Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information preferences Joan M....
-
Upload
annabella-rich -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information preferences Joan M....
Gender differences in Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information attitudes and information preferencespreferences
Joan M. Griffin, PhD Joan M. Griffin, PhD
Greta Friedemann-SGreta Friedemann-Sáánchez, PhDnchez, PhD
Diana Burgess, PhD Diana Burgess, PhD
Melissa Partin, PhDMelissa Partin, PhD
BackgroundBackground
Colorectal cancer is the 3Colorectal cancer is the 3rdrd most most common cancer and the 3common cancer and the 3rdrd leading leading cause of cancer deaths. cause of cancer deaths.
Adherence to screening guidelines Adherence to screening guidelines has been found to reduce mortality. has been found to reduce mortality.
Several studies have found women Several studies have found women are less likely to be adherent to are less likely to be adherent to colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines than men. than men.
BackgroundBackground
Sources of the screening gender gap are Sources of the screening gender gap are unknown. unknown.
Some possible reasons for the gap Some possible reasons for the gap include: include:
Differences in mode preference (men Differences in mode preference (men prefer endoscopy; women prefer FOBT). prefer endoscopy; women prefer FOBT). Differences in barriers.Differences in barriers.Differences in facilitators. Differences in facilitators.
Exploratory Sequential Exploratory Sequential DesignDesign
1. Focus Groups
2. Survey
Generate Hypotheses
Develop Items
Cognitive Interviews
Qualitative Analysis
QuantAnalysis
QuantResults
Qual Results
Qualitative research Qualitative research main findings*main findings*SIMILAR PREFERENCESSIMILAR PREFERENCES
Men and women both prefer colonoscopy Men and women both prefer colonoscopy for screening. for screening.
BARRIERS/FACILITATORSBARRIERS/FACILITATORS
OverallOverall Perception that women were at lower risk for Perception that women were at lower risk for
CRC (CRC is a “male disease”)CRC (CRC is a “male disease”)
Endoscopy specificEndoscopy specific Fears of exposure, vulnerability for women. Fears of exposure, vulnerability for women.
Fear of pain for menFear of pain for men Different preferences for information about Different preferences for information about
tests.tests.**Friedemann-Sanchez, et al. 2007. Health Expectations. Friedemann-Sanchez, et al. 2007. Health Expectations.
ObjectivesObjectives
To assess gender differences in:To assess gender differences in:
CRC screening ratesCRC screening rates CRC screening mode preferences.CRC screening mode preferences. Barriers and facilitators for CRC Barriers and facilitators for CRC
screeningscreening
Hypotheses Hypotheses
SCREENING BEHAVIORSCREENING BEHAVIOR• Men will be more adherent to CRC Men will be more adherent to CRC
screening guidelines.screening guidelines.• Greater proportion of men than women Greater proportion of men than women
will screened by endoscopy (flex sig or will screened by endoscopy (flex sig or colonoscopy).colonoscopy).
SCREENING PREFERENCESSCREENING PREFERENCES• Men and women will not differ in mode Men and women will not differ in mode
preference for colonoscopy.preference for colonoscopy.
HypothesesHypotheses
BARRIERS TO SCREENINGBARRIERS TO SCREENING Women will be more likely to report Women will be more likely to report
affective barriers (embarrassment, affective barriers (embarrassment, exposure, vulnerability) to endoscopic exposure, vulnerability) to endoscopic screening procedures than menscreening procedures than men
Men will be more likely to report pain as Men will be more likely to report pain as a barrier to endoscopic screening a barrier to endoscopic screening procedures than womenprocedures than women
Women will report lower perceived risk Women will report lower perceived risk for CRCfor CRC
HypothesesHypotheses
FACILITATORS TO SCREENINGFACILITATORS TO SCREENING Women will report stronger Women will report stronger
preferences for information prior preferences for information prior to and during endoscopic to and during endoscopic procedures than men.procedures than men.
MethodsMethods
Cross-sectional, mixed mode (mail and Cross-sectional, mixed mode (mail and phone) surveyphone) survey
Male and female veterans, ages of 50-75 Male and female veterans, ages of 50-75 (600 men, 300 women)(600 men, 300 women)
Used the Minneapolis VAMC’s primary care Used the Minneapolis VAMC’s primary care services in the two years prior to the studyservices in the two years prior to the study
Those with colorectal cancer (CRC), Those with colorectal cancer (CRC), dementia or Alzheimer’s diagnoses dementia or Alzheimer’s diagnoses excludedexcluded
MeasuresMeasures
Adherence:Adherence: Self-report and VA Self-report and VA medical recordsmedical records
Preferences:Preferences: Single-item questionSingle-item questionBarriers:Barriers: Questions developed Questions developed
from qualitative from qualitative workwork and and Vernon’s perceived Vernon’s perceived risk risk for CRCfor CRC
Facilitators:Facilitators: Questions developed Questions developed from from qualitative workqualitative work
ResultsResults
WomeWomenn
MenMen p-p-valuevalue
Age (mean)Age (mean) 59.259.2 62.462.4 <0.01<0.01
Marital status (% Marital status (% married)married)
49.449.4 59.559.5 0.010.01
Income (% <$20,000)Income (% <$20,000) 34.134.1 41.241.2 NSNS
CRC family history (% CRC family history (% yes)yes)
24.924.9 20.620.6 NSNS
Overall response rate:Overall response rate: 77% 77%
(n=686, 241/300 women; 445/600 men)(n=686, 241/300 women; 445/600 men)
Demographics:Demographics:
Results-CRC adherence Results-CRC adherence determined by self-determined by self-reportreport% Guideline Adherent % Guideline Adherent (n=686)(n=686)
WomeWomenn
MenMen p-valuep-value
All modesAll modes 73.173.1 79.379.3 .08.08
FOBTFOBT 22.322.3 23.623.6 .72.72
Flex sigFlex sig 31.931.9 37.037.0 .12.12
Barium enemaBarium enema 11.411.4 17.117.1 .06.06
ColonoscopyColonoscopy 42.442.4 52.452.4 .02.02
Results-CRC adherence Results-CRC adherence determined by medical determined by medical recordrecord% Guideline Adherent % Guideline Adherent (n=686)(n=686)
WomeWomenn
MenMen p-valuep-value
All modesAll modes 49.449.4 53.53.33
NSNS
FOBTFOBT 19.119.1 20.20.22
NSNS
Flex sigFlex sig 25.325.3 27.27.22
NSNS
Barium enemaBarium enema 3.73.7 2.52.5 NSNS
ColonoscopyColonoscopy 18.318.3 20.20.22
NSNS
ResultsResults
Report to records ratio Report to records ratio
WomeWomenn
MenMen p-valuep-value
All modesAll modes 1.081.08 1.11.177
NSNS
FOBTFOBT 1.381.38 1.21.277
NSNS
Flex sigFlex sig 1.311.31 1.31.366
NSNS
Barium enemaBarium enema 3.03.0 9.09.0 NSNS
ColonoscopyColonoscopy 1.241.24 1.51.533
<.05<.05
ResultsResultsResults-PreferencesResults-Preferences
Mode preference % (n=686)Mode preference % (n=686)
WomeWomenn
MenMen pp<<
FOBTFOBT 29.129.1 25.825.8 NSNS
Barium EnemaBarium Enema 2.62.6 2.72.7 NSNS
Flex sigFlex sig 8.58.5 8.28.2 NSNS
ColonoscopyColonoscopy 41.041.0 39.039.0 NSNS
Don’t want to be Don’t want to be tested*tested*
5.15.1 2.52.5 .05.05
Don’t know*Don’t know* 13.713.7 21.721.7 .01 .01
Results-BarriersResults-Barriers
Affective barriers (% who strongly Affective barriers (% who strongly agree or agree)agree or agree)
WomenWomen MenMen pp<<
Worry about Worry about vulnerabilityvulnerability
36.836.8 20.120.1 .0.011
Worry about body Worry about body exposedexposed
35.135.1 13.513.5 .0.011
Tests are embarrassingTests are embarrassing 35.135.1 13.013.0 .0.011
Results-BarriersResults-Barriers
Anxiety about pain as a barrier (% Anxiety about pain as a barrier (% who strongly agree or agree)who strongly agree or agree)
WomenWomen MenMen pp<<
Worry tests will be Worry tests will be painfulpainful
44.744.7 27.527.5 .0.011
Want medicine for pain Want medicine for pain before testbefore test
56.656.6 52.652.6 NSNS
Results-BarriersResults-Barriers
Perceived risk (% who strongly agree Perceived risk (% who strongly agree or agree)or agree)
WomeWomenn
MenMen pp<<
Chance I might get CRC Chance I might get CRC is highis high
15.215.2 24.724.7 .01.01
Very likely I will get CRCVery likely I will get CRC 5.15.1 7.27.2 .01.01
Chance of getting Chance of getting polyps highpolyps high
15.915.9 18.718.7 NSNS
Results-FacilitatorsResults-Facilitators
Information needs (% who strongly Information needs (% who strongly agree or agree)agree or agree)
WomeWomenn
MenMen pp<<
Before exam, want to Before exam, want to learn what exam will be learn what exam will be like like
93.493.4 89.889.8 NSNS
During exam, want to During exam, want to know what is happening know what is happening at every stepat every step
78.278.2 67.267.2 .01.01
I don’t want any detailsI don’t want any details 13.113.1 15.915.9 .03.03
ConclusionsConclusionsSelf-reports of screening behavior shows a gender Self-reports of screening behavior shows a gender gap in screening; medical record data do not. gap in screening; medical record data do not.
• Gender gap in screening may be due to the fact that Gender gap in screening may be due to the fact that men are more likely to over report having been men are more likely to over report having been screened.screened.
Men and women have similar screening mode Men and women have similar screening mode preferences.preferences.
Differences in screening barriers/facilitatorsDifferences in screening barriers/facilitators• Women have more affective, anxiety-related barriers. Women have more affective, anxiety-related barriers. • Men have a higher perceived risk for developing CRC.Men have a higher perceived risk for developing CRC.• Women and men prefer different types of information Women and men prefer different types of information
before and during endoscopy exams.before and during endoscopy exams.
Future Directions for Future Directions for Research and PolicyResearch and Policy Future research examining gender Future research examining gender
differences in CRC screening should use differences in CRC screening should use medical record data. medical record data.
Need to test if strength of association Need to test if strength of association between barriers/facilitators that vary by between barriers/facilitators that vary by gender affect screening adherence. If so: gender affect screening adherence. If so: – Campaigns to promote screening should Campaigns to promote screening should
include efforts to reduce beliefs that CRC is a include efforts to reduce beliefs that CRC is a male disease. male disease.
– Issues of exposure, vulnerability and Issues of exposure, vulnerability and embarrassment prior to and during exam embarrassment prior to and during exam should be considered through patient should be considered through patient education.education.
Adherence-subsample Adherence-subsample with complete medical with complete medical recordsrecords% Guideline adherent based on self % Guideline adherent based on self report (n=345)report (n=345)
WomeWomenn
MenMen p-valuep-value
All modesAll modes 79.579.5 84.84.77
.23.23
FOBTFOBT 25.025.0 24.24.99
.98.98
Flex sigFlex sig 38.838.8 39.39.44
.92.92
Barium enemaBarium enema 10.910.9 18.18.66
.08.08
ColonoscopyColonoscopy 45.245.2 60.60.44
<.01<.01
Adherence-subsample Adherence-subsample with complete medical with complete medical recordsrecords% Guideline Adherent by medical % Guideline Adherent by medical record (n=345)record (n=345)
WomeWomenn
MenMen p-valuep-value
All modesAll modes 71.171.1 72.72.88
NSNS
FOBTFOBT 18.818.8 21.21.77
NSNS
Flex sigFlex sig 32.032.0 31.31.88
NSNS
Barium enemaBarium enema 4.74.7 2.82.8 NSNS
ColonoscopyColonoscopy 36.736.7 38.38.22
NSNS