SYSTEMS DESIGN November 2002 Fordham School of Law Scanlon.
-
Upload
madlyn-richards -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of SYSTEMS DESIGN November 2002 Fordham School of Law Scanlon.
SYSTEMS DESIGN
• November 2002
• Fordham School of Law
• Scanlon
VENUES
• PRIVATE CONTEXT– B2B
• Multi-Tiered or Multi-Step Dispute Resolution Clauses
– Employers/Employees Systems
– Business-Consumer Systems
• PUBLIC CONTEXT– Court-annexed Systems
– Implementation of Mass Claims Settlements
– Federal or State Employers/Employees
CHALLENGE
• “The task for parties who can reasonably anticipate a stream of disputes between them is to go beyond settling those disputes one at a time and to go beyond selecting one procedure to resolve all disputes. Their goal should be to design at comprehensive and effective dispute resolution system.” (Goldberg, Brett, and Ury)
PRIVATE CONTEXT
• Pre-dispute– Dispute Resolution Clauses: Multi-tiered or
Multi-Step
• Post-dispute– Toro example
MULTI-TIERED or MULTI-STEP CLAUSE
• Pre-dispute
• Features
• Usage
EXAMPLE OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES
• Prevention checks
• Interests-based focus - not rights-based
• “Loop-backs” to negotiation
• Low-cost adjudication backups
• Low-to-high cost sequence
• Provide necessary motivation, skills, resources and environment
BASIC BUILDING BLOCKS
• Step One: Negotiation
• Step Two A: Mediation
• Step Two B: “Loop-backs” - evaluative mediation, advisory opinions, ENE
• Step Three: Arbitration or Litigation
DESIGN SEQUENCE: ONE ROADMAP
• Identification of Objectives and Goals
• Identification of Participants – Design Committee? – Importance of involving “stakeholders” in
system
• Prevention Procedures– Notification and Consultation– Post-Dispute Analysis and Feedback
• Interest-Based Procedures– Negotiation– Mediation
• (valuable means to ensure that interests are thoroughly considered before a dispute turns into a lawsuit)
DESIGN SEQUENCE
• Loop-Back Procedures– Advisory Arbitration– Dispute Review Board
• construction - nonbinding, yet typically admissible in any subsequent dispute resolution proceeding
– Minitrial (for more significant disputes)– Summary Jury Trial (for more significant
disputes)– Cooling-Off Period
DESIGN SEQUENCE
• Low-Cost Back-Up Procedures– Arbitration (conventional, expedited, final
offer)
• “Marketing” of Design System– motivation, skills, resources
DESIGN SEQUENCE
• Increase in claims if system is designed?
• Sequence of Procedures (e.g., negotiation, mediation, arbitration) may undermine negotiation stage
• Buy-In
HIDDEN PITFALLS
DUE PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS
– Neutrals– Payment– Pre-dispute vs. post-dispute– Remedies– Notice– Others
• How to evaluate systems?
• Criteria
MONITORING
EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS
• Private
• Case law
• Recent statutory developments
PUBLIC CONTEXT
• Court Programs (e.g., Mandatory Mediation Programs)
• Mass Claims Settlements