Willms - OECD PISA for Development

53
1 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) for Development Initial Technical Meeting 27 28 June 2013 J. Douglas Willms University of New Brunswick

Transcript of Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Page 1: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

1

Programme for

International Student

Assessment (PISA) for

Development

Initial Technical Meeting

27 – 28 June 2013

J. Douglas Willms University of New Brunswick

Page 2: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 3: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Design and

Technical Issues

Page 4: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

I. Measuring Student Performance

Page 5: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Successful

countries have

fewer vulnerable

children. Their skill

distribution is

negatively skewed.

Page 6: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Science Performance

Level 1 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

Le

ve

l 6

700

Level 6

600500400300100 800

Level 2

200

Proportion of Students

Qatar

Below Level 1

Argentina

LithuaniaHong Kong

Below Level 1

Page 7: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 -0.0 0.1

300

350

400

450

500

550

Mean Reading Performance

Distribution Skewness

Page 8: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Mean grade 4 reading scores versus skewness of the distribution. Source: Prova Brazil 2007.

Page 9: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Student assessments cover a narrow range of skills.

Page 10: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

The ability to

read is a

fundamental skill

for children’s

success at

school, and

ultimately for

their long-term

health and well-

being.

‘The simple view of

reading’ (Rose, 2006)

has two critical,

complementary

dimensions:

Code-related skills – the

ability to recognize and

understand particular

words, and

Language skills – being

able to understand and

interpret spoken and

written language.

Page 11: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 12: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 13: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

The PISA framework is consistent with Bloom’s Taxonomy

for Assessment

Taxonomy for Teaching, Learning,

and Assessing

(revised Bloom’s taxonomy)

PISA Framework for Reading Literacy

Access and Retrieve Integrate and Interpret Reflect and Evaluate

Co

gn

itiv

e P

roc

es

sin

g D

ime

ns

ion

Creating (evaluation)

Locate and organize several

pieces of deeply embedded info

with precision and attention to

detail

Make multiple inferences,

comparisons and contrasts,

detailed and precise

Integrate information

from more than one text

Evaluating (synthesis)

Locate and organize several

pieces of deeply embedded info

Infer which information is

relevant

Critically evaluate or

hypothesize, draw on

specialized knowledge

Analyzing (analysis)

Locate and organize several

pieces of embedded info

Interpret nuances of

meaning, understand and

apply categories in

unfamiliar text

Make hypotheses,

critically evaluate a text

Applying (application)

Locate and recognize relationships

among several pieces

Integrate several pieces of

text to identify main idea,

understand a relationship,

or construe meaning

Understand connections,

comparisons,

explanations

Understanding (comprehension)

Locate 1 or more pieces of

information

Recognize main idea,

understand relationships,

construe meaning

Connect text with outside

knowledge

Remembering (knowledge)

Locate one piece of information in

simple text

Recognize main theme or

purpose in familiar text,

recognize simple idea.

Make simple connection

with everyday knowledge

Page 14: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

LESSONS LEARNED: We cannot simply add more items at the lower end of the current PISA

framework, especially if we are to assess the skills of out-of-school students

Many students will not have successfully made the transition from learning-to-

read to reading-to-learn. We need measures of pre-literacy skills, especially

code-related and language skills.

.

Page 15: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

15

II. Drivers of Student Performance

Page 16: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Success is Cumulative International test scores (e.g., TIMSS, PISA) are

the cumulative result of children’s learning at

home and at school since birth (or even earlier)

Page 17: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Learning is a function of:

Context

Quality Instruction

Learning Time

Engagement

17

Page 18: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Engagement is a function of:

Context

Quality Instruction

Learning Time

Learning

18

Page 19: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

19

Context

Quality Instruction

Learning Time

Engagement begets Learning Learning begets Engagement

Learning

Engagement

Page 20: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 21: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

LESSONS LEARNED: If we want to understand children’s academic success in low income

countries, we need to assess their opportunities for learning over their school

career. The traditional drivers of school climate measured at age 15 will not

be that helpful. We would learn more from a detailed assessment of school

resources and strong measures of the quality of teaching.

Page 22: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

III. Intervention Forecasting

Page 23: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Early Years

Evaluation for

Responsive

Tiered Instruction

A prediction model based

on longitudinal data

Page 24: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 25: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

LESSONS LEARNED:

The revised PISA academic measures can gives us a portrait of the end

results. However, if we can identify some of the key aspects of school human

and physical resources that students have been exposed to over their

schooling career, we can begin to build prediction models.

Such models are very powerful for allocating resources.

Page 26: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

IV.

Allocation of

Resources

Page 27: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 28: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 29: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 30: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 31: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 32: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 33: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Use modern scaling

techniques to scale

variables and

identify cut-points

related to desired

standards.

33

Page 34: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

34

Page 35: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 36: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Learning resource plot for Brazil

Correlation with SES

0.02

0.25

0.40

-0.16

0.30

0.02

-0.29

-0.20

0.65

-0.23

Page 37: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

LESSONS LEARNED: We need a strong measure of socioeconomic

status that can be used cross-nationally.

We also need to build a more comprehensive

model of school resources. Imagine if we had

a model of physical and human resources

that was comparable to our achievement

measures, with 4 or 5 levels. For example,

schools without the basic physical

infrastructure (plumbing, heating, basic

teaching resources) would be at Level 1,

while schools with high levels of resources

(well-equipped library, trained teachers that

demonstrate high-yield strategies) would be

at Level 5.

Page 38: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

V. Equality and Equity

Page 39: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Equality refers to differences in the distribution of outcomes among sub-populations, especially

between high- and low-status groups.

Page 40: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Equity refers to fairness – a just

treatment of people from different

sub-populations. 40

Page 41: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

41

An Approach for

Assessing Quality,

Equality, and

Inequity

Page 42: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 43: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

43 RR=1.72 RR=1.54

Page 44: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

44 RR=1.28 RR=1.72

Page 45: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 46: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 47: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 48: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

LESSONS LEARNED: There are large inequalities in achievement that are entrenched in the social

and economic realities of each country.

The earlier PISA results have taken us some way toward understanding the

extent of inequalities. To move forward we need stronger measures of

inequities - the factors associated with inequalities and how these are

distributed among schools.

Page 49: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 350000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

GDP (2000 International $)

Canada

U.S.

KoreaFinland

Percent

Youth with reading literacy scores below Level 3

Germany

Japan

Page 50: Willms - OECD PISA for Development
Page 51: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

The

Pathway

to

Success

Page 52: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

Student Performance: measures of literacy skills

that stretch the scale down to pre-literacy skills

(e.g., code-related and language skills)

Drivers of Performance: measures that capture

students’ opportunities to learn from an early age.

Intervention Forecasting: models that will better

predict long-term outcomes.

Resource Allocation: a strong measure of

socioeconomic status that can be used cross-

nationally; a comprehensive model of school

resources.

Inequality and Inequity: stronger measures of

inequities - the factors associated with inequalities

and how these are distributed among schools.

Page 53: Willms - OECD PISA for Development

http://www.unb.ca/crisp

http://www.ksiresearch.com

http://www.thelearningbar.com

53