AYP vs. AEISAYP vs. AEIS

Talking Accountability @ Carroll Elementary

October 5, 2010

Learning Objective #1Learning Objective #1

I can distinguish between Adequate Yearly Progress

(AYP) and Academic Excellence Indicator System

(AEIS)?

Learning Objective #3Learning Objective #3

I know the different student populations that affect the campus rating

as defined by AYP?

Learning Objective #2Learning Objective #2

I know the different student populations that affect the campus rating

as defined by AEIS?

AYP

vs

AEIS

Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)(AYP)

NCLB

Federal funding

Three indicators◦Reading/Language Arts◦Mathematics◦Attendance rate

Two standards◦Performance◦Participation

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Performance Standard◦In order to meet AYP, a campus must meet the

performance standard for percent proficient.

2009 – 2010 73% (Rdg.) 67% (Math) 2010 – 2011 80% (Rdg.) 75% (Math) 2011 – 2012 87% (Rdg.) 83% (Math) 2012 – 2013 93% (Rdg.) 92% (Math) 2013 – 2014 100% (Rdg.) 100% (Math)

Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)(AYP)

Performance Standard – Student Groups◦All Students◦African-American◦Hispanic◦White◦Economically Disadvantaged◦Special Education◦LEP

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Performance Standard – Assessments

◦ TAKS and TAKS-Accommodated Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10) Reading and Math (Grades 3-5 Spanish)

◦ TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alternate Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10)

◦ LAT – TAKS Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10) Reading and Math (Grades 3-6 Spanish)

◦ LAT – TAKS-M Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10)

◦ TELPAS Used in AYP Participation for students in their first year of

enrollment in US schools

Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)(AYP)

Participation Standard◦In order to meet AYP, a campus must meet the

participation standard for students enrolled on testing date.

95%

Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)

Tailored for the State of Texas

4 Ratings◦Exemplary◦Recognized◦Academically Acceptable◦Academically Unacceptable

Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)

Exemplary All subjects ≥ 90%

25 % Commended Performance for AS and ED Mathematics and Reading

Recognized All subjects ≥ 80% 15 % Commended Performance for AS and ED Mathematics and Reading

Acceptable Reading/ELA ≥ 70%Writing ≥ 70%Social Studies ≥ 70%Math ≥

60%Science ≥ 55%

Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)

Student Groups◦All Students◦African-American◦Hispanic◦White◦Economically Disadvantaged

Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)

Assessments Used…◦TAKS◦TAKS-Accommodated◦TAKS-Modified◦TAKS-Alternate◦LAT◦TELPAS

Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)

Additional Information

◦The 1st and 2nd administration results of Grades 5 and 8 TAKS Reading and Math are combined. Students must be tested on the same campus for results to be used.

Data AnalysisData Analysis

Let’s analyze some actual campus

data…

Met AYP? AEIS Rating?Met AYP? AEIS Rating?Mathematics % Pass %

Commended

AS 91% (95%) 28% (31%)

AA 86% (93%) 20% (25%)

Hispanic 94% (96%) 33% (34%)

Eco Disadv 90% (94%) 27% (28%)

Reading % Pass % Commended

AS 87% (91%) 20% (22%)

AA 84% (88%) 15% (15%)

Hispanic 89% (92%) 23% (25%)

Eco Disadv 85% (89%) 19% (21%)

Met AYP? AEIS Rating?Met AYP? AEIS Rating?Writing % Pass %

Commended

AS 89% (99%) 22% (37%)

AA 86% (100%) 17% (24%)

Hispanic 91% (98%) 27% (45%)

Eco Disadv 86% (99%) 19% (36%)

Science % Pass % Commended

AS 79% (90%) 29% (32%)

AA 73% (80%) 13% (13%)

Hispanic 83% (98%) 40% (45%)

Eco Disadv 79% (89%) 28% (30%)

EvaluationEvaluation

List some differences between AYP and AEIS.

EvaluationEvaluation

List the student populations used to

calculate AEIS and AYP data.