Webinar 1-13-2011

99
www.trafficlogix.com Welcome to Traffic Logix’s webinar: Real life challenges and design presented by: Fehr & Peers Consulting Group Steve Brown, Seleta Reynolds, Christine Carey For technical difficulties call 1-866-915-6449 ext 230 or e-mail [email protected]

description

 

Transcript of Webinar 1-13-2011

Page 1: Webinar 1-13-2011

www.trafficlogix.com

Welcome to Traffic Logix’s webinar: Real life challenges and design presented by:Fehr & Peers Consulting GroupSteve Brown, Seleta Reynolds, Christine Carey

For technical difficulties call 1-866-915-6449 ext 230or

e-mail [email protected]

Page 2: Webinar 1-13-2011

Host and Moderator ----- Craig C TimothyVice President of Traffic Logix &Director of Business DevelopmentTwenty –three years of experience working local government transportation

Page 3: Webinar 1-13-2011

Fehr & Peers:

• Transportation Planning/Engineering Firm • 200 employees in 13 Offices• Work throughout US, Asia, and Middle East• Leaders in Traffic Calming since 1995• Co-authors of US Traffic Calming Manual• Developed and maintain trafficalming .org

Page 4: Webinar 1-13-2011

Steven Brown, PE

- 25 years of experience in transportation planning and traffic engineering

- BS and MS from UC Berkeley in CE

- MBA from Golden Gate University

- Managed projects in 10 states

- Created traffic calming programs and projects for 25+ agencies

- Co-author of the US Traffic Calming Manual.

Page 5: Webinar 1-13-2011

Seleta Reynolds, AICP

- 12 years of experience planning, funding, and implementing active transportation projects

- Created traffic calming plans for neighborhoods in cities from Sonoma, CA to Portland, ME.

- Member of the TRB Pedestrian Committee

- Three-time President of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals.

Page 6: Webinar 1-13-2011

Christine Carey, PE, AICP

- 10 years of engineering and urban planning experience.

- BS in CE from Carnegie Mellon

- MS in City and Regional Planning from Pratt Institute

- Managed numerous traffic calming projects and programs, including the City of Fort Bragg, City of New Rochelle, and University of San Francisco.

Page 7: Webinar 1-13-2011

La Habra Traffic CalmingTextbook Approach

Page 8: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 9: Webinar 1-13-2011

East Neighborhood Plan

Page 10: Webinar 1-13-2011

Plan ProcessPlan Process

December 13, 2006November 14

October 11, 2006September 14, 2006August 30, 2006

February 28, 2007

May 2007

Page 11: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 12: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 13: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 14: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 15: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 16: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 17: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 18: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 19: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 20: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 21: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 22: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 23: Webinar 1-13-2011

Type of Measure Low Estimate

High Estimate

Unit Quantity Sub‐Total

Speed Lumps $2,000 $5,000 per location

20 $100,000

Raised Crosswalk $4,000 $8,000 per location

2 $16,000

Neckdown/Bulbout $10,000 $20,000 per location

1 $20,000

Center Island Narrowing

$6,000 $12,000 per location

1 $12,000

Chicane $10,000 $20,000 per location

1 $20,000

Turn‐Movement Restrictions

$150 $250 per sign 2 $500

Turn‐Movement Restrictions

$150 $250 per sign 2 $500

TOTAL = $168,500

Construction Cost

Page 24: Webinar 1-13-2011

Comments Received from General PublicCommittee to Review

Page 25: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 26: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 27: Webinar 1-13-2011

Approval Process

• Neighborhood Survey

• 50% Minimum Response Rate

• 67% Approval Rate

• City Council

Page 28: Webinar 1-13-2011

Advertised Via:

• Signage

• Newsletter

• Website

• TV channel

Page 29: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 30: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 31: Webinar 1-13-2011

Post Project Data

Page 32: Webinar 1-13-2011

Post Project Data

Page 33: Webinar 1-13-2011

Post Project Data

• Replicated locations and time of “before” counts• Presented results to committee members• Staff and committee recommended minor changes – move 

one hump and add one hump• Presented to City Council for final adoption and approval 

for supplemental items

Page 34: Webinar 1-13-2011

Photos courtesy of Michael Throne, City of Benicia

Page 35: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 36: Webinar 1-13-2011

Case Study:  City of Benicia

Page 37: Webinar 1-13-2011

Outline

• Overview of the City’s program

• Review of it in practice

• Design solutions for major roads

• Lessons learned

Page 38: Webinar 1-13-2011

Benicia’s Traffic Calming Program

Page 39: Webinar 1-13-2011

Two‐Tiered Program

• Minor roads are handled through a neighborhood‐based process.

• Major roads are handled through the City’s Traffic, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Safety Committee.

• Major roads and minor roads have slightly different toolboxes

Page 40: Webinar 1-13-2011

Major Road Test Case

Page 41: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 42: Webinar 1-13-2011

Approach ‐ Overview

• Flexible approach to outreach

• User‐friendly tools that help citizens understand real‐time effects 

• Simulation makes complex interactions easy to view

Page 43: Webinar 1-13-2011

Photos courtesy of Michael Throne, City of Benicia

Page 44: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 45: Webinar 1-13-2011

In the toolbox:

• Lane Narrowing

• Gateway Treatments

• Medians

• Signals and Roundabouts

• Road Diets/Lane Reductions

Page 46: Webinar 1-13-2011

10 Foot

Wide Lane

Santa Cruz, California

Page 47: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 48: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 49: Webinar 1-13-2011

Lane Conversions (4 to 3 Lane)

Roadway Location Date Change

ADT Before

ADT After

Collision Reduction

Greenwood Ave NN 80th St to N 50th

Apr‐95 11872 12427 24 to 1058%

N 45th StreetWallingford Area

Dec‐72 19421 20274 45 to 2349%

8th Ave NWBallard Area

Jan‐94 10549 11858 18 to 761%

Martin luther King Jr WNorth of I 90

Jan‐94 12336 13161 15 to 660%

Dexter Ave NQueen Ann Area

Jun‐91 13606 14949 19 to 1659%

24th Ave NWNW 85th to NW 65th

Oct‐ 95 9727 9754 14 to 1028%

Page 50: Webinar 1-13-2011

Recommendations

Page 51: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 52: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 53: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 54: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 55: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 56: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 57: Webinar 1-13-2011

Lessons Learned

• Simulation revealed non‐intuitive solutions• Partners are critical to implementation

Page 58: Webinar 1-13-2011

Case Study:  City of Fort Bragg, CA

Page 59: Webinar 1-13-2011

Outline

• Planning Framework

• Approach to Traffic Calming

• Outreach and Agency Coordination

• Recommended Improvements

Page 60: Webinar 1-13-2011

Planning Framework

CA‐1

Page 61: Webinar 1-13-2011

Planning Framework

Page 62: Webinar 1-13-2011

Approach to Traffic Calming

Data Collection

• Volume

• Speed

• Collisions

Page 63: Webinar 1-13-2011

Volume

Page 64: Webinar 1-13-2011

Speed

Page 65: Webinar 1-13-2011

Collisions

Page 66: Webinar 1-13-2011

Approach to Traffic Calming

Data Collection

Observe Existing Conditions

Page 67: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 68: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 69: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 70: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 71: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 72: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 73: Webinar 1-13-2011

Approach to Traffic Calming

Data Collection

Observe Existing Conditions

Identify Range of Solutions

Page 74: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 75: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 76: Webinar 1-13-2011

Outreach & Agency Coordination

• 2 open house workshops• Stakeholder meetings• Walking audit of the project areas• City Council workshop

Page 77: Webinar 1-13-2011

Recommended  Improvements

Page 78: Webinar 1-13-2011
Page 79: Webinar 1-13-2011

Summary

Fir Street

• Mini traffic circles• Speed cushions• High‐visibility crosswalks• Restripe/narrow travel lanes

• Cost estimate: $50‐75k• Speed reduction: 4‐9mph• Volume reduction: 5‐7%

Harold Street

• Curb extensions• Centerline striping at corner• Speed cushions • High‐visibility crosswalks• Splitter islands • Flashing stop sign withadvance signage/stop bars

• Cost estimate: $150‐200k• Speed reduction: 3‐9mph• Volume reduction: 7‐10%

Page 80: Webinar 1-13-2011

Beverly Hills, CAGreat Plan & Poor Trial

Page 81: Webinar 1-13-2011

Existing Problems

AREA-WIDE PROBLEMS

Excess ive Truck Tr aff ic

WILSHIRE BLVD.

CHARLEVILLE BLVD.

GREGORY WAY

OLYMPIC BLVD.

REEV

ES D

R.

CAN

ON

DR.

CRE

SCEN

T DR.

ELM

DR.

REXF

ORD

DR.

MAP

LE D

R.

PALM

DR.

OAK

HURS

T DR

.

DOHE

NY D

R.

BEVE

RLY D

R.

GENERAL GROUPINGS OF TRAFFIC PROBLEMSANECTODAL COMMITTEE COMMENTS FROM MEETING A2

Pedestri an SafetySpee dsCut-Through Traff icMisuse o f AlleysParking Sh ortage

CUT-T

HRU

PEAK

H

OUR

CONG

ESTIO

N

SAFE

TY

VOLU

MES/

SPEE

DS

SPEE

DS

SPEE

DS

CUT-THRU STOP SIGN VIOLATIONSCU

T-THR

U/PAR

KING

SHOR

TAGE

F IGURE 1

PEAK

HOU

R VOL

UMES

/CUT-T

HRU

VOLU

MES/S

PEED

S/CUT

-THRU

PEAK

HOUR

CON

GEST

ION

CUT-THRU/STOP SIGN VIOLATIONS

Page 82: Webinar 1-13-2011

Existing 85th %ile Speeds

LEGEND

- S top S ig n

- T raf fic Sign al

EX ISTING FEATURES:

- Sch oo ls

- All-Way Stop

- Spe ed Hum p

- Em ergency Respo nse Ro ute

WILSHIRE BLVD.

CHARLEVILLE BLVD.

GREGORY WAY

OLYMPIC BLVD.

REEV

ES D

R.

CAN

ON

DR.

CRE

S CEN

T DR.

ELM

DR .

REXF

ORD

DR.

MAP

LE D

R.

PALM

DR .

OAK

H URS

T DR

.

D OHE

N Y D

R.

B EVE

R LY D

R.

85TH PERCENTILE SPEEDS

XX/YY - 85th Percentile Traffic SpeedsXX=Southbound or WestboundYY=Northbound or Eastbound

17/1730

/33

37/3

2

34/3

5

33/3

3

39/35

35/3

5

33/3

5FIGURE

Page 83: Webinar 1-13-2011

Existing Volumes

LEG END

- Stop S ign

- Traf fic Signal

EX ISTING FEATURES:

- Schools

- Speed Hump

- Em ergency Response Route

WILSHIRE BLVD.

CHARLEVILLE BLVD.

GREGORY WAY

OLYMPIC BLVD.

REEV

ES D

R.

CAN

ON

DR.

CRE

SCEN

T DR.

ELM

DR.

REXF

ORD

DR.

MAP

LE D

R.

PALM

DR.

OAK

HURS

T D

R.

DOHE

NY D

R.

BEVE

RLY D

R.

AVERAGE DAILY T RAFFIC VOLU MES - EXISTING CONDITIONSREVISED APRIL 16, 2 00 1

500 - Bi -Directional Average Daily Traff ic Volum es

2,60

02,

000

1,80

0

1,50

0

5,80

0

1,20

0

800

2,60

0

1,70

0

3,500

2,10

0

6,60

0

1,60

0

1,40

0

2,00

0

1,800

2,50

0

1,900

5,70

0

2,40

0

1,20

0

2,00

0

17,0

00

51,600

47,900WILSHIRE @LINDEN

BEVERLY @DAYTON

23,600

3,00

04,9

00

6,700 5,200

4,400 3,900

Page 84: Webinar 1-13-2011

Non-Local Traffic Distribution

NON-LOCAL TRAFFIC DIST RIBUT ION

EASTBOUNDNON-LOCAL

TRAFFIC

WESTBOUNDNON-LOCAL

TRAFFIC

NORTHBOUNDNON-LOCAL

TRAFFIC

SOUTHBOUNDNON-LOCAL

TRAFFIC

Page 85: Webinar 1-13-2011

Objectives: Stop Sign Violations

Measured Range Objective

17% to 75% Stop 50%42% to 92% Stop/Roll 90%

Page 86: Webinar 1-13-2011

Objectives: 85th Percentile Speeds

Measured Range Of 85% Speeds 17 – 39 mph

Objective

25mph 85%ile35mph Max

Page 87: Webinar 1-13-2011

Objectives: Non-Local Traffic

Location % ReductionAverage of All Streets 60% ReductionMin. for Each Street 25% Reduction

Page 88: Webinar 1-13-2011

Scenario ILEGEND

- Stop S ign

- Traf fic Signal

- Traf fic Circ le

- Pedest rian Island

- Parall el Parki ng on Both S i des

EX ISTING FEATURES:

PR OPO SED DEVIC ES:

- Schools

- All-Way Stops at A ll Internal Intersections (not shown on map)

- Speed Hump

- Maj or Emergency Respon se Rou te

WILSHIRE BLVD.

GREGORY WAY

OLYMPIC BLVD.

REEV

ES D

R.

CAN

ON

DR.

CRE

SCEN

T DR.

ELM

DR.

REXF

ORD

DR.

MAP

LE D

R.

PALM

DR.

OAK

HURS

T DR

.

DOHE

NY D

R.

BEVE

RLY D

R.

- Speed Table

- Midblo ck Is land

SCENARIO I

- High V is ibi lity Cros swalk

- Speed Legends at All Ent rys (n ot sh own on map)

- Rai sed Intersection

25

CHARLEVILLE BLVD.

- Turn Rest ri cti on

- Local Emerge ncy Response Route

Page 89: Webinar 1-13-2011

Scenario IILEGEND

- S top S ig n

- T raf fic Signal

- T raf fic Circ le

- Pedestrian I sland

- Parallel Parki ng on Both Si des

EXISTING AND SCENARIO FEATURES:I

PRO POSED DEVICES:

- Schools

- All-Way Stop at All Internal Intersections (Not Shown on Map)

- M ajor Emergency Response Route

WILSHIRE BLVD.

CHARLEVILLE BLVD.

GREGORY WAY

OLYMPIC BLVD.

REEV

ES D

R.

CAN

ON

DR.

CRE

SCEN

T DR.

ELM

DR.

REXF

ORD

DR.

MAP

LE D

R.

PALM

DR.

OAK

HURS

T DR

.

DOHE

NY D

R.

BEVE

RLY

DR.

- Speed Table- M idblock Island

SC ENARIO II

- H igh Vis ibi lity Crosswa lk

- R ai sed Intersec tion

- F orced-Turn Is land

- T urn Rest ri cti on

- T urn Rest ri cti on

- L ocal Emergency Response R oute

(Painted or Raised)

Page 90: Webinar 1-13-2011

Scenario IIILEGEND

- Stop S ign

- Traf fic Signal

- Traf fic Circ le

- Pedest rian I sland

- Parall el Parki ng on Both S i des

EXISTING AND SCENARIO FEATURES:I/II

PR OPO SED DEVIC ES:

- Schools

- All-Way Stop at All Internal Intersections (Not Shown on Map)

WILSHIRE BLVD.

CHARLEVILLE BLVD.

GREGORY WAY

OLYMPIC BLVD.

REEV

ES D

R.

CAN

ON

DR.

CRE

SCEN

T DR.

ELM

DR.

REXF

ORD

DR.

MAP

LE D

R.

PALM

DR.

OAK

HURS

T DR

.

DOHE

NY D

R.

BEVE

RLY D

R.

- Speed Table

- Midblo ck Is land

- High V is ibi lity Cros swalk

- Rai sed Intersection

- Turn Rest ri cti on

- Forced-Tur n Island

- Hal f Closur e

SCENARIO III

- Forced-Tur n Island

- Maj or Emergency Respon se Rou te

- Local Emerge ncy Response Route

( Pa inted or Raised)

Page 91: Webinar 1-13-2011

Estimated Reduced 85th Percentile Speeds

E/W Streets Range AverageExisting 17-27 23Scenario I 16-25 22Scenario II 16-25 22Scenario III 16-25 22

N/S Streets Range AverageExisting 30-38 35Scenario I 30-34 32Scenario II 28-34 31Scenario III 25-31 29

Page 92: Webinar 1-13-2011

Estimated Reduction in Non-Local Traffic

All Streets Range AverageScenario I 29-56% 38%Scenario II 33-82% 60%Scenario III 58-84% 73%

Page 93: Webinar 1-13-2011

Estimated Increase in Traffic on Arterial Streets

Wilshire Olympic Beverly Doheny

Scenario I +4% +4% +7% +10%

Scenario II +7% +7% +10% +13%

Scenario III +8% +7% +15% +21%

Page 94: Webinar 1-13-2011

Committee Recommendation

• Two‐phased approach, starting with primarily speed control (Scenario I) and moving towards volume control if results are not satisfactory.

• Conduct field tests to measure impact to Fire Department response time. 

Page 95: Webinar 1-13-2011

Field Tests

• Fire Department brought trucks and ladders to the site.

• Staff placed cones to represent circles and median islands.

• Fire Department did “test” runs with and without the devices.

• Circles added 25 seconds per location, compared to 5-8 seconds as national norm.

Page 96: Webinar 1-13-2011

Circle Dimensions

Page 97: Webinar 1-13-2011

Key Learnings

• Fire Department has a valid but very narrow mission.

• Someone at the City (manager or council) needed to balance Fire Dept needs against other public safety and livability needs.

• Field tests should be done with actual devices or very similar.

Page 98: Webinar 1-13-2011

For More Information or Specific Questions Contact:

• Craig Timothy, Traffic Logix– [email protected]– 801-712-9010

• Steve Brown, Fehr & Peers (La Habra, Beverley’s Hills)– [email protected]– 949-306-3308

• Seleta Reynolds, Fehr & Peers (Benicia)– [email protected]– 425-820-0100

• Christine Carey, Fehr & Peers (Ft Bragg)– [email protected]– 415-348-0300

Page 99: Webinar 1-13-2011

Questions and Answers

www.trafficlogix.com