Level 1 - Implementation Overview
Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - CZECH REPUBLIC
EUROCONTROL
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic Released Issue
Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Czech Republic
Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/13
Date of Edition 22/05/2018
LSSIP Focal Point T. TRŽICKÝ ‐ [email protected]
LSSIP Contact Person A. DYBOWSKA ‐ [email protected]
Status Released
Intended for Agency Stakeholders
Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
Reference Documents
LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2017
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐plan
Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2016
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐report
European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/
STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor
Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
National AIP http://lis.rlp.cz/ais_data/www_main_control/frm_en_aip.htm
FAB Performance Plan Latest FAB CE Performance Plan V2.0 For details contact: Mr Matej Eljon matej.eljon@fab‐ce.eu
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic Released Issue
CONTENTS
1. National ATM Environment ............................................................. 5 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................5 1.1. National Stakeholders .........................................................................................7 1.2.
2. Traffic and Capacity ....................................................................... 16 Evolution of traffic in Czech Republic .............................................................. 16 2.1. ACC Prague ....................................................................................................... 17 2.2.
3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 21
4. Implementation Projects ............................................................... 22 National projects .............................................................................................. 22 4.1. FAB projects ..................................................................................................... 23 4.2. Regional projects .............................................................................................. 25 4.3.
5. Cooperation activities .................................................................... 26 FAB Co‐ordination ............................................................................................ 26 5.1. Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 27 5.2.
6. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................. 30 State View......................................................................................................... 30 6.1. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 36 6.2.
Annexes
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 1 Released Issue
Executive Summary
National ATM Context
Civil Aviation in the Czech Republic is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport (MoT).
The National Supervisory Authority (hereinafter referred to as the NSA), is, as per SES Service Provision Regulation, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). The CAA is institutionally separated from the ANSP.
The Military Authorities in the Czech Republic are the Military Aviation Authority of MoD (MAA), the Air Force Development Department of the Capability Development and Planning Division (CDPD) and the Czech Air Force Headquarters. The Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection Division (MAA) is the main regulator for military aviation.
Technical investigations following accidents or serious incidents are carried out by Air Accident Investigation Institute (AAII) which performs its functions independently in compliance with European legislation and reports only to the Government of the Czech Republic. In case of civil‐military accidents / incidents both, civil and military accident / incident investigation authorities have to cooperate. The MoD has its own occurrence reporting and data sharing system.
Traffic and Capacity
Traffic in the FIR Praha increased by 1.8 % during summer 2016 (May to October inclusive) when compared to the same period during 2016. The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year Forecast predicts (for 2017 – 2021) an average annual growth between 0.8% and 4.8%, with a baseline growth of 2.7%.
The average en‐route delay per flight increased from 0.01 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.07 minutes per flight in the Summer 2017.
The capacity gap may be expected in Prague ACC if traffic continues to fly on currents routes during the planning period. In 2019 the preparation for airspace reorganisation (expected in 2019/20) and the new system (expected in 2020/21) will start, and the capacity gap may occur in 2019.
The major international airport of the Czech Republic is Praha/Ruzyně Airport operated by Prague Airport, (Letiště Praha, a. s.) a joint stock company.
Progress per SESAR Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase.
Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 2 Released Issue
The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011‐2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.
Pre‐SESAR Implementation
2010 2019
73%
PCP Implementation
2015 2023
18%
Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.
ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6.1.3.
Block 0 2010 2018
74%
n/a
66%
7%
Pre‐SESAR
64%
29%
88%
79%
14%
Pre‐SESAR
Pre‐SESAR
Pre‐SESAR
PCP
PCP
PCP
PCP
Optimised ATM Network Services
Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing
Airport Operations
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 3 Released Issue
ATM Deployment Outlook
State objectives
Deployed in 2016‐2017: ‐ Data Link [ITY‐AGDL] 100% progress ‐ 8,33 kHz below FL195 [ITY‐AGVCS2] 100% progress
‐ Enhanced STCA for TMAs [ATC02.9] 95% progress ‐ Collaborative Flight Planning [FCM03] 84% progress ‐ STCA En‐Route [ATC02.2] 68% progress ‐ eTOD [INF07] 65% progress ‐ AMAN to en‐route [ATC15.1] 63% progress ‐ Ground‐Based Safety Nets [ATC02.8] 63% progress ‐ Traffic Complexity [FCM06] 30% progress ‐ Aeronautical Information [ITY‐ADQ] 22% progress ‐ STAM Phase 2 [FCM04.2] 5% progress
‐ Coordination and transfer [ATC17] 48% progress ‐ AMHS [COM10] 33% progress
‐ Surveillance Performance & Interoperability [ITY‐SPI] 71% progress ‐ Voice over IP [COM11] 68% progress ‐ Runway excursions [SAF11] 18% progress ‐ NewPENS [COM12] 0% progress
‐ MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 26% progress ‐ Free Route Airspace [AOM21.2] 15% progress ‐ ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 10% progress ‐ Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 3% progress ‐ Real‐Time Airspace Data [AOM19.2] 0% progress
Airport objectives – LKPR ‐ Praha Airport
‐ AMAN [ATC07.1] 0% progress
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 4 Released Issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years.
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players ‐ civil and military ‐ and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;
Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;
Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;
Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;
Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high‐level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017. In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.
The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 5 Released Issue
1. National ATM Environment
Geographical Scope 1.1.
International Membership
Czech Republic is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since
ECAC 1993 (1991*)
EUROCONTROL 1996
European Union 2004
EASA 2004
ICAO 1993 (1944*)
NATO 1999
ITU 1993 (1918*)
* as Czechoslovakia
Geographical description of the FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses the Czech Republic FIR Praha. The Czech Republic FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States, namely Germany UIR Rhein and FIR München; Poland with FIR Warszawa, Slovak Republic with FIR Bratislava and Austria with FIR Wien (see Figure 1).
Vertical limits of FIR Praha are ground level and FL 660.
The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL 245.
The controlled airspace of FIR Praha comprises:
• 4 Control Areas (CTA), CTA Praha from 1000ft AGL to FL660, CTA Karlovy Vary, CTA Brno, CTA Ostrava, from 1000ft AGL to FL125, with the exception of TMA / CTR and MTMA / MCTR;
• TMAs / CTRs;
• MTMAs / MCTRs
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 6 Released Issue
Figure 1: Praha FIR and neighbouring FIR’s
Airspace Classification and Organisation
The Czech Republic is following the ICAO classification. The Figure below shows the classification of Airspace of the FIR Praha and CTA Praha. The Czech Republic has implemented ICAO Class C above FL095 to FL660. See Figure 2.
Figure 2: FIR Praha airspace classification
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 7 Released Issue
National Stakeholders 1.2.
The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Czech Republic are the following:
‐ The Ministry of Transport (MoT) and the Civil Aviation Department (CAD) of the Ministry of Transport;
‐ The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) which acts as a National Supervisory Authority (NSA);
‐ The Air Accidents Investigation Institute (AAII);
‐ The Institute of Aviation Medicine, Ústav leteckého zdravotnictví (ÚLZ) is an independent State Agency;
‐ The Ministry of Defence (MoD);
The Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection Division (MAA);
The Air Force Development Department of the Capability Development and Planning Division (CDPD);
‐ The Czech Air Force;
‐ The Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic (ANS CR) is the main ANS provider;
‐ The Prague Airport, Joint Stock Company is the operator of the major airport Praha‐Ruzyně.
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the chart below.
Ministry of Defence
GOVERNMENT
Ministry of Transport (Civil Aviation Department)
Air Accidents Investigation Institute
Civil Aviation Authority
Air Navigation Services
of the Czech Republic
Prague Airport
Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection
Division of MoD
Institute of Aviation Medicine
Other Airport Operators
Other ATC Providers
Civil Aircraft Operators
Czech Air Force
Air Force Development of the Capability Development and Planning Division ‐ MoD
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 8 Released Issue
Civil Regulator(s)
General Information
Civil Aviation in the Czech Republic is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport (MoT).
An organisational chart of the Czech Republic Aviation structure, the CAA, the AAII, the ANS CR and Prague Airport is in Annex B.
The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.
Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis
Rule‐making Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.
Safety Oversight NSA (CAA) Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.
Enforcement actions in case of non‐compliance with safety regulatory requirements
NSA (CAA) Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.
Airspace NSA (CAA) and MoD
(close cooperation with approval of both organisations)
Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.
Economic Ministry of Transport (MoT) acts as an Economic Regulator in the field of unit rates.
Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.
Environment Ministry of Health / Regional Hygienic Stations
Ministry of Environment
Act No. 2/1969 Coll.
Act No. 258/ 2000 Coll.
Act No. 173/1989 Coll.
Security CAA/Ministry of Transport (MoT)
(CAA fully acts as a responsible authority according to EU Reg. 300/2008; MoT acts as a policy maker and holds chairmanships in Intragovernmental Commission for Aviation Security)
Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.
Accident investigation Air Accidents Investigation Institute (AAII)
Civil Aviation Act no. 49/1997 Coll.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 9 Released Issue
CAA
The National Supervisory Authority (NSA), as per SES Service Provision Regulation, is the CAA. The CAA is institutionally separated from the ANSP and has been nominated by the Czech Aviation Act No. 49/1997 Coll. as the National Supervisory Authority (NSA).
Annual Report published: Y CAA Annual Reports (in Czech only):
http://www.caa.cz/urad/vyrocni‐zpravy
Website: www.caa.cz
The organisational chart of the CAA is in Annex B.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 10 Released Issue
Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic (ANS CR)
Services provided
Governance: State enterprise Ownership: 100% Ministry of Transport
Services provided Y/N Comment
ATC en‐route Y
ATC approach Y Partly; APP Service is provided in TMA Praha, Ostrava‐Mosnov, Brno‐Turany and Karlovy Vary
ATC Aerodrome(s) Y Partly; TWR service is provided at Praha‐Ruzyně, Ostrava‐Mosnov, Brno‐Turany and Karlovy Vary
AIS Y Only civil side
CNS Y
MET N MET service is provided by the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute re‐certified in 4/2017 by NSA (valid indefinitely)
ATCO training Y
Others N
Additional information:
Provision of services in other State(s):
Y ATC services are provided for small parts of Polish, German and Austrian airspace around states boundaries. See AIP CR accessible at http://lis.rlp.cz/ais_data/www_main_control/frm_en_aip.htm
Annual Report published: Y http://www.rlp.cz/en/company/performance/Pages/reports.aspx
Website: www.ans.cz
The organisation chart is in Annex B.
ATC systems in use
Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 N ‐
FDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales – EUROCAT 2000 system (main system on EC position)
CS SOFT – ESUP (main FDP system)
ICC – IDP/WALDO (main system on PC position and backup system for EC, main system for APP of regional airports)
Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Regular updates twice per year
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? Public tender for the new system finished in 2014. Operation of the new system planned for 2021.
ATC Unit ACC Praha, APP Praha,
APP/TWR of regional airports
1Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 11 Released Issue
SDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: EUROCONTROL – ARTAS (main SDPS)
Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Finalization of hardware upgrade planned for 2018,
Software upgrade performed regularly based on a new SW version provided by EUROCONTROL.
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? N/A
ATC Unit ACC Praha, APP Praha
ATC Units
The ATC units in the Czech Republic airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:
ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks
En‐route TMA
Praha ACC 10/12* ‐ FIR Praha MIL ACC terminated, provision of en‐
route services was transferred to ANS CR since May 2014
Praha APP ‐ 4 Praha‐Ruzyně
Brno APP 1 1 Brno‐Tuřany
Karlovy Vary APP 1 1 Karlovy Vary
Ostrava APP 1 1 Ostrava‐Mošnov
MIL APP ‐ 4 Čáslav, Náměšť, Kbely, Pardubice
* 10 sectors opened during peaks in summer 2017; 12 sectors are technically available in ACC Prague.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 12 Released Issue
Airports
General information
The major international airport of the Czech Republic is Praha‐Ruzyně Airport operated by Prague Airport, (Letiště Praha, a. s.) a joint stock company.
Other smaller airports such as Brno‐Tuřany, Ostrava‐Mošnov and Karlovy Vary have been progressively transferred to respective regional governments.
Brno‐Tuřany Airport was leased to a private operator Letiště Brno, a.s. on 1st July 2002, followed by Ostrava‐Mošnov Airport (leased to Letiště Ostrava, a.s.) and Karlovy Vary (leased to Letiště Karlovy Vary, s.r.o.) on 1st July 2004.
There are two industry airports, AERO‐Vodochody Plc in Vodochody (airport Prague Vodochody) and Aircraft Industries Plc in Kunovice.
There is one military airport with civil traffic operations in Pardubice.
Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives. So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP: Praha‐Ruzyně (known as Václav Havel Airport Prague, LKPR). The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/LKPR
Military Authorities
The Military Authorities involved in ATM in Czech Republic are composed of:
‐ The Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection Division of MoD (MAA);
‐ The Air Force Development Department of the Capability Development and Planning Division MoD (CDPD);
‐ The Air Force Headquarters.
Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.
An organisational chart of the Czech Republic Aviation structure is in Annex B.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 13 Released Issue
Regulatory role
Regulatory framework and rule‐making
Oversight
OAT GAT
OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?
Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?
Y
Level of such legal provision: State Law and Ministerial Decree
Level of such legal provision: State Law and Ministerial Decree
Authority signing such legal provision: the President of the CR, Prime Minister, Chairman of Parliament and Minister of Defence
Authority signing such legal provision: the President of the CR, Prime Minister, Chairman Parliament and Minister of Defence
These provisions cover: These provisions cover:
Rules of the Air for OAT Y
Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y
OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y
ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y
ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y
ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification Y
ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Y
Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability Y
Aircrew Licensing Y
Additional Information: ‐ Additional Information: Special agreements between MoD and MoT exist that cover the responsibilities; ongoing process
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
National AIP Y National AIP Y
National Military AIP Y National Military AIP Y
EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N
Other: CENOR FLIP (Central and Northern Region Flight Information Publication)
Y Other: N
OAT GAT
National oversight body for OAT: MAA, Czech Air Force Headquarters
NSA (as per SES Reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: MAA
Additional information: None Additional information: MoD is an oversight body according to Civil aviation act.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 14 Released Issue
Service Provision role
Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?
N If YES, since: ‐ Duration of the Certificate:
‐
Certificate issued by: ‐ If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?
Y
Additional Information: None
User role
OAT GAT
Services Provided: Services Provided:
En‐Route Y MIL (limited, GCI only)* En‐Route N
Approach/TMA Y MIL ANSP (MAPPs) Approach/TMA Y
Airfield/TWR/GND Y MIL ANSP (MTWR) Airfield/TWR/GND Y
AIS Y MIL AIS Y
MET Y MIL MET Y
SAR Y Integrated civil military SAR Y
TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y
Other: ‐ Other: ‐
Additional Information:
Tactical co‐ordination with Air Defence (AD) unit
* GCI ‐ Ground Control Intercept unit
Additional Information: Above information are concerned of military services provided basically for State aircraft, in specific cases (joint used airports, etc.) also for civil traffic.
FIS is provided by AD ATC unit only, no specific working position is established.
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?
OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y
If Military fly OAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:
Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N
Within the regular (GAT) national route network N Under radar control Y
Within a special OAT route system N Under radar advisory service N
If Military fly GAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:
No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges N
Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y
CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y
Others: Above mentioned CNS exemptions are applied case by case to state aircraft when requested in the flight plan.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 15 Released Issue
Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
Military in CZ applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y
FUA Level 1 implemented: Y
FUA Level 2 implemented: Y
FUA Level 3 implemented: Y
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 16 Released Issue
2. Traffic and Capacity
Evolution of traffic in Czech Republic 2.1.
2017
Traffic in the Czech Republic increased by 1.8% during Summer 2017 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2016.
2018‐2022
The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year Forecast predicts an average annual growth between 0.8% and 4.8%, with a baseline growth of 2.7%.
0
200.000
400.000
600.000
800.000
1.000.000
1.200.000
2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F
IFR
flig
hts
Czech Republic - Annual IFR Movements
IFR movements - Actuals
IFR movements - Baseline forecast
IFR movements - High forecast
IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast
2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 FH 3.8% 7.2% 4.9% 4.6% 3.8% 3.4% 2.7%B 3.1% 6.5% 6.9% 3.4% 5.0% 2.4% 2.3% 1.9% 2.1% 2.1%L 2.9% 3.0% -0.2% 0.7% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3%
ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7%
EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017)IFR flights yearly growth
Czech Republic
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 17 Released Issue
ACC Prague 2.2.
Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022
Performance summer 2017
Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
+1.5 % 187 (+3%) 0.16 0.07 No
The average en‐route delay per flight increase from 0.01 minutes per flight in Summer 2016 to 0.07 minutes per flight in the Summer 2017.
62% of the delays were due to Weather, 29% were for the reason ATC Capacity and 8% due to ATC Staffing.
Capacity Plan: +0% Achieved Comments
Additional FRA DCTs Yes
Improved coordination with military Yes
Improved flow and capacity management techniques, including STAM
Yes
Improved ATS route network Yes Implementation in Nov. 2017
Enhanced sectorisation according to the FABCE Airspace Plan Yes Implementation in Nov. 2017 at the
interface with Austria
CPDLC Yes
Optimised opening schemes Yes
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Peak Day Traffic 2358 2416 2561 2690 2731
Summer Traffic 2063 2120 2280 2403 2440
Yearly Traffic* 1804 1849 1976 2098 2204
Summer Traffic Forecast 2516 2588 2642 2695 2755
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 2576 2699 2822 2937 3038
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 2466 2466 2486 2496 2502
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.07
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
En
rou
te D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LKAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 18 Released Issue
Datalink Yes
Adaptation of sector opening times depending on available staff Yes
Monitoring of traffic evolution and evaluation of possible scenarios Yes
Maximum configuration: 9/10 sectors Yes 10 sectors were opened
Summer 2017 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS and was assessed to be at 187. The peak 1 hour demand was 180 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 169 flights.
Planning Period 2018‐2022
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Profiles
ACC 2017
baseline
Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
2018 2019
LKAA 187
H 187 0% 187 0%
Ref. 187 0% 187 0%
L 187 0% 187 0%
Open 187 0% 187 0%
C/R 193 3% 197 2%
Summer Capacity Plan
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Free Route Airspace Full FRA
Impl. in Dec 2021
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
ASM tool (equiv. to LARA)
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management Improved flow and capacity management
techniques, including STAM
Airspace
Improved ATS route network
New
sectorisation
Procedures
Staffing Additional controllers Additional controllers
Technical Implementation of a new system
Capacity Adaptation of sector opening times depending on available staff
Significant Events
Reconstruction of the OPS room and implementation of the new
ATM system
Training for the new
sectorisation
Training for the new system
Training for the FRA
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 19 Released Issue
Max sectors 10 10 13 13 15
Planned Annual Capacity Increase
0% 0% 2% 1% 2%
Reference Profile Annual % Increase
0% 0% N/A N/A N/A
Current Routes Profile % Increase
3% 2% N/A N/A N/A
Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile
0.0% 0.0% N/A N/A N/A
Difference Capacity Plan v. Current Routes Profile
‐3.1% ‐5.1% N/A N/A N/A
Annual Reference Value (min) 0.10 0.10 N/A N/A N/A
Summer reference value (min) 0.16 0.16 N/A N/A N/A
Additional information
The training for the new sectorisation and the implementation will be subject of the transition planning process in 2019/20. From 2020 the OPS room will be split into two parts with the maximum number of 10 sectors available for the current ATM system. However, the new sectorisation will deliver three additional sectors in 2020 in a lower airspace (3 terminal sectors up to FL 285 served from regional ATC Units). The migration to the new system is planned for winter season 2020/21. The capacity availability throughout the project lifecycle will be subject the transition planning process.
The graphs above shows an outline of available sector configurations for a typical weekday and a weekend day for summer 2018.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
00:00
02:00
04:00
06:00
08:00
10:00
12:00
14:00
16:00
18:00
20:00
22:00
Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018Mon. ‐Wed.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
00:00
02:00
04:00
06:00
08:00
10:00
12:00
14:00
16:00
18:00
20:00
22:00
Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018Thu. ‐ Fri.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 20 Released Issue
2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook
The capacity gap may be expected in Prague ACC if traffic continues to fly on currents routes during the planning period.
In 2019 the preparation for airspace reorganisation (expected in 2019/20) and the new system (expected in 2020/21) will start, and the capacity gap may occur in 2019.
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 187 187
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 187 187
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 193 197
Capacity Profile ‐ High 187 187
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 187 187
Capacity Baseline 181 187
2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 187 187 191 193 197
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
LKAAACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 21 Released Issue
3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions
Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to the Czech Republic for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.
Conclusion Applicable to VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT
ROUTING.
THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS.
(page 14 of the Report)
All State that are
implementing
AOM21.1 and
AOM21.2 State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES
Description of the planned action: Objective AOM21.1 is completed. As for objective AOM21.2, the
completion is planned for 2021.
Conclusion Applicable to ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY
CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) All States + EC
State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES
Description of the planned action: Further implementation of ADQ requirements depends on successful
upgrade of AIM system, which is planned for 2018.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 22 Released Issue
4. Implementation Projects
National projects 4.1.
The main projects currently ongoing in Czech Republic are depicted in the table below.
Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:
AMHS ASP ANS CR (CZ) Start: 2011 Finish: 1/2018
Compeleted L3: COM10
AOP / APOC Prague Airport (CZ) ‐ ‐ ‐
Aeronautical Information Distribution Service (2015_243_AF5)
ASP ANS CR (CZ) 01/06/2016 ‐ 31/12/2018 ‐ DP2016: 201_243_AF5
Airport CDM ASP ANS CR (CZ), Prague Airport (CZ) Start: 2008 Finish 2015
Completed in 2015 L3: AOP05
Conversion to the 8.33 kHz channel spacing below FL195
ASP ANS CR (CZ), MIL ASP (CZ), Prague Airport (CZ)
Start: 2016 Finish: 11/2017
Completed L3: ITY‐AGVCS2
Flexible ASM and Free Route (2015_239_AF3)
ASP ANS CR (CZ) 01/03/2016 ‐ 01/12/2021 ‐ DP2016: 2015_239_AF3
Free Route implementation into ATM system of ANS CR (2015_242_AF3)
ASP ANS CR (CZ) 01/03/2016 ‐ 04/11/2021 ‐ DP2016: 2015_242_AF3
Meteorological Information Exchange Service (2015_241_AF5)
ASP ANS CR (CZ) 01/03/2016 ‐ 01/12/2020 ‐ DP2016: 2015_241_AF5
NEOPTERYX ‐ the new DPS system for ACC/APP Praha
ASP ANS CR (CZ) Start 2010 Finish 2021
Ongoing ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 23 Released Issue
Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:
RET J Prague Airport (CZ) Start: 2019, End: 2019 ‐ ‐
RET Y Prague Airport (CZ) ‐ ‐ ‐
RWY 06R/24L Prague Airport (CZ) Start: 2021 Finish: 2024
Preparatory phase. The EIA process is completed.
‐
Traffic Complexity Tools (2015_240_AF4)
ASP ANS CR (CZ) 15/02/2016 ‐ 31/12/2018 ‐ DP2016: 2015_240_AF4
VoIP ASP ANS CR (CZ), CDPD (CZ), CZ Air Force (CZ)
Start 2007 Finish 2020
Ongoing L3: COM11
pRWY Prague Airport (CZ) ‐ ‐ ‐
FAB projects 4.2.
Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links:
FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free Route Airspace Study) (FAB CE Project 1)
ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI)
Project 1: Start 3.1.2011, End: Continuous Project 1 FAB CE FRA Study: Start: 1.9.2015, End: 21.4.2017
FAB CE FRA Study is completed Other activities, including monitoring FRA implementation, are ongoing
L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2
RP2 PP: FAB CE FRA Project (described under NSP actions 'FAB CE Airspace and route structure planning' and 'Free Route Airspace')
DP2016: 102AF3 – Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 24 Released Issue
Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links:
FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM (FAB CE DAM/STAM Study)
ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI)
DAM/STAM Study: Start: 7.2.2017, End: 31.12.2018
Ongoing L3: AOM19.1, AOM19.2, AOM19.3, FCM04.1, FCM04.2, FCM05, FCM06
RP2 PP: Advanced Airspace Management (described under NSP actions)
DP2016: 2016_075_AF3_A
FAB CE wide Study of DAM and STAM (PCP under CEF2016 Call)
Surveillance Infrastructure Optimisation (FAB CE Project 18)
ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI)
Start: 6.7.2016, End: 28.2.2018 Ongoing, in the finalization phase
RP2 PP: Optimisation of CNS resources
X‐Bone HW Procurement (FAB CE Project 17)
ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI)
Start: 19.2.2016, End: 30.4.2018 Common procurement finalized, in the implementation phase
RP2 PP: Optimisation of CNS resources
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 25 Released Issue
Regional projects 4.3.
Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:
AMAN LOWW initial (AMAN LOWW initial)
ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové slu by Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK)
Start: 2.1.2016 End: 31.12.2020
Ongoing L3: ATC07.1, ATC15.1 DP2016: 2015_234_AF1 AMAN LOWW initial RP2 PP: Project taken into account under 3.1.(c).(ii) ‐ Capacity KPI #2: Terminal and airport ANS ATFM arrival delay per flight
Extended AMAN in Czech Airspace (2015_196_AF1_B)
ASP ANS CR (CZ), Belgocontrol (BE), DSNA (FR), LVNL ‐ Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland (NL), MUAC ANSP (MAS), Skyguide (CH)
15/02/2016 ‐ 31/12/2020 ‐ DP2016: 2015_196_AF1_B
Gate One Free Route Airspace Operational Framework Study (GO FRA OF Study)
ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), BULATSA (BG), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové slu by Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), M‐NAV (MK), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT), PANSA (PL), ROMATSA (RO), SMATSA (BA), Slovenia Control (SI)
Start: 1.9.2017, End: 30.11.2019 Planned CEF Application is being finalised under CEF Call 2016
L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2 DP2016: CEF Application will be submitted as a part of PCP under CEF2016 Call
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 26 Released Issue
5. Cooperation activities
FAB Co‐ordination 5.1.
Having signed and ratified the Agreement on the Establishment of Functional Airspace Block Central Europe, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia are part of FAB CE.
The FAB CE States agreed on establishment of the following permanent bodies ‐ the FAB CE Council, NSA Coordination Committee and Joint Civil‐Military Airspace Coordination Committee. The FAB CE Council can also establish other bodies necessary for the implementation, operation and further development of the FAB CE Project. For this reason the FAB CE Legal Committee and the FAB CE Performance Body (responsible for preparation of FAB CE Performance Plan for RP2) have been established.
The air navigation service providers of the FAB CE countries established a joint company FABCE Aviation Services, Ltd already in 2014 and the company is responsible for the professional management of various regional air navigation projects. The establishment of this joint venture is not only effectively aiming at the progress of the FAB CE programme, but at the same time the Single European Sky programme of the European Union.
In 2016, there was a major update of the FAB CE Strategy. The FAB CE Strategic Objectives, defined in this version of the Strategy, cover the period until 2020, and address also the FAB CE long term strategic vision. This was followed by the update of the FAB CE High Level Plan which provides the link how the FAB CE intends to achieve full compliance with the Deployment Programme and achievement of all strategic goals through cooperation’s, projects and tasks. This is done by assessing existing gaps between the present state of implementation activities and the SESAR DP and by pointing towards activities and initiatives established to close those ‘gaps’ and reach achievement of all the high‐level targets. The High Level Plan is going through regular updates on an annual basis.
In addition to FAB CE projects, the FAB CE ANSPs coordinate also their regional Free Route Airspace initiatives including South Eastern Europe Night Free Route Airspace (SEEN FRA) involving Hungary and DANUBE FAB, SEAFRA (South‐East Axis Free Route Airspace) involving Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia and SAXFRA (Slovenian Austrian Cross Border Free Route Airspace). In 2017, the ANSPs worked hard on merging the SEAFRA and SAXFRA initiatives into the South East Common Sky Initiative Free Route Airspace (SECSI FRA) which has been successfully implemented, with the support of the Network Manager.
FAB CE continues to actively cooperate and share information and lessons learnt with other FABs. In 2017, FAB CE participated in a number of inter‐FAB workshops, including Inter‐FAB communications workshop in Langen, Inter‐FAB Point of Contact (PoC) workshop in Malta and Inter‐FAB operational workshop organised by FAB CE in Ljubljana. FAB CE also continues to coordinate its activities with other ANSPs of the Gate One initiative consisting of three FABs (Baltic FAB, DANUBE FAB and FAB CE) and two non‐EU ANSPs (MNAV and SMATSA).
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 27 Released Issue
Regional cooperation 5.2.
Regional cooperation initiatives
The Czech Republic is involved in international activities in the field of ATM like the EATM and NM
developments. The ANS of CR actively participates in a number of working teams of international organisation
(e.g. EUROCONTROL, CANSO), Co‐operation and co‐ordination exists with bordering ECAC States (Austria,
Germany, Poland, and the Slovak Republic) especially on the field of airspace design. In order to achieve some
of the ATM MP L3 Implementation Objectives, Praha ACC will have to co‐ordinate some of its actions with a
number of foreign adjacent ACCs/UAC. Military regional coordination within NATO environment (Germany,
Poland and Slovak Republic) is based on common NATO procedures.
The Czech Republic has been involved in a process of establishing a more formalized framework in the field of
cross‐border provision of air navigation services with two of its neighbouring countries: Germany and Poland.
In each case, the ultimate goal is to have a three‐layer scheme of agreements: on the level of (i) states, (ii)
ANSPs and (iii) NSAs. Still, the process of concluding a bilateral international treaty approved by a law‐making
body is generally a lengthy and difficult one. Therefore, for sake of flexibility, the countries involved opted for
a more flexible solution.
In December 2014, relevant agreements were concluded on the level of Czech and German NSAs as well as
ANSPs (ANS CR and DFS) even before the state level treaty would be finalized. Similar agreement was
subsequently concluded also between Czech and Polish NSAs in December 2015.
The Agreement between Czech and German NSAs (as well as the agreement between the Czech and Polish
NSAs) provide for mutual cooperation of the relevant bodies concerning supervision of cross‐border provision
of ANS. It covers in particular exchange of information, procedures for joint supervision and mutual
recognition of supervisory tasks. The Agreement is intended to fulfill requirements of Art. 2(5) of Regulation
(EC) 550/2004.
The two ANSP level agreements between ANS CR and DFS represent agreements within the sense of Art. 10(2)
and (3) of Regulation (EC) 550/2004. They are complex arrangements between the providers covering cross‐
border provision of ANS, including, e.g., procedures and principles for compliance with applicable rules,
occurrence reporting, notifications, liability or insurance.
B4 Consortium
B4 Consortium was set up formally on 8 September 2014 by PANSA (Poland), ANS CR (Czech Republic), LPS SR
(Slovak Republic) and „Oro navigacija” (Lithuania) representing small and medium‐sized European Air
Navigation Service Providers.
The B4 Consortium is a member of A6+ on SESAR 2020 Programme content. As outcome of SJU membership
negotiation the B4 Consortium has become a member of SJU from July 6, 2016.
By the end of 2016 the B4 Consortium has started elaborating Industrial research projects within the SJU. The
outcomes of the commonly financed projects are expected to pave the way towards the new generation air
traffic management system capable of ensuring improved safety and efficiency of air transport in Europe.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 28 Released Issue
B4 Consortium considers the vast expertise of its members in ATM operational and technical domains, Project
and Quality management and experience in execution of several high complexity ATM projects as well as the
expertise and experience of its Linked Third Parties ranging from scientific research, concept developments, up
to product prototyping and manufacturing highly beneficial for the successful accomplishment of the SESAR
2020 program objectives.
B4 Consortium together with its Linked Third Parties can see its role in SESAR 2020 Projects not only in
eliminating current absence of small and medium‐sized ANSPs in the SESAR projects but also in bringing
different experiences and approaches to the SESAR 2020 programme by providing the SJU with its broadly
experienced and highly motivated staff and well‐equipped facilities.
Regional projects
Project MALORCA
ANS CR has been actively involved in SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research project called MALORCA (Machine
Learning of Speech Recognition Models for Controller Assistance) since April 1, 2016. ANS CR is one of five
beneficiaries involved in this projects (other member of Consortium are DLR – Germany (Coordinator), USAAR ‐
Germany, IDIAP ‐ Switzerland and Austrocontrol – Austria).
In 2017, the ABSR (Assistant Based Speech Recognition) prototype created by DLR and USAAR was
demonstrated at the 1st MALORCA Stakeholder workshop in Prague (2017‐04‐12) organized by ANS CR. Its
purpose was to get early feedback from the users, i.e. the controllers and speech recognition/machine learning
experts, with respect to the planned proof‐of‐concept trials. The feedback was used to improve the prototype,
and was demonstrated again to controllers at pre‐proof‐of‐concept trials in Prague (2017‐10‐10). The main
work of ANS CR was focussed on Work package 5 – Proof of Concept, preparation of proof‐of‐concept trials
planned in January 2018, where the hypothesis that unsupervised learning will improve command recognition
rates and reduce the adaptation costs was set as the main objective.
INEA CEF Call 2014 projects with ANS CR contribution
Project ID Project Name Project Leader / Contributors (if any)
Project Duration
102AF3 Free Route Airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea
HCL / ANS CR + FAB CE ANSPs 1.9.2015 ‐ 21.4.2017
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 29 Released Issue
INEA CEF Call 2015 projects with ANS CR contribution
Project ID Project Name Project Leader / Contributors (if any)
Project Duration
2015_234_AF1_B AMAN LOWW initial ACG / ANS CR + LPS + HCL 1.3.2016 ‐ 31.12.2018
2015_196_AF1_B* Extended AMAN in Czech airspace
ANS CR / DFS+others(separate proposal)
1.2.2016 ‐ 31.12.2017
2015_239_AF3 Flexible ASM and Free Route ANS CR 1.3.2016 ‐ 1.12.2020
2015_242_AF3 Free Route implementation into ATM system of ANS CR
ANS CR 1.3.2016 ‐ 31.3.2020
2015_240_AF4 Traffic Complexity Tools ANS CR 15.2.2016 ‐ 31.12.2018
2015_174_AF5_B NewPENS Stakeholders contribution for the procurement and deployment of NewPENS
EUROCONTROL / ANS CR + others 15.2.2016 ‐ 31.12.2020
2015_243_AF5 Aeronautical Information Distribution Service
ANS CR 1.6.2016 ‐ 31.12.2018
2015_145_AF5_B AIM Deployment Toolkit EUROCONTROL / ANS CR + others 1.4.2016 ‐ 31.12.2020
2015_241_AF5 Meteorological Information Exchange Service
ANS CR / CHMI (Czech Hydrometeorological Institute)
1.3.2016 ‐ 1.12.2020
2015‐EU‐TM‐0242‐W
Deployment of harmonised and interoperable high Performance European Surveillance System
EUROCONTROL / ANS CR + NAV Portugal
1.3.2016 ‐ 31.12.2020
INEA CEF Call 2016 projects with ANS CR contribution
Project ID Project Name Project Leader / Contributors (if any)
Project Duration
2016_075_AF3_B FAB CE wide Study of DAM and
STAM ‐ Cohesion Call FAB CE Ltd/ ANS CR + other FAB CE ANSPs
7.2.2017 ‐ 31.12.2018
2016_064_AF5 AIMSIL ‐ AIM Systems Integration Layer
ANS CR 1.5.2017 ‐ 30.11.2020
2016_065_AF5 SWIM implementation into ATS INFO/ARO system of ANS CR
ANS CR 1.9.2017 ‐ 1.12.2020
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 30 Released Issue
6. Implementation Objectives Progress
State View 6.1.
Overall Objective Implementation
Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives
A number of ESSIP objectives have been already completed: AOM13.1 (Harmonise Operational Air Traffic
(OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling), AOM21.1 (Direct Routing), AOP04.1 (Implement ASMGC Level1),
AOP04.2 (Implement A‐SMGCS Level 2), AOP05 (Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)),
ENV02 (Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports), FCM04.1 (Short Term ATFCM
Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1), ITY‐ACID (Aircraft identification), ITY‐AGDL (Initial ATC Air‐ground Data Link
Services), ITY‐AGVCS2 (8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195), ITY‐FMTP (Apply a common
flight message transfer protocol), NAV03.1 (RNAV 1 in TMA Operations), NAV10 (APV procedures), ATC16
(Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1), FCM01 (Implement enhanced tactical flow
management services), INF04 (Implement integrated briefing), ITY‐COTR (Implementation of ground‐ground
automated co‐ordination processes); from which FCM04.1, ITY‐AGDL and ITY AGVCS2 were completed during
the last LSSIP cycle.
With regard to objectives due for 2015–2017 and earlier, the Czech Republic is late in implementing objectives
ATC02.2 (Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route
operations) and ATC02.8 (Ground‐based Safety Nets) which are both implemented for the main ATC units
(Prague ACC/APP), APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary, but implementation at APP Brno is planned to be
completed by 2018, ATC15.1 (Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN) where basic algorithm
of production of AMA message is implemented in our en‐route system, but operational use depends on
implementation of AMAN system in Munich, Vienna and other airports. Also FCM03 (Collaborative Flight
Planning) is late – AFP messages were technically implemented and operational internal tests and tests with
NM are planned for 2018. Furthermore ITY‐ADQ (Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical
Information) is late, but there is a plan for implementation for 2018.
17; 37%
8; 18%
2; 4%
11; 24%
8; 17%
Completed
Ongoing
Planned
Late
No Plan
Not Applicable
Missing Data
Undefined
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 31 Released Issue
Plans for completing Objectives, especially those due for 2018 and 2019: AOP11 (Initial Airport Operations
Plan) is ongoing with expected completion in 2019, AOP12 (Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with
Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC)) is
ongoing with planned completion in 2018, ATC02.8 (Ground‐Based Safety Nets) planned for 2018 and ATC02.9
(Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs) both objectives are ongoing and planned for 2018,
ATC15.1 (Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN) planned for 2018, ATC17 (Electronic
Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer) planned for 2019, COM10
(Migrate from AFTN to AMHS) planned for 2019, FCM03 (Collaborative Flight Planning) planned for 2018,
FCM04.2 (Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2) is ongoing and planned for completion in 2018,
FCM06 (Traffic Complexity Assessment) is ongoing and planned for completion in 2018, INF07 (Electronic
Terrain and Obstacle Data) planned for 2018, ITY‐ADQ (Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical
Information) planned for 2018, ATC02.2 (Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert
(STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations) is also planned for 2018.
Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature
Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C.
Legend:
## % = Expected completion / % Progress = ESSIP Timeline (different colour per KF)
100% = Objective Completed = Completion beyond ESSIP Timeline
Optimised ATM Network Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling
100%
AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA 10%
AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data 0%
AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing
0%
-
FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services 100%
FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 84%
FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 100%
FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 5%
FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP 3%
FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment 30%
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 32 Released Issue
Advanced Air Traffic Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing 100%
AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace 15%
AOP14 Remote Tower Services Local objective 0%
-
ATC02.2 STCA En‐Route 68%
ATC02.8 Ground‐Based Safety Nets 63%
ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs 95%
ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport 0%
ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring
26%
ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN
63%
ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace
0%
-
ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 100%
ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer
48%
ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Local objective 0%
-
ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective
LKPR ‐ PRAHA/RUZYNE - 0%
ITY‐COTR Ground‐Ground Automated Co‐ordination Processes
100%
NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100%
NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations 0%
-
NAV10 APV procedures 100%
NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft
Local objective 0%
-
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 33 Released Issue
High Performing Airport Operations
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport 100%
AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport 100%
AOP05 Airport CDM
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport 100%
AOP10 (PCP) Time‐Based Separation
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
9%
AOP12 (PCP) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
35%
AOP13 (PCP) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport 100%
SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions
18%
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 34 Released Issue
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 33%
COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 68%
COM12 (PCP) NewPENS 0%
FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 0%
-
INF04 Integrated Briefing 100%
INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 65%
ITY‐ACID Aircraft Identification 100%
ITY‐ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information
22%
ITY‐AGDL Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services 100%
ITY‐AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195
100%
ITY‐FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100%
ITY‐SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 71%
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 35 Released Issue
ICAO ASBU Implementation
The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.
These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).
Legend:
= Completed (during 2017 or before)
= Missing planning date
= Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable
<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance
100%
B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2)
100%
B0‐FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground‐Ground Integration
100%
83%
B0‐DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management
100%
61%
B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%
B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets
100%
79%
B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through 100%
B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)
100%
32%
B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories
100%
70%
B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network‐Wide view
100%
92%
B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%
71%
B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)
B0‐TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En‐Route
100%
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 36 Released Issue
Detailed Objectives Implementation progress 6.2.
Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C.
Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:
Completed No Plan
Ongoing Not Applicable
Planned Missing Data
Late
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 37 Released Issue
Main Objectives
AOM13.1
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
100% Completed
‐
Completed as of May 1, 2014. (establishment of integrated CIV‐MIL ACC). 31/12/2014
REG (By:12/2018)
MoT CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
MAA ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2012
ASP (By:12/2018)
CZ Air Force Completed as of May 1, 2014 (establishment of integrated CIV‐MIL ACC).
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
MIL (By:12/2018)
CZ Air Force ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
‐
MAA ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2012
AOM19.1
ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
10% Late
‐
ASP: Improved ASM/ATFCM process, ASP plans the implementation of remaining SLOAs for 2021. MoD participates on national level of implementation of these objectives. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.
31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2018)
CZ Air Force MoD participates on national level of implementation of these objectives.
‐ 10% Late
31/12/2021
CDPD MoD participates on national level of implementation of these objectives.
‐ 10% Late
31/12/2021
ASP ANS CR Improved ASM/ATFCM process, ASP plans the implementation of remaining SLOAs for 2021.
FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace
Management (DAM) and
STAM
10%
Late
31/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 38 Released Issue
AOM19.2
ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% Planned
‐
Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.
31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
ASP ANS CR Planned for 2021 (according to SDM).
FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace
Management (DAM) and
STAM
0%
Planned
31/12/2021
AOM19.3
Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% No Plan
‐
Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.
‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
ASP ANS CR ‐
FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace
Management (DAM) and
STAM
0%
No Plan
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 39 Released Issue
AOM21.1
Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017
100% Completed
‐
FRA has been implemented since February 5, 2015. See also FAB CE projects context ‐ details in Chapter 5.
05/02/2015
ASP (By:12/2017)
ASP ANS CR FRA has been implemented since February 5, 2015.
FAB CE Strategic
Operational Planning
Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free
Route Airspace Study) / Gate One Free Route Airspace
Operational Framework
Study
100%
Completed
05/02/2015
AOM21.2
Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
15% Ongoing
‐
Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects – see details in Chapter 5. 04/11/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
ASP ANS CR Elementary FRA feasibility study was created.
FAB CE Strategic
Operational Planning
Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free
Route Airspace Study) / Gate One Free Route Airspace
Operational Framework
Study
15%
Ongoing
04/11/2021
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 40 Released Issue
AOP04.1
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
100% Completed
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport
Czech Republic has implemented the Objective. ANS CR was member of BETA research project (2000‐2002) which evaluated operational impact of A‐SMGCS. System NOVA 9000 (produced by Park Air Systems) is installed in Prague Ruzyne airport.
‐
REG (By:12/2010)
CAA CR All actions are completed. ‐ 100% Completed
‐
MoT CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
‐
ASP (By:12/2011)
ASP ANS CR All actions are completed. ‐ 100% Completed
‐
APO (By:12/2010)
Prague Airport
All actions are completed. ‐ 100% Completed
‐
AOP04.2
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
100% Completed
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport
Czech Republic has implemented the Objective. The implementation and operation is the responsibility of the ASP and thus the Objective is not applicable for APO.
‐
ASP (By:12/2017)
ASP ANS CR A‐SMGCS Level 2 functionality was installed in Prague/Ruzyne airport and is in full operation.
‐ 100% Completed
‐
APO (By:12/2017)
Prague Airport
Not required (A‐SMGCS control function installed and operated by ASP).
‐ % Not
Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 41 Released Issue
AOP05
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
100% Completed
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport
Airport CDM at Praha/Ruzyne launched October 2009; TOBT is provided by GHA. TSAT procedure, DEP sequencing and CDM De‐icing procedures launched in September 2011. FUM/DPI implemented in 2015.
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2016)
ASP ANS CR ‐ Airport CDM 100% Completed
31/12/2013
APO (By:12/2016)
Prague Airport
Airport CDM at Praha/Ruzyne launched 6 Oct. 2009; TOBT is provided by GHA. TSAT procedure, DEP sequencing and CDM De‐icing procedures implemented in September 2011. FUM/DPI implemented in September 2015.
Airport CDM 100%
Completed
31/12/2015
ASP ANS CR
Airport CDM at Praha/Ruzyne launched 6 Oct. 2009; TOBT is provided by GHA. TSAT procedure, DEP sequencing and CDM De‐icing procedures implemented in September 2011. FUM/DPI implemented in September 2015.
Airport CDM 100%
Completed
31/12/2015
AOP10 Time‐Based Separation Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Prague Ruzyne Airport (LKPR) is not in the applicability area. ‐
REG (By:12/2023)
ASP (By:12/2023)
AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
9% Ongoing
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Gap analysis in progress in relation to CDM procedures. 31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2021)
ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2019
APO (By:12/2021)
Prague Airport
‐ ‐ 12% Ongoing
31/12/2019
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 42 Released Issue
AOP12
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
35% Ongoing
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
ANS CR project "Advanced Safety Nets for Prague Airport" is scheduled for years 2016 ‐ 2018; CBA for the project was finished beginning of 2016.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2020)
ASP ANS CR ANS CR project "Advanced Safety Nets for Prague Airport" is scheduled for years 2016‐ 2018; CBA for the project was finished beginning of 2016.
‐ 47% Ongoing
31/12/2018
APO (By:12/2020)
Prague Airport
‐ ‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2018
AOP13
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
CZ (LKPR) is not in the applicability area. ‐
REG (By:12/2023)
ASP (By:12/2023)
ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ % Not
Applicable
‐
ATC02.8
Ground‐Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
63% Late
‐
The APW and MSAW functions are fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018. There is currently no plan for APM implementation.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2016)
ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 60% Late
31/12/2018
CZ Air Force ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 43 Released Issue
ATC02.9
Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
95% Ongoing
‐
The STCA functions are fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2020)
ASP ANS CR
The STCA functions are fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018.
‐ 95%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
ATC07.1
AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019
0% Late
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport
There was an intention to implement AMAN based on the result of feasibility study and CBA for Prague Ruzyne AMAN/DMAN. The project is currently planned for the implementation in time span 2019 ‐ 2022 based on LKPR traffic evolution.
31/12/2022
ASP (By:12/2019)
ASP ANS CR
There was an intention to implement AMAN based on the result of feasibility study and CBA for Prague Ruzyne AMAN/DMAN. Currently the project is planned for the implementation in time span 2019 ‐ 2022 based on LKPR traffic evolution.
AMAN LOWW initial
0%
Late
31/12/2022
ATC12.1
Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
26% Ongoing
‐
Specification is part of a new ANS CR ATM System (Neopteryx) project. Full implementation is planned for 2021.
31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
ASP ANS CR Specification is part of Neopteryx project. Full implementation is planned for 2021.
‐ 26% Ongoing
31/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 44 Released Issue
ATC15.1
Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
63% Late
‐
Basic algorithm of production of AMA message is implemented in our en‐route system. Operational use depends on implementation of AMAN system in Munich, Vienna and other airports.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2017)
ASP ANS CR
Basic algorithm of production of AMA message is implemented in our en‐route system. Operational use depends on implementation of AMAN system in Munich, Vienna and other airports.
AMAN LOWW initial
63%
Late
31/12/2018
ATC15.2
Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
0% No Plan
‐
There is currently no approved plan. ‐
ASP (By:12/2023)
ASP ANS CR There is currently no approved plan. ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
ATC17
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
48% Late
‐
The implementation is ongoing; COF and MAS messages are in operational use. TIM and ROF messages are installed but not in operational use yet. The implementation of missing messages is planned before 12/2019.
31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2018)
ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 48% Late
31/12/2019
COM10
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
33% Late
‐
ANS CR implemented the capability of AMHS in January, 2018. Intention of MoD is to follow ASP but implementation depends on available budget.
31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2018)
CDPD Intention of MoD is to follow ASP but implementation depends on available budget.
‐ 0% Late
31/12/2019
ASP ANS CR ANS CR implemented the capability of AMHS in January, 2018.
AMHS 100% Completed
04/01/2018
CZ Air Force Intention of MoD is to follow ASP but implementation depends on available budget.
‐ 0% Late
31/12/2019
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 45 Released Issue
COM11
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
68% Ongoing
‐
Implementation planned for 2020 31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2020)
ASP ANS CR Implemented on regional airports. Implementation in APP/TWR Prague and ACC Prague planned for 12/2020.
VoIP 32% Ongoing
31/12/2020
CDPD For the military, planned for 12/2020. VoIP 87% Ongoing
31/12/2020
CZ Air Force For the military, planned for 12/2020. VoIP 87% Ongoing
31/12/2020
COM12
New Pan‐European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020
0% Planned
‐
ASP plans to join NewPENS. APO communication with NM ensured via ASP. 31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2024)
ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2020
APO (By:12/2024)
ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
CDO test flights were performed in 2011 and assessed in 2012. The test results proved no significant benefits. Based on results of the tests ASP decided not to publish specific CDO procedures yet. CDO is provided by "distance‐to‐go" information to A/C.
‐
ASP (By:12/2013)
ASP ANS CR
CDO test flights were performed in 2011 and assessed in 2012. The test results proved no significant benefits. Based on these results ASP decided not to publish specific CDO procedures yet. CDO is provided by "distance‐to‐go" information to A/C.
‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2013)
Prague Airport
Implementation depends on ASP plans. ‐ % Not
Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 46 Released Issue
ENV02
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
100% Completed
LKPR ‐ Praha Airport
CEM was officially launched in June 2010. Meetings are organized twice a year and on demand. Agreements on the care for the ennvironment and environmental impacts if the APO operations were signed with subjects concerned.
31/12/2012
ASP (By:12/2016)
ASP ANS CR
CEM was officially launched in June 2010. Meetings are organized twice a year and on demand. Environmental implications of aircraft operations are part of ATCO training.
‐ 100%
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2016)
Prague Airport
CEM was officially launched in June 2010. With regard to communication with concerned subjects, agreements on the care for the ennvironment and environmental impacts if the APO operations were signed.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2012
FCM03
Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
84% Late
‐
AFP messages were technically implemented, but not in operational use yet. Operational internal tests are planned for 2018, further tests with NM will follow. Full implementation is expected in 2018.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2017)
ASP ANS CR
AFP messages were technically implemented, but not in operational use yet. Operational internal tests are planned for 2018, further tests with NM will follow. Full implementation is expected in 2018.
‐ 84%
Late
31/12/2018
FCM04.1
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/10/2017
100% Completed
‐
Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.
‐
ASP (By:10/2017)
ASP ANS CR
FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace
Management (DAM) and
STAM
100%
Completed
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 47 Released Issue
FCM04.2
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
5% Ongoing
‐
Initial actions have started as part of FAB CE DAM/STAM Project (ex. P3). It is likely that STAM phase 2 will be implemented with the availability of this function in the N‐connect Tool, planned for implementation end of 2018. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2021)
ASP ANS CR ‐
FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace
Management (DAM) and
STAM
5%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
FCM05
Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
3% Ongoing
‐
Project objectives will be accomplished by developing a national ASM tool. The national ASM tool will also be interconnected to the military ASM tool and interoperable with NM. For the military, the decision has not been taken yet, however the MIL will closely cooperate with civil side. MIL is considered as low key stakeholder. AT FAB CE level implementation of interactive rolling NOP is planned through upgrade of the automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM and Perform an integration of the automated ASM support systems with the Network. All these projects will be fulfilled in accordance with the NM support, the guidance and the relevant provisions of the NM B2B Reference Manuals. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.
31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
ASP ANS CR ‐
FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace
Management (DAM) and
STAM
0%
Planned
31/12/2021
APO (By:12/2021)
Prague Airport
‐ ‐ 5% Ongoing
31/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 48 Released Issue
FCM06
Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
30% Ongoing
‐
The objective is to provide support in the management of the traffic load over LKAA area. Support should be primarily provided to Prague ACC Flow Manager position. Secondary service would be provided to Prague ACC/APP control sectors. Planned for 2018. At FAB CE level several options are discussed on whether ANSP will procure a ready‐made Complexity Assessment Tool, or will commit to develop such a tool using own resources. One solution is being discussed on the possibility to have a common FAB CE Complexity Tool, more details will be available end 02/2017. Initial actions have been made, with advanced use of CHMI functions (Associated Flows etc). Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2021)
ASP ANS CR
The objective is to provide support in the management of the traffic load over LKAA area. Support should be primarily provided to Prague ACC Flow Manager position. Secondary service would be provided to Prague ACC/APP control sectors.
FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace
Management (DAM) and
STAM
30%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
FCM08
Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% No Plan
‐
Currently there is no plan for the implementation. ‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
ASP ANS CR Currently there is no plan for the implementation. ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 49 Released Issue
INF07
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018
65% Late
‐
Planned for 12/2018. 31/12/2018
REG (By:05/2018)
MoT CR The national policy on TOD is covered by relevant provisions of the Aviation Act No 49/1997 Coll. and by associated Ministerial Decree No 108/1997 Coll.
‐ 100% Completed
‐
CAA CR
The current NSA processes will be used to verify implementation of the requirements at ANS providers and other stakeholders. The regulatory compliance shall be conducted in compliance with national TOD policy and Implementation programme.
‐ 5%
Late
31/12/2018
ASP (By:05/2018)
ASP ANS CR
ETOD is maintained by AIS ANS CR. Terrain data supplied by MIL are in conformity with requirements of ICAO Annex 15. Data supplied by airports operators do not fulfill all requirements of the Annex.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
APO (By:05/2018)
Prague Airport
Planned for ‐ 55% Late
31/12/2018
ITY‐ACID
Aircraft Identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020
100% Completed
‐
The objective has been achieved by implementation of Mode S capability. 31/12/2012
ASP (By:01/2020)
ASP ANS CR All actions completed. ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2012
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 50 Released Issue
ITY‐ADQ
Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017
22% Late
‐
The working group at national level was established and all required actions including time schedule are in preparation. Part of the requirements are fulfilled as a part of the standard NSA oversight process with regard to ICAO and SES legislation requirements. The objective will be completed when ANS CR provides new AIM system planned for 2018. MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.
31/12/2018
REG (By:06/2017)
CAA CR The working group at national level was established and all required actions including time schedule are in preparation.
‐ 53% Late
31/12/2018
MAA
The working group at national level was established. MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.
‐ 10%
Late
31/12/2018
CDPD
MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.
‐ 10%
Late
31/12/2018
ASP (By:06/2017)
ASP ANS CR
The working group at national level was established. Part of required actions are implemented; see details below. The objective will be completed when ANS CR provides new AIM system planned for 2018.
‐ 41%
Late
31/12/2018
CZ Air Force
The working group at national level was established. MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.
‐ 10%
Late
31/12/2018
CDPD
MIL has its own system. The upgrade of MIL systems to be fully compliant with Regulation (EC) 73/2010 is planned for 2018, however their implementation fully depends on the MIL budget limitations.
‐ 10%
Late
31/12/2018
APO (By:06/2017)
Prague Airport
The working group at national level was established and all required actions including time schedule are in preparation. APO is in proces of SW procurement to meet the requirements.
‐ 13%
Late
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 51 Released Issue
ITY‐AGDL
Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020
100% Completed
‐
ANS CR implemented A/G data link services on February 6, 2017. MIL has completed for state transport aircraft able to fly at or above FL 285 in compliance with EU regulation.
06/02/2017
REG (By:02/2018)
CAA CR CAA CR acts accordingly based upon the ASPs implementation plans in line with established procedures.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2016
MoT CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2016
ASP (By:02/2018)
ASP ANS CR ANS CR implemented A/G data link services on February 6, 2017.
‐ 100% Completed
06/02/2017
MIL (By:01/2019)
CDPD Completed for state transport aircraft able to fly at or above FL 285 in compliance with EU regulation.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 52 Released Issue
ITY‐AGVCS2
8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020
100% Completed
‐
NSA has enforced the requirements for voice channels spacing for new introduced radios since 2013. The safety oversight of changes in ATM will be performed as a standard procedure in terms defined by AIC C 02/13 with regard to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012. According to AIC A 8/15, the conversion of Frequency Plan was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).
31/12/2017
REG (By:12/2018)
MoT CR According to AIC 8/15, the conversion of Frequency Plan was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).
‐ 100% Completed
‐
CDPD ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
MAA ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
ASP (By:12/2018)
CZ Air Force According to AIC 8/15, the conversion of the frequency was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
CDPD According to AIC 8/15, the conversion of Frequency Plan was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
MAA According to AIC 8/15, the conversion of the frequency was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017).
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
ASP ANS CR
According to AIC A 8/15, the conversion of Frequency Plan was scheduled in 3 steps (from November 2016 to November 2017). ASP followed the Transition plan developed by MoT. RCOM system was upgraded in 2017.
Conversion to the 8.33 kHz channel spacing
below FL195
100%
Completed
31/12/2017
MIL (By:12/2020)
CZ Air Force MIL follows the national plan established by MoT with agreement of MoD.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
CDPD MIL follows the national plan established by MoT with agreement of MoD.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 53 Released Issue
APO (By:12/2018)
CZ Air Force ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
ASP ANS CR ‐
Conversion to the 8.33 kHz channel spacing
below FL195
100%
Completed
31/12/2017
Prague Airport
‐
Conversion to the 8.33 kHz channel spacing
below FL195
%
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐FMTP
Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014
100% Completed
‐
FMTP has already been implemented and is already operationally used internally (ANS CR, MIL, regional airports) and externally with exception of PL.
31/12/2014
ASP (By:12/2014)
ASP ANS CR
For ANS CR, all actions are completed. FMTP implemented with neighbours except PL. IPv4 protocol is used internally. There is a translation device for conversion from IPv4 to IPv6 on communication interface with neighbouring states.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
CDPD
For MIL all actions are completed. IPv4 protocol is used internally. There is a translation device for conversion from IPv4 to IPv6 on communication interface with ANS CR.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
CZ Air Force
For MIL all actions are completed. IPv4 protocol is used internally. There is a translation device for conversion from IPv4 to IPv6 on communication interface with ANS CR.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
MIL (By:12/2014)
CZ Air Force Completed ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
CDPD Completed ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 54 Released Issue
ITY‐SPI
Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020
71% Ongoing
‐
ASP and REG completed. MIL ongoing. 07/06/2020
REG (By:02/2015)
CAA CR The oversight of this objective's implementation falls into the CAA CR Annual Safety and Regulatory Oversight Programme.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2013
ASP (By:02/2015)
ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2013
MIL (By:06/2020)
CDPD The most of MIL transport aircraft have been equipped by EHS and ADS‐B out. Training partly completed.
‐ 23% Ongoing
07/06/2020
CZ Air Force The most of MIL transport aircraft have been equipped by EHS and ADS‐B out. Training partly completed.
‐ 23% Ongoing
07/06/2020
NAV03.1
RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
100% Completed
‐
RNAV1 procedures are implemented in TMA Prague. 31/12/2010
ASP (By:12/2023)
ASP ANS CR RNAV1 procedures were implemented in TMA Prague (in 2010).
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2010
CAA CR
The Czech Republic started implementation of PBN very soon and PBN procedures (RNAV‐1 SID,STAR, RNP APCH) are published at almost all Czech IFR airports. For the period 2016+ there is a plan for just marginal improvements of these procedures.The implementation Road Map of the PBN procedures was described within PBN questionnaire document addressed to the Network Manager.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2010
NAV03.2
RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
0% No Plan
‐
There is currently no plan for the implementation. ‐
ASP (By:12/2023)
ASP ANS CR There is currently no plan for the implementation. ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 55 Released Issue
NAV10
APV Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
100% Completed
‐
APV/Baro procedures have been implemented for Praha Ruzyne and published in AIP in 2010. APV SBAS was implemented for regional airports (LKTB, LKMT, LKKV) in 2014.
31/12/2014
REG (By:04/2016)
CAA CR Material published on CAA website. ‐ 100% Completed
30/04/2011
ASP (By:12/2016)
ASP ANS CR
APV/Baro procedures have been implemented for Praha Ruzyne and publised in AIP in 2010. APV SBAS was implemented for regional airports (LKTB, LKMT, LKKV) in 2014.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
SAF11
Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018
18% Late
‐
Implementation of SAF 11 is planned. Runway Safety Team was established during implementation of Runway Incursion Programme so general requirements (Part 3.1) are already implemented. Runway Safety Programme for the Czech Republic was published on 27.10.2016 in AIC 25/16.
31/12/2020
REG (By:01/2018)
CAA CR Documentation for the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions was published in 2016. Subsequent steps will follow.
‐ 25% Late
31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2014)
MAA
Appropriate military airports concerned need to be defined at national level, in accordance with EAPPRE. Only one MIL airport (Pardubice) has been considered for implementing the Objective; MoD uses own system on other airports.
‐ 0%
Late
31/12/2018
ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 20% Late
31/12/2018
CZ Air Force
Appropriate military airports concerned need to be defined at national level, in accordance with EAPPRE. Only one MIL airport (Pardubice) has been considered for implementing the Objective; MoD uses own system on other airports.
‐ 0%
Late
31/12/2018
APO (By:12/2014)
Prague Airport
‐ ‐ 100% Completed
‐
CZ Air Force
Appropriate military airports concerned need to be defined at national level, in accordance with EAPPRE. Only one MIL airport (Pardubice) has been considered for implementing the Objective; MoD uses own system on other airports.
‐ 0%
Late
31/12/2018
MAA
Appropriate military airports concerned need to be defined at national level, in accordance with EAPPRE. Only one MIL airport (Pardubice) has been considered for implementing the Objective; MoD uses own system on other airports.
‐ 0%
Late
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 56 Released Issue
Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring
ATC02.2
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013
68% Late
‐
STCA function is fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018. The system is implemented also by MIL and upgrade to OAT traffic specifications and validation was done in 2012.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:01/2013)
CZ Air Force
Military system is also equipped with the STCA functionality which was successfully tested. An upgrade regarding to MIL traffic specification (OAT) and validation was done.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2012
ASP ANS CR STCA function is fully implemented for ACC/APP Prague, APP Ostrava and APP Karlovy Vary. Implementation for regional APP Brno is scheduled for 2018.
‐ 55% Late
31/12/2018
ATC16
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
100% Completed
‐
ASP has completed in 03/2012. MIL completed for VIP transport a/c only (type Airbus 319‐115).
31/12/2015
REG (By:12/2015)
CAA CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2015
ASP (By:03/2012)
ASP ANS CR ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/03/2012
MIL (By:12/2015)
CZ Air Force MIL completed for VIP transport a/c only (type Airbus 319‐115).
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2015
CDPD MIL completed for VIP transport a/c only (type Airbus 319‐115).
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 57 Released Issue
FCM01
Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006
100% Completed
‐
The implementation is completed. Some SLoAs are considered as not applicable. Military system receives and processes ATFM data via ANS CR.
31/12/2014
ASP (By:07/2014)
MIL ASP Military system receives and processes ATFM data via ANS CR.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
ASP ANS CR
ANS CR has already implemented processing of CPR and FSA messages for ATFM purposes. Processing of FSA in case of rerouting inside FDPA and in case of aircraft holding is considered as not applicable in terms of cost/benefit ratio. Processing of DPI is part of A‐CDM Project.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
INF04
Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012
100% Completed
‐
IBS system was implemented at ARO in 12/2010. This system fulfiles Level 5 requirements for integrated briefing.
31/12/2010
ASP (By:12/2012)
CZ Air Force For the military, the objective has been implemented in 12/2008.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2010
ASP ANS CR IBS system was implemented at ARO in 12/2010. This system fulfiles Level 5 requirements for integrated briefing.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2010
ITY‐COTR
Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012
100% Completed
‐
All mandatory requirements of IR COTR are implemented. 31/12/2014
ASP (By:12/2012)
ASP ANS CR
All mandatory requirements of IR COTR are implemented. Implementation of "Logon Forward " (ASP08) and "Next Authority Notified" (ASP09) processes is planned in frame of A/G Datalink implementation with the implementation date in 2017.
‐ 100%
Completed
‐
MIL (By:12/2012)
CDPD ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
CZ Air Force Completed ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 58 Released Issue
Local Objectives
AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local
% No Plan
LKPR ‐ PRAHA/RUZYNE
There is currently no plan to implement Remote Tower Services in Czech Republic. ‐
ATC18 Multi‐Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local
% No Plan
‐
There is currently no plan for the implementation. ‐
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local
% No Plan
LKPR ‐ PRAHA/RUZYNE
There is no plan at the moment for application of CCO due to high traffic complexity. Future implementation of CCO is intended, but the target date has not been set.
‐
NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Applicability and timescale: Local
% No Plan
‐
There is currently no plan for implementation. ‐
Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 59 Released Issue
ANNEXES
ANNEX A ‐ Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process
LSSIP Co‐ordination
LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name
LSSIP National Focal Point for Czech Republic
ANS CR Tomáš TRŽICKÝ
LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA CAA Jaroslav PEKÁREK
LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP ANS CR Martin LINDNER
LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Prague Airport Miroslav ŠPÁK
LSSIP Focal Point for Military MoD Miloslav BENEŠ
LSSIP Focal Point for MoT MoT Zdeněk JELÍNEK
LSSIP Focal Point for AAII AAII Stanislav SUCHÝ
EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support
Function Directorate Name
LSSIP Contact Person for Czech Republic
DPS/PEPR Agnieszka DYBOWSKA
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 60 Released Issue
Implementation Objectives
Implementation Objective
EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners
National Stakeholder Specialist
AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)
AOM19.1 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /
O. MROWICKI
Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)
AOM19.2 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /
O. MROWICKI
Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)
AOM19.3 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /
O. MROWICKI
AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Václav VORÁČEK (ANS CR)
AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Václav VORÁČEK (ANS CR)
AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Jan KUBÍČEK (ANS CR)
AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Jan KUBÍČEK (ANS CR)
AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE (PRAGUE AIRPORT)
AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM Petr KUNC (ANS CR)
AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE (PRAGUE AIRPORT)
AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Jan KUBÍČEK (ANS CR)
AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM
AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE
ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)
ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)
ATC07.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)
ATC12.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)
ATC15.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)
ATC15.2 L. DELL’ORTO P. HOP
ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO S. MORTON Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)
ATC18 L. DELL’ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI Tomáš NAVRÁTIL (ANS CR)
COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU Ivo PŘÍPLATA (ANS CR)
COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU Milan DVOŘÁK (ANS CR)
COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS Martin JELÍNEK (ANS CR)
ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN Petr KUNC (ANS CR)
ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY (PRAGUE AIRPORT)
ENV03 A‐P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN
FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI
Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)
FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)
FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)
FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI
Lumír HOVANČÍK (ANS CR)
FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 61 Released Issue
FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI
INF07 A‐P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY Jiří LATIOK (ANS CR)
ITY‐ACID O. CIOARA pending Ivan UHLÍŘ (ANS CR)
ITY‐ADQ A‐P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER Radek HODAČ (ANS CR)
ITY‐AGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC Milan KORÁB (ANS CR)
ATY‐AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET Martin LEHKÝ (ANS CR)
ITY‐FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU Vladimír ČÍŽEK (ANS CR)
ITY‐SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY Ivan UHLÍŘ (ANS CR)
NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Tomáš DUKA (ANS CR)
NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Tomáš DUKA (ANS CR)
NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH Tomáš DUKA (ANS CR)
NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET
SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending (CAA)
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 62 Released Issue
ANNEX B ‐ National Stakeholders Organisation charts
CZECH REPUBLIC AVIATION ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
The overall organisational structure of the aviation regulation in the Czech Republic is represented in the following
Figure: Organisational structure of the Czech Republic Aviation Regulation
Ministry of Defence
GOVERNMENT
Ministry of Transport (Civil Aviation Department)
Air Accidents Investigation Institute
Civil Aviation Authority
Air Navigation Services
of the Czech Republic
Prague Airport
Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection
Division of MoD
Institute of Aviation Medicine
Other Airport Operators
Other ATC Providers
Civil Aircraft Operators
Czech Air Force
Air Force Development of the Capability Development and Planning Division ‐ MoD
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 63 Released Issue
CAA CR ESTABLISHMENT
The Civil Aviation Authority of the Czech Republic was established by the Czech Civil Aviation Act as a
government agency in charge of civil aviation. It is subordinate to the Ministry of Transport. See also current
detailed organisational structure at: http://www.caa.cz/authority/organisational‐structure‐1
Spokesperson Management System Manager
Security Director Quality Auditor
Internal Quality Control Safety Inspector
Secretary of the CAA Director
Informatics Section
Economic Section
Payroll Accountant
Logistics Department
Flight Operations Security Section
Air Cargo Security Section
Security Department
AdministrativeFunctioning Section
Legal Section
Legal Department
Internal Servicesand Security Division Director
Secretary
Inspector Pilot Section
Flight Operations InspectionSection
Specialised Operations Section
Non-commercial OperationsSection
Ramp Inspections Section
Aircraft OperationsDepartment
Training OrganisationSupervising Section
Aicraft Register
Personnel ExaminationSection
Practical Skill and MedicalSection
Personnel LicensingDepartment
Parachuting Section
Flight Division Director
Secretary
Product CertificationSection
Aircraft Design Section
ProductionSection
Aircraft Certification andEngineering Department
Transport AircraftSection
Maintenance Section
Small Aircraft Section
Aircraft ContinuousAirworthiness Department
Technical Division Director
Secretary
Regulation Section
Unmanned AerialSystem Section
External Relations andSpecial Activities Department
Aerodromes Section
Unmanned AerialSystem Section
External Relations andSpecial Activities Department
Interoperability Section
Supervision Section
Development Manager
FAB Coordinator
Air Navigation ServicesDepartment
Operators Section
Aeronautical OperationsDivision Director
Director of the CAA
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 64 Released Issue
AIR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION INSTITUTE (AAII)
The overall organisational chart of the AAII is shown in Figure below:
Figure: Organisational chart of the AAII
Note: With regard to a new systematization by 1. 1. 2017.
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 65 Released Issue
Prague Airport Organisational Chart
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 66 Released Issue
SIMPLIFIED ORGANISATIONAL CHART OF THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT
Minister of Transport
Transport Section
Civil Aviation Department
Air Operation, Technology and
Development Division
Air Transport Division
Aerodromes Infrastructure Division
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 67 Released Issue
SIMPLIFIED ORGANISATIONAL CHART OF ANS CR (as of January 1, 2018)
Director General
Safety Unit
Operations Unit
CNS/ATM Systems Operation Division
ATM Division
ATM Training and Business Unit
Flight Inspection Section
Business and Marketing Section
ATM Training Section
Finance and Administration Unit
Central Logistics Section
Audit and Investigation
Finance Section
Human Resources Section
Office of the Director General
Strategy and Management Support
ANS Planning and Development Division
Area Control Navigation
Services Section
Approach and Aerodrome
Control Services
Regional Airport Air Navigation Services Section
Aeronautical Telecommunications
Services Centre
Radar and Information Systems Centre
NAVCOM Centre
Air Navigation Services
Methodology
Project and Investments
Implementation
AIM Section
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 68 Released Issue
ANNEX C – Implementation Objectives’ Applicability
Objective SESAR
Key Feature
ICAO ASBU
B0 European ATM Masterplan Level 3 Applicability area
AOM13.1
‐ All ECAC States except Albania, Latvia, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and
Moldova.
AOM19.1
B0‐FRTO All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Malta, Luxembourg, and
Moldova
AOM19.2
‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova
AOM19.3
‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova
AOM21.1
B0‐FRTO 25 ECAC States
AOM21.2
‐ All ECAC States except Azerbaijan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the
Netherlands
AOP04.1
B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports
AOP04.2
B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports
AOP05
B0‐ACDM 25 PCP airports, 21 non‐PCP airports
AOP10
‐ 16 PCP Airports
AOP11
‐ 24 PCP airports, 15 non‐PCP airports
AOP12
‐ 25 PCP airports
AOP13
‐ 25 PCP airports
AOP14
‐ Local: Low to medium complexity aerodromes, subject to local needs
ATC02.2 B0‐SNET Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all ECAC States that did
not yet implement it
ATC02.8
B0‐SNET All ECAC States except the Netherlands
ATC02.9
B0‐SNET TMAs, according to local business needs
ATC07.1
B0‐RSEQ 23 PCP Airports, 8 non‐PCP airports
ATC12.1
‐ All ECAC States except Luxembourg
ATC15.1
B0‐RSEQ
EU States except Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovak
Republic, Slovenia. Plus: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maastricht UAC,
Norway, Switzerland, Turkey
ATC15.2
‐ ACCs within the extended AMAN horizon, including those adjacent to
TMAs serving/associated to PCP airports
ATC16 B0‐ACAS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that
did not yet implement it
ATC17
B0‐FICE All ECAC States except Ireland, Slovak Republic and Ukraine
ATC18
‐ Local: Subject to local needs and complexity
COM10
‐ All ECAC States
COM11
‐ All ECAC States
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 69 Released Issue
COM12
‐
‐ Area 1 (ANSPs signatories of the NewPENS Common Procurement
Agreement): 33 ANSPs
‐ Area 2 (Other stakeholders): Stakeholders from all ECAC States not part
of Area 1
ENV01
B0‐CDO 59 Airports
ENV02
‐ 47 Airports
ENV03
B0‐CCO Local: Aerodromes subject to local needs and complexity
FCM01 B0‐NOPS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that
did not yet implement it
FCM03
B0‐NOPS All ECAC States
FCM04.1
B0‐NOPS Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland,
Spain, Switzerland
FCM04.2
B0‐NOPS All EU+ States
FCM05
B0‐NOPS All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC
and Moldova
FCM06
B0‐NOPS All EU+ States
FCM07
‐ All EU+ States
FCM08
‐ All ECAC States
FCM09
‐ All ECAC States
INF04 B0‐DATM Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that
did not yet implement it
INF07
‐ All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC
INF08.1
‐ All EU+ States
INF08.2
‐ All EU+ States
ITY‐ACID
‐ All EU+ States
ITY‐ADQ
B0‐DATM All EU+ States except FYROM, Georgia and Maastricht UAC
ITY‐AGDL
B0‐TBO All EU+ States except Georgia, Luxembourg and Netherlands
ITY‐AGVCS2
‐ All EU+ States except Georgia and Moldova
ITY‐COTR B0‐FICE Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all EU+ States that did
not yet implement it
ITY‐FMTP
B0‐FICE All ECAC States
ITY‐SPI
B0‐ASUR All EU+ States
NAV03.1
B0‐CDO,
B0‐CCO All ECAC States except Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Slovak Republic
NAV03.2
‐ Mandatory for TMAs listed in section 1.2.1 of the Annex of the PCP
Regulation. For all other ECAC TMAs, according to local business needs
NAV10
B0‐APTA All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC
NAV12
‐ Local: TMAs subject to local needs and complexity
SAF11
‐ All ECAC States except Malta
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 70 Released Issue
Legend:
Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:
Optimised ATM Network Services
High Performing Airport Operations
Advanced Air Traffic Services
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
LSSIP Year 2017 Czech Republic 71 Released Issue
ANNEX D ‐ Glossary of Abbreviations
This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Czech Republic.
Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
Term Description
AAII Air Accidents Investigation Institute
AF ATM Functionality
AHA Active Hazard Assessment
Airport CDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making
ANS CR Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic
A‐SMGCS Advanced Surface Movement Guidance & Control System
CAA Civil Aviation Authority
CAD Civil Aviation Department (MoT)
CHMI Czech Hydrometeorological Institute
CDPD The Air Force Development of the Capability Development and Planning Division MoD
CTR Control Area
DFL Division Flight Level
FT Fast Track
IATCC Integrated Air Traffic Control Centre
MAA Military Aviation Authority, Supervision and Inspection Division of MoD
MCTR Military CTR
MoD Ministry of Defence
MoT Ministry of Transport
MTMA Military TMA
NOP Network Operation Plan
NSA National Supervisory Authority
PCP Pilot Common Project
PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme
RET Rapid Exit Taxiway
SRA Security Restricted Area
S‐AF Sub ATM Functionality
TWR Tower
UIR Upper Flight Information Region
Top Related