Master Checkpoint Report -...

CENTRE REPORT

Number of Students: 48 Centre Number: EG025 Date: May 2016

Number of Teaching Groups: 2 Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English

Performance in each sub-strandFor this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other areas.

Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was worse than expectedWt Text structure Performance was as expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was worse than expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was worse than expected

Un Sentence structure Performance was as expectedUp Punctuation Performance was as expectedUsage

Rx Explicit meaning Performance was as expectedRi Implicit meaning Performance was better than expectedRu Use of language Performance was as expected

Reading

Average Cambridge Checkpoint scores are as follows:

Usage Average score = 2.8

Writing Average score = 2.9

English (overall) Average score = 3.0

Reading Average score = 3.2

Explanation of the Cambridge Checkpoint Scale:

• Scores on the Cambridge Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level ofability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability).

• Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of mostof the curriculum content.

• Students achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculumcontent. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum.

• Students achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of thecurriculum content.

Note:

Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this page.

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 1 - Part 1 : Summary


Name of Teaching Group: E1 E1 Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


• Scores on the Cambridge Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level ofability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability)


• Student achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculumcontent. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum.

• Student achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of thecurriculum content.

Note:


Average Cambridge Checkpoint scores for this teaching group are as follows:





Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was as expectedWt Text structure Performance was as expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was as expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was as expected



Reading

For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other areas.

Performance in each sub-strand

6260 MALAK HUSSIEN EID EL BAMBY 2.6 2.0 2.8 2.8

6251 ADAM AHMED OSAMA TAWFIK 1.5 3.3 0.5 1.1

6255 FARIDA AMR TAWFIK SHERIF 4.9 6.0 4.2 4.4

6252 AHMED RAMY BASSIOUNY 2.5 2.8 2.2 2.5

6253 CARMEN COLIN MOUGHTIN LANCASTER 5.0 4.4 5.5 5.2

6256 IBRAHIM MOHAMED ABO SAADA 3.1 3.3 3.9 1.8

6259 JUDY SHERIF FAROUK HAMED EL DIASTY 3.9 3.5 4.2 4.1

6254 FARAH EL-MOTAZ BELLAH OMAR EL GIBALI 2.9 3.5 2.6 2.5

6257 ISMAIL AHMED AHMED EL-ETREIBY 1.5 1.1 1.1 2.3

6258 ISMAIL AHMED WAFAIE MOSTAFA 4.6 5.2 4.7 3.8

Class Average 3.1 3.4 3.0 3.0

Student No. Student Name English Reading Usage Writing

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 1 - Part 2 : List of Students' Results



Table of Students' Results


Results (Cambridge Checkpoint scores)

6268 NOUR HESHAM FOULY MOUSTAFA ABDELGAWAD 4.4 4.9 3.7 4.8

6269 OMAR MOHAMED KOTB 2.5 3.1 2.0 2.5

6270 OMAR MOHAMED SAEED 1.9 2.6 1.8 1.6

6263 MAZEN SALEM HASSAN ELANWAR 2.5 4.2 1.1 2.3

6264 MOHAMED OSAMA MOHAMED BAHI ELDEEN AHMED 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.3

6261 MALAK IHAB ELLEITHY 3.4 4.2 2.8 3.1

6262 MARIAM MOHAMED MOHAMED NOUR MOHAMED ABDEL MOTALEB

4.2 4.4 4.4 3.8

6266 MOSTAFA MOHAMED NADER ABDRABOU EL HELALY 0.6 0.0 0.7 0.9

6265 MOHAMED SALAH ALMAHDY 3.4 2.3 3.9 4.1

6267 NEZAR SAMEH TALAAT 3.5 4.0 3.7 2.5









6271 SAMA EHAB FAWZY AKL IBRAHIM 3.6 3.3 3.5 4.1

6273 YASSIN MOHAMED ABO SAADA 3.8 4.4 3.3 3.8

6274 YASSIN HATEM GAMAL ELSAYED AMER 2.4 3.3 2.2 1.8

6272 SEIF EL-DIN OSAMA MOHAMED EL KHOLY 3.8 3.1 4.7 3.8

6275 YEHYA MOHAMED HASSAN MOHAMED NOUR 2.5 3.3 2.2 2.0









333444001001002012222323100211000106264 22 26 48 2.5

434445003000000112555611000201001106265 30 29 59 3.4

335445003101022113444434111200010116262 34 35 69 4.2

334445003102200114555644111211011116253 44 33 77 5.0

223233002101011113444423101200001106254 30 23 53 2.9

444446103112222112344444111201001116255 34 42 76 4.9

223233002111022002223334000100011116263 24 24 48 2.5

212121102011020011323313001100001006251 19 17 36 1.5

233333110100000013344513000100001116252 27 21 48 2.5

334445200101011013444533111200011116259 35 30 65 3.9

333445002100002002344400100100010116260 22 27 49 2.6

333344002011022113334334111100000116261 29 30 59 3.4

435433002101002113433312100200010116256 25 30 55 3.1

131223000001000004334423000000000006257 23 13 36 1.5

443443103111022113455534101211001116258 38 35 73 4.6

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 1 - Part 3 : Marks scored on each question

Table of marks scored by each Student on each question




44555722312222211457774411121111111

svpntcuuuiiiiiiiispntacxnnnpvvvvxxx

UUUUWWRRRRRRRRRRRUUUWWWRUUUUUUUURRR

ii

iviivii

vviiiibababaviiiibadcbacba

99999988766543211888887765432222111

22222222222222222111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100

P1 P2 Test Chkpt

333344002011000113455533001200101116271 35 26 61 3.6

222223000100022112333333111110010116275 28 20 48 2.5

444445102010020114445422110210000106272 31 33 64 3.8

222223000101002112333323111100111116274 28 19 47 2.4

224445011102022112334433101211011116273 32 32 64 3.8

221221000000000002333300000000000016266 15 10 25 0.6

223323101101000112234301010200000116270 20 21 41 1.9

443435002101122113444313101100000106267 26 34 60 3.5

222234002110002002434413101100010116269 27 21 48 2.5

234446003102222113355533101201000116268 34 37 71 4.4






44555722312222211457774411121111111



ii

iviivii


99999988766543211888887765432222111

22222222222222222111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100

P1 P2 Test Chkpt

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 2 - Part 1 : Summary




• Scores on the Cambridge Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level ofability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability)


• Student achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculumcontent. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum.

• Student achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of thecurriculum content.

Note:


Average Cambridge Checkpoint scores for this teaching group are as follows:





Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was worse than expectedWt Text structure Performance was as expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was as expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was as expected



Reading

For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other areas.

Performance in each sub-strand

6285 MAISSA MOHAMED ABDELMONEIM ALI HASSABALLA 3.4 2.8 3.5 4.1

6276 AHMED HOSSAM ELDIN AHMED EL SANHORY 3.5 2.0 4.2 4.4

6280 BELAL AHMED ABDELHASSIB 2.0 2.0 1.6 2.5

6277 ANAS AHMED OMAR MOHAMED 3.2 3.7 3.5 2.3

6278 ARWA YASSER MOHAMED NASR MOHAMED OMAR 3.1 4.4 1.8 3.1

6281 HABIBA SHERIF AHMED KHAIRY ABDALLA NOAMAN 2.9 1.7 3.7 3.1

6284 LAILA AMR MEDHAT MOSTAFA THABET 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.4

6279 BASSEL KHALED AHMED SAMY NEGM 1.9 2.0 1.6 2.3

6282 HUSSEIN MOHAMED KAMEL ABDEL RAOF SHABANA 2.5 3.5 2.0 2.0

6283 KARIM TAREK MOHAMED SALAH ELDIN KOTB 3.7 3.7 4.4 2.8









6294 SALMA HOSSAM ELDIN ALY MAHMOUD YASSIN 2.4 2.8 2.2 2.3

6292 OMAR WALID MOHAMED NABIL ABOULELA 2.9 2.3 2.8 3.8

6296 SHAMS SAMIR ABDELRAHMAN EL BABLY 1.8 2.6 1.6 1.6

6295 SAMY ASSAD SAMY ASSAD 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.8

6288 MOHAMED OSAMA TAWFIK 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.5

6286 MARVENA MAGDY KHALIL YASSA 3.0 5.6 2.0 1.6

6287 MOHAMED HAZEM SHOMER 0.7 2.0 0.1 0.4

6291 OMAR AYMAN MAHMOUD SEDKY EL TOHAMY 3.6 3.7 3.9 2.8

6290 OMAR AHMED NABIL EL MAZNY 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.8

6289 NADINE MAHMOUD BAYUMI MAHMOUD MOHAMED 2.9 3.5 2.4 2.8









6298 YOUSSEF WISSAM ARMIA BALAMOUN 3.5 4.4 3.5 2.3

6299 ZEINA MOHAMED TAHA AHMED ABDELRAHMAN OSMAN 4.2 4.2 3.7 4.8

6297 YOUSSEF MOHAMED ZAKARIA AHMED 1.8 1.4 1.8 2.3









334455001111021112333433111200000016290 27 33 60 3.5

322224002110002112345423110201000116289 30 23 53 2.9

223444000000020112233323010210101116288 26 23 49 2.6

323233103120222112332134100200000116286 23 31 54 3.0

332345203111002112233423000200000116278 23 32 55 3.1

223334002101000002333320000100001116279 20 21 41 1.9

334333001001202113333334111200100116277 30 27 57 3.2

211121001000100012212203100100000106287 15 11 26 0.7

335445000000000113445533111200001106276 34 26 60 3.5

223334000000012111334321000200000016280 20 22 42 2.0

333345001100002111355503101200001116284 29 27 56 3.1

334446000010000113444434100110001116285 32 27 59 3.4

334334002002102113354423111210110116283 34 29 63 3.7

334334000111000004434522001211000016281 30 23 53 2.9

231344001012001112323213100110111116282 24 24 48 2.5






44555722312222211457774411121111111



ii

iviivii


99999988766543211888887765432222111

22222222222222222111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100

P1 P2 Test Chkpt

222233101111000012323212100200010106296 20 20 40 1.8

334345002111022003345544011211001116299 37 31 68 4.2

223331001111022113454434111101011116298 36 24 60 3.5

222123000110000003434512100200000016297 26 14 40 1.8

334343002012201113344422101211010116291 31 30 61 3.6

324344002010000003333333010200001116295 27 23 50 2.7

323322000000022002335423100011001116294 28 19 47 2.4

333234000100000013435533011200001116292 33 20 53 2.9






44555722312222211457774411121111111



ii

iviivii


99999988766543211888887765432222111

22222222222222222111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100

P1 P2 Test Chkpt

STATEMENT OF ACHIEVEMENT

Student Number: 6251 Centre Name: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Centre Number: EG025

ADAM AHMED OSAMA TAWFIK

Cambridge Checkpoint Score: 1.5

Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.5

Writing 1.1

Reading 3.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Checkpoint tests.

Student Number: 6251 Centre Number: EG025 Date: May 2016

Student Name: ADAM AHMED OSAMA TAWFIK Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English

To be given to the student with the Statement of Achievement

REPORT TO STUDENT

Your Cambridge Checkpoint results are as follows:

Usage score = 0.5

Writing score = 1.1

English (Overall) score = 1.5

Reading score = 3.3

This is what the scores mean:

Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

What you got right and what you got wrong

Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Checkpoint score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work harder at.

Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult

7 Reading Use of language 2

4 Usage Sentence structure 1

8b Reading Use of language 2

3 Reading Implicit meaning 2

Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper

Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy

9v Usage Vocabulary 2

8v Usage Spelling 1

9iii Usage Sentence structure 2

1a Reading Explicit meaning 1




AHMED RAMY BASSIOUNY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 2.5

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED RAMY BASSIOUNY Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 2.5


Reading score = 2.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -




1a Reading Implicit meaning 2

1c Reading Explicit meaning 1


8a Reading Use of language 2




7b Writing Content 1






CARMEN COLIN MOUGHTIN LANCASTER


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 5.5

Writing 5.2

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: CARMEN COLIN MOUGHTIN LANCASTER

Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 5.5

Writing score = 5.2


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -




2d Usage Vocabulary 1



8iv Usage Punctuation 1










FARAH EL-MOTAZ BELLAH OMAR EL GIBALI


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.6

Writing 2.5

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: FARAH EL-MOTAZ BELLAH OMAR EL GIBALI



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.6

Writing score = 2.5


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -





3 Usage Punctuation 1


1b Reading Implicit meaning 2






9vi Usage Spelling 2




FARIDA AMR TAWFIK SHERIF


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.2

Writing 4.4

Reading 6.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: FARIDA AMR TAWFIK SHERIF Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.2

Writing score = 4.4


Reading score = 6.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -










8v Usage Spelling 1

2a Usage Vocabulary 1


8i Writing Purpose and audience 1




IBRAHIM MOHAMED ABO SAADA


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.9

Writing 1.8

Reading 3.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: IBRAHIM MOHAMED ABO SAADA Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.9

Writing score = 1.8


Reading score = 3.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -












8ii Writing Text structure 1





ISMAIL AHMED AHMED EL-ETREIBY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.1

Writing 2.3

Reading 1.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ISMAIL AHMED AHMED EL-ETREIBY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.1

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 1.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -







8v Usage Spelling 1










ISMAIL AHMED WAFAIE MOSTAFA


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.7

Writing 3.8

Reading 5.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ISMAIL AHMED WAFAIE MOSTAFA Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.7

Writing score = 3.8


Reading score = 5.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -










9i Writing Content 2







JUDY SHERIF FAROUK HAMED EL DIASTY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.2

Writing 4.1

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: JUDY SHERIF FAROUK HAMED EL DIASTY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.2

Writing score = 4.1


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -











2c Usage Vocabulary 1






MALAK HUSSIEN EID EL BAMBY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 2.8

Reading 2.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MALAK HUSSIEN EID EL BAMBY Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 2.8


Reading score = 2.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -













8v Usage Spelling 1




MALAK IHAB ELLEITHY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 3.1

Reading 4.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MALAK IHAB ELLEITHY Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 3.1


Reading score = 4.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MARIAM MOHAMED MOHAMED NOUR MOHAMED ABDEL MOTALEB


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.4

Writing 3.8

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MARIAM MOHAMED MOHAMED NOUR MOHAMED ABDEL MOTALEB



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.4

Writing score = 3.8


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MAZEN SALEM HASSAN ELANWAR


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.1

Writing 2.3

Reading 4.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MAZEN SALEM HASSAN ELANWAR Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.1

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 4.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOHAMED OSAMA MOHAMED BAHI ELDEEN AHMED


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.6

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED OSAMA MOHAMED BAHI ELDEEN AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.6

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOHAMED SALAH ALMAHDY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.9

Writing 4.1

Reading 2.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED SALAH ALMAHDY Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.9

Writing score = 4.1


Reading score = 2.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOSTAFA MOHAMED NADER ABDRABOU EL HELALY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.7

Writing 0.9

Reading 0.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOSTAFA MOHAMED NADER ABDRABOU EL HELALY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.7

Writing score = 0.9


Reading score = 0.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -













1b Reading Explicit meaning 1




NEZAR SAMEH TALAAT


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.7

Writing 2.5

Reading 4.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NEZAR SAMEH TALAAT Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.7

Writing score = 2.5


Reading score = 4.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















NOUR HESHAM FOULY MOUSTAFA ABDELGAWAD


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.7

Writing 4.8

Reading 4.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NOUR HESHAM FOULY MOUSTAFA ABDELGAWAD



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.7

Writing score = 4.8


Reading score = 4.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OMAR MOHAMED KOTB


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.0

Writing 2.5

Reading 3.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMAR MOHAMED KOTB Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.0

Writing score = 2.5


Reading score = 3.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OMAR MOHAMED SAEED


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.8

Writing 1.6

Reading 2.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMAR MOHAMED SAEED Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.8

Writing score = 1.6


Reading score = 2.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SAMA EHAB FAWZY AKL IBRAHIM


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 4.1

Reading 3.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SAMA EHAB FAWZY AKL IBRAHIM Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 4.1


Reading score = 3.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -







2b Usage Vocabulary 1










SEIF EL-DIN OSAMA MOHAMED EL KHOLY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.7

Writing 3.8

Reading 3.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SEIF EL-DIN OSAMA MOHAMED EL KHOLY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.7

Writing score = 3.8


Reading score = 3.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















YASSIN MOHAMED ABO SAADA


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 3.8

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YASSIN MOHAMED ABO SAADA Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 3.8


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -







8a Reading Use of language 2



8v Usage Spelling 1







YASSIN HATEM GAMAL ELSAYED AMER


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 1.8

Reading 3.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YASSIN HATEM GAMAL ELSAYED AMER



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 1.8


Reading score = 3.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















YEHYA MOHAMED HASSAN MOHAMED NOUR


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 2.0

Reading 3.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YEHYA MOHAMED HASSAN MOHAMED NOUR



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 2.0


Reading score = 3.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AHMED HOSSAM ELDIN AHMED EL SANHORY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.2

Writing 4.4

Reading 2.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED HOSSAM ELDIN AHMED EL SANHORY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.2

Writing score = 4.4


Reading score = 2.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ANAS AHMED OMAR MOHAMED


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 2.3

Reading 3.7

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ANAS AHMED OMAR MOHAMED Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 3.7


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ARWA YASSER MOHAMED NASR MOHAMED OMAR


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.8

Writing 3.1

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ARWA YASSER MOHAMED NASR MOHAMED OMAR



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.8

Writing score = 3.1


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -













8v Usage Spelling 1




BASSEL KHALED AHMED SAMY NEGM


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.6

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: BASSEL KHALED AHMED SAMY NEGM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.6

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















BELAL AHMED ABDELHASSIB


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.6

Writing 2.5

Reading 2.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: BELAL AHMED ABDELHASSIB Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.6

Writing score = 2.5


Reading score = 2.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -










8v Usage Spelling 1







HABIBA SHERIF AHMED KHAIRY ABDALLA NOAMAN


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.7

Writing 3.1

Reading 1.7

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: HABIBA SHERIF AHMED KHAIRY ABDALLA NOAMAN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.7

Writing score = 3.1


Reading score = 1.7


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -






8v Usage Spelling 1











HUSSEIN MOHAMED KAMEL ABDEL RAOF SHABANA


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.0

Writing 2.0

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: HUSSEIN MOHAMED KAMEL ABDEL RAOF SHABANA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.0

Writing score = 2.0


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















KARIM TAREK MOHAMED SALAH ELDIN KOTB


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.4

Writing 2.8

Reading 3.7

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: KARIM TAREK MOHAMED SALAH ELDIN KOTB



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.4

Writing score = 2.8


Reading score = 3.7


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















LAILA AMR MEDHAT MOSTAFA THABET


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 3.4

Reading 3.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: LAILA AMR MEDHAT MOSTAFA THABET



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 3.4


Reading score = 3.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -











8v Usage Spelling 1






MAISSA MOHAMED ABDELMONEIM ALI HASSABALLA


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 4.1

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MAISSA MOHAMED ABDELMONEIM ALI HASSABALLA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 4.1


Reading score = 2.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MARVENA MAGDY KHALIL YASSA


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.0

Writing 1.6

Reading 5.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MARVENA MAGDY KHALIL YASSA Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.0

Writing score = 1.6


Reading score = 5.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -













8v Usage Spelling 1




MOHAMED HAZEM SHOMER


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.1

Writing 0.4

Reading 2.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED HAZEM SHOMER Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.1

Writing score = 0.4


Reading score = 2.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOHAMED OSAMA TAWFIK


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.4

Writing 2.5

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED OSAMA TAWFIK Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.4

Writing score = 2.5


Reading score = 2.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















NADINE MAHMOUD BAYUMI MAHMOUD MOHAMED


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.4

Writing 2.8

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NADINE MAHMOUD BAYUMI MAHMOUD MOHAMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.4

Writing score = 2.8


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -













8v Usage Spelling 1




OMAR AHMED NABIL EL MAZNY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 3.8

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMAR AHMED NABIL EL MAZNY Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 3.8


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -











8v Usage Spelling 1






OMAR AYMAN MAHMOUD SEDKY EL TOHAMY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.9

Writing 2.8

Reading 3.7

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMAR AYMAN MAHMOUD SEDKY EL TOHAMY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.9

Writing score = 2.8


Reading score = 3.7


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OMAR WALID MOHAMED NABIL ABOULELA


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 3.8

Reading 2.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMAR WALID MOHAMED NABIL ABOULELA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 3.8


Reading score = 2.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SALMA HOSSAM ELDIN ALY MAHMOUD YASSIN


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SALMA HOSSAM ELDIN ALY MAHMOUD YASSIN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SAMY ASSAD SAMY ASSAD


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.6

Writing 2.8

Reading 2.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SAMY ASSAD SAMY ASSAD Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.6

Writing score = 2.8


Reading score = 2.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SHAMS SAMIR ABDELRAHMAN EL BABLY


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.6

Writing 1.6

Reading 2.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SHAMS SAMIR ABDELRAHMAN EL BABLY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.6

Writing score = 1.6


Reading score = 2.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















YOUSSEF MOHAMED ZAKARIA AHMED


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.8

Writing 2.3

Reading 1.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YOUSSEF MOHAMED ZAKARIA AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.8

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 1.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















YOUSSEF WISSAM ARMIA BALAMOUN


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 2.3

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YOUSSEF WISSAM ARMIA BALAMOUN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ZEINA MOHAMED TAHA AHMED ABDELRAHMAN OSMAN


Date: May 2016

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.7

Writing 4.8

Reading 4.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ZEINA MOHAMED TAHA AHMED ABDELRAHMAN OSMAN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.7

Writing score = 4.8


Reading score = 4.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -















Master Checkpoint Report -...

Documents

Transcript of Master Checkpoint Report -...