is in Annex B.

The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis

Rule‐making Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.

Safety Oversight NSA (CAA) Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.

Enforcement actions in case of non‐compliance with safety regulatory requirements

NSA (CAA) Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.

Airspace NSA (CAA) and MoD

(close cooperation with approval of both organisations)

Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.

Economic Ministry of Transport (MoT) acts as an Economic Regulator in the field of unit rates.


Environment Ministry of Health / Regional Hygienic Stations

Ministry of Environment

Act No. 2/1969 Coll.

Act No. 258/ 2000 Coll.

Act No. 173/1989 Coll.

Security CAA/Ministry of Transport (MoT)

(CAA fully acts as a responsible authority according to EU Reg. 300/2008; MoT acts as a policy maker and holds chairmanships in Intragovernmental Commission for Aviation Security)


Accident investigation Air Accidents Investigation Institute (AAII)



CAA

The National Supervisory Authority (NSA), as per SES Service Provision Regulation, is the CAA. The CAA is institutionally separated from the ANSP and has been nominated by the Czech Aviation Act No. 49/1997 Coll. as the National Supervisory Authority (NSA).

Annual Report published: Y CAA Annual Reports (in Czech only):

http://www.caa.cz/urad/vyrocni‐zpravy

Website: www.caa.cz

The organisational chart of the CAA is in Annex B.


Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic (ANS CR)

Services provided

Governance: State enterprise Ownership: 100% Ministry of Transport

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en‐route Y

ATC approach Y Partly; APP Service is provided in TMA Praha, Ostrava‐Mosnov, Brno‐Turany and Karlovy Vary

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y Partly; TWR service is provided at Praha‐Ruzyně, Ostrava‐Mosnov, Brno‐Turany and Karlovy Vary

AIS Y Only civil side

CNS Y

MET N MET service is provided by the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute re‐certified in 4/2017 by NSA (valid indefinitely)

ATCO training Y

Others N

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y ATC services are provided for small parts of Polish, German and Austrian airspace around states boundaries. See AIP CR accessible at http://lis.rlp.cz/ais_data/www_main_control/frm_en_aip.htm

Annual Report published: Y http://www.rlp.cz/en/company/performance/Pages/reports.aspx

Website: www.ans.cz

The organisation chart is in Annex B.

ATC systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 N ‐

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales – EUROCAT 2000 system (main system on EC position)

CS SOFT – ESUP (main FDP system)

ICC – IDP/WALDO (main system on PC position and backup system for EC, main system for APP of regional airports)

Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Regular updates twice per year

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? Public tender for the new system finished in 2014. Operation of the new system planned for 2021.

ATC Unit ACC Praha, APP Praha,

APP/TWR of regional airports

1Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: EUROCONTROL – ARTAS (main SDPS)

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Finalization of hardware upgrade planned for 2018,

Software upgrade performed regularly based on a new SW version provided by EUROCONTROL.

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? N/A

ATC Unit ACC Praha, APP Praha

ATC Units

The ATC units in the Czech Republic airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En‐route TMA

Praha ACC 10/12* ‐ FIR Praha MIL ACC terminated, provision of en‐

route services was transferred to ANS CR since May 2014

Praha APP ‐ 4 Praha‐Ruzyně

Brno APP 1 1 Brno‐Tuřany

Karlovy Vary APP 1 1 Karlovy Vary

Ostrava APP 1 1 Ostrava‐Mošnov

MIL APP ‐ 4 Čáslav, Náměšť, Kbely, Pardubice

* 10 sectors opened during peaks in summer 2017; 12 sectors are technically available in ACC Prague.


Airports

General information

The major international airport of the Czech Republic is Praha‐Ruzyně Airport operated by Prague Airport, (Letiště Praha, a. s.) a joint stock company.

Other smaller airports such as Brno‐Tuřany, Ostrava‐Mošnov and Karlovy Vary have been progressively transferred to respective regional governments.

Brno‐Tuřany Airport was leased to a private operator Letiště Brno, a.s. on 1st July 2002, followed by Ostrava‐Mošnov Airport (leased to Letiště Ostrava, a.s.) and Karlovy Vary (leased to Letiště Karlovy Vary, s.r.o.) on 1st July 2004.

There are two industry airports, AERO‐Vodochody Plc in Vodochody (airport Prague Vodochody) and Aircraft Industries Plc in Kunovice.

There is one military airport with civil traffic operations in Pardubice.

Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives. So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP: Praha‐Ruzyně (known as Václav Havel Airport Prague, LKPR). The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/LKPR

Military Authorities

The Military Authorities involved in ATM in Czech Republic are composed of:

‐ The Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection Division of MoD (MAA);

‐ The Air Force Development Department of the Capability Development and Planning Division MoD (CDPD);

‐ The Air Force Headquarters.

Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.

An organisational chart of the Czech Republic Aviation structure is in Annex B.


Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule‐making

Oversight

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

Y

Level of such legal provision: State Law and Ministerial Decree

Level of such legal provision: State Law and Ministerial Decree

Authority signing such legal provision: the President of the CR, Prime Minister, Chairman of Parliament and Minister of Defence

Authority signing such legal provision: the President of the CR, Prime Minister, Chairman Parliament and Minister of Defence

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y

OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y

ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification Y

ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Y

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability Y

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: ‐ Additional Information: Special agreements between MoD and MoT exist that cover the responsibilities; ongoing process

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP Y

National Military AIP Y National Military AIP Y

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N

Other: CENOR FLIP (Central and Northern Region Flight Information Publication)

Y Other: N

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: MAA, Czech Air Force Headquarters

NSA (as per SES Reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: MAA

Additional information: None Additional information: MoD is an oversight body according to Civil aviation act.


Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N If YES, since: ‐ Duration of the Certificate:

‐

Certificate issued by: ‐ If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

Y

Additional Information: None

User role

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En‐Route Y MIL (limited, GCI only)* En‐Route N

Approach/TMA Y MIL ANSP (MAPPs) Approach/TMA Y

Airfield/TWR/GND Y MIL ANSP (MTWR) Airfield/TWR/GND Y

AIS Y MIL AIS Y

MET Y MIL MET Y

SAR Y Integrated civil military SAR Y

TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y

Other: ‐ Other: ‐

Additional Information:

Tactical co‐ordination with Air Defence (AD) unit

* GCI ‐ Ground Control Intercept unit

Additional Information: Above information are concerned of military services provided basically for State aircraft, in specific cases (joint used airports, etc.) also for civil traffic.

FIS is provided by AD ATC unit only, no specific working position is established.

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N

Within the regular (GAT) national route network N Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system N Under radar advisory service N

If Military fly GAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges N

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y

CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y

Others: Above mentioned CNS exemptions are applied case by case to state aircraft when requested in the flight plan.


Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Military in CZ applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




2. Traffic and Capacity

Evolution of traffic in Czech Republic 2.1.

2017

Traffic in the Czech Republic increased by 1.8% during Summer 2017 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2016.

2018‐2022

The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year Forecast predicts an average annual growth between 0.8% and 4.8%, with a baseline growth of 2.7%.

0

200.000

400.000

600.000

800.000

1.000.000

1.200.000

2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F

IFR

flig

hts

Czech Republic - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast

2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 FH 3.8% 7.2% 4.9% 4.6% 3.8% 3.4% 2.7%B 3.1% 6.5% 6.9% 3.4% 5.0% 2.4% 2.3% 1.9% 2.1% 2.1%L 2.9% 3.0% -0.2% 0.7% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3%

ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017)IFR flights yearly growth

Czech Republic


ACC Prague 2.2.

Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022

Performance summer 2017

Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer Capacity

gap Ref value Actual

+1.5 % 187 (+3%) 0.16 0.07 No

The average en‐route delay per flight increase from 0.01 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.07 minutes per flight in the Summer 2017.

62% of the delays were due to Weather, 29% were for the reason ATC Capacity and 8% due to ATC Staffing.

Capacity Plan: +0% Achieved Comments

Additional FRA DCTs Yes

Improved coordination with military Yes

Improved flow and capacity management techniques, including STAM

Yes

Improved ATS route network Yes Implementation in Nov. 2017

Enhanced sectorisation according to the FABCE Airspace Plan Yes Implementation in Nov. 2017 at the

interface with Austria

CPDLC Yes

Optimised opening schemes Yes

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Peak Day Traffic 2358 2416 2561 2690 2731

Summer Traffic 2063 2120 2280 2403 2440

Yearly Traffic* 1804 1849 1976 2098 2204

Summer Traffic Forecast 2516 2588 2642 2695 2755

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 2576 2699 2822 2937 3038

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 2466 2466 2486 2496 2502

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.07

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LKAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017


Datalink Yes

Adaptation of sector opening times depending on available staff Yes

Monitoring of traffic evolution and evaluation of possible scenarios Yes

Maximum configuration: 9/10 sectors Yes 10 sectors were opened

Summer 2017 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS and was assessed to be at 187. The peak 1 hour demand was 180 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 169 flights.

Planning Period 2018‐2022

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

Capacity Profiles

ACC 2017

baseline

Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)

2018 2019

LKAA 187

H 187 0% 187 0%

Ref. 187 0% 187 0%

L 187 0% 187 0%

Open 187 0% 187 0%

C/R 193 3% 197 2%

Summer Capacity Plan

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Free Route Airspace Full FRA

Impl. in Dec 2021

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

ASM tool (equiv. to LARA)

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management Improved flow and capacity management

techniques, including STAM

Airspace

Improved ATS route network

New

sectorisation

Procedures

Staffing Additional controllers Additional controllers

Technical Implementation of a new system

Capacity Adaptation of sector opening times depending on available staff

Significant Events

Reconstruction of the OPS room and implementation of the new

ATM system

Training for the new

sectorisation

Training for the new system

Training for the FRA


Max sectors 10 10 13 13 15

Planned Annual Capacity Increase

0% 0% 2% 1% 2%

Reference Profile Annual % Increase

0% 0% N/A N/A N/A

Current Routes Profile % Increase

3% 2% N/A N/A N/A

Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile

0.0% 0.0% N/A N/A N/A

Difference Capacity Plan v. Current Routes Profile

‐3.1% ‐5.1% N/A N/A N/A

Annual Reference Value (min) 0.10 0.10 N/A N/A N/A

Summer reference value (min) 0.16 0.16 N/A N/A N/A

Additional information

The training for the new sectorisation and the implementation will be subject of the transition planning process in 2019/20. From 2020 the OPS room will be split into two parts with the maximum number of 10 sectors available for the current ATM system. However, the new sectorisation will deliver three additional sectors in 2020 in a lower airspace (3 terminal sectors up to FL 285 served from regional ATC Units). The migration to the new system is planned for winter season 2020/21. The capacity availability throughout the project lifecycle will be subject the transition planning process.

The graphs above shows an outline of available sector configurations for a typical weekday and a weekend day for summer 2018.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018Mon. ‐Wed.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018Thu. ‐ Fri.


2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook

The capacity gap may be expected in Prague ACC if traffic continues to fly on currents routes during the planning period.

In 2019 the preparation for airspace reorganisation (expected in 2019/20) and the new system (expected in 2020/21) will start, and the capacity gap may occur in 2019.

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 187 187

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 187 187

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 193 197

Capacity Profile ‐ High 187 187

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 187 187

Capacity Baseline 181 187

2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 187 187 191 193 197

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

Cap

acity profile (movements per hour)

LKAAACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions

Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to the Czech Republic for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Conclusion Applicable to VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT

ROUTING.

THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS.

(page 14 of the Report)

All State that are

implementing

AOM21.1 and

AOM21.2 State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES

Description of the planned action: Objective AOM21.1 is completed. As for objective AOM21.2, the

completion is planned for 2021.

Conclusion Applicable to ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY

CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) All States + EC

State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES

Description of the planned action: Further implementation of ADQ requirements depends on successful

upgrade of AIM system, which is planned for 2018.


4. Implementation Projects

National projects 4.1.

The main projects currently ongoing in Czech Republic are depicted in the table below.

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:

AMHS ASP ANS CR (CZ) Start: 2011 Finish: 1/2018

Compeleted L3: COM10

AOP / APOC Prague Airport (CZ) ‐ ‐ ‐

Aeronautical Information Distribution Service (2015_243_AF5)

ASP ANS CR (CZ) 01/06/2016 ‐ 31/12/2018 ‐ DP2016: 201_243_AF5

Airport CDM ASP ANS CR (CZ), Prague Airport (CZ) Start: 2008 Finish 2015

Completed in 2015 L3: AOP05

Conversion to the 8.33 kHz channel spacing below FL195

ASP ANS CR (CZ), MIL ASP (CZ), Prague Airport (CZ)

Start: 2016 Finish: 11/2017

Completed L3: ITY‐AGVCS2

Flexible ASM and Free Route (2015_239_AF3)

ASP ANS CR (CZ) 01/03/2016 ‐ 01/12/2021 ‐ DP2016: 2015_239_AF3

Free Route implementation into ATM system of ANS CR (2015_242_AF3)

ASP ANS CR (CZ) 01/03/2016 ‐ 04/11/2021 ‐ DP2016: 2015_242_AF3

Meteorological Information Exchange Service (2015_241_AF5)

ASP ANS CR (CZ) 01/03/2016 ‐ 01/12/2020 ‐ DP2016: 2015_241_AF5

NEOPTERYX ‐ the new DPS system for ACC/APP Praha

ASP ANS CR (CZ) Start 2010 Finish 2021

Ongoing ‐



RET J Prague Airport (CZ) Start: 2019, End: 2019 ‐ ‐

RET Y Prague Airport (CZ) ‐ ‐ ‐

RWY 06R/24L Prague Airport (CZ) Start: 2021 Finish: 2024

Preparatory phase. The EIA process is completed.

‐

Traffic Complexity Tools (2015_240_AF4)

ASP ANS CR (CZ) 15/02/2016 ‐ 31/12/2018 ‐ DP2016: 2015_240_AF4

VoIP ASP ANS CR (CZ), CDPD (CZ), CZ Air Force (CZ)

Start 2007 Finish 2020

Ongoing L3: COM11

pRWY Prague Airport (CZ) ‐ ‐ ‐

FAB projects 4.2.

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links:

FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free Route Airspace Study) (FAB CE Project 1)

ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI)

Project 1: Start 3.1.2011, End: Continuous Project 1 FAB CE FRA Study: Start: 1.9.2015, End: 21.4.2017

FAB CE FRA Study is completed Other activities, including monitoring FRA implementation, are ongoing

L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2

RP2 PP: FAB CE FRA Project (described under NSP actions 'FAB CE Airspace and route structure planning' and 'Free Route Airspace')

DP2016: 102AF3 – Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea


Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links:

FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM (FAB CE DAM/STAM Study)


DAM/STAM Study: Start: 7.2.2017, End: 31.12.2018

Ongoing L3: AOM19.1, AOM19.2, AOM19.3, FCM04.1, FCM04.2, FCM05, FCM06

RP2 PP: Advanced Airspace Management (described under NSP actions)

DP2016: 2016_075_AF3_A

FAB CE wide Study of DAM and STAM (PCP under CEF2016 Call)

Surveillance Infrastructure Optimisation (FAB CE Project 18)


Start: 6.7.2016, End: 28.2.2018 Ongoing, in the finalization phase

RP2 PP: Optimisation of CNS resources

X‐Bone HW Procurement (FAB CE Project 17)

ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI)

Start: 19.2.2016, End: 30.4.2018 Common procurement finalized, in the implementation phase

RP2 PP: Optimisation of CNS resources


Regional projects 4.3.


AMAN LOWW initial (AMAN LOWW initial)

ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové slu by Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)

Start: 2.1.2016 End: 31.12.2020

Ongoing L3: ATC07.1, ATC15.1 DP2016: 2015_234_AF1 AMAN LOWW initial RP2 PP: Project taken into account under 3.1.(c).(ii) ‐ Capacity KPI #2: Terminal and airport ANS ATFM arrival delay per flight

Extended AMAN in Czech Airspace (2015_196_AF1_B)

ASP ANS CR (CZ), Belgocontrol (BE), DSNA (FR), LVNL ‐ Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland (NL), MUAC ANSP (MAS), Skyguide (CH)

15/02/2016 ‐ 31/12/2020 ‐ DP2016: 2015_196_AF1_B

Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study (GO FRA OF Study)

ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), BULATSA (BG), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové slu by Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), M‐NAV (MK), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL), ROMATSA (RO), SMATSA (BA), Slovenia Control (SI)

Start: 1.9.2017, End: 30.11.2019 Planned CEF Application is being finalised under CEF Call 2016

L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2 DP2016: CEF Application will be submitted as a part of PCP under CEF2016 Call


5. Cooperation activities

FAB Co‐ordination 5.1.

Having signed and ratified the Agreement on the Establishment of Functional Airspace Block Central Europe, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia are part of FAB CE.

The FAB CE States agreed on establishment of the following permanent bodies ‐ the FAB CE Council, NSA Coordination Committee and Joint Civil‐Military Airspace Coordination Committee. The FAB CE Council can also establish other bodies necessary for the implementation, operation and further development of the FAB CE Project. For this reason the FAB CE Legal Committee and the FAB CE Performance Body (responsible for preparation of FAB CE Performance Plan for RP2) have been established.

The air navigation service providers of the FAB CE countries established a joint company FABCE Aviation Services, Ltd already in 2014 and the company is responsible for the professional management of various regional air navigation projects. The establishment of this joint venture is not only effectively aiming at the progress of the FAB CE programme, but at the same time the Single European Sky programme of the European Union.

In 2016, there was a major update of the FAB CE Strategy. The FAB CE Strategic Objectives, defined in this version of the Strategy, cover the period until 2020, and address also the FAB CE long term strategic vision. This was followed by the update of the FAB CE High Level Plan which provides the link how the FAB CE intends to achieve full compliance with the Deployment Programme and achievement of all strategic goals through cooperation’s, projects and tasks. This is done by assessing existing gaps between the present state of implementation activities and the SESAR DP and by pointing towards activities and initiatives established to close those ‘gaps’ and reach achievement of all the high‐level targets. The High Level Plan is going through regular updates on an annual basis.

In addition to FAB CE projects, the FAB CE ANSPs coordinate also their regional Free Route Airspace initiatives including South Eastern Europe Night Free Route Airspace (SEEN FRA) involving Hungary and DANUBE FAB, SEAFRA (South‐East Axis Free Route Airspace) involving Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia and SAXFRA (Slovenian Austrian Cross Border Free Route Airspace). In 2017, the ANSPs worked hard on merging the SEAFRA and SAXFRA initiatives into the South East Common Sky Initiative Free Route Airspace (SECSI FRA) which has been successfully implemented, with the support of the Network Manager.

FAB CE continues to actively cooperate and share information and lessons learnt with other FABs. In 2017, FAB CE participated in a number of inter‐FAB workshops, including Inter‐FAB communications workshop in Langen, Inter‐FAB Point of Contact (PoC) workshop in Malta and Inter‐FAB operational workshop organised by FAB CE in Ljubljana. FAB CE also continues to coordinate its activities with other ANSPs of the Gate One initiative consisting of three FABs (Baltic FAB, DANUBE FAB and FAB CE) and two non‐EU ANSPs (MNAV and SMATSA).


Regional cooperation 5.2.

Regional cooperation initiatives

The Czech Republic is involved in international activities in the field of ATM like the EATM and NM

developments. The ANS of CR actively participates in a number of working teams of international organisation

(e.g. EUROCONTROL, CANSO), Co‐operation and co‐ordination exists with bordering ECAC States (Austria,

Germany, Poland, and the Slovak Republic) especially on the field of airspace design. In order to achieve some

of the ATM MP L3 Implementation Objectives, Praha ACC will have to co‐ordinate some of its actions with a

number of foreign adjacent ACCs/UAC. Military regional coordination within NATO environment (Germany,

Poland and Slovak Republic) is based on common NATO procedures.

The Czech Republic has been involved in a process of establishing a more formalized framework in the field of

cross‐border provision of air navigation services with two of its neighbouring countries: Germany and Poland.

In each case, the ultimate goal is to have a three‐layer scheme of agreements: on the level of (i) states, (ii)

ANSPs and (iii) NSAs. Still, the process of concluding a bilateral international treaty approved by a law‐making

body is generally a lengthy and difficult one. Therefore, for sake of flexibility, the countries involved opted for

a more flexible solution.

In December 2014, relevant agreements were concluded on the level of Czech and German NSAs as well as

ANSPs (ANS CR and DFS) even before the state level treaty would be finalized. Similar agreement was

subsequently concluded also between Czech and Polish NSAs in December 2015.

The Agreement between Czech and German NSAs (as well as the agreement between the Czech and Polish

NSAs) provide for mutual cooperation of the relevant bodies concerning supervision of cross‐border provision

of ANS. It covers in particular exchange of information, procedures for joint supervision and mutual

recognition of supervisory tasks. The Agreement is intended to fulfill requirements of Art. 2(5) of Regulation

(EC) 550/2004.

The two ANSP level agreements between ANS CR and DFS represent agreements within the sense of Art. 10(2)

and (3) of Regulation (EC) 550/2004. They are complex arrangements between the providers covering cross‐

border provision of ANS, including, e.g., procedures and principles for compliance with applicable rules,

occurrence reporting, notifications, liability or insurance.

B4 Consortium

B4 Consortium was set up formally on 8 September 2014 by PANSA (Poland), ANS CR (Czech Republic), LPS SR

(Slovak Republic) and „Oro navigacija” (Lithuania) representing small and medium‐sized European Air

Navigation Service Providers.

The B4 Consortium is a member of A6+ on SESAR 2020 Programme content. As outcome of SJU membership

negotiation the B4 Consortium has become a member of SJU from July 6, 2016.

By the end of 2016 the B4 Consortium has started elaborating Industrial research projects within the SJU. The

outcomes of the commonly financed projects are expected to pave the way towards the new generation air

traffic management system capable of ensuring improved safety and efficiency of air transport in Europe.


B4 Consortium considers the vast expertise of its members in ATM operational and technical domains, Project

and Quality management and experience in execution of several high complexity ATM projects as well as the

expertise and experience of its Linked Third Parties ranging from scientific research, concept developments, up

to product prototyping and manufacturing highly beneficial for the successful accomplishment of the SESAR

2020 program objectives.

B4 Consortium together with its Linked Third Parties can see its role in SESAR 2020 Projects not only in

eliminating current absence of small and medium‐sized ANSPs in the SESAR projects but also in bringing

different experiences and approaches to the SESAR 2020 programme by providing the SJU with its broadly

experienced and highly motivated staff and well‐equipped facilities.

Regional projects

Project MALORCA

ANS CR has been actively involved in SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research project called MALORCA (Machine

Learning of Speech Recognition Models for Controller Assistance) since April 1, 2016. ANS CR is one of five

beneficiaries involved in this projects (other member of Consortium are DLR – Germany (Coordinator), USAAR ‐

Germany, IDIAP ‐ Switzerland and Austrocontrol – Austria).

In 2017, the ABSR (Assistant Based Speech Recognition) prototype created by DLR and USAAR was

demonstrated at the 1st MALORCA Stakeholder workshop in Prague (2017‐04‐12) organized by ANS CR. Its

purpose was to get early feedback from the users, i.e. the controllers and speech recognition/machine learning

experts, with respect to the planned proof‐of‐concept trials. The feedback was used to improve the prototype,

and was demonstrated again to controllers at pre‐proof‐of‐concept trials in Prague (2017‐10‐10). The main

work of ANS CR was focussed on Work package 5 – Proof of Concept, preparation of proof‐of‐concept trials

planned in January 2018, where the hypothesis that unsupervised learning will improve command recognition

rates and reduce the adaptation costs was set as the main objective.

INEA CEF Call 2014 projects with ANS CR contribution

Project ID Project Name Project Leader / Contributors (if any)

Project Duration

102AF3 Free Route Airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea

HCL / ANS CR + FAB CE ANSPs 1.9.2015 ‐ 21.4.2017




Project Duration

2015_234_AF1_B AMAN LOWW initial ACG / ANS CR + LPS + HCL 1.3.2016 ‐ 31.12.2018

2015_196_AF1_B* Extended AMAN in Czech airspace

ANS CR / DFS+others(separate proposal)

1.2.2016 ‐ 31.12.2017

2015_239_AF3 Flexible ASM and Free Route ANS CR 1.3.2016 ‐ 1.12.2020

2015_242_AF3 Free Route implementation into ATM system of ANS CR

ANS CR 1.3.2016 ‐ 31.3.2020

2015_240_AF4 Traffic Complexity Tools ANS CR 15.2.2016 ‐ 31.12.2018

2015_174_AF5_B NewPENS Stakeholders contribution for the procurement and deployment of NewPENS

EUROCONTROL / ANS CR + others 15.2.2016 ‐ 31.12.2020

2015_243_AF5 Aeronautical Information Distribution Service

ANS CR 1.6.2016 ‐ 31.12.2018

2015_145_AF5_B AIM Deployment Toolkit EUROCONTROL / ANS CR + others 1.4.2016 ‐ 31.12.2020

2015_241_AF5 Meteorological Information Exchange Service

ANS CR / CHMI (Czech Hydrometeorological Institute)

1.3.2016 ‐ 1.12.2020

2015‐EU‐TM‐0242‐W

Deployment of harmonised and interoperable high Performance European Surveillance System

EUROCONTROL / ANS CR + NAV Portugal

1.3.2016 ‐ 31.12.2020



Project Duration

2016_075_AF3_B FAB CE wide Study of DAM and

STAM ‐ Cohesion Call FAB CE Ltd/ ANS CR + other FAB CE ANSPs

7.2.2017 ‐ 31.12.2018

2016_064_AF5 AIMSIL ‐ AIM Systems Integration Layer

ANS CR 1.5.2017 ‐ 30.11.2020

2016_065_AF5 SWIM implementation into ATS INFO/ARO system of ANS CR

ANS CR 1.9.2017 ‐ 1.12.2020


6. Implementation Objectives Progress

State View 6.1.

Overall Objective Implementation

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

A number of ESSIP objectives have been already completed: AOM13.1 (Harmonise Operational Air Traffic

(OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling), AOM21.1 (Direct Routing), AOP04.1 (Implement ASMGC Level1),

AOP04.2 (Implement A‐SMGCS Level 2), AOP05 (Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)),

ENV02 (Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports), FCM04.1 (Short Term ATFCM

Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1), ITY‐ACID (Aircraft identification), ITY‐AGDL (Initial ATC Air‐ground Data Link

Services), ITY‐AGVCS2 (8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195), ITY‐FMTP (Apply a common

flight message transfer protocol), NAV03.1 (RNAV 1 in TMA Operations), NAV10 (APV procedures), ATC16

(Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1), FCM01 (Implement enhanced tactical flow

management services), INF04 (Implement integrated briefing), ITY‐COTR (Implementation of ground‐ground

automated co‐ordination processes); from which FCM04.1, ITY‐AGDL and ITY AGVCS2 were completed during

the last LSSIP cycle.

With regard to objectives due for 2015–2017 and earlier, the Czech Republic is late in implementing objectives

ATC02.2 (Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route

operations) and ATC02.8 (Ground‐based Safety Nets) which are both implemented for the main ATC units

(Prague ACC/APP), APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary, but implementation at APP Brno is planned to be

completed by 2018, ATC15.1 (Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN) where basic algorithm

of production of AMA message is implemented in our en‐route system, but operational use depends on

implementation of AMAN system in Munich, Vienna and other airports. Also FCM03 (Collaborative Flight

Planning) is late – AFP messages were technically implemented and operational internal tests and tests with

NM are planned for 2018. Furthermore ITY‐ADQ (Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical

Information) is late, but there is a plan for implementation for 2018.

17; 37%

8; 18%

2; 4%

11; 24%

8; 17%

Completed

Ongoing

Planned

Late

No Plan

Not Applicable

Missing Data

Undefined


Plans for completing Objectives, especially those due for 2018 and 2019: AOP11 (Initial Airport Operations

Plan) is ongoing with expected completion in 2019, AOP12 (Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with

Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC)) is

ongoing with planned completion in 2018, ATC02.8 (Ground‐Based Safety Nets) planned for 2018 and ATC02.9

(Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs) both objectives are ongoing and planned for 2018,

ATC15.1 (Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN) planned for 2018, ATC17 (Electronic

Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer) planned for 2019, COM10

(Migrate from AFTN to AMHS) planned for 2019, FCM03 (Collaborative Flight Planning) planned for 2018,

FCM04.2 (Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2) is ongoing and planned for completion in 2018,

FCM06 (Traffic Complexity Assessment) is ongoing and planned for completion in 2018, INF07 (Electronic

Terrain and Obstacle Data) planned for 2018, ITY‐ADQ (Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical

Information) planned for 2018, ATC02.2 (Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert

(STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations) is also planned for 2018.

Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature

Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C.

Legend:

## % = Expected completion / % Progress = ESSIP Timeline (different colour per KF)

100% = Objective Completed = Completion beyond ESSIP Timeline


<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

100%

AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA 10%

AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data 0%

AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing

0%

-

FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services 100%

FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 84%

FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 100%

FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 5%

FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP 3%

FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment 30%


Advanced Air Traffic Services

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing 100%

AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace 15%

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Local objective 0%

-

ATC02.2 STCA En‐Route 68%

ATC02.8 Ground‐Based Safety Nets 63%

ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs 95%

ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures

LKPR ‐ Praha Airport 0%

ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring

26%

ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN

63%

ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace

0%

-

ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 100%

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

48%

ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Local objective 0%

-

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations

LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)

n/a

ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective

LKPR ‐ PRAHA/RUZYNE - 0%

ITY‐COTR Ground‐Ground Automated Co‐ordination Processes

100%

NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100%

NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations 0%

-

NAV10 APV procedures 100%

NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft

Local objective 0%

-


High Performing Airport Operations

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1


AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2


AOP05 Airport CDM


AOP10 (PCP) Time‐Based Separation


n/a

AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan


9%

AOP12 (PCP) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring


35%

AOP13 (PCP) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing


n/a

ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management


SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions

18%



<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 33%

COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 68%

COM12 (PCP) NewPENS 0%

FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 0%

-

INF04 Integrated Briefing 100%

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 65%

ITY‐ACID Aircraft Identification 100%

ITY‐ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information

22%

ITY‐AGDL Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services 100%

ITY‐AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195

100%

ITY‐FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100%

ITY‐SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 71%


ICAO ASBU Implementation

The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.

These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).

Legend:

= Completed (during 2017 or before)

= Missing planning date

= Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance

100%

B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2)

100%

B0‐FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground‐Ground Integration

100%

83%

B0‐DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management

100%

61%

B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%

B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets

100%

79%

B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through 100%

B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)

100%

32%

B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories

100%

70%

B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network‐Wide view

100%

92%

B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%

71%

B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)

B0‐TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En‐Route

100%


Detailed Objectives Implementation progress 6.2.

Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C.

Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

Completed No Plan

Ongoing Not Applicable

Planned Missing Data

Late


Main Objectives

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

100% Completed

‐

Completed as of May 1, 2014. (establishment of integrated CIV‐MIL ACC). 31/12/2014

REG (By:12/2018)

MoT CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

MAA ‐ ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2018)

CZ Air Force Completed as of May 1, 2014 (establishment of integrated CIV‐MIL ACC).

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

MIL (By:12/2018)

CZ Air Force ‐ ‐ 100% Completed

‐


31/12/2012

AOM19.1

ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

10% Late

‐

ASP: Improved ASM/ATFCM process, ASP plans the implementation of remaining SLOAs for 2021. MoD participates on national level of implementation of these objectives. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2018)

CZ Air Force MoD participates on national level of implementation of these objectives.

‐ 10% Late

31/12/2021

CDPD MoD participates on national level of implementation of these objectives.

‐ 10% Late

31/12/2021

ASP ANS CR Improved ASM/ATFCM process, ASP plans the implementation of remaining SLOAs for 2021.

FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace

Management (DAM) and

STAM

10%

Late

31/12/2021


AOM19.2

ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ASP ANS CR Planned for 2021 (according to SDM).



STAM

0%

Planned

31/12/2021

AOM19.3

Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% No Plan

‐


‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

ASP ANS CR ‐



STAM

0%

No Plan

‐


AOM21.1

Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed

‐

FRA has been implemented since February 5, 2015. See also FAB CE projects context ‐ details in Chapter 5.

05/02/2015

ASP (By:12/2017)

ASP ANS CR FRA has been implemented since February 5, 2015.

FAB CE Strategic

Operational Planning

Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free

Route Airspace Study) / Gate One Free Route Airspace

Operational Framework

Study

100%

Completed

05/02/2015

AOM21.2

Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

15% Ongoing

‐

Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects – see details in Chapter 5. 04/11/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ASP ANS CR Elementary FRA feasibility study was created.

FAB CE Strategic

Operational Planning

Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free

Route Airspace Study) / Gate One Free Route Airspace

Operational Framework

Study

15%

Ongoing

04/11/2021


AOP04.1

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011

100% Completed

LKPR ‐ Praha Airport

Czech Republic has implemented the Objective. ANS CR was member of BETA research project (2000‐2002) which evaluated operational impact of A‐SMGCS. System NOVA 9000 (produced by Park Air Systems) is installed in Prague Ruzyne airport.

‐

REG (By:12/2010)

CAA CR All actions are completed. ‐ 100% Completed

‐


‐

ASP (By:12/2011)

ASP ANS CR All actions are completed. ‐ 100% Completed

‐

APO (By:12/2010)

Prague Airport

All actions are completed. ‐ 100% Completed

‐

AOP04.2

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed


Czech Republic has implemented the Objective. The implementation and operation is the responsibility of the ASP and thus the Objective is not applicable for APO.

‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

ASP ANS CR A‐SMGCS Level 2 functionality was installed in Prague/Ruzyne airport and is in full operation.

‐ 100% Completed

‐

APO (By:12/2017)

Prague Airport

Not required (A‐SMGCS control function installed and operated by ASP).

‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


AOP05

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed


Airport CDM at Praha/Ruzyne launched October 2009; TOBT is provided by GHA. TSAT procedure, DEP sequencing and CDM De‐icing procedures launched in September 2011. FUM/DPI implemented in 2015.

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2016)

ASP ANS CR ‐ Airport CDM 100% Completed

31/12/2013

APO (By:12/2016)

Prague Airport

Airport CDM at Praha/Ruzyne launched 6 Oct. 2009; TOBT is provided by GHA. TSAT procedure, DEP sequencing and CDM De‐icing procedures implemented in September 2011. FUM/DPI implemented in September 2015.

Airport CDM 100%

Completed

31/12/2015

ASP ANS CR

Airport CDM at Praha/Ruzyne launched 6 Oct. 2009; TOBT is provided by GHA. TSAT procedure, DEP sequencing and CDM De‐icing procedures implemented in September 2011. FUM/DPI implemented in September 2015.

Airport CDM 100%

Completed

31/12/2015

AOP10 Time‐Based Separation Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


Prague Ruzyne Airport (LKPR) is not in the applicability area. ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

ASP (By:12/2023)

AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

9% Ongoing


Gap analysis in progress in relation to CDM procedures. 31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2021)

ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2019

APO (By:12/2021)

Prague Airport

‐ ‐ 12% Ongoing

31/12/2019


AOP12

Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

35% Ongoing


ANS CR project "Advanced Safety Nets for Prague Airport" is scheduled for years 2016 ‐ 2018; CBA for the project was finished beginning of 2016.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2020)

ASP ANS CR ANS CR project "Advanced Safety Nets for Prague Airport" is scheduled for years 2016‐ 2018; CBA for the project was finished beginning of 2016.

‐ 47% Ongoing

31/12/2018

APO (By:12/2020)

Prague Airport

‐ ‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2018

AOP13

Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


CZ (LKPR) is not in the applicability area. ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

ASP (By:12/2023)

ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

ATC02.8

Ground‐Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

63% Late

‐

The APW and MSAW functions are fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018. There is currently no plan for APM implementation.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2016)

ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 60% Late

31/12/2018


31/12/2015


ATC02.9

Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

95% Ongoing

‐

The STCA functions are fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2020)

ASP ANS CR

The STCA functions are fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018.

‐ 95%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

ATC07.1

AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019

0% Late


There was an intention to implement AMAN based on the result of feasibility study and CBA for Prague Ruzyne AMAN/DMAN. The project is currently planned for the implementation in time span 2019 ‐ 2022 based on LKPR traffic evolution.

31/12/2022

ASP (By:12/2019)

ASP ANS CR

There was an intention to implement AMAN based on the result of feasibility study and CBA for Prague Ruzyne AMAN/DMAN. Currently the project is planned for the implementation in time span 2019 ‐ 2022 based on LKPR traffic evolution.

AMAN LOWW initial

0%

Late

31/12/2022

ATC12.1

Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

26% Ongoing

‐

Specification is part of a new ANS CR ATM System (Neopteryx) project. Full implementation is planned for 2021.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ASP ANS CR Specification is part of Neopteryx project. Full implementation is planned for 2021.

‐ 26% Ongoing

31/12/2021


ATC15.1

Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

63% Late

‐

Basic algorithm of production of AMA message is implemented in our en‐route system. Operational use depends on implementation of AMAN system in Munich, Vienna and other airports.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2017)

ASP ANS CR

Basic algorithm of production of AMA message is implemented in our en‐route system. Operational use depends on implementation of AMAN system in Munich, Vienna and other airports.

AMAN LOWW initial

63%

Late

31/12/2018

ATC15.2

Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

0% No Plan

‐

There is currently no approved plan. ‐

ASP (By:12/2023)

ASP ANS CR There is currently no approved plan. ‐ 0% No Plan

‐

ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

48% Late

‐

The implementation is ongoing; COF and MAS messages are in operational use. TIM and ROF messages are installed but not in operational use yet. The implementation of missing messages is planned before 12/2019.

31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2018)


31/12/2019

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

33% Late

‐

ANS CR implemented the capability of AMHS in January, 2018. Intention of MoD is to follow ASP but implementation depends on available budget.

31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2018)

CDPD Intention of MoD is to follow ASP but implementation depends on available budget.

‐ 0% Late

31/12/2019

ASP ANS CR ANS CR implemented the capability of AMHS in January, 2018.

AMHS 100% Completed

04/01/2018

CZ Air Force Intention of MoD is to follow ASP but implementation depends on available budget.

‐ 0% Late

31/12/2019


COM11

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

68% Ongoing

‐

Implementation planned for 2020 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

ASP ANS CR Implemented on regional airports. Implementation in APP/TWR Prague and ACC Prague planned for 12/2020.

VoIP 32% Ongoing

31/12/2020

CDPD For the military, planned for 12/2020. VoIP 87% Ongoing

31/12/2020

CZ Air Force For the military, planned for 12/2020. VoIP 87% Ongoing

31/12/2020

COM12

New Pan‐European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020

0% Planned

‐

ASP plans to join NewPENS. APO communication with NM ensured via ASP. 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2024)

ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2020

APO (By:12/2024)

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


CDO test flights were performed in 2011 and assessed in 2012. The test results proved no significant benefits. Based on results of the tests ASP decided not to publish specific CDO procedures yet. CDO is provided by "distance‐to‐go" information to A/C.

‐

ASP (By:12/2013)

ASP ANS CR

CDO test flights were performed in 2011 and assessed in 2012. The test results proved no significant benefits. Based on these results ASP decided not to publish specific CDO procedures yet. CDO is provided by "distance‐to‐go" information to A/C.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2013)

Prague Airport

Implementation depends on ASP plans. ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


ENV02

Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed


CEM was officially launched in June 2010. Meetings are organized twice a year and on demand. Agreements on the care for the ennvironment and environmental impacts if the APO operations were signed with subjects concerned.

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2016)

ASP ANS CR

CEM was officially launched in June 2010. Meetings are organized twice a year and on demand. Environmental implications of aircraft operations are part of ATCO training.

‐ 100%

Completed

30/06/2010

APO (By:12/2016)

Prague Airport

CEM was officially launched in June 2010. With regard to communication with concerned subjects, agreements on the care for the ennvironment and environmental impacts if the APO operations were signed.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2012

FCM03

Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

84% Late

‐

AFP messages were technically implemented, but not in operational use yet. Operational internal tests are planned for 2018, further tests with NM will follow. Full implementation is expected in 2018.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2017)

ASP ANS CR

AFP messages were technically implemented, but not in operational use yet. Operational internal tests are planned for 2018, further tests with NM will follow. Full implementation is expected in 2018.

‐ 84%

Late

31/12/2018

FCM04.1

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/10/2017

100% Completed

‐


‐

ASP (By:10/2017)

ASP ANS CR



STAM

100%

Completed

‐


FCM04.2

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

5% Ongoing

‐

Initial actions have started as part of FAB CE DAM/STAM Project (ex. P3). It is likely that STAM phase 2 will be implemented with the availability of this function in the N‐connect Tool, planned for implementation end of 2018. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2021)

ASP ANS CR ‐



STAM

5%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

FCM05

Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

3% Ongoing

‐

Project objectives will be accomplished by developing a national ASM tool. The national ASM tool will also be interconnected to the military ASM tool and interoperable with NM. For the military, the decision has not been taken yet, however the MIL will closely cooperate with civil side. MIL is considered as low key stakeholder. AT FAB CE level implementation of interactive rolling NOP is planned through upgrade of the automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM and Perform an integration of the automated ASM support systems with the Network. All these projects will be fulfilled in accordance with the NM support, the guidance and the relevant provisions of the NM B2B Reference Manuals. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ASP ANS CR ‐



STAM

0%

Planned

31/12/2021

APO (By:12/2021)

Prague Airport

‐ ‐ 5% Ongoing

31/12/2021


FCM06

Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

30% Ongoing

‐

The objective is to provide support in the management of the traffic load over LKAA area. Support should be primarily provided to Prague ACC Flow Manager position. Secondary service would be provided to Prague ACC/APP control sectors. Planned for 2018. At FAB CE level several options are discussed on whether ANSP will procure a ready‐made Complexity Assessment Tool, or will commit to develop such a tool using own resources. One solution is being discussed on the possibility to have a common FAB CE Complexity Tool, more details will be available end 02/2017. Initial actions have been made, with advanced use of CHMI functions (Associated Flows etc). Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2021)

ASP ANS CR

The objective is to provide support in the management of the traffic load over LKAA area. Support should be primarily provided to Prague ACC Flow Manager position. Secondary service would be provided to Prague ACC/APP control sectors.



STAM

30%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

FCM08

Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% No Plan

‐

Currently there is no plan for the implementation. ‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

ASP ANS CR Currently there is no plan for the implementation. ‐ 0% No Plan

‐


INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018

65% Late

‐

Planned for 12/2018. 31/12/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

MoT CR The national policy on TOD is covered by relevant provisions of the Aviation Act No 49/1997 Coll. and by associated Ministerial Decree No 108/1997 Coll.

‐ 100% Completed

‐

CAA CR

The current NSA processes will be used to verify implementation of the requirements at ANS providers and other stakeholders. The regulatory compliance shall be conducted in compliance with national TOD policy and Implementation programme.

‐ 5%

Late

31/12/2018

ASP (By:05/2018)

ASP ANS CR

ETOD is maintained by AIS ANS CR. Terrain data supplied by MIL are in conformity with requirements of ICAO Annex 15. Data supplied by airports operators do not fulfill all requirements of the Annex.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

APO (By:05/2018)

Prague Airport

Planned for ‐ 55% Late

31/12/2018

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft Identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020

100% Completed

‐

The objective has been achieved by implementation of Mode S capability. 31/12/2012

ASP (By:01/2020)

ASP ANS CR All actions completed. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

22% Late

‐

The working group at national level was established and all required actions including time schedule are in preparation. Part of the requirements are fulfilled as a part of the standard NSA oversight process with regard to ICAO and SES legislation requirements. The objective will be completed when ANS CR provides new AIM system planned for 2018. MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.

31/12/2018

REG (By:06/2017)

CAA CR The working group at national level was established and all required actions including time schedule are in preparation.

‐ 53% Late

31/12/2018

MAA

The working group at national level was established. MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.

‐ 10%

Late

31/12/2018

CDPD

MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.

‐ 10%

Late

31/12/2018

ASP (By:06/2017)

ASP ANS CR

The working group at national level was established. Part of required actions are implemented; see details below. The objective will be completed when ANS CR provides new AIM system planned for 2018.

‐ 41%

Late

31/12/2018

CZ Air Force

The working group at national level was established. MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.

‐ 10%

Late

31/12/2018

CDPD

MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.

‐ 10%

Late

31/12/2018

APO (By:06/2017)

Prague Airport

The working group at national level was established and all required actions including time schedule are in preparation. APO is in proces of SW procurement to meet the requirements.

‐ 13%

Late

31/12/2018


ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

100% Completed

‐

ANS CR implemented A/G data link services on February 6, 2017. MIL has completed for state transport aircraft able to fly at or above FL 285 in compliance with EU regulation.

06/02/2017

REG (By:02/2018)

CAA CR CAA CR acts accordingly based upon the ASPs implementation plans in line with established procedures.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2016


31/12/2016

ASP (By:02/2018)

ASP ANS CR ANS CR implemented A/G data link services on February 6, 2017.

‐ 100% Completed

06/02/2017

MIL (By:01/2019)

CDPD Completed for state transport aircraft able to fly at or above FL 285 in compliance with EU regulation.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014


ITY‐AGVCS2

8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

100% Completed

‐

NSA has enforced the requirements for voice channels spacing for new introduced radios since 2013. The safety oversight of changes in ATM will be performed as a standard procedure in terms defined by AIC C 02/13 with regard to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012. According to AIC A 8/15, the conversion of Frequency Plan was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).

31/12/2017

REG (By:12/2018)

MoT CR According to AIC 8/15, the conversion of Frequency Plan was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).

‐ 100% Completed

‐

CDPD ‐ ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2017


31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2018)

CZ Air Force According to AIC 8/15, the conversion of the frequency was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2017

CDPD According to AIC 8/15, the conversion of Frequency Plan was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2017

MAA According to AIC 8/15, the conversion of the frequency was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2017

ASP ANS CR

According to AIC A 8/15, the conversion of Frequency Plan was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017). ASP followed the Transition plan developed by MoT. RCOM system was upgraded in 2017.

Conversion to the 8.33 kHz channel spacing

below FL195

100%

Completed

31/12/2017

MIL (By:12/2020)

CZ Air Force MIL follows the national plan established by MoT with agreement of MoD.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2017

CDPD MIL follows the national plan established by MoT with agreement of MoD.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2017


APO (By:12/2018)


31/12/2017

ASP ANS CR ‐


below FL195

100%

Completed

31/12/2017

Prague Airport

‐


below FL195

%

Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐FMTP

Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

100% Completed

‐

FMTP has already been implemented and is already operationally used internally (ANS CR, MIL, regional airports) and externally with exception of PL.

31/12/2014

ASP (By:12/2014)

ASP ANS CR

For ANS CR, all actions are completed. FMTP implemented with neighbours except PL. IPv4 protocol is used internally. There is a translation device for conversion from IPv4 to IPv6 on communication interface with neighbouring states.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

CDPD

For MIL all actions are completed. IPv4 protocol is used internally. There is a translation device for conversion from IPv4 to IPv6 on communication interface with ANS CR.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

CZ Air Force

For MIL all actions are completed. IPv4 protocol is used internally. There is a translation device for conversion from IPv4 to IPv6 on communication interface with ANS CR.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

MIL (By:12/2014)

CZ Air Force Completed ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

CDPD Completed ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014


ITY‐SPI

Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

71% Ongoing

‐

ASP and REG completed. MIL ongoing. 07/06/2020

REG (By:02/2015)

CAA CR The oversight of this objective's implementation falls into the CAA CR Annual Safety and Regulatory Oversight Programme.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2013

ASP (By:02/2015)


31/12/2013

MIL (By:06/2020)

CDPD The most of MIL transport aircraft have been equipped by EHS and ADS‐B out. Training partly completed.

‐ 23% Ongoing

07/06/2020

CZ Air Force The most of MIL transport aircraft have been equipped by EHS and ADS‐B out. Training partly completed.

‐ 23% Ongoing

07/06/2020

NAV03.1

RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

100% Completed

‐

RNAV1 procedures are implemented in TMA Prague. 31/12/2010

ASP (By:12/2023)

ASP ANS CR RNAV1 procedures were implemented in TMA Prague (in 2010).

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2010

CAA CR

The Czech Republic started implementation of PBN very soon and PBN procedures (RNAV‐1 SID,STAR, RNP APCH) are published at almost all Czech IFR airports. For the period 2016+ there is a plan for just marginal improvements of these procedures.The implementation Road Map of the PBN procedures was described within PBN questionnaire document addressed to the Network Manager.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2010

NAV03.2

RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

0% No Plan

‐

There is currently no plan for the implementation. ‐

ASP (By:12/2023)

ASP ANS CR There is currently no plan for the implementation. ‐ 0% No Plan

‐


NAV10

APV Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed

‐

APV/Baro procedures have been implemented for Praha Ruzyne and published in AIP in 2010. APV SBAS was implemented for regional airports (LKTB, LKMT, LKKV) in 2014.

31/12/2014

REG (By:04/2016)

CAA CR Material published on CAA website. ‐ 100% Completed

30/04/2011

ASP (By:12/2016)

ASP ANS CR

APV/Baro procedures have been implemented for Praha Ruzyne and publised in AIP in 2010. APV SBAS was implemented for regional airports (LKTB, LKMT, LKKV) in 2014.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

SAF11

Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018

18% Late

‐

Implementation of SAF 11 is planned. Runway Safety Team was established during implementation of Runway Incursion Programme so general requirements (Part 3.1) are already implemented. Runway Safety Programme for the Czech Republic was published on 27.10.2016 in AIC 25/16.

31/12/2020

REG (By:01/2018)

CAA CR Documentation for the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions was published in 2016. Subsequent steps will follow.

‐ 25% Late

31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2014)

MAA

Appropriate military airports concerned need to be defined at national level, in accordance with EAPPRE. Only one MIL airport (Pardubice) has been considered for implementing the Objective; MoD uses own system on other airports.

‐ 0%

Late

31/12/2018


31/12/2018

CZ Air Force


‐ 0%

Late

31/12/2018

APO (By:12/2014)

Prague Airport

‐ ‐ 100% Completed

‐

CZ Air Force


‐ 0%

Late

31/12/2018

MAA


‐ 0%

Late

31/12/2018


Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013

68% Late

‐

STCA function is fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018. The system is implemented also by MIL and upgrade to OAT traffic specifications and validation was done in 2012.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:01/2013)

CZ Air Force

Military system is also equipped with the STCA functionality which was successfully tested. An upgrade regarding to MIL traffic specification (OAT) and validation was done.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2012

ASP ANS CR STCA function is fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018.

‐ 55% Late

31/12/2018

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

100% Completed

‐

ASP has completed in 03/2012. MIL completed for VIP transport a/c only (type Airbus 319‐115).

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

CAA CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)


31/03/2012

MIL (By:12/2015)

CZ Air Force MIL completed for VIP transport a/c only (type Airbus 319‐115).

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

CDPD MIL completed for VIP transport a/c only (type Airbus 319‐115).

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015


FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006

100% Completed

‐

The implementation is completed. Some SLoAs are considered as not applicable. Military system receives and processes ATFM data via ANS CR.

31/12/2014

ASP (By:07/2014)

MIL ASP Military system receives and processes ATFM data via ANS CR.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

ASP ANS CR

ANS CR has already implemented processing of CPR and FSA messages for ATFM purposes. Processing of FSA in case of rerouting inside FDPA and in case of aircraft holding is considered as not applicable in terms of cost/benefit ratio. Processing of DPI is part of A‐CDM Project.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

INF04

Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

IBS system was implemented at ARO in 12/2010. This system fulfiles Level 5 requirements for integrated briefing.

31/12/2010

ASP (By:12/2012)

CZ Air Force For the military, the objective has been implemented in 12/2008.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2010

ASP ANS CR IBS system was implemented at ARO in 12/2010. This system fulfiles Level 5 requirements for integrated briefing.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2010

ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

All mandatory requirements of IR COTR are implemented. 31/12/2014

ASP (By:12/2012)

ASP ANS CR

All mandatory requirements of IR COTR are implemented. Implementation of "Logon Forward " (ASP08) and "Next Authority Notified" (ASP09) processes is planned in frame of A/G Datalink implementation with the implementation date in 2017.

‐ 100%

Completed

‐

MIL (By:12/2012)

CDPD ‐ ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

CZ Air Force Completed ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014


Local Objectives

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local

% No Plan

LKPR ‐ PRAHA/RUZYNE

There is currently no plan to implement Remote Tower Services in Czech Republic. ‐

ATC18 Multi‐Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local

% No Plan

‐

There is currently no plan for the implementation. ‐

ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local

% No Plan

LKPR ‐ PRAHA/RUZYNE

There is no plan at the moment for application of CCO due to high traffic complexity. Future implementation of CCO is intended, but the target date has not been set.

‐

NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Applicability and timescale: Local

% No Plan

‐

There is currently no plan for implementation. ‐

Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.


ANNEXES

ANNEX A ‐ Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co‐ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP National Focal Point for Czech Republic

ANS CR Tomáš TRŽICKÝ

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA CAA Jaroslav PEKÁREK

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP ANS CR Martin LINDNER

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Prague Airport Miroslav ŠPÁK

LSSIP Focal Point for Military MoD Miloslav BENEŠ

LSSIP Focal Point for MoT MoT Zdeněk JELÍNEK

LSSIP Focal Point for AAII AAII Stanislav SUCHÝ

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person for Czech Republic

DPS/PEPR Agnieszka DYBOWSKA


Implementation Objectives

Implementation Objective

EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners

National Stakeholder Specialist

AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)

AOM19.1 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /

O. MROWICKI

Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)


O. MROWICKI



O. MROWICKI

AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Václav VORÁČEK (ANS CR)

AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Václav VORÁČEK (ANS CR)

AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Jan KUBÍČEK (ANS CR)

AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Jan KUBÍČEK (ANS CR)

AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE (PRAGUE AIRPORT)

AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM Petr KUNC (ANS CR)

AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE (PRAGUE AIRPORT)

AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Jan KUBÍČEK (ANS CR)

AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM

AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE

ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)

ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)

ATC07.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)



ATC15.2 L. DELL’ORTO P. HOP

ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO S. MORTON Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)

ATC18 L. DELL’ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI Tomáš NAVRÁTIL (ANS CR)

COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU Ivo PŘÍPLATA (ANS CR)

COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU Milan DVOŘÁK (ANS CR)

COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS Martin JELÍNEK (ANS CR)

ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN Petr KUNC (ANS CR)

ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY (PRAGUE AIRPORT)

ENV03 A‐P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN

FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI

Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)

FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)

FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)

FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI


FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)


FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI

INF07 A‐P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY Jiří LATIOK (ANS CR)

ITY‐ACID O. CIOARA pending Ivan UHLÍŘ (ANS CR)

ITY‐ADQ A‐P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER Radek HODAČ (ANS CR)

ITY‐AGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC Milan KORÁB (ANS CR)

ATY‐AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET Martin LEHKÝ (ANS CR)

ITY‐FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)

ITY‐SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY Ivan UHLÍŘ (ANS CR)

NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Tomáš DUKA (ANS CR)

NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Tomáš DUKA (ANS CR)

NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH Tomáš DUKA (ANS CR)

NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET

SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending (CAA)


ANNEX B ‐ National Stakeholders Organisation charts

CZECH REPUBLIC AVIATION ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE

The overall organisational structure of the aviation regulation in the Czech Republic is represented in the following

Figure: Organisational structure of the Czech Republic Aviation Regulation

Ministry of Defence

GOVERNMENT

Ministry of Transport (Civil Aviation Department)

Air Accidents Investigation Institute

Civil Aviation Authority


of the Czech Republic

Prague Airport

Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection

Division of MoD

Institute of Aviation Medicine

Other Airport Operators

Other ATC Providers

Civil Aircraft Operators

Czech Air Force

Air Force Development of the Capability Development and Planning Division ‐ MoD


CAA CR ESTABLISHMENT

The Civil Aviation Authority of the Czech Republic was established by the Czech Civil Aviation Act as a

government agency in charge of civil aviation. It is subordinate to the Ministry of Transport. See also current

detailed organisational structure at: http://www.caa.cz/authority/organisational‐structure‐1

Spokesperson Management System Manager

Security Director Quality Auditor

Internal Quality Control Safety Inspector

Secretary of the CAA Director

Informatics Section

Economic Section

Payroll Accountant

Logistics Department

Flight Operations Security Section

Air Cargo Security Section

Security Department

AdministrativeFunctioning Section

Legal Section

Legal Department

Internal Servicesand Security Division Director

Secretary

Inspector Pilot Section

Flight Operations InspectionSection

Specialised Operations Section

Non-commercial OperationsSection

Ramp Inspections Section

Aircraft OperationsDepartment

Training OrganisationSupervising Section

Aicraft Register

Personnel ExaminationSection

Practical Skill and MedicalSection

Personnel LicensingDepartment

Parachuting Section

Flight Division Director

Secretary

Product CertificationSection

Aircraft Design Section

ProductionSection

Aircraft Certification andEngineering Department

Transport AircraftSection

Maintenance Section

Small Aircraft Section

Aircraft ContinuousAirworthiness Department

Technical Division Director

Secretary

Regulation Section

Unmanned AerialSystem Section

External Relations andSpecial Activities Department

Aerodromes Section

Unmanned AerialSystem Section

External Relations andSpecial Activities Department

Interoperability Section

Supervision Section

Development Manager

FAB Coordinator

Air Navigation ServicesDepartment

Operators Section

Aeronautical OperationsDivision Director

Director of the CAA


AIR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION INSTITUTE (AAII)

The overall organisational chart of the AAII is shown in Figure below:

Figure: Organisational chart of the AAII

Note: With regard to a new systematization by 1. 1. 2017.


Prague Airport Organisational Chart


SIMPLIFIED ORGANISATIONAL CHART OF THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT

Minister of Transport

Transport Section

Civil Aviation Department

Air Operation, Technology and

Development Division

Air Transport Division

Aerodromes Infrastructure Division


SIMPLIFIED ORGANISATIONAL CHART OF ANS CR (as of January 1, 2018)

Director General

Safety Unit

Operations Unit

CNS/ATM Systems Operation Division

ATM Division

ATM Training and Business Unit

Flight Inspection Section

Business and Marketing Section

ATM Training Section

Finance and Administration Unit

Central Logistics Section

Audit and Investigation

Finance Section

Human Resources Section

Office of the Director General

Strategy and Management Support

ANS Planning and Development Division

Area Control Navigation

Services Section

Approach and Aerodrome

Control Services

Regional Airport Air Navigation Services Section

Aeronautical Telecommunications

Services Centre

Radar and Information Systems Centre

NAVCOM Centre


Methodology

Project and Investments

Implementation

AIM Section


ANNEX C – Implementation Objectives’ Applicability

Objective SESAR

Key Feature

ICAO ASBU

B0 European ATM Masterplan Level 3 Applicability area

AOM13.1

‐ All ECAC States except Albania, Latvia, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and

Moldova.

AOM19.1

B0‐FRTO All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Malta, Luxembourg, and

Moldova

AOM19.2

‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova

AOM19.3

‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova

AOM21.1

B0‐FRTO 25 ECAC States

AOM21.2

‐ All ECAC States except Azerbaijan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the

Netherlands

AOP04.1

B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports

AOP04.2

B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports

AOP05

B0‐ACDM 25 PCP airports, 21 non‐PCP airports

AOP10

‐ 16 PCP Airports

AOP11

‐ 24 PCP airports, 15 non‐PCP airports

AOP12

‐ 25 PCP airports

AOP13

‐ 25 PCP airports

AOP14

‐ Local: Low to medium complexity aerodromes, subject to local needs

ATC02.2 B0‐SNET Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all ECAC States that did

not yet implement it

ATC02.8

B0‐SNET All ECAC States except the Netherlands

ATC02.9

B0‐SNET TMAs, according to local business needs

ATC07.1

B0‐RSEQ 23 PCP Airports, 8 non‐PCP airports

ATC12.1

‐ All ECAC States except Luxembourg

ATC15.1

B0‐RSEQ

EU States except Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovak

Republic, Slovenia. Plus: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maastricht UAC,

Norway, Switzerland, Turkey

ATC15.2

‐ ACCs within the extended AMAN horizon, including those adjacent to

TMAs serving/associated to PCP airports

ATC16 B0‐ACAS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that

did not yet implement it

ATC17

B0‐FICE All ECAC States except Ireland, Slovak Republic and Ukraine

ATC18

‐ Local: Subject to local needs and complexity

COM10

‐ All ECAC States

COM11

‐ All ECAC States


COM12

‐

‐ Area 1 (ANSPs signatories of the NewPENS Common Procurement

Agreement): 33 ANSPs

‐ Area 2 (Other stakeholders): Stakeholders from all ECAC States not part

of Area 1

ENV01

B0‐CDO 59 Airports

ENV02

‐ 47 Airports

ENV03

B0‐CCO Local: Aerodromes subject to local needs and complexity

FCM01 B0‐NOPS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that


FCM03

B0‐NOPS All ECAC States

FCM04.1

B0‐NOPS Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland,

Spain, Switzerland

FCM04.2

B0‐NOPS All EU+ States

FCM05

B0‐NOPS All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC

and Moldova

FCM06

B0‐NOPS All EU+ States

FCM07

‐ All EU+ States

FCM08

‐ All ECAC States

FCM09

‐ All ECAC States

INF04 B0‐DATM Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that


INF07

‐ All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC

INF08.1

‐ All EU+ States

INF08.2

‐ All EU+ States

ITY‐ACID

‐ All EU+ States

ITY‐ADQ

B0‐DATM All EU+ States except FYROM, Georgia and Maastricht UAC

ITY‐AGDL

B0‐TBO All EU+ States except Georgia, Luxembourg and Netherlands

ITY‐AGVCS2

‐ All EU+ States except Georgia and Moldova

ITY‐COTR B0‐FICE Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all EU+ States that did

not yet implement it

ITY‐FMTP

B0‐FICE All ECAC States

ITY‐SPI

B0‐ASUR All EU+ States

NAV03.1

B0‐CDO,

B0‐CCO All ECAC States except Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Slovak Republic

NAV03.2

‐ Mandatory for TMAs listed in section 1.2.1 of the Annex of the PCP

Regulation. For all other ECAC TMAs, according to local business needs

NAV10

B0‐APTA All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC

NAV12

‐ Local: TMAs subject to local needs and complexity

SAF11

‐ All ECAC States except Malta


Legend:

Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:


High Performing Airport Operations

Advanced Air Traffic Services



ANNEX D ‐ Glossary of Abbreviations

This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Czech Republic.

Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

Term Description

AAII Air Accidents Investigation Institute

AF ATM Functionality

AHA Active Hazard Assessment

Airport CDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making

ANS CR Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic

A‐SMGCS Advanced Surface Movement Guidance & Control System

CAA Civil Aviation Authority

CAD Civil Aviation Department (MoT)

CHMI Czech Hydrometeorological Institute

CDPD The Air Force Development of the Capability Development and Planning Division MoD

CTR Control Area

DFL Division Flight Level

FT Fast Track

IATCC Integrated Air Traffic Control Centre

MAA Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection Division of MoD

MCTR Military CTR

MoD Ministry of Defence

MoT Ministry of Transport

MTMA Military TMA

NOP Network Operation Plan

NSA National Supervisory Authority

PCP Pilot Common Project

PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme

RET Rapid Exit Taxiway

SRA Security Restricted Area

S‐AF Sub ATM Functionality

TWR Tower

UIR Upper Flight Information Region

Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - CZECH REPUBLIC · LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic...

Documents

Transcript of Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - CZECH REPUBLIC · LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic...