Post on 02-Jan-2016
Congress I
3/8/2012
Clearly Communicated Learning Objectives in Written Form
• Upon completion of this course, students will be able to:– identify and explain the role of formal
(congressional) institutions and their effect on policy. – to understand and interpret the United States
Constitution and apply it to present policy dilemmas. – have a better understanding of why our national
government works and why the American system of government is unique.
Office Hours and Readings
• Chapter 8 on Congress
• Office Hours– Today 11-2
SUPER TUESDAY
Not the Game Changer
This in 2008 To This in 2012
What Was at Stake
• 10 States
• More than 400 Delegates
• 21 states and 800+ delegates in 2008
• Romney wins 6
• Santorum wins 3
• Gingrich wins 1
• Ron Paul will never quit
The Delegate Count
THE CONGRESSArticle I
The Great Compromise
Eligibility
House• 25 Years Old
• 7 Years a US resident
• Citizen
Senate• 30 Years old
• 9 Years a US resident
• Citizen
The Senate
• 2 Seats for Every State
• 6 year Terms that overlap
• 9 States have more than 50% of population, but 18% of representation
The House
• 435 Seats
• Divided by Population
• 2-year terms
• 700,000 Constituents
REDISTRICTING AND REAPPORTIONMENT
Reapportionment
• Dividing up the 435 House Seats
• Based on the Census
• Every state Gets 1 (50 states)
• 385 Seats are at play every year
Winners and Losers 2012
Redistricting
• The process of redrawing districts within a state
• State legislatures control the battle
• Very Political
Laws on Redistricting
• Districts must have equal populations
• You cannot destroy a party either
• You cannot dilute minority voting
• Malapportionment
Gerrymandering
• An Eponym
• Politically motivated redefinition of election districts.
• Not possible in the Senate
Packing and Cracking
Partisan Gerrymandering
• The Most Traditional Form
• Drawing lines to favor a political party
• Some of the Worst
Racial Gerrymandering
• The Original intent
• Voting Rights Act
• The Modern intent– Descriptive representation– Majority minority districts
• The Political Implications
GERRYMANDERING AND THE CASE OF TEXAS- 2003
The Events Leading Up to it all
• In 2000, the Democrats Gerrymander the state in their favor
• In 2002, the Democrats get 44% of the vote and 54% of the Seats in Congress
• Republicans take the Texas House and Senate and want payback
Payback Courtesy of Tom De Lay
• A mid-year reapportionment
• Strategy– 2 for 1s– Create unsafe seats– Make life miserable
What it did locally
Why it Fell apart
• Voting Rights Act
• One district ruled in violation
• The Rest Fell like dominoes
• But the Damage Was Done
What Happened to Tom De Lay?
• DWTS
• Currently on bail awaiting an appeal on money laundering
GERRYMANDERING AND TEXAS- 2011
What Happens
• The Republicans win big in 2010
• Large Majorities in the House and Senate
The Legislature Draws the First Map
• It Favors the Republicans (Duh)
• Legal Challenges by Latino and African-American Groups
A Federal Court in San Antonio Draws a New Map
• This map favors Democrats
• The State of Texas sues
• This postpones our Primary from Super Tuesday
A Compromise
• Our Primary is now May 29th
• The New map gives Democrats 2-3 of the new seats….
• No One is really happy
What it Does to Austin
• Creates 5 Districts
• Four Safe Republican
• Stretches Doggett’s District to San Antonio
GETTING TO CONGRESS
The Bad Old Days
• Congress Did very Little
• It was seen as a penance
• D.C. Was not a nice place
What has changed?
• Air Conditioning
• Congress does more
• People want to go there
Who Are Our Congressman: Wealthy
Why so many millionaires?
• Running for Congress is a costly endeavor
• Running for Congress is a full-time job
• You need a job that permits this
Congress is Older
Still More Men Than Women
Changes Since the 1990’s
A GREAT JOB
Well-Paid
Great Benefits
• Money For Trips and Travel
• Great Pension
• Cheap Health Care
Other Perks
• Great Parking
• 3 day work week
• Franking Privilege
• Power and Prestige