Tritium Extraction from a DCLL Blanket Prepared by: Scott Willms (LANL) Collaborators: Brad Merrill...
-
Upload
merilyn-scott -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Tritium Extraction from a DCLL Blanket Prepared by: Scott Willms (LANL) Collaborators: Brad Merrill...
Tritium Extraction from a DCLL Blanket
Prepared by: Scott Willms (LANL)
Collaborators: Brad Merrill (INL), Siegfried Malang (Consultant), Clement Wong (GA), Dai-Kai Sze (UCSD)
Presented by: Jim Coons (LANL)
Coordinating Meeting on R&D for
Tritium and Safety Issues in Lead-Lithium Breeders
11 June 2007
Idaho Falls, ID
LA-UR-05-1711
Outline
•DCLL process overview•Conventional separator•T removal via vacuum permeator•Model•Mass transfer coefficient•Parametric study•DEMO design•Issues•Conclusions
DCLL process overview
T2/BreederSeparator
HeatExchanger
Breeder, T2, He
Breeder
T2
Breeding
He, T2
Breeder, T2
T2, He
He
Permeator
T2
He, T2
He
Permeator
To Tritium Plant
T2
To Tritium Plant
Dual CoolantBlanket
HeatExchanger
He
He
Use He to strip T from PbLi
T permeation thru HX tubes
Recover tritium from He
Recover tritium from He
He loop
He loop
PbLi loop
Avg. T2 breeding rate: 0.024 sccm
Pressure in T2 separator tank if all tritium is contained (no permeation, no stripping, etc.)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (days)
Tri
tiu
m P
arti
al P
ress
ure
(at
m)
Rough estimate for tritium removal pathways from PbLi with both tank pump off and HX permeation
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (days)
Tri
tiu
m R
em
ov
ed
(g
m)
Total tritium removed
Tritium removed by permeation through HX tubes
Tritium removed by mass transfer (through collection tank)
Evaluating the possibility of using a vacuum permeator for tritium separation from Pb-Li
Use Permeator to recover T from PbLi
T permeation thru HX tubes
Recover tritium from He
Recover tritium from He
He loop
He loop
PbLi loop
Avg. T2 breeding rate: 0.024 sccm
Low Pressure Permeator Experimental Apparatus
66.0cm.
10.2cm.
Feed(Inert/H 2)
Retentate(Inert)Permeate
(H 2)
27.7 cm (10.9")
total length x
0.318 cm
(0.125") dia.
Pd/Ag Tube
0.635 cm
(0.25") dia.
Stainless Steel
Tube
To Vacuum
(26")
(4")
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Feed Flowrate (sccm)
Pre
ss
ure
(to
rr)
Retentate Partial Pressure
Permeate Pressure
Constant 25 sccm H2
Increasing N2
450 C
With 25 sccm H2, the retentate and permeate are initially in agreement and ultimately breakthrough is observed at about 375 sccm.
--Willms, R. Scott, Pamela R. Arzu, Kevin G. Honnell and Stephen A. Birdsell; "Initial Testing Of A Low Pressure Permeator For Tritium Processing"; Fusion Engineering and Design, 49-50, 963-970 (2000)
Mathematical model for PbLi/T permeator
• A component balance describes the tritium mass fraction along the membrane length
• Tritium transport to the membrane surface is described by a mass transfer coefficient
• The effective tritium partial pressure at the membrane surface is given by the solubility
• Permeation depends on the permeability
F, Ci F, Ci
Gtot
z
Dz
G
PbLi, T
T2
PbLi, T
Membrane
F
GMWD
dz
dx
0xxMW
kN i
mi
2
0
sr k
xp
prp pp
l
k
A
GG _
Comparison of mass transfer coefficient results
0.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
0.0040
1. P
late,
Lam
inar
2. W
ette
d Tub
e/Plat
e, L
am/T
urb
3. P
late,
Lam
/Tur
b
4. W
ette
d Tub
e, T
urbu
lent
5. ?
6. P
late,
Tur
bulen
t
7. T
ube,
Tur
bulen
t
8. T
ube,
Tur
bulen
t
9. T
ube,
Tur
bulen
t
10. P
acke
d Bed
, Tur
bulen
t
Mas
s T
ran
sfer
Co
effi
cien
t (m
/s)
The mass transfer coefficient for this system was estimated from general correlations
• 10 general correlations were considered
• The following correlation appeared to be the most appropriate:
--Harriott and Hamilton, Chem Engr Sci, 20, 1073, 1965
• However, this correlation was developed with benzoic acid and glycerin-water mixtures at room temperature—considerably different from 700 C PbLi and tritium
346.0913.0Re0096.0 ScD
Dk
AB
m
xi
x0
pr
pp
permeation through membrane
liq bulk-to-surface mass xfer
liq to solid xfer
solid to gas xfer
Values used to solve the model
Description Value Value in other units Temperature 973.150 K 700 C Permeate Pressure 1.32E-008 atm 1.E-5 torr Membrane Diameter 0.01 m 1 cm Membrane wall thickness 5.00E-4 m 500 microns Area for flow of PbLi 7.85E-05 m2 Molecular weight of tritium 0.006 kg/mol 6 gm/mole Tritium solubility in PbLi 0.162 mol T/m3/atm^0.5 Tritium solubility in PbLi 5.5E-8 kg T/kg PbLi/atm^0.5 Diffusivity of tritium in PbLi 8.87E-9 m2/s Tritium solubility in Nb 6740 mol T/m3/atm^0.5 Tritium diffusivity in Nb 1.24E-8 m2/s Permeability of tritium in Nb 4.16E-5 mol T2/m/s/atm^0.5 Viscosity of PbLi 7.4E-4 kg/m/s Density of PbLi 8813 kg/m3 Flow velocity 5 m/s Volumetric flowrate 3.93E-4 m3/s Schmidt Number 9.47 Reynolds Number 595000. Mass transfer coefficient 3.47E-3 m/s Beta-Collection of constants 61200 Mass fraction of T in feed 2.E-10 1.E-2 torr partial pressure
Using these base conditions the tritium concentration down the length of the permeator was determined
0.0E+00
5.0E-11
1.0E-10
1.5E-10
2.0E-10
2.5E-10
0 5 10 15
Distance along tube (m)
Mas
s fr
acti
on
of
trit
ium
in
Pb
Li
0.E+00
2.E-03
4.E-03
6.E-03
8.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-02
Eq
uil
ibri
um
par
tial
p o
f T
ove
r P
bL
i (t
orr
)
Practical Length of Tube?
Exit Conc. Target
Performance depends strongly on the mass transfer coefficient
0.0E+00
5.0E-11
1.0E-10
1.5E-10
2.0E-10
2.5E-10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Distance along membrane tube (m)
Mas
s fr
acti
on
of
trit
ium
in
Pb
Li
0.05 m/s
0.005 m/s
0.0005 m/s
0.00005 m/s
km=0.0035 m/s (base case)
0.5 m/s
1.3 Pa (1x10-2 torr)
0.0013 Pa (1x10-5 torr)
Exit Conc. Target
Wall thickness
0.00E+00
5.00E-11
1.00E-10
1.50E-10
2.00E-10
2.50E-10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Distance along tube (m)
Mas
s fr
acti
on
of
trit
ium
in
Pb
Li
Wall=0.0005 m(base case)
Wall=0.005 m
Wall=0.00005
Exit Conc. Target
Surface Concentration
0.00E+00
5.00E-11
1.00E-10
1.50E-10
2.00E-10
2.50E-10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Distance along tube (m)
Mas
s fr
acti
on
of
trit
ium
in
Pb
Li
In bulk
At tube surface
Exit Conc. Target
Permeability
0.00E+00
5.00E-11
1.00E-10
1.50E-10
2.00E-10
2.50E-10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Distance along tube (m)
Mas
s fr
acti
on
of
trit
ium
in
Pb
Li
kp=Nb (base case)
kp=Nb/10 (like Pd)
kp=Nb/100
kp=Nb/1000 (like Fe)
Exit Conc. Target
PbLi Flowrate
0.00E+00
5.00E-11
1.00E-10
1.50E-10
2.00E-10
2.50E-10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Distance along tube (m)
Mas
s fr
acti
on
of
trit
ium
in
Pb
Li
v=0.5 m/s
v=2.5 m/s
v=5 m/s (base case)
v=10 m/s
v=50 m/s
Exit Conc. Target
Feed concentration
1.00E-12
1.00E-11
1.00E-10
1.00E-09
1.00E-08
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Distance along tube (m)
Mas
s fr
acti
on
tri
tiu
m i
n P
bL
i
x0=2x10-11
x0=2x10-10(base case)
x0=2x10-9
Exit Conc. Target
Tube diameter does significantly affect performance
Tube Diameter
0.00E+00
5.00E-11
1.00E-10
1.50E-10
2.00E-10
2.50E-10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Distance along tube (m)
Mas
s fr
acti
on
of
trit
ium
in
Pb
Li
D=0.005 D=0.01 m (base case)
D=0.02 m
Exit Conc. Target
Permeate pressure
0.00E+00
5.00E-11
1.00E-10
1.50E-10
2.00E-10
2.50E-10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Distance along tube (m)
Mas
s fr
acti
on
tri
tiu
m i
n P
bL
i
Pperm=1x10-6 torr
Pperm=1x10-5 torr (base case)
Pperm=1x10-4 torr
Exit Conc. Target
Considerations for a practical PbLi permeator
• PbLi flowrate for Demo: 26270 kg/s• With 1 cm dia. tubes and 5 m/s flow velocity: 7592 tubes• Total Nb required for 5 m tubes: 2.6 tons• Total cost for Nb: ~$0.5M (?)• Diameter of vessel to contain tube cross sections + twice that
area for space between tubes: 1.7 m
This permeator is a substantial vessel, but one that can practically be constructed
While this initial analysis indicates that a PbLi permeator may be feasible, there are many issues that must be resolved
• Measured mass transfer coefficients for the PbLi-T system• Compatibility of PbLi with Nb at 700 C• Additional resistances to tritium permeation such as surface
resistance?• At the PbLi-membrane interface, is the effective partial pressure
exerted by tritium indeed given by the solubility equation? (this may be a very different mechanism with a very different rate)
• What pressure can be practically maintained on the permeate side of the membranes?
• Will Nb tubes degrade due to reactions such as oxidation? Will a surface treatment be needed?
Conclusions
• Tritium permeation through the heat exchanger materials will be substantial and cannot be neglected
• Tritium can be recovered from helium streams with gas permeators and other technologies
• A reasonable plan for ITER TBM ancillary equipment is to include a helium bubbler on the PbLi loop and permeators on both He loops
• A potentially attractive option is a PbLi permeator to directly remove tritium from PbLi. Based on present information such a device might be practical.
• Whether or not it is actually practical would require considerable R&D