Tomohisa Takimi (TIFR)
description
Transcript of Tomohisa Takimi (TIFR)
11
An anisotropic hybrid non-perturbative formulation for N=2 4d non-commutative supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories.
Tomohisa Takimi (TIFR)Ref) Tomohisa Takimi arXiv:1205.7038 [hep-lat]
8th June 2012 at (NTU)
2
1. Introduction1. Introduction
Supersymmetric gauge theoryOne solution of hierarchy problem Dark Matter, AdS/CFT correspondence
Important issue for particle physics
2
*Dynamical SUSY breaking. *Study of AdS/CFT
Non-perturbative study is important
3
In some cases, we can investigate the non-perturbative quantity in the analytic way,
(For example, by utilizing the duality, holomorphy, so on.)
But if we want to calculate wider class of general dynamical quantities not relying on such structures, direct numerical calculation would be stronger. (For example, non-holomorphic quantities or quantities not restricted by the Chiral properties..)
4
Lattice: Lattice: A non-perturbative method
lattice construction of SUSY field theory is difficultlattice construction of SUSY field theory is difficult..
Fine-tuning problem
SUSY breaking Difficult
* taking continuum limit* numerical study
5
Fine-tuning problem
Difficult to perform numerical analysis
Time for computation becomes huge.
To take the desired continuum limit.
SUSY breaking in the UV region
Many SUSY breaking counter terms appear;
is required.
prevents the restoration of the symmetry Fine-Fine-
tuningtuningof the too many parameters.
(To suppress the breaking term effects)
Whole symmetry must be recovered at the limit
6
Example). N=1 SUSY with matter fields
gaugino mass, scalar mass
fermion massscalar quartic coupling
Computation time grows as the power of the number of the relevant parameters
By standard lattice action.
(Plaquette gauge action + Wilson fermion action)
too many4 parameters
Lattice formulations free from fine-tuning
7
We call as BRST charge
{ ,Q}=P_
P
Q
A lattice model of Extended SUSY
preserving a partial SUSY
: does not include the translation
Does the BRST strategy work to solve the fine-tuning ?
(1) Let us check the 2-dimensional case
Let us consider the local operators
Mass dimensions
Quantum corrections of the operators are
Mass dimensions 2!
Super-renormalizable
Relevant or marginal operators show up only at 1-loop level.
Does the BRST strategy work to solve the fine-tuning ?
(1) Let us check the 2-dimensional case
Let us consider the local operators
Mass dimensions
Quantum corrections of the operators are
Mass dimensions 2!
Super-renormalizable
Relevant or marginal operators show up only at 1-loop level.
Irrelevant
Only following operators are relevant:
Relevant
No fermionic partner, prohibited by the SUSY on the
lattice At all order of perturbation, the
absence of the SUSY breaking quantum corrections are guaranteed, requiring no fine-tuning.
11
(2) 4 dimensional case,
If
dimensionless !
All order correction can be relevant or marginal remaining at continuum limit.
Operators with
12
(2) 4 dimensional case,
If
dimensionless !
All order correction can be relevant or marginal remaining at continuum limit.
Prohibited by SUSY and the SU(2)R symmetry on the lattice.
13
(2) 4 dimensional case,
If
dimensionless !
All order correction can be relevant or marginal remaining at continuum limit.
Marginal operators are not prohibited only by the SUSY on the lattice
14
Fine-tuning of 4 parameters are required.
The formulation has not been useful..
15
The reason why the four dimensions have been out of reach.
(1) UV divergences in four dimensions are too tough to be controlled only by little preserved SUSY on the lattice.
16
The reason why the four dimensions have been out of reach.
(1) UV divergences in four dimensions are too tough to be controlled only by little preserved SUSY on the lattice.
How should we manage ?
17
The reason why the four dimensions have been out of reach.
(1) UV divergences in four dimensions are too tough to be controlled only by little preserved SUSY on the lattice.
How should we manage ?
Anisotropic treatment !!
18
Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into
several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only
a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.
19
Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into
several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only
a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.
20
Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into
several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only
a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.
21
Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into
several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only
a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.
22
Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into
several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only
a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.
23
Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into
several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only
a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.
24
Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into
several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only
a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.(1) Even little SUSY on the
lattice can manage such mild divergences.
(2)A part of broken symmetry can be restored by the first step, to be helpful to suppress the UV divergences in the remaining steps.
25
Anisotropic treatment: (iii) We will take the continuum limit of
the remaining regularized directions. In this steps,
Symmetries restored in the earlier steps help to suppress tough UV divergences in higher dimensions.
26
Anisotropic treatment: (iii) We will take the continuum limit of
the remaining regularized directions. In this steps,
Symmetries restored in the earlier steps help to suppress tough UV divergences in higher dimensions.
The treatment with steps (i) ~ (iii)
will not require fine-tunings.
27
Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.
Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611
Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361
Hanada
JHEP 1011 (2010) 112
Supersymmetric regularized formulation on
Two-dimensional lattice regularized directions.
28
Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.
Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611
Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361
Hanada
JHEP 1011 (2010) 112
Supersymmetric regularized formulation on
(1) Taking continuum limit of
Full SUSY is recovered in the UV region
Theory on the
29
Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.
Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611
Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361
Hanada
JHEP 1011 (2010) 112
Supersymmetric regularized formulation on
(1) Taking continuum limit of
Full SUSY is recovered in the UV region
Theory on the
(2) Moyal plane limit or commutative limit of .
30
Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.
Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611
Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361
Hanada
JHEP 1011 (2010) 112
Supersymmetric regularized formulation on
(1) Taking continuum limit of
Full SUSY is recovered in the UV region
Theory on the
(2) Moyal plane limit or commutative limit of .
Bothering UV divergences are suppressed by fully recovered SUSY in the step (1)
31
Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.
Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611
Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361
Hanada
JHEP 1011 (2010) 112
Supersymmetric regularized formulation on
(1) Taking continuum limit of
Full SUSY is recovered in the UV region
Theory on the
(2) Moyal plane limit or commutative limit of .
Bothering UV divergences are suppressed by fully recovered SUSY in the step (1)
No fine-tunings !!
32
Our work
33
We construct the analogous model to
Hanada-Matsuura-Sugino
Advantages of our model: (1) Simpler and easier to put on a computer
(2) It can be embedded to the matrix model easily. (Because we use “deconstruction”)
Easy to utilize the numerical techniques
developed in earlier works.
34
Moreover, we resolve the biggest disadvantage of the deconstruction approach of Kaplan et al.
In the approach, to make the well defined lattice theory from the matrix model, we need to introduce SUSY breaking moduli fixing terms, SUSY on the lattice is eventually broken (in IR, still helps to protect from UV divergences)
35
Moreover, we resolve the biggest disadvantage of the deconstruction approach of Kaplan et al.
In the approach, to make the well defined lattice theory from the matrix model, we need to introduce SUSY breaking moduli fixing terms, SUSY on the lattice is eventually broken (in IR, still helps to protect from UV divergences)
We introduce a new moduli fixing term with preserving the SUSY on the lattice !!
36
Our Formulation
37
Outline of the way to construct.
38
(0) Starting from the Mass deformed 1 dimensional matrix model with 8SUSY
(Analogous to BMN matrix model)
Orbifolding & deconstruction
(1) Orbifold lattice gauge theory on
4 SUSY is kept on the lattice (UV)And moduli fixing terms will
preserve 2 SUSY
39
Momentum cut off
(2) Orbifold lattice gauge theory with momentum cut-off, (Hybrid regularization theory) Theory
on
Uplift to 4D by Fuzzy 2-sphere solution
Actually all of SUSY are broken but “harmless”
(3) Our non-perturbative formulation for 4D N=2 non-commutative SYM theories: Theory
on
40
Detail of how to construct.
41
(0) The Mass deformed 1 dimensional matrix model
With mN × mN matrices and with 8-SUSY
For later use, we will rewrite the model by complexified fields and decomposed spinor components.
42
43
We also pick up and focus on the specific 2 of 8 SUSY.
By using these 2 supercharges and spnior decomposition and complexified fields, we can rewrite the matrix model action by “the BTFT form”
44
The transformation laws are
45
The important property of
Global
generators
:doublets:triplet
If
46
The model has
symmetry with following charge assignment
singlet
Charge is unchanged under the
47
(1) Orbifold lattice gauge theory
(1) Orbifold lattice gauge theoryOrbifold projection operator on fields with
r-charge
49
(1) Orbifold lattice gauge theoryOrbifold projection operator on fields with
r-charge
Orbifold projection:Discarding the mN ×mN components except
the ones with
mN ×mN indices
50
Under the projection, matrix model fields become lattice fields
SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory
SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice
52
SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory
SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice
= # of site fermions
# of SUSY on the lattice = # of fermions with
53
SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory
SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice
= # of site fermions
# of SUSY on the lattice = # of fermions with
54
SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory
SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice
= # of site fermions
# of SUSY on the lattice = # of fermions with
4 fermions
55
SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory
SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice
= # of site fermions
# of SUSY on the lattice = # of fermions with
4 fermions
4SUSY is preserved on the lattice !!
56
Deconstruction and continuum limit.
*Orbifodling is just picking up the subsector of matrix model. (No space has appeared.)*No kinetic terms.
57
*Orbifodling is just picking up the subsector of matrix model. (No space has appeared.)*No kinetic terms.
To provide the kinetic term and continuum limit,
we expand the bosonic link fields around as
Deconstruction and continuum limit.
58
Continuum limit.
*By taking *If fluctuation around is
small, We can obtain the mass deformed 2d SYM with
8SUSY at the continuum limit
59
To provide the proper continuum limit, the fluctuation must be small enough compared with .
But in the SUSY gauge theory, there are flat directions which allows huge fluctuation.
We need to suppress the fluctuation by adding the moduli fixing terms
Moduli fixing terms.
These break the SUSY on the lattice eventually.
(Softly broken, so UV divergence will not be altered.)
60
Proposed new Moduli fixing terms with keeping SUSYWe proposed a new moduli fixing
terms without breaking SUSY !!
61
Proposed new Moduli fixing terms with keeping SUSYWe proposed a new moduli fixing
terms without breaking SUSY !!
We utilized the fact
61
If
62
Orbifold lattice action for 2d mass deformed SYM with moduli fixing terms is
63
64
65
(2) Momentum cut-off on the orbifold lattice theory.
66
To perform the numerical simulation, Remaining one continuum direction also
must be regularized.
We employ the momentum cut-off regularization in Hanada-Nishimura-ShingoTakeuchi
Momentum cut-off is truncating the Fourier expansion in the finite-volume
67
Momentum cut-off in gauge theory
To justify the momentum cut-off, we need to fix the gauge symmetry by the gauge fixing condition
These condition fix the large gauge transformation which allows the momentum to go beyond the cut-off.
68
Momentum cut-off action on (Hybrid regularized theory) after
gauge fixing.
69
And so on.. (Remaining parts are really boring, so I will omit the parts…)
70
Notes:
(1) About the gauge fixing.
71
Notes:
(1) About the gauge fixing.
Gauge fixing does not spoil the quantum computation based on the gauge symmetry, because it is just putting the BRS exact term to the action, which does not affect the computation of gauge invariant quantity.Rather we should take this fixing as being required to justify the momentum cut-off to be well defined.
Only for this purpose !!
72
Notes:
(2) The cut-off might break the gauge symmetry, is it O.K ?
73
Notes:
(2) The cut-off might break the gauge symmetry, is it O.K ?
O.K !
74
Notes:
(2) The cut-off might break the gauge symmetry, is it O.K ?
O.K ! If the gauge symmetry is recovered only by taking, completely no
problem. I would like to emphasize that what we are
interested in is the theory at , not the theory with finite cut-off.
There is no concern whether the regularized theory break the gauge sym. or not, since it is just a regularization.
75
Notes:
(2) The cut-off might break the gauge symmetry, is it O.K ?
O.K ! If the gauge symmetry is recovered only by taking, completely no
problem. I would like to emphasize that what we are
interested in is the theory at , not the theory with finite cut-off.
There is no concern whether the regularized theory break the gauge sym. or not, since it is just a regularization.
I will explain it later by including the quantum effects
76
(3) Uplifting to 4d by Fuzzy 2-sphere solution
77
Until here, the theory is still in the 2 dimensions.
We need to uplift the theory to 4 dimensions.
We will use the Fuzzy Sphere solutions!
78
Until here, the theory is still in the 2 dimensions.
We need to uplift the theory to 4 dimensions.
We will use the Fuzzy Sphere solutions!
Derivative operators along fuzzy S2
79
We expand the fields in the spherical harmonics:
80
We expand the fields in the spherical harmonics:
field on 2d
spherical harmonics(kind of Fourier basis) on Fuzzy S2
field variable on target 4d space.
81
We expand the fields in the spherical harmonics:
field on 2d
spherical harmonics(kind of Fourier basis) on Fuzzy S2
field variable on target 4d space.
Fuzzy Sphere solution does not break 8 SUSY at all !!
82
By this uplifting, we have completed the construction of non-perturbative formulation for N=2 4d non-commutative SYM theories.
83
How to take the target continuum theory
84
In our formulation, 4-dimensions are divided into 3-parrts.
Regularized by momentum cut-off
sitesparamete
rs
85
In our formulation, 4-dimensions are divided into 3-parrts.
Regularized by momentum cut-off
sitesparamete
rs
Task.
Which direction should we deal with first ?
86
Criteria.
In early lower dimensional stage, it is easier to handle the crude regularization breaking much symmetries.
87
Criteria.
In early lower dimensional stage, it is easier to handle the crude regularization breaking much symmetries.
We should undertake the crude regularization first !
88
Regularized by momentum cut-off
sitesparamete
rs
誰是壞人?
89
Regularized by momentum cut-off
sitesparamete
rs
就是你!!
You are so rude !!
90
Regularized by momentum cut-off
sitesparamete
rs
On the other hand,
BPS state, SUSY is well protected.
91
Then order of taking the limit becomes
92
We start from momentum cut-off directions.
93
In finite the theory is one-dimensional theory. There is no UV
divergences.
There is no quantum correction breaking 2 SUSY and gauge symmetry.
only by taking, orbifold lattice theory is recovered.
94
We start from momentum cut-off directions.
Repeating the renormalization discussion in the early stage of this talk….
Renormalization in the 2-dimensional case Let us consider the local operators
Mass dimensions
Quantum corrections of the operators are
Mass dimensions 2!
Super-renormalizable
Relevant or marginal operators show up only at 1-loop level.
Irrelevant
Only following operator is relevant:
Relevant
No fermionic partner, prohibited by the SUSY on the
lattice At all order of perturbation, the
absence of the SUSY breaking quantum corrections are guaranteed, no fine-tuning.
Only following operator is relevant:
Relevant
No fermionic partner, prohibited by the SUSY on the
lattice At all order of perturbation, the
absence of the SUSY breaking quantum corrections are guaranteed, no fine-tuning.
In this step, the full 8 SUSY is restored !!
98
We start from momentum cut-off directions.
99
In this step, since the full SUSY is preserved, we do not need to mind any quantum correction
100
In this step, since the full SUSY is preserved, we do not need to mind any quantum correction
No fine-tuning !!
101
Notes:
In the case of N=4 theory, we can continuously connect to the commutative theory in
102
Notes:
In the case of N=4 theory, we can continuously connect to the commutative theory in
On the other hand, N=2 theory, it is expected not to be continuously connectted to the commutative theory in
Our theory is a non-perturbative formulation for the non-commutative gauge theory, but it is useful enough to investigate the non-perturbative aspects of gauge theories.
103
SummarySummary
We provide a simple non-perturbative formulation for N=2 4-dimensional theories, which is easy to put on computer.
104
Moreover, we resolve the biggest disadvantage of the deconstruction approach of Kaplan et al.
In the approach, to make the well defined lattice theory from the matrix model, we need to introduce SUSY breaking moduli fixing terms, SUSY on the lattice is eventually broken (in IR, still helps to protect from UV divergences)
105
Anisotropic treatment is useful for controlling the UV divergences.
106
End わんたんら
107
Precise discussion
108
Only following diagrams can provide quantum corrections
Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling
109
Only following diagrams can provide quantum corrections
Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling
110
Momentum integration of the odd function
Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling
111
Momentum integration of the odd function
Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling
= 0
= 0
112
Momentum integration of the odd function
Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop
Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling
= 0
= 0
No quantum correction !!
113
114
It becomes the theory on
115
116