AEIS 2010-11[Our School District]

Accountability Standards 2011

Math

Academically Acceptable Recognized Exemplary

Reading

Science

Social Studies

Writing

80

80

80

80

80

90

90

90

90

90

70

65

60

70

70

Dropout RateGrades 7-8

Completion RateGrades 9-12

Other Indicators Evaluated

Standard = 75% Standard = 1.6%

Possible Ratings

Exemplary

Recognized

Academically Acceptable

Academically Unacceptable

23

1

Accessing the AEIS Report

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/

[Insert District Website Link]

Campus Libraries or Offices

2011 AEIS Report OverviewSection I – District/Campus Performance

• TAKS Performance/Participation–Disaggregated by grade level and student group

• Attendance & Annual Dropout Rate• Completion Rate• College Readiness Indicators– Advanced Courses/Dual Enrollment, RHSP and DAP

Graduates, AP/IB Results, Higher Education Readiness Component (HERC), SAT/ACT Results, College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2010)

2011 AEIS Report OverviewSection II – District/Campus Profile

• Student Information– Demographics, Retention Rates, Class Size

• Staff Information– Demographics, Experience, Salary Information

• Budget– Revenues and Expenditures

• Programs – Student Enrollment, Teachers by Program

2011 AEIS Report OverviewSection III – LEP Performance, District Only

• TAKS % Met Standard by BE/ESL Indicator• Student Success Initiative• Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers

GR 3 GR 4 GR 5 GR 6 GR 7 GR 8 GR 9 GR 10 GR 110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

AllAf AmHispWhiteEco DisSp EdLEP

2011 TAKS Performance Reading/English Language Arts – 70%/80%/90%

GR 4 GR 70

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

AllAf AmHispWhiteEco DisSp EdLEP

2011 TAKS Performance Writing – 70%/80%/90%

GR 3 GR 4 GR 5 GR 6 GR 7 GR 8 GR 9 GR 10 GR 110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

AllAf AmHispWhiteEco DisSp EdLEP

2011 TAKS Performance Mathematics – 65%/80%/90%

GR 5 GR 8 GR 10 GR 110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

AllAf AmHispWhiteEco DisSp EdLEP

2011 TAKS Performance Science – 60%/80%/90%

GR 8 GR 10 GR 110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

AllAf AmHispWhiteEco DisSp EdLEP

2011 TAKS Performance Social Studies – 70%/80%/90%

District Campus 1 Campus 2 Campus 3 Campus 40

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

AllAf AmHispWhiteEco Dis

2011 Attendance2009-2010 School Year

District Campus 1 Campus 2 Campus 3 Campus 40

1

2

3

4

5

6

AllAf AmHispWhiteEco Dis

2011 Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-8)2009-2010 School Year

District Campus 1 Campus 2 Campus 3 Campus 40

1

2

3

4

5

6

AllAf AmHispWhiteEco Dis

2011 Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-12)2009-2010 School Year, AEA Indicator

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

GraduateContinuerGEDDropout

2011 Completion Rate I Class of 2010

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Met HERC ELATAKS Met Standard

2011 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKSEnglish Language Arts

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Met HERC MathTAKS Met Standard

2011 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKSMathematics

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2011 College Ready GraduatesEnglish Language Arts

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2011 College Ready GraduatesMathematics

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2011 College Ready GraduatesBoth Subjects

Violent and Criminal Incidents

• Texas statute (TEC 39.053) requires every district to publish an annual report on violent and criminal incidents at campuses in the district

• The report must include:– Number, rate and type of incidents– Information concerning school violence prevention and

intervention policies and procedures used by the district– Findings that result from Safe and Drug-Free Schools

and Communities Act

2009-10 2010-110

10

20

30

40

50

60

FelonyMisdemeanorFirearmsAssaultOther Reported

2011 Violent and Criminal Incidents

2011 Accountability Ratings

• District Name – Accountability Rating

• Campus 1 Name – Accountability Rating• Campus 2 Name – Accountability Rating• Campus 3 Name – Accountability Rating• Campus 4 Name – Accountability Rating