Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

18
Metallurgy and Archaeology A case study on iron objects from the megalithic sites in Nagpur, India Jang-Sik Park Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Hongik University, Korea Vasant Shinde Deccan College, Post-Graduate & Research Institute, India ICTS Mini Workshop on Future Of the Past November 22-26, 2011, Gateway Hotel, Mangalore, India

Transcript of Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Page 1: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Metallurgy and Archaeology

A case study on iron objects

from the megalithic sites in Nagpur, India

Jang-Sik Park

Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Hongik University, Korea

Vasant Shinde

Deccan College, Post-Graduate & Research Institute, India

ICTS Mini Workshop on

Future Of the Past November 22-26, 2011, Gateway Hotel, Mangalore, India

Page 2: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Acknowledgement

The people of Deccan College are acknowledged for the hospitality

they showed to me and my wife when we visited Pune last summer

to take samples for examination.

We also appreciate Dr. James Lankton, the previous speaker, for his

crucial role in the initiation of this collaborative project.

The analytical part of this project was supported by the Korea National

Research Foundation (NRF-2010-0028714).

Page 3: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Why Metallurgy (Iron and bronze) in Archaeology?

Major engineering processes in Metallurgy

1. Smelting

2. Making of alloys

3. Fabrication

-shaping: casting and forging

-thermo-mechanical treatments: quenching, tempering, work-hardening, annealing

Page 4: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Individual engineering processes

-achieved in a number of different ways

depending on

technological and sociopolitical environments.

Combination of the individual processes

-lead to the establishment of

a unique technological tradition

reflecting temporal and regional characteristics.

Page 5: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Major assumption

Individual engineering processes &

their unique combination, i.e., technological traditions

can be traced through the application of

scientific methodologies developed in metallurgy,

for the better understanding of history.

Page 6: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Case study

Iron tradition of

the megalithic communities

at Nagpur, India

Page 7: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Iron metallurgy

1. Smelting -bloomery iron

-cast iron

2. Steelmaking -carburization (carbon added)

-decarburization (carbon removed)

3. Fabrication -shaping: casting and forging

-thermo-mechanical treatments: quenching, tempering,

work-hardening, annealing

Page 8: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

I. Smelting

Microstructure typical of the bloomery process Slag produced in iron smelting

Naikund, Nagpur AMS dated: approximately 5,000±42 yr BP

Page 9: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Bloomery process (low temperature reduction process)

-Low carbon iron (named bloomery or sponge iron) produced

at relatively low temperatures.

-Reaction occurring in a solid state without melting.

! One of the 2 major smelting processes practiced in antiquity.

!! Invented in the West or India.

Page 10: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

II. Steelmaking

-To adjust the carbon level of the smelted iron

for better functional properties.

-Carbon addition needed for bloomery iron

Page 11: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Dagger

from the megalithic site

at Mahurjhari

Optical micrograph showing the structure at the end of the tang at d

High C layer surrounding the low C interior

-Representative of the steelmaking by carburization

-Low carbon iron heated in a burning charcoal environment to raise carbon levels.

Page 12: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Plate-type object from the megalithic site at Khairwada

Forged out of almost pure iron and then the whole part carburized. Intermediary or currency?

Microstructure at the flank: b; Pure iron

Structure similar in a and c

Microstructure at the flank: b; High C steel

Structure similar in a and c

Page 13: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

III. Fabrication

-Shaping

-Thermal treatments for adjusting functional properties

1) Quenching for hardening

2) Tempering or annealing for reducing brittleness

Page 14: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Microstructure at the blade: a

High C steel

Microstructure at the rear: c

High C steel

Microstructure at the flank: b

Almost pure iron

Axe from the megalithic site at Khairwada: 7-B3-1

Shaping by forging

Steelmaking either by carburization or welding

Page 15: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Axe from the megalithic site at Mahurjhari: 18-D1-1

Microstructure at the blade: a

High C steel

Microstructure at the rear: c

High C steel

Microstructure at the flank: b

Low C iron

Shaping by forging

Steelmaking

Quenching and then tempering

Page 16: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Major factors

-Bloomery process in smelting

-Carburization in steelmaking

-Advanced thermal techniques practiced

Iron tradition of megalithic Nagpur characterized

Plate-type objects

-Intermediaries to be forged into critical parts

of various tools and weapons

-A means for trade (Value would depend on size

and carbon levels)

Iron tradition

-Standardized

-Efficient and versatile

-Fully developed

Page 17: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Topics of the future research

The existence of an advanced technology raising questions

-Origin,

-Development

-Diffusion

- Innovations made during the megalithic period?

- Inheritance from the previous native civilizations?

- Driven by foreign Influences?

Iron objects from the megalithic sites within the district of Nagpur

- Share a common iron tradition

- What about the other megalithic sites scattered over the

territory of the Indian subcontinent?

Another topic of significance to study

Evolution and diffusion of this particular iron tradition

in the subsequent generations within and without

the Indian subcontinent

Page 18: Metallurgy and Archaeology - TIFR

Concluding remarks

Our collaborative research is just beginning and many more iron and bronze objects from

collections with varying chronological and regional contexts must be subjected to a rigorous

scientific examination to reach a more general conclusion.

Nevertheless, the results presented above reveal important information that can hardly be

obtained without the integration of metallurgy and archaeology.

More importantly, this information stimulates numerous well-defined questions of substantial

significance to be generated, which may readily be solved in the future research for the better

understanding of the history of India and Korea and their probable interaction in the past.