Planning Software June 2014 Summary Charts

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 1

Planning Software Study

Summary ChartsFebruary - June 2014


Agenda

Study Overview

Planning Software Overview

Planning Software Implementation

Team Alignment


Study Overview


Most Respondents Work for a Manufacturer;Company Revenue is $5B on Average


Over Two-Thirds of Manufacturers/RetailersWork in a Process Industry


Over Half of Respondents Are Director Level or Higher;62% Work in a Supply Chain Role


Agenda

Study Overview



Team Alignment


90% of Respondents Have Demand Planning Software;83% Have a Supply Planning Software


On Average, Respondents Report Having 3 Demand or 3 Supply Planning Instances


Respondents Have More Demand Planners Than Supply Planners on Average


Respondents with Higher Revenue Have MoreDemand/Supply Planners


There Is No Statistical Difference in Number of PlannersBased on Number of Items


Respondents Have an Average of 52K SKUs, 58 Distribution Centers and 46 Production Facilities


Agenda

Study Overview



Team Alignment


Respondents Were Split Into Groups Asked AboutEither Demand or Supply Planning Software


Planning Software Vendors Are Broken Into 3 Groups for Analysis: ERP Expansionist, Best of Breed and Other


Type of Vendor Is Consistent Across Demand and Supply Planning Instances Asked About


One-Third of Instances Were Implemented In-house; Implementation Took 14 Months on Average;

Nearly Half Were Early or On-Time


Over Half Were Under or On Budget;Companies Got Their ROI in 9 Months on Average


69% Are Satisfied with the Performance of Their Planning Instances Asked About


Satisfaction Is Higher for the Demand Planning Instances Asked About Compared to Supply


Satisfaction Is Higher for Best of Breed and Other Instances Overall


Satisfaction Is Higher for Those Planning Instances Implemented Faster


Satisfaction Is Higher for Those Planning InstancesImplemented Early or On-Time


Satisfaction Is Higher for Those Planning Instances Implemented Under or On Budget


Satisfaction Is Higher for Those Planning Instances Implemented by the Technology Provider


Satisfaction Is Not Impacted by Company Revenue


Supply Planning Instances Were Somewhat More LikelyThan Demand to be Implemented by the Technology Provider


Best of Breed and Other Instances Were More Likely to BeImplemented by the Technology Vendor


Time to Implement Was Less for Demand Than SupplyInstances Asked About


Time to Implement Was Less for Best of Breedand Other Vendor Types


Time to Implement Was Less When Implemented bythe Technology Vendor


Demand Instances Were More Likely Than Supply to BeImplemented Early or On-time


Instances from Other Vendors (Not ERP Expansionist or Best of Breed) Were Implemented Faster


There Is No Difference in Implementation Speed byHow It Was Implemented


Demand Instances Were More Likely to Be Under / On Budget Than Supply Instances


Instances from Best of Breed and Other Vendors Were More Likely to Be Implemented Under or On Budget


There Is No Difference in Implementation Cost Compared to Budget by How It Was Implemented


Instances That Were Early / On-Time Were More Likely to Be Implemented Under or On Budget


Demand Instances Get to ROI Somewhat Faster


Instances from Best of Breed and Other Vendors Were More Likely to Get to ROI Faster


There Are No Significant Differences in Time to ROIBased on How Software Was Implemented


Agenda

Study Overview



Team Alignment


Most Important and Highest Performing on Alignment:Sales & Marketing, Sales & Operations,

Manufacturing & Procurement


Greatest Gaps in Team Alignment:Sales & IT and Operations & IT


79% Say Their Demand and Supply Teams Are Aligned


Those with More Demand or Supply Planners Rate Demand-Supply Team Alignment as Higher

Planning Software June 2014 Summary Charts

Business

Transcript of Planning Software June 2014 Summary Charts