Tomohisa Takimi (TIFR)

116
1 1 An anisotropic hybrid non- perturbative formulation for N=2 4d non-commutative supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories. Tomohisa Takimi (TIFR) Ref) Tomohisa Takimi arXiv:1205.7038 [hep-lat] 8 th June 2012 at (NTU)

description

An anisotropic hybrid non-perturbative formulation for N=2 4d non-commutative supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories. Tomohisa Takimi (TIFR). Ref) Tomohisa Takimi arXiv:1205.7038 [hep-lat]. 8 th June 2012 at (NTU). 1. 1. Introduction. Supersymmetric gauge theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Tomohisa Takimi (TIFR)

Page 1: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

11

An anisotropic hybrid non-perturbative formulation for N=2 4d non-commutative supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories.

Tomohisa Takimi (TIFR)Ref) Tomohisa Takimi arXiv:1205.7038 [hep-lat]

8th June 2012 at (NTU)

Page 2: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

2

1. Introduction1. Introduction

Supersymmetric gauge theoryOne solution of hierarchy problem Dark Matter, AdS/CFT correspondence

Important issue for particle physics

2

*Dynamical SUSY breaking. *Study of AdS/CFT

Non-perturbative study is important

Page 3: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

3

In some cases, we can investigate the non-perturbative quantity in the analytic way,

(For example, by utilizing the duality, holomorphy, so on.)

But if we want to calculate wider class of general dynamical quantities not relying on such structures, direct numerical calculation would be stronger. (For example, non-holomorphic quantities or quantities not restricted by the Chiral properties..)

Page 4: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

4

Lattice: Lattice: A non-perturbative method

lattice construction of SUSY field theory is difficultlattice construction of SUSY field theory is difficult..

Fine-tuning problem

SUSY breaking Difficult

* taking continuum limit* numerical study

Page 5: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

5

Fine-tuning problem

Difficult to perform numerical analysis

Time for computation becomes huge.

To take the desired continuum limit.

SUSY breaking in the UV region

Many SUSY breaking counter terms appear;

is required.

prevents the restoration of the symmetry Fine-Fine-

tuningtuningof the too many parameters.

(To suppress the breaking term effects)

Whole symmetry must be recovered at the limit

Page 6: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

6

Example). N=1 SUSY with matter fields

gaugino mass, scalar mass

fermion massscalar quartic coupling

Computation time grows as the power of the number of the relevant parameters

By standard lattice action.

(Plaquette gauge action + Wilson fermion action)

too many4 parameters

Page 7: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

Lattice formulations free from fine-tuning

7

We call as BRST charge

{ ,Q}=P_

P

Q

A lattice model of Extended SUSY

preserving a partial SUSY

: does not include the translation

Page 8: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

Does the BRST strategy work to solve the fine-tuning ?

(1) Let us check the 2-dimensional case

Let us consider the local operators

Mass dimensions

Quantum corrections of the operators are

Mass dimensions 2!

Super-renormalizable

Relevant or marginal operators show up only at 1-loop level.

Page 9: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

Does the BRST strategy work to solve the fine-tuning ?

(1) Let us check the 2-dimensional case

Let us consider the local operators

Mass dimensions

Quantum corrections of the operators are

Mass dimensions 2!

Super-renormalizable

Relevant or marginal operators show up only at 1-loop level.

Irrelevant

Page 10: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

Only following operators are relevant:

Relevant

No fermionic partner, prohibited by the SUSY on the

lattice At all order of perturbation, the

absence of the SUSY breaking quantum corrections are guaranteed, requiring no fine-tuning.

Page 11: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

11

(2) 4 dimensional case,

If

dimensionless !

All order correction can be relevant or marginal remaining at continuum limit.

Operators with

Page 12: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

12

(2) 4 dimensional case,

If

dimensionless !

All order correction can be relevant or marginal remaining at continuum limit.

Prohibited by SUSY and the SU(2)R symmetry on the lattice.

Page 13: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

13

(2) 4 dimensional case,

If

dimensionless !

All order correction can be relevant or marginal remaining at continuum limit.

Marginal operators are not prohibited only by the SUSY on the lattice

Page 14: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

14

Fine-tuning of 4 parameters are required.

The formulation has not been useful..

Page 15: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

15

The reason why the four dimensions have been out of reach.

(1) UV divergences in four dimensions are too tough to be controlled only by little preserved SUSY on the lattice.

Page 16: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

16

The reason why the four dimensions have been out of reach.

(1) UV divergences in four dimensions are too tough to be controlled only by little preserved SUSY on the lattice.

How should we manage ?

Page 17: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

17

The reason why the four dimensions have been out of reach.

(1) UV divergences in four dimensions are too tough to be controlled only by little preserved SUSY on the lattice.

How should we manage ?

Anisotropic treatment !!

Page 18: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

18

Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into

several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only

a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.

Page 19: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

19

Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into

several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only

a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.

Page 20: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

20

Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into

several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only

a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.

Page 21: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

21

Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into

several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only

a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.

Page 22: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

22

Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into

several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only

a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.

Page 23: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

23

Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into

several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only

a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.

Page 24: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

24

Anisotropic treatment: (i) We separate the dimensions into

several parts in anisotropic way.(ii) We take the continuum limit of only

a part of the four directions. During this step, the theory is regarded as a lower dimensional theory, where the UV divergences are much milder than ones in four -dimensions.(1) Even little SUSY on the

lattice can manage such mild divergences.

(2)A part of broken symmetry can be restored by the first step, to be helpful to suppress the UV divergences in the remaining steps.

Page 25: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

25

Anisotropic treatment: (iii) We will take the continuum limit of

the remaining regularized directions. In this steps,

Symmetries restored in the earlier steps help to suppress tough UV divergences in higher dimensions.

Page 26: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

26

Anisotropic treatment: (iii) We will take the continuum limit of

the remaining regularized directions. In this steps,

Symmetries restored in the earlier steps help to suppress tough UV divergences in higher dimensions.

The treatment with steps (i) ~ (iii)

will not require fine-tunings.

Page 27: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

27

Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.

Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611

Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361

Hanada

JHEP 1011 (2010) 112

Supersymmetric regularized formulation on

Two-dimensional lattice regularized directions.

Page 28: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

28

Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.

Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611

Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361

Hanada

JHEP 1011 (2010) 112

Supersymmetric regularized formulation on

(1) Taking continuum limit of

Full SUSY is recovered in the UV region

Theory on the

Page 29: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

29

Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.

Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611

Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361

Hanada

JHEP 1011 (2010) 112

Supersymmetric regularized formulation on

(1) Taking continuum limit of

Full SUSY is recovered in the UV region

Theory on the

(2) Moyal plane limit or commutative limit of .

Page 30: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

30

Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.

Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611

Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361

Hanada

JHEP 1011 (2010) 112

Supersymmetric regularized formulation on

(1) Taking continuum limit of

Full SUSY is recovered in the UV region

Theory on the

(2) Moyal plane limit or commutative limit of .

Bothering UV divergences are suppressed by fully recovered SUSY in the step (1)

Page 31: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

31

Non-perturbative formulation using anisotropy.

Hanada-Matsuura-SuginoProg.Theor.Phys. 126 (2012) 597-611

Nucl.Phys. B857 (2012) 335-361

Hanada

JHEP 1011 (2010) 112

Supersymmetric regularized formulation on

(1) Taking continuum limit of

Full SUSY is recovered in the UV region

Theory on the

(2) Moyal plane limit or commutative limit of .

Bothering UV divergences are suppressed by fully recovered SUSY in the step (1)

No fine-tunings !!

Page 32: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

32

Our work

Page 33: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

33

We construct the analogous model to

Hanada-Matsuura-Sugino

Advantages of our model: (1) Simpler and easier to put on a computer

(2) It can be embedded to the matrix model easily. (Because we use “deconstruction”)

Easy to utilize the numerical techniques

developed in earlier works.

Page 34: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

34

Moreover, we resolve the biggest disadvantage of the deconstruction approach of Kaplan et al.

In the approach, to make the well defined lattice theory from the matrix model, we need to introduce SUSY breaking moduli fixing terms, SUSY on the lattice is eventually broken (in IR, still helps to protect from UV divergences)

Page 35: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

35

Moreover, we resolve the biggest disadvantage of the deconstruction approach of Kaplan et al.

In the approach, to make the well defined lattice theory from the matrix model, we need to introduce SUSY breaking moduli fixing terms, SUSY on the lattice is eventually broken (in IR, still helps to protect from UV divergences)

We introduce a new moduli fixing term with preserving the SUSY on the lattice !!

Page 36: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

36

Our Formulation

Page 37: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

37

Outline of the way to construct.

Page 38: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

38

(0) Starting from the Mass deformed 1 dimensional matrix model with 8SUSY

(Analogous to BMN matrix model)

Orbifolding & deconstruction

(1) Orbifold lattice gauge theory on

4 SUSY is kept on the lattice (UV)And moduli fixing terms will

preserve 2 SUSY

Page 39: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

39

Momentum cut off

(2) Orbifold lattice gauge theory with momentum cut-off, (Hybrid regularization theory) Theory

on

Uplift to 4D by Fuzzy 2-sphere solution

Actually all of SUSY are broken but “harmless”

(3) Our non-perturbative formulation for 4D N=2 non-commutative SYM theories: Theory

on

Page 40: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

40

Detail of how to construct.

Page 41: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

41

(0) The Mass deformed 1 dimensional matrix model

With mN × mN matrices and with 8-SUSY

For later use, we will rewrite the model by complexified fields and decomposed spinor components.

Page 42: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

42

Page 43: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

43

We also pick up and focus on the specific 2 of 8 SUSY.

By using these 2 supercharges and spnior decomposition and complexified fields, we can rewrite the matrix model action by “the BTFT form”

Page 44: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

44

The transformation laws are

Page 45: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

45

The important property of

Global

generators

:doublets:triplet

If

Page 46: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

46

The model has

symmetry with following charge assignment

singlet

Charge is unchanged under the

Page 47: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

47

(1) Orbifold lattice gauge theory

Page 48: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

(1) Orbifold lattice gauge theoryOrbifold projection operator on fields with

r-charge

Page 49: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

49

(1) Orbifold lattice gauge theoryOrbifold projection operator on fields with

r-charge

Orbifold projection:Discarding the mN ×mN components except

the ones with

mN ×mN indices

Page 50: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

50

Under the projection, matrix model fields become lattice fields

Page 51: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory

SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice

Page 52: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

52

SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory

SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice

= # of site fermions

# of SUSY on the lattice = # of fermions with

Page 53: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

53

SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory

SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice

= # of site fermions

# of SUSY on the lattice = # of fermions with

Page 54: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

54

SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory

SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice

= # of site fermions

# of SUSY on the lattice = # of fermions with

4 fermions

Page 55: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

55

SUSY on the orbifold lattice theory

SUSY charges commuting with orbifold projection will be the SUSY on the lattice

= # of site fermions

# of SUSY on the lattice = # of fermions with

4 fermions

4SUSY is preserved on the lattice !!

Page 56: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

56

Deconstruction and continuum limit.

*Orbifodling is just picking up the subsector of matrix model. (No space has appeared.)*No kinetic terms.

Page 57: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

57

*Orbifodling is just picking up the subsector of matrix model. (No space has appeared.)*No kinetic terms.

To provide the kinetic term and continuum limit,

we expand the bosonic link fields around as

Deconstruction and continuum limit.

Page 58: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

58

Continuum limit.

*By taking *If fluctuation around is

small, We can obtain the mass deformed 2d SYM with

8SUSY at the continuum limit

Page 59: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

59

To provide the proper continuum limit, the fluctuation must be small enough compared with .

But in the SUSY gauge theory, there are flat directions which allows huge fluctuation.

We need to suppress the fluctuation by adding the moduli fixing terms

Moduli fixing terms.

These break the SUSY on the lattice eventually.

(Softly broken, so UV divergence will not be altered.)

Page 60: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

60

Proposed new Moduli fixing terms with keeping SUSYWe proposed a new moduli fixing

terms without breaking SUSY !!

Page 61: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

61

Proposed new Moduli fixing terms with keeping SUSYWe proposed a new moduli fixing

terms without breaking SUSY !!

We utilized the fact

61

If

Page 62: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

62

Orbifold lattice action for 2d mass deformed SYM with moduli fixing terms is

Page 63: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

63

Page 64: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

64

Page 65: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

65

(2) Momentum cut-off on the orbifold lattice theory.

Page 66: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

66

To perform the numerical simulation, Remaining one continuum direction also

must be regularized.

We employ the momentum cut-off regularization in Hanada-Nishimura-ShingoTakeuchi

Momentum cut-off is truncating the Fourier expansion in the finite-volume

Page 67: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

67

Momentum cut-off in gauge theory

To justify the momentum cut-off, we need to fix the gauge symmetry by the gauge fixing condition

These condition fix the large gauge transformation which allows the momentum to go beyond the cut-off.

Page 68: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

68

Momentum cut-off action on (Hybrid regularized theory) after

gauge fixing.

Page 69: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

69

And so on.. (Remaining parts are really boring, so I will omit the parts…)

Page 70: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

70

Notes:

(1) About the gauge fixing.

Page 71: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

71

Notes:

(1) About the gauge fixing.

Gauge fixing does not spoil the quantum computation based on the gauge symmetry, because it is just putting the BRS exact term to the action, which does not affect the computation of gauge invariant quantity.Rather we should take this fixing as being required to justify the momentum cut-off to be well defined.

Only for this purpose !!

Page 72: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

72

Notes:

(2) The cut-off might break the gauge symmetry, is it O.K ?

Page 73: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

73

Notes:

(2) The cut-off might break the gauge symmetry, is it O.K ?

O.K !

Page 74: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

74

Notes:

(2) The cut-off might break the gauge symmetry, is it O.K ?

O.K ! If the gauge symmetry is recovered only by taking, completely no

problem. I would like to emphasize that what we are

interested in is the theory at , not the theory with finite cut-off.

There is no concern whether the regularized theory break the gauge sym. or not, since it is just a regularization.

Page 75: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

75

Notes:

(2) The cut-off might break the gauge symmetry, is it O.K ?

O.K ! If the gauge symmetry is recovered only by taking, completely no

problem. I would like to emphasize that what we are

interested in is the theory at , not the theory with finite cut-off.

There is no concern whether the regularized theory break the gauge sym. or not, since it is just a regularization.

I will explain it later by including the quantum effects

Page 76: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

76

(3) Uplifting to 4d by Fuzzy 2-sphere solution

Page 77: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

77

Until here, the theory is still in the 2 dimensions.

We need to uplift the theory to 4 dimensions.

We will use the Fuzzy Sphere solutions!

Page 78: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

78

Until here, the theory is still in the 2 dimensions.

We need to uplift the theory to 4 dimensions.

We will use the Fuzzy Sphere solutions!

Derivative operators along fuzzy S2

Page 79: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

79

We expand the fields in the spherical harmonics:

Page 80: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

80

We expand the fields in the spherical harmonics:

field on 2d

spherical harmonics(kind of Fourier basis) on Fuzzy S2

field variable on target 4d space.

Page 81: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

81

We expand the fields in the spherical harmonics:

field on 2d

spherical harmonics(kind of Fourier basis) on Fuzzy S2

field variable on target 4d space.

Fuzzy Sphere solution does not break 8 SUSY at all !!

Page 82: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

82

By this uplifting, we have completed the construction of non-perturbative formulation for N=2 4d non-commutative SYM theories.

Page 83: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

83

How to take the target continuum theory

Page 84: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

84

In our formulation, 4-dimensions are divided into 3-parrts.

Regularized by momentum cut-off

sitesparamete

rs

Page 85: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

85

In our formulation, 4-dimensions are divided into 3-parrts.

Regularized by momentum cut-off

sitesparamete

rs

Task.

Which direction should we deal with first ?

Page 86: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

86

Criteria.

In early lower dimensional stage, it is easier to handle the crude regularization breaking much symmetries.

Page 87: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

87

Criteria.

In early lower dimensional stage, it is easier to handle the crude regularization breaking much symmetries.

We should undertake the crude regularization first !

Page 88: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

88

Regularized by momentum cut-off

sitesparamete

rs

誰是壞人?

Page 89: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

89

Regularized by momentum cut-off

sitesparamete

rs

就是你!!

You are so rude !!

Page 90: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

90

Regularized by momentum cut-off

sitesparamete

rs

On the other hand,

BPS state, SUSY is well protected.

Page 91: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

91

Then order of taking the limit becomes

Page 92: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

92

We start from momentum cut-off directions.

Page 93: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

93

In finite the theory is one-dimensional theory. There is no UV

divergences.

There is no quantum correction breaking 2 SUSY and gauge symmetry.

only by taking, orbifold lattice theory is recovered.

Page 94: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

94

We start from momentum cut-off directions.

Page 95: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

Repeating the renormalization discussion in the early stage of this talk….

Renormalization in the 2-dimensional case Let us consider the local operators

Mass dimensions

Quantum corrections of the operators are

Mass dimensions 2!

Super-renormalizable

Relevant or marginal operators show up only at 1-loop level.

Irrelevant

Page 96: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

Only following operator is relevant:

Relevant

No fermionic partner, prohibited by the SUSY on the

lattice At all order of perturbation, the

absence of the SUSY breaking quantum corrections are guaranteed, no fine-tuning.

Page 97: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

Only following operator is relevant:

Relevant

No fermionic partner, prohibited by the SUSY on the

lattice At all order of perturbation, the

absence of the SUSY breaking quantum corrections are guaranteed, no fine-tuning.

In this step, the full 8 SUSY is restored !!

Page 98: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

98

We start from momentum cut-off directions.

Page 99: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

99

In this step, since the full SUSY is preserved, we do not need to mind any quantum correction

Page 100: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

100

In this step, since the full SUSY is preserved, we do not need to mind any quantum correction

No fine-tuning !!

Page 101: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

101

Notes:

In the case of N=4 theory, we can continuously connect to the commutative theory in

Page 102: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

102

Notes:

In the case of N=4 theory, we can continuously connect to the commutative theory in

On the other hand, N=2 theory, it is expected not to be continuously connectted to the commutative theory in

Our theory is a non-perturbative formulation for the non-commutative gauge theory, but it is useful enough to investigate the non-perturbative aspects of gauge theories.

Page 103: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

103

SummarySummary

We provide a simple non-perturbative formulation for N=2 4-dimensional theories, which is easy to put on computer.

Page 104: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

104

Moreover, we resolve the biggest disadvantage of the deconstruction approach of Kaplan et al.

In the approach, to make the well defined lattice theory from the matrix model, we need to introduce SUSY breaking moduli fixing terms, SUSY on the lattice is eventually broken (in IR, still helps to protect from UV divergences)

Page 105: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

105

Anisotropic treatment is useful for controlling the UV divergences.

Page 106: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

106

End わんたんら

Page 107: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

107

Precise discussion

Page 108: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

108

Only following diagrams can provide quantum corrections

Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling

Page 109: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

109

Only following diagrams can provide quantum corrections

Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling

Page 110: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

110

Momentum integration of the odd function

Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling

Page 111: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

111

Momentum integration of the odd function

Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling

= 0

= 0

Page 112: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

112

Momentum integration of the odd function

Bosonic tadpole with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with fermionic loop

Bosonic 2-point function with bosonic loop and derivative coupling

= 0

= 0

No quantum correction !!

Page 113: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

113

Page 114: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

114

It becomes the theory on

Page 115: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

115

Page 116: Tomohisa Takimi   (TIFR)

116