The Politics of TV FINAL

10
The Politics of TV How Distribution Platforms Affect Cultural Ideology By Lilia Hadjiivanova California State University, Los Angeles

Transcript of The Politics of TV FINAL

Page 1: The Politics of TV FINAL

The Politics of TV

How Distribution Platforms Affect Cultural Ideology

By Lilia HadjiivanovaCalifornia State University, Los Angeles

Page 2: The Politics of TV FINAL

Distribution Platforms: Broadcast Network vs. On-Demand Subscription

o Broadcasting networko Relies on advertiserso Importance of ratingso Broad audience

o On-demand Internet subscription-based streamingo Relies on # of subscriberso Importance of ‘quality’ contento Niche audience

Page 3: The Politics of TV FINAL

Research Questions

Does the medium influence the message?

Is dominant American cultural ideology reinforced or challenged?

How are the following represented: gender (fixed gender roles, masculinity is dominant, femininity is submissive), race (racial stereotypes, whitewashing, symbolic annihilation), class (prevalence of middle- and upper-class characters), American dream (individualism, pursuit of happiness, upward social mobility, “having it all”)

Page 4: The Politics of TV FINAL

The Shows

VS.

Page 5: The Politics of TV FINAL

Similarities

one-hour political dramas which combine melodrama and violence depict issues of power, loyalty, marriage, and political back-stabbing

have diverse casts and strong female leads

innovative

Page 6: The Politics of TV FINAL

Differences: Broad vs Niche

o Melodrama / Soap opera feel

o Emphasis on romance

o Fast-paced editing

o Outrageous plot twists

o Weekly ‘amnesia’

o “Guilty pleasure”

o ‘Quality’ / Cinematic feel

o Emphasis on politics

o Slow pace

o Plausible plot twists

o Episodic ‘memory’

o Literary references

Page 7: The Politics of TV FINAL

Differences: Gender

o ‘Livvie’ goes from being outspoken, independent (S1) passive, emotional mess (S2)

o Heterosexual, romantico Family-oriented

Her happiness is contingent on love

o Egalitarian marriageo Ambiguous sexuality, aromantico Not family-orientedo Open relationship

Her happiness is contingent on power

Page 8: The Politics of TV FINAL

Differences: Race

o Assimilationist (colorblind)

o Black Boss Lady, Scary Black Man tropes

o Multicultural (diversity)

o Representation of otherwise symbolically annihilated populations e.g. Native Americans

Gray, H. (2000), “The Politics of Representation in Network Television” in Newcomb, Horace. Television: The Critical View. New York: Oxford University Press

Page 9: The Politics of TV FINAL

Differences: Social Class & the American Dream

o Middle- / Upper-class characters

o Pursuit of happiness / Desire to “have it all”

o Reinforces the American Dream

o Working-class characters in main roles

o Pursuit of power / Not wanting “it all”

o Attacks the American Dream

Page 10: The Politics of TV FINAL

Conclusion

o Goal to sell a product (other than the show itself)

o Lowest common denominator

o Reinforces dominant values

o Does not address racism / class inequality

o reaches more people, but represents a limited part of the population

o Goal to sell the show

o Niche

o Challenges hegemonic ideals

o Addresses racism / class inequality

o reaches fewer people but represents a broader, more diverse population