Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - SLOVAKIA

Level 1 - Implementation Overview

Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - SLOVAKIA

EUROCONTROL

LSSIP Year 2017 Slovakia Released Issue

Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Slovak Republic

Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/38

Date of Edition 04/04/2018

LSSIP Focal Point A. Lamprecht ‐ [email protected]

LSSIP Contact Person A. Dybowska ‐ [email protected]

Status Released

Intended for Agency Stakeholders

Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2017

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐plan

Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2016

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐report

European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

National AIP http://aim.lps.sk/web/?fn=1&lng=en

FAB Performance Plan Latest FABCE Performance Plan V2.0 For details contact: Mr Matej Eljon matej.eljon@fab‐ce.eu

LSSIP Year 2017 Slovakia Released Issue

CONTENTS

1. National ATM Environment ............................................................. 6 1.1. Geographical Scope .............................................................................................6 1.2. National Stakeholders .........................................................................................9

2. Traffic and Capacity ....................................................................... 19 2.1. Evolution of traffic in the Slovak Republic ....................................................... 19 2.2. ACC Bratislava ................................................................................................... 20

3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 23

4. Implementation Projects ............................................................... 24 4.1. National projects .............................................................................................. 24 4.2. FAB projects ..................................................................................................... 25 4.3. Regional projects .............................................................................................. 27

5. Cooperation activities .................................................................... 28 5.1. FAB Co‐ordination ............................................................................................ 28 5.2. Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 29

6. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................. 30 6.1. State View......................................................................................................... 30 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 36

Annexes

LSSIP Year 2017 Slovakia 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

Slovak airspace is one of the most significant air corridors with most traffic flying in its western part. All five sectors were activated last year and we saw increased number of movements compared to the previous year. The ´average delay per one movement´ indicator was stable and ensured the flawless operation.

The Slovak Republic as an EU member is applying all ATM regulations adopted by EU and related legal acts prepared by EASA. No important changes have occurred during the past year.

Traffic and Capacity

Calculation of the Slovak capacity target is based on the latest STATFOR forecast of annual traffic growth and planned technical improvements of the ATM system. Delay targets correspond to an objective capacity increase during RP2 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Value Value Value Value Value 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10 Bratislava/M. R. ŠTEFÁNIK Airport has never experienced and is not expected to experience in the future ATFM arrival delay, therefore the national target is set to 0 min.

Progress per SESAR Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase.

Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.

The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011‐2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.


Pre‐SESAR Implementation

2010 2019

70%

PCP Implementation

2015 2023

17%

Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6.1.3.

Block 0 2010 2018

70%

n/a

39%

Pre‐SESAR

70% 52%

100%

4%

78%

Pre‐SESAR

Pre‐SESAR

Pre‐SESAR

PCP

PCP

PCP

PCP

Optimised ATM Network Services

Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing

Airport Operations

9%

Enabling Aviation Infrastructure


ATM Deployment Outlook

State objectives

Deployed in 2016‐2017: ‐ Direct Routing [AOM21.1] 100% progress ‐ Ground‐Based Safety Nets [ATC02.8] 100% progress

‐ APV Procedures [NAV10] 98% progress ‐ eTOD [INF07] 85% progress ‐ Aeronautical Information [ITY‐ADQ] 76% progress ‐ ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 62% progress ‐ Collaborative Flight Planning [FCM03] 32% progress

‐ MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 48% progress ‐ NewPENS [COM12] 8% progress ‐ Enhanced STCA for TMAs [ATC02.9] 3% progress

‐ Aircraft Identification [ITY‐ACID] 96% progress ‐ Surveillance Performance & Interoperability [ITY‐SPI] 64% progress ‐ 8,33 kHz below FL195 [ITY‐AGVCS2] 24% progress ‐ Data Link [ITY‐AGDL] 14% progress

‐ Voice over IP [COM11] 10% progress ‐ Free Route Airspace [AOM21.2] 5% progress ‐ STAM Phase 2 [FCM04.2] 3% progress ‐ Traffic Complexity [FCM06] 0% progress ‐ Real‐Time Airspace Data [AOM19.2] 0% progress ‐ ASM/ATFCM process [AOM19.3] 0% progress ‐ Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 0% progress

Airport objectives – LZZI ‐ ZILINA

‐ CCOs [ENV03] 25% progress

Airport objectives – LZTT ‐ POPRAD‐TATRY


By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+


Airport objectives – LZIB ‐ Bratislava Airport


Airport objectives – LZKZ ‐ KOSICE


Airport objectives – LZPP ‐ PIESTANY


By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players ‐ civil and military ‐ and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;

Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;

Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;

Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high‐level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017. In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.

The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


1. National ATM Environment

1.1. Geographical Scope

International Membership

Slovak Republic is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC June 1991

EUROCONTROL 1997

European Union 2004

EASA May 2004

ICAO 1947

NATO March 2004

ITU February 1993

Geographical description of the FIR(s)

BRATISLAVA FIR is defined as airspace over the Slovak Republic within the state boundary.

BRATISLAVA FIR consists of Controlled Airspace and Uncontrolled Airspace.

Provision of service: H24

Controlled Airspace:

Bratislava CTA

- Airspace outside CTR/TMA from 8 000 ft AMSL (10 000 ft AMSL within lateral limits of TMA 4 Poprad) to FL 660; ATS provided by Area Control Centre

- Bratislava CTA can be divided laterally and/or vertically up to 5 controlling sectors

- Class of airspace: C

CTR/TMA (see enclosed map)

- Class of airspace C or D, ATS provided by appropriate approach and/or tower units

Uncontrolled Airspace:

‐ Airspace outside CTR/TMA from GND to 8 000 ft AMSL (10 000 ft AMSL within lateral limits of TMA 4 Poprad), FIS provided by Flight Information Centre

‐ Class of Airspace: G

In terms of route structure, BRATISLAVA FIR is divided to Lower Airspace (GND/FL 245) and Upper Airspace (FL 245/UNL)

The following map shows the geographical situation of the Slovak airspace.


Airspace Classification and Organisation


Outside OPR HR of Piešťany TWR the airspace classification of Piešťany CTR and TMA is changed from D to G.

Outside OPR HR of Tatry TWR the airspace classification of Tatry CTR and Poprad TMA 1 and TMA 2 is changed from D to G and the airspace classification of Poprad TMA 3 and TMA 4 is changed from D to C.

Outside OPR HR of Žilina TWR the airspace classification of Žilina CTR and TMAs up to 8 000 ft is changed from D to G, above that level from D to C.

Outside OPR HR of Sliač APP/TWR the airspace of Sliač CTR and TMA becomes restricted/temporary reserved airspace.

1.2. National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in the Slovak Republic are the following:

The Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic (MoT SK);

The Transport Authority (TA) in its independent function of National Supervisory Authority (NSA SK) in accordance with EU legislation and Aviation Act of the Slovak Republic;

Aviation and Maritime Investigation Authority (AMIA);

Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik, v skratke LPS SR, š. p., a state enterprise, designated for provision of air navigation services;

Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ), designated for provision of Meteorological services; The Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic ‐ Air Force of the Slovak Republic (MoD SK‐ VzS OS SR) designated for provision of ATS at Sliač Airport;

Letisko M. R. Štefánika – Airport Bratislava, a. s. (BTS);

Military Aviation State Administration Department (MAA) of the Ministry of Defense of the Slovak Republic

Note: The Functions of National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 is performed by the following authorities :

The Transport Authority ‐ section of air navigation services and aerodromes.

Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic, Directorate General of the Civil Aviation.

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. More detailed charts are presented in Annex B.


Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

Civil Aviation in the Slovak Republic is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic (MoT SK).

The regulatory entity under the structure of MoT SK in Civil Aviation is the Directorate General of Civil Aviation. It is (among other functions in civil aviation) responsible for:

• state transport policy in Civil Aviation;

• representing state in international civil aviation organisations;

• monitoring of state supervision in Civil Aviation;

• legislation and regulatory process;

• designation of Air Navigation Services Providers.

The Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic (MoD SK) is responsible for the process of national military aviation legislation and regulation of military aviation in general. MoD SK is responsible for handling of military air traffic in reserved areas for state military aircraft (licensing of military ATCOs). The Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic for these purposes delegated certain responsibilities to the Military Aviation Authority (MAA).

The Ministry of Interior of the Slovak Republic is responsible for regulation of state aircraft other than military aircraft.


The Transport Authority (TA) has been established as a legal successor of the Civil Aviation Authority of the Slovak Republic with effect from 1st of January, 2014. The TA is an independent institution represents the Slovak Republic at EASA, performs some tasks on behalf of European Aviation Safety Agency and fulfils the role of National Supervision Authority for SES purposes (NSA). The TA is responsible for but not limited to:

• TA certification of Air Navigation Services Providers,

• certification of systems used or intended to use by Air Traffic Services Providers, Aeronautical Telecommunication Services Providers, Aeronautical Information Services Providers and Meteorological Services Providers,

• licensing of Air Traffic Services Personnel,

• performance monitoring of Air Navigation Services,

• supervision of Air Navigation Services.

MoT SK acts as an economic and market regulator in the civil aviation.

In general, the MoT SK is responsible for preparation, transposition and implementation of legal rules. The TA acts as advisory body in this process, as well as, according to the Civil Aviation Act, it has a legislative initiative.

The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis

Rule‐making MoT SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act (143/1998 as amended)

Safety Oversight TA (NSA) EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Enforcement actions in case of non‐compliance with safety regulatory requirements

MoT SK

TA

EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Airspace MoT SK and MoD SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Economic MoT SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Environment MoT SK EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Security MoT SK, TA EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Accident investigation AMIA EU legislation and Civil Aviation Act

Enforcement actions in case of non‐compliance with safety regulatory requirements: TA is acting as certifying authority and MoT SK as designating authority. Enforcement actions are linked accordingly to scope of responsibility.

Airspace: Major changes of Airspace are associated with mutual co‐ordination/approval of MoT SK and MoD SK.

Security: MoT SK is responsible for international security activity. TA is responsible for assessment of security programmes, supervision of organizations which are obligated to have security processes in place, assessment of background check of individuals. Detailed description of tasks and responsibilities are published in National Aviation Security Programme which is published as special Attachment to national version ICAO Annex 17.


Administration in the Civil Aviation of Slovak Republic

MoT SK and TA are institutionally separated from ANSPs.

In general the MoT SK is responsible for preparation, transposition and implementation of legal rules. The TA acts as advisory body in this process, as well as, according to the Civil Aviation Act, it has a legislative initiative and it adopts manuals and procedures for executive activities. TA main responsibility is safety and security oversight of ANSPs.

For ATM safety regulation, the responsible body is MoT SK (Directorate General of Civil Aviation) and for executive manuals and procedures, the responsible body is TA along with deep responsibility of safety oversight and licensing procedures.

Annual Report published: Y http://www.telecom.gov.sk/index/open_file.php?file=vyrocnespravy/2016/vs_2016.pdf

TA Transport Authority Y http://nsat.sk/wp‐content/uploads/2014/07/Vyrocna‐sprava‐DU‐za‐r‐2016_konecna.pdf

An organisational Chart is shown in Annex B.

Web addresses:

MoT SK: www.mindop.sk

TA: www.nsat.sk


LPS SR, š. p.

Service provided

Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik, v skratke LPS SR, š. p., (LPS) has been entrustedwith provision of air navigation services under the Slovak Laws since January 1993 and designated as ANSP in 2006. LPS, state enterprise, is acting as a commercial entity.

The Supervisory Board of LPS comprises of members who are selected by the MoT SK and members elected by LPS employees, to maintain the majority of the State representation.

The mission of LPS is in the following domains:

• Air Traffic Services Operations;

• Aeronautical Telecommunication Services;

• ATS Infrastructure Operation, Maintenance, and Development;

• Aeronautical Information Management, including Aeronautical Information Services;

• Air Traffic Services Safety and Quality;

• Search and rescue Co‐ordination;

• Administrative and Finance.

Governance: State enterprise Ownership: Slovak Republic

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en‐route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET N

ATCO training Y

Others NA

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y HU

Annual Report published: Y http://www.lps.sk/images/vs/vyrsprava2016sk.pdf

LPS website: www.lps.sk



Slovenský hydrometeorologický ústav (SHMÚ)

Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ) has been entrusted for provision of meteorological services under the Slovak Laws since January 1993 and being designated as Met Service Provider in 2006 and re‐designated in 2013. SHMÚ is state subsidised organization operating under the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic.



ATC en‐route N

ATC approach N

ATC Aerodrome(s) N

AIS N

CNS N

MET Y

ATCO training N/A

Others N/A



Y HU

Annual Report published: Y http://www.shmu.sk

More detailed annual report is available for NSA

SHMU website: www.shmu.sk

MoD ‐ Air Force of the Slovak Republic (MoD ‐ VzS OS SR)

MoT re‐designated MoD ‐ VzS OS SR for provision of air navigation services in June 2013. VzS OS SR is providing ANS at Sliač Airport as the military provider fulfilling civil aviation regulations.



ATC en‐route N

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS N At Sliač Airport provided by LPS (based on the contract arrangements)

CNS Y

MET N At Sliač Airport provided by SHMÚ

ATCO training Y Only unit training, other types of training are provided by LPS (based on the contract arrangements)

Others NA



Y HU

Annual Report published: N


ATC systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 N

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales Air Systems

Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2018 ‐ 2019

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ‐

ATC Unit Bratislava ACC, Štefánik APP/TWR

SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: EUROCONTROL

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2018

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ‐

ATC Unit Bratislava ACC, Štefánik APP/TWR

ATC Units

The ATC units in the Slovak Republic airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En‐route TMA

Bratislava ACC 5+1 AT, CZ, PL, UA, HU

Štefánik APP/TWR 1 AT, HU + 1 TWR for Bratislava M. R. Štefánik Airport

Košice APP/TWR 1 HU + 1 TWR for Košice Airport

Tatry TWR 1 PL Incl. TWR for Poprad‐Tatry Airport

Piešťany TWR 1 N/A Incl. TWR for Piešťany Airport

Žilina TWR 1 CZ Incl. TWR for Žilina Airport

Sliač APP/TWR 1 N/A + 1 TWR for Sliač Airport

1Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


Airports

General information

The main airports/aerodromes in the Slovak Republic are:

Letisko M. R. Štefánik Bratislava ‐ Bratislava Airport, Košice Airport, Piešťany Airport, Sliač Airport, Poprad‐Tatry Airport and Žilina Airport. They all are international airports for public use.

All above‐mentioned airports are joint stock companies. Ownership differs on individual airports and stakeholders are usually municipalities, regional governments, MoT SK and private companies.

Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives. So the following airport is covered in this LSSIP: Bratislava Airport (LZIB).

Note: Traffic density at Bratislava Airport does not require implementation of all Objectives as they are defined for the Airports listed in the ESSIP Plan. In such cases N/A is used. Nevertheless, all above mentioned Objectives are carefully monitored and implemented as appropriate.

The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/LZIB

Military Authorithies

The Military Stakeholders involved in ATM in the Slovak Republic are composed of:

• Military Aviation State Administration Department (MAA),;

• Air Force of the Slovak Republic (VzS OS SR).

They report to the Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic.

Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.


Regulatory role

MAA is established by the Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic, which is responsible for safety oversight of military aviation and, participate on regulatory functions.


Regulatory framework and rule‐making

Oversight

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N

Level of such legal provision: State Law (Act 143/1998 as amended §46 and §48a)

Level of such legal provision: State Law and EU legislation.

Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, the Chairman of the Parliament and the President of the Slovak Republic.

Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, the Chairman of the Parliament and the President of the Slovak Republic and EU structures.

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N

OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y OAT/GAT Co‐ordination N

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N

ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification N

ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision N

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: NA Additional Information: NA

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP NA

National Military AIP Y National Military AIP NA

EUROCONTROL eAIP Y EUROCONTROL eAIP NA

Other: N Other: N

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: MAA SK

National Supervisory Authority (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: TA

Additional information: NA Additional information: NA


Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

Y If YES, since: June 2015 Duration of the Certificate:

2 years

Certificate issued by: TA If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

NA

Additional Information: Certification of providing of ANS for GAT on the Sliač Airport was completed.

User role

Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En‐Route Y OAT Unit En‐Route N

Approach/TMA Y ATC Units /VzS OS SR Approach/TMA:LZSL Y

Airfield/TWR/GND Y ATC Units /VzS OS SR Airfield/TWR/GND: LZSL Y

AIS N AIS N

MET Y MET N

SAR Y VzS OS SR SAR Y

TSA/TRA monitoring Y AMC FIS Y

Other: none Other: None

Additional Information: Tactical co‐ordination with Air Defence (AD) unit

Additional Information: Military launched the provision of ANS for GAT at the Sliač Airport as from June 2011.

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service

If Military fly GAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges N

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF Y

CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 N Mode S Y ACAS Y

Others: Mode S except fighter aircraft

Military in SK applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




2. Traffic and Capacity

2.1. Evolution of traffic in the Slovak Republic

2017

Traffic in Slovakia increased by 4.1% during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2016.

2018‐2022

The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 1.2% and 5.3%, with a baseline growth of 3.1% during the planning cycle.

0

100.000

200.000

300.000

400.000

500.000

600.000

700.000

800.000

2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F

IFR

flig

hts

Slovakia - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecastA = ActualF = Forecast

2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 FH 4.9% 7.0% 5.5% 5.2% 4.4% 4.2% 4.1%B 9.8% 7.2% 6.4% 4.4% 4.9% 2.9% 2.7% 2.3% 2.5% 2.5%L 4.0% 2.9% 0.4% 1.1% 0.5% 0.8% 0.8%

ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017)IFR flights yearly growth

Slovakia


2.2. ACC Bratislava

Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022

Performance summer 2017

Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer

Capacity gap Ref value Actual

+3.9 % 136 (+2%) 0.15 0.05 No

The average en‐route delay per flight remained at 0.05 minutes per flight in Summer 2017.

58% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 42% for weather.

Capacity Plan +2% Achieved Comments

Free Route Concept gradual implementation for FAB CE No

Rolling ASM/ATFCM process No

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes

Continuous improvements of the route network and sectorisation No

Enhanced sectorisation according to FABCE airspace plan No

Continuous recruitment to increase staff level Yes

Optimisation of sector opening times Yes

Maximum configuration: 5 sectors Yes 5 sectors opened

Summer 2017 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 136, 2% higher than in 2016. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 128 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 118.

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Peak Day Traffic 1563 1924 1832 2002 2058

Summer Traffic 1276 1419 1500 1596 1658

Yearly Traffic* 1055 1161 1243 1323 1426

Summer Traffic Forecast 1704 1763 1805 1850 1894

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 1744 1841 1935 2018 2101

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 1674 1681 1697 1712 1719

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.23 0.12 0.05 0.05

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.00 0.14 0.08 0.03 0.04

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LZBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017


Planning Period 2018‐2022

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

Summer Capacity Plan

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Free Route Airspace

Free Route Concept gradual

implementation for FAB CE

SEENFRA Implementation

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

FABCE Study ongoing

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM

Airspace

Continuous improvements of the route network and sectorisation

Enhanced sectorisation according to FABCE airspace plan

East/West sector configuration

Procedures

Staffing Continuous recruitment to increase staff level

Technical HW/SW Upgrade

AGDL

Capacity Optimisation of sector opening times

Significant Events FRA

implementation H/W upgrade

Max sectors 5 5 6 6 6

Planned Annual Capacity increase. 1% 3% 2% 0% 0%

Reference Profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% N/A N/A N/A

Current Routes Profile % Increase 1% 3% N/A N/A N/A

Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile

0.7% 3.7% N/A N/A N/A

Difference Capacity Plan v. Current Routes Profile

0.0% 0.0% N/A N/A N/A

Annual Reference Value (min) 0.11 0.10 N/A N/A N/A

Summer reference value (min) 0.16 0.15 N/A N/A N/A

Additional information

H 136 0% 136 0%

Ref. 136 0% 136 0%

L 136 0% 136 0%

Open 136 0% 136 0%

C/R 137 1% 141 3%

136LZBB

ACC2017

baseline 2018

Capacity Profiles

Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)

2019


An outline of available sector configuration for a typical weekday and a weekend day for summer 2018

2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook

No structural lack of capacity is foreseen for Bratislava ACC for the period 2018‐2022. Continual increase of capacity is covered mainly by improving of flow and capacity management techniques, optimizing sector configuration and sector opening times, increasing available sectors and introducing system changes that decrease workload of ATCOs. Continuous recruitment of additional controllers is in progress, in order to maintain sufficient level of operational staff.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WD

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WE

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 136 136

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 136 136

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 137 141

Capacity Profile ‐ High 136 136

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 136 136

Capacity Baseline 133 136

2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 137 141 144 144 144

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

Cap

acity profile (movements per hour)

LZBBCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions

Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to Slovak Republic for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Conclusion Applicable to VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT

ROUTING.

THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS.

(page 14 of the Report)

All State that are

implementing

AOM21.1 and

AOM21.2 State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES

Description of the planned action: Implementation of Direct Routing including respective ATM system upgrade

has been achieved according to the schedule. Preparation of Free Route Airspace introduction is underway and

is intended to be completed within the deadline.

Conclusion Applicable to ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY

CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) All States + EC

State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES

Description of the planned action: A state‐level task force has been set up with the purpose of an accelerated implementation of ADQ. National Regulator published the Guidance material for the relevant Data Originator´s

procedures. based on this guidance the full operation of web based application for all data chain is planned to

be launched by the end of the year 2018.


4. Implementation Projects

4.1. National projects

The main projects currently ongoing in Slovakia are depicted in the table below.

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:

Aeronautical Data Quality Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development (SK)

From: 2010 To: 2018 In progress. L3: INF07, ITY‐ADQ

Air‐ground radiocommunication system

Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik(SK)

From: 2014 To: 2018 In progress L3: ITY‐AGVCS2

Radar Sliač Ministry of Defence (SK) From: 2017 To: 2018 Planned L3: ITY‐SPI

Upgrade of the E2000 system Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik(SK)

From: 2015 To: 2019 In progress ‐

eTOD Ministry of Transport, Construction and Regional Development (SK)

From: 2008 To: 2018 The AREA 1 and AREA 4 data is available for both terrain and obstacles. AREA 2 terrain data is available. Database of obstacles AREA 2 is available and is continuously updated by REG and will be gradually send to ASP for dataset update. Area 3 not planned. Verification of the regulatory compliance of TOD implementation is planned.

L3: INF07, ITY‐ADQ


4.2. FAB projects

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links:

FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free Route Airspace Study) (FAB CE Project 1)

ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI)

Project 1: Start 3.1.2011, End: Continuous Project 1 FAB CE FRA Study: Start: 1.9.2015, End: 21.4.2017

FAB CE FRA Study is completed Other activities, including monitoring FRA implementation, are ongoing

L3: AOM21.1, AOM21.2

RP2 PP: FAB CE FRA Project (described under NSP actions 'FAB CE Airspace and route structure planning' and 'Free Route Airspace')

DP2016: 102AF3 – Free route airspace from the Black Forest to the Black Sea

FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace Management (DAM) and STAM (FAB CE DAM/STAM Study)


DAM/STAM Study: Start: 7.2.2017, End: 31.12.2018

Ongoing L3: AOM19.1, AOM19.2, AOM19.3, FCM04.1, FCM04.2, FCM05, FCM06

RP2 PP: Advanced Airspace Management (described under NSP actions)

DP2016: 2016_075_AF3_A

FAB CE wide Study of DAM and STAM (PCP under CEF2016 Call)

Surveillance Infrastructure Optimisation (FAB CE Project 18)


Start: 6.7.2016, End: 28.2.2018 Ongoing, in the finalization phase

RP2 PP: Optimisation of CNS resources


Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links:

X‐Bone HW Procurement (FAB CE Project 17)

ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik (SK), Slovenia Control (SI)

Start: 19.2.2016, End: 30.4.2018 Common procurement finalized, in the implementation phase

RP2 PP: Optimisation of CNS resources


4.3. Regional projects

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:

AMAN LOWW initial (AMAN LOWW initial)

ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik(SK)

Start: 2.1.2016 End: 31.12.2020

Ongoing L3: ATC07.1, ATC15.1 DP2016: 2015_234_AF1 AMAN LOWW initial RP2 PP: Project taken into account under 3.1.(c).(ii) ‐ Capacity KPI #2: Terminal and airport ANS ATFM arrival delay per flight

ANSPs cross‐border network (‐)

ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik(SK)

‐ HW upgrade and extension of X‐bone to Slovenia

‐ HW procured and delivered, installation ongoing

‐

Implementing RNP APCH Operations With EGNOS (IMPROWE)

Austrocontrol (AT), Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik(SK)

2015 ‐ 2018 Ongoing ‐

Synchronised PBN Implementation Cohesion Europe (SPICE)

Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik(SK)

2016 ‐ 2020 Ongoing ‐


5. Cooperation activities

5.1. FAB Co‐ordination

Having signed and ratified the Agreement on the Establishment of Functional Airspace Block Central Europe, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia are part of FAB CE.

The FAB CE States agreed on establishment of the following permanent bodies ‐ the FAB CE Council, NSA Coordination Committee and Joint Civil‐Military Airspace Coordination Committee. The FAB CE Council can also establish other bodies necessary for the implementation, operation and further development of the FAB CE Project. For this reason the FAB CE Legal Committee and the FAB CE Performance Body (responsible for preparation of FAB CE Performance Plan for RP2) have been established.

The air navigation service providers of the FAB CE countries established a joint company FABCE Aviation Services, Ltd already in 2014 and the company is responsible for the professional management of various regional air navigation projects. The establishment of this joint venture is not only effectively aiming at the progress of the FAB CE programme, but at the same time the Single European Sky programme of the European Union.

In 2016, there was a major update of the FAB CE Strategy. The FAB CE Strategic Objectives, defined in this version of the Strategy, cover the period until 2020, and address also the FAB CE long term strategic vision. This was followed by the update of the FAB CE High Level Plan which provides the link how the FAB CE intends to achieve full compliance with the Deployment Programme and achievement of all strategic goals through cooperation’s, projects and tasks. This is done by assessing existing gaps between the present state of implementation activities and the SESAR DP and by pointing towards activities and initiatives established to close those ‘gaps’ and reach achievement of all the high‐level targets. The High Level Plan is going through regular updates on an annual basis.

In addition to FAB CE projects, the FAB CE ANSPs coordinate also their regional Free Route Airspace initiatives including South Eastern Europe Night Free Route Airspace (SEEN FRA) involving Hungary and DANUBE FAB, SEAFRA (South‐East Axis Free Route Airspace) involving Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia and SAXFRA (Slovenian Austrian Cross Border Free Route Airspace). In 2017, the ANSPs worked hard on merging the SEAFRA and SAXFRA initiatives into the South East Common Sky Initiative Free Route Airspace (SECSI FRA) which has been successfully implemented, with the support of the Network Manager.

FAB CE continues to actively cooperate and share information and lessons learnt with other FABs. In 2017, FAB CE participated in a number of inter‐FAB workshops, including Inter‐FAB communications workshop in Langen, Inter‐FAB Point of Contact (PoC) workshop in Malta and Inter‐FAB operational workshop organised by FAB CE in Ljubljana. FAB CE also continues to coordinate its activities with other ANSPs of the Gate One initiative consisting of three FABs (Baltic FAB, DANUBE FAB and FAB CE) and two non‐EU ANSPs (MNAV and SMATSA).


5.2. Regional cooperation

Regional cooperation initiatives

LPS has been active in a regional cooperation platform Gate One. Gate One is a bottom up regional ANSP

initiative established in 2013. The purpose of the coordination platform, is to promote the efficiency of

European Air Traffic Management through enhanced cooperation among the participating service providers, as

well as to ensure a more powerful and coordinated advocacy of the region in the European decision‐making

processes. More information about the initiative can be found at www.gateone.aero


6. Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View

Overall Objective Implementation

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

Objectives AOM 19.2, AOM 19.3, AOM 21.2, ATC 02.9, ATC 12.1, COM 12, FCM 04.2, FCM 05, FCM 06, ITY‐ACID, ITY‐SPI, NAV 03.1 are planned to be completed until or well before the set deadline.

Implementation of the objective COM 11 was planned; however the VoIP functionality will not be fully operational until 1‐2 years after the set implementation date.

Objective 19.1 is to be finished by June 2018 and is closely linked to a FAB CE project.

As regards the objective INF 07 national TOD policy was established in Annex 1 of national regulation L 15 (national implementation of ICAO Annex 15). Working group has also been established to facilitate implementation of TOD/ADQ policy before the deadline in 2018.

Implementation of the objective FCM 03 will be delayed due to delayed upgrade of the ATM system.

A task force for the implementation of the EC regulation 73/2010 was set up in 2010. Finalization of the implementation of the ITY‐ADQ objective is due in 2018, one year after the planned deadline.

Implementation of ITY‐AGDL will be slightly delayed due to wider ATM system upgrade to take place by then.

Delay in full implementation of ITY‐AGVCS2 was caused by unexpected extension of the period needed for procurement of required radios. Full implementation is foreseen for 2020.

Current level of implementation of the objective NAV10 is at 98%. There is only one airport where RNP approach has already been implemented, however publication in AIP is still pending. It planned for February 2018.

10; 25%

11; 27%7; 17%

6; 15%

3; 8%

3; 8%

Completed

Ongoing

Planned

Late

No Plan

Not Applicable

Missing Data

Undefined


Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature

Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C.

Legend:

## % = Expected completion / % Progress = ESSIP Timeline (different colour per KF)

100% = Objective Completed = Completion beyond ESSIP Timeline


<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

0%

-

AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA 62%

AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data 0%

AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing

0%

FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services 100%

FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 32%

FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1

n/a

FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 3%

FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP 0%

FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment 0%


Advanced Air Traffic Services

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM21.1 (PCP)

Direct Routing 100%

AOM21.2 (PCP)

Free Route Airspace 5%

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Local objective

AOP14 *

ATC02.2 STCA En‐Route 100%

ATC02.8 Ground‐Based Safety Nets 100%

ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs 3%

ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures

LZIB ‐ Bratislava Airport (Outside Applicability Area)

n/a

ATC12.1

Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring

48%

ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN

n/a

ATC15.2 (PCP)

Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace

n/a

ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1

100%

ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

n/a

ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T

Local objective

n/a

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations


n/a

ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations

Local objective

LZIB ‐ Bratislava Airport 0%

LZKZ ‐ KOSICE 0%

LZPP ‐ PIESTANY 0%

LZTT ‐ POPRAD‐TATRY 10%

LZZI ‐ ZILINA 25%

ITY‐COTR Ground‐Ground Automated Co‐ordination Processes

100%

NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 10%

NAV03.2 (PCP)

RNP 1 in TMA Operations

n/a

NAV10 APV procedures 98%

NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft

Local objective 0%

-


High Performing Airport Operations

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1


n/a

AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2


n/a

AOP05 Airport CDM


n/a

AOP10 (PCP) Time‐Based Separation


n/a

AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan


- 0%

AOP12 (PCP) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring


n/a

AOP13 (PCP) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing


n/a

ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management


n/a

SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions

100%



<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 100%

COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 10%

COM12 (PCP) NewPENS 8%

FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 0%

-

INF04 Integrated Briefing 100%

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 85%

ITY‐ACID Aircraft Identification 96%

ITY‐ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information

76%

ITY‐AGDL Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services 14%

ITY‐AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195

24%

ITY‐FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100%

ITY‐SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 64%


ICAO ASBU Implementation

The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.

These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).

Legend:

= Completed (during 2017 or before)

= Missing planning date

= Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance

100%

54%

B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2)

B0‐FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground‐Ground Integration

100%

B0‐DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management

100%

88%

B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%

B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets

100%

52%

B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through

B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)

B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories

100%

87%

B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network‐Wide view

100%

66%

B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%

64%

B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)

B0‐TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En‐Route

100%

14%


6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress

Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C.

Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

Completed No Plan

Ongoing Not Applicable

Planned Missing Data

Late


Main Objectives

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

0% No Plan

‐

Conclusion (on state level) about implementation of EUROAT has not been adopted. If any progress is achieved in 2018, the objective shall be updated in the next year edition of LSSIP. GAT/OAT procedures applied under ICAO rules, implemented in the LoAs for civil/military coordination.

‐

REG (By:12/2018)

Military Aviation Authority

‐ ‐ 0% No Plan

‐

ASP (By:12/2018)


‐ ‐ 0% No Plan

‐

Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, štátny podnik

Conclusion (on state level) about implementation of EUROAT has not been adopted. If any progress is achieved in 2018 LPS SR will start with implementation.

‐ 0%

No Plan

‐

MIL (By:12/2018)

Slovak Air Force

‐ ‐ 0% No Plan

‐


‐ ‐ 0% No Plan

‐

AOM19.1

ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

62% Ongoing

‐

Initial basic steps implemented; next activities will be finished by June 2018. Waiting for NMF and implementation of FAB CE. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

Slovak Air Force

‐ ‐ 88% Ongoing

31/12/2018


Initial basic steps implemented; next activities will be finished by June 2018.

FAB CE‐wide Study of Dynamic Airspace

Management (DAM) and

STAM

62%

Ongoing

31/12/2018


AOM19.2

ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Activities will start after full LARA implementation.



STAM

0%

Planned

31/12/2021

AOM19.3

Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Activities will start after full LARA implementation.



STAM

0%

Planned

31/12/2021

AOM21.1

Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed

‐

Implementation of Direct Routing procedures/processes including the ANSP system upgrade and implementation of the transversal activities were implemented in compliance with the schedule. Objective was implemented in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5.

28/04/2016

ASP (By:12/2017)


Implementation of Direct Routing procedures/processes completed in compliance with the schedule.

FAB CE Strategic

Operational Planning

Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free

Route Airspace Study)

100%

Completed

28/04/2016


AOM21.2

Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

5% Ongoing

‐

Free Route Airspace implementation strategy is planned for the purpose of better airspace utilisation and enhance productivity and reduce controller workload. Objective is planned in the context of FAB CE projects see details in Chapter 5.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Free Route Airspace implementation will follow successful introduction of Direct Routing.

FAB CE Strategic

Operational Planning

Project (incl. FAB CE X‐Border Free

Route Airspace Study)

5%

Ongoing

31/12/2021

AOP04.1

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective. ‐

REG (By:12/2010)

ASP (By:12/2011)


Not Applicable. Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2010)

Letisko M. R. Štefánika ‐ Airport Bratislava, a. s. (BTS)


‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


AOP04.2

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable



ASP (By:12/2017)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2017)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable



ASP (By:12/2016)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


AOP10 Time‐Based Separation Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable



REG (By:12/2023)

Transport Authority

‐ ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)



‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

0% No Plan


Just at the beginning of the objective. Familiarization and initial cooperation between stakeholders has been started aimed to plan and fulfill respective lines of action.

‐

ASP (By:12/2021)


Just at the beginning of the objective. Familiarization process has been started aimed to identify required information and set up a process ensuring finalisation criteria AOP11‐ASP01 1).

‐ 0%

No Plan

‐

APO (By:12/2021)


Just at the beginning of the objective. Scoping and familiarization process has been started aiming to identify the necessary information to set up a process of evaluation.

‐ 0%

No Plan

‐


AOP12

Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable



ASP (By:12/2020)


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2020)


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective. APO is not a PCP Airport.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

AOP13

Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


Out of applicability area. ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

Transport Authority

Out of applicability area. ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)


Out of applicability area. ‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


ATC02.8

Ground‐Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

100% Completed

‐

APW and MSAW Level 2 have been implemented in the ATM system. APM Level 1 is not implemented.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

Slovak Air Force

Only for Sliač Airport is implemented. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2016


APW and MSAW Level 2 have been implemented in the ATM system. APM Level 1 is not implemented.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2016

ATC02.9

Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

3% Ongoing

‐

‐ 31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2020)


STCA in TMA LZIB is operational. Project for implementation of STCA in TMA LZKZ and TMA LZTT is initiated and it is planned to be completed in 2018.

‐ 3%

Ongoing

31/12/2019

ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


Traffic does not justify automation. ‐

ASP (By:12/2019)


Traffic does not justify automation. AMAN LOWW initial

%

Not Applicable

‐


ATC12.1

Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

48% Ongoing

‐

Pre‐caution tool (Extended STCA) and Separation tool as TCT functions have been implemented and others (MTCD, Conflict Resolution and MONA) are planned and will be implemented as part of upgrade of the ATM system.

05/02/2019

ASP (By:12/2021)


Pre‐caution tool (Extended STCA) and Separation tool as TCT functions have been implemented and others will be as part of upgrade of the ATM system.

‐ 48%

Ongoing

05/02/2019

ATC15.1

Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable

‐

The national ASP´s ATM system supports the information exchange for this objective. Project for integration with AMAN at Vienna Airport is ongoing.

‐

ASP (By:12/2017)


The ATM system supports the information exchange for this objective. Project for integration with AMAN LOWW is ongoing.

AMAN LOWW initial

%

Not Applicable

‐

ATC15.2

Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

% Not

Applicable

‐

National ASP is ready to participate, for the time being there is no request from neighbouring units to apply extended AMAN within en‐route sectors.

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)


LPS SR is ready to participate, for the time being there is no request from neighbouring units to apply extended AMAN within en‐route sectors.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable

‐

Slovakia is out of applicability area. The use of this objective is being discussed at FAB CE level. Currently only preliminary plans exist.

‐

ASP (By:12/2018)

Slovak Air Force

Slovakia is out of applicability area. Moreover, MIL is considered as low level stakeholder.

‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


The use of this objective is being discussed at FAB CE level. Currently only preliminary plans exist.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

100% Completed

‐

The National ASP had implemented Basic ATSMHS capability and gateway facilities to AFTN in 2008. Migration of the international CIDIN circuits to AMHS started with COM centres in Vienna and Budapest. AMHS connections to other centres like Madrid, Warsaw, Zagreb have been implemented and other will follow.

31/12/2014

ASP (By:12/2018)


LPS SR had implemented required infrastructure in 2008 already and is prepared for AMHS transfer. Tests with COM centres in Vienna, Budapest and Prague have been performed. Military will be connected to the AFTN/AMHS through the ASP.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

Slovak Air Force

MIL is in position of AFTN client from LPS SR. Development of own ATS Messaging Management will include support of AMHS capability.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2008


COM11

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

10% Late

‐

The future change is under evaluation and preparation. 31/12/2022

ASP (By:12/2020)

Slovak Air Force

MIL Voice Communication Systems to support VoIP and Provider of military communication network are not ED137 compatible. Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in MIL ATM is planned to procure till 2019.

‐ 10%

Ongoing

31/12/2020


VoIP pilot project is in progress but in delay to be concluded in 2018/2019.

‐ 10%

Late

31/12/2022

COM12

New Pan‐European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020

8% Ongoing

‐

The national ASP plan to migrate to the NewPENS in line with its initial plan and have already started with preparation. Moreover LPS SR participates actively to Transition Working Group. Military and Bratislava Airport will consider their participation in cooperation with LPS SR in later stage.

30/11/2019

ASP (By:12/2024)

Slovak Air Force

If necessary, solution via ANSP will be possible. ‐ 0% No Plan

‐


Ongoing internal activities related to new HW and its implementation, planning of migration, new contract signature, etc. Active cooperation in NewPENS activities (co‐financed via SDM/INEA).

‐ 10%

Ongoing

30/11/2019

APO (By:12/2024)


‐ ‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


Density of traffic allows to apply CDO techniques most of the time (no restrictions by ATC). General information regarding the application of CDO has been published in national AIP (LZIB AD 2.21.3.3). ATCOs have been trained accordingly (phraseology, provide distance‐to‐go information).

‐

ASP (By:12/2013)


Density of traffic allows to apply CDO techniques most of the time (no restrictions by ATC). General information regarding the application of CDO has been published in national AIP (LZIB AD 2.21.3.3). ATCOs have been trained accordingly (phraseology, provide distance‐to‐go information).

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2013)


See ASP comment. ‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable



ASP (By:12/2016)


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016)


Traffic density does not justify implementation of the Objective. The objective will be further monitored and implemented when reasonable.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


FCM03

Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

32% Late

‐

Upgrade of local ATM system has been initiated. 31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2017)


Upgrade of local ATM system has been initiated. ‐ 32%

Late

31/12/2018

FCM04.1

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable

‐

Although FAB CE States are not in the initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed as part of FAB CE P3 and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September 2015. Live Trial was used to explore and verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. After assessing the results and recommendations coming from the FAB CE STAM LT, FAB CE OPS SC has decided to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE. Implementation is planned for 27. April 2017. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

‐

ASP (By:10/2017)


The initial applicability area for STAM Phase 1 implementation, FAB CE STAM Working Group was formed and tasked with a STAM Live Trial, which was executed in September 2015. Live Trial was used to verify the possibility to introduce the application of STAM Phase 1 in FABCE area. After assessing the results and recommendations coming from the FAB CE STAM LT, FAB CE OPS SC has decided to proceed with STAM Phase 1 implementation in FABCE.



STAM

100%

Completed

31/12/2017


FCM04.2

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

3% Ongoing

‐

Initial actions have started as part of FAB CE DAM/STAM Project (ex. P3). STAM Phase 2 will be implemented with the availability of this function in the N‐connect Tool, planned for implementation end of 2018. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Initial actions have started as part of FAB CE DAM/STAM Project (ex. P3). STAM Phase 2 will be implemented with the availability of this function in the N‐connect Tool, planned for implementation end of 2018. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.



STAM

3%

Ongoing

31/12/2021

FCM05

Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Implementation of interactive rolling NOP is planned through upgrade of the automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM and Perform an integration of the automated ASM support systems with the Network. All these projects will be fulfilled in accordance with the NM support, the guidance and the relevant provisions of the NM B2B Reference Manuals. Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

30/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Planned in 2021



STAM

0%

Planned

30/12/2021

APO (By:12/2021)


Airport Bratislava is not IATA Level 3 Slot Coordinated airport yet. With the change of the coordination level this SLoA will be revaluated.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


FCM06

Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Implementation of Traffic Complexity Assessment tool is planned to be implemented in line with the ASP Capacity Plan. At FAB CE level several options are discussed on whether ANSP will procure a ready‐made Complexity Assessment Tool, or will commit to develop such a tool using own resources. One solution is being discussed on the possibility to have a common FAB CE Complexity Tool, more details will be available end 02/2017. Initial actions have been made, with advanced use of CHMI functions (Associated Flows etc). Objective is linked with one of the FAB CE projects ‐ see details in Chapter 5 of Level 1 document.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)


Traffic Complexity Assessment is foreseen as a tool for better utilization of traffic capacity of the Slovak airspace. Implementation of this tool is in line with the capacity plan of the LPS SR.



STAM

0%

Planned

31/12/2021

FCM08

Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% No Plan

‐

Implementation is currently under study. ‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

Slovak Air Force

‐ ‐ 0% No Plan

‐


‐ ‐ 0%

No Plan

‐


INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018

85% Ongoing

‐

National TOD policy is established in Annex 1 of national regulation L 15 (national implementation of ICAO Annex 15). Working group has been established to facilitate implementation of TOD/ADQ policy. The AREA 1 and AREA 4 data is available for both terrain and obstacles. AREA 2 terrain data is available. Database of obstacles AREA 2 is available and is continuously updated by REG. Verification of the regulatory compliance of TOD implementation is planned.

31/05/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

Transport Authority

Database of obstacles in AREA 1, AREA 2 is available and is continuously updated.

‐ 85% Ongoing

31/05/2018

ASP (By:05/2018)


The AREA 1 and AREA 2 terrain data is available. Information for stakeholders how to access data is published in AIP.

‐ 100%

Completed

12/11/2015

APO (By:05/2018)


APO is part of the established Working group, which aims to facilitate implementation of TOD/ADQ. Based on the outcomes of the group a roadmap will be developed in conformity with the National TOD implementation plan.

‐ 70%

Ongoing

31/05/2018

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft Identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020

96% Ongoing

‐

All systems were upgraded to be capable to process ACID data. MIL plan to upgrade their system at Sliač Airport with very low traffic by 01/2020. In this case MIL is considered as "Low key Stakeholder" because there is no impact on overall performance of Slovak ATM system.

02/01/2020

ASP (By:01/2020)

Slovak Air Force

MIL sensors operate with mode 3/A/C (upgrade to Mod‐S planned with acquisition new sensors). ATM surveillance system is ready to share ACID data from civilian sensors.

‐ 92%

Ongoing

02/01/2020


Upgrades of the main and back‐up ATM systems were concluded by 1Q/2015.

‐ 100%

Completed

30/04/2015


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

76% Late

‐

The Task Force for the implementation of the EC Regulation No 73/2010 was established at the State level in 2010. Members are specialists from MoT, NSA, ANSP and from all relevant data originator´s organisations. The Task Force works in the frame of approved Terms of Reference and the Project Management Plan. Web based application for all data chain is final stage of implementation.

31/12/2018

REG (By:06/2017)

Transport Authority

Data collection procedures, IT security specialists and relevant data originators are actively involved in the Task Force (see State Comment) activities.

‐ 70% Late

31/12/2018

ASP (By:06/2017)


AIM, procedure designers, IT security specialists and relevant data originators are actively involved in the Task Force (see State Comment) activities. Web based application for all data chain has been installed. The new procedures are being developed and the configuration of the application is under development in close cooperation with all relevant data originators.

‐ 80%

Late

31/07/2018

APO (By:06/2017)


Data collection procedures, IT security specialists and relevant data originators are actively involved in the Task Force (see State and ASP Comments). There will be further activities induced once the AIS Web Portal will be ready.

‐ 75%

Late

31/12/2018


ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

14% Late

‐

Common project for AGDL seamless operations is under consideration in accordance with the SDM Recovery Plan.

31/12/2020

REG (By:02/2018)

Transport Authority

Actions will be completed in line with ASP implementation plans.

‐ 33% Late

05/02/2019

ASP (By:02/2018)


Project at LPS SR started. ‐ 5%

Late

31/12/2020

MIL (By:01/2019)

Slovak Air Force

CPDL will not be implemented on the military transport‐type aircraft.

‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

Ministry of Defence

MIL has not planned yet to implement SES Data Link Services above FL 285 neither Equip transport‐type State aircraft.

‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


ITY‐AGVCS2

8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

24% Late

‐

Activities related to extension of 8,33 channel spacing below FL 195 are in progress. 31/12/2020

REG (By:12/2018)


Aircraft and CNS equipment has been partially upgraded concerning 8,33 kHz channel spacing capability. All procedures are planned to be accomplished according to requirements.

‐ 10%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

Transport Authority

‐ ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2018)

Slovak Air Force

Aircraft and CNS equipment has been partially upgraded concerning 8,33 kHz channel spacing capability. All procedures are planned to be accomplished according to requirements.

‐ 8%

Ongoing

31/12/2018


Activities related to extension of 8,33 channel spacing below FL 195 are in progress, although procurement of new radios took much longer than expected. Upgrade plan for renewal of ground radio station includes radio sites operated for ACC Bratislava and APP/TWR ‐ Štefánik which physical installation is expected to be completed by 12/2018. Approval process shifts conversion of 2 frequencies beyond deadline into March 2019. All remaining radio sites for ACC Bratislava and other Slovak airports (LZKZ, LZTT, LZZI and LZPP) will re‐use existing 8,33 radios.

Air‐ground radiocommunication system

25%

Late

31/03/2019

MIL (By:12/2020)

Slovak Air Force

All aircraft have been equipped at least one 8,33 kHz capable radio on the board. There is no plan to implement additional radio. There is still need to procure and deploy ground 8,33 kHz capable radios. SVK AF doesn't have sufficient numbers to fully accept regulation.

‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2020

Ministry of Defence

All aircraft have been equipped at least one 8,33 kHz capable radio on the board. There is no plan to implement additional radio. There is still need to procure and deploy ground 8,33 kHz capable radios. SVK AF doesn't have sufficient numbers to fully accept regulation.

‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2020

APO (By:12/2018)


The implementation projects are planned to be accomplished according to the requirements (at Bratislava Airport).

‐ 10%

Ongoing

31/12/2018


ITY‐FMTP

Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

100% Completed

‐

The national ASP is IPv6 compliant. Connected already to Prague, Budapest, Vienna and Warszawa. Awaiting Lviv to migrate for full implementation.

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2014)


ATM systems have been interconnected between Prague, Budapest, Vienna and Warszwa. Awaiting Lviv to migrate for full implementation.

‐ 100%

Completed

30/04/2012

MIL (By:12/2014)

Slovak Air Force

Common ATM system is used for the Civil ‐ Military coordination.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012


ITY‐SPI

Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

64% Ongoing

‐

Plan related to safety assessment of the existing surveillance infrastructure has been proposed. NSA is capable to conduct safety oversight.

07/06/2020

REG (By:02/2015)

Transport Authority

NSA is capable to conduct safety oversight. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012

ASP (By:02/2015)


The safety assessment documentation was prepared during SDP system upgrade and it was delivered to NSA.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014

MIL (By:06/2020)

Slovak Air Force

The transport aircraft are equipped with Mode S Elementary Surveillance. Equipment of the fighter aircraft is not Mode S capable. Mode S Enhanced Surveillance and ADS‐B Out avionics are planned only for new aircraft.

‐ 3%

Ongoing

07/06/2020


The transport aircraft are equipped with Mode S Elementary Surveillance. Equipment of the fighter aircraft is under review. Mode S Enhanced Surveillance and ADS‐B Out avionics are planned only for new aircraft.

‐ 3%

Ongoing

07/06/2020

NAV03.1

RNAV 1 in TMA Operations (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

10% Ongoing

‐

Implementation of RNAV SIDs/STARs within TMAs served for major airports and deployment of DMEs to support RNAV operations has been started and is planned to be completed by the end of 2020.

30/10/2020

ASP (By:12/2023)


Implementation of RNAV SIDs/STARs within TMAs served for LZIB, LZPP, LZZI, LZTT and LZKZ and deployment of DMEs to support RNAV operations has been started and is planned to be completed by the end of 2020.

‐ 10%

Ongoing

30/10/2020


NAV03.2

RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

% Not

Applicable

‐

Implementation of RNP 1 operations with radius to fix is not applicable for the time being. ‐

ASP (By:12/2023)


Implementation of RNP 1 operations with radius to fix is not applicable for the time being.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

NAV10

APV Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

98% Late

‐

Implementation of RNP approaches at LZIB, LZKZ, LZPP, LZZI completed. RNP approaches at the last airport, where LPS SR provides ATS (LZTT) is completed and publication in AIP is planned for 15 FEB 18.

15/02/2018

REG (By:04/2016)

Transport Authority

National regulatory material for APV procedures based on EASA AMC 20‐27 and EASA AMC 20‐28 has been published via AIC A 4/14 30 OCT 2014.

‐ 100% Completed

30/04/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)


Implementation of RNP approaches at LZIB, LZKZ, LZPP, LZZI completed. Publication of RNP approaches at the last airport, where LPS SR provides ATS (LZTT) is planned for 15 FEB 18.

‐ 98%

Late

15/02/2018


SAF11

Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018

100% Completed

‐

Measures will be implemented according to European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions.

31/12/2015

REG (By:01/2018)


Appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions were implemented.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

Transport Authority

Measures will be implemented according to European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

Slovak Air Force

The applicable measures of the Action Plan have been implemented.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015


The applicable measures of the Action Plan have been implemented.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2014)


All activities from European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions, parts 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 are in place. A need for implementation of 3.2.9 was not recognized for the period of next 2 years.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2015


Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013

100% Completed

‐

Full completion done in 2011. 31/12/2011

ASP (By:01/2013)


Completed in 2011. ‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2011

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

100% Completed

‐

MoT SK is confident with implementation ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1. The current MIL aircraft are out of criteria. There is plan to buy new ones. MIL is considered as "Low key Stakeholder" because in this case there is no impact on overall performance of Slovak ATM system.

31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

Transport Authority

Transport Authority met the requirements of Reg. 1332/2011.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)


Completed. ‐ 100%

Completed

30/06/2011

MIL (By:12/2015)


Planned for new aircraft. Current aircraft are out of criteria. There is plan to buy new ones at about end of 2020.

‐ 100% No Plan

‐


FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006

100% Completed

‐

Completed in 2004. (Note: some SLoAs are not applicable since the traffic does not justify automation.)

31/12/2004

ASP (By:07/2014)


Completed in 2004. (Note: some SLoAs are not applicable since the traffic does not justify automation.)

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2004

INF04

Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

Integrated briefing project has been implemented. The application IBAF is running under LPS SR responsibility together with the coordination of the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMU).

31/12/2010

ASP (By:12/2012)

Slovak Air Force

Integrated briefing project has been implemented. The application IBAF is running under LPS SR responsibility together with the coordination of the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMU). Integrated briefing function at Sliač Airport is provided based on the agreement between MoD and LPS SR.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2010


Integrated briefing project has been implemented. The application IBAF is running under LPS SR responsibility together with the coordination of the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHU) and according to agreement between MoD and LPS SR. All criteria detailed in SloA descriptions have been implemented as follows: Integrated briefing function has been implemented with the following conditions accomplished: ‐ Facilities and services with one final application at one terminal; ‐ One single entry of flight details; ‐ All briefing products combined into a single package that may be tailored by request of the user.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2010


ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

The services related to COTR are implemented. 31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2012)


‐ ‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2015

MIL (By:12/2012)

Slovak Air Force

CIV MIL coordination is performed by means of common system. There is no intention yet to implement OLDI between civil and military coordination. Flight data exchange systems supporting the coordination procedures between air traffic services units and controlling military units, which operates their own system.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2012


CIV MIL coordination is performed by means of common system. There is no intention yet to implement OLDI between civil and military coordination. Flight data exchange systems supporting the coordination procedures between air traffic services units and controlling military units, which operates their own system.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2012


Local Objectives

ATC18 Multi‐Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local

% Not

Applicable

‐

The MSP concept is considered as Not Applicable for the Slovak Republic. ‐

ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local

0% Planned

LZIB ‐ Bratislava Airport

Developing and implementation of RNAV SIDs and STARs under the project SPICE (INEA CEF) 31/12/2020


0% Planned

LZKZ ‐ KOSICE



0% Planned

LZPP ‐ PIESTANY



10% Ongoing

LZTT ‐ POPRAD‐TATRY



25% Ongoing

LZZI ‐ ZILINA


NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Applicability and timescale: Local

% No Plan

‐

National ASP has considered introduction of Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes, however due to insufficient demand by end users there is no plan for the time being.

‐

Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.


ANNEXES

ANNEX A ‐ Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co‐ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP National Focal Point for Slovak Republic

LPS SR, š. p. Augustín LAMPRECHT

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA MoT TA

Zdenko BLAŠKO Vojtech ŠPROCH

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP LPS SR, š. p. Tomas ŠPAVELKO

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Airport Bratislava Gabriel DOMŠITZ

LSSIP Focal Point for Military MoD Zdenek BAŠKA

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person for Slovak Republic DPS/PEPR Agnieszka DYBOWSKA


Implementation Objectives

Implementation Objective

EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners

National Stakeholder Specialist

AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR TA: Ján SOKOL MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

AOM19.1 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /

O. MROWICKI

LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA


O. MROWICKI



O. MROWICKI


AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA

AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ TA: Ján SOKOL

AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM N/A

AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ TA: Ján SOKOL

AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ TA: Vojtech ŠPROCH

ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK

ATC07.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián BABEĽA



ATC15.2 L. DELL’ORTO P. HOP LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO S. MORTON LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

ATC18 L. DELL’ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR MIL: Marián BABEĽA

COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián IHNÁT


COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY LPS SR: Martin NOSÁĽ AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

ENV03 A‐P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN LPS SR: Rastislav PRIMUS

FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI

LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Eduard PANÁČEK

FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR

FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR MIL: Eduard PANÁČEK

FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI


FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI LPS SR: Radoslav KUČÁR MIL: Marián BABEĽA

FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Marián BABEĽA

INF07 A‐P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY LPS SR: Tomáš FLASSIK TA: Miloš HUPKA MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

ITY‐ACID O. CIOARA pending LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

ITY‐ADQ A‐P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER

TA: Martina CHIBEĽOVÁ LPS SR: Andrej PENER MIL: Zdenek BAŠKA AD BTS: Gabriel DOMŠITZ

ITY‐AGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Miron MIŠANIČ MIL: Marián IHNÁT

ATY‐AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Miron MIŠANIČ MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

ITY‐FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK MIL: Slavomír ZÁMEČNÍK

ITY‐SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY LPS SR: Ján BURŠÍK TA: Ľubomír SOBOLIČ MIL: Marián IHNÁT

NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC LPS SR:Rastislav PRIMUS

NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC LPS SR: Rastislav PRIMUS

NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH LPS SR: Rastislav PRIMUS

TA: Jaroslav ŠULC MIL: Eduard PANÁČEK

NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET LPS SR: Rastislav PRIMUS

SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending LPS SR: Ivan SELNEKOVIČ

TA: Jozef TÓTH MIL: Ján SALAJ


ANNEX B ‐ National Stakeholders Organisation charts


Transport Authority – Civil Aviation Division Organization Chart


Organizational chart of Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej republiky, š. p.

Finance Division(DEKS)

ATM/ CNS Infrastructure Division

(DTZL)

Division of Internal Administration

(DVNS)

Air Traffic Management (ATM)

Division(DATM)

Division of Development and

Support of HR(DHR)

Secretary of departments

Director

Secretary

CEO

Secretary

Secretary

Secretary

Director Director Director

CEO Office

Secretary

Director Director

Aeronautical Information

Management Division(DAIM)

Safety Department(SAF)

Director Head of Safety

Support and Strategy Division

(DPS)

Director

Rescue Coordination Centre(RCC)

Director

SecretarySecretary Secretary

Accounting department

APP/TWR Košice units

TWR Tatry unit

TWR Žilina unit

ATM planning and procedures department

Central Air Traffic Services Reporting

Office (CARO)

Crisis Management Department

Department of Internal Structure and Processes

Legal Department

Department of Procurement

Employment Relations and Payroll Department

Human Resources Development Department

Department of Planning, Strategy and Project

Management

Department of International AffairsDepartment of Internal

Investigation, Safety Survey and Monitoring

Department of Safety Assessment and

Analysis

Department of International NOTAM

Office (NOF)

Department of Aeronautical Information

and Publication

Occupational Health and Safety and Fire Prevention Unit

Archive, Registry and Filing Office Unit

AIM Systems Department

AIM Metodology Office

Instrument flight procedures (IFP)

department

Training Centre

ACC Bratislava unit

APP/TWR Štefánik units

Services and Supplies Department

Facility Management Department

Special-purpose facility Banská Štiavnica

Recreational facility Stará Lesná

Recovery, educational and recreational

centre Rajecké Teplice

Economic management of Košice and Poprad

airports

Systems Operation Department

Infrastructure Development,

Methodology and Projects Department

ATM System Software Development Department

Research and Development Department

Department of technical economics

Security Department

Information System Operation Department

Planning and Sales Unit

Secretary


ANNEX C – Implementation Objectives’ Applicability

Objective SESAR

Key Feature

ICAO ASBU

B0 European ATM Masterplan Level 3 Applicability area

AOM13.1

‐ All ECAC States except Albania, Latvia, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and

Moldova.

AOM19.1

B0‐FRTO All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Malta, Luxembourg, and

Moldova

AOM19.2

‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova

AOM19.3

‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova

AOM21.1

B0‐FRTO 25 ECAC States

AOM21.2

‐ All ECAC States except Azerbaijan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the

Netherlands

AOP04.1

B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports

AOP04.2

B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports

AOP05

B0‐ACDM 25 PCP airports, 21 non‐PCP airports

AOP10

‐ 16 PCP Airports

AOP11

‐ 24 PCP airports, 15 non‐PCP airports

AOP12

‐ 25 PCP airports

AOP13

‐ 25 PCP airports

AOP14

‐ Local: Low to medium complexity aerodromes, subject to local needs

ATC02.2 B0‐SNET Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all ECAC States that did

not yet implement it

ATC02.8

B0‐SNET All ECAC States except the Netherlands

ATC02.9

B0‐SNET TMAs, according to local business needs

ATC07.1

B0‐RSEQ 23 PCP Airports, 8 non‐PCP airports

ATC12.1

‐ All ECAC States except Luxembourg

ATC15.1

B0‐RSEQ

EU States except Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovak

Republic, Slovenia. Plus: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maastricht UAC,

Norway, Switzerland, Turkey

ATC15.2

‐ ACCs within the extended AMAN horizon, including those adjacent to

TMAs serving/associated to PCP airports

ATC16 B0‐ACAS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that

did not yet implement it

ATC17

B0‐FICE All ECAC States except Ireland, Slovak Republic and Ukraine

ATC18

‐ Local: Subject to local needs and complexity

COM10

‐ All ECAC States

COM11

‐ All ECAC States


COM12

‐

‐ Area 1 (ANSPs signatories of the NewPENS Common Procurement

Agreement): 33 ANSPs

‐ Area 2 (Other stakeholders): Stakeholders from all ECAC States not part

of Area 1

ENV01

B0‐CDO 59 Airports

ENV02

‐ 47 Airports

ENV03

B0‐CCO Local: Aerodromes subject to local needs and complexity

FCM01 B0‐NOPS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that


FCM03

B0‐NOPS All ECAC States

FCM04.1

B0‐NOPS Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland,

Spain, Switzerland

FCM04.2

B0‐NOPS All EU+ States

FCM05

B0‐NOPS All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC

and Moldova

FCM06

B0‐NOPS All EU+ States

FCM07

‐ All EU+ States

FCM08

‐ All ECAC States

FCM09

‐ All ECAC States

INF04 B0‐DATM Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that


INF07

‐ All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC

INF08.1

‐ All EU+ States

INF08.2

‐ All EU+ States

ITY‐ACID

‐ All EU+ States

ITY‐ADQ

B0‐DATM All EU+ States except FYROM, Georgia and Maastricht UAC

ITY‐AGDL

B0‐TBO All EU+ States except Georgia, Luxembourg and Netherlands

ITY‐AGVCS2

‐ All EU+ States except Georgia and Moldova

ITY‐COTR B0‐FICE Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all EU+ States that did

not yet implement it

ITY‐FMTP

B0‐FICE All ECAC States

ITY‐SPI

B0‐ASUR All EU+ States

NAV03.1

B0‐CDO,

B0‐CCO All ECAC States except Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Slovak Republic

NAV03.2

‐ Mandatory for TMAs listed in section 1.2.1 of the Annex of the PCP

Regulation. For all other ECAC TMAs, according to local business needs

NAV10

B0‐APTA All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC

NAV12

‐ Local: TMAs subject to local needs and complexity

SAF11

‐ All ECAC States except Malta


Legend:

Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:


High Performing Airport Operations

Advanced Air Traffic Services



ANNEX D ‐ Glossary of Abbreviations

This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Slovak Republic.

Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

Term Description

AF ATM Functionality

FT Fast Track

PCP Pilot Common Project

PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme

S‐AF Sub ATM Functionality

Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - SLOVAKIA

Documents

Transcript of Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - SLOVAKIA