Post on 27-Aug-2014
description
Layers of Communication: Forms of Talk on TwitterAssociate Professor Axel BrunsARC Future FellowQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbane, Australia@snurb_dot_info | http://mappingonlinepublics.net/
WHY TWITTER?
• Researching Twitter:– Significant world-wide social network– ~700 million accounts (but how many active?)
• Australia: 2.5 to 3 million accounts (Twitter, Inc. claims 4 million)– Varied range of uses:
from phatic communication to emergency coordination– Strong history of user innovation: @replies, #hashtags– Flat and open network structure:
non-reciprocal following, public profiles by default– Good API for gathering (big) data for research– Ethical concerns comparatively limited
TWITTER AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE(S)
• New methodologies:– Empirical, large-scale, real-time investigation: ‘big (social) data’– Data-led, comprehensive evaluation rather than small-scale
sampling of public communication– But also: combined quantitative/qualitative approaches– Not studying the Internet, but studying society with the Internet
(Richard Rogers)
• New(ish) frameworks:– Public spherules, issue publics, personal publics (Jan Schmidt):
multiple interlinked spaces in a complex media ecology
TWITTER AND SOCIETY
• Twitter and Society (New York: Peter Lang, 2014)
– Jan Schmidt: Twitter followers as the personal public around each account
– Axel Bruns and Hallvard Moe: three layers of communication on Twitter
– Alex Halavais: structural evolution of Twitter as a platform for communication
LAYERS OF TALK ON TWITTER
• Key needs in Twitter research:– Understand how hashtags are situated in a wider communicative ecology on Twitter– Document the day-to-day uses of Twitter, beyond and outside hashtags– Trace the dynamics of Twitter as a platform for everyday quasi-private, interpersonal,
and/or public communication– Track the impact of social and technological changes on these uses
• ad hoc publics, often rapidly forming
and dissolving
macro: #hashtags
• personal publics, accumulating slowly and relatively stable
meso: follower networks
• interpersonalcommunication,
ephemeral
micro:@replies
(Bruns & Moe, 2014)
MACRO: #ROYALWEDDING (29 APR. 2011)
MESO: FOLLOWER NETWORKS
PerthMarketing / PR
DesignWeb
Creative
FarmingAgriculture
HardlineConservatives
ConservativesJournalists
ALPProgressives
Greens
News
OpinionNews
NGOsSocial Policy
ITTech
Social MediaTechPR
Advertising
Real EstateProperty
JobsHR
Business
BusinessProperty
Parenting
Mums CraftArts
FoodWine
Beer
Adelaide
SocialICTs
CreativeDesign
FashionBeauty
UtilitiesServices
Net Culture
BooksLiteraturePublishing
FilmTheatre
Arts
RadioTV Music
DanceHip Hop
Triple JTalkback
Breakfast TVCelebritiesCycling
Union
NRL
FootballCricket
AFL
SwimmingV8s
Evangelicals
Teachinge-Learning
Schools
ChristiansHillsong
Teens
Jonas Bros.Beliebers
Australian Bands
@KRuddMP@JuliaGillard
Follower/followee network:~120,000 Australian Twitter users(of ~950,000 known accounts by early 2012) colour = outdegree, size = indegree
MICRO: @MENTIONS (2013 ELECTION)
INTERSECTIONS BETWEEN THE LAYERS
• Micro + Meso + Macro:– Layers of communication do not exist in isolation– Information is transitioned from one layer to another– Key mechanism: retweets
• Retweeting an @mention: micro meso• Retweeting a hashtagged tweet: macro meso• Retweeting (just by itself): meso1 meso2
• Retweeting while adding a hashtag: meso macro• Retweeting while adding an @mention: meso micro
– These create intersections between different publics:• Between personal publics and issue publics (vertical)• Between different users’ personal publics (horizontal)
#AUSPOL
Follower/followee network:~120,000 Australian Twitter users(of ~950,000 known accounts by early 2012) colour = #auspol tweets, size = indegree
#ROYALWEDDING
Follower/followee network:~120,000 Australian Twitter users(of ~950,000 known accounts by early 2012) colour = #royalwedding tweets, size = indeg.
7.5 mins. elapsed
@abcnews
DISSEMINATION OF THE JULIA GILLARD ‘MISOGYNY SPEECH’ VIDEO, 9 OCT. 2012
30 mins. elapsed
Journalists
DISSEMINATION OF THE JULIA GILLARD ‘MISOGYNY SPEECH’ VIDEO, 9 OCT. 2012
1 hour elapsed
Feminists
DISSEMINATION OF THE JULIA GILLARD ‘MISOGYNY SPEECH’ VIDEO, 9 OCT. 2012
5 hours elapsed
DISSEMINATION OF THE JULIA GILLARD ‘MISOGYNY SPEECH’ VIDEO, 9 OCT. 2012
RESEARCH ON TALK IN TWITTER PUBLICS
• #hashtags (macro):– Useful coordinating mechanism for discussion around key events– Relatively easy to capture and analyse– Fails to capture non-hashtagged tweets about the topic– Good case studies, but very little comparative work to date
• @mentions (micro):– Backbone of everyday interpersonal communication on Twitter– Easy to track within a pre-defined population of accounts (e.g. politicians)– Studies on selected populations usually fail to examine everyday uses– Potential for significantly larger-scale studies yet to be realised
• Follower/followee relations (meso):– Crucial contextual baseline for macro/micro-level studies– Slow and laborious data gathering process, never complete– Very long-term perspective, beyond the reach of most funded projects– But indispensable for study of Twitter as a public space
NONE OF THIS IS NEW (BUT…)
• Beyond ‘the’ public sphere:– Need to revisit and refashion existing theories for a post-mass media
media ecology– Multiple overlapping publics at different levels, driven by network logics
• Publics on Twitter:– What drives their formation and dissipation?– How do they interact and interweave?– How are they interleaved with the wider media ecology?– Twitter doesn’t contain publics: publics transcend Twitter
• Twitter and society:– To what extent does Twitter mirror broader communicative patterns?– Can we apply ‘big social data’ research methods beyond Twitter itself?
http://mappingonlinepublics.net/@snurb_dot_info@jeanburgess@timhighfield@dpwoodford@tsadkowsky