Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) UKRAINE ......LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine Released Issue...

Years 2015-2019 – Level 1

(Formally known as LCIP)

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) UKRAINE

EUROCONTROL

LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine Released Issue

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP for Ukraine

Infocentre Reference: 15/01/12-41

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2014

LSSIP Year 2014Ukraine Edition Date: 15/06/15

LSSIP Focal Point - RuslanHutsan E-mail:

[email protected]

UkSATSE

LSSIP Contact Person – Ana Paula Frangolho E-mail: ana-paula. [email protected]

Unit DPS/PEPR

Status Intended for

Working Draft General Public

Draft Agency Stakeholders

Proposed Issue Restricted Audience

Released Issue

Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Ukraine (UA) - APF\Year 2014\Released\LSSIP_2015_UA_Released.doc

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material

2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2013 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

3 ESSIP Report 2012 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

4 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

5 Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

6 European ATM Master Plan https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

8 National AIP http://www.aisukraine.net


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Years 2015-2019 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan. – Edition 2014.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1

Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4

Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographical Scope ................................................................................................................ 5

1.1.1 International Membership ......................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Geographical description of the UIR/FIR(s) .............................................................................. 5 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ................................................................................. 7 1.2 National Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 8

1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2 UkSATSE ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.2.3 Airports .................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.4 Military Authorities ................................................................................................................... 15 1.3 Air navigation services ........................................................................................................... 17

1.3.1 Current Situation ..................................................................................................................... 17 1.3.2 Air Traffic Flows above FL 275 ............................................................................................... 19 1.3.3 The conflict zones ................................................................................................................... 22 1.3.4 Safety Case ............................................................................................................................. 23

Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................................................ 26 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine ................................................................................................. 26 2.2 DNIPROPETROVSK ACC ..................................................................................................... 27

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 27 2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 27 2.2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 – Summer ................................................................................... 27 2.3 KYIV ACC .............................................................................................................................. 30

2.3.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 30 2.3.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 30 2.3.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer ................................................................................... 30 2.4 LVIV ACC ............................................................................................................................... 33

2.4.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 33 2.4.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 33 2.4.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer ................................................................................... 34 2.5 ODESA ACC .......................................................................................................................... 35

2.5.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 35 2.5.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 36 2.5.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer ................................................................................... 36

Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ........................................................................................ 39

Chapter 4 - National Projects ................................................................................................................. 41

Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ....................................................................................................... 45 5.1 Cooperation ........................................................................................................................... 45 5.1.2. Common Aviation Area Agreement ......................................................................................... 45 5.1.3. Cooperation in the area of Satellite Based Augmentation Systems – EGNOS Extension in

Ukraine ............................................................................................................................................... 45 5.2 Regional cooperation ............................................................................................................. 47

5.2.1 MoC between DHMI and UkSATSE ....................................................................................... 47 5.2.2 UkSATSE- MoldATSA, UkSATSE - ROMATSA ..................................................................... 48

Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ....................................................................................... 49

ANNEXES

LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

Due to the current situation in the Eastern part of Ukraine and Autonomous Republic of Crimea (ARC), there was an urgent need to introduce changes/reconfigurations (see Fig 4 and 5) of the Ukrainian air traffic management (ATM) system and to the air navigation services (ANS) provided by UkSATSE. Those ATM/ANS changes concerned both the Ukrainian national airspace and the airspace over the High Seas, where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements (hereinafter - airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine).

Ukraine in collaboration with EUROCONTROL developed the draft “Safety Case regarding provision of air navigation services within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements” (hereafter - Safety Case) in response to the necessity to make changes in air navigation services provision by Ukrainian State Air Traffic Services Enterprise (hereinafter referred to as UkSATSE) within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for air traffic services (ATS) provision is delegated to Ukraine by regional air navigation agreement approved by ICAO Council.

In order to minimize the effect of the identified hazards Ukraine is going to use a staged/phased approach to determine the airspace available for planning of civil aircraft flights over the High Seas (see Fig 12 for Phase Ia).The risk assessment procedure shows that the identified risks are acceptable.

Finally, the document contains the main conclusion that UkSATSE does not have any technical and procedural problems for service provision in the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine.

Traffic and Capacity

Traffic in the Ukraine decreased by 44.4% during summer 2014 (May to October inclusive), when compared to summer 2013.

ESSIP Objective Implementation

There are plans for completion of the following objectives, due for:

● 2015 - AOP03, ATC16, FCM01, ITY-FMTP ITY,-SPI, SAF10, SRC-RLMK, SRC-SLRD.

● 2016 - AOM19, AOP05, ATC12, COM09, COM10, FCM03, ITY-COTR, NAV10.


LSSIP 2014 - Ukraine

*FOC Date █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

State-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2008

20

09

2010

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

2016

20

17

2018

20

19

2020

20

21

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

[IDP] [E] *

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [IDP] [E] *

AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [IDP] [E] *

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions [IDP] *

ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 [E] *

ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 [E] *

ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 [E] *

ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 [E] *

ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E] *

ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring [E] *

ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations

[IDP] [E] *

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 *

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

[IDP] [E] *

COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)

[IDP] *

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS *

COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM *

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E] *

FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [IDP] [E] *

FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [IDP] [E]

FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [IDP] [E] *

INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) *ITY-ACID Aircraft identification

ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information [E]

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [IDP] [E]

ITY-AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes [E]

ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV [E] *

NAV10 Implement APV procedures [IDP] [E] *


LSSIP 2014 - Ukraine

*FOC Date █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements *

SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions *

SRC-RLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) *

SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies *

Airport-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2008

20

09

2010

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

2016

20

17

2018

20

19

2020

20

21

UKBB-Kiev

AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1

[E] *

AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 *

AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] [E] *

ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

[IDP] *

ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports *

Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partly Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable (Ukraine does not participate in this obj.)

Late

E= Essential – Master Plan Reference IDP = Interim Deployment Programme

NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium termimplementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. TheLSSIP document – Year 2014 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2014.

The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;

Chapter 5deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;

Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Note:Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

Note:The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment

1.1 Geographical Scope

1.1.1 International Membership

Ukraine is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC 15.12.1999

EUROCONTROL 01.05.2004

European Union No

EASA No *

ICAO 09.09.1992

NATO No

ITU

*1. Cooperation on the basis of Working Arrangements in the framework of the transition of the Joint Aviation Authorities and on collection and exchange of information on the safety of aircraft using community airports and airports of the relevant country (done at Brussels on 07 March 2007).

2. Working Arrangement between the SAAU and EASA (done at Paris 2009).

1.1.2 Geographical description of the UIR/FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses Kyiv UIR and Kyiv, Simferopol’, Dnipropetrovs’k, Odesa, L’viv FIRs.

The Ukrainian ATS Airspace is surrounded by 11FIRs of 9 different States namely, Minsk FIR (Republic of Belarus), Moscow FIR and Rostov–na-Don FIR (Russian Federation), Ankara FIR and Istanbul FIR (Republic of Turkey), SofiaFIR (Rebuplic of Bulgaria), Bucuresti FIR (Romania), Chisinau FIR (Republic of Moldova), Budapest FIR (Hungary), Bratislava FIR (Slovak Republic) and Warszawa FIR (Poland).

The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL 275.

Upper Information Region covers the whole Ukrainian ATS Airspace with vertical limits from FL 275 to UNL (fig 1).

The lateral boundaries of 5 existing FIRs of Ukraine are retained in the published boundaries in accordance with International Agreements and current edition of ICAO European Air Navigation Plan (ICAO Doc 7754) with vertical limits from ground to FL 275.


Fig.1Upper Information Region

Fig.2 The lateral boundaries of 5 existing FIRs of Ukraine


1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation

The current classification of the airspace in Ukraine is shown in the following picture (fig 3):

Fig.3 Airspace classification Note: * Airspace is unclassified. ** If flights are carried out as GAT, then airspace is classified according to the surrounding ATS airspace classification, otherwise airspace is unclassified. The Airspace of Ukraine and Airspace over the high seas where the Air Traffic Services are provided by Ukraine consists of the following structural elements:

1 Upper Flight Information Region (Kyiv UIR); 5 Flight Information Regions (Dnipropetrovs’k FIR, Kyiv FIR, L’viv FIR, Odesa FIR and

Simferopol’ FIR); 6 UTAs; 6 CTAs; 19 TMAs; 20 Control Zones (CTRs) ; 4 Aerodrome Flight Information Zones (AFIZs); Aerodrome Traffic Zones (ATZs) – usually set up for each touchdown pad; 117 ATS routes and routes set up for crossing the state border of Ukraine; 35 Prohibited Areas; 223 Restricted Areas; 78 Danger Areas; 223 Training Areas, 64 of them are stated as temporary airspace reservation; Special rules zone airspace – set up along the state border.


1.2 National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Ukraine are the following: - Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine - Ministry of Defence of Ukraine - The Regulator, the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU); - The ATM Service Provider, UkSATSE.

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the following diagram:

1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)

1.2.1.1 General information

The SAAU was created in accordance with Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 of 06.04.2011 -“Creation of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” and its activity is regulated by the Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”. The SAAU is a separate and independent regulatory body. Activity of the SAAU is controlled and directed by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine through the Minister of Infrastructure of Ukraine.

The SAAU is institutionally separated from the Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE).


The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The SAAU is further detailed in the following sections.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible

Legal Basis

Rule-making MoI, SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated19/05/2011 , Decree of the President of Ukraine N581/2011 dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine", Decrees of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” and № 401 dated 29.03.2002 “Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine”

The aviation related regulatory acts are developed by the SAAU and approved at the level of MoI.

Safety Oversight SAAU Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”,

Order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" № 320 dated 31/05/2010

Manual of Integrated management System of UkSATSE” approved by UkSATSE and agreed by SAAU on 25.12.2012.

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

SAAU “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers Certification’ approved by Order of the Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine №42 dated 22/01/2007

Airspace SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated19/05/2011, Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 401 dated 29.03.2002 “Regulation on Airspace Utilisation of Ukraine”.

Economic MoI Decree of the President of Ukraine № 581/2011 dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine".

Environment SAAU Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”

Security SAAU Low of Ukraine N545-IV dated 20/02/2003 "The State Security Programme in sphere of Civil Aviation",

Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”

Accident investigation The National Bureau of Air Accidents Investigation of Ukraine

“Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated 19/05/2011, Decree of Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 228 dated 21 March 2012 “The Statute of the National Bureau of Air Accidents Investigation of Ukraine”.

Although Single European Sky (SES) is not applicable to Ukraine (see also Chapter 2), ANSP certification is carried out in accordance with “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers Certification” approved by the order of the MoT № 42 dated 22/01/2007 (with amendments for requirements to ANSPs that provide MET services (order of MoI N575 dated on 28.11.2011) that was developed in line with the EC Regulation 1035/2011.

Website of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (MoTC): http://www.mtu.gov.ua (in Ukrainian language).


Website ofState Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU): www.avia.gov.ua (in Ukrainian, Russian languages).

Website of Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE): http://www.uksatse.ua/ (in Ukrainian, Russian and English languages).

1.2.1.2 State Aviation Administration of Ukraine

The Regulatory Body in the field of Civil Aviation in Ukraine is the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU), established by the Decree of the President of Ukraine No 398/2011 dated 06/04/2011. The activity of SAAU in sphere of Civil Aviation is regulated by the Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 520 dated 08 November 2014.

It is a separate and independent regulatory body. It is institutionally separated from the ANSP.

The SAAU is composed of civil representatives only, but appropriate Military Authorities (MoD) are involved in the airspace planning process in accordance with the "Regulation on Airspace Utilisation of Ukraine". The SAAU is responsible for the provision of effective functioning of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System of Ukraine.

Annual Report published: Y The SAAU Annual Safety Report for 2014 was published in April 2015.

SAAU structure - Annex B (1).

1.2.2 UkSATSE

Name of the ANSP: Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE)

Governance: State Enterprise Ownership: Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 24.12.2014 ref. AA №015106according to national legislation

ATC approach Y See comment above.

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y See comments above.

AIS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 24.12.2014according to national legislation.

CNS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 24.12.2014according to national legislation.

MET Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE on 24.12.2014for en-route/flight region meteorological service. Meteorological service at airports is provided by the State Hydro - meteorologicalService of Ministry of Emergency Situations.

ATCO training Y Training and Certification Centre of UkSATSE provides:initial training; unit training; continuation training (conversion training, training for unusual circumstances and emergencies, refresher training, language training); development training.

Others Y Flight Calibration Service.

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y 1. Part of the airspace of the Black Sea for which the provision of ATS is delegated to Ukraine according to international agreements. 2. In order to facilitate Approach Control Services for Uzhhorod Airport located close to the State Border, Air traffic services are delegated to Uzhhorod APP within part of airspace (Prohibited Area) of the Slovak Republic.


Annual Report published: Y Ukrainian State Air Traffic Services Enterprise Annual Report 2013 (published in March 2014)

UkSATSE structure - Annex B (2).

1.2.2.1 ATC system in use

Location Supplier and Product

Scope Type Put in Ops

Systems and procedures for air traffic services, in particular flight data processing systems, surveillance data processing systems and human-machine interface systems

Lviv Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Kseniya”

ACC, APP, TWR 2001

Lviv, (replacement)

Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Roksolana”

ACC, APP, TWR MAR2015

Odesa Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Anastasiya-II”

ACC, APP, TWR 2003

Odesa, (replacement)

INDRA, Spain, “AIRCON 2100”

ACC, APP, TWR DEC2015

Kiev SELEX, Italy, “Strela – Alenia”

ACC, APP & TWR FEB2012


Kiev ALES, Chez Republic, “Letvis”

ACC, APP (Back-Up) OCT2012

Dnipropetrovs’k INDRA, Spain, “AIRCON 2000”

ACC, APP, TWR 2008

Dnipropetrovs’k, (upgrading to provide back-up facilities)

INDRA, Spain, “AIRCON 2100”

ACC, APP, TWR FEB 2014

Kharkiv INDRA, Spain, “AIRCON 2100”

APP, TWR AUG2013

Zaporizhzhya Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Irina”

TWR 2006


1.2.2.2 ATC units of UkSATSE

The following table lists the ACCs and APPs (with associated FIRs) in the Ukrainian ATS airspace, including the airspace where the provision of ATS is delegated to Ukraine.

ATC Unit Number of sectors

Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route

TMA

Kyiv ACC 7 5 UKBV Kyiv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within Kyiv FIR

Odesa ACC 5 2 UKOV Odesa FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within Odesa FIR

L’viv ACC 4 1 UKLV L’viv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within L’viv FIR

Dnipropetrovs’k ACC 6 1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within south-west of Dnipropetrovs’k FIR, from FL265 to UNL north and south-east part of Dnipropetrovs’k FIR from FL265 to UNL

Kharkiv APP 3 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND-FL265

within TMA

Ivano-Frankivs’k APP+TWR

1 UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service

Uzhhorod APP+TWR 1 UKLV L’viv FIR APP+PAR+TWR service

Zaporizhzhia APP+TWR

1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Chernivtsi TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service

Dnipropetrovs’k TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service

Kharkiv TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service

KryvyiRih TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Kyiv/Boryspil’ TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service

Kyiv/Zhuliany TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service

L’viv TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR TWR service

Kherson X UKOV Odesa FIR TWR service

Mykolaiv TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR APP+TWR service

Odesa TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR TWR service

Rivne TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service

Vinnytsia/Gavrishivka TWR

X UKBV Kyiv FIR APP+TWR service

Kirovohrad TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Poltava TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Sumy TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service


1.2.2.3 Air traffic control service

4 ACCs (Kyiv, L’viv, Odesa and Dnipropetrovs’k) provide area and approach control services, flight information and alerting services within CTAs. 4APPs (Kharkiv, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Zaporizhzhia and Uzhhorod) provide approach control service within TMAs. 18 TWRs provide aerodrome control service in civil aerodromes Chernivtsi, Dnipropetrovs’k, Uzhhorod, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Kharkiv, Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Kyiv (Zhuliany), L’viv, Poltava, Kherson, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Rivne, Sumy, Vinnytsia and Zaporizhzhia and within its CTRs.

1.2.2.4 Flight Information service

Flight information sectors of ACCs/APPs provide flight information service within FIRs. Flight information service (FIS) is provided:

within controlled airspace (class C, D) – by ATC units (ACCs/APPs/TWRs); outside controlled airspace (class G, GND-1500 AMSL) - by 6 flight information sectors which are

in 4 ACCs (Kyiv – 2 sectors, L’viv – 2 sectors, Odesa – 1 sector, Dnipropetrovs’k – 1 sector) and by 1 sector situated in Kharkiv APP .

1.2.2.5 Aerodrome flight information service

4 AFIS units provide flight information service in AFIS aerodromes: Zhytomyr (Ozerne), Ternopil’, Kaniv (Pekari) and Cherkasy.

1.2.2.6 Alerting Service

All ATS units are responsible to provide alerting service within its area of responsibility according to Ukrainian legislation. ACCs serve as the central point for collecting all information relevant to a state of emergency of an aircraft operating within the flight information region or control area concerned and for forwarding such information to appropriate regional Search and Rescue Co-ordination Centers of the Ministry of Emergencies of Ukraine that are situated in each ACC. In case of emergency in civil aerodromes concerned TWR informs appropriate service set up within the framework of the search and rescue units and other services and units specified in the related coordination instructions. To collect and share ATS messages, there are:

11 Air Traffic Service Reporting Offices (AROs) at airports: Chernivtsi, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Rivne, Sumy, Uzhhorod, Vinnytsia and Zaporizhzhia;

6 AROs, which belong to briefing offices: Dnipropetrovs’k, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Kyiv (Zhuliany), L’viv, Odesa, and Kharkiv.

1.2.3 Airports

1.2.3.1 General information

The airport network in Ukraine comprises 28 certified aerodromes of which 19 have international checkpoints.

Kyiv Boryspil International Airport, the only airport covered in this LSSIP edition, is the main international airport in Ukraine and accounts for over 45% of all IFR operations at Ukrainian airports/aerodromes.


Aerodromes Odesa, Kyiv Zhuliany, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs’k, and L’viv are strategic. Other aerodromes are domestic. In accordance with international standards, the service zone of strategic aerodromes is within 200-250km.

The airport covered in this LSSIP is Kiev Boryspil International Airport.

1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, ITY-ADQ and SAF11 and INF07.

In addition to the Annex B of the ESSIP Plan edition 2014, it is up to the individual State to decide which

additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.

The airport covered in this LSSIP is Kiev Boryspil International Airport.

1.2.4 Military Authorities

The Military Authorities (the Ministry of Defence) in Ukraine are composed of:

- The General Staff; - The Armed Forces (Air Force, Ground Force and Naval).

The main responsibilities of the Air Force are:

- Air defence of airspace of Ukraine; - Monitoring of airspace usage; - Air Traffic Control within unclassified airspace (Within a special OAT route system (corridors),

TSA, TRA, R, D-zone, CTR and TMA of military aerodromes).

Air traffic control to OAT is ensured by a network of controlling military units that are responsible for providing services to OAT, planning and co-ordination the use of airspace with respective bodies of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System of Ukraine.

The controlling military units are a part of a common combat system of operation of the Armed Forces.

The controlling military units are provided OAT services in accordance with specific rules and procedures.

They report to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

1.2.4.1 Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N/A

Level of such legal provision: Ministerial Decree, Air Force Regulation

Level of such legal provision :N/A

Authority signing such legal provision: Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force

Authority signing such legal provision :N/A

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A

OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination N/A

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N/A

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N/A

ANSP Certification N/A ANSP Certification N/A

ANSP Supervision N/A ANSP Supervision N/A

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N/A

Aircrew Licensing Y


Oversight

1.2.4.2 Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N/A If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate:

N/A

Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

N/A

Additional Information:

1.2.4.3 User role

Additional Information: OAT provided by Military ATC units

Additional Information: Military ATC units do not provide services to GAT

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP N/A

National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N/A

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A

Other: N Other: N/A

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: Ministry of Defence NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A

Additional information: Additional information: GAT is provided by respective ATS units (ACCs) of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System.

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route Y En-Route N

Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA N

Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND N

AIS Y AIS N

MET Y MET N

SAR Y SAR N

TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N

Other: N Other: N

Additional Information: Additional Information:

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Within specific corridors only Y

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service


1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Remark:FUA requirements at the Levels 2 and 3are implemented by the military in the framework of the Integrated civil-military ATM system of Ukraine.

1.3 Air navigation services

1.3.1 Current Situation

Due to the current situation in the Eastern part of Ukraine and Autonomous Republic of Crimea (ARC), there was an urgent need to introduce changes/reconfigurations (see Fig 4, 5) of the Ukrainian air traffic management (ATM) system and to the air navigation services (ANS) provided by UkSATSE. Those ATM/ANS changes concerned both the Ukrainian national airspace and the airspace over the High Seas, where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements (hereinafter - airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine).

Those changes/reconfigurations were aimed at ensuring safe and continuous provision of air navigation services in the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine.

The airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine is that within the boundaries of the Flight Information Regions (FIRs) and Upper Flight Information Region (UIR) in accordance with the basic principles of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Ukraine provides air traffic services in the airspace over the High Seas on the basis of valid bilateral and multilateral agreements with the neighbouring countries, including the Russian Federation, based on the ICAO Council Decision of February 17, 1997 (No. EUR/NAT96/38-ATS).

The provision of air navigation services is safe at all levels and is based on the implementation of the concept of constant and continuous service provision with the use of appropriate policies, procedures and equipment, including mutual ATM Centres contingency and back-up.

The concept of ATM Centres contingency and back-up started in the early 2000s, particularly in Simferopol' FIR, based on studies of seismic processes of the Crimean Peninsula, and their possible impact on the infrastructure of UkSATSE that was located there and the associated service provision.

Ukraine has determined that the seismic situation of the Crimean Peninsula is the source of unacceptable risks for the provision of air traffic services in Simferopol' FIR in the absence of backing-up of Simferopol’ ATM Centre by other ATM Centres.

The schemes of the general seismic zoning of Ukraine for the seismic gap of 100 and 1000 years (based on studies conducted by the Subotin Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) and options of ATM Centres backing-up by other Centres (based on "Concept backing-up of ATC Centres of Ukraine", 2003) are given in Annex 1.The concept covered Ukrainian ACCs and auxiliary ACCsexisting at that time (in 2007 UkSATSE developed and established common contingency procedures for all its ATC units based on Amendment 42 to Annex 11 to Chicago Convention).

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF

CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Mode S ACAS Y

Others: Some transport state aircraft are approved for flight in RVSM airspace.

Military in <Ukraine> applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




This concept was taken as a base for developing contingency measures but also as a major input for the UkSATSE modernisation plan. Those measures were used during the capture of Simferopol’ Centre and facilities of communication, navigation and surveillance in Crimea. The contingency procedures applied comply with the provisions and principles of EUROCONTROL, general requirements for air navigation service providers in the European region and the requirements of Annex 11 of the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.

UkSATSE also developed a modernization plan based on the European ATM Master Plan and the EuropeanSingle Sky Implementation Plan (ESSIP) objectives. The planned modernisation steps will be performed according to Ukrainian Strategy of the Air Navigation system development for the years 2015-2025 that was elaboratedjointly by Ukraine and EUROCONTROL in framework of Project Management Plan (PMP) WP9 according to Agreement signed in 2009 between EUROCONTROL and SAA of Ukraine with the main goal of establishing a single ATM Centre.Prior to 2014, UkSATSE already had plans for the modernization of ATC Systems in all ATM Centres (ACCs) including reorganisation of air navigation services within Simferopol’ FIR. Those plans immediately were implemented during the Spring 2014.

Due to existence of the modernisation plan, UkSATSE was in the position to transferthe area control service fromSimferopol’ ACC to Odessa and Dnipropetrovs’k ACCs and, thus, to continue without any interruption in the safe air navigation services provision. The efficiency level of procedures, personnel and technical equipment operation, necessary for the provision of air navigation services, remained unchanged.

In order to fulfil the safety and security-related requirements concerning the conflict zones,Ukraine implemented additional measures, particularly setting airspace restrictions and prohibitions within various portions of the Ukrainian airspace.

Ukraine confirms its firm support, commitment and adherence to the principles of the Convention on International Civil Aviation by ensuring the safe operations within the airspace under responsibility of Ukraine.

Fig.4 Transfer of area control service of Simferopol’ ACC to Odessa and Dnipropetrovs’k ACCs


Fig.5 ATS sectors over the High Seas after transfer ofarea control service fromSimferopol’ ACC to Odessa and Dnipropetrovs’k ACCs

1.3.2 Air Traffic Flows above FL 275

After the transition to the new configuration of services, as a result of the crisis situation, the distribution of air traffic flows changed significantly during the year 2014.

The Figures 6-10 below reflect the changes of the air traffic flows and the traffic decrease.


Fig.6 1977 IFR GAT flights, serviced in Ukraine FIR August 02, 2013

Fig.7 790 IFR GAT flights, serviced in Ukraine FIR August 01, 2014 (-60%)


Fig.8 Number of IFR GAT flights, serviced in Ukraine FIR in 2014 (per month)

The current air traffic flows above FL 275 are depicted in the pictures below. The traffic flows vary depending on the day of the week and/or the season.

Fig.9 Air Traffic Flows above FL 275 during DEC 19-20 2014 taking into account the established Ukrainian airspace prohibitions and restrictions.


Fig.10 Air Traffic Flows above FL 275 during FEB 27-28 2015 taking into account the established Ukrainian airspace prohibitions and restrictions.

1.3.3 The conflict zones

In accordance with ICAO State letter № SMM 1/4-15/16 dated 20.03.2015 Ukraine submitted information regarding the conflict zones to ICAO (see fig 3).

“There are two portions of airspace within Ukrainian sovereign territory that could be considered as conflict zones in accordance with ‘conflict zone’ description laid down in the para 1.1. of the Interim procedure:

- temporary restricted area (SFC-UNL) is established over the conflict zone, including buffer zone in horizontal plane, within Dnipropetrovs’k FIR and UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-North by the decision of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine according to the request of the Air force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in order to provide flight safety for civil aircraft and to prevent operations of civil aircraft. The series of corresponding NOTAMs have been published since July 2014. The last NOTAM A0427/15 is dated 3rd March 2015 (attached);

- prohibited area UK-P35 (SFC-UNL) and the relevant buffer zone UK-P35Z (SFC-UNL) are

established within Simferopol’ FIR, UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-South and UTA Odesa-South over the temporary occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea by the decision of the State Aviation Administration in coordination with the General Headquarters of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Flights are not allowed within this area. Complete information regarding UK-P35 and UK-P35Z is published in AIP of Ukraine, ENR 5.1-4 and ENR 5.1-5 (attached).

There are no other risks to civil aviation in other parts of Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements.”.


Fig.11 Temporary restricted area in the eastern part of Ukraine and UK-P35Z over temporary occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea

1.3.4 Safety Case

Safety Case regarding provision of air navigation services within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements.

Ukraine in collaboration with EUROCONTROL developed the draft “Safety Case regarding provision of air navigation services within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for ATS is delegated to Ukraine by international agreements” (hereafter - Safety Case) in response to the necessity to make changes in air navigation services provision by Ukrainian State Air Traffic Services Enterprise (hereinafter referred to as UkSATSE) within Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the High Seas where the responsibility for air traffic services (ATS) provision is delegated to Ukraine by regional air navigation agreement approved by ICAO Council.

The main changes described in this document are related to the new configuration of services within Simferopol’ FIR resulting from the crisis situation in parts of the Ukrainian airspace.

The aim of this document is to provide evidence supporting the statements that the declared types of air navigation services within the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine are and will be provided at acceptable safety levels.

Moreover, this Safety Case supports Aircraft Operator’s decision-making process for the operations within the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine.

The document highlights UkSATSE’s capabilities to provide safe air navigation services in the airspace of Ukraine and airspace over the High Seas under responsibility of Ukraine:

– Ukraine continues to ensure full compliance with international and national requirements imposed on ANS providers and services specified in the certificates issued by State Aviation Administration of Ukraine and independent organisations and confirmed by the results of ICAO audit within USOAP/CMA program;

– Ukraine and UkSATSE successfully interact with national governmental bodies and co-operate with all parties involved at organizational, technical and procedural levels.


– UkSATSE has fully safe, efficient and state-of-art infrastructure,operational procedures,civil-military coordination andairspace management, aeronautical information management, search and rescue and other components responding to all European requirements;

– UkSATSEhas sufficient and adequately trained personnel;

– UkSATSE has efficient and proven contingency procedures which correspond to recommendations of the international aviation organizations;

– UkSATSE developed additional measures for the provision of safe services under actual conditions to gradually restart the utilisation of the ATS route network over the High Seas;

The document was developed with consideration of the ICAO proposals moved forward within the framework of coordination meeting of representatives of ICAO, IATA, FAA, EUROCONTROL and Ukraine held in Montreal (Canada) on January 31, 2015. Those proposals can be summarised as follows:

In order to minimize the effect of the identified hazards Ukraine is going to use a staged/phased approach to determine the airspace available for planning of civil aircraft flights over the High Seas.

Only the following ATS route segments over the High Seas will be initially allowed for flight planning for the Phase 1a:

M860 KUGOS – DIGAM between FL330-660; L851 KUGOS – ADINA between FL330-660; M854 SUMOL – RASIL between FL290-320; M856 RAKUR – DIGAM between FL290-320;

under the following conditions:

provision of longitudinal separation in accordance with the most recent updates of the Letters of Agreement between Odesa ACC and Bucharest ACC and Ankara ACC, respectively;

change of flight level, speed and radar vectoring shall not be allowed, except when required for tactical or emergency purposes and for provision of separation;

notification of aircraft operators by issuing the corresponding Ukrainian NOTAM about the unavailability of the corresponding route segments in case of military activity which is of potential hazard to civil aviation even if such military activities are performed below the listed ATS routes;

publishing NOTAMs based on information issued by ICAO, EUROCONTROL, other international organizations, other States about unavailable airspace and associated ATS route segments in case of conducting military activity potentially hazardous to civil aviation;

full provision of air traffic control services within the determined area over the High Seas by Odesa ACC with full VHF, radar and other infrastructure available;

introduction of the corresponding changes to the LoA between Odesa ACC and Ankara ACC, Odesa ACC and Bucharest ACC concerning provision of the above-mentioned conditions;

EUROCONTROL/Network Manager ensures flight plans check and distribution based on the availability of the four ATS routes as described above.

It is considered that the availability of the four ATS routes in the western part of the airspace over the High Seas is not at all influencedby the hazards connected with Russian Federation activity as there are no common boundaries and coordination points between Odesa ACC and ATS units of the Russian Federation for those ATS routes, no incidents of any nature have been detected or reported within above mentioned airspace since March 2014 and, currently, a reasonably high number of flights continues to operate on those routes:

Phase І.b. Opening the utilisation of additional routes (М861 RAKUR - ROMOK – BIRMA, М435 LAROM – RASIL) in the western part of the airspace over the High Seas within UTA Odesa-South.

All the other existing ATS routes within Simferopol’ FIR, UTA Odesa-South and UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-


South over the High Seas will be unavailable for flight planning.

Stage ІІ: Deployment of the whole ATS route network in the western part and eastern part of the airspace over the High Seas within UTA Odesa-South and UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-South, for flight planning and operations of civil aircraft (in addition to the first stage).

Stage ІІІ: Opening of the whole airspace within Simferopol’ FIR, UTA Odesa-South and UTA Dnipropetrovs’k-South for flight planning and operations of civil aircraft.

The risk assessment procedure shows that the identified risks are acceptable.

Finally, the document contains the main conclusion that UkSATSE does not have any technical and procedural problems for service provision in the airspace under the responsibility of Ukraine.

Consultation process with airlines and ICAO related to the Safety Case issues is ongoing.

Fig.12 Available ATS routes within the determined area over the High Seas (Phase І.а)


Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity

2.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine

0

100.000

200.000

300.000

400.000

500.000

600.000

2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F

IFR

flig

hts

Ukraine - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast

International Dep/Arr

30%

Domestic flights 6%

Overflights 64%

Ukraine - Distribution (Ref. year 2013)

A = ActualF = Forecast

2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F

H -31.8% 2.5% 8.5% 8.3% 7.9% 8.0% 7.7%

B 5.5% 2.9% 6.0% -32.1% -0.1% 5.9% 6.2% 5.8% 6.2% 6.0%

L -32.4% -2.7% 3.3% 4.3% 4.4% 4.1% 3.7%

ESRA08 B 3.1% -2.4% -1.1% 1.8% 2.4% 2.8% 2.3% 2.3% 2.8% 3.1%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2014)IFR flights yearly growth

Ukraine

2014

Traffic in the Ukraine decreased by 44.4% during summer 2014 (May to October inclusive), when compared to summer 2013.

2015-2019

The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 2.7% and 7.0% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 4.8%.


2.2 DNIPROPETROVSK ACC

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 527 577 703 645 476

Summer Traffic 443 488 522 540 200

Yearly Traffic 382 422 446 467 294

Summer Traffic Forecast 203 211 223 235 248

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 205 219 236 255 273

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 202 206 214 221 230

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

En

rout

e D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

UKDVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014

2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance

Traffic Evolution 2014 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity

gap Ref value Actual

-63.0 % 54 (+10%) 0.29 0.00 No

Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.

Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments

Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives No

Implementation of FCM01 is partially implemented; the implementation of CPRs was temporally postponed (since April 2014) and then it was resumed. The related ATM system adjustments are in progress. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)

ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No

Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014

Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes

Maximum configuration: 4 sectors No

The area of responsibility of Dnipropetrovsk ACC was changed which lead to change of maximum configuration (6 sectors)

Summer 2014 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 54, 10% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 28 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 24.

2.2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 – Summer

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.


2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.010.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesUKDVCTA

AnnualSummer

H 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0%

Ref. 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0%

L 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0%

Open 54 0% 55 2% 56 2% 58 4% 62 7%

C/R 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0% 54 0%

UKDV 54

Capacity Profiles

ACC2014

baseline Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Capacity Plan

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Free Route Airspace

Free Route Airspace

Implementation (FRAU

Ukraine, Scenarios

1A/1B – Night operations)

Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Scenario 2A – Day operations)

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

Implementation of Advanced

Airspace Management

(LSSIP AOM19)

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management

Implementation of enhanced tactical flow

management services (LSSIP

FCM01) and collaborative

flight planning (LSSIP FCM03)

Airspace Procedures

Staffing

Technical

Capacity Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development

Significant Events

Max sectors 6 6 6 6 6

Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Additional information


2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2015‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 54 54 54 54 54

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 54 55 56 58 62

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 54 54 54 54 54

Capacity Profile ‐ High 54 54 54 54 54

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 54 54 54 54 54

Capacity Baseline 49 54

2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 54 55 56 58 62

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70Cap

acity profile (movements per hour)

UKDVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook No capacity problems are foreseen for Dnipropetrovs’k ACC during the current planning cycle


2.3 KYIV ACC


2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 789 876 1099 1004 945

Summer Traffic 630 713 754 783 604

Yearly Traffic 549 626 650 666 586






0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

En

rout

e D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

UKBVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014




-22.8 % 73 (+1%) 0.12 0.00 No




Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives Yes

Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)



Maximum configuration: 7 sectors Yes


The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 73, 1% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 58 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 50.

2.3.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer


2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.010.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesUKBVCTA

SummerAnnual


H 73 0% 74 1% 76 3% 78 3% 81 4%

Ref. 73 0% 73 0% 74 1% 75 1% 76 1%

L 73 0% 73 0% 73 0% 73 0% 73 0%

Open 73 0% 73 0% 74 1% 76 3% 79 4%

C/R 73 0% 73 0% 74 1% 75 1% 76 1%

UKBV 73

ACC2014


2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Capacity Plan

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Free Route Airspace

Free Route Airspace


Ukraine, Scenarios





Airspace Management

(LSSIP AOM19)







Airspace Procedures

Staffing

Technical


Significant Events






2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019







2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 73 74 76 78 81

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90Cap


UKBVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook No capacity problems are foreseen for Kyiv ACC during the current planning cycle.


2.4 LVIV ACC


2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 644 721 757 796 697

Summer Traffic 514 546 554 574 379

Yearly Traffic 451 486 488 503 408






0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

En

rout

e D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

UKLVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014




-34.0 % 72 (0%) 0.00 0.00 No







Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 (operational FSAs and CPRs) will be possible after the commencement of operations from the new ATM system.

Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)

Installation of new ATM system

(training and transition periods – from August to November 2014) No

The commencement of operations from the new ATM system was shifted to March 2015

Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes


The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. The peak 1 hour demand was 45 flights, and the peak 3 hour demand was 40 flights.




2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.010.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

AnnualSummer

UKLVCTAEn-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values

H 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%

Ref. 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%

L 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%

Open 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%

C/R 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%

UKLV 72

Capacity Profiles

ACC2014


2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Capacity Plan

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Free Route Airspace

Free Route Airspace


Ukraine, Scenarios





Airspace Management

(LSSIP AOM19)







Airspace Procedures

Staffing

Technical Installation of

new ATM system


Significant Events






2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019







2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 72 72 72 72 72

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80Cap


UKLVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

2.5 ODESA ACC


2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 416 450 480 543 556

Summer Traffic 307 324 332 387 361

Yearly Traffic 250 266 272 302 294






0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

En

rout

e D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

UKOVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014

2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook No capacity problems are foreseen for Lviv ACC during the current planning cycle.





-6.9 % 61 (+3%) 0.00 0.00 No





Implementation of FCM01 is partially implemented; the implementation of CPRs was temporally postponed (since April 2014) and then it was resumed. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)



Maximum configuration: 3 sectors No

The area of responsibility of Odesa ACC was changed which lead to change of maximum configuration (5 sectors)


The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 61 in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 33 flights and the the peak 3 hour demand was 28 flights.



2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.010.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01Summer

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesUKOVCTA

Annual

H 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0%

Ref. 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0%

L 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0%

Open 65 7% 69 6% 74 7% 80 8% 84 5%

C/R 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0% 61 0%

UKOV 61

Capacity Profiles

ACC2014


2015 2016 2017 2018 2019


Capacity Plan

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Free Route Airspace

Free Route Airspace


Ukraine, Scenarios





Airspace Management

(LSSIP AOM19)







Airspace Procedures

Staffing

Technical


Significant Events






2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019







2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 65 69 74 80 84

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90Cap


UKOVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook No capacity problems are foreseen for Odesa ACC during the current planning cycle.


Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2013 applicable to Ukraine for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Reference number

Recommendation Ownership

REC-2013-1 (1)

Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

UA

State feedback: UkSATSE implementedFCM01 within Kyiv ACC.Odesa - FCM01 will be implemented after hardware (Entry Node) configuring by the producer

L’viv ACCs - FCM01 will be implemented after hardware (Entry Node) configuring by the producer and commencement of operations from the new ATM system.

Dnipropetrovsk ACC - FCM01 will be implemented after the modernization of the ATM system and after hardware (Entry Node) configuring by the producer.

Full FCM01 implementation will be finished by the end of 2015.

REC-2013-1 (2) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of SRC-RLMK to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

UA

State feedback: The 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ESARRs are fully implemented at the level of regulations. The second edition of "The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System" was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010). For ESARR 5, complementary national rules are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready by the end of 2015

REC-2013-1 (3) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of SRC-SLRD to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

UA

State feedback: The acceptable level of safety and process of its constant review are established by SAAU ("Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" dated 31/05/2010 N 320). The Air Code was approved by the Ukrainian Parliament with establishment of the main principles of Just Culture.

REC-2013-1 (4) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOP04.1 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

UA (UKBB)

State feedback: A contract has been signed to implement MLAT system and integrate it to the existing Kyiv ATC System to control surface movements. 2 SMRs will be installed and integrate into ATC System and A-SMGCS according to the implementation plan at UKBB

REC-2013-1 (8) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOP03 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

UA

State feedback: The SAA of Ukraine has issued the Rules for certification of Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N796 dated 25.10.2005) and Certification requirements for Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N201 dated 17.03.2006) which describes procedures of safety oversight as well. The appropriate actions will be reviewed in accordance with new addition of EAPRI (Version 2.0). The initial steps have been taken.

The SAA of Ukraine developed the new drafts of Ukrainian regulations in accordance with ICAO provisions. The process of approval of the Ukrainian regulations still continues.

Implementation of SMS and certification of aerodromes in accordance with Annex 14 will be done after approval process in due course.


Reference number

Recommendation Ownership

REC-2013-1 (13) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of COM10 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

UA

State feedback: The equipment for AMHS centers were delivered but situation in Ukraine caused UkSATSE to postpone the implementation of centers. UkSATSE try to find the financimg to complete the project.

REC-2013-4 Ensure better planning reliability at local level. All States

State feedback: At UkSATSE level there are:

-Regulation for LSSIP updating and executive process;

- Strategy Plan;

- Business Plan;

- Financing Plan;

- Investment Plan.

All above mentioned planes are linked with each other (using LSSIP objectives abbreviations).

National Strategy of Air Navigation System development for 2015 -2025 years was prepared and currently is under review and endorsement in the SAAU.

REC-2013-5 The ANSPs should ensure synchronised system evolution between neighbouring States.

All ECAC ANSPs

State feedback: UkSATSE will take into account the around situation, collect needed data from partners and initiate the meetings with neighbouring States to insure synchronised system evolution.


Chapter 4 - National Projects

The National projects currently ongoing in Ukraine are depicted in the table below.

Organisations Name Description Implementation Planning

EATM Links Status Performance Contribution1

UkSATSE (UA) ATC centres The upgrade of 4 ATC systems for L’viv ACC/APP/TWR, Kharkiv APP/TWR, Dnipropetrovsk ACC/APP/TWR, Odesa, ACC/APP/TWR consists on changing obsolete equipment to new one with extended functionality.

2010-2016 ESSIP: ATC02.2, ATC02.5, ATC02.6, ENV01, NAV03 OI-Steps: AOM-0601; AOM-0602; AOM-0701; CM-0801

Project is in progress ATC systems in Kyiv, Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovs’ have been implemented.. Planned dates for ATC systems upgrade completion: Lviv - 2015 Odesa - 2016

Safety and Capacity. The upgrade of ATC centres will allow to: - improve the reliability of ATM System operation by using modern computer and telecommunication technologies;- implement system functionality according to the EUROCONTROL and UkSATSE requirements to ATM System; - improve the capacity and air traffic safety in the area of UkSATSE's responsibility.

UkSATSE (UA)

BTN

Development (upgrade) of the fixed ground communication infrastructure of UkSATSE’s Backbone Telecommunication Network (BTN). The aim of development is to extend existing infrastructure (5 main nodes) to 23 regional units all over Ukraine.

2012-2016 ESSIP: COM09, COM10, COM11

Project is in progress. The Simferopol' main node was excluded from BTN structure.

Safety and Capacity Extension of BTN shall provide the possibility to exchange any type of ATC oriented information (data/voice) between any application within UkSATSE all over Ukraine.

Military Authority (UA), SAAU (UA), UkSATSE (UA)

FRA Ukraine Airspace Design WORKING PLAN

Edition Number: 1.0 Edition Date: 07.05.2013 Document approval by: Eurocontrol, Ministry of Defence of Ukraine, SAA of Ukraine and UkSATSE,

2017 ESSIP:AOM21 OI-Steps: AOM-0401: AOM-0402

Project is in progress. In accordance with FRA UKRAINE (FRAU) Airspace Design WORKING PLAN FRA implementation in Ukraine is planned to be implemented for 12/2017. The planning date of implementation the 1-step

Capacity: Increased through the better airspace utilisation. Safety: Some enhancement through reduction in controller workload. Environment: Reductions in emissions through use of more optimal routes. Cost-Efficiency: Savings in

1Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment – as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.


(scenario 1a) of FRA in Ukraine is 05 March 2015.

route distances as well as fuel efficiency through increased use of preferred flight profiles.

UkSATSE (UA)

Implement measures to prevent air/ground communications induced safety occurrences

The SAAU made assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of air/ground communication induced safety occurrences. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.

2015 SAF05 UkSATSE has been completed all measures as ANSP. NSA shall perform the introduction of regulation within 2015.

-

UkSATSE (UA)

Implement measures to reduce the risk of level bust occurrences

The SAAU made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of level bust and of the level bust toolkit and related material. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.

2015 ESSIP:SAF04 UkSATSE has completed all measures as ANSP. NSA shall perform the introduction of regulation within 2015.

-

UkSATSE (UA)

Light Gun implementation

Purchase of equipment to replace the old-fashion signalling guns by modern light projectors for ATC Towers (12 sites).

2015 - The project will start from the beginning of 2015.

Safety: Provide the alternative method of communication between pilot on the ground and ATC Tower in case of radio communication failure according to ICAO Annex 14 «AERODROME DESIGN AND OPERATIONS».

UkSATSE (UA)

Rationalisation of navigation infrastructure (Phase 2)

Phase 2: Installation and implementation of 7 DME/(D)VOR/DME in UkSATSE’s regional branches.

2014-2015 - Project is in progress. Safety: Improvement of flight safety and navigation infrastructure on the airspace of Ukraine.


UkSATSE (UA)

Registration facilities

Implementation of uniform video and audio registration and playback facilities in all ATC units of UkSATSE.

2015-2018 ESSIP:SAF10 It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated in 2016.

Safety: The goal of this project is to improve the reliability and objectivity of the recorded information about controllers actions during the ATC.

UkSATSE (UA)

SMR's installation.

Installation of 2 Surface Movement Radars (SMR) for Kyiv (Boryspil’).

2016-2018 ESSIP: AOP04.2 OI-Steps: AO-0102

Project is in progress.It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated by 2016.

Safety and Capacity: Implementation of SMRs will allow to improve the manoeuvring area awareness and to increase the responsiveness to ground situation changes in the absence of visual observation of all or part of the manoeuvring area due to: - providing radar monitoring of traffic on the manoeuvring area; - providing directional information to pilots and vehicle drivers as necessary; - providing advice and assistance for the safe and efficient movement of aircraft and vehicles on the manoeuvring area.

UkSATSE (UA)

SOFTWARE upgrade (ATIS)

Upgrading of software of ATIS systems in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches

2013-2016 - The project started at the end of 2013. It is expected that it will be finished in 2015 after implementation of the new national rules Of Met Service

Safety and Capacity: The upgrading of software will allow to increase the level of flight information service in TMA.

UkSATSE (UA)

SOFTWARE upgrade (VOLMET)

Upgrading of software of VOLMET in UkSATSEs Regional Branches

2013-2016 - The project started at the end of 2013. It is expected that it will be finished in 2015 after implementation of the new national rules Of Met Service

Safety and Capacity: The upgrading of software will allow to increase the level of flight information service.

UkSATSE (UA)

SOFTWARE TOOL

Procurement of instrument procedure design software tool to improve quality assurance in accordance with ICAO 9906 – “Quality Assurance Manual for Flight

2016-2017 ESSIP:NAV03 OI-Steps:AOM-0601; AOM-0602

Project will start at the beginning of 2016.

Safety and Cost-efficiency: Improvement of safety due to improvement in procedures design and cost effectiveness due to automation in the overall process.


Procedure Design."

UkSATSE (UA)

TOWER Construction of new 3 Towers at civil aerodromes of Ukraine: Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs'k and Kyiv (Boryspil’).

2010-2019 ESSIP:AOP03 OI-Steps: AO-0101

Project is in progress but time schedule reviewed. Kharkiv TWR is implemented.

Safety and Capacity: The construction of new Towers and procurement of new modular Tower will allow to re-equip them with new modern CNS aids in accordance with the EUROCONTROL requirements to TWR ATC units. The result of this activity will increase equipment reliability and maintainability and consequently – safety and capacity of air traffic

UkSATSE (UA)

USENET 5 nodes of USENET(surveillance data distribution network) are planned to be installed in UkSATSEs Regional Branches

2016-2018 - Project is in progress. Development of Technical Requirements is completed. It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated by 2016.

Safety, Capacity, Cost-efficiency: Network shall provide a single ground transport environment between any resources and users, who are a part of the Surveillance System of Ukraine (SSU), and also between them and other authorised civil and military stakeholders on the territory of Ukraine.

UkSATSE (UA)

VSAT Installation of new equipment in Dnipropetrovs’k, and Odesa for modernization and extension of satellite communication system VSAT.

2012-2016 - It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated soon.

VSAT equipment as a back-up means the provision of reliable voice communication between adjacent ACC of the Black Sea region States.


Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination

5.1 Cooperation

No cross-border FAB project is envisaged in Ukraine for the moment.

5.1.1.Adjacent ACCs/UACs

In order to achieve some of the ESSIP objectives, Ukrainian ACC(s) will have to co-ordinate actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs/UAC, as indicated in the CIP Status Report.

The LSSIP document will help foster regional co-ordination with neighbouring states by identifying mutually dependent actions.

Co-operation has been established with Belarus, Poland, Hungary, the Slovak Republic, Romania, Moldova, Bulgaria, Turkey and the Russian Federation concerning airspace structure, ATS route planning, co-ordination methods and ATM procedures.

5.1.2. Common Aviation Area Agreement

Ukraine is not a Member of the European Union and presently is not in the applicability area of the Single European Sky however, Ukraine has the intention to conclude a Common Aviation Area Agreement with the European Union. By Presidential Decree dated 19 October, 2007 № 891/2007 a mandate was given to a specially established Delegation to negotiate an ECAA Agreement with the EU. To assist the Delegation, the SAAU organised 4 working groups (economics, environment, safety and industry) to prepare a draft for such an agreement. The EC established 4 working groups with the same subjects as well. For this reporting period eight high level meetings and a number of working meetings were organised in order to draft a text of the Agreement. Initiation of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between Ukraine and EU and its member states took place in Vilnius on 28 of November 2013.

The aim of the Agreement is the gradual creation of a Common Aviation Area between the European Union, its Member States and Ukraine, which is founded in particular on identical rules in the areas of safety, security, air traffic management, environment, consumer protection, computer reservation systems, as well as with regard to social aspects. For this purpose the Agreement sets out the rules, technical requirements, administrative procedures, basic operational standards, implementing rules applicable between the Parties under the conditions set out also hereafter. The Common Aviation Area Agreement is based on free access to the air transportation market and equal conditions of competition.

The Agreement shall enter into force one month after the date of the last note in an exchange of diplomatic notes between the Parties confirming that all necessary procedures for entry into force of this Agreement have been completed. In the meantime, Ukraine is taking steps to harmonise its national legislation with the related EC Regulations and Directives.

5.1.3. Cooperation in the area of Satellite Based Augmentation Systems – EGNOS Extension in Ukraine

On 27 November 2013 the Joint Statement on cooperation in the area of Satellite Based Augmentation Systems – EGNOS Extension to Ukraine was signed between Government of Ukraine and European Commission. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) technologies, applications and services play a key role for economic and social development and industrial competitiveness in Ukraine and the European Union. Therefore, the Government of Ukraine and the European Commission decided to promote cooperation on GNSS applications and services. In this context, the Ukrainian Government and the European Commission have envisaged as a priority initiative to foster cooperation activities in the specific area of providing a satellite based augmentation service to Ukraine through the extension of the EGNOS system. Among these activities, two areas are mainly focused: research and development


program within the framework of Horizon 2020 EC program and further work on Institutional Agreement for the use of EGNOS in Ukraine with the support of GSA and Delegation of EU to Ukraine.

5.1.4. Project Management Plan for EUROCONTROL support

The Agreement for EUROCONTROL`s support to the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine has been signed on 22/10/2010 by DG of Eurocontrol and Chairman of SAAU.

The relevant Project Management Plan (PMP) was developed and approved on 30/06/2011.

The PMP includes the following working packages (WP):

WP0: Project Management - Completed (PMP V2.0 was signed by EUROCONTROL and Ukraine);

WP1:Assessment of the ATM/ANS regulations – Completed; WP2:Secondment of an SAAU expert to EUROCONTROL/DSS - in progress; WP3: Common development and production of a Strategic Business Plan in line with SIS

methodology: A 2-day courses were given by EUROCONTROL to Ukrainian UkSATSE and SAAU staff on 13-14 July and on 25-26 January 2012. A draft of Strategic Business Plan was developed.

WP4: Assessment of Service Provision - Completed; WP5: Assessment of civil-military component: Completed; WP6: Assessment of risks and their mitigation regarding fir’s borders with non-EUROCONTROL

MS airspace - Completed; WP7: Support in the development of a Ukrainian performance scheme - in progress; From

September to November 2012 two persons from UkSATSE were seconded to the PRU. They received training and elaborated draft of the RP1 Ukrainian Performance Plan. In a framework of deliverable D05b it is planned to develop Ukrainian Performance Plan for RP2.

WP8: Support during the establishment of the NSA –Completed. A 2-day course was given by EUROCONTROL to Ukrainian UkSATSE and SAAU staff on 25-26 January 2012.

WP9: The Agreement for EUROCONTROL`s support to the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine has been signed on 22/10/2010 by DG of Eurocontrol and Chairman of SAAU. The relevant Project Management Plan (PMP) was developed and approved .In the context of the “Agreement” EUROCONTROL will provide support to the Future ATM Development of Ukraine Project.WP9 investigated the feasibility of the Future ATM Development and the different tasks in WP9 will provide input to the feasibility study.

WP9 started on 1 January 2013 and each Task was completed. Deliverables such as a new operational concept, resectorisation options, cost benefit analysis, CNS considerations, a Safety assessment and Human Performance considerations including methods and know-how were concluded as follows:

Task 9.2 Preliminary Sectorisation Options. The deliverable (D10) with a revised proposal for sectorisation was delivered in September 2013, two months early. This task is closed.

Task 9.3 CNS Infrastructure Analysis: A CNS workshop was held in September 2013 where CNS issues were addressed. In March 2014 dedicated assistance was provided on the subject of surveillance, enabling the data sets prepared by UkSATSE to be made ready for simulation. Guidance and support, working methods and tools were provided to UkSATSE representatives. A further three days of dedicated support was provided by EUROCONTROL in May 2014 for surveillance coverage simulation. The proposed recommendations from this work will be considered by UkSATSE and included in the Feasibility report as required. In the next (planning) phase of the project in-depth work is required to develop a CNS strategy and deployment plan. Task 9.3 is closed for the feasibility phase.

Task 9.4 Human Performance considerations: An updated draft of Human Performance assessment method and subjects for consideration. This task is closed for the feasibility phase.

Task 9.5: Safety Assessment: The deliverable was distributed in January 2014. This task is considered closed.

Task 9.6: Business Case Development: EUROCONTROL delivered a toolkit to prepare a “business case straw-man” and a draft business case report in October 2013. Using the toolkit,


different scenarios can be built and costs and benefits compared to support decision making by executives. EUROCONTROL’s contribution to this task for the feasibility phase is closed.

Task 9.7: Operational Concept Definition: The final version was delivered to Ukraine in January 2014. This task is considered closed.

Knowledge was transferred to several UkSATSE representatives and options for more in-depth work made known for potential future developments. An internal UkSATSE feasibility analyses were expressed into National Strategy of air navigation system development for 2015 -2025 year. The National Strategy currently under review and endorsement process by SAA of Ukraine.

The Project Management Plan Version 4.0 was agreed and signed by EUROCONTROL and Ukraine in November 2014. The PMP V4.0 outlines the EUROCONTROL support until the end of 2017. According to the new version the EUROCONTROL will assist with:

development of a strategy for the migration from the current CNS structure which can be derived from CONOPs. EUROCONTROL will provide expertise, guidance material, best practices, assist with document structure and review;

assessment of the contribution of individual system components as described in the CONOPs to the overall business case;

development of a CONOPs validation plan. UkSATSE suggested to start this task with a quick assessment of the potential consequences of the current crisis in Ukraine on the CONOPs that was defined last year.

5.2 Regional cooperation

5.2.1 MoC between DHMI and UkSATSE

On 20th June 2012 the UkSATSE and DHMI have signed a Memorandum of Co-operation (MoC). This MoC should be evaluated in the context of and contributing to the regional co-operation in South-Eastern Europe and proposes actions to be taken by two Air Navigation Services Providers in order to enhance co-operation and co-ordination on ATM and CNS domains. There are two aspects at the MoC which define different cooperation lists:

1) Operational, consisting of:

- Harmonised ATM procedures and potential interface areas for improvements. - Airspace design and ATS route network. - Common operational activities. - ATC requirements for Flexible Use of Airspace.

2) Technical, consisting of:

- Technical activities in relation with the ATM systems. - Exchanging information and sharing experience on, equipment and technologies used. - Harmonising the procedures and training of technical staff.

The first bilateral meeting at operational level between representatives of DHMI and UkSATSE was held in Ankara, Turkey 6-7 November 2012.

During the meeting representatives of DHMI and UkSATSE discussed topics of common interest in terms of: harmonisation of ATM procedures in the interface of Turkish and Ukrainian airspace, development of the route network, improvement of co-ordination between technical staff, plans for development of the ATC systems and airports in Turkey etc.

The representatives of DHMI and UkSATSE also exchanged information concerning financial and economic issues.


5.2.2 UkSATSE- MoldATSA, UkSATSE - ROMATSA

Within the framework of regional cooperation development, UkSATSE concluded the agreement with the Moldavian Air Traffic Services Authority (MoldATSA) in 2010 on reciprocal exchange of Chisinau (Moldova) and Odesa (Ukraine) Mode S MSSRs data. In addition, UkSATSE and Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (ROMATSA) arrived at a joint decision to organize reciprocal exchange of Constantsa (Romania) and Odessa (Ukraine) Mode S MSSRs data to provide enhanced safety and efficiency of contingency planning on the regional basis and to ensure seamless and continuous services over the High Seas. It is expected that additional radar coverage will be provided.


Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation

Conventions

Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:

o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and

o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)

State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date

REG (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date

ASP (By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement

ASP. Progress (**)

ASP Impl. Date

MIL (By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement

MIL. Progress (**)

MIL Impl. Date

APO (By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

ECAC Completed No Plan

EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable

Multi-N Planned Missing Data

APT Late


AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

[IDP] Planned

Common principles, rules and procedures for OAT/GAT handling in a mixed environment are in place but not fully compliant with relevant EUROAT Specification. Harmonisation of OAT/GAT handling taking into account EUROAT is considered for further application.

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

The revision of existing Regulations and development of regulatory material for implementation of new principles, rules and procedures for OAT/GAT handling in a mixed environment that comprise EUROAT is in the process.

Planned

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

Common principles, rules and procedures for the OAT/GAT interface are applied but not fully compliant with EUROAT. Training competent ATS personnel to provide appropriate ATS to military is ongoing but not fully compliant with EUROAT as well. Harmonisation of OAT/GAT handling that comprises EUROAT is considered for further application.

Planned

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2018)

Common principles, rules and procedures for OAT/GAT handling in a mixed environment are in place. Harmonisation of OAT/GAT handling that comprises EUROAT is considered for further application. There is a special order of the MoD issued in 2011 to revise legislation concerning State Aviation in line with ECTL guidelines particularly.

Planned

31/12/2018

AOM19

Implement Advanced Airspace Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

[IDP]

Planned

FUA Level 1, 2 and 3 are all implemented. The implementation of the objective is expected to be completed in 2016.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

FUA Level 1, 2 and 3 are all implemented. The implementation of the objective is expected to be completed in 2016.

Planned

31/12/2016

AOM21

Implementation of Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

[IDP]

Planned

In accordance with FRA UKRAINE (FRAU) Airspace Design WORKING PLAN FRA implementation in Ukraine is planned to be implemented by 12/2017.

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2017)

In accordance with FRA UKRAINE (FRAU) Airspace Design WORKING PLAN FRA implementation in Ukraine is planned to be implemented for 12/2017. The planning date of implementation the 1‐step (scenario 1a) of FRA in Ukraine is 05 March 2015.

FRA Ukraine

Airspace Design

WORKING PLAN

Planned

31/12/2017


AOP03

Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013

[IDP]

Late

The SAA of Ukraine has issued the Rules for certification of Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N796 dated 25.10.2005) and Certification requirements for Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N201 dated 17.03.2006) which describes procedures of safety oversight as well. The appropriate actions will be reviewed in accordance with new addition of EAPRI (Version 2.0). The initial steps have been taken. The SAA of Ukraine developed the new drafts of Ukrainian regulations in accordance with ICAO provisions. The process of approval of the Ukrainian regulations still continues. Implementation of SMS and certification of aerodromes in accordance with Annex 14 will be done after approval process in due course.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2013)

The SAA of Ukraine has issued the Rules for certification of Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N796 dated 25.10.2005) and Certification requirements for Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N201 dated 17.03.2006) which describes procedures of safety oversight as well. The appropriate actions will be reviewed in accordance with new addition of EAPRI (Version 2.0). The initial steps have been taken. The SAA of Ukraine developed the new drafts of Ukrainian regulations in accordance with ICAO provisions. The process of approval of the Ukrainian regulations still continues. Implementation of SMS and certification of aerodromes in accordance with Annex 14 will be done after approval process in due course.

Late

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2013)

The recommendations of the Runway Safety Action Plan are implemented by UkSATSE.

TOWER Completed

31/08/2012

APO (By:12/2013)

Boryspil' Airport has established a local Runway Safety Team in February 2007 (Updated Order of the DG of Boryspil' Airport H‐01‐07‐260 dated 22‐06‐2010). Safety Management Systems (SMS) Implemented in accordance with ICAO provisions.

For the military, airport procedures for UKBB are published in local Instructions in accordance with ICAO provisions, used and agrreed by MIL. Mil participates in work of the local Runway Safety Team established by Boryspil Airport.

Completed

30/06/2013

AOP04.1

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011

Late

UKBB - KievMinistry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011)

31/12/2017

REG (By:12/2010)

Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011)

Late

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2011)

MLAT was installed as a source of SSR surveillance information for ATC System and A‐SMGCS. 2 SMRs will be installed and integrate into ATC System and A‐SMGCS according to the implementation plan

Late

30/07/2017

APO (By:12/2010)

Installation of required A‐SMGCS control function equipment compatible to the MLAT system

Late

31/12/2016


AOP04.2

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

Planned

UKBB - KievA contract has been signed to implement MLAT system and integrate it to the existing Kyiv ATC System to control surface movements. 2 SMRs will be installed and integrate into ATC System and A‐SMGCS according to the implementation plan at UKBB

30/07/2017

ASP (By:12/2017)

MLAT system was implemented and integrated into existing ATC System at Kyiv (Borispil') TWR. 2 SMRs will be installed and integrate into ATC System and A‐SMGCS according to the implementation plan at UKBB.

SMR's

installation.

Planned

30/07/2017

APO (By:12/2017)

Installation of required A‐SMGCS control function equipment to the Ground Vehicles compatible to t the MLAT system.

Planned

31/12/2016

AOP05

Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/01/2016

[IDP]

Planned

UKBB - KievThe updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H‐01‐07‐192 dated 02.03.2012 established the CDM Implementation Working Group. On the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A‐CDM. Existing implementation Plan is being updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan testing of A‐CDM components in UKBB was started in May 2012.

31/01/2016

ASP (By:01/2016)

The updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H‐01‐07‐260, dated 22.06.2010 established the CDM Implementation Working Group. On the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A‐CDM. Existing implementation Plan is updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan testing of A‐CDM in UKBB started in May 2012.

Partly Completed

31/01/2016

APO (By:01/2016)

On the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A‐CDM. Existing implementation Plan is being updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan testing of A‐CDM in KBP was started in May 2012. Updated Order of the DG of Boryspil' Airport H‐01‐07‐192 dated 02/03/2012, established the CDM Implementation Working Group.

Planned

31/01/2016

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013

Completed

All ACCs are using STCA Level 1 and Level 2. The SAA conducts Safety oversight of the changes in accordance with procedures that are fully compatible with EC Regulation 1034/2011 (order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" ‐ 320 dated 31/05/2010).

31/10/2013

ASP (By:01/2013) All ACCs are using STCA Level 1 and Level 2. ATC centres

Completed

31/10/2013

ATC02.5

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

Completed

All ACCs are using APW Level 1 and Level 2. Ukraine formal policy for APW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).

31/10/2013

ASP (By:12/2016)

APW function is implemented, documented and in operational use. The UkSATSE formal policy for APW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).

ATC centres

Completed

31/10/2013


ATC02.6

Implement ground based safety nets ‐Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

Completed

All ACCs are using MSAW Level 1 and Level 2. Ukraine formal policy for MSAW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).

31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2016)

MSAW function is implemented, documented and in operational use. The UkSATSE formal policy for MSAW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).

ATC centres

Completed

31/10/2013

ATC02.7

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

Completed

Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2 was implemented under Objective ATC02.6 31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2016)

Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2 was implemented under Objective ATC02.6

Completed

31/12/2013

ATC07.1

Implement arrival management tools Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

Completed

Initial arrival management tools are implemented in Kyiv ACC providing ATC for Kyiv TMA. Taking into account the arrival traffic density over the LSSIP timeframe the objective ATC07.1 is implemented for Kyiv TMA only.

31/03/2012

ASP (By:12/2015)

Initial arrival management tools are implemented in Kyiv ACC providing ATC for Kyiv TMA. Taking into account the arrival traffic density over the LSSIP timeframe the objective ATC07.1 is implemented for Kyiv TMA only.

Completed

31/03/2012

ATC12

Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

Planned

The MTCD and conformance monitoring functions were approved by SAA within ATC System certification process. Guidance for MTCD and MONA and associated operational procedures will be approved by SAA in 2016

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

Conflict detection and conformance monitoring tools have already implemented in all ACCs. Remaining actions will be implemented in 2016.

Planned

31/12/2016

ATC15

Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

[IDP]

Not Applicable

Taking into account the traffic demand and capacity shortage issues the AMAN functionality will be implemented within Kiev TMA only. Kiev ACC and Kiev TMA use the same FDP database in this way the access for common flight data including AMAN sequence available at any working position. However HMI improvement for Kiev ACC sectors in respect to exact fulfilment of the task objective will be analyzed during 2015 year.

‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

Taking into account the traffic demand and capacity shortage issues the AMAN functionality will be implemented within Kiev TMA only. Kiev ACC and Kiev TMA use the same FDP database in this way the access for common flight data including AMAN sequence available at any working position. However HMI improvement for Kiev ACC sectors in respect to exact fulfilment of the task objective will be analyzed during 2015 year

Not Applicable

‐


ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

Planned

Supervise compliance with regulatory provisions is planned to be done till 12/2015. A monitoring system of the performance of ACAS in the ATC environment is in place.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

Supervise compliance with regulatory provisions is planned to be done till 12/2015.

Planned

31/12/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)

A monitoring system of the performance of ACAS in the ATC environment is in place. The training plan and package approved. All concerned personnel are trained.

Completed

30/04/2012

MIL (By:12/2015)

Requirements of EASA do not applicable to the state aircraft. Equipment with ACAS IIEASA to the state aircrafts of Ukraine is not planed.

Not Applicable

‐

ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

[IDP]

No Plan

The new ESSIP objective currently under review to define the scope of applicability ‐

ASP (By:12/2018)

The new ESSIP objective currently under review to define the scope of applicability

No Plan

‐

COM09

Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2006 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014

[IDP]

Late

SAA has mandated UkSATSE to migrate to IP The SAA has approved planned means & dates of compliance of UkSATSE to migrate to IPv6 (COM09‐ASP01, COM09‐ASP03). IP connections between main ACC centres are underway. Mil units do not provide services to general air traffic.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2014)

IP connections between main ACC centres are underway. Development of the Plan for IP connections for outside Ukraine is in progress.

Mil units do not provide services to general air traffic. Migration to IP for the purposes of civil‐military coordination will be considered.

BTN

Late

31/12/2016

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014

Late

Implementation has started. Deployment UkSATSEs segment of ATS AMHS service by means of implementation of the central AMHS system in Kyiv branch of UkSATSE equipped with an AFTN gateway is progressing. Installation of AMHS MTA is foreseen in the Dnipropetrovs'k and L'viv branches. The military users will continue to be connected to the network by AFTN Gateway.

31/08/2016

ASP (By:12/2014)

Deployment UkSATSEs segment of ATS AMHS service by means of implementation of the central AMHS system in Kyiv branch of UkSATSE equipped with an AFTN gateway is progressing. Installation of AMHS MTA is foreseen in the Dnipropetrovs'k and L'viv branches.

BTN

Late

31/08/2016

COM11

Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

Planned

The implementation of VoIP on VCS of ATC centers is included into the draft ANS development Strategy for 2015 ‐ 2025

31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

UkSATSE has planned the implementation of VoIP on VCS of ATC centers and include this issue into the UkSATSE investment Plan for 2014‐2018

BTN Planned

31/12/2020


ENV01

Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013

[IDP]

Completed

UKBB - KievUkraine is outside of the applicability area. Ukraine implemented CDO technique for UKBB.

31/10/2013

ASP (By:12/2013) Ukraine implemented CDO technique within Kyiv CTA and TMA for UKBB. ATC centres

Completed

31/10/2013

APO (By:12/2013) UKBB takes part in relevant actions of CDO Implementation Plan

Completed

31/10/2013

ENV02

Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) atAirports Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

Not Applicable

UKBB - Kiev(Outside Applicability Area)

Ukraine is outside of the applicability area. ‐ ASP (By:12/2016) Ukraine is outside of the applicability area.

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016) Ukraine is outside of the applicability area.

Not Applicable

‐

FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006

Late

Ukraine fully joined EUROCONTROL in 2006. It is planned to implement ETFMS in all Ukrainian ACCs (ATC systems).

31/12/2015

ASP (By:07/2014)

It is planned to implement ETFMS in UkSATSE ATC systems of Dnipropetrovs'k, Kyiv, L'viv, and Odesa ACCs. Implementation will be executed after upgrading of ATC systems and installation of ETFMS Entry Node (EN) at Kyiv ACC. Standard Correlated Position Data from all Ukrainian ACCs will be provided to ETFMS via EN installed at Kyiv ACC.

Late

31/12/2015

FCM03

Implement collaborative flight planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

[IDP]

Late

All Ukrainian ATC systems provide flight plan message processing in ICAO format and automatically process FPLs derived from RPLs. UkSATSE plans to process flight plan messages in ADEXP format as soon as Objective COM10 and ATM system modernisation is completed.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2015)

All UkSATSE ATM systems provide flight plan message processing in ICAO format. UkSATSE plans to process flight plan messages in ADEXP format as soon as Objective COM10 and ATM systems modernisation is completed. The flight plan message processing in ADEXP format will be performed when objective COM10 is completed. The AFP message will be automatically provided by all ATC systems in ADEXP format according to systems installation/modernization schedule as follow: ‐Kiev ACC ‐ completed 02/2012, ‐Kharkiv APP, completed 08/2013, ‐Lviv ACC, replacement 05/2015, ‐Odesa ACC, partially completed 10/2012, ‐Dnipropetrovsk ACC, completed 02/2014. The operational flight plan message processing in ADEXP format will be performed when objective COM10 is completed.

Late

31/12/2016


FCM04

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

[IDP]

Not Applicable

Ukraine is outside of applicability area ‐ ASP (By:12/2015) Ukraine is outside of applicability area

Not Applicable

‐

FCM05

Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

[IDP]

No Plan

Implementation plan will be performed in 05/2015 31/12/2016 ASP (By:12/2016) Implementation plan will be performed in 05/2015

No Plan

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2016) Implementation plan will be performed in 05/2015

No Plan

31/12/2016

INF04

Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012

Completed

Integrated briefing is implemented in UkSATSE and at the following international airports: Kyiv (Boryspil'), L'viv, Kyiv (Zhuliany), Kharkiv, Donets'k, Dnipropetrovs'k, Odesa and Simferopol'. Military AIS is under responsibility of Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. There are no plans to apply any international practices/procedures/guidelines in AIS operations for the time being.

31/12/2007

ASP (By:12/2012)

Integrated briefing is implemented in UkSATSE and at the following international airports: Kyiv (Boryspil'), L'viv, Kyiv (Zhuliany), Kharkiv, Donets'k, Dnipropetrovs'k, Odesa and Simferopol'.

Completed

31/12/2007

INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018

Planned

Action will be provided through the activity of the Working Group onTOD Implementation, created under the authority of the State Aviation Administration

31/05/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

Action will be provided through the activity of the Working Group on TOD Implementation, created under the authority of the State Aviation Administration

Planned

31/05/2018

ASP (By:05/2018)

ANSP roadmap on TOD provision will be prepared within the framework of the activities of the Working Group on TOD Implementation, created under the authority of the State Aviation Administration and after national TOD policy and implementation programme establishment.

Planned

31/05/2018

APO (By:05/2018)

The roadmap on TOD provision will be prepared within the framework of the activities of the Working Group on TOD Implementation, created under the authority of the State Aviation Administration and after national TOD policy and implementation programme establishment.

Planned

31/05/2018

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft identification (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

Planned

Ukraine is outside of applicable area. However, there is an intention to implement the objective. 30/09/2019 ASP (By:01/2020) UkSATSE accept the implementation of the objective.

Planned

30/09/2019


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

Not Applicable

Ukraine is outside of applicable area (EU area) ‐ REG (By:06/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

Not Applicable

‐

ASP (By:06/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area.

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:06/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area (EU area)

Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

[IDP]

Not Applicable

Ukraine is outside of applicable area ‐ REG (By:02/2016) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

Not Applicable

‐

ASP (By:02/2016)

Ukraine is outside of applicable area. However, there is an intention to implement AGDL .

Not Applicable

31/12/2018

MIL (By:01/2014) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐AGVCS2

Implement air‐ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

Not Applicable

Ukraine is outside of applicable area ‐ REG (By:12/2018) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

Not Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2018) Ukraine is outside of applicable area.

Not Applicable

‐

MIL (By:12/2020) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2018) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

Late

The OLDI Standard version 2.3 (for basic coordination under objective ATC03.1) was implemented in all Ukrainian ATC systems). No impacts on safety, capacity and cost effectiveness are identified in comparison with OLDI Specification 4.2. NSA ensures oversight of all changes to Ukrainian ATS systems during its certification.

28/02/2016

ASP (By:02/2016)

The OLDI Standard version 2.3 (for basic coordination under objective ATC03.1) was implemented in all Ukrainian ATC systems. No impacts on safety, capacity and cost effectiveness are identified in comparison with OLDI Specification 4.2.

Late

28/02/2015

MIL (By:12/2012)

Coordination will be provided between Civil ATS Units and Ukraerocenter in framework of Integrated ATM Civil Military System

Late

28/02/2015


ITY‐FMTP

Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

[IDP]

Late

Transfer from OLDI to FMTP to exchange data between flight data processing systems. 31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

To perform migration from OLDI to FMTP to exchange information between flight data processing systems it is envisaged to upgrade the existing UkSATSE ATC systems and to use resources of both PENS and UkSATSE BTN, as a national part of PENS in order to create environment for data distribution by FMTP.

Late

31/08/2016

MIL (By:12/2014)

Military Units have ATC systems are not interoperable with current civil ATC Systems.

Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐SPI

Surveillance performance and interoperability (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

Planned

Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011) and certification requirements for ground‐based CNS facilities for civil aviation of Ukraine (Order N122 dated 25.05.2011) in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements.

30/06/2015

REG (By:02/2015)

Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011) and certification requirements for ground‐based CNS facilities for civil aviation of Ukraine (Order N122 dated 25.05.2011) in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements.

Late

30/06/2015

ASP (By:02/2015)

Procedures for the implementation of new ATS surveillance facilities include preparation of technical and operational requirements, safety assessment and staff training. UkSATSE upgraded all en‐route SSR in accordance with Ukrainian legislation, ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements regarding surveillance performance and interoperability.

Late

31/12/2015

MIL (By:06/2020)

Objective does not mandatory for Ukraine. There is no State Program for equipped MIL aircrafts and MIL ground Systems with Mode S

Not Applicable

‐

NAV03

Implementation of P‐RNAV Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012

Completed

The SAA has accredited a Lufthansa Systems AG (SAA Decision 28.03.2012) and an Aviation Accounting Centre Ltd (SAA Decision 22.02.2013) as Navigation database suppliers

31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2012)

RNAV 1 (P‐RNAV) departure and arrival procedures have been implemented

ATC centres /

SOFTWARE TOOL

Completed

31/12/2013

NAV10

Implement APV procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

[IDP]

Planned

A Plan for the implementation of APV is expected for approval by SAA. 31/12/2016 REG (By:04/2016) A Plan for the implementation of APV is expected for approval by SAA.

Planned

30/04/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

Introduction of APV procedures is a part of National PBN Implementation plan ‐Implementation of Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Ukraine strategy and roadmap 2013 ‐ 2025

Planned

31/12/2016


SAF10

Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011

Late

The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the reduction of airspace infringements. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2011)

The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the reduction of airspace infringements. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.

Late

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2011) The action plan approved by the DG of UkSATSE is implemented.

Registration

facilities

Completed

31/12/2013

MIL (By:12/2011)

There are some specific procedures in place but not fully compliant with ECTL DOC.

Not Applicable

‐

SAF11

Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018

No Plan

Objective is under review. ‐ REG (By:01/2018) Objective is under review

No Plan

‐

ASP (By:12/2014)

The ANSP related recommendations of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions were analyzed and assessed. On the base of the work performed it should be noted that part of the proposed recommendations, which would be relevant for UkSATSE, are already implemented within the UkSATSE‐s projects initiated before SAF 11 was approved. Some of recommendations were implemented as a practice which is used at the permanent basis.

No Plan

‐

APO (By:12/2014) Objective is under review

No Plan

‐

SRC‐RLMK

Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) Timescales: Entry into force of ESARR 3: 01/07/2000 Entry into force of ESARR 2: 01/11/2000 Entry into force of ESARR 4: 01/04/2001 Entry into force of ESARR 5: 01/04/2002 Entry into force of ESARR 6: 01/11/2003 Entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 550/2004: 20/04/2004 Entry into force of ESARR 1: 01/11/2004 Entry into force of Commission regulation (EC) No 1315/2007 repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011: 09/11/2007 Objective Implementation completion date: 31/12/2010

Late

The 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ESARRs are fully implemented at the level of regulations. The second edition of "The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System" was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010). For ESARR 5, complementary national rules are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready by the end of 2015

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2010)

The 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ESARRs are fully implemented at the level of regulations. The second edition of "The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System" was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010). For ESARR 5, complementary national rules are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready by the end of 2015.

Late

31/12/2015


SRC‐SLRD

Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies Timescales: Entry into force of ESARR1: 01/11/2004 Entry into force of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1315/2007 repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1034/2011: 09/11/2007 Objective Implementation completion date: 31/12/2010

Late

The acceptable level of safety and process of its constant review are established by SAA ("Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" dated 31/05/2010 N 320). The Air Code was approved by the Ukrainian Parliament with establishment of the main principles of Just Culture. It is expected implementation of the new Rules for aircraft accidents and incidents investigation. The list of occurrences to be reported and investigated was updated by the SAA in accordance with Air Code requirements.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2010)

The acceptable level of safety and process of its constant review are established by SAA ("Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" dated 31/05/2010 N 320). The Air Code was approved by the Ukrainian Parliament with establishment of the main principles of Just Culture.

Late

31/12/2015


Annexes

Annex A –Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Point for Ukraine UkSATSE Ruslan HUTSAN

LSSIP Focal Point for SAAU SAAU Alina ZADOROZHNIA

LSSIP Focal Point for MoD Ukrainian Air Force Command

LSSIP Focal Point for UkSATSE ANSP (UkSATSE) Serhii PEREVEZENTSEV

LSSIP Focal Point for Kyiv Boryspil Airport

Kyiv Boryspil Airport Mykola SAVOSTIANOV

LSSIP Contact Person for Ukraine EUROCONTROL Ana Paula FRANGOLHO

ESSIP Objective Implementation

ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI (E. REUBER till 02/2015)

A. DYBOWSKA REG- Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr GNATIUK (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI

A. DYBOWSKA ASP - Oleksandr GNATIUK (UkSATSE) MIL- Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

AOM21

R. BUCUROIU

A. DYBOWSKA REG- Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr GNATIUK (UkSATSE)

MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

AOP03

T. LICU

P. VRANJKOVIC REG -Gregoriy GOLODNYAK (SAA) AOP -Mykola SAVOSTIANOV(Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP- Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE)

AOP04.1

P. ADAMSON

P. VRANJKOVIC REG - Gregoriy GOLODNYAK (SAA) AOP -Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP -Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL –Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)

AOP04.2

P. ADAMSON

P. VRANJKOVIC REG - Gregoriy GOLODNYAK (SAA) AOP - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE)

AOP05

P. ADAMSON

P. VRANJKOVIC AOP - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)

ATC02.2

B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI

I. FEIJT REG – Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)

ATC02.5


I. FEIJT REG - Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE) MIL - PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD)

ATC02.6


I. FEIJT REG -Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)

ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI

I. FEIJT REG - Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP – Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)


ESSIP Objective



MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)

ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)

ATC12 P. TERZIOSKI

L. DELL’ORTO REG Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)

ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI

L. DELL’ORTO REG - Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP- Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)

ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI

L. DELL’ORTO REG- Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)

ATC17 S. MORTON

L. DELL’ORTO REG -Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Valerii BARANETSKYI (UkSATSE)

COM09

L. POPESCU

O. ALFARO REG- Roman LUKIIANCHUK ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU

A. KOKONA ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

COM11

L. POPESCU

A. KOKONA REG- Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

ENV01

C. FABER B. HILL APO – Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil

Airport) ASP - Vasyl LUHVISHCHYK (UkSATSE)

ENV02

S. MAHONY, A. WATT

B. HILL APO – Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport) ASP - Vasyl LUHVISHCHYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)

FCM01 H. KOOLEN

O. CIOARA ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

FCM03 S. SMIDT

O. CIOARA ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

FCM04

M. RICHARD

O. CIOARA REG - (SAAU) ASP Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

FCM05

P. MATERN

O. CIOARA REG - (SAAU) ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE) MIL – Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD) APO - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO ASP - Sergii Tkach (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)

INF07

A. PETROVSKY

A-P. FRANGOLHO REG – Oleksandr KAMASHAEV (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL – PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD) APO - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

ITY-ACID

A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU)

ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD)

ITY-ADQ

M. UNTERREINER

A-P. FRANGOLHO REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL – PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD) APO - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

ITY-AGDL

S. DISSING

A. KOKONA REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD)


ESSIP Objective



ITY-AGVCS2

J. POUZET

O. ALFARO REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD)

ITY-COTR S. MORTON

L. DELL’ORTO REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE)

ITY-FMTP

L. POPESCU

O. ALFARO REG – Vasiliy KAMASHAEV (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL – PavloLIEVTIEROV (MoD) APO - Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

ITY-SPI

M. BORELY, R. STEWART

O. CIOARA REG – Roman LUKIIANCHUK (SAAU) ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO (UkSATSE) MIL - Pavlo LIEVTIEROV (MoD)

NAV03

F. PAVLICEVIC

A. KOKONA REG - Alina ZADOROZHNIA (SAAU) ASP - Pavlo KUD` (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

NAV10

R. FARNWORTH

A. KOKONA REG –Oleksandr KAMASHAEV (SAAU) ASP - Pavlo KUD` (UkSATSE) MIL – Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD) APO -Mykola SAVOSTIANOV (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

SAF10

T. LICU

I. FEIJT REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU) ASP - Vitaliy BEZMAL (UkSATSE) (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

SAF11

S. LAWRENCE

I. FEIJT REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU) ASP - Vitaliy BEZMAL (UkSATSE) (UkSATSE) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

SRC-RLMK M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

SRC-SLRD M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU) MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)


Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation 1. The Structure of the SAAU (the main function areas)

Address of SAAU:

Peremogy Av. 14, Kyiv, 01135, Ukraine

Tel.: (+38 044) 351 54 01

Fax: (+38 044) 35156 92

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.avia.gov.ua

Chairman

Senior Deputy

Chairman

Deputy Chairman

Aerodromes and Airports Department

Air Navigation Directorate

Flight Coordination

Unit

International Cooperation

and European

Integration Department

Aircraft Type Certification Department

Aircraft Continuing Airworthi-

ness Department

Airworthiness Directorate

Sector for the documenta-

tion provision

Aviation Medici-

ne

Standardiza-tion, interna

audit and internationa

projects coordination

Unit

Risk Manage-

ment Unit

Flight Operations Department

Personnel Certification Department

Regional Inspections Department

Flight Operations Directorate

Sector of regulation of

the dangerous

cargo

Special Sector

Administrative Department

Personnel Department

Legal Unit

Aviation Security

Directorate

Financial and Economical Directorate

Sector for the

corruption prevention

and detection


2. The organisation chart ofUkSATSE:

UkSATSE comprises:

- The UkSATSE Head Office (Air Navigation, CNS, Administration, Economics and Finance, Engineering Departments) is locatedat airport Kyiv (Boryspil’);

- Six regional branches of UkSATSE (RB of UkSATSE) located at airports: Simferopol’, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Dnipropetrovs’k, L’viv, Odesa and Kharkiv .

- UkSATSE Flight Calibration Service: aircrafts performing calibration checks of navigation equipment for UkSATSE, as well as for other entities in neighbouring States;

- UKRAEROCENTRE: Ukrainian Airspace Management and Planning Centre – the Head Unit of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System (situated in RB of UkSATSE “Kyivcentraero”);

- AIS: Aeronautical Information Services of UkSATSE is located at airport Kyiv (Boryspil’); - TCC of UkSATSE: Training and Certification Centre of UkSATSE for air traffic controllers and

maintenance technicians (situated near UkSATSE Head office).

Address of UkSATSE Head office:

Airport, Boryspil’, Kyiv region, 08307, Ukraine

Telephone: (+38 044) 235 21 10

Fax: (+38 044) 281 84 84

AFTN: UKKRDUXX

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.uksatse.ua


3. The organisation chart ofAir Navigation Service Department of UkSATSE


Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations

ESRA EUROCONTROL Statistical Reference Area

IAIP Integrated Aeronautical Information Package

MoD Ministry of Defence of Ukraine

MoTC Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine

MoI Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine

RAIM Regional Aeronautical Information Management

SAAU State Aviation Administration of Ukraine

UKRAEROCENTER Ukrainian Airspace Management and Planning Centre

UkSATSE Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) UKRAINE ......LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine Released Issue...

Documents

Transcript of Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) UKRAINE ......LSSIP Year 2015-2019 Ukraine Released Issue...