Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) MONTENEGRO · 2019-02-18 · Montenegro is committed to...

Year 2015 - Level 1

EUROCONTROL

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) MONTENEGRO

LSSIP Year 2015 Montenegro Released Issue

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP for Montenegro

Infocentre Reference: 16/01/29-80

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015

LSSIP Year 2015 Montenegro Edition Date: 01/04/16

LSSIP Focal Point - Andrea Dukanac E-mail: [email protected]

CAA of

Montenegro

LSSIP Focal Point – Bojan Savnik E-mail: [email protected]

SMATSA

LSSIP Contact Person - Octavian Cioara E-mail: [email protected]

Unit DPS/PEPR

Status Intended for

Working Draft General Public

Draft Agency Stakeholders

Proposed Issue Restricted Audience

Released Issue

Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Montenegro (ME) - OC\Year_2015\Released\LSSIP Year 2015_ME_Released.docx

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material

2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2015 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

3 European ATM Portal Working - https://www.eatmportal.eu/working

Public - https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ 4 ESSIP Report 2014 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

5 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

6 Acronyms and abbreviations

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

8 AIP Serbia/ Montenegro http://www.smatsa.rs/AIS/Active/eAIP/start_page.html


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2015 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan – Edition 2015.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1

Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4

Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographical Scope ................................................................................................................. 5

1.1.1 International Membership ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) ................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ............................................................................ 6

1.2 National Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) .................................................................................................................. 7 1.2.2 SMATSA ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.3 Airports ................................................................................................................................. 9 1.2.4 Military Authorities ................................................................................................................ 9

Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................................................ 12

Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ........................................................................................ 13

Chapter 4 - National Projects ................................................................................................................. 14

Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ....................................................................................................... 20 5.1 Regional cooperation ............................................................................................................. 20

Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ........................................................................................ 22 6.1 Conventions ........................................................................................................................... 22 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress .......................................................................... 23

ANNEXES

LSSIP Year 2015 Montenegro 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

Montenegro is a member of ECAA, ICAO, ECAC and EUROCONTROL.

In the context of this document, there are two main stakeholders in Montenegro, Civil Aviation Agency (CAA) and Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc.

The CAA has the role of the NSA (National Supervisory Authority).

The Civil Aviation including the portion of ATS and CNS located on, and corresponding to the airspace over the territory of Montenegro and the territorial waters thereto is regulated and supervised by the Montenegro CAA.

SMATSA is a common service provider for the two states, Serbia and Montenegro.

Traffic and Capacity

Traffic in Serbia & Montenegro increased by 8.1% during Summer 2015 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2014. The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 1.7% and 5.2% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 3.5%.

ESSIP Objective Implementation

Having a common air navigation services provider Montenegro and Serbia have synchronised the planning for the implementation of the ESSIP objectives applicable to Montenegro.

Montenegro is committed to implement all applicable objectives by providing necessary legal framework, where applicable, and by coordinating the planning activities with SMATSA.

The content of the chapter on the implementation of ESSIP objectives, echoes to a large extent the information provided by SMATSA in the LSSIP of Serbia. Overall, there is a good level of implementation of the ESSIP Objectives. A substantial part of the technology related objectives are expected to be implemented in 2017/2018.

LSSIP 2015 - Montenegro * FOC Date

█ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

State-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

*

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management *

AOM21.1 Implementation of Direct Routing [PCP]

[E] *

AOM21.2 Implement Free Route Airspace [PCP]

[E] *

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions *

ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2

*

ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2

*

ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2

*

ATC12.1 Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring

*

ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations


LSSIP 2015 - Montenegro * FOC Date

█ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 *

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

*

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS *

COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

*

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services *

FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning *

FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1

FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [PCP]

[E] *

FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment [PCP]

[E] *

INF04 Implement integrated briefing *

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) *

ITY-ACID Aircraft identification

ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

*

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 *

ITY-AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195

*

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes

*

ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) *

ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability *

NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV

NAV10 Implement APV procedures *

SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

*

SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions *

Airport-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

LYPG-Podgorica Airport

AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1

AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2

AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

AOP10 Time Based Separation [PCP]

[E] AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan

[PCP] [E] *

AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring

[PCP] [E]

ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures

ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports


Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partly Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable (Montenegro does not participate in this obj.)

Late

E= Essential – Master Plan Reference PCP = Pilot Common Project

NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2015.

The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;

Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;

Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment

1.1 Geographical Scope

1.1.1 International Membership

Montenegro is a Member of the following international organisations and initiatives/ developments in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC 2008

EUROCONTROL 2007

European Union

EASA

ICAO 2007

NATO

ITU 2006

1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses the airspace over Montenegro land areas and territorial waters adjacent thereto, as illustrated on the picture below.


1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation

The Montenegrin airspace is generally divided into uncontrolled and controlled portions according to the By-law on airspace classes in Montenegro and the conditions for their use published in the Official Gazette of Montenegro No. 60/11.

ICAO classes C, D and G apply to Montenegrin airspace in the following manner:

a) Class C applies from 450m (1500 ft) above GND to FL 660, except for CTRs and ATZs.

b) Class D applies for all CTRs.

c) Class G applies from GND to 450m (1500 ft) above GND, except for CTRs and ATZs, and to the upper limit of ATZ in ATZs.

The Montenegrin airspace is sub-divided into:

a) en-route (FL145 – FL660) for which the responsibility rests upon ATCC Beograd,

b) two TMAs and CTRs for which the responsibility rests upon the Approach Offices located at the respective airports. The lower limits of all TMAs are 450m (1500ft) above GND while the upper limit is FL145.

1.2 National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Montenegro are the following:

Government of Montenegro

Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs

Montenegro CAA – Montenegro Civil Aviation Agency. The CAA has also a role of NSA – National Supervisory Authority.


Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.

Operations of ANSP are currently performed by SMATSA (Serbian and Montenegrin joint ANS provider).

1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)

1.2.1.1 General information

The different national entities having regulatory overseeing responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The CAA is further detailed in the following sections.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible

Legal Basis

Rule-making Parliament, Government, Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs and CAA

Aviation Act (“Official Gazette of Montenegro” No30/12)

Safety Oversight CAA Aviation Act (“Official Gazette of Montenegro” No30/12)

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

CAA Aviation Act (“Official Gazette of Montenegro” No30/12)

Airspace Government, Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs and CAA


Economic Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs and CAA


Environment Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs, Environment Protection Agency of Montenegro and CAA


Security Government, National Security Board and CAA



Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible

Legal Basis

Accident investigation National Commission for Aircraft Accidents and Serious Incidents Investigation


1.2.1.2 CAA

The Civil Aviation Agency of Montenegro is founded by the Government as a public agency (Article 5 of the Aviation Act, “Official Gazette of Montenegro” No30/12) and entrusted with the tasks of regulation, oversight, certification, licensing and record keeping in the civil aviation in Montenegro, as well as cooperating with the international aviation organizations.

Bodies of the CAA are the Council and the Executive Director. The Council, consisting of five members, manages the Agency. The CAA is headed by the Executive Director.

CAA is the NSA (National Supervisory Authority), and as such issues certificates and performs safety oversight over ANSPs.

As the ANS provision is separated from the Regulator, the CAA, apart from the above, is responsible for rule making, collection, analysis, keeping and distribution of occurrence reports; safety performance monitoring and other tasks defined in the transposed SES legislation.

The organisational chart of CAA is depicted in the Annex B of this document.

The Montenegro CAA web-site can be visited at www.caa.me

Annual Report published: Y The Annual Report covering 2015 activities is under preparation. The NSA Safety Oversight Annual Report for 2014 is available, on request, under ref. no. NSA-AREP-14-ME of March 31st 2015.

1.2.2 SMATSA

1.2.2.1 Services provided

Name of the ANSP: SMATSA – Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc

Governance: Two State Enterprise Ownership: Government of Serbia=92%; Government of Montenegro=8%

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Airport(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET Y

ATCO training Y

Others Y Flight Check and Calibration Service for NAVAIDs / COM / PANS-OPS

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y Bosnia and Herzegovina within the eastern portion of the upper airspace (FL325-FL660) of Sarajevo FIR; Serbia (within the entire controlled airspace)

SMATSA web address: www.smatsa.rs

The organisational chart of SMATSA is depicted in the Annex B to this document.

Annual Report published: Y http://www.smatsa.rs/Eng/ShowContent.aspx?mi=59 This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP.


1.2.2.2 ATC systems in use

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales

Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? major upgrade completed in 2011

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2019

ATC Unit Podgorica APP

SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales

Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? major upgrade completed in 2011

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2019

ATC Unit Podgorica APP

1.2.2.3 ATC units

The ATC units in the Montenegrin airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route TMA

- - - - ATC in the en-route portion is provided by Beograd ATCC.

Podgorica APP/TWR 1 Beograd FIR

1.2.3 Airports

1.2.3.1 General information

There are two international airports in Montenegro: Podgorica Airport and Tivat Airport, both owned by a public enterprise Airports of Montenegro, established by the Government of the Republic of Montenegro in 1999.

Airports of Montenegro web address: http://www.montenegroairports.com/

1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan – Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.

Therefore, Podgorica Airport (LYPG) is the only Montenegrin airport covered by the LSSIP Year 2015.

1.2.4 Military Authorities

The Military Aviation Authority in Montenegro is the Ministry of Defence.

Military units don’t have any particular role in ATS provision, but are involved in ASM planning processes and co-ordination, organisation and control of activities in TSAs. Military activities in Montenegro have no significant effect on the airspace users.

1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


1.2.4.1 Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule-making

Oversight

1.2.4.2 Service Provision role

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided: N/A

En-Route N SMATSA is providing service En-Route

Approach/TMA N SMATSA is providing service Approach/TMA

Airfield/TWR/GND N SMATSA is providing service Airfield/TWR/GND

AIS N SMATSA is providing service AIS

MET N SMATSA is providing service MET

SAR N RCC coordinates all SAR operations

SAR

TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS

Other: Other:

Additional Information: Additional Information:

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N/A

Level of such legal provision: Ministerial Decree, and Air Force Regulation (Standard Operational Procedures)

Level of such legal provision: N/A

Authority signing such legal provision: Minister of Defence

Authority signing such legal provision: N/A

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT N/A Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A

OAT/GAT Coordination Y OAT/GAT Coordination N/A

ATCO Training N/A ATCO Training N/A

ATCO Licensing N/A ATCO Licensing N/A

ANSP Certification N/A ANSP Certification N/A

ANSP Supervision N/A ANSP Supervision N/A

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N/A

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: - Additional Information: -

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP N/A

National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N/A

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A

Other: - Other: -

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: Ministry of Defence N/A

Additional information:


Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N/A If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate:

Certificate issued by: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

Additional Information:

1.2.4.3 User role

Currently there are no military aircraft in Montenegro that are certified for operations under instrument flight rules.

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only Y

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system N Under radar advisory service N

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements Y Exemption from Route Charges

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF

CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS

Others:

1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Military in Montenegro applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity

The information related to the en-route traffic and capacity can be found in the LSSIP of the Republic of Serbia.

Montenegro and Serbia have founded a common ANSP organisation (SMATSA – Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services Agency Ltd.) whose principal place of operations is in Belgrade, namely Beograd ATCC.


Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to Montenegro for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Reference

number Recommendation 2014 Ownership

REC-2014-2

Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01, AOP04.1, SAF10, INF04, NAV03, AOP03, ENV01, ITY-AGDL, ITY-ADQ, COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP and ITY-COTR, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

Local Stakeholders

Corrective actions taken:

Yes

Description:

AOP03 - ANSP has completed all SLOAs.

SAF10 - The implementation of FIS is postponed to 2018.

INF04 - The integration of AIS briefing and FPL was implemented in April 2013 through the installation of EAD Briefing Facility.

NAV03 - RNAV-1/RNP1 procedures in planned with PBN Concept Implementing Plan will be implemented in 2016.

COM10 - Completed all SLOAs except Extended ATSMHS functionalities which is expected in 2016.

ITY-ADQ - Expected for implementation by 12/2017

ITY-AGDL - Expected to be implemented by 12/2018, pending the clarification of the technical solution.


Chapter 4 - National Projects

The modernisation of ANS provision, referred to as FAMUS project, started in 2002. Project included the construction of a new ATCC building (Belgrade, Serbia) as well as the supply and installation of a new ATM system and other equipment. The first phase of the FAMUS project was finalized in May 2011. The second phase will have finished by May 2016.

Montenegro has introduced major legislative changes which started with the implementation of a set of SES Regulations and Directives transposed into national legislative system and published in Montenegrin in the Official Gazette of Montenegro in January 2011 and continued with the promulgation of the new Aviation Act (“Official Gazette of Montenegro” No30/12). In collaboration with ISIS programme, the CAA has developed an Action Plan for the promulgation of the necessary by-laws in accordance with the new Aviation Act and for the transposition of SES II Legislative Package and is currently introducing new legislative acts in accordance with that plan.

Montenegro plans to introduce PBN Concept which started in 2012 with the promulgation of the Roadmap for PBN implementation in Montenegro. Trial RNP 1 SIDs and STARs, as well as APCH procedures were published in the first half of 2015.

Montenegro intends to expand the accessibility of Tivat Airport to night operations for IFR commercial air traffic. Having started with a Feasibility Study, the Project continued in 2015 along the findings and recommendations of the study by implementing GNSS based instrument approach and departure procedures through the PBN concept.

The main projects currently ongoing in Montenegro or affecting Montenegrin airspace are depicted in the table below.

Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references

Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas *

SMATSA (ME) Air-Ground radio network enhancement

Implementation of contingency sites for Rudnik and Kopaonik radio sites, including land acquisition, facilities design and building, and equipment procurement.

2016-2018 Ongoing ESSIP:COM11 OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved through better R/T coverage and higher availability Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

AMHS Upgrade AIDA-NG system for new AMHS functionality: - AMC table import function, - Export statistics in AMC format.

By the end of 2016.

Ongoing ESSIP:COM10 OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Within the Extended ATSMHS, AMHS security services, when implemented, may help to protect against safety hazards such as accidental or deliberate message corruption and can provide protection against undetected misdelivery Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -




Beograd ATCC Air-Ground radio network system upgrade

Installation and Upgrade of VHF/UHF radios at Belgrade, Kopaonik, Rudnik and Podgorica locations

By December 2015

Completed ESSIP:COM11 OI-Steps: - Other: SESAR Enabler CTE-C5

Capacity: Improved through more frequency channels. Safety: Improved through better R/T coverage Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

CCAMS Centralised SSR Code Assignment and Management System (CCAMS).

By March 2015.

Completed ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: SESAR Enabler GSURV-0101

Capacity: Efficient management of SSR codes. Safety: Reduction of SSR code conflicts and code change. Retention of assigned SSR code within the CCAMS area. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Flexibility to match future demands.

CIMACT Civil Military ATM co-ordination tool - integration of civil and military air information

By the end of 2016.

Ongoing ESSIP:AOM19 OI-Steps: AOM-0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, DCB-0203 Other: -

Capacity: Increased through better utilisation of airspace resources Safety: Increased through better coordination between civil and military airspace needs Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -




CPDLC Controller Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC)

By the end of 2018.

Ongoing ESSIP:COM09, ITY-AGDL, ITY-COTR, ITY-FMTP OI-Steps: AUO-0301, CM-0201 Other: -

Capacity: Increased capacity through reduction of the controller workload and better usage of the available resources. Safety: CPDLC offers the potential to relieve some congestion, enhancing existing communications between the air and the ground, and offering unambiguous transmission of routine messages between controllers and pilots. In addition, shortcomings such as stuck microphones, blocking of frequencies or simultaneous transmissions are avoided, contributing to the overall safety of the ATC system. CPDLC reduces the pilot's and the air traffic controller's communication workload, allows them to concentrate on other essential tasks, and reduces of code conflicts and SSR code change. Increased safety through automation. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Increased controller productivity through the use of advanced tools.

Enhanced Mode-S

Upgrade TopSky-ATC system for enhanced Mode-S functionality.

By the end of 2017.

Planned ESSIP:ITY-ACID, ITY-SPI OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: Increased capacity through reduction of the controller workload and better usage of the available resources. Safety: Increased safety through automation. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Increased controller productivity through the use of advanced tools.

Fall-back ATM System

Operational Backup System to the SMATSA llc for providing a reduced set of ATMS functions and will consist of : - opera-tional (ONL) and - test (TST) configuration.

First phase by June 2016 Second Phase by Decembre 2016

Ongoing ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved through availability of providing ATS service after Main ONL System becomes failed. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -




Implementation of Voice and Data transfer over Internet Protocol (IP) in ATM

Technical personnel training in EUROCAE ED-137 & ED-138 standards. Transport network migration from TDM to IP. Belgrade ATCC VoIP Voice Communication System implementation in accordance with EUROCAE ED-137. upgrade to VoIP. Transport network migration from TDM to IP.

2015-2020 Ongoing ESSIP:COM11 OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: Allows more flexible dynamic sectorisation and allocation of resources Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Reduced costs through the use of standard hardware and of Internet off the shelf technologies

New radar station

New radar station building, along with the procurement of a new secondary radar system to be installed at the station.

2015-2018 Ongoing ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: Improved SSR coverage redundancy on lower altitudes in south-eastern parts of Serbian en-route airspace will lead to more optimal radar vectoring in those areas. Safety: Improved SSR coverage redundancy in a south-eastern parts of Serbian en-route airspace and better air traffic situation awareness for inbound flights originating from neighbouring countries’ airports (Sofia, Skopje). Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

NDB renewal Renew all NDBs 2018 - 2021 Planned ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved through better availability and reliability of the NAV infrastructure. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Reduced operations and maintenance costs

PENS PENS (Pan-European Network Service) ANSP backbone service implementation

By the end of 2016.

Ongoing ESSIP:COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: More cost effective than fragmented network services, meet current and future communication needs

Replacement of VORs with DVORs

Replacement of Podgorica VOR with DVOR

2016 - 2019 Ongoing ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved through better availability and reliability of the NAV infrastructure. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -




Secondary radar

Radar system upgrade at Srpska Gora (primary radar site) through installation of a collocated secondary radar.

By April 2015.

Completed ESSIP:ITY-ACID, ITY-SPI OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: Use of radar vectoring in TMA Podgorica becomes possible. Along with reduction of the controller workload, it leads to more efficient usage of terminal airspace. Safety: Improved through availability of SSR information in TMA Podgorica and increased SSR coverage redundancy in a certain part of en-route airspace. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Surveillance data real time analysis system

System for surveillance data continuous recording, real time analysis, data conversion, replay and display (permanent installation at Belgrade ATCC and portable on-site configuration)

By August 2015.

Completed ESSIP:ITY-SPI OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved through increased confidence in the quality of surveillance information Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

SWIM Implementation of the System Wide Information Management

2020 - Tentative plan ESSIP:COM11, INF04, INF07, ITY-ADQ OI-Steps: IS-0201, IS-0202, IS-0204, IS-0901-A Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: All stakeholders will share access to the information they need, including more reliable information about the future state of the ATM system and its environment. Greater automation of ATM will allow air traffic controllers to focus more on monitoring and contingency planning and this will also reduce data entry errors. Environment: Increased predictability of air traffic movements and infrastructure usage at the airport will lead to optimised usage of resources which will have a positive impact on the environment. Cost-Efficiency: As the SWIM concept grows in maturity, standardization and re-use of services between systems as well as the reduced duplication in managing the same information in multiple systems will bring down system operating costs for all ATM stakeholders.




Tivat Localizer renewal

Renew localizer for Tivat airport By March 2016


Capacity: - Safety: Improved through better availability and reliability of the NAV infrastructure. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Reduced operations and maintenance costs

Tivat TWR reconstruction

Taking into account limitations of the existing building and related infrastructure, which was built more than 40 year ago, it was decided to reconstruct this building to satisfy functional an professional needs.

By Jun 2016.


Capacity: - Safety: Improved situational awareness. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

VDF renewal Renew all airport VDFs. 2017 - 2019 Planned ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved situation awareness. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Reduced operations and maintenance costs


Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination

5.1 Regional cooperation

ECAA (European Common Aviation Area) is a project initiated and managed by the European Commission, aiming at the establishment of equal conditions of competition and common rules in aviation, including ATM and environment. As for ATM, the project will seek the highest degree of cooperation with the view to extending SES among the States concerned.

Montenegro ratified the ECAA Agreement in November 2007.

In January 2011 the Government of Montenegro promulgated the Law amending the Law on Ratification of ECAA Agreement allowing a whole set of SES regulatory acts listed in Annex I of the Agreement to be transposed into national legislation and published in Montenegrin (Official Gazette of Montenegro No 1/11, January 10 2011). In June 2012 the Government of Montenegro promulgated new Aviation Act that is fully compliant with the provisions of ECAA Agreement and it’s Annex I (“Official Gazette of Montenegro” No30/12. June 8 2012).

Along the lines of SES, specific and effective actions forward fulfilling operational requirements resulted in signing the agreements on operational-technical cooperation between SMATSA and other ANSPs in the region.

Agreements have been signed with NATA (Albania) and Slovenia Control (Slovenia) in 2010 and with HungaroControl (Hungary), BULATSA (Bulgaria) and MK CAA (FYROM) in 2011, as well as with ROMATSA (Romania) in 2012.

Agreements will consecutively contribute to airspace usage, increased capacity and ensure safe and efficient flow of air traffic with minimum delays.

Montenegro had an active role in ISIS programme (Implementation of the Single European Sky in the South East Europe) which provided support to ISIS Beneficiaries in transposing the European regulations and developing institutional capacity to implement those regulations. The ISIS Programme has come to a finish at the end of 2012.

On 27 June 2013, Integra signed a three-year framework contract with the European Commission (DG MOVE) on the ISIS II Programme. Montenegro is the Beneficiary of the ISIS II Programme. Objectives of the ISIS II Programme are the continuation of the ISIS technical assistance by upgrading the technical support beyond the ECAA Agreement and the preparation of the Beneficiaries for the challenges of implementing the SES II acquis

The work will be conducted as a continuation and reinforcement of the efforts undertaken under ISIS Programme 2010-2012 in order to build up on the progress already made.

The technical assistance under ISIS II is based on the Performance Scheme Pillar. CAD (The Republic of Serbia), SMATSA and the CAA have jointly set up a Performance Roadmap in cooperation with ISIS II, containing plan and steps towards implementing performance regulations by the end of the Reference Period 3.

Following High Level Meeting, held under auspices of the Regional Cooperation Council in Sarajevo on April 29th 2013, gathering national regulatory and supervisory authorities and air navigation service providers of Western Balkans states, regional DGs and CEOs have agreed upon the stepwise development of a Joint Service Provision Area Initiative (hereafter as: JSPA Initiative) in the South East Europe.

Montenegro has a leading role in JSPA Initiative, aiming to further promote Single European Sky concept in the region. The aim of JSPA Initiative is to provide benefits for its participants and their stakeholders through agreed projects whilst creating proactive relationships between regional CAAs and ANSPs. Agreed scope of JSPA Initiative activities is in line with European key performance areas (KPAs): safety, capacity, environment and cost efficiency.

The support and participation to the JSPA Initiative is currently given by Albania, Kosovo*, Hungary[1], Macedonia and Montenegro.

“EGNSS Building Capacity on EU Neighbouring multimodal Domains” i.e. BEYOND project is a project

*This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.

[1]Hungary is invited to participate, as appropriate, in the JSPA Initiative based on the temporary role allocated by NATO for the normalization of the upper airspace over Kosovo*.


financed by the European Commission with the objective to promote the use of EGNSS in countries neighboring the EU and encourage investment in the implementation of EGNSS, to prepare project participants to optimize the adoption of EGNSS outside the EU by contributing to increasing knowledge about EGNSS, and to support networking between EU and non-EU players and to create a basis for cooperation and business opportunities for aviation in the countries neighboring the EU.

Since the beginning of 2015 Montenegro participates in the work program named “Capacity building in Eastern Europe”, which is particularly dealing with improving knowledge, and building technical and operational capacity for the use of the EGNOS system in the Eastern Europe and is planned to be finished in 2017.

“Capacity Building for aviation Stakeholders” i.e. CaBilAvi project is a project financed by the European Commission that aims to share awareness and experience on the implementation of instrument flight procedures based on satellite technologies with the objective of performing a series of working groups covering activities such as PBN, procedure design and safety related activities among other topics.

Since the beginning of 2015 Montenegro participates in this project working, particularly, on implementation of a PBN instrument flight procedure based on SBAS technology at Tivat Airport. The project is planned to be finished in 2017.


Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation

6.1 Conventions

Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:

o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and

o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)

State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date

REG (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date ASP (By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement

ASP. Progress (**)

ASP Impl. Date MIL (By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement

MIL. Progress (**)

MIL Impl. Date APO (By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

ECAC Completed No Plan

EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable

Multi-N Planned Missing Data

APT Late


6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

Timescales:

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

No Plan

‐

Montenegro intends to implement the objective, but no firm plan exists at the moment. ‐

REG (By:12/2018)

Montenegro CAA

Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

Military Authority

‐ ‐ No Plan

‐

ASP (By:12/2018)

SMATSA Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

Military Authority

‐ ‐ No Plan

‐

MIL (By:12/2018)

Military Authority

Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

AOM19

Implement Advanced Airspace Management

Timescales:


Planned

‐

Implementation of the Advanced Airspace Management is planned to be finished by 2016. 31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA Implementation of the Advanced Airspace Management is planned to be finished by 2016.

CIMACT Planned

31/12/2016

AOM21.1

Implementation of Direct Routing

Timescales:

Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017

[PCP]

[Essential] Not Applicable

‐

SMATSA plan to implement FRA by the end of 2017. ‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

SMATSA ‐ ‐ Not Applicable

‐


AOM21.2

Implement Free Route Airspace

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential]

Partly Completed

‐

FRA night was implemented in April 2015. Expect to implement full FRA by 2017. 31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2021)

SMATSA Implemented FRA night in April 2015. ‐

Partly Completed

31/12/2017

AOP03

Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions

Timescales:


Late

‐

Montenegro institutions and relevant organizations will provide for the implementation of the objective by 2016.

31/12/2016

REG (By:12/2013)

Montenegro CAA

The Montenegro CAA will ensure a regulatory framework for the implementation of the objective.

‐ Late

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2013)

SMATSA The ATS Units in Montenegro plan to conclude a framework Agreement with the Airport operators as a basis for the application of the recommendations as per European Action plan. Also as per RS LSSIP.

‐ Late

31/05/2016

APO (By:12/2013)

Montenegro Airports

Montenegro Airports plans to implement all the relevant recommendations from the European Action Plan.

‐ Late

31/12/2016

AOP04.1

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1

Timescales:

‐ not applicable ‐

Not Applicable

LYPG ‐ Podgorica Airport

(Outside Applicability Area)

There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document.

‐

REG (By:12/2010)

ASP (By:12/2011)

APO (By:12/2010)

Montenegro Airports


‐ Not Applicable

‐


AOP04.2

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2

Timescales:


Not Applicable




‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

APO (By:12/2017)

Montenegro Airports


‐ Not Applicable

‐

AOP05

Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

Timescales:


Not Applicable




‐

ASP (By:12/2016)

APO (By:12/2016)

Montenegro Airports


‐ Not Applicable

‐

AOP10

Time Based Separation

Timescales:


[PCP]




Montenegro is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document.

‐

REG (By:12/2023)

ASP (By:12/2023)

AOP11

Initial Airport Operations Plan

Timescales:

Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021

[PCP]



Taking into account the traffic in Montenegro, there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document.

‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

SMATSA Taking into account the traffic in Montenegro, there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document.

‐ Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2021)

Montenegro Airports

Taking into account the traffic in Montenegro, there is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document.

‐ Not Applicable

‐


AOP12

Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring

Timescales:


[PCP]




Montenegro is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document

‐

ASP (By:12/2020)

APO (By:12/2020)

ATC02.5

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Completed

‐

The implementation of APW was done under the FAMUS Project. 31/01/2014

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA The implementation of APW was done under the FAMUS Project. ‐ Completed

31/01/2014

ATC02.6

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Completed

‐

The implementation of MSAW ‐ level 2 was done under the FAMUS Project. 31/01/2014

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA The implementation of Ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2 was done under the FAMUS Project.

‐ Completed

31/01/2014

ATC02.7

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Late

‐

Planned for implementation within a new system. 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA Implementation is planned for Beograd and Podgorica airports. ‐ Late

31/12/2020


ATC07.1

Implement AMAN tools and procedures

Timescales:


Not Applicable



There is no operational justification to implement the tool, at present. ‐

ASP (By:12/2015)

ATC12.1

Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring

Timescales:


Completed

‐

Implemented in 2011. 16/05/2011

ASP (By:12/2021)

SMATSA ‐ ‐ Completed

16/05/2011

ATC15

Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations


Timescales:


Not Applicable

‐

There is no operational justification to implement this tool. ‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

SMATSA There is no operational justification to implement this tool. ‐ Not Applicable

‐

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1

Timescales:


Completed

‐

Montenegro has transposed Commission Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011. All aircraft in Montenegro that are required to be equipped with ACAS are equipped with ACAS II (TCAS 7.1). Training of the ANSP personnel was completed in 2012.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

Montenegro CAA

Montenegro has transposed Commission Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011. All aircraft in Montenegro that are required to be equipped with ACAS are equipped with ACAS II (TCAS 7.1).

‐ Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)

SMATSA Training completed in March 2012. ‐ Completed

31/03/2012

MIL (By:12/2015)

Military Authority

Military traffic is at a very low level and there are no transport‐type nor tactical aircraft in Montenegro.

‐ Not Applicable

‐


ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

Timescales:


Planned

‐

Service provider is planning to implement this objective by 2018. 31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

SMATSA SMATSA is planning to implement this objective. ‐ Planned

31/12/2018

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS

Timescales:


Late

‐

Since the new AFTN/AMHS system is implemented by FAMUS project, migration from AFTN to AMHS will be done after successful tests performed with adjacent COM centres.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2014)

SMATSA Since the new AFTN/AMHS system is implemented by FAMUS project, migration from AFTN to AMHS will be done after successful tests performed with adjacent COM centres.

AMHS / PENS Late

31/12/2016

COM11

Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

Timescales:


Planned

‐

SMATSA is planning to implement Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM. 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

SMATSA SMATSA is planning to implement Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM.

Air‐Ground

radio network

enhancement

/ Beograd

ATCC Air‐

Ground radio

network

system

upgrade /

Implementati

on of Voice

and Data

transfer over

Internet

Protocol (IP)

in ATM /

SWIM

Planned

31/12/2020


ENV01

Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

Timescales:


Not Applicable



Montenegro is outside the applicability area. 31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2013)

SMATSA Currently only tentative plans exist regarding this objective. ‐ Not Applicable

31/12/2013

APO (By:12/2013)

Montenegro Airports

No plan for implementation at present. The issue is more related to the work technology of ANSP.

‐ Not Applicable

‐

ENV02

Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports

Timescales:


Not Applicable




‐

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document.

‐ Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016)

Montenegro Airports


‐ Not Applicable

‐

FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services

Timescales:


Completed

‐

No direct benefit for ANSP, but the objective has been implemented through FAMUS project. 31/03/2013

ASP (By:07/2014)

SMATSA No direct benefit for ANSP, but the objective has been implemented through FAMUS project.

‐ Completed

31/03/2013

FCM03

Implement collaborative flight planning

Timescales:


Completed

‐

The objective completed within the framework of the FAMUS project. 31/05/2011

ASP (By:12/2017)

SMATSA The objective completed within the framework of the FAMUS project. ‐ Completed

31/05/2011


FCM04

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1


Timescales:


Not Applicable

‐

Montenegro is not in the area of applicability of the objective ‐

ASP (By:12/2015)

FCM05

Implementation of interactive rolling NOP

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential] Planned

‐

Automated ASM support is planned to be integrated into the NM system by the end of 2016. 31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2017)

SMATSA Automated ASM support is planned to be integrated into the NM system by the end of 2016.

‐ Planned

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2021)

Montenegro Airports

There are no coordinated airports in Montenegro. AOP11 is not applicable therefore no AOP information is available

‐ Not Applicable

‐

FCM06

Traffic Complexity Assessment

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential] No Plan

‐

Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

SMATSA Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

INF04

Implement integrated briefing

Timescales:


Late

‐

The integration of AIS briefing and FPL was implemented in April 2013 through the installation of EAD Briefing Facility. Integration of MET is planned to be completed by the end of 2018.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2012)

SMATSA Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented by the end of 2018.

SWIM Late

31/12/2018


INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD)

Timescales:


No Plan

‐

The objective is under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐

REG (By:05/2018)

Montenegro CAA

The objective is under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

ASP (By:05/2018)

SMATSA No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. SMATSA will make plans related to eTOD when the national policies are created by the state.

SWIM No Plan

‐

APO (By:05/2018)

Montenegro Airports

No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. Montenegro Airports will make plans related to eTOD when the national policies are created by the state.

‐ No Plan

‐

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft identification

Timescales:

Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025

Planned

‐

Full implementation of Enhanced Mode S is planned. Currently, all SMATSA secondary radars are operating as Enhanced Mode S radar stations and activities on testing Mode S operation have been conducted. Accordingly, SMATSA is planning to upgrade TopSky‐ATC system fo r Enhanced Mode S functionality and perform necessary testing activities so that such transition could be finalized by the end of 2017.

31/12/2017

ASP (By:01/2020)

SMATSA SMATSA has started conducting activities on radar systems testing in order to be able to implement Mode S in its whole area of responsibility. Mixed Mode operation is applied on two secondary radars.

Enhanced

Mode‐S /

Secondary

radar

Planned

31/12/2017


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

Timescales:

Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

Late

‐

Currently, there are no legal basis for the implementation of this objective. Montenegro plans to implement this objective.

31/12/2017

REG (By:06/2017)

Montenegro CAA

Currently, there are no legal basis for the implementation of this objective. Commission Regulation (EU) No. 73/2010 is in the process of transposition into national legislative system to provide for the legal basis, but it is not expected to be implemented before 2017.

‐

Late

31/07/2017

ASP (By:06/2017)

SMATSA SMATSA develops detailed implementation plan to meet requirements of ADQ regulation that has been adopted in Montenegro, as national rule on aeronautical information services.

SWIM Late

31/12/2017

APO (By:06/2017)

Montenegro Airports

Currently, there are no legal basis for the implementation of this objective. Montenegro Airports plans to implement this objective.

‐ Late

31/07/2017

ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285

Timescales:

ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

Late

‐

State has transposed Commission Regulation (EC) No. 29/2009 and Commission Regulation (EC) 2015/310 into national legislation. The objective will be met by FAMUS project in two‐phase approach.

31/12/2018

REG (By:02/2018)

Montenegro CAA

State has transposed Commission Regulation (EC) No. 29/2009 and Commission Regulation (EC) 2015/310 into national legislation and plans to conduct all NSA tasks in accordance with it.

‐ Late

31/12/2018

ASP (By:02/2018)

SMATSA The objective will be met by 12/2018. CPDLC Late

31/12/2018

MIL (By:01/2019)

Military Authority

Military traffic is at a very low level and there are no transport type state aircraft in Montenegro.

‐ Not Applicable

‐


ITY‐AGVCS2

Implement 8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL195

Timescales:

Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

Planned

‐

Montenegro has transposed Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1079/2012 in 2014 to provide for the legal basis for the implementation of this objective. Montenegro plans to implement this objective. ANSP's voice communication systems have already been upgraded to support 8.33kHz channel spacing.

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

Montenegro CAA

Montenegro has transposed Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1079/2012 in 2014 to provide for the legal basis for the implementation of this objective. Montenegro plans to implement this objective.

‐

Planned

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

SMATSA Voice communication systems have already been upgraded to support 8.33kHz channel spacing.

‐ Planned

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2020)

Military Authority

There are no military ANSPs in Montenegro. SMATSA is providing service for both civil and military users. Some military aircraft have been equipped with 8.33 kHz radios and the equipage of all helicopters is planned by the end of 2018.

‐

Planned

31/12/2018

APO (By:12/2018)

Montenegro Airports

All the communication equipment used by Montenegro airports vehicles operates in UHF and therefore is not the subject of the Regulation (EU) No. 1079/2012.

‐ Not Applicable

‐


ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes

Timescales:

Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL285 in the airspace defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/310: 05/02/2018

Completed

‐

Montenegro has transposed Commission Regulation (EC) No 1032/2006. The objective was met through the framework of FAMUS modernization program of the common Montenegro / Serbian ANSP.

31/12/2012

ASP (By:02/2018)

SMATSA The objective met within the framework of the FAMUS project. CPDLC Completed

31/05/2011

MIL (By:12/2012)

Military Authority

Military has no role in ATS provision. ‐ Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐FMTP

Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)

Timescales:

Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

Completed

‐

The objective was implemented through the framework of FAMUS modernisation programme of the common Montenegrin / Serbian ANSP. Currently, there are 6 of 9 operational IPv6 connections. OLDI partners Tirana, Skopje and Brinidisi are still using X.25 connections. SMATSA is waiting those OLDI partners to become ready for IPv6 implementation.

30/06/2013

ASP (By:12/2014)

SMATSA

ATM‐systems have been enhanced to support OLDI over IP v.6 according to the FAMUS implementation schedule. Currently, there are 6 of 9 operational IPv6 connections. OLDI partners Tirana, Skopje and Brinidisi are still using X.25 connections. SMATSA is waiting those OLDI partners to become ready for IPv6 implementation.

CPDLC / PENS

Completed

30/06/2013

MIL (By:12/2014)

Military Authority

Military has no role in ATS provision. ‐ Not Applicable

‐


ITY‐SPI

Surveillance performance and interoperability

Timescales:

Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

Late

‐

Montenegro plans to implement this objective. SMATSA is conducting activities to meet the interoperability requirements for surveillance data. The CAA has the capacity to review the safety assessments delivered to it.

31/12/2016

REG (By:02/2015)

Montenegro CAA

The CAA has the capacity to review the safety assessments delivered to it. ‐ Late

31/12/2016

ASP (By:02/2015)

SMATSA SMATSA is conducting activities to meet the interoperability requirements for surveillance data.

Enhanced

Mode‐S /

Secondary

radar /

Surveillance

data real time

analysis

system

Late

31/12/2016

MIL (By:06/2020)

Military Authority

Military traffic is at a very low level and there are no operational benefits deriving from the implementation of this objective by military users.

‐ Not Applicable

‐

NAV03

Implementation of P‐RNAV

Timescales:


Planned

‐

Montenegro plans to introduce P‐RNAV procedures in accordance with the published PBN Concept Implementation Plan.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2023)

SMATSA ANSP is planning to implement RNP‐1 in accordance with PBN Manual. ‐ Planned

31/12/2016


NAV10

Implement APV procedures

Timescales:


No Plan

‐

Currently only tentative plans exist regarding this objective. 31/12/2016

REG (By:04/2016)

Montenegro CAA

EASA AMC 20‐27 and EASA AMC 20‐28 have been transposed into national legislative system.

‐ Completed

31/12/2014

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA Currently only tentative plans exist regarding this objective. ‐ No Plan

31/12/2016

SAF10

Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

Timescales:


Late

‐

The measures in accordance with the European action plan for airspace infringement risk reduction will be implemented by SMATSA, and will be applied by the ATS units providing services within the airspace of Montenegro.

31/05/2018

REG (By:12/2011)

Montenegro CAA

Montenegro CAA will adopt the Action plan and provide for its verification and implementation monitoring.

‐ Late

30/06/2017

ASP (By:12/2011)

SMATSA FIS service is provided as part of ATC services and separate service Implementation is planned for 2018.

‐ Late

31/05/2018

MIL (By:12/2011)

Military Authority

There are no military ANSPs in Montenegro. SMATSA is providing service for both civil and military users. Military traffic is at a very low level.

‐ Not Applicable

‐

SAF11

Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions

Timescales:


Planned

‐

Montenegro plans to implement this objective. 31/12/2017

REG (By:01/2018)

Montenegro CAA

The CAA plans to implement this objective in accordance with the actions listed in State Safety Plan.

‐ Planned

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2014)

SMATSA SMATSA has implemented the appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions.

‐ Completed

31/12/2013

APO (By:12/2014)

Montenegro Airports

Montenegro Airports plans to implement this objective in accordance with the actions listed in State Safety Plan.

‐ Late

31/12/2017


Annexes

Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP Focal Point for Montenegro Civil Aviation Agency Andrea Dukanac

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Civil Aviation Agency Andrea Dukanac

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP SMATSA Bojan Savnik

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport

LSSIP Focal Point for Military Montenegrin Air Force Namik Arifović

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person for Montenegro DPS/PEPR Octavian Cioara

ESSIP Objective Implementation

ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI, E. REUBER

A. DYBOWSKA Goran Živanović (SMATSA)

AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Goran Živanović (SMATSA)

AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Danijel Miler (SMATSA)

AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Danijel Miler (SMATSA)

AOP03 T. LICU

P. VRANJKOVIC Veselin Popović (CAA) Dejan Jocić (SMATSA)

AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC

AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL

AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL

AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC

ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Goran Živanović (SMATSA)



ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI

L. DELL’ORTO Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA) Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Goran Živanović (SMATSA)

ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA)

ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI

L. DELL’ORTO Miodrag Stanić (CAA)

Zoran Lalović (CAA)

ATC17 S. MORTON

L. DELL’ORTO Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA) Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU

A. KOKONA Marko Trnavac (SMATSA)

Đorđe Metikoš (SMATSA)


ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

COM11 L. POPESCU

A. KOKONA Biljana Milošević (CAA)

Natalija Golubović (SMATSA)

ENV01 C. FABER

B. HILL Vojislav Bijelić (SMATSA) Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL

FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Željko Šokčić (SMATSA)

FCM03 TBD O. CIOARA Željko Šokčić (SMATSA)

FCM04 P. HOP O. CIOARA Željko Šokčić (SMATSA)

FCM05 I. MENDES O. CIOARA Željko Šokčić (SMATSA)

FCM06 P. HOP O. ALFARO

INF04 P. MATERN

A-P. FRANGOLHO Marko Ljubičić (SMATSA)

Dragan Radovanović(SMATSA)

INF07 A. PETROVSKY

A-P. FRANGOLHO Andrea Dukanac (CAA)

Đorđe Samrdžija (SMATSA)

ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY

O. CIOARA Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

Đorđe Zečević (SMATSA)

ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER

A-P. FRANGOLHO Andrea Dukanac (CAA)

Đorđe Samrdžija (SMATSA)

ITY-AGDL

S. DISSING

A. KOKONA Biljana Milošević (CAA)

Zoran Kostić (CAA)

Zoran Latifić (SMATSA)

Miroslav Glavonjić (SMATSA)

ITY-AGVCS2 J POUZET O. ALFARO Radmila Papulić (SMATSA)

ITY-COTR S. MORTON

L. DELL’ORTO Biljana Milošević (CAA)

Zoran Kostić (CAA)

ITY-FMTP

L. POPESCU

O. ALFARO Biljana Milošević (CAA)

Zoran Kostić (CAA)

Miroslav Glavonjić (SMATSA)

ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART

O. CIOARA Mira Milikić (CAA)

Marina Jović (SMATSA)

NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC

A. KOKONA Aleksandar Đorđević

Vojislav Bijelić (SMATSA)

NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA Vojislav Bijelić (SMATSA)

SAF10 T. LICU

I. FEIJT Veselin Popović (CAA)

Dejan Jocić (SMATSA)

SAF11 S. LAWRENCE

I. FEIJT Veselin Popović (CAA)

Dejan Jocić (SMATSA)


Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts


Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations

Specific abbreviations for Montenegro:

ATCC Air Traffic Control Centre

CAA Civil Aviation Agency (of Montenegro)

CAD Civil Aviation Directorate (of Serbia)

FAMUS Future ATM Modernisation Upgrade System

ISIS Implementation of SES in South East Europe

MoD Ministry of Defence

SMATSA Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) MONTENEGRO · 2019-02-18 · Montenegro is committed to...

Documents

Transcript of Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) MONTENEGRO · 2019-02-18 · Montenegro is committed to...