Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

15
Adam Nowak Fatimah Muhammad Sandybel Quintana Lindsey Shobe

description

Final presentation project for my PYC 2020, Psychology Research Methods, class.

Transcript of Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

Page 1: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

Adam Nowak

Fatimah Muhammad

Sandybel Quintana

Lindsey Shobe

Page 2: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

• A common activity of everyday life is identifying and understanding written words whether it is in books, billboards, signs, clothing, or even card games.

• In a Stroop experiment, participants are asked to identify the color of a word.

• The words themselves are colors, e.g. red, purple, brown, and grey. However, the words are written in a different color, other than what the word itself says.

• The purpose is to study if there is a deviation between reaction times when the word and color match, a congruent condition, and when the word and color do not match, an incongruent condition.

Page 3: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

HYPOTHESES

PrimaryThe backwards incongruent condition would be the slowest reaction time.

SecondaryThe congruent condition would be the fastest reaction time.

Page 4: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

METHOD

Participants• Age: Young adults 18-25

• 19 participants (10 females)

Materials • Dell/75 Htz desktop

• 17inch LCD color monitor

• SPSS

• Keyboard strokes: r, g, y, b

Page 5: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

STIMULI

Backwards Congruent

Backwards Incongruent

Page 6: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

Sideways Congruent

Sideways Incongruent

Page 7: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

Congruent

Incongruent

Page 8: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

PROCEDURE

• Practice Trial Run

• Single- letter stimuli

• Real Trial

• 12 trials per condition

• All trials separated with a cue +++

• Conditions were counterbalanced

• Correct response: r, g, y, or b

Page 9: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

RESULTS

• A one-way repeated measure ANOVA was calculated comparing the reaction times and a significant effect was found:

[F(1,18)=259.12]

• Significant Results

Page 10: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint
Page 11: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

DISCUSSIONInternal Validity Issues• Stimuli were not completely randomized

• More room for carryover effect

• Three participants participated in similar research

Correlation to Research• Effects of dyslexia on Stroop performance

• Physiological inhibitors (parietal and frontal lobe lesions)

Page 12: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

PHYSIOLOGICAL REASONING

• Frontal lobe and the parietal lobe lesions interfere with reaction times

Page 13: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

NEXT STEPS• Screen for dyslexia

• Is language a distracter?

• Is the Stroop effect still present with a single-letter incongruency

Page 14: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

REFERENCES• Pujol, J., Vendrell, P., Deus, J., Junque, C., Bello, J., Mati-Vilata, J., Capdevila, A. (2001).

The effect of medial frontal and posterior parietal demyelinating lesions on Stroop interference. NeuroImage, 13, 68-75. Doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0662.

Page 15: Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint

QUESTIONS?