Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) ITALY - Eurocontrol · Year 2014 - Level 1 Local Single Sky...

Year 2014 - Level 1

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) ITALY

EUROCONTROL

LSSIP Year 2014 Italy Released Issue

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP Year 2014 - Italy

Infocentre Reference: 15/01/12-22

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2014

LSSIP Year 2014 Italy Edition Date: 28.05.2015

LSSIP Focal Point – Mariagrazia La Piscopia E-mail: [email protected] ENAV S.p.A.

LSSIP Contact Person - Bernd Hill E-mail: [email protected] Unit DPS/PEPR

Status Intended for

Working Draft General Public

Draft Agency Stakeholders

Proposed Issue Restricted Audience

Released Issue

Accessible via: Internet (http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/italy)

Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Italy (IT) - BH\IT_Year 2014\IT_LSSIP2014_Released Document\LSSIP_Year2014_IT_Released.docx

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material

2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2013 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

3 ESSIP Report 2012 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

4 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

5 Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

6 European ATM Master Plan https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

8 AIP ITALIA http://www.enav.it/portal/page/portal/PortaleENAV/Home/AIP

9 BLUE MED Performance Plan

http://bluemed.aero


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2014 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan. – Edition 2014.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1

Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5

National ATM Environment ........................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 1 -1.1 Geographical Scope ...................................................................................................................... 6

1.1.1 International Membership .......................................................................................................... 6 1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) ..................................................................................... 7 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ................................................................................. 8

1.2 National Stakeholders ................................................................................................................. 11 1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.2.2 ENAV S.p.A.. ........................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Airports .................................................................................................................................... 17 1.2.4 Military Authorities ................................................................................................................... 17

Traffic and Capacity ................................................................................................................. 21 Chapter 2 -2.1 Evolution of traffic in Italy ............................................................................................................ 21

2.1.1 Performance summer 2014 ..................................................................................................... 21 2.1.2 Planning Period 2015-2019 ..................................................................................................... 21

2.2 BRINDISI ACC ............................................................................................................................ 22 2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 22 2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 22 2.2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer .................................................................................... 23

2.3 MILAN ACC ................................................................................................................................. 25 2.3.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 25 2.3.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 25 2.3.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer .................................................................................... 26

2.4 PADOVA ACC ............................................................................................................................. 28 2.4.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 28 2.4.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 28 2.4.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer .................................................................................... 29

2.5 ROME ACC ................................................................................................................................. 31 2.5.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 31 2.5.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 31 2.5.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer .................................................................................... 32

ESSIP Report recommendations ............................................................................................. 34 Chapter 3 -

National Projects ...................................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 4 -

Regional Co-ordination ............................................................................................................ 39 Chapter 5 -5.1 FAB Co-ordination ....................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 FAB Projects ............................................................................................................................... 39 5.3 Regional cooperation .................................................................................................................. 43

5.3.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives ............................................................................................. 43 5.3.2 Regional Projects .................................................................................................................... 44

ESSIP Objective Implementation ............................................................................................. 45 Chapter 6 -

ANNEXES

LSSIP Year 2014 Italy 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

Italy is one of the funding member of European Union and member of EUROCONTROL since 1996.

The separation between the regulatory and the ATM service provider functions is effectively in place in Italy since 2004.

ENAC, the Italian Civil Aviation Authority, has been appointed as regulator and National Supervisory Authority in November 2004 with dedicated law 265/2004. This appointment has been included in the new version of basic code of Air Law (change to Italian Navigation Code) in Italy - issued in June 2005 -. ENAC is also responsible for the regulation for environmental matters in ATM.

ENAV is the Company designated by the Italian State for the management and control of general air traffic (GAT) in Italy.

Entirely controlled by the Ministry of Economy and Finance and supervised by the Ministry of Infrastructures and Transport, ENAV S.p.A. is a result of the transformation of the National Agency for Flight Assistance into a joint-stock Company which occurred in 2001, after the previous transformation into a State-Controlled Enterprise in 1996.

Italian Air Force (ITAF) reports to the Ministry of Defence. ITAF has adapted its organisational structure in order to generate functional separation between the high level body Air Force Staff (SMA USAM – Ufficio Generale Spazio Aereo e Meteorologia) accountable for services’ internal supervision and the units responsible for the provision of Air Navigation Services (Major Commands).

In accordance with the European Community Regulation 550/2004, article 7, paragraph 5, the Italian Air Force is authorised to provide ATS, CNS and MET Services to General Air Traffic (GAT) without certification.

ANS to GAT are provided by ITAF under the supervision of ENAC and in accordance with a special agreement signed by the two organizations.

Traffic and Capacity

Traffic in Italy increased by 2.7% during Summer 2014 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2013. The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.7% and 3.9%, with a baseline growth of 2.4% for Italy during the planning cycle 2015-2019.

As a result of the ACC’s reorganisation in 2014, no problems are foreseen for Brindisi, Milano, Padova and Rome during the planning cycle 2015-2019. Capacity enhancement measures planned are in the order of fine tuning the capacity already existing in the system and to support any possible improvement in Flight Efficiency.


ESSIP Objective Implementation

The implementation of ESSIP 2014 objectives in Italy is properly progressing. Almost all the objectives are linked to national investment plans and in line with European deadlines.

Some objectives are declared to be Late for different reasons:

ATC02.2, ATC02.5, ATC02.6 and ATC02.7 are planned be completed according to the schedule;

The declared delay for COM09 is due to the necessary alignment with related FMTP actions;

COM10 implementation has been delayed due to AMHS migration project;

INF04 implementation has been delayed due to the review of the requirements of the related project;

ITY-AGDL implementation is actually in delay. By the way, the amendment to DLS regulation and the postponement of deadline will allow the implementation in due date;

ITY-COTR will be fully implemented in accordance to DLS dates because some SLoAs are linked this last service;

ITY-FMTP will be implemented shortly with the migration to IPV6;

NAV03 delay is due to P-RNAV SID/STAR implementation and related ATCOs training that will be finalised by 2015;

Airport objectives:

AOP04.1 is currently under the remit of a dedicated working group

ENV01 will be completed with improved P-RNAV procedures tailored for the application of CDO with CDO level windows by 2015. Anyhow, currently, CDO are tactically implemented under radar vectoring.

There is also an objective declared No Plan, ATC07.1 (Basic AMAN), whose requirements are going to be undertaken in the frame of ATC15 (Extended AMAN).

With respect to the edition 2013, different planned or not planned objectives have been advanced or achieved.

For the majority of those declared Late the delay is not critical.

Moreover, in 2014 ENAV has run a re-organisation of the Italian airspace in terms of re-alignment of ACCs areas of responsibility.

This operational plan is expected to bring benefits in:

• Capacity

• Punctuality

• Flight efficiency

Re-organization of ACC’s areas of responsibility is allowing a more optimum route structure through the Italian FIR/UIR and supporting the improvement of Capacity and Environmental results for the achievement of the targets established in the Italian Performance Plan for RP1 and RP2.


LSSIP 2014 - Italy * FOC Date █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

State-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2008

20

09

2010

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

2016

20

17

2018

20

19

2020

20

21

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling [IDP] [E] *

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [IDP] [E] * AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [IDP] [E] *AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions [IDP] * ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term

Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 [E] *

ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 [E] *

ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 [E] *

ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 [E] *

ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E] * ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and

conformance monitoring [E] *

ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations

[IDP] [E] *

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to

Controller during Coordination and Transfer [IDP] [E] *

COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)

[IDP] * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in

ATM *FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E] * FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [IDP] [E] * FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase

1 [IDP] [E] * FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [IDP] [E] * INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) *ITY-ACID Aircraft identification ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical

information [E] *ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [IDP] [E] * ITY-AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing

requirements below FL195 *

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes [E] *

ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability *NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV [E] * NAV10 Implement APV procedures [IDP] [E] * SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft

operations caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions *SRC-RLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory

Requirements (ESARRs) SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies


Airport-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2008

20

09

2010

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

2016

20

17

2018

20

19

2020

20

21

LIMC-Milan - Malpensa

AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1

[E] * AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and

Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 *AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] [E] * ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO)

techniques for environmental improvements [IDP] *

ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports *

LIML-Milan - Linate






LIPZ-Venezia






LIRF-Roma - Fiumicino






Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partly Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable (Italy does not participate in this obj.)

Late

E= Essential – Master Plan Reference IDP = Interim Deployment Programme

NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2014 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2014.

The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;

Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;

Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


National ATM Environment Chapter 1 -

This document is reporting on the current situation of ATM system performances and the necessary actions taken or required to achieve full compliance with the Single European Sky Regulations for Italy.

Italy’s Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP) 2014 sets out the medium term plans and implementation activities pursued by the Italian stakeholders to achieve the Implementation Objectives reported in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan 2014.

1.1 Geographical Scope

1.1.1 International Membership

Italy is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

CANSO 1996 (founding member)

ECAC 1996 (founding member)

EUROCAE 2009

EUROCONTROL 1996

European Union 1957(founding member)

EASA 2003

ICAO 1949

NATO 1949 (founding member)

SESAR Joint Undertaking 2009


1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses the three Italian FIRs (Brindisi UIR/FIR, Milan UIR/FIR, Rome UIR/FIR) as established by the relevant ICAO Regional Air Navigation Agreements. The division flight level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL 195.

Italian UIRs/FIRs are surrounded by UIRs/FIRs of 10 States, namely France (Marseille), Switzerland (Genève, Zurich), Austria (Wien), Slovenia (Ljubljana), Croatia (Zagreb), Serbia (Belgrade), Albania (Tirana), Greece (Athens), Malta (Malta) and Tunisia (Tunis) which is a non-ECAC bordering state.


1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation

Italian airspace is divided vertically in:

UPPER airspace, above FL 195;

LOWER airspace, from GND to FL 195 included.

The LOWER airspace is divided into three Flight Information Regions (Milano FIR, Roma FIR and Brindisi FIR); airspace above FIR is defined as belonging to Upper Flight Information Regions (UIRs).

Starting from 23rd December 2004 Italian airspace from FL195 excluded up to FL460, is categorised as ICAO “C”.

The Italian Upper Airspace, identified by Brindisi, Milano and Roma UIRs, has been divided in two parts differently classified:

from above FL 195 to FL 460 class “C”

above FL 460 class “G”

The Italian Lower Airspace is classified “G” with the exception of other airspaces, differently classified due to the air traffic service provided, (e.g. TMA, AWY, ADR, CTR under ENAV or military jurisdiction and ATZ of controlled aerodromes within CTR).


Four TMAs exist in Italian FIR: Milano, Roma, Padova and Brindisi, with the following characteristics and airspace classification:

TMA Brindisi

FL195 included llCLASS “A”ll

FL115 excluded

FL115 included llCLASS “E”ll

4000 FT AMSL or 1500 FT AGL whichever is higher

TMA Milano (Zone 1) FL195 included

llCLASS “A”ll 2500 FT AMSL or 1500 FT AGL whichever is higher


llCLASS “D”ll FL95 included


llCLASS “D”ll 5000 FT AMSL





TMA Padova FL195 included

llCLASS “D”ll FL115 excluded

FL195 included llCLASS “E”ll

4500 FT AMSL or 1500/3000 FT AGL whichever is higher *

* (for details see AIP Italy – ENR 2.1.1)

TMA Roma FL195 included

llCLASS “A”ll 2500 FT AMSL or 1500 FT AGL whichever is higher

Italian CTRs are divided in CTRs under ENAV jurisdiction and CTRs under the jurisdiction of Italian Air Force (ITAF). In both cases air traffic services are provided on the basis of the classification of the CTR airspace.

CTRs under ENAV JURISDICTION:

According to AIC 2/2013 reclassification of ENAV CTR from class “C” to class “D” has been completed by the end of 2014; CTR under ENAV jurisdiction are classified “D” and listed below:

Alghero, Ancona, Bari, Bergamo, Bologna, Firenze, Genova, Grottaglie, Lamezia, Linate, Lugano, Malpensa (from GND to 2500 FT) *, Napoli, Olbia, Palermo, Pantelleria, Parma, Perugia, Pescara, Reggio Calabria, Roma, Ronchi dei Legionari, Torino, Venezia and Verona.

* Malpensa CTR is classified “A” from 2500 FT excluded to 5500 FT ( Zona 2) and from 1500 FT excluded to 2500 FT ( Zona 1)


CTRs under MILITARY JURISDICTION*:

Cagliari, Gioia del Colle, Pisa and Trapani from FL 195 to upper limit are classified: “C”.

Amendola, Aviano, Brindisi, Cagliari, Catania, Frosinone, Gioia del Colle, Grazzanise, Grosseto, Latina, Lecce, Piacenza, Pisa, Romagna, Trapani and Treviso from lower limit up to upper limit or FL 195 are classified: “D”. * (for details see AIP Italy – ENR2.1.2)

ATZ

ATZ of controlled aerodromes located within CTR adopt the same classification of the CTR.

The following ATZ of controlled aerodromes, not located in CTRs and subject to special regulation, are classified “G”: Viterbo, Roma/Guidonia, Roma/Urbe and Luni/Sarzana.

Cuneo Levaldigi ATZ is classified “D” when aerodrome control service is provided; “G” in other periods.

ATZ of uncontrolled aerodromes are classified “G”.


1.2 National Stakeholders

The main ATM National Stakeholders are:

1. Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile (ENAC)/Civil Aviation and National Supervisory Authority;

2. Aeronautica Militare (AM)/Italian Air Force (ITAF) – Military Authority;

3. ENAV SpA Società Nazionale per l’Assistenza al Volo/Italian Company for Air Navigation Services;

4. Airport Operators (AdR Aeroporti di Roma, SAVE S.p.A, SEA Aeroporti Milano).

Furthermore, there is an independent Investigation Authority (Agenzia Nazionale per la Sicurezza del Volo, ANSV), reporting directly to the Prime Minister, which is responsible for accident and serious incident investigations.

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.


1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)

1.2.1.1 General information

Civil Aviation in Italy is the responsibility of the Ministry of Infrastructures and Transports. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The NSA’s are further detailed in the following sections.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible

Legal Basis

Rule-making EU and/or ENAC Art. 2 of D.Lgs. 25 luglio 1997, n. 250. Istituzione dell'Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (E.N.A.C.)

Safety Oversight ENAC Art. 687 of Codice della Navigazione

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

ENAC Art. 687 of Codice della Navigazione

Airspace ENAC, ITAF. ENAV Art. 687 of Codice della Navigazione

DPR 90/2010

Economic Ministry of Economy and Finance / M of IT and ENAC review annually ANS charges in cooperation with Ministry Economy and Finance and Ministry of Defence

Art. 687 of Codice della Navigazione

Environment Ministry of the Environment / ENAC

Art. 687 of Codice della Navigazione

Security Ministy of Interior and Ministry of Defence, ENAC

Accident investigation Agenzia Nazionale per la Sicurezza del Volo (ANSV)

Legislative decree n. 66 of the 25th of February 1999

Safety oversight of ANS to civil flights by military units is performed by ITAF according to the MOU signed on 22 September 2014, between ENAC, on behalf of Minister of Transport, and ITAF, on behalf of Minister of Defence.


1.2.1.2 ENAC

ENAC, the Italian Civil Aviation Authority, has been appointed as regulator and National Supervisory Authority for ATM/ANS in November 2004 with dedicated law 265/2004. This appointment has been included in the basic code of Air Law (change to Italian Navigation Code) in Italy - issued in June 2005 - thus completely implementing the separation of regulation and safety oversight from the service provision. ENAC is also responsible for the regulation for environmental matters in ATM.

ENAC is under the supervision of the Ministry of Infrastructures and Transports, which remains responsible for the Italian civil aviation policy.

Historically ENAC, founded in 1997, had indeed been the Civil Aviation Authority responsible for airworthiness matters, aircraft maintenance, organisations and technical personnel approval, aircrew licensing, airport construction, building and operation, as well as the Authority supervising the safety and issuing certificates and licences to Aircraft Operators.

Being responsible for Airport Regulation, in 2002, ENAC issued a national Regulation for oversight and certification of Airport Operators on the basis of ICAO Annex 14.

Italian Territory is divided into Airport Districts (“Circoscrizioni Aeroportuali”) each one headed by an Airport Director which performs various regulatory and administrative tasks, and in particular the coordination between State agencies operating on the airport (Police, Custom Services, Fire fighting Services) and the airport operators.

Most of the Italian airports are managed by airport operators, responsible for airport operations and safety, under total concession by ENAC. The relevant air traffic services are provided by either ENAV S.p.A., or ITAF (Italian Air Force), or the same airport operators in few minor airports (AFIS services).

The Ministry of Economy acts as economic regulator by giving the final approval of the proposed user charges, however the well consolidated SES regulation on charging schemes assigns to the NSA the oversight on user charge definition process.

Annual Report published: Y http://www.enac.gov.it/repository/ContentManagement/information/N2131996710/ENAC_Rapporto_Bilancio_Sociale_2013_perweb2.pdf

Further information about ENAC is provided on the following web site: http://www.enac.gov.it/

The Organisation chart of ENAC is shown in Annex B.


1.2.2 ENAV S.p.A..

Air Navigation Services (ANS) in Italy for GAT are provided by ENAV S.p.A. within the Airspace respectively assigned by National Law. Entirely controlled by the Ministry of Economy and Finance and supervised by the Ministry of Infrastructures and Transport, ENAV S.p.A. is the result of the transformation of the National Agency for Flight Assistance into a joint-stock Company which occurred in 2001, after the previous transformation into a State-Controlled Enterprise in 1996.

Name of the ANSP: ENAV S.p.A

Governance: Joint-Stock Public Company

Ownership: 100% State owned and controlled by the Ministry of Economy and Finance and supervised by the Ministry of Infrastructures and Transport

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET Y

ATCO training Y

Others Y APRON management shared with Airport Operators

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y Austria, Switzerland, France, Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia

Annual Report published: Y http://www.enav.it/portal/page/portal/PortaleENAV/Home_EN/ChiSiamo_EN?CurrentPath=/enav/en/aboutus/an This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP.

Every 3 years ENAV signs specific programme and service contracts with the Ministry of Economy and Finance, which acts also as economic regulator, by approving the proposed user charges.

ENAV web address is: www.enav.it.

The Organisation chart of ENAV is shown in Annex B.


1.2.2.1 ATC system in use

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX

Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015 Yes, the following changes are planned • MTCD implementation • Data link implementation • HMI Integrated Label (Mode S and Data

Link integration) •

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2018

1.2.2.2 ATC units

The ATC units in the Italian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route TMA

Brindisi ACC 5 + 2 FIC Brindisi FIR/UIR, Roma FIR/UIR, Brindisi TMA2.

ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within and over Brindisi FIR/UIR and TMA, plus part of the South Eastern airspace of Rome FIR/UIR GND to FL 305

Milano ACC 13 + 2 FIC 63

Western part of Milano FIR/UIR, Milano TMA2, Linate CTR, Malpensa CTR, Bergamo CTR, Lugano CTR.

ATC + FIS service: Western part of Milano FIR/UIR from GND to FL 315

Padova ACC 13 + 2 FIC

Eastern part of Milano FIR/UIR, Roma FIR (around FRZ VORTAC and ANC VOR), Padova TMA2.

ATC + FIS service: Eastern part of Milano UIR/FIR from GND to UNL plus part of Roma FIR around FRZ VORTAC GND to FL 195

Roma ACC 14+ 2 FIC 64 Roma FIR/UIR, Milano FIR/UIR, Roma TMA2, Roma CTR.

ATC + FIS service: f Roma FIR/UIR, except part of the South Eastern airspace of Rome FIR/UIR GND to FL 305 managed by Brindisi plus part of the western airspace over Milano UIR (above FL 315and part of Milano FIR around PIS VOR)

1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) 2 There are no specific ATC units for the Italian TMAs: in fact, the relevant ATS functions are performed by the respective ACCs, within which specific ATC sectors play an APP role or a combined En-Route/APP role. 3 APP for LIMC, LIME, LIML, LSZA. 4 APP for LIRF, LIRA and LIRU (Roma CTR).


Military ATS units (authorized to provide ATS to GAT without certification by the NSA) are directly responsible for the provision of ATC services to several airports and CTRs located within airspace under military jurisdiction in line with Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1108/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 in the field of aerodromes, air traffic management and air navigation services and repealing Directive 2006/23/EC and in line with Regulation 550/2004, article 7, paragraph 5.

The ITAF ATC Units handling Civil Aviation flights are:

ITAF ATC Unit Maximum

number of ATC positions in Ops

Associated Airspace Remarks

Brindisi X CTR + ATZ Brindisi APP/TWR service

Ciampino5 X ATZ Ciampino TWR service

Decimomannu X CTR Cagliari APP service to Cagliari

Istrana X CTR Treviso + ATZ Treviso APP/TWR service to Treviso Sant’Angelo

Pisa X CTR + ATZ Pisa APP/TWR service

Romagna X CTR Romagna + ATZ Rimini APP service to Forlì + APP/TWR service to Rimini

Sigonella X CTR Catania APP service to Catania and Comiso

Trapani X CTR + ATZ Trapani APP/TWR service

Verona Villafranca6

X ATZ Villafranca TWR service

Grosseto X CTR Grosseto APP service to Grosseto and Siena Ampugnano

Amendola X CTR Amendola APP service to Foggia Gino Lisa

Aviano X CTR Aviano APP service to Udine Campoformido

5 Service ATS was provided until 27/05/2014, MET and COM services are still provided 6 Service ATS was provided until 29/05/2014, MET and COM services are still provided


1.2.3 Airports

1.2.3.1 General information

Major airports, whose land belongs to the Italian civilian administration, are operated by stock companies under concession by ENAC. Two types of concession exist:

“normal” which allows the Airport Operator to manage the land side and the air terminal, while the air side remains responsibility of ENAC; they are only awarded for minor airports.

“total” concession including the air side.

Signs and markings are under the responsibility of the air side operator. At some airports lighting is implemented and managed by the ANSP (ENAV); in others directly by the Airport Operator. In any case ENAC certification includes lighting on the runway and taxiways.

Assoaeroporti is the association of the Airport Operators. A different association (Assoclearance) is responsible to support the allocation of the available slots among operators of public scheduled services on the basis of EU Regulation 793/2004.

1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, APO, FCM05, ITY-ADQ and SAF11.

The following airports are covered in this LSSIP edition :

Milano Linate

Milano Malpensa

Roma Fiumicino

Venezia Tessera

1.2.4 Military Authorities

The Military Authorities involved in ATM in Italy are composed of the Italian Air Force. ITAF reports to the Ministry of Defence. The Italian Air Force has adapted its organisational structure in order to generate functional separation between the high level body Air Force Staff (SMA USAM – Ufficio Generale Spazio Aereo e Meteorologia) accountable for services’ internal supervision and the units responsible for the provision of Air Navigation Services (Major Commands).

In accordance with the European Community Regulation 550/2004, article 7, paragraph 5, the Italian Air Force is authorised to provide ATS, CNS and MET Services to General Air Traffic (GAT) without certification.

In accordance with a specific MoU ITAF – ENAC signed on 22.09.2014, ITAF ensures internal supervision and ANS provision to GAT in compliance with EC regulations. ITAF provides supervision results to ENAC accordingly.

ITAF web address is: www.aeronautica.difesa.it

The regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.

Military Authority organizational arrangements are included in Annex B.


1.2.4.1 Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule-making

Oversight

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

Y

Level of such legal provision. State Law ( TUOM DPR 90/2010 dated 15/03/2010 and COM Dec Lgs 66 dated 15/03/2010)

Level of such legal provision: State Law ( TUOM DPR 90/2010 dated 15/03/2010 and COM Dec Lgs 66 dated 15/03/2010)

Authority signing such legal provision: President of Italian Republic and the Parliament

Authority signing such legal provision: President of Italian Republic and the Parliament

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for civil and military GAT

Y

OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y

ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification Y

ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Y

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability Y

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: None Additional Information: None

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP Y

National Military AIP Y National Military AIP Y

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N

Other: Flight Information Publication (PIV) Y Other: Flight Information Publication (PIV) Y

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: ITAF ITAF ensures internal supervision on ANS provided to GAT in compliance with EC regulations and in accordance with a specific MoU (ITAF – ENAC as National Supervisory Authority). ITAF provides supervision results to ENAC accordingly

Additional information: None Additional information: None


1.2.4.2 Service Provision role

ITAF was the sole national ANSP until 1980. Afterwards a civil ANSP was established. Since then, ITAF has been providing ANS to GAT in designated airspaces and military airports open to civilian traffic.

The current legal framework of Service provision is in accordance with Italian state law “Decreto del Presidente della Repubblica art. 99 DPR 90/2010”, which establishes the competency of Chief of Air Staff, Italian Air Force (ITAF) provides ANS to civil traffic in GAT in the airspace /airports under military responsibility.

In accordance with the European Community Regulation CE 1108/2009, ITAF provides ANS to GAT within the respectively air space established by national law, ensuring a level of safety that is at least as effective as that required by the essential requirements as defined in the above mentioned SES Regulation.

Performance and capability levels related to ANS provision by ITAF to civil air traffic are strictly related to:

The fulfilment of the military priorities and function defined by MOD;

The financial resources allocated for the specific function on the yearly air force budget;

The strength of human resources authorized for the specific function”.

ITAF provide ANS within the Airspace assigned by National Law. Details are exploded in the following paragraph. ANS to OAT (operational air traffic) are provided by ITAF within Italian FIRs.

Air traffic services to OAT are provided by ITAF with the 4 SCCAM (Coordination and Control Service for the Air Force) co-located within ENAV’s ACCs and the other Military ATC Units for TWR and APP Services.

The SCCAM location inside the ENAV’s ACC ensures close cooperation between civil and military Air Traffic Controllers with the provision of services (GAT by ENAV, OAT by ITAF) regulated by local Letters of Agreement in accordance with Italian legislation. The co-location of civil and military controllers in the same operational room allows them to use the same fully integrated equipment.

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate:

N/A

Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

Y

Additional Information: N/A

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route Y En-Route N

Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y

Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y

AIS Y AIS N

MET Y MET Y

SAR Y SAR Y

TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y

Other: FIS & CNS Y Other: CNS Y

Additional Information: None Additional Information: None


1.2.4.3 User role

1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only N GAT only N Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service Y

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y

CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y

Others: None

Military in ITALY applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




Traffic and Capacity Chapter 2 -

2.1 Evolution of traffic in Italy

2.1.1 Performance summer 2014

Traffic in Italy increased by 2.7% during Summer 2014 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2013.

2.1.2 Planning Period 2015-2019

The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.7% and 3.9%, with a baseline growth of 2.4% for Italy during the planning cycle.

0

500.000

1.000.000

1.500.000

2.000.000

2.500.000

2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F

IFR

flig

hts

Italy - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast

A = ActualF = Forecast

2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F

H 2.4% 3.2% 4.7% 3.8% 3.9% 3.9% 4.1%

B 0.8% -2.3% -2.2% 2.1% 1.6% 2.9% 2.4% 2.4% 2.7% 2.9%

L 1.8% -0.4% 0.7% 0.8% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1%

ESRA08 B 3.1% -2.4% -1.1% 1.8% 2.4% 2.8% 2.3% 2.3% 2.8% 3.1%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2014)IFR flights yearly growth

Italy


2.2 BRINDISI ACC

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019

2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance

Traffic Evolution 2014 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer

Capacity gap Ref value Actual

-8.0% 82 0.05 0.01 No

Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, the same as during Summer 2013.

Note: The area of responsibility of Brindisi ACC changed in April 2014.

Capacity: 71 Achieved Comments

Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation

Yes

Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes

Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and BLUEMED FAB implementation Yes

Free-route implementation program Yes

Mode S implementation Yes

Airspace and configuration re-organization Yes

Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes

Summer 2014 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 82. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 69 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 62.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 1434 1459 1349 1377 1273

Summer Traffic 1035 1054 978 961 884

Yearly Traffic 863 872 808 786 744

Summer Traffic Forecast 901 918 945 967 1001

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 912 951 987 1024 1071

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 885 893 902 911 930

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Enr

oute

Del

ay (

min

utes

per

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LIBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014


2.2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

Capacity Plan

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Free Route Airspace Free-route implementation program Airspace Management

Advanced FUA Improved airspace management

Airport & TMA Network Integration

PBN Program

Cooperative Traffic Management

Improved ATFCM, including STAM

Airspace Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to

network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and BLUEMED FAB implementation

Procedures Staffing Recruitment of ATCOs if necessary

Technical

Additional capacity benefits from VDL Mode 2 implementation by all stakeholders

ADSB

LINK IT

(Data Link implementation)

MTCD

Capacity Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation

Significant Events

Max sectors 5 5 6 6 6

Capacity increase p.a. 5% 3% 5% 3% 3%

Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 2% 2%

Additional information

2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.020.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02

AnnualSummer

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesLIBBCTA

H 82 0% 83 1% 85 2% 88 4% 92 5%

Ref. 82 0% 82 0% 82 0% 84 2% 86 2%

L 82 0% 82 0% 82 0% 82 0% 82 0%

Open 82 0% 82 0% 82 0% 83 1% 85 2%

C/R 82 0% 82 0% 82 0% 82 0% 84 2%

LIBB 82

Capacity Profiles

ACC2014

baseline Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019


2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook

As a result of the ACC reorganisation in 2014, no problems are foreseen for Brindisi during the planning cycle. Capacity enhancement measures planned are in the order of fine tuning the capacity already existing in the system and to support any possible improvement in Flight Efficiency.

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2015‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 82 82 82 84 86

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 82 82 82 83 85

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 82 82 82 82 84

Capacity Profile ‐ High 82 83 85 88 92

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 82 82 82 82 82

Capacity Baseline 82

2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 86 89 93 96 99

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Cap

acity profile (movemen

ts per hour)

LIBBCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


2.3 MILAN ACC





+39.2% 188 0.16 0.00 No


Note: the area of responsibility of Milano ACC changed in May 2014.

Capacity: 185 Achieved Comments


Yes


Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation Yes

Mode S implementation (Dec 2013) Yes



Implementation of CDO in LIML according to ENV01 Yes

PBN Program Yes



The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 188. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 183 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 171.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 2153 2198 2165 2020 2893

Summer Traffic 1888 1893 1853 1754 2441

Yearly Traffic 1701 1719 1659 1567 1907






0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enr

oute

Del

ay (

min

utes

per

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LIMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014




Capacity Plan

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Free Route Airspace Free-route implementation program Airspace Management

Advanced FUA Improved airspace management


PBN Program

Point merge in

LIMC Evaluation and implementation of AMAN//Extended

AMAN Cooperative Traffic Management Improved ATFCM, including STAM

Airspace

Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and BLUEMED

FAB implementation Airspace and configuration

re-organization

TMA

reorganisation

Procedures

Staffing Additional ATCOs

(from TWRs to ACC) Recruitment of ATCOs if necessary

Technical


ADSB

MTCD

LINK IT (Data Link

implementation)


Significant Events Expo 2015 (1 May – 31

Oct 15)

Max sectors 20 21 21 21 21

Capacity increase p.a. 5% 5% 2% 2% 2%

Reference profile 0% 1% 2% 3% 3%

Additional information Airspace and configuration re-organization: - New sectorisation and area of responsibility in November 2014

2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.090.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.11

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesLIMMCTA

AnnualSummer

H 189 1% 196 4% 204 4% 211 3% 221 5%

Ref. 188 0% 190 1% 194 2% 199 3% 205 3%

L 188 0% 188 0% 188 0% 188 0% 189 1%

Open 188 0% 191 2% 195 2% 200 3% 206 3%

C/R 188 0% 188 0% 190 1% 195 3% 201 3%

Capacity Profiles

ACC2014


2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

LIMM 188



As a result of the ACC reorganisation in 2014, no problems are foreseen for Milano during the planning cycle. Capacity enhancement measures planned are in the order of fine tuning the capacity already existing in the system and to support any possible improvement in Flight Efficiency.

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019






Capacity Baseline 188

2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 197 207 211 215 219

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

Cap


ts per hour)

LIMM_2015 - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


2.4 PADOVA ACC





+2.6% 193 (+3%) 0.16 0.01 No


Capacity Plan: 2% Achieved Comments


Yes

Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation

Yes


Implementation of CDO in LIPZ according to ENV01 Yes

Mode S implementation Yes


PBN Program Yes



The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 193, showing a 3% growth compared to Summer 2013. During the measured period (June and July) the average peak 1 hour demand was 182 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 169.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 2696 2755 2826 2869 2904

Summer Traffic 2156 2210 2220 2207 2264

Yearly Traffic 1792 1865 1844 1821 1861






0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enr

oute

Del

ay (

min

utes

per

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LIPPACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014




Capacity Plan

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Free Route Airspace Free-route implementation program

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

Improved airspace management


PBN Program

Cooperative Traffic Management Improved ATFCM, including STAM

Airspace



re-organization


Technical


ADSB

MTCD

LINK IT (Data Link

implementation)


Significant Events

Max sectors 13 13 14 14 14

Capacity increase p.a. Capacity: 183 3% 5% 2% 2%

Reference profile Capacity: 181 1% 1% 2% 2%

Additional information Airspace and configuration re-organization: - New sectorisation and area of responsibility in November 2014

2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.08 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.090.12 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.13

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesLIPPCTA

AnnualSummer

H 183 N/A 187 2% 191 2% 197 3% 206 5%

Ref. 181 N/A 183 1% 185 1% 188 2% 192 2%

L 179 N/A 180 1% 180 0% 180 0% 182 1%

Open 181 N/A 183 1% 185 1% 188 2% 193 3%

C/R 181 N/A 182 1% 184 1% 187 2% 192 3%

Capacity Profiles

ACC2014


2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

LIPP 193



As a result of the ACC reorganisation in November 2014, no problems are foreseen for Padova ACC during the planning cycle. Capacity enhancement measures planned are in the order of fine tuning the capacity already existing in the system and to support any possible improvement in Flight Efficiency.

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019






2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 183 188 197 201 205

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

Cap


ts per hour)

LIPP_2015 - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


2.5 ROME ACC





-18.9% 198 0.10 0.00 No


Note: the area of responsibility of Rome ACC changed in May 2014.

Capacity Plan: Capacity: 184 Achieved Comments


Yes

Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation

Yes


Implementation of CDO in LIRF according to ENV01 Yes



PBN Program Yes

Maximum configuration: 19/21 sectors Yes


The ACC capacity baseline was assessed measured at 198. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 188 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 173.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 3725 3744 3798 3799 3060

Summer Traffic 3109 3081 3068 3054 2477

Yearly Traffic 2684 2662 2583 2565 2293






0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Enr

oute

Del

ay (

min

utes

per

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LIRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014




Capacity Plan

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Free Route Airspace Free-route implementation program

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

Improved airspace management


PBN Program

Point Merge for LIRF and LIRA

Evaluation and implementation of AMAN/Extended AMAN

Cooperative Traffic Management

Improved ATFCM, including STAM

Airspace



re-organization

TMA reorganisation


Technical


ADSB

MTCD

LINK IT (Data Link

implementation)


Significant Events

Max sectors 20/21 21 21 21 21

Capacity increase p.a. Capacity: 213 5% 3% 3% 3%

Reference profile Capacity: 212 0% 0% 1% 1%

Additional information

Airspace and configuration re-organization: - Change of area of responsibility between Padova, Roma and Milano ACCs in November 2014

2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.050.06 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.06

AnnualSummer

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesLIRRCTA

H 213 N/A 215 1% 219 2% 225 3% 232 3%

Ref. 212 N/A 213 0% 214 0% 216 1% 219 1%

L 211 N/A 211 0% 211 0% 212 0% 212 0%

Open 212 N/A 214 1% 215 0% 217 1% 222 2%

C/R 212 N/A 214 1% 216 1% 221 2% 228 3%

Capacity Profiles

ACC2014


2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

LIRR 198



As a result of the ACC reorganisation in 2014, no problems are foreseen for Roma ACC during the planning cycle. Capacity enhancement measures planned are in the order of fine tuning the capacity already existing in the system and to support any possible improvement in Flight Efficiency.

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019






2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 213 224 231 238 245

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250Cap


ts per hour)

LIRR_2015 - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 3 -

Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2013 applicable to Italy (IT) for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Reference number

Recommendation Ownership

REC-2013-1 (4) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOP04.1 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

IT (LIMC), IT (LIML), IT (LIPZ), IT (LIRF)

State feedback: AOP04.1 is currently under the remit of a dedicated working group.

REC-2013-1 (6) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of INF04 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

LU, BG, HR, BA, GR, DE, ES, PL, GE, RO, RS, FI, ME, HU,

IT

State feedback: INF04 implementation has been delayed due to a review of the related project causing the review of the requirements.

REC-2013-1 (7) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of NAV03 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

ES, DE, BE, CY, BG, GE, LV, AZ, MD, ME, MK, MT, HR, IT,

RS, UK

State feedback: NAV03 delay is due to P-RNAV SID/STAR implementation and related ATCOs training that will be finalised by 2015.

REC-2013-1 (9) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ATC02.2 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

IT, AL, BA, NL, MT, PL, ES, CZ, GE, TR

State feedback: The implementation is foreseen in the frame of 4Flight programme.

REC-2013-1 (10) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ENV01 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

IT (LIPZ), IT (LIRF), IT (LIMC), IT (LIML)

State feedback: ENV01 will be completed with improved P-RNAV procedures tailored for the application of CDO with CDO level windows by 2015. Anyhow, currently, CDO are tactically implemented under radar vectoring.

REC-2013-1 (11) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY-AGDL to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

AT, IT, PT, SK, SI, SE, NO, RS, ES, ME, FR, MT

State feedback: ITY-AGDL implementation is actually in delay. By the way, the amendment to DLS regulation and the postponement of deadline will allow the implementation in due date.

REC-2013-1 (15) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY-COTR to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

AT, BE, DE, DK, BA, ES, IT, FR, GE, MT, HR, HU, IE, NO,

SK, UK, PT, SI

State feedback: ITY-COTR will be fully implemented in accordance to DLS dates because some SLoAs are linked this last service.

REC-2013-4 Ensure better planning reliability at local level. All States

State feedback: LSSIP planning in Italy is fully consistent with the national ATM Performance Plan.

REC-2013-5 The ANSPs should ensure synchronised system evolution between neighbouring States.

All ECAC ANSPs

State feedback: A solid FAB coordination is in place. Moreover, Italy has a number of projects with adjacent States

REC-2013-15

The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers.

FAB ANSPs

State feedback: A solid FAB coordination is in place. Moreover, Italy has a number of projects with adjacent States


National Projects Chapter 4 -

Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references

Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas *

ENAV (IT) eTOD (PI110041)

The project aims at implementing a tool to improve the data quality of Obstacle Charts surveys in the airports

2012-2018 - ESSIP:ITY-ADQOI-Steps: IS-0202, IS-0204 Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: The program, will improve consistency, reliability and integrity of aeronautical data impacting positively on Safety Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Automatic Flight Planning (PI110009-13)

The project aims at implementing the distribution of FPL messages in ADEXP format via AOIS to the National FDPs according to the entry into force of Amendment 1 to Doc. 4444

2012-2015 - ESSIP:FCM03, ITY-COTR OI-Steps: CM-0201, DCB-0302, IS-0101, IS-0102 Other: -

Capacity: The project will contribute to a more efficient planning and operational decision making. It will allow a better use of the network impacting positively on Capacity and Cost efficiency Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: The project will contribute to a more efficient planning and operational decision making. It will allow a better use of the network impacting positively on Capacity and Cost efficiency

AMHS (ATS Message Handling System) (PI070013)

The program provides upgrade of AFTN switching system and related terminals in airports to AMHS standard

2010-2015 - ESSIP:COM10OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: The project impacts positively on Safety thanks to a harmonized set of requirements. It will also reduce the of cost messaging services improving Cost efficiency Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: The project impacts positively on Safety thanks to a harmonized set of requirements. It will also reduce the of cost messaging services improving Cost efficiency




ENAV (IT) A-SMGCS Level 2 (PI140006)

The project will complement A-SMGCS Level 1 with functions able to detect potential conflicts on runways and intrusions, providing ATCOs proper warnings

2014-2019 - ESSIP:AOP04.2OI-Steps: AO-0102 Other: -

Capacity: The project will increase potential Capacity in low visibility conditions Safety: The project will improve, where necessary, the Safety of aerodromes operations Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Ground-ground and air-ground phone communication adaptation to VoIP (PI130018)

Substitution on ACC VCS with VoIP capable in intra centre communication and connection with radios

2014-2019 - ESSIP:COM11OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: The project impacts positively on Safety due to the enhancement of communication functions and on Cost efficiency (use of internet technologies). Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: The project impacts positively on Safety due to the enhancement of communication functions and on Cost efficiency (use of internet technologies).

Multilateration system (PI140054)

The Project aims at the implementation of Multilateration Systems for surveillance in airports already SMR provided. It foresees the installation of cooperative sensors (able to use transponder’s feedback) and its integration within provided local surveillance system

2014-2019 - ESSIP:AOP04.1, AOP04.2OI-Steps: AO-0102, AO-0201 Other: -

Capacity: The project will improve, where necessary, the Safety of aerodromes operations and increase potential Capacity in low visibility conditions Safety: The project will improve, where necessary, the Safety of aerodromes operations and increase potential Capacity in low visibility conditions Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

New SMR and new data fusion system at Milano Linate (PI120051)

The program provides replacement of 2 surface radars present in Linate airport plus new multi sensor fusion and presentation

2013-2017 - ESSIP:AOP04.1, AOP04.2OI-Steps: AO-0102, AO-0201 Other: -

Capacity: The project will improve, where necessary, the Safety of aerodromes operations and increase potential Capacity in low visibility conditions Safety: The project will improve, where necessary, the Safety of aerodromes operations and increase potential Capacity in low visibility conditions Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

New SMR at Milano Malpensa

The program provides replacement of surface radars present in Malpensa airport plus new multi sensor fusion and

2015-2019 - ESSIP:AOP04.1, AOP04.2OI-Steps: AO-0102, AO-

Capacity: The project will improve, where necessary, the Safety of aerodromes operations and increase




(PI120060) presentation 0201Other: -

potential Capacity in low visibility conditionsSafety: The project will improve, where necessary, the Safety of aerodromes operations and increase potential Capacity in low visibility conditions Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

NOAS (New Operational Area System) (PI100008)

Project aims at optimisation and deployment of systems developed for ENAV in the frame of AIRNAS 2010, AIRNAS 2010IS and ATENA SDD projects and the analysis of workflows


Capacity: -Safety: The project will improve consistency, reliability and integrity of data impacting positively on Safety Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

P-RNAV navigation support tools (PI110010)

The project foresees some changes to FDP and CWP software to provide the ATCOs with information and tools to handle with PRNAV equipped aircraft.

2011-2017 - ESSIP:NAV03OI-Steps: AOM-0601, AOM-0602 Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: The project improves Safety of flight operations by increased situational awareness and has a positive impact on Environment because of emissions and noise nuisance reduction in TMA Environment: The project improves Safety of flight operations by increased situational awareness and has a positive impact on Environment because of emissions and noise nuisance reduction in TMA Cost-Efficiency: -




ENAV (IT) Self-briefing (PI090021)

The Project enables the integration of several users with CED AOIS. They will be able to manage by theirselves several processes related to flight planning (Meteo/AIS and FPL management). The project enables the automatic provision of the service (pre-flight phase) making the information and Meteo/AIS documentation available to all users, using TCP/IP protocol, without any geographical constrain

2009-2018 - ESSIP:INF04OI-Steps: IS-0201 Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: The project will improve the standardization of flight preparation and will reduce duplications in data collection avoiding ambiguities and there impacting positively on Safety and Cost efficiency Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: The project will improve the standardization of flight preparation and will reduce duplications in data collection avoiding ambiguities and there impacting positively on Safety and Cost efficiency

TBT 8.33 KH completion below FL195 (PI090010)

Upgrade of VHF radios to 8,33 KHz channel separation in lower airspace

2014-2019 - ESSIP:ITY-AGVCS2OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: The projects can improve potential Capacity by satisfying the demand for new frequency assignments in the VHF band Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -


Regional Co-ordination Chapter 5 -

5.1 FAB Co-ordination

BLUE MED FAB is an established Functional Airspace Block (FAB) with an ongoing Implementation Phase undertaken through a solid Implementation Programme, involving four European Countries (Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Malta). The Implementation Programme is ongoing and is continuously updated upon direction of the BLUE MED Governing bodies. It is to be noted that Albania, Egypt, Tunisia, Lebanon and the Kingdom of Jordan took part with the status of Observer or Associated Partner in the BLUE MED FAB Definition Phase.

5.2 FAB Projects

Name / Code

Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references


ENAV (IT) ADQ (PI140050)

The program offers proper automated workflow and check in data dissemination, to ensure the quality of aeronautical data


Capacity: -Safety: The program, in accordance to the requirements of regulation EC 73/2010, will improve consistency, reliability and integrity of aeronautical data impacting positively on Safety. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

ADS-B Completion (PI130042)

The system provides the operational service of ADS-B stations, with integration in the ACC surveillance trackers, after the experimental phase

2014-2019 - ESSIP:ITY-ACID, ITY-SPIOI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: The project improves Safety through the deployment of surveillance solutions in non radar areas Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -


Name / Code



ENAV (IT) A-CDM (PI110020)

The project supports the operational efficiency of the airports and their better integration in ATM network, providing the software for information sharing and the connection of all concerned stakeholders.

2011-2016 - ESSIP:AOP05, FCM01OI-Steps: AO-0501, AO-0601, AO-0602, AO-0603, IS-0102 Other: -

Capacity: Reduced congestion and possible enhancement of Capacity Safety: - Environment: Reduced noise and emissions thanks to better timed operations with a positive impact on Environment Cost-Efficiency: -

Coflight (PI040010)

The program implements a new Flight Data processing systems, in common between ENAV and DSNA, with advanced trajectory prediction capabilities

2006-2016 - ESSIP:AOM21OI-Steps: AOM-0401, AOM-0402 Other: There is an agreement relating to the common procurement of the next generation of flight data processing systems in place. The breakdown of the party contribution is 60% (DSNA) and 40% (ENAV).

Capacity: -Safety: The program will contribute to cost reduction through the more efficient airspace allocation and utilization. It will have also a positive impact on Safety and on Environment thanks to the reduction of emissions when using more optimal routes/trajectories Environment: The program will contribute to cost reduction through the more efficient airspace allocation and utilization. It will have also a positive impact on Safety and on Environment thanks to the reduction of emissions when using more optimal routes/trajectories Cost-Efficiency: The program will contribute to cost reduction through the more efficient airspace allocation and utilization. It will have also a positive impact on Safety and on Environment thanks to the reduction of emissions when using more optimal routes/trajectories




ENAV (IT) Data Link 2000+ Implementation (phase 2) (PI060010)

Enav, in accordance with EC Regulation 29/2009, has started “Data-Link” programme with the objective to create a network for “ground to air” digital communication. This programme has the scope to improve the way electromagnetic band that represent a scarce resource is absorbed by mobile communication. Moreover, the programme is an opportunity to enhance the reliability of the “ground to air” communication that will take place by codified digital messages instead of by voice

2010-2017 - ESSIP:ITY-AGDL, ITY-COTROI-Steps: AUO-0301, CM-0201 Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: The program will have a Safety enhancement thanks to the delivery of standard messages. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Cost efficiency can improve due to sector productivity increase

Deconflicting Tools (PI120024)

Provide MTCD alarms to controllers operating in ACC to raise levels of safety and productivity of the ATC controllers. This implies an architectural review of the current HMI. Arrange a service of "What If" and a basic CORA

2012-2017 - ESSIP:ATC12OI-Steps: CM-0202, CM-0203 Other: There is a Preliminary agreement with DSNA relating to the design, development and procurement of the MTCD tool ERATO (En-route Air Traffic Organizer)

Capacity: It can potentially increase Capacity Safety: The project will have a positive impact on safety due to the reduced risk of the impact of controllers and pilots errors Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

ENET (PI050035)

The Project aims at providing the national ground network services able to connect to PENS

2006-2016 - ESSIP:COM09, ITY-FMTPOI-Steps: CM-0201-A Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: The project impacts positively on Cost efficiency


Name / Code



ENAV (IT) ENET Completion (PI130021)

The program completes the ENET network, including new services and VoIP transport

2014-2019 - ESSIP:COM09, ITY-FMTPOI-Steps: CM-0201-A Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: The project impacts positively on Cost efficiency

Mode S Radar Plan (PI080030)

The Project aims at integration and deployment of Mode S Radar functionalities. The project foresees the installation and integration of SW changes to SATCAS in the aim of MODE S project

2010-2015 - ESSIP:ITY-SPIOI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: -Safety: The project improves Safety through the deployment of surveillance solutions in non radar areas Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

4Flight (PI110008)

The programme has the aim to foster the evolution of ATM system to a European technological platform. This involves the development and the integration in a common standard architecture of a number of new components characterized by a high level of modularity, scalability and maintainability. In order to reduce risk exposure and to better exploit potential synergies, ENAV and the French ANSP (DSNA) have decided to establish a long term

2013-2019 - ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: The implementation of the programme will contribute to improve all the KPAs. Safety: The implementation of the programme will contribute to improve all the KPAs. Environment: The implementation of the programme will contribute to improve all the KPAs. Cost-Efficiency: The implementation of the programme will contribute to improve all the KPAs.


5.3 Regional cooperation

5.3.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives

Here below the list of bilateral agreements signed by ENAV:

- ENAV and SKYGUIDE

- ENAV and DFS

- ENAV and BULATSA

- ENAV and the Civil Aviation Affairs of Bahrain

- ENAV and UKSATSE

- ENAV and MATS

- ENAV and the General Directorate of State Airports Authority (DHMI) of Turkey

- ENAV and NATS

- ENAV and DSNA

- ENAV and NATA

- ENAV and NANSC

- ENAV and OACA

- ENAV and the Civil Aviation of Syria

- ENAV and the Swedish Airport and Navigation Service LFV

Furthermore ENAV, at the beginning of 2014, signed an important cooperation agreement with FAA and a Memorandum of Cooperation with BOEING.

Italy has in place Memorandum of Cooperation or Agreements with:

- Malta

- Switzerland


ENAV has in place Letters of Agreement (LOA) with the following ACCs of ANSPs of Adjacent States

- LoA Brindisi ACC - Atene ACC last update 03/04/2014

- LoA Brindisi ACC - Belgrado ACC last update 03/04/2014

- LoA Brindisi ACC - Tirana ACC last update 08/01/2015

- LoA Brindisi ACC - Zagabria ACC last update 13/11/2014

- LoA Milano ACC - Ginevra ACC last update 13/11/2014

- LoA Milano ACC - Marsiglia ACC last update 21/08/2014

- LoA Milano ACC - Zurigo ACC last update 13/11/2014

- LoA Padova ACC - Karlsruhe ACC last update 25/07/2013

- LoA Padova ACC - Ljubljana ACC last update 13/11/2014

- LoA Padova ACC - Monaco ACC last update 11/12/2014

- LoA Padova ACC - Wien ACC last update 11/12/2014

- LoA Padova ACC - Zagreb ACC last update 13/11/2014

- LoA Padova ACC - Zurigo ACC last update 13/11/2014

- LoA Roma ACC - Ginevra ACC last update 31/05/2012

- LoA Roma ACC - Atene ACC last update 13/11/2014

- LoA Roma ACC - Malta ACC last update 13/11/2014

- LoA Roma ACC - Marsiglia ACC last update 13/11/2014

- LoA Roma ACC - Tunisi ACC last update 13/11/2014

5.3.2 Regional Projects

Italian Regional Projects are comprised in a FAB perspective.


ESSIP Objective Implementation Chapter 6 -

Conventions

Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:

o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and

o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)

State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date

REG (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date

ASP (By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement

ASP. Progress (**)

ASP Impl. Date

MIL (By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement

MIL. Progress (**)

MIL Impl. Date

APO (By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

ECAC Completed No Plan

EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable

Multi-N Planned Missing Data

APT Late


AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

[IDP]

Partly Completed

OAT/GAT management system currently used in Italy is basically consistent with the EUROAT requirements. Additional procedures/coordination will be put in place in order to ensure national and adjacent States/FAB matching

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

OAT Regulatory Framework is an ITAF responsibility. National legislation in force (DPR 90/2010 dated 15/03/2010 and Civil Aviation Law ‐ Codice della Navigazione) already states the definition and the coexistence of GAT and OAT. In addition, by 2015, all regulation applicable to GAT will be under European Commission and EASA responsibility

Not Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2018)

From operational side common methods of traffic management are already ensured by close cooperation between civil and military ATCOs, using the same or compatible radar systems, tools, procedures etc. The actions under ANSP responsibility have been planned

Partly Completed

31/12/2015

MIL (By:12/2018) ITAF is planning the implementation by 12/2018

Partly Completed

31/12/2018

AOM19

Implement Advanced Airspace Management

Timescales:

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

[IDP]

Planned

ENAV target, according also to what requested by the EUROCONTROL Advanced FUA 2017 CONOPS document, is: ‐ to follow a performance driven "modus operandi" based on the management of Airspace Configurations established with a collaborative civil‐military airspace planning at the European Network level through an integrated ASM/ATFCM process and an extended planning phase into the day of operations; ‐ to develop procedures and supporting tools useful to implement more dynamic and flexible elements in line with what requested by SESAR. Italian Air Force and ENAV cooperate to implement an advanced airspace management by the planned timeframe.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

ENAV target, according also to what requested by the EUROCONTROL Advanced FUA 2017 CONOPS document, is: ‐ to follow a performance driven "modus operandi" based on the management of Airspace Configurations established with a collaborative civil‐military airspace planning at the European Network level through an integrated ASM/ATFCM process and an extended planning phase into the day of operations; ‐ to develop procedures and supporting tools useful to implement more dynamic and flexible elements in line with what requested by SESAR

Italian Air Force cooperates with Eurocontrol and National Civil Service Provider to implement an advanced Airspace Management in the foreseen timeframe according to SESAR objectives.

Planned

31/12/2016


AOM21

Implementation of Free Route Airspace

Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

Italy is developing a Free Route Airspace program. The program is developed in different steps. The first step was implemented at the end of 2013 (AIRAC 11‐13 ‐ e.d. 12DEC2013) based mainly on the creation of DCT segments across Italian ACC from FL365 during night/holiday/weekend, in addition period of availability of most of the existing NGT Routes has been extended to WE. After this step a number of NGT/WE DCTs have been transformed in NGT/WE segments of new/existing ATS routes in the occasion of other changes. The second step will be implemented at the beginning of 2015 (AIRAC 12‐14 ‐ e.d. 08JAN2015). The same existing DCTs and Routes (except a limited number due to operational purposes), together with new DCTs will be available at FL315 during the same time frame of step1. Third step consists of implementation of full Free Route Airspace above FL365; proposed period to implement this phase is the second half on 2016. ITAF fully cooperates with ENAV for the coordination of all implementation steps.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2017)

Italy is developing a Free Route Airspace program. The program is developed in different steps. The first step was implemented at the end of 2013 (AIRAC 11‐13 ‐ e.d. 12DEC2013) based mainly on the creation of DCT segments across Italian ACC from FL365 during night/holiday/weekend, in addition period of availability of most of the existing NGT Routes has been extended to WE. After this step a number of NGT/WE DCTs have been transformed in NGT/WE segments of new/existing ATS routes in the occasion of other changes. The second step will be implemented at the beginning of 2015 (AIRAC 12‐14 ‐ e.d. 08JAN2015). The same existing DCTs and Routes (except a limited number due to operational purposes), together with new DCTs will be available at FL315 during the same time frame of step1. Third step consists of implementation of full Free Route Airspace above FL365; proposed period to implement this phase is the second half on 2016. ITAF fully cooperates with ENAV for the coordination of all implementation steps.

Coflight

Planned

31/12/2016


AOP03

Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions

Timescales:


[IDP]

Completed

Local Runway Safety Teams are established in the majority of national airports (including Linate, Malpensa, Venezia and Fiumicino). EAPPRI recommendations are implemented and regularly monitored

‐

REG (By:12/2013)

ENAC issued a Regulation to adopt ICAO Annex 14 standards, which includes the certification of Airports. Furthermore, ENAC has published Circular APT 30

Completed

‐

ASP (By:12/2013)

EAPPRI recommendations are implemented and regularly monitored. According to ENAC Circular APT 30, LRST establishment is not an ANSP responsibility.

For the military, ITAF takes part in the Local Runway Safety Teams established in those airports operated by civil aviation. EAPPRI best practices have been yearly disseminated to military service providers. In addition the relevant recommendations of the plan have been translated with the aim to be published in a dedicated publication for the military units involved.

Completed

‐

APO (By:12/2013)

Local Runway Safety Teams are established in the majority of national airports. The EAPPRI recommendations are implemented and regularly monitored in accordance to ENAC Circular APT 30.

For the military, ITAF takes part in the Local Runway Safety Teams established in those airports operated by civil aviation. EAPPRI best practices have been yearly disseminated to military service providers. In addition the relevant recommendations of the plan have been translated with the aim to be published in a dedicated publication for the military units involved.

Completed

‐

AOP04.1

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1

Timescales:


Late

LIMC - Milan - Malpensa

ENAV has installed the required surveillance equipment and, as well as SEA, will implement the A‐SMGCS operational procedures as far as issued by the National Regulator. ENAC introduced the preparation of an A‐SMGCS advisory circular in the Rulemaking Program

30/09/2015

REG (By:12/2010) ENAC has activated a dedicated working group

Late

30/09/2015

ASP (By:12/2011)

ENAV has installed the required surveillance equipment and will implement the A‐SMGCS operational procedures as far as issued by the National Regulator

Multilateration system / New SMR and new data fusion system at Milano Linate / New SMR at Milano Malpensa

Late

30/09/2015

APO (By:12/2010)

SEA has planned to install Mode S transponder on ground vehicles and will implement the A‐SMGCS operational procedures as far as issued by the National Regulator

Late

30/09/2015


AOP04.1


Timescales:


Late

LIML - Milan - Linate

ENAV has installed the required surveillance equipment and, as well as SEA, will implement the A‐SMGCS operational procedures as far as issued by the National Regulator. ENAC introduced the preparation of an A‐SMGCS advisory circular in the Rulemaking Program

30/09/2015


Late

30/09/2015

ASP (By:12/2011)

ENAV has installed the required surveillance equipment and will implement the A‐SMGCS operational procedures as far as issued by the National Regulator


Late

30/09/2015

APO (By:12/2010)

SEA has planned to install Mode S transponder on ground vehicles and will implement the A‐SMGCS operational procedures as far as issued by the National Regulator

Late

30/09/2015

AOP04.1


Timescales:


Late

LIPZ - Venezia

ENAV has planned to install the required surveillance. SAVE has planned the implementation of the required surveillance. ENAC has activated a dedicated working group

30/09/2015


Late

30/09/2015

ASP (By:12/2011) ENAV has planned to install the required surveillance


Late

30/09/2015

APO (By:12/2010)

SAVE has planned the implementation of the required surveillance by 2015 as a consequence of major works on the runway which will enable, through a technological improvement, to access the multilateration system

Late

30/06/2015


AOP04.1


Timescales:


Late

LIRF - Roma - Fiumicino

ENAV has installed the required surveillance equipment and, as well as AdR, will implement the A‐SMGCS operational procedures as far as issued by the National Regulator. ENAC introduced the preparation of an A‐SMGCS advisory circular in the Rulemaking Program

30/09/2015


Late

30/09/2015

ASP (By:12/2011)

ENAV has installed the required surveillance equipment and, as well as AdR, will implement the A‐SMGCS operational procedures as far as issued by the National Regulator


Late

30/09/2015

APO (By:12/2010)

AdR is installing Mode S transponder on ground vehicles and will implement the A‐SMGCS operational procedures as far as issued by the National Regulator

Late

28/05/2015

AOP04.2

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2

Timescales:


Planned


ENAV has plans to implement A‐SMGCS Level 2 31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2017) ENAV has plans to implement A‐SMGCS Level 2

A‐SMGCS Level 2 / Multilateration system / New SMR and new data fusion system at Milano Linate / New SMR at Milano Malpensa

Planned

31/12/2017

APO (By:12/2017)

SEA has implemented the Runway Incursion Prevention Control Alerting System and is waiting for related technical specification

Planned

31/12/2017


AOP04.2


Timescales:


Planned


ENAV has plans to implement A‐SMGCS Level 2 31/12/2017



Planned

31/12/2017

APO (By:12/2017)

SEA has implemented of the Runway Incursion Prevention Control Alerting System and is waiting for related technical specification

Planned

31/12/2017

AOP04.2


Timescales:


Planned

LIPZ - Venezia

ENAV has plans to implement A‐SMGCS Level 2. SAVE has put in place the SMGCS monitoring system requested by Annex 14 Icao, Chapter 8 Aerodrome Design Manual part 5, Chapter 3 implementation will follow ENAC specifications on SMGCS

31/12/2017



Planned

31/12/2017

APO (By:12/2017)

SAVE has put in place the SMGCS monitoring system requested by Annex 14 Icao, Chapter 8 Aerodrome Design Manual part 5, Chapter 3 implementation will follow ENAC specifications on SMGCS

Planned

31/12/2017


AOP04.2


Timescales:


Planned


ENAV has plans to implement A‐SMGCS Level 2. Aeroporti di Roma will install the A‐SMGCS control function equipment relevant to the Airport Operator responsibilities

31/12/2017



Planned

31/12/2017

APO (By:12/2017)

Aeroporti di Roma will install the A‐SMGCS control function equipment relevant to the Airport Operator responsibilities

Planned

31/12/2017

AOP05

Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

Timescales:


[IDP]

Partly Completed


Airport management system services are implemented, provided by ANSP and AO in a coordinated way within one's remit. The full CDM implementation will be finalised by 10/2015

31/10/2015

ASP (By:01/2016)

Airport management system services are implemented, provided by ANSP and AO in a coordinated way within one's remit.

A‐CDM

Partly Completed

31/10/2015

APO (By:01/2016)

Today airport management system services are implemented, provided by ANSP and AO in a coordinated way within one's remit

Partly Completed

31/10/2015

AOP05


Timescales:


[IDP]

Partly Completed



31/01/2016

ASP (By:01/2016)


A‐CDM

Partly Completed

31/01/2016

APO (By:01/2016)


Partly Completed

31/10/2015


AOP05


Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

LIPZ - Venezia

Airport management system services are implemented, provided by ANSP and AO in a coordinated way within one's remit. The full CDM implementation will be finalised by October 2015

31/10/2015

ASP (By:01/2016)


A‐CDM

Partly Completed

31/10/2015

APO (By:01/2016)

Airport management system services are implemented, provided by ANSP and AO in a coordinated way within one's remit

Planned

31/10/2015

AOP05


Timescales:


[IDP]

Partly Completed



01/03/2015

ASP (By:01/2016)


A‐CDM

Partly Completed

01/03/2015

APO (By:01/2016)

Today airport management system services are implemented, provided by ANSP and AO in a coordinated way within one's remit. Aeroporti di Roma has completed all the activities necessary for A‐CDM in adverse condition implementation

Completed

‐

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Late

Review of current STCA implementation and identification of possible remedial actions in order to align the STCA Level I functions and performances with the EUROCONTROL specification for STCA Level 2 is ongoing and the implementation is planned. Once ENAV plans will be defined, ENAC will perform the oversight in the framework of the current SES Regulations (Common Requirements and Interoperability Regulation).

31/12/2016

ASP (By:01/2013)

Review of current STCA implementation and identification of possible remedial actions in order to align the STCA Level I functions and performances with the EUROCONTROL specification for STCA Level 2 is ongoing and the implementation is planned.

For the military, ITAF has planned to implement STCA functions.

Late

31/12/2016


ATC02.5

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Planned

The implementation of APW Level 2 is foreseen.The training will be carried out according to APW function implementation. For the military, ITAF has planned to implement APW functions.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

The implementation of APW Level 2 is foreseen. The training will be carried out according to ASP01 implementation For the military, ITAF has planned to implement APW functions.

Planned

31/12/2016

ATC02.6

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Planned

The implementation of MSAW is foreseen. For the military, ITAF has planned to implement MSAW functions.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

The implementation is foreseen in the frame. For the military, ITAF has planned to implement MSAW functions.

Planned

31/12/2016

ATC02.7

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Planned

The implementation of APM Level 2 is foreseen. For the military, ITAF has planned to implement APM functions.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

The implementation of APM Level 2 is foreseen. For the military, ITAF has planned to implement APM functions.

Planned

31/12/2016

ATC07.1

Implement arrival management tools

Timescales:


Not Applicable

ENAV is aiming to implement in due time upgraded functionalities of Extended AMAN in En‐Route operations according to ATC15. Therefore there is no intention to implement Basic AMAN.

‐

ASP (By:12/2015)

ENAV is aiming to implement in due time upgraded functionalities of Extended AMAN in En‐Route operations according to ATC15. Therefore there is no intention to implement Basic AMAN.

Not Applicable

‐


ATC12

Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring

Timescales:


Planned

Preliminary feasibility study on MTCD integration on SATCAS architecture has been successfully performed in BRINDISI ACC PSA. Implementation of MTCD has been already planned in the SATCAS architecture. The first ACC to implent MTCD software will be Brindisi ACC

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

Preliminary feasibility study on MTCD integration on SATCAS architecture has been successfully performed in BRINDISI ACC PSA. Implementation of MTCD has been already planned in the SATCAS architecture. The first ACC to implent MTCD software will be Brindisi ACC

Deconflicting Tools

Planned

31/12/2016

ATC15

Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations

Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

ENAV has plans to adapt the ATC systems implementing Arrival Management functionality in En‐Route sectors to support AMAN operations in adjacent/subjacent TMAs. ENAC will conduct the safety oversight of the changes in due time

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2017)

ENAV has plans to adapt the ATC systems implementing Arrival Management functionality in En‐Route sectors to support AMAN operations in adjacent/subjacent TMAs.

Planned

31/12/2017

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1

Timescales:


Completed

ENAC has completed all required actions. Dedicated training modules related to TCAS II changes 7.1 have been put in place by ENAV during the planned continuous training in the ATSUs. There are no plans for performance monitoring as the ANSP is not in the best position to monitor the ACAS performances. ACAS is an airborne‐based system, consequently the better perspective should be left to the aircraft operators. Anyhow, ENAV has in place a reporting mechanism able to identify all the TCAS RA, that, if judged significant, are analysed

‐

REG (By:12/2015) ENAC has completed all required actions.

Completed

‐

ASP (By:03/2012)

Dedicated training modules related to TCAS II changes 7.1 have been put in place during the planned continuous training in the ATSUs. There are no plans for performance monitoring as the ANSP is not in the best position to monitor the ACAS performances. ACAS is an airborne‐based system, consequently the better perspective should be left to the aircraft operators. Anyhow, ENAV has in place a reporting mechanism able to identify all the TCAS RA, that, if judged significant, are analysed.

Completed

‐

MIL (By:12/2015) ITAF has implemented all relevant actions.

Completed

‐


ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

ENAV will upgrade and put into service the ATC system to support electronic dialogue procedures in transfer of communication process as well as coordination process by 12/2018.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

ENAV will upgrade and put into service the ATC system to support electronic dialogue procedures in transfer of communication process as well as coordination process by 12/2018

Planned

31/12/2018

COM09

Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)

Timescales:


[IDP]

Late

Migration from X.25 to IP data networking is related to FMTP programme and PENS. ENAV subscribed to PENS services and uses E‐NET, the national IP network, for the connection to PENS. The complete migration of FMTP from IPv4 to IPv6 will be finalised according to FMTP IR amendment.

30/06/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

Migration from X.25 to IP data networking is related to FMTP programme and PENS. ENAV subscribed to PENS services and uses E‐NET, the national IP network, for the connection to PENS. The complete migration of FMTP from IPv4 to IPv6 will be finalised according to FMTP IR amendment.

ENET / ENET Completion

Late

30/06/2015

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS

Timescales:


Late

Migration to AMHS is planned to be completed by 12/2015 31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2014) Migration to AMHS is planned to be completed by 12/2015.

AMHS (ATS Message Handling System)

Late

31/12/2015

COM11

Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

Timescales:


Planned

ENAV objective is to migrate its ATM voice services to VoIP by 12/2018 for inter‐center telephony and 12/2020 for links to the ground radio stations. For the military, the migration is planned.

31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

ENAV is following actively the development of VoIP and intends to use it in future Voice Communication Systems, in line with initial operational capability in 2013. ENAVs objective is to migrate its ATM voice services to VoIP by 12/2018 for inter‐center telephony and 12/2020 for links to the ground radio stations.

For the military, the migration is planned.

Ground‐ground and air‐ground phone communication adaptation to VoIP

Planned

31/12/2020


ENV01

Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

Timescales:


[IDP]

Late


In 2012 AIC A6 has been published in AIP Italia providing airspace users with information about implementation of CDO by ENAV S.p.A. in terminal airspaces under its jurisdiction. Currently CDO are tactically implemented under radar vectoring. According to what reported in IDP, ENAV is already developing dedicated CDO procedures that will be gradually phased in.

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2013)

In 2012 AIC A6 has been published in AIP Italia providing airspace users with information about implementation of CDO by ENAV S.p.A. in terminal airspaces under its jurisdiction. Currently CDO are tactically implemented under radar vectoring. According to what reported in IDP, ENAV is already developing dedicated CDO procedures that will be gradually phased in. In a first implementation stage they will be performed during night time only.

Late

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2013) SEA supports CDOps in full cooperation with ENAV

Late

30/06/2015

ENV01


Timescales:

‐ not applicable ‐

[IDP]

Late


(Outside Applicability Area)

In 2012 AIC A6 has been published in AIP Italia providing airspace users with information about implementation of CDO by ENAV S.p.A. in terminal airspaces under its jurisdiction. Currently CDO are tactically implemented under radar vectoring. According to what reported in IDP, ENAV is already developing dedicated CDO procedures that will be gradually phased in.

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2013)


Late

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2013) SEA supports CDOps in full cooperation with ENAV

Late

30/06/2015


ENV01


Timescales:


[IDP]

Late

LIPZ - Venezia


31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2013)

In 2012 AIC A6 has been published in AIP Italia providing airspace users with information about implementation of CDO by ENAV S.p.A. in terminal airspaces under its jurisdiction. Currently CDO are tactically implemented under radar vectoring. According to what reported in IDP, ENAV is already developing dedicated CDO procedures that will be gradually phased in. In a first implementation stage they will be performed during night time only

Late

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2013) SAVE supports CDOps in full cooperation with ENAV

Late

30/06/2045

ENV01


Timescales:


[IDP]

Late



31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2013)


Late

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2013) AdR supports CDOps in full cooperation with ENAV

Late

31/12/2015


ENV02

Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports

Timescales:


Partly Completed


With reference to noise emission Italian legislation envisages airport commissions, chaired by ENAC, to which ENAV participates with an advisory role. SEA is planning to activate formal partnership arrangements

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2016)

With reference to noise emission Italian legislation envisages airport commissions, chaired by ENAC, to which ENAV participates with an advisory role.

Partly Completed

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2016) SEA is planning to activate formal partnership arrangements with ENAV

Partly Completed

31/12/2015

ENV02


Timescales:


Partly Completed


With reference to noise emission Italian legislation envisages airport commissions, chaired by ENAC, to which ENAV participates with an advisory role. SEA is planning to activate formal partnership arrangements

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2016)


Partly Completed

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2016) SEA is planning to activate formal partnership arrangements with ENAV

Partly Completed

31/12/2015

ENV02


Timescales:


Partly Completed

LIPZ - Venezia

With reference to noise emission Italian legislation envisages airport commissions, chaired by ENAC, to which ENAV and the airport operator participate with an advisory role.

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2016)


Partly Completed

31/12/2015

APO (By:12/2016)

SAVE has an agreement with ENAV to improve performance since June 2008 and is planning to activate formal partnership arrangements with ENAV

Partly Completed

31/12/2015


ENV02


Timescales:


Partly Completed


With reference to noise emission Italian legislation envisages airport commissions, chaired by ENAC, to which ENAV participates with an advisory role. AdR has an agreement with ENAV to improve performance since June 2008.

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2016)


Completed

‐

APO (By:12/2016) AdR has activated formal partnership arrangements with ENAV

Partly Completed

31/12/2015

FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services

Timescales:


Completed

Italian ACCs supply ETFMS with Standard Correlated Position Data. Slot information related to the flights is presented to the TWR controllers of the major aerodromes (via AOIS)

‐

ASP (By:07/2014)

Italian ACCs supply ETFMS with Standard Correlated Position Data. Slot information correlated to the flights is presented to the TWR controllers of the major aerodromes (via AOIS).

This objective is not applicable to ITAF because all the ATFM data are processed via ENAV AOIS (Aeronautical Operational Information System).

A‐CDM

Completed

‐

FCM03

Implement collaborative flight planning

Timescales:


[IDP]

Partly Completed

The national FPPS called AOIS/FDMAS will be able to exchange FPL messages in ADEXP format when the upgrading of AFTN will be completed. Implementation of AFP messages using ADEXP is under evaluation. Implementation of AFP in ADEXP format automatically generated by the ATC system based on an ATC input subject to the FDP upgrade. The use of IFPLID in all messages to TACT and the use of IFPLID in exchange of route‐charge data is subject to the implementation of flight plan message processing in ADEXP format. The full accomplishment of the objective is aligned with the requirements for the ICAO FPL 2012 implementation (Amendment 1 to Doc. 4444).

30/06/2015

ASP (By:12/2015)

The national FPPS called AOIS/FDMAS will be able to exchange FPL messages in ADEXP format when the upgrading of AFTN will be completed. As from October 2008 the italian ACCs started sending AFP messages in ADEXP format for all the cases via ACC AOIS terminal. Implementation of AFP in ADEXP format automatically generated by the ATC system based on an ATC input subject to the FDP upgrade. The use of IFPLID in all messages to ETFMS is subject to the implementation of flight plan message processing in ADEXP format. The full accomplishment of the objective is aligned with the requirements for the ICAO FPL 2012 implementation (Amendment 1 to Doc. 4444).

For the military, the service will be ensured by AOIS system provided by ENAV following an ad hoc agreement.

Automatic Flight Planning

Partly Completed

30/06/2015


FCM04

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1

Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

ENAV will implement Short Term ATFCM Measures and will participate to the SESAR STAM trials 31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2015)

ENAV will implement Short Term ATFCM Measures and will participate to the SESAR STAM trials

Planned

31/12/2015

FCM05

Implementation of interactive rolling NOP

Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

ENAV is planning to upgrade ASM support system using AIXM5.1 B2B in 2016. Italian airports are providing the required data to the Network Manager for DDR.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

ENAV is planning to upgrade ASM support system using AIXM5.1 B2B in 2016.

Planned

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2016)

Italian airports are providing the required data to the Network Manager for DDR

Completed

‐

INF04

Implement integrated briefing

Timescales:


Late

ENAV will provide FPL management (with associated ATS messages), AIS, MET, and ATFM data integrated in a single briefing source which provides the relevant information required for the pre‐flight information and documentation via a single system interface, using internet connection through security gate server and https internet protocol.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2012)

ENAV will provide FPL management (with associated ATS messages), AIS, MET, and ATFM data integrated in a single briefing source which provides the relevant information required for the pre‐flight information and documentation via a single system interface, using internet connection through security gate server and https internet protocol.

For the military, ITAF is planning to develop a new integrated automatical system to provide all essential information needed by pilots during pre‐flight phase via a single system interface.

Self‐briefing

Late

31/12/2016


INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD)

Timescales:


Planned

Pending the availability of a national TOD policy and a national TOD implementation programme, ENAV (AIS provider) has nevertheless planned and implemented the required activities for the collection, management and provision of Terrain and Obstacle Data as follows: As far as Area 1 is concerned, Obstacles made known to AIS are available in ENAV Data Base; As far as Area 2 is concerned, Terrain and Obstacles data related to Aerodromes under ENAV jurisdiction are available in ENAV Data Base as per ICAO Annex 15; As far as Area 4 is concerned, Terrain and Obstacles data related to Aerodromes with ILS Cat III and II under ENAV jurisdiction are available in ENAV Data Base.

31/05/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

A National TOD policy, including a regulatory framework and TOD oversight capabilities as well as oversight and verification will be established.

Planned

31/05/2018

ASP (By:05/2018)

Pending the availability of a national TOD policy and a national TOD implementation programme, ENAV (AIS provider) has nevertheless planned and implemented the required activities for the collection, management and provision of Terrain and Obstacle Data as follows: As far as Area 1 is concerned, Obstacles made known to AIS are available in ENAV Data Base; As far as Area 2 is concerned, Terrain and Obstacles data related to Aerodromes under ENAV jurisdiction are available in ENAV Data Base as per ICAO Annex 15; As far as Area 4 is concerned, Terrain and Obstacles data related to Aerodromes with ILS Cat III and II under ENAV jurisdiction are available in ENAV Data Base.

Planned

31/05/2018

APO (By:05/2018)

A plan/roadmap by the airport operator demonstrating the feasibility of implementation of TOD will be made available. The requirements defined in the national TOD policy and regulatory framework for airport operators are planned to be fulfilled once available.

Planned

31/05/2018

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft identification

Timescales:

Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025

Partly Completed

Downlinked aircraft identification is ensured. Italian Air Force upgrades systems for the SCC in Milano, Padova and Roma and is planning to procure new surveillance systems for the SCC in Brindisi

31/12/2015

ASP (By:01/2020)

Downlinked aircraft identification is ensured by ENAV. Italian Air Force upgrades systems for the SCC in Milano, Padova and Roma and is planning to procure new surveillance systems for the SCC in Brindisi

ADS‐B Completion

Partly Completed

31/12/2015


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

Timescales:

Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

Planned

ENAV is finalizing all data quality and process requirements. AIS data included in SDO minimum data set are regularly subject to EAD consistency review mechanisms. Following the acceptance of the legacy systems by the NSA, according to the provision of Reg. EC 1070/2009 , all subsequent new implementation and/or changes needed to comply fully with Reg. EC 73/2010 are following the change management procedures approved by the NSA itself. Processes are well established between ENAV and the NSA in Safety Assessment, Change Management and related Declarations of Verification of Systems. Furthermore, ENAV has implemented a quality management system and has fulfilled safety and security objectives. Personnel requirements have been met. The common data set and digital exchange format requirements will be implemented by 12/2016, all electronic data will be compliant with all the requirements by 07/2017.

30/06/2017

REG (By:06/2017) ENAC has planned the activity

Planned

30/06/2017

ASP (By:06/2017)

ENAV is finalizing all data quality and process requirements. AIS data included in SDO minimum data set are regularly subject to EAD consistency review mechanisms. Following the acceptance of the legacy systems by the NSA, according to the provision of Reg. EC 1070/2009 , all subsequent new implementation and/or changes needed to comply fully with Reg. EC 73/2010 are following the change management procedures approved by the NSA itself. Processes are well established between ENAV and the NSA in Safety Assessment, Change Management and related Declarations of Verification of Systems. Furthermore, ENAV has implemented a quality management system and has fulfilled safety and security objectives. Personnel requirements have been met. The common data set and digital exchange format requirements will be implemented by 12/2016, all electronic data will be compliant with all the requirements by 07/2017.

ADQ / NOAS (New Operational Area System) / eTOD

Planned

30/06/2017

APO (By:06/2017)

Italian Airports are certified ad audited by ENAC according to the "Regolamento per la Costruzione e l'esercizio degli Aeroporti" and specific Circulars

Planned

30/06/2017


ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285

Timescales:

Entry into force of regulation: 06/02/2009 New aircraft capability: 31/12/2010 ATS unit operational capability ‐ Regulation (EC) 29/2009, Annex I, Part A: 06/02/2013 Retrofit aircraft capability: 04/02/2015

[IDP]

Late

The implementation of ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285 is in progress 31/10/2016

REG (By:02/2016)

The implementation of ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285 is in progress according to ENAV's plans

Late

31/10/2016

ASP (By:02/2016)

The implementation of ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285 is in progress

Data Link 2000+ Implementation (phase 2)

Late

31/10/2016

MIL (By:01/2014)

The equipment of transport‐type State aircraft is in progress according to EC 29/2009

Late

28/02/2015

ITY‐AGVCS2

Implement air‐ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195

Timescales:

Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

Planned

There are no frequencies to be converted to 8.33 KHz due to airspace classification constraints and utilisation of offset techniques. Therefore no VCS upgrade have been planned for the first phase. Voice communication systems upgrade is foreseen within ENAV business plan for 2018 phase

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018) All the necessary actions have been planned

Planned

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

Following the Italian airspace restructuring in 2014, there are no frequencies to be converted to 8.33 KHz due to airspace classification constraints and utilisation of offset techniques. Therefore no VCS upgrade has been planned for the first phase. Voice communication systems upgrade is foreseen within ENAV business plan for 2018 phase

TBT 8.33 KH completion below FL195

Planned

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2020) ITAF has planned the implementation according to the requirements

Planned

31/12/2018

APO (By:12/2018) Italian airports have planned the implementation

Planned

31/12/2018


ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes

Timescales:

Entry into force of regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012 : 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL 285 in the airspace in Annex I, Part A of Regulation (EC) 29/2009: 06/02/2013

Late

The national FPPS called AOIS/FDMAS will be able to exchange FPL messages in ADEXP format when the upgrading of AFTN will be completed. As from October 2008 the italian ACCs started sending AFP messages in ADEXP format for all the cases via ACC AOIS terminal. The implementation of AFP in ADEXP format automatically generated by ATC system based on an ATC input subject to the FDP upgrade will be finalised by 12/2016.

31/10/2016

ASP (By:02/2016)

The national FPPS called AOIS/FDMAS will be able to exchange FPL messages in ADEXP format when the upgrading of AFTN will be completed. As from October 2008 the Italian ACCs started sending AFP messages in ADEXP format for all the cases via ACC AOIS terminal. The implementation of AFP in ADEXP format automatically generated by ATC system based on an ATC input subject to the FDP upgrade will be finalised by 12/2016

Automatic Flight Planning / Data Link 2000+ Implementation (phase 2)

Late

31/10/2016

MIL (By:12/2012)

ITAF (SCC/AM) and ENAV use a common system for exchange Basic Flight Data

Completed

‐

ITY‐FMTP

Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)

Timescales:

Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

[IDP]

Late

ENAV has planned to migrate Flight Data Exchange to TCP/IP support version 6 according to the Interoperability Regulation EC 633/2007 in due course. Technical specification will be based on Eurocontrol FDE‐ICD. A Security policy will be defined. Technical development and implementation of TCP/IP for Italian ACCs will cover the need of civil‐military coordination at ACC level, being the military units/systems co‐located and integrated in Italian ACCs.

30/06/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

ENAV has planned to migrate Flight Data Exchange to TCP/IP support version 6 according to the Interoperability Regulation EC 633/2007 in due course. Technical specification will be based on Eurocontrol FDE‐ICD. A Security policy will be defined. Technical development and implementation of TCP/IP for Italian ACCs will cover the need of civil‐military coordination at ACC level, being the military units/systems co‐located and integrated in Italian ACCs.

ENET / ENET Completion

Late

30/06/2015

MIL (By:12/2014)

This objective is applicable for ITAF only referring to the SCC/AM. The technical development and implementation of TCP/IP for military units/systems co‐located and integrated in Italian ACCs is under evaluation.

Not Applicable

‐


ITY‐SPI

Surveillance performance and interoperability

Timescales:

Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

Planned

ENAV has transferred all surveillance data to other ANSPs (SkyGuide, DSNA, Slovenia Control, MATS and ITAF) through Asterix protocol. ANSP communicated to ENAC a Compliance Check List related to the deadline of 31st Dec 2013. The following articles are affected: 4, 5 (para 1 and 2), 7. State Aircraft will be equipped according to CE 1207/2011.

07/06/2020

REG (By:02/2015)

ANSP communicated to ENAC a Compliance Check List related to the deadline of 31st Dec 2013. The following articles are affected: 4, 5 (para 1 and 2), 7.

Completed

‐

ASP (By:02/2015)

ENAV has transferred all surveillance data to other ANSPs (SkyGuide, DSNA, Slovenia Control, MATS and ITAF) through Asterix protocol.

ADS‐B Completion / Mode S Radar Plan

Completed

‐

MIL (By:06/2020) State Aircraft will be equipped according to CE 1207/2011

Planned

07/06/2020

NAV03

Implementation of P‐RNAV

Timescales:


Late

ENAV has published the AIC A1/2011 about ‐Introduction of Precision RNAV (P‐RNAV) in the Terminal Airspace of Italy‐ on 21 Apr 2011 and has officially introduced P‐RNAV procedures in June 2011 in Milan and Rome TMAs. ATCOs specific training has been already. P‐RNAV SIDs and STARs have been implemented at selected Control Zones and training has been provided to Approach Control ATCOs. Some specific items are still under completion.

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2012)

ENAV has published the AIC A1/2011 about ‐Introduction of Precision RNAV (P‐RNAV) in the Terminal Airspace of Italy‐ on 21 Apr 2011 and has officially introduced P‐RNAV procedures in June 2011 in Milan and Rome TMAs. ATCOs specific training has been already. P‐RNAV SIDs and STARs have been implemented at selected Control Zones and training has been provided to Approach Control ATCOs. Some specific items are still under completion.

For the military, all relevant actions have been completed.

P‐RNAV navigation support tools

Late

31/12/2015


NAV10

Implement APV procedures

Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

ENAV is working at a national level on an implementation plan of APV/BARO and APV/SBAS inside a frame work of a joint National Task Force with Italian Regulator and Italian Air Force. The main outcome of the Task Force was the publication of a national implementation plan for PBN operations in general and of APV approaches specifically, in 2012. Currently several experimental studies on APV/SBAS approaches for helicopters has been undertaken by ENAV.

31/12/2016

REG (By:04/2016)

ENAC set up a WG on PBN in order to prepare a radio navigation plan referred to satellite navigation.

Completed

‐

ASP (By:12/2016)

ENAV is working at a national level on an implementation plan of APV/BARO and APV/SBAS inside a frame work of a joint National Task Force with Italian Regulator and Italian Air Force. The task force has defined a national implementation plan for PBN operations in general and of APV approaches specifically. ENAV has started the introduction of APV/SBAS approaches inside National Airspace. A National Safety Case for the introduction of GNSS approaches inside Italian airspace has been defined and approved by the Regulator; the Safety Case is currently under revision in order to update some mitigations and to include the APV/BARO in the scope. ENAV has already started the implementation of LNAV, APV/SBAS and APV/BARO flight instrument procedures.

Planned

31/12/2016

SAF10

Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

Timescales:


Completed

ENAC introduced the adoption of the Airspace Infringement Plan of Eurocontrol in the ENAC Safety Plan for 2012. All regulatory actions have been completed. ENAV has put into practice the reccomendations and actions listed in the European Action Plan for Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction

‐

REG (By:12/2011)

ENAC introduced the adoption of the Airspace Infringement Plan of Eurocontrol in the ENAC Safety Plan for 2012. All regulatory actions have been completed

Completed

‐

ASP (By:12/2011)

ENAV has put into practice the recommendations and actions listed in the European Action Plan for Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction

Completed

‐

MIL (By:12/2011)

Most of the best practices are implemented by ITAF through the civil military coordination mechanism. Flight Information coordination and provision, by military ATC, are in place at ACC level.

Completed

‐


SAF11

Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions

Timescales:


Planned

ENAV, ITAF and italian airports have implemented the applicable measures of the Action Plan. 31/01/2018

REG (By:01/2018)

ENAC has plans to implement the relevant part of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions

Planned

31/01/2018

ASP (By:12/2014)

ENAV and ITAF have implemented the applicable measures of the Action Plan.

Completed

‐

APO (By:12/2014)

Italian airports have implemented the applicable measures of the Action Plan

Completed

‐

SRC‐RLMK

Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs)


Timescales:


Not Applicable

Italy is not in the Applicability Area of this Objective ‐

REG (By:12/2010) Italy is not in the Applicability Area of this Objective

Not Applicable

‐

SRC‐SLRD

Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies


Timescales:


Not Applicable

Italy is not in the Applicability Area of this Objective ‐

REG (By:12/2010) Italy is not in the Applicability Area of this Objective

Not Applicable

‐


Annexes

Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Point for ITALY ENAV Mariagrazia LA PISCOPIA

LSSIP Focal Point for ENAC ENAC Luca Valerio FALESSI

LSSIP Focal Point for ITAF Italian Air Force Emanuele CAMMAROTO

LSSIP Focal Point for ENAV ENAV Mariagrazia LA PISCOPIA

LSSIP Contact Person for ITALY EUROCONTROL Bernd HILL

ESSIP Objective Implementation

ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI (E. REUBER till 02/2015)

A. DYBOWSKA Alessandro GIANNANGELI

AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Amedeo BELLI

AOM21 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Debora PALOMBI

AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC Maria Grazia BECHERE

AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Maria Grazia BECHERE

AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Maria Grazia BECHERE

AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Antonio NUZZO

ATC02.2 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Carlo FACCHINI




ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Amedeo BELLI

ATC12 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Amedeo BELLI

ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Amedeo BELLI

ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL’ORTO Fiorenza MAZZOTTI

ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO Carlo FACCHINI

COM09 L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Giovanni ACETO

COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA Giovanni ACETO

COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA Albino MARTUSCELLI

ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL Teresa DI LALLO

ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL Teresa DI LALLO

FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Debora PALOMBI

FCM03 S. SMIDT O. CIOARA Andrea FUMASONI

FCM04 M. RICHARD O. CIOARA Debora PALOMBI

FCM05 P. MATERN O. CIOARA Debora PALOMBI

INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Andrea FUMASONI

INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Giulio MELILLI

ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Carlo FACCHINI

ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Giulio MELILLI

ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA Fulvio LECCI


ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET O. ALFARO Silvio ZAPPI

ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO Carlo FACCHINI

ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Giovanni ACETO

ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA Carlo FACCHINI

NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Leonardo NICOLO’

NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA Leonardo NICOLO’

SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Roberto FILIPPINI

SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT Maria Grazia BECHERE

SRC-RLMK M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA N/A

SRC-SLRD M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA N/A


Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts

ENAC ORGANISATION CHART valid up to 28/02/14


ENAC ORGANISATION CHART since 01/03/2014


ENAV SpA ORGANISATION CHART

Ownership:Ministry of Economy

Supervisory:Ministry of Transport

ENAV Organization Chart as of March 6, 2015

Board of Directors

ENAV - Asia Pacific Sdn. Bhd.

Audit

Human Resources Administration, Finance and Control

International Strategies

BusinessDevelopment

Quality and Management Systems

Legal and Corporate Affairs Communications Brand

Development

Geopolitical Analyses

Nastional Air Transport

Organizations

Logistics and Support Services Academy

Safety Security

Techno Sky S.r.l. Consorzio SICTA

Purchasing Operations Department

Technical Department

General Director

Part of ENAV Group Core Business Units


ITAF ANS ORGANISATION CHART


Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations

ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance System

ACC Area Control Center

ADEXP ATS exchange presentation

ADS Automatic Dependent Surveillance

AF ATM Functionality

AIS Aeronautical Information Service

AMAN Arrival Management

ANS Air navigation services

ANSV Agenzia Nazionale per la Sicurezza del Volo,/ Italian Flight Safety Agency

AOP Airport operations

APP Approach Control Service

ARN Area Route Network

ASM Airspace Management Service

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATCO Air Traffic Control Officer

ATFM Air Traffic Flow Management

ATM Air Traffic Management

ATS Air Traffic Services

CNS/ATM Communication Navigation Surveillance/Air Traffic Management

COM Communication

EAD European AIS Data Base

EASA European Aviation Safety Agency

EC European Commission/Community

ECAC European Civil Aviation Conference

EGNOS European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service

ETFMS Enhanced tactical flow management system

ENAC Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile

ENAV S.p.A. Ente Nazionale di Assistenza al Volo S.p.A.

ENV Environment

ESA European Space Agency

EU European Union

EUROCONTROL European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation

FIR Flight Information Region

FPL Flight Plan

FT Fast Track

FUA Flexible Use of Airspace

GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System

GPS Global positioning system

ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation

ILS Instrument Landing System

ITAF Italian Air Force

MCW Ministry of Communications and Works

MET Meteorology

MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs

MoD Ministry of Defence


MSAW Minimum safe altitude warning

MTCD Medium term conflict detection

NOTAM Notice to Airmen

PCP Pilot common Project

PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme

OLDI On Line Data Interface

RNAV Area Navigation S-AF Sub ATM Functionality

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) ITALY - Eurocontrol · Year 2014 - Level 1 Local Single Sky...

Documents

Transcript of Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) ITALY - Eurocontrol · Year 2014 - Level 1 Local Single Sky...