LSSIP 2018 - FINLAND · The Finnish Transport and communications Agency Traficom, CAA Finland,...
Transcript of LSSIP 2018 - FINLAND · The Finnish Transport and communications Agency Traficom, CAA Finland,...
EUROCONTROL25 YEARS
of ATM Implementation Reportingin Europe
Level 1 - Implementation Overview
LSSIP 2018 - FINLANDLocal Single Sky ImPlementation
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland Released Issue
Document Title LSSIP Year 2018 for Finland
Infocentre Reference 19/02/05/15
Date of Edition 10/04/2019
LSSIP Focal Point Jouko RANTA - [email protected] Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
LSSIP Contact Person Luca DELL’ORTO – [email protected] EUROCONTROL/DECMA/ACS/PRM
Status Released
Intended for Agency Stakeholders
Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
Reference Documents
LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip LSSIP Guidance Material
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2018
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-plan
Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2018
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-report
European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor Acronyms and abbreviations
https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/Glossaries.pdf
AIP FINLAND https://www.ais.fi/en
NEFAB Performance Plan
https://www.nefab.eu/docs
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland Released Issue
APPROVAL SHEET
The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2018 document and their signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2018.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland Released Issue
CONTENTS
1. National ATM Environment ............................................................ 6 Geographical Scope ............................................................................................ 6 National Stakeholders ........................................................................................ 8
2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 15 Evolution of traffic in Finland ........................................................................... 15 Helsinki ACC (former Tampere ACC) ................................................................ 16
3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 19
4. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 20
5. Cooperation activities .................................................................. 21 FAB Co-ordination ............................................................................................ 21 Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 22
6. Implementation Objectives Progress ........................................... 24 State View......................................................................................................... 24 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 30
Annexes Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Finland
National stakeholders’ organisation charts
Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR, ICAO and DP
Glossary of abbreviations
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 1 Released Issue
Executive Summary
National ATM Context
The Finnish Transport and communications Agency Traficom, CAA Finland, including the role as NSA, carry out the civil aviation regulatory tasks. Traficom is an authority serving people and businesses in licence, registration and approval matters related to transport and communications. Traficom is a merger of the Finnish Transport Safety Agency, Trafi; Communications Regulatory Authority, FICORA; and certain functions of the Transport Agency.
Finavia Corporation is responsible for maintaining 21 state owned airports, of which 19 are involved in regular traffic. In addition, there are three non-state-owned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Lappeenranta, Mikkeli and Seinäjoki). Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and the only one being co-ordinated and covered by the LSSIP.
Air Navigation Services Finland Oy (ANS Finland) is taking care of all En-route and airport related ATM services, except EFMI and EFSI.
The Finnish Meteorological Institute is designated as MET service provider to supply MET data on an exclusive basis in Helsinki FIR.
Traficom, ANS Finland and FMI report to the Ministry of Transport and Communications. Finavia reports to the Prime Minister’s office.
The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management.
Finland has an integrated civil-military ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done based on actual needs.
Military/Air Force does not have any service provision role in Finnish aviation.
The Safety Investigation Authority (SIA), reporting to the Ministry of Justice, carries out safety investigations following accidents and/or serious incidents.
Traffic and Capacity
2018 Traffic in Finland increased by 8.3% during summer 2018 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in 2017.
2019-2024
The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.2% and 2.8% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.5%.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 2 Released Issue
Progress per SESAR Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1 (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.
The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ATM MP L3 Edition 2011-2017) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.
Pre-SESAR Implementation
2010 2019 82%
PCP Implementation
2015 2023 33%
Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.
n/a
70%
Pre-
SESA
R
90% 74%
89%
69%
12%
Pre-
SESA
R
Pre-
SESA
R
Pre-
SESA
R
PCP
PCP
PCP
PCP
Optimised ATM
Network Services
Advanced Air Traffic Services
High Performing
Airport Operations
26%
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 3 Released Issue
ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks 0 and 1. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6.1.
Block 0 2010 2018
88%
Block 1 2015 2022
52%
ATM Deployment Outlook
● State objectives
Deployed in 2017-2018: - Surveillance Performance & Interoperability [ITY-SPI] 100% progress
- Data Link [ITY-AGDL] 100% progress - Collaborative Flight Planning [FCM03] 98% progress - FMTP [ITY-FMTP] 92% progress - AMHS [COM10] 67% progress - OAT and GAT handling [AOM13.1] 65% progress - ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 53% progress - Real-Time Airspace Data [AOM19.2] 52% progress - ASM/ATFCM process [AOM19.3] 40% progress
- NewPENS [COM12] 53% progress - Aircraft Identification [ITY-ACID] 50% progress - MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 48% progress - Aeronautical Information [ITY-ADQ] 28% progress - eTOD [INF07] 16% progress - Voice over IP [COM11] 10% progress
- Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 33% progress - STAM Phase 2 [FCM04.2] 10% progress - Pre-defined Airspace Configurations [AOM19.4] 10% progress - Traffic Complexity [FCM06] 10% progress - Extended Flight Plan [FCM08] 10% progress
- SWIM Yellow TI Profile [INF08.1] 0% progress - Multi Sector Planning En-route [ATC18] 0% progress
● Airport objectives - EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport
Deployed in 2017-2018: - A-SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) [AOP04.2] 100% progress
- CCOs [ENV03] 70% progress
- CDOs [ENV01] 82% progress
By 12/2019 By 12/2020 By 12/2021 2022+
By 12/2019 By 12/2020 By 12/2021 2022+
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 4 Released Issue
● Airport objectives - EFKE - KEMI-TORNIO
Deployed in 2017-2018: /
- Remote Tower [AOP14] 0% progress
By 12/2019 By 12/2020 By 12/2021 2022+
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 5 Released Issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3)/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2018, together with plans for the next years.
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;
Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2018, which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;
Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;
Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;
Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high-level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2018. In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.
The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 6 Released Issue
1. National ATM Environment
Geographical Scope
International Membership
Finland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since
ECAC 1955
EUROCONTROL 2001
European Union 1995
EASA 2006
ICAO 1949
NATO - -
ITU 1920
Geographical description of the FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses the Helsinki FIR (EFIN) former Finland FIR. Flight Information Region (FIR) has been renamed in 2019 to be in compliant with ICAO SARPs.
Helsinki FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States: Norway (Norway FIR/UIR), Sweden (Sweden FIR/UIR), Estonia (Tallinn FIR/UIR) and a non-ECAC State, Russia (St Petersburg FIR and Murmansk FIR).
In order to achieve some of the objectives of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan (a.k.a. the ESSIP Plan), Helsinki ACC (former Tampere ACC) co-ordinates actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 7 Released Issue
Airspace Classification and Organisation
On 27 November 2003, ICAO airspace Class C was implemented above FL 95 and the upper limit of controlled airspace was raised to FL660. AIP Finland is available at: www.ais.fi/en
ATC Units
The ATC units in the Finnish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:
ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks
En-route TMA
Helsinki ACC (EFIN)
13 EFIN
Helsinki APP 4 EFIN
Note: The number of sectors as indicated in this table is the number of technically existing sectors; some of those sectors are operationally used in combined sector formats.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 8 Released Issue
National Stakeholders
The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Finland are the following:
- Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom – the civil aviation regulatory body and NSA
- Air Navigation Services Finland Oy (ANS Finland) the main ATS-provider in Finland
- Finavia Corporation - the main airport operator in Finland
- Finnish Meteorological Institute – designated MET provider
- City of Mikkeli, operator in Mikkeli airport (EFMI) and AFIS provider
- Seinäjoki Airport Ltd., operator in Seinäjoki airport (EFSI) and AFIS provider
- Military Aviation Authority (MAA) – the military regulatory body;
- Air Force Command Finland;
- Safety Investigation Authority (SIA).
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.
Council of State
Prime Minister’sOffice
Finavia
Ministry of Justice
Safety Investigation Authority
Ministry of Transport and Communications
Finnish Transport and Communications
Agency
Air NavigationServices Finland
Finnish Meteorological
Institute (METSP)
Seinäjoki Airport
City of Mikkeli (Mikkeli Airport
ANSP)
Ministry of Defence
Defence Command Finland
Air Force Command Finland
Military Aviation Authority
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 9 Released Issue
Civil Regulator(s)
General Information
Civil Aviation in Finland is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.
Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis
Rule-making Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
Aviation Act (864/2014) and Act on the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (935/2018)
Safety Oversight Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom (NSA)
Aviation Act (864/2014) and Act on the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (935/2018)
Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements
Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
Aviation Act (864/2014), Criminal Code (39/1889)
Airspace Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
Aviation Act (864/2014)
Economic Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
Aviation Act (864/2014)
Environment Environmental permit authority Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
Permit authority according to Environmental Protection Act 527/2014 and Environmental protection decree 713/2014 grants environmental permits for airports. Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom has regulatory power in some environmental issues according to Aviation Act (864/2014).
Security Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
Aviation Act (864/2014) and Act on the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (935/2018)
Accident investigation Ministry of Justice, Safety Investigation Authority
Safety Investigation Act (525/2011)
Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom, the CAA Finland, is further detailed in the following sections.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 10 Released Issue
FINNISH CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
The Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom carry out the civil aviation regulatory tasks. It is an independent agency operating under the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC) and is organisationally separated from the Air Navigation Service Providers.
Annual Report published: N Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom doesn’t publish an annual report.
The Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom is the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in Finland.
http://www.traficom.fi/en
The current organisation chart is given in Annexes.
Air Navigation Services Finland
Services provided
Air Navigation Services Finland
Governance: State Limited Company Ownership: 100 % State owned
Services provided Y/N Comment
ATC en-route Y
ATC approach Y
ATC Aerodrome(s) Y
AIS Y
CNS Y
MET N
ATCO training Y
Others Y ANS technical services
Additional information:
Provision of services in other State(s):
N
Annual Report published: N Will be published later 2019
ANS Finland website can be found at:
https://www.ansfinland.fi/en
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 11 Released Issue
ATC systems in use
Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 -
FDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS
Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2015, EFHK 2015
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? The present Thales TopSky ATM-system is under continuous development.
ATC Unit EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 21 sites.
SDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS
Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2017, EFHK 2017
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? The present Thales TopSky ATM-system is under continuous development.
ATC Unit EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 21 sites.
Airports
General information
Finavia Corporation is the main airport operator in Finland, responsible for maintaining 21 airports, of which 19 are involved in regular traffic. Finavia Corporation is 100 % state owned enterprise. Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and the only one being co-ordinated and covered by the LSSIP.
In addition, there are three non-state-owned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Lappeenranta, Mikkeli and Seinäjoki).
Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2018 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives.
According to these criteria, the airport covered in this LSSIP is Helsinki-Vantaa airport. The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for Helsinki-Vantaa airport: https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/EFHK
1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 12 Released Issue
Military Authorities
The Military Authorities in Finland are composed of:
- Defence Command Finland; - Air Force Command Finland; - Navy Command Finland; - Army Command Finland; - Military Aviation Authority (MAA).
They are supervised by the ministry of Defence.
Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.
The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management.
Finland has an integrated civil-military ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done on basis of actual needs.
Information on the application of FUA is provided at the end of this chapter.
The current organisation chart is given in Annexes.
Regulatory role
Regulatory framework and rule-making
OAT GAT
OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?
Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?
N/A
Level of such legal provision: 1) Finnish Aviation Act 2) Aviation Regulation-series (issued by FCAA, incl. Rules of the Air) 3) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by MAA, e.g.regulations on Air Traffic Services for military aviation) 4) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by FINAF; e.g. prerogatives)
Level of such legal provision: N/A
Authority signing such legal provision: 1) Parliament/Head of State (President) 2) Director General of FCAA (DGCA Finland) 3) Director of MAA 4) Commander of Finnish Air Force
Authority signing such legal provision: N/A
These provisions cover: These provisions cover:
Rules of the Air for OAT Y
Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT
OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination
ATCO Training Y ATCO Training
ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 13 Released Issue
Oversight
Service Provision role
Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?
N/A If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate:
Certificate issued by: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?
ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification
ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision
Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability
Aircrew Licensing Y
Additional Information: The Finnish Aviation Act is binding for all civil and military aviation in Finland. Based on the Aviation Act the MAA has the right to supplement aviation regulations with official directives to such an extent that is permitted by the applicable regulations.
Additional Information:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
National AIP N National AIP
National Military AIP N National Military AIP
EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP
Other: Other:
OAT GAT
National oversight body for OAT: NSA NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A
OAT GAT
Services Provided: Services Provided:
En-Route N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) En-Route N
Approach/TMA N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) Approach/TMA N
Airfield/TWR/GND N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) Airfield/TWR/GND N
AIS N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) AIS N
MET N Finnish Meteorological Institute MET N
SAR N Civil ANSP (ANS Finland) The Military assists civil ARSC on request
SAR N
TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N
Other: Other: N
Additional Information: Additional Information: No GAT services provided by the Military
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 14 Released Issue
User role
Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?
OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT
If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:
Free Routing Within specific corridors only
Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service
If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:
No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF
CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: Few Instrument Approach Procedures only for military aviation.
Military in Finland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y
FUA Level 1 implemented: Y
FUA Level 2 implemented: Y
FUA Level 3 implemented: Y
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 15 Released Issue
2. Traffic and Capacity
Evolution of traffic in Finland
2018 Traffic in Finland increased by 8.3% during summer 2018 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in 2017.
2019-2024
The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.2% and 2.8% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.5%.
0
50.000
100.000
150.000
200.000
250.000
300.000
350.000
400.000
2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 A 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F
IFR
flig
hts
Finland - Annual IFR Movements
IFR movements - Actuals
IFR movements - Baseline forecast
IFR movements - High forecast
IFR movements - Low forecast
International Dep/Arr 59%
Domestic flights 18%
Overflights 23%
Finland - Distribution (Ref. year 2017)
A = ActualF = Forecast
2015 A 2016 A 2017 A 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 FH 7.8% 3.8% 3.3% 2.5% 2.6% 2.5% 2.2%B 0.0% -0.4% 6.4% 7.7% 2.7% 1.5% 1.1% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2%L 7.5% 1.5% -0.1% -0.1% 0.0% -0.1% 0.1%
ECAC B 1.6% 2.8% 4.0% 3.7% 3.0% 2.6% 2.1% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1%
EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2018)IFR flights yearly growth
Finland
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 16 Released Issue
Helsinki ACC (former Tampere ACC)
Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2014-2024
Performance summer 2018
Traffic Evolution 2018 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer
Capacity gap Ref value Actual
+9.3% 58 (0%) 0.07 0.00 No
The average en-route delay per remained at zero minutes per flight in summer 2018.
Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments
Start CPDLC Project Yes CPDLC implemented 6.12.2018
Maintain number of controllers Yes
MVs of most TFVs to be raised by appr. 10% in January Yes
Maximum configuration: 6 sectors No 4 sectors were sufficient
Summer 2018 performance assessment
The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 49 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 41.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 17 Released Issue
Planning Period 2019-2024 The planning focuses on the summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Following the inputs provided by the European Commission at the ad-hoc NMB on 25 October 2018, en-route delay reference values and capacity requirement profiles have been calculated for RP3 (2020-2024) based on the proposal made by the PRB to the European Commission.
Final en-route delay reference values and capacity requirement profiles will be provided after the final decision on RP3 targets.
Summer Capacity Plan
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Free Route Airspace
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
LARA tool planned implementation
Apr.2019
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Airspace Airspace re-design AIRAC April 2019, 1
new sector
Procedures
Staffing
Technical
B2B applications development
ongoing
DAPS implementation Q2
WAM implementation Q3
Capacity
Significant Events
Max Conf 5 5 5 5 5 5
Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand
Reference profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Sufficient capacity to meet demand
Annual Reference Value (min) 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06
Summer reference value (min) 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05
Additional information
En-route ATFM delay breakdownRP2 Reference Values
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 20240.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5
NETWORK
Annual
En-route ATFM delay breakdownPRB proposal
RP3 Reference Values
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 18 Released Issue
2020-2024: Indicative RP3 Reference Values
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
00:0
0
02:0
0
04:0
0
06:0
0
08:0
0
10:0
0
12:0
0
14:0
0
16:0
0
18:0
0
20:0
0
22:0
0
Sectors available - Summer 2019 - WD
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
00:0
0
02:0
0
04:0
0
06:0
0
08:0
0
10:0
0
12:0
0
14:0
0
16:0
0
18:0
0
20:0
0
22:0
0
Sectors available - Summer 2019 - WE
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 20242019 Reference Capacity Profile
2020-2024 Indicative Reference Capacity Profile 58 58 58 58 58 58
Capacity Profile - Current Routes 58 58 58 58 58 58Capacity Profile - High 58 58 58 58 58 58Capacity Profile - Low 58 58 58 58 58 58Capacity Baseline 58 582019 - 2024 Plan 58 58 58 58 58 58Capacity Profile - Shortest Routes (Open) 58 58 58 58 58 58
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Capa
city
pro
file
(mov
emen
ts p
er h
our)
EFINCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
2019-2024 Planning Period Outlook
No problems are foreseen for the ACC during the planning cycle.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 19 Released Issue
3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions
Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2018 applicable to Finland for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.
Conclusion Applicable to COLLABORATIVE FLIGHT PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION DELAYS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AND SUPPORT FOR IMPLEMENTATION FROM NM GIVEN TO THE LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS. (page 10 of the Report)
All States with delays in implementation of FCM03
State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES Description of the planned action: Full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year 2019.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 20 Released Issue
4. Implementation Projects
Present ongoing projects are mainly listed in chapter 5 – Co-operation activities and in chapter 6 – Implementation objectives.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 21 Released Issue
5. Cooperation activities
FAB Co-ordination
NEFAB FRA
The overall objective of NEFAB FRA project was implementation of unrestricted and seamless FRA within NEFAB and implementation of FRA compliant procedures in Bodø Oceanic. The final integration of all NEFAB FRA volumes into seamless continuum was completed in May 2017.
This project was executed in close cooperation with DK-SE FAB, involving the stepwise interfacing of FRA volumes in two neighbouring FABs, as described in chapter 5.2.
The NEFAB FRA will be extended with including the Helsinki TMA into FRA volume in April 2019.
The next step in NEFAB FRA development is considering the removal of ATS routes. The process was initiated with stakeholder discussions at the NEFAB Customer Consultation workshop in September 2017. The implementation will be further coordinated with each State and ANSP.
SMS Harmonisation
SMS Harmonisation project was initiated in 2016 with pilot study to specify the concrete proposals, risks and mitigation for areas of possible harmonisation on short and long term.
The overall objective of the SMS Harmonisation is to provide the appropriate support to:
- improve the total efficiency of the Safety Management Systems; - enable SMS functionalities and processes supporting cross border services; - enable for improved cost efficiency; - enable for future integration of SMS functionalities and processes.
The further harmonization process is being aligned with the implementation of the Commission IR (EU) 2017/373.
The NEFAB SMS harmonization is supporting the FAB-wide safety data exchange, aimed at systematic safety data sharing, processing and disseminating between FAB partners.
NEFAB NAV strategy
Based on the NEFAB ANSPs’ 5-year strategy, the NEFAB NAV domain mapping was done in 2018, including: - the brief description of developments and timeline in the national NAV domains; - the status of national Navigation Strategies and PBN Implementation Plans; - the estimate on possible areas of cooperation/coordination on FAB level.
The outcome will be taken into account by NEFAB States when drafting national NAV strategies.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 22 Released Issue
Regional cooperation
Regional cooperation initiatives
NEFRA
NEFAB has been closely cooperating with DK-SE FAB within an agreed concept to implement a continuous and seamless FRA from a user perspective across the two FABs. The project was named North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) Programme.
The NEFRA Programme anticipated the implementation of seamless interface between the two FABs above FL285 (because Danish-Swedish FAB FRA is above FL285). In November 2015 the first milestone of NEFRA Phase 1 was implemented with harmonized FPL rules for FRA operations across the two FABs. First step of cross-border FRA between two FABs was implemented in June 2016 with seamless FRA operations between NEFAB East (Estonia, Finland, Latvia) and DK-SE FAB. Seamless FRA interface with Norway was finalised in May 2017 allowing unrestricted FRA operation across the borders of all six states in both FABs.
FRA was also implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017.Flight planning in Bodø Oceanic is done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030.
The next NEFRA related activities, if any, have been agreed to be organised under Borealis cooperation.
Borealis FRA
The Borealis Alliance is the industrial partnership between 9 European ANSPs - LFV (Sweden), ANS Finland (Finland), Avinor (Norway), ISAVIA (Iceland), Naviair (Denmark), EANS (Estonia), IAA (Ireland), LGS (Latvia) and NATS (UK). The objective of the Alliance is to enable joint initiatives to improve flight efficiency and reduce environmental impact, delivered across the whole area in a move, which will also streamline cost of services and operational/technical infrastructure.
In 2015 Borealis Alliance initiated the Free Route Airspace (FRA) Programme to create a multi-FAB FRA by establishing interfaces between FRA areas in 3 FABs (NEFAB, DK-SE FAB and UK-IRL FAB) and Iceland. The Borealis FRA concept of operation is based on the NEFRA concept, i.e. to connect the FRA volumes of 9 States seamlessly, so that these appear as one continuous FRA to airspace users.
FINEST
FINEST programme supports the Single European Sky concept being a bi-lateral cooperation programme between Estonian ANS and ANS Finland with the main aim to provide cross-border services in adjacent airspace, ensuring the business contingency, increasing cost efficiency and sustainability of the services provided.
During 2017-2018 prepared concept of operations, cost-benefit analysis and detailed system description have given the EANS and ANS Finland Management Boards enough assurance to go further with the programme plans.
In the beginning of 2019, ANS Finland and EANS have agreed to go on with the necessary investments needed for the FINEST programme.
FINEST is expected to become operational in 2022.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 23 Released Issue
NAMCON (Northern Europe Aviation Meteorology Consortium)
National Meteorological Services (NMS) of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Norway and Sweden, as the designated MET service providers for aeronautical meteorological forecasts, launched the NAMCON co-operation in 2011 and these equal partners have worked actively together to support SES targets. The consortium co-operates with NEFAB and DK-SE FAB. More recently, work is underway with the Nordic NSA MET expert group.
NAMCON’s mission since the beginning has been to improve efficiency, reliability and access to aviation weather products and services for airspace users in Northern Europe.
Co-operation inside NAMCON includes e.g. cross-border joint production, shared production systems, harmonized MET products and OPS manuals and consolidated work on research and development to fulfill future user needs. Joint NAMCON work is also ongoing regarding compliance matters, especially preparing for EU 2017/373 requirements for MET provision.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 24 Released Issue
6. Implementation Objectives Progress
State View
Overall Objective Implementation
Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives
Finland is late in implementing Objectives AOM13.1, AOM19.1, COM10, FCM03, INF07, ITY-ACID, ITY-ADQ and ITY-FMTP. Regarding AOM13.1, implementation is planned in 2019. Regarding AOM19.1, existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by the end of 2019. Regarding COM10, basic AMHS was implemented in 2010 but delays involved in various project phases for extended AMHS have delayed full implementation, still full implementation is expected to take place during the year 2019. Regarding FCM03, ANS Finland is planning for full implementation of collaborative flight planning for the year 2019. Regarding INF07, the planning for provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data is planned for the year
2020. Regarding ITY-ACID, the operational use of ACID is planned to happen countrywide by the end of 2020 when the WAM and Mode-S sensors will cover entire Helsinki FIR. Regarding ITY-ADQ, ANS Finland has started a project to help the national implementation that is expected to take place by the end of 2020. Regarding ITY-FMTP, the common flight message transfer protocol is expected to become operational by the end of June 2019.
Other applicable objects are planned to be implemented according to the FOC dates.
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 25 Released Issue
Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature
Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annexes.
Legend:
## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF)
100% = Objective completed = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline
Optimised ATM Network Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling
65%
AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA 53%
AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data 52%
AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing
40%
AOM19.4 (PCP) Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations
10%
FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services 100%
FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 98%
FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 n/a
FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 10%
FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP 33%
FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment 10%
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 26 Released Issue
Advanced Air Traffic Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing n/a
AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace 100%
ATC02.2 STCA En-Route 100%
ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets 100%
ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs 100%
ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100%
ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring
48%
ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN
100%
ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace
n/a
ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 100%
ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer
100%
ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T Local objective 0%
ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 82%
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 0%
ITY-COTR Ground-Ground Automated Co-ordination Processes
100%
NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100%
NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations n/a
NAV10 APV procedures 100%
NAV12 Optimised Low-Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft
Local objective n/a
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 27 Released Issue
High Performing Airport Operations
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOP04.1 A-SMGCS Level 1
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100%
AOP04.2 A-SMGCS Level 2
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100%
AOP05 Airport CDM
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100%
AOP10 (PCP) Time-Based Separation
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a
AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a
AOP12 (PCP) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a
AOP13 (PCP) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) n/a
AOP14 Remote Tower Services Local objective
EFKE - KEMI-TORNIO 0%
ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management Local objective
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport 0%
SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions
100%
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 28 Released Issue
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 67%
COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 10%
COM12 (PCP) NewPENS 53%
FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 10%
INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 16%
INF08.1 (PCP) Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile
0%
ITY-ACID Aircraft Identification 50%
ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information
28%
ITY-AGDL Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services 100%
ITY-AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195
n/a
ITY-FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 92%
ITY-SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 100%
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 29 Released Issue
ICAO ASBU Implementation
The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.
These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2018 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/60 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).
Legend:
= Completed (during 2018 or before)
= Missing planning date
= Progress achieved in 2018 = Not applicable
<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
B0-APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance
100%
B0-SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A-SMGCS Level 1-2)
100%
B0-FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground-Ground Integration
100%
B0-DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management
100%
28%
B0-ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%
B0-SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground-Based Safety Nets
100%
B0-ACDM Improved Airport Operations through 100%
B0-RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)
100%
B0-FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En-Route Trajectories
100%
B0-NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide view
100%
99%
B0-ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%
B0-CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)
100%
82%
B0-TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En-Route
100%
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 30 Released Issue
Detailed Objectives Implementation progress
Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:
Completed Not yet planned
Ongoing Not Applicable
Planned Missing Data
Late
Main Objectives
AOM13.1
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
65% Late
- Implementation is planned according to the timeframe. 31/12/2019
REG (By:12/2018)
FCAA
Aviation act revised in November 2014. Conformance analysis as a part of EUROAT implementation has been completed. EUROAT implementation and publication of Country Chapter depends on the military aviation authority's decision to extend the application of the national military aviation regulations to include foreign military aircraft.
- 40%
Late
31/12/2019
Military Authority
Implementation will require changes to regulations and/or legislation in co-operation with FCAA. - 40% Late
31/12/2019 ASP (By:12/2018)
ANS Finland Implementation and training of staff planned for the year 2019 - 43% Late
31/12/2019
Military Authority MIL has no ANSP role. - %
Not Applicable
- MIL (By:12/2018) Military Authority
Implementation will require changes to regulations and/or legislation possibly in co-operation with FCAA. - 100% Completed
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 31 Released Issue
AOM19.1
ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
53% Late
- Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by 31/12/2019 31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2018)
ANS Finland Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by 31/12/2019 - 53% Late
31/12/2019
AOM19.2
ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
52% Ongoing
- LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATC-system planned by 31/12/2019, compatible with NM system 31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland
LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATC-system planned by 31/12/2019, compatible with NM system, there are still problems to be solved at Finnish Airforce branch
- 52%
Ongoing
31/12/2019
AOM19.3
Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
40% Ongoing
- LARA connection to TopSky ATC-system and full MIL-connectivity planned by 31/12/2019, enabling AOM19.3 requirements before required FOC date 31/12/2021 31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland LARA connection to TopSky ATC-system and full MIL-connectivity planned by 31/12/2019, enabling AOM19.3 requirements
- 40% Ongoing
31/12/2019
AOM19.4
Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
10% Ongoing
- Heading for FOC 31/12/2021 31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland Heading for FOC 31/12/2021 - 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 32 Released Issue
AOM21.2
Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
100% Completed
- NEFAB wide continuous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis is under construction.
12/11/2015
ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland
NEFAB wide continuous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis is under construction.
Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2)
/ Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 1 /
Borealis FRA Part 2,
Phase 2 / Borealis
Free Route Airspace (Part 1) /
NEFAB FRA / NEFAB Target
Concept / NEFRA
Phase 1 / NEFRA Phase 2
100%
Completed
12/11/2015
AOP04.1
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
100% Completed
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. 31/03/2011
REG (By:12/2010)
FCAA A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. - 100% Completed 31/03/2011
ASP (By:12/2011)
ANS Finland
A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. Currently EFHK has got A-SMGCS Level 2 with 3 SMR-s and Mode S Multilateration System. Systems fulfill agreed performance specifications and are in operational use
- 100%
Completed
31/03/2011
APO (By:12/2010) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
A-SMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. - 100% Completed
31/03/2011
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 33 Released Issue
AOP04.2
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
100% Completed
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Helsinki-Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS-system fulfills ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.2.1 specifications being A-SMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which were completed and operational in mid Jan 2018
15/01/2018
ASP (By:12/2017)
ANS Finland
Helsinki-Vantaa Airport A-SMGCS-system fulfills ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 213-1 v1.2.1 specifications being A-SMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which were completed and operational in mid Jan 2018
- 100%
Completed
15/01/2018
APO (By:12/2017) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
The equipment installed is a Mode S-based vehicle transponder with GPS-receiver - 100%
Completed
30/06/2010
AOP05
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
100% Completed
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport CDM was implemented at Helsinki-Vantaa in 2012 31/12/2012
ASP (By:12/2016)
ANS Finland CDM was implemented at Helsinki-Vantaa in 2012 - 100% Completed 31/12/2012
APO (By:12/2016) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
CDM was implemented in 2012. - 100% Completed
31/12/2012
AOP10 Time-Based Separation Timescales: - not applicable -
% Not Applicable
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Not applicable - REG (By:12/2023) ASP (By:12/2023)
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 34 Released Issue
AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: - not applicable -
% Not Applicable
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Not applicable - ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland - - % Not
Applicable -
APO (By:12/2021) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
- - % Not
Applicable -
AOP12
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: - not applicable -
% Not Applicable
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Not applicable - ASP (By:12/2020) APO (By:12/2020)
AOP13
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: - not applicable -
% Not Applicable
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
EFHK is a non PCP airport - REG (By:12/2023)
FCAA Applicability Area: 25 PCP Airports - %
Not Applicable
- ASP (By:12/2023)
ANS Finland - - % Not
Applicable -
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 35 Released Issue
ATC02.8
Ground-Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
100% Completed
- Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. MSAW processing is included in operational systems (EUROCAT). APM was implemented in 2012.
31/10/2012
ASP (By:12/2016)
ANS Finland
Ground systems upgraded to support the APW function. MSAW processing is included in operational systems (EUROCAT). APM was implemented in 2012.
- 100%
Completed
31/10/2012
ATC02.9
Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
100% Completed
- STCA in use for several years, plans for major changes not foreseen in near future 01/01/1999
ASP (By:12/2020)
ANS Finland - - 100% Completed 01/01/1999
ATC07.1
AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019
100% Completed
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Several versions of arrival Management Tools have been implemented in ACC and APP. 30/11/2005
ASP (By:12/2019)
ANS Finland
Initial arrival management tool functionality is completed since 1999 for Tampere ACC and Helsinki APP, using same equipment (MAESTRO) as in Copenhagen / Malmo. In 2005, an integrated Arrival Manager functionality has been implemented within the adjacent Helsinki / Tallinn TMAs.
- 100%
Completed
30/11/2005
ATC12.1
Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
48% Ongoing
- Original ATC12 Completed, additional ATC12.1 functionality planned and project ongoing according to the ESSIP object, taking into account NEFAB and NEFRA FRA-airspace needs. Implementation in two phases Q1/2019 and Q1/2020.
31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland
Original ATC12 Completed, additional ATC12.1 functionality planned and project ongoing according to the ESSIP object, taking into account NEFAB and NEFRA FRA-airspace needs. Implementation in two phases Q1/2019 and Q1/2020.
- 48%
Ongoing
31/12/2020
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 36 Released Issue
ATC15.1
Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019
100% Completed
- Completed in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki-Vantaa Maestro system. 31/12/2000
ASP (By:12/2019)
ANS Finland Completed in the year 2000, this feature is included in the Helsinki-Vantaa Maestro system. - 100% Completed
31/12/2000
ATC15.2
Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -
% Not Applicable
- There is no such airport in Finland which would require extended AMAN for surrounding ACC(s). Finland FIR belongs in the affected airspace from the point of Stockholm Arlanda airport. No initiative has been raised by Arlanda towards Finland FIR and thus Finland has no plan for this issue.
-
ASP (By:12/2023)
ANS Finland
There is no such airport in Finland which would require extended AMAN for surrounding ACC(s). Finland FIR belongs in the affected airspace from the point of Stockholm Arlanda airport. No initiative has been raised by Arlanda towards Finland FIR and thus Finland has no plan for this issue.
- %
Not Applicable
-
ATC17
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
100% Completed
- Fully completed and operational between Finland-Estonia 6/2014 30/06/2014
ASP (By:12/2018)
ANS Finland Fully completed and operational between Finland-Estonia 6/2014 - 100% Completed
30/06/2014
COM10
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
67% Late
- Basic AMHS implemented in 2010 but delays involved in various project phases for extended AMHS 31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2018)
ANS Finland Basic AMHS implemented in 2010 but delays involved in various project phases for extended AMHS - 67% Late
31/12/2019
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 37 Released Issue
COM11
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
10% Ongoing
- This objective is expected to be implemented within the given time frame though schedule-risks has been risen due to commercial complaints against selected manufacturer and a new tendering process is now needed
31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2020)
ANS Finland
This objective is expected to be implemented within the given time frame though schedule-risks has been risen due to commercial complaints against selected manufacturer and a new tendering process is now needed
- 10%
Ongoing
31/12/2020
COM12
New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020
53% Ongoing
- - 31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2024)
ANS Finland
ANS Finland is partner of NewPENS-project funded by INEA (INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2015/1132363 / Action 2015-EU-TM-0196-M / Activity 11) and coordinated by Eurocontrol and thereon in schedule
- 43%
Ongoing
31/12/2020
APO (By:12/2024) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
ANS Finland is representing Helsinki-Vantaa Airport. - 75% Ongoing
31/12/2020
COM12
New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020
53% Ongoing
- - 31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2024) 31/12/2020
ANS Finland
ANS Finland is partner of NewPENS-project funded by INEA (INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2015/1132363 / Action 2015-EU-TM-0196-M / Activity 11) and coordinated by Eurocontrol and thereon in schedule
- 43%
Ongoing
31/12/2020
APO (By:12/2024) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
ANS Finland is representing Helsinki-Vantaa Airport. - 75% Ongoing
31/12/2020
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 38 Released Issue
ENV01
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
82% Ongoing
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia. 31/12/2023
ASP (By:12/2023)
ANS Finland The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia.
- 78% Ongoing
31/12/2023
APO (By:12/2023) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
The CDA procedures are in use. Their usage is continuously monitored by the Environmental Unit of Finavia.
- 100% Completed
31/12/2009
FCM03
Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
98% Late
- Full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year 2019 31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2017)
ANS Finland
Functionality installed and available but problems so far at NM within automatically processing and firmly specifying the use of AFP-messages in the Free Route Airspace environment causes that full FoC implementation of collaborative flight planning is estimated to take place not before year 2019. Though all functionality has been installed according to spec, the interoperability between Thales TopSky and NM system has not been achieved due to complicated FRA operations environment, not fully covered at NM.
- 98%
Late
31/12/2019
FCM04.1
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -
% Not Applicable
- N/A -
ASP (By:10/2017)
ANS Finland N/A - % Not
Applicable -
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 39 Released Issue
FCM04.2
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
10% Ongoing
- Planning started, for Finland STAM 1 or 2 has not been a requirement before year 2016, though many of STAM 1 functionalities are operational and will form a basis for STAM 2. 31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland
Planning started, for Finland STAM 1 or 2 has not been a requirement before year 2016, though many of STAM 1 functionalities are operational and will form a basis for STAM 2.
- 10%
Ongoing
31/12/2021
FCM05
Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
33% Ongoing
- Project exist to implement the interactive rolling NOP. INEA funding is under progress, within the scope of SESAR Deployment Programme 2015. 31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021
- 10% Ongoing
31/12/2021
APO (By:12/2021) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021
- 55% Ongoing
31/12/2021
FCM06
Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
10% Ongoing
- Planned according to objective FOC. 31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland Initial research launched. - 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021
FCM08
Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
10% Ongoing
- Project started, FOC planned Q4/2021 30/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
ANS Finland Project started, FOC planned Q4/2021 - 10% Ongoing 30/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 40 Released Issue
INF07
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018
16% Late
- Planning in progress. The objective is expected to be completed by the end of 2020. 31/12/2020
REG (By:05/2018)
FCAA
A project group consisting of all relevant stakeholders has been established to create the National TOD Policy and implementation programme. Drafting of implementation programme is in progress.
- 23%
Late
31/12/2020
ASP (By:05/2018)
ANS Finland Project in progress - 10% Late 31/12/2020
APO (By:05/2018) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
Planning in progress - 10% Late
31/12/2020
INF08.1
Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2024
0% Planned
- Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 31/12/2024
ASP (By:12/2024)
ANS Finland Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 - 0% Planned 31/12/2024
Finnish Meteorological Institute
Development phase, no finalized implementation plan yet. FOC by 31/12/2024 - 0%
Not yet planned
- MIL (By:12/2024)
Military Authority MIL has no ANSP/AIS -role. - %
Not Applicable
- APO (By:12/2024) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
Planned FOC by 31/12/2024 - 0% Planned
31/12/2024
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 41 Released Issue
ITY-ACID
Aircraft Identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020
50% Late
- Planning in progress, see ASP comment. 30/11/2020
ASP (By:01/2020)
ANS Finland
Project in progress, the A/C link and ACID capability is technically ready (DAPS, Downlinked Aircraft ParameterS) for ATM-system TopSky. The operational use of ACID is planned to happen country wide by 31/11/2020 when the WAM and Mode-S sensors will cover entire Finland FIR. With WAM system there has been delays due to financial problems of the system provider.
- 50%
Late
30/11/2020
ITY-ADQ
Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017
28% Late
- The requirements of this objective have been postponed until forecasted FoC 12/2020 31/12/2020
REG (By:06/2017)
FCAA The requirements of this objective have been extremely challenging to meet, it is estimated that implementation will not take place until 12/2020.
- 62% Late
31/12/2020
ASP (By:06/2017)
ANS Finland
ANS Finland has started FAIMS project, covering the ITY-ADQ requirements, planned implementation by Q2/2020. System fulfills ADQ requirements for aeronautical information management and production of AIP. It also provides data origination tools for other parties. However, the other parties are not directly involved in the FAIMS project.
- 27%
Late
30/06/2020
APO (By:06/2017) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
- - 10% Late
30/06/2019
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 42 Released Issue
ITY-AGDL
Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020
100% Completed
- ANS Finland has informed 24.11.2017 delays to SESAR Deployment Manager (SDM) concerning the installation time and the reasons of delays. Due to delivery time of needed systems and busy with other customers both of the Telecommunication (Datalink) service providers were not able to deliver needed systems during the required time frame. ANS Finland is aware of this regulation and actions have been planned to fulfill the regulation requirements. Relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by ANS Finland. ARINC-services are believed to become available not before than Q2/2020.
01/01/2019
REG (By:02/2018)
FCAA
ANS Finland has informed 24.11.2017 delays to SESAR Deployment Manager (SDM) concerning the installation delays. Relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by ANS Finland.
- 100%
Completed
31/12/2018
ASP (By:02/2018)
ANS Finland
The A/G radiolink service, will be hired from ARINC and SITA. SITA service is running, ARINC has not yet confirmed if this can be done by Q4/2019 but more likely Q2/2020
- 100%
Completed
31/12/2018
MIL (By:01/2019) Military Authority
25% of transport-type State aircraft have been equipped. No intention/plan for further updates. - 100% Completed
01/01/2019
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 43 Released Issue
ITY-AGVCS2
8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020
% Not Applicable
- Finland has notified the European Commission of temporary derogations from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 on 12.12.2016. The Finnish Transport Safety Agency grants exemptions from the requirements in Articles 4(5) 31.12.2027, 5(4) 1.1.2028 and 6(10) 31.12.2028. Approval of derogations from commission by letter received 08/08/2018.
-
REG (By:12/2018)
FCAA The requirements have been implemented within the timeframe of the notification to the EC. - 100% Completed
31/12/2018 ASP (By:12/2018)
Military Authority MIL has no service provision role. - %
Not Applicable
-
ANS Finland ITY-AGVCS2: 8,33 kHz radio-ready 100 % at Q1/2019, FOC gradually by 12/2027 as granted by Regulator. - %
Not Applicable
- MIL (By:12/2020) Military Authority
All aircraft that will be in use after implementation date are equipped with 8,33kHz radios. - 100% Completed
31/12/2017 APO (By:12/2018)
Military Authority MIL has no service provision/APO role. - %
Not Applicable
- HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
ITY-AGVCS2: 8,33 kHz radio-ready 100 % at Q1/2019, FOC gradually by 12/2027 as granted by Regulator. - %
Not Applicable
-
ITY-FMTP
Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014
92% Late
- Planned operational by 30 Jun 2019, delayed due to lack of resources. 30/06/2019
ASP (By:12/2014)
ANS Finland Planned operational by 30 Jun 2019, delayed due to lack of resources. - 92% Late
30/06/2019 MIL (By:12/2014)
Military Authority
Integrated civil-military airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. - %
Not Applicable
-
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 44 Released Issue
ITY-SPI
Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADS-B Out in transport-type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transport-type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020
100% Completed
- The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. All REG and ASP SloAs are completed. Remaining SloAs will be completed within the timeframe of the regulation.
31/12/2018
REG (By:02/2015)
FCAA The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. - 100% Completed
31/12/2014 ASP (By:02/2015)
ANS Finland
The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. (In the preceding LSSIPs there were texts about plans to introduce WAM-systems but due to various technical and commercial problems, the plans have been halted so far)
- 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
MIL (By:06/2020)
Military Authority
MIL has no role in ANSP/surveillance capability issues. All transport type aircraft have MODE S -capabilities and will be updated to ADS-B OUT within timescale.
- 100% Completed
31/12/2018
NAV03.1
RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
100% Completed
- P-RNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. 31/12/2005
ASP (By:12/2023)
ANS Finland
P-RNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. The feasibility and benefits from P-RNAV in other Finnish TMAs, and furthermore in the joint adjacent Helsinki/Tallinn TMAs has been assessed in 2005 and P-RNAV routes have been implemented.
- 100%
Completed
31/12/2005
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 45 Released Issue
NAV03.2
RNP 1 in TMA Operations (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -
% Not Applicable
- - -
ASP (By:12/2023)
ANS Finland
Planned but FoC date is not known. However, Helsinki-Vantaa is not among the PCP airports, so, actually this Object is Not Applicable for EFHK
- 0%
Planned
31/12/2023
NAV10
RNP Approach Procedures with Vertical Guidance Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
100% Completed
- APV/Baro VNAV procedures will be published by the end of year 2016. 30/11/2016
REG (By:12/2023)
FCAA Finland applies criteria published by EASA. Specifically, AMC 20-26 and AMC 20-27. - 100% Completed
25/08/2016 ASP (By:12/2023)
ANS Finland - - 100% Completed 30/11/2016
SAF11
Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018
100% Completed
- Finland is compliant with the relevant parts of EAPPRE. 31/12/2015
REG (By:01/2018)
FCAA The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions have been implemented utilizing the Finnish Aviation Safety Plan.
- 100% Completed
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2014)
ANS Finland Requirements fulfilled during 2014. - 100% Completed 31/12/2014
APO (By:12/2014) HELSINKI-VANTAA Airport
Requirements fulfilled during 2014. - 100% Completed
31/12/2014
Military Authority
MIL has no service provision/APO role. Applicable measures of the action plan concerning aircraft operators have been implemented.
- 100% Completed
31/12/2014
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 46 Released Issue
Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring
AOM21.1
Direct Routing (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: - not applicable -
% Not Applicable
- NEFAB wide continues FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL95 to FL660. -
ASP (By:12/2017)
ANS Finland - - % Not
Applicable -
ATC02.2
Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en-route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013
100% Completed
- Implemented in 2012. 30/04/2012
ASP (By:01/2013)
ANS Finland Implemented in 2012 - 100% Completed 30/04/2012
ATC16
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
100% Completed
- The requirements stemming from Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 of 16 December 2011 laying down common airspace usage requirements and operating procedures for airborne collision avoidance have been implemented in Finland.
31/12/2015
REG (By:12/2015)
FCAA All REG SloA's are completed. - 100% Completed 31/12/2015
ASP (By:03/2012)
ANS Finland Training completed in 2012. ACAS performance monitoring has been in place since 2008. - 100% Completed
31/05/2012 MIL (By:12/2015)
Military Authority
Transport type -aircraft equipped with TCAS II 7.0 or TCAS I. No update planned. ACAS II functionalities are trained during flight cadets training for tactical aircraft.
- 100% Completed
31/03/2012
FCM01
Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006
100% Completed
- Objective has been completed. 30/11/2010
ASP (By:07/2014)
ANS Finland Completed 2010 - 100% Completed 30/11/2010
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 47 Released Issue
ITY-COTR
Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012
100% Completed
- The system requirements derived from the regulations 1032/2006 and 30/2009 are expected to be finalized within the timeframe of the regulations. 30/12/2012
ASP (By:12/2012)
ANS Finland Planned according to the regulations (1032/2006, 29/2009 and 30/2009). - 100% Completed
30/12/2012 MIL (By:12/2012)
Military Authority
Integrated civil-military airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. - %
Not Applicable
-
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 48 Released Issue
Local Objectives
Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.
AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local % Planned
EFKE - KEMI-TORNIO The possibility to implement remote aerodrome ATS in some of the small aerodromes will be investigated further, KEMI-TORNIO just mentioned as one candidate. 31/12/2022
ATC18 Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local
% Planned
- Under investigation, feasibility study ongoing whether a project should be initiated 31/12/2023
ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Applicability and timescale: Local % Completed
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Finavia's co-operation with operators is continuous. Procedures are planned according to environmental etc. demands. 31/12/2012
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local % Ongoing
EFHK - Helsinki Vantaa Airport Approximately 70% of departures are CCO 31/12/2019
NAV12 Optimised Low-Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Applicability and timescale: Local
% Not Applicable
- Not Applicable, no IFR routes published for Rotorcraft -
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 49 Released Issue
ANNEXES
Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Finland
LSSIP Co-ordination
LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name
LSSIP National Focal Point Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
Jouko RANTA
LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
Jouko RANTA
LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Air Navigation Services Finland Pekka VIRTANEN
LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Finavia Corporation Heikki ISOMAA
LSSIP Focal Point for Military Military Aviation Authority Heikki KUORELAHTI and Timo VÄHÄMÄKI
LSSIP Focal Point for MET SP Finnish Meteorological Institute Jaakko NUOTTOKARI and Terhi NIKKANEN
EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support
Function Directorate Name
LSSIP Contact Person DECMA/ACS/PRM Luca DELL’ORTO
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 50 Released Issue
National stakeholders’ organisation charts
Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 51 Released Issue
Finavia Corporation
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 52 Released Issue
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 53 Released Issue
Air Navigation Services Finland
CEO
Supportingfunctions
Operationalplanning and
operative ATC-units
Technical planningand operations
Safety and Compliance
Annual meeting of shareholders
Board
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 54 Released Issue
Finnish Meteorological Institute
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 55 Released Issue
Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR, ICAO and DP
Objective SESAR
Key Feature ICAO ASBU B0 and B1
DP Family
AOM13.1
- -
AOM19.1 B1-FRTO B1-NOPS
3.1.1 ASM Tool to support AFUA
AOM19.2 B1-FRTO B1-NOPS
3.1.2 ASM management of real time airspace data
AOM19.3 B1-FRTO B1-NOPS
3.1.3 Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing
AOM19.4 B1-FRTO B1-NOPS
3.1.4 Management of dynamic airspace configurations
AOM21.1
B0-FRTO -
AOM21.2 B1-FRTO 3.2.1 Upgrade of ATM systems to support Direct Routing and Free Routing 3.2.4 Implement Free Route Airspace
AOP04.1
B0-SURF 2.2.1 A-SMGCS level 1 and 2
AOP04.2
B0-SURF 2.2.1 A-SMGCS level 1 and 2
AOP05
B0-ACDM B0-RSEQ
2.1.1 Initial DMAN 2.1.3 Basic A-CDM
AOP10
B1-RSEQ 2.3.1 Time Based Separation (TBS)
AOP11
B1-ACDM 2.1.4 Initial Airport Operations Plan (AOP)
AOP12 - 2.1.2 Electronic Flight Strips (EFS) 2.5.1 Airport Safety Nets associated with A-SMGCS level 2 2.5.2
AOP13
B1-ACDM B1-RSEQ
2.4.1 A-SMGCS Routing and Planning Functions
AOP14
B1-RATS -
ATC02.2 B0-SNET -
ATC02.8 B0-SNET B1-SNET
3.2.1 Upgrade of ATM systems to support Direct Routing and Free Routing
ATC02.9 B0-SNET B1-SNET
-
ATC07.1
B0-RSEQ 1.1.1 Basic AMAN
ATC12.1
B1-FRTO 3.2.1 Upgrade of ATM systems to support Direct Routing and Free Routing
ATC15.1
B1-RSEQ 1.1.2 AMAN upgrade to include Extended Horizon function
ATC15.2
B1-RSEQ 1.1.2 AMAN upgrade to include Extended Horizon function
ATC16 B0-ACAS -
ATC17
- 3.2.1 Upgrade of ATM systems to support Direct Routing and Free Routing
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 56 Released Issue
ATC18
- No direct link, although implementation is recommended in Family 3.2.1
COM10
- -
COM11 - 3.1.4 Management of Dynamic Airspace Configurations 3.2.1 Upgrade of systems (NM, ANSPs, AUs) to support Direct Routings (DCTs) and Free Routing Airspace (FRA)
COM12
B1-SWIM
5.1.2 NewPENS: New Pan-European Network Service 5.2.1 Stakeholders Internet Protocol Compliance
ENV01 B0-CDO B1-CDO
-
ENV02
- -
ENV03
B0-CCO -
FCM01 B0-NOPS -
FCM03
B0-NOPS 4.2.3 Interface ATM systems to NM systems
FCM04.1
- 4.1.1 STAM phase 1
FCM04.2
B0-NOPS 4.1.2 STAM phase 2
FCM05 B1-ACDM B1-NOPS
4.2.2 Interactive Rolling NOP 4.2.4 AOP/NOP Information Sharing
FCM06
B1-NOPS 4.4.2 Traffic Complexity tools
FCM07 B1-NOPS 4.3.1 - Target Time for ATFCM purposes 4.3.2 - Reconciled target times for ATFCM and arrival sequencing
FCM08
B1-FICE 4.2.3 Interface ATM systems to NM systems
FCM09
B1-NOPS -
INF04 B0-DATM -
INF07
- 1.2.2 Geographical database for procedure design
INF08.1 B1-DATM B1-SWIM
5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1, 5.6.1
INF08.2 B1-DATM B1-SWIM
5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.6.2
ITY-ACID
- -
ITY-ADQ
B0-DATM 1.2.2 Geographical database for procedure design
ITY-AGDL
B0-TBO
6.1.1 ATN B1 based services in ATSP domain 6.1.3 A/G and G/G Multi Frequency DL Network in defined European Service Areas 6.1.4 ATN B1 capability in Multi Frequency environment in Aircraft Domain
ITY-AGVCS2
- -
ITY-COTR B0-FICE -
ITY-FMTP B0-FICE B1-FICE
-
ITY-SPI
B0-ASUR -
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 57 Released Issue
NAV03.1 B0-CDO B0-CCO
B1-RSEQ -
NAV03.2 B1-RSEQ 1.2.3 RNP 1 Operations in high density TMAs (ground capabilities) 1.2.4 RNP 1 Operations (aircraft capabilities)
NAV10 B0-APTA 1.2.1 RNP APCH with vertical guidance 1.2.2 Geographic Database for procedure design
NAV12
B1-APTA -
SAF11
- -
Legend:
Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:
Optimised ATM Network Services
High Performing Airport Operations
Advanced Air Traffic Services
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
LSSIP Year 2018 Finland 58 Released Issue
Glossary of abbreviations
This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Finland.
Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in:
https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/Glossaries.pdf
Term Description
AF ATM Functionality
FT Fast Track
PCP Pilot Common Project
PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme
NEFAB North European Functional Airspace Block
NEFRA North European Free Route Airspace
S-AF Sub ATM Functionality
SIA Safety Investigation Authority
SNAB Strategic Nordic Military ATM Board