2010 AEIS Board Presentation

download 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

of 41

Transcript of 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    1/41

    2010 ACADEMICEXCELLENCE INDICATOR

    SYSTEM REPORT[AEIS REPORT]

    with Adequate Yearly Performance[AYP] Report

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    2/41

    AEIS DATA CHANGES

    TAKS and TAKS Accommodated(New for all

    grades and all subjects)

    Reading/English Language Arts (ELA) Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science

    New vertical scale cut points for grades 3-9for reading and mathematics

    Only one administration of grade 3 reading

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    3/41

    ADDITIONAL AEISINFORMATION

    OTHER AEIS INDICATORS

    Completion Rate (grades 9-12)

    Annual Dropout Rate (grades 7-8)

    Underreported Students

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    4/41

    TAKS AEIS Standard:Exemplary

    The TAKS standard for allsubjects for an Exemplarycampus and district rating isset at 90% mastery.

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    5/41

    TAKS AEIS Standard:Recognized

    The TAKS standard for allsubjects for a Recognized

    campus and district rating isset at 80%.

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    6/41

    FOUR PATHS TOEXCELLENCE

    Campuses and districts mayMeet:

    an absolute standard ; an improvement standard; a growth model, the Texas

    Progress Measurement (TPM) the exceptions provision

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    7/41

    25 AEIS TAKSPERFORMANCE INDICATORS

    EconomicallyDisadvantaged

    White

    Hispanic

    African

    American

    All Students

    %Passing%Passing%Passing%Passing%Passing

    SCIENCE

    SOCIAL

    STUDIESWRITINGMATHREADING

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    8/41

    EXEMPLARY TAKS PERFORMANCE2010

    95%94%Economically

    Disadvantaged

    96%99%97%94%97%White

    95%94%Hispanic

    96%93%90%African

    American

    97%95%91%All Students

    %Passing%Passing%Passing%Passing%Passing

    SCIENCE

    SOCIAL

    STUDIESWRITINGMATHREADING

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    9/41

    RECOGNIZED TAKSPERFORMANCE 2010

    83%95%94%83%88%Economically

    Disadvantaged

    96%99%97%94%97%White

    83%95%94%83%89%Hispanic

    83%96%93%78%90%African

    American

    88%97%95%86%91%All Students

    %Passing%Passing%Passing%Passing%Passing

    SCIENCESOCIAL

    STUDIESWRITINGMATHREADING

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    10/41

    COMPLETION RATE

    The 2010 AEIS rating structure includescompletion rates for: All Students African American

    Hispanic White Economically Disadvantaged

    The completion rates are one year behind

    the accountability year. The 2010 AEISreports the completion rate for the Classof 2009.

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    11/41

    Completion Rate AEIS

    This longitudinal rate shows students whofirst attended grade 9 in 2005-06 and havecompleted four years later and/or or arecontinuing their education for a 5th year.

    To count as a completer a student musthave received a high school diploma withhis/her class (or earlier) or have re-enrolled

    in the fall of 2009.

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    12/41

    Completion v.Graduation Rate

    This is confusing because AEIS uses a differentdefinition and calculation than is used for AYP.

    AEIS uses the Completion rate which is the rate offour year graduates (or less) and those who

    continue into a fifth year of high school. AYP uses the Graduation rate which is the rate of

    those who graduate within four or fewer years.

    Both use a four year cohort group for calculations.

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    13/41

    COMPLETION RATE

    The Completion Rate standards are: Exemplary 95.0%

    Recognized 85.0%

    Academically 75.0%

    Acceptable

    Completion Rates are rounded to thenearest tenth of a percent

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    14/41

    COMPLETION RATE

    The districts Completion Rates forthe Class of 2009 are:

    All Students 94.1% + 3.0%

    African American 92.7% + 1.6%

    Hispanic 92.2% + 8.6%

    White 95.3% - 1.0%

    Economically 93.7% +7.5%

    Disadvantaged

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    15/41

    Completion Rate AEIS

    93.7% +5.7%88.0%EconomicallyDisadvantaged

    95.3% +1.5%93.8%White

    92.2% +6.0%86.2%Hispanics

    92.7% +8.6%84.1%African American

    94.1% +4.9%89.2%All Students

    DistrictState

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    16/41

    COMPLETION RATE

    *Class of 2009: Asian 13.5% ; Native American 0.1%

    1.0%5.4%9.8%83.8%93.7%

    EconDisadv(36.9%)

    1.9%2.8%4.7%90.6%95.3%hite

    (35.1%)

    2.8%5.0%15.1%77.1%92.2%ispanic

    (38.1%)

    0.9%6.4%9.8%82.9%92.7%

    AfricanAmerican(13.3%)

    1.9%4.0%9.6%84.5%94.1%

    AllStudents(100%)

    GEDRECIPIENTSROPOUTSONTINUERSRADUATES

    COMPLETIONRATE

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    17/41

    COMPLETION RATE

    1.9% +0.2321.7%27GED RECEIPENTS

    4.0% -3.2697.2%117DROPOUTS

    9.6% +11648.6%140CONTINUERS

    84.5% +2144382.5%1337GRADUATES

    100%1708100%1621Total

    CLASS OF 2009CLASS OF 2008

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    18/41

    COMPLETION RATE

    CLOSING THE COMPLETION GAP

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    19/41

    Annual Dropout RateAEIS Indicator

    The annual dropoutrate is for All Studentsand Student Groups.

    It is a one-yearmeasure whichcalculates a rate,summed acrossgrades 7 & 8.

    Standards: Exemplary: 1.8%

    Recognized: 1.8%

    AcademicallyAcceptable: 1.8%

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    20/41

    ANNUAL DROPOUT RATEAnnual dropout data is always a year older than the AEIS year. The

    standard for 2010 is 1.8%

    0.2%50.0%0EconomicallyDisadvantaged

    0.4%40.0%0hite0.5%100.0%1ispanic1.1%70.0%0frican American 0.6%240.0%1ll Students

    %ountount2009008

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    21/41

    UNDERREPORTED STUDENTS

    In order for a district to be rated Exemplary

    or Recognized both measures must bemet.

    Count of Underreported Students: >=150

    % of Underreported Students: >=4.0%

    Districts measures:

    Count 2009 87 2010 27

    % 2009 0.7% 2010 0.2%

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    22/41

    DISTRICTS 2010 RATING

    25 TAKS indicators 5 Completion Rate indicators 5 Annual Dropout indicators 1 Underreported indicator All 36 indicators qualify for Exemplary or

    Recognized ratingDistricts 2010 Rating isRECOGNIZED

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    23/41

    ALL 36 AEIS INDICATORS DISTRICTSREPORT: RECOGNIZED DISTRICT

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    24/41

    TAKS STUDENTGROUPS USED IN AEIS

    The districts demographics reflect patternsfound in the states data.

    60%59%

    Economically

    Disadvantaged

    22%33%White

    52%49%Hispanic

    15%14%AfricanAmerican

    DISTRICTSTATE

    Thepopulationpercentagesof the fourstudentgroups usedin AEIS.

    +1

    +3

    -11

    +1

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    25/41

    STATE/DISTRICTTAKS COMPARISON

    91% +10%ALL STUDENTS88% +26%ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED97% +16%WHITE89% +27%HISPANIC90% +37%AFRICAN AMERICAN

    20102010

    DISTRICTTATEREADING/ELA (3-11)

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    26/41

    STATE/DISTRICTTAKS COMPARISON

    95% +23%ALL STUDENTS94% +31%ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED97% +16%WHITE94% +22%HISPANIC 93% +21%AFRICAN AMERICAN

    20102010

    DISTRICTSTATE

    WRITING (4 & 7)

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    27/41

    STATE/DISTRICTTAKS COMPARISON

    86% +24%ALL STUDENTS83% +49%ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED94% +31%WHITE83% +21%HISPANIC 78% +44%AFRICAN AMERICAN

    20102010

    DISTRICTSTATE

    MATHEMATICS (3-11)

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    28/41

    STATE/DISTRICTTAKS COMPARISON

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    29/41

    STATE/DISTRICTTAKS COMPARISON

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    30/41

    CAMPUS AEIS RATINGS

    2010

    16 Exemplary schools

    18 Recognized schools

    4 Academically Acceptableschools (as an alternative schoolthe highest rating Grimes Education

    Center can received is AcademicallyAcceptable)

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    31/41

    GOLD PERFORMANCEACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The district earned 2 GPAs for:

    % College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2009)

    % of students receiving commended statusfor TAKS Social Studies

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    32/41

    COLLEGE READY GRADUATES(CLASS OF 2009)

    The GPA standard is 35% ormore scored at or above thecollege-ready criteria on bothELA and Math.

    52% +57%ALL STUDENTS39% +72%ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED65% +50%WHITE38% +35%HISPANIC 39% +109%AFRICAN AMERICAN

    20102010

    DISTRICTSTATECollege Ready Graduates

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    33/41

    AYP 2010

    Adequate Yearly Progress is the reportcard component of the No Child Left

    Behind [NCLB] law.

    The district and ALLcampuses met AYP for 2010.

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    34/41

    AYP 2010

    Under provisions of AYP there are 7student groups used for ratingsrather than the 5 used under AEIS.

    Special Education and LimitedEnglish Proficient (LEP) studentgroups are added to All Students;

    African American; Hispanic; Whiteand Economically Disadvantaged

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    35/41

    AYP 2010

    Special Education students and LEPstudents are held to the sameperformance standards as the other

    student groups. Under AYP only Reading/ELA and

    Mathematics are used for ratings rather

    than the four subjects used for AEIS

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    36/41

    AYP 2010

    In addition to TAKS, AYP also collectsdata for test takers who take one of thefollowing: TAKS (Accommodated)

    TAKS-Modified/LAT TAKS-M

    TAKS-Alternative

    LAT version of TAKS

    TELPAS [Is used only for participation, but not forperformance.]

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    37/41

    AYP 2010

    AYP also rates districts and campuses

    participation rate which is the number ofactual test takers divided by the percentageof students enrolled on the day of testing.

    The Participation measure for each subject(reading and math) is summed acrossgrades for Grades 3-8 and 10 and for all

    student groups.

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    38/41

    AYP 2010

    The 2010 AYPPerformancestandards are:

    73% Reading/ELA

    (6% higher than 2009)

    67% Math(9% higher than 2009)

    for all groups

    87%0%LL STUDENTS84%2%EP76%6%PECIAL EDUCATION84%7%ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED94%6%HITE85%7%ISPANIC80%9%FRICAN AMERICANMATHEADING/ELA

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    39/41

    AYP 2010 AYP includes one additional indicator for the district

    and each campus For the district and the high schools this indicator is

    Graduation Rate The standard is 70% and is calculated only at the All

    Student Level The districts rate is 84.5%

    For the middle schools and elementary schools this indicatoris AttendanceThe standard is 90% and is calculated only at the AllStudent Level The districts attendance rate reported by AEIS is 96.1%

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    40/41

    2010-11 HIGHLY QUALIFIEDTEACHER REPORT

    No Child Left Behind legislation requires districts to publicly report theannual progress of the district as a whole and by campus toward meeting thegoal of 100% of core subject area teachers meeting Highly Qualified status

    99.25%Region 1099.25%State

    100%ampuses 100%istrict% of HQ Teachers

  • 8/7/2019 2010 AEIS Board Presentation

    41/41

    Dr. Cloyd HastingsExecutive Director of

    Assessment & Accountability

    2010 OFFICIAL AEIS and AYPREPORT TO THE SCHOOL BOARD

    and THE COMMUNITY

    JANUARY 2011