IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

29
Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. PX-19-77 YAKOV COHEN a/k/a "Jay Collins," a/k/a "Kobi Cohen," YOSEF HERZOG a/k/a "Yossi Herzog," ORI MAYMON a/k/a "Or Maymon," a/k/a "Patrick Accardo," NISSIM ALFASI a/k/a "Nick Onasis," ELAD BIGELMAN a/k/a "Michael Goldberg," RUNAL JEEBUN a/k/a "Ryan Jeebun," SABRINA ELOFER a/k/a "Mila Morales," AFIK TORI a/k/a "Kevin White," a/k/a "Harvey Stone," ANOG MAAREK a/k/a "Daniel Buckley," a/k/a "Daniel Marek," a/k/a "Hanog Dany Maarek," ORON MONTGOMERY a/k/a "Bill Shnizer," DAVID BARZILAY a/k/a "Dave Simpson," GILAD MAZUGI a/k/a "Gilad Mazugy," a/k/a "Adam Bloom," a/k/a "Adam Morgan," HADAS BEN HAIM a/k/a "Jessica Giovanie," YOUSEF BISHARA a/k/a "Yossef Bshara," a/k/a "Omar Alamin," a/k/a "Omar Abdullah," and NIREREZ a/k/a "Jack Cohen," (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349; Wire Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343; Aiding and Abetting, 18 U.S.C. § 2; Forfeiture, 28 U.S.C. § 2461, 18 U.S.C. §981,21 U.S.C. §853) Defendants

Transcript of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Page 1: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 1 of 29

IN T H E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T H E DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CRIMINAL NO. PX-19-77

YAKOV COHEN a/k/a "Jay Collins," a/k/a "Kobi Cohen,"

Y O S E F H E R Z O G a/k/a "Yossi Herzog,"

ORI MAYMON a/k/a "Or Maymon," a/k/a "Patrick Accardo,"

NISSIM A L F A S I a/k/a "Nick Onasis,"

E L A D BIGELMAN a/k/a "Michael Goldberg,"

RUNAL J E E B U N a/k/a "Ryan Jeebun,"

SABRINA E L O F E R a/k/a "Mila Morales,"

A F I K T O R I a/k/a "Kevin White," a/k/a "Harvey Stone,"

ANOG M A A R E K a/k/a "Daniel Buckley," a/k/a "Daniel Marek," a/k/a "Hanog Dany Maarek,"

ORON MONTGOMERY a/k/a "Bill Shnizer,"

DAVID B A R Z I L A Y a/k/a "Dave Simpson,"

G I L A D MAZUGI a/k/a "Gilad Mazugy," a/k/a "Adam Bloom," a/k/a "Adam Morgan,"

HADAS BEN HAIM a/k/a "Jessica Giovanie,"

Y O U S E F BISHARA a/k/a "Yossef Bshara," a/k/a "Omar Alamin," a/k/a "Omar Abdullah," and

N I R E R E Z a/k/a "Jack Cohen,"

(Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349; Wire Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343; Aiding and Abetting, 18 U.S.C. § 2; Forfeiture, 28 U.S.C. § 2461, 18 U.S.C. §981,21 U.S.C. §853)

Defendants

Page 2: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 2 of 29

FIRST SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland charges that at times material to this

Indictment:

G E N E R A L A L L E G A T I O N S Binary Options

1. A binary option was a type of option contract in which the payout depended on the

outcome of a discrete event, typically related to whether the price of a particular asset—such as a

stock or a commodity—would rise above or fall below a specified amount. Unlike standard

options, investors in binary options were not being given the opportunity to actually purchase a

stock or a commodity but, rather, were effectively predicting whether its price would be above or

below a certain amount at a certain time of the day. The option holder was typically promised that

when the binary option expired, the option holder would receive either a pre-determined amount

of cash or nothing.

Relevant Entities

2. BinaryBook and BigOption were "brands'* that sold and marketed binary options

to customers located throughout the world, including in the United States and within the District

of Maryland.

3. As described below, the BinaryBook and Big Option brands were operated through

a group of related entities including Linkopia (Mauritius) Ltd. ("Linkopia"), Yukom

Communications {"Yukom"), Numaris Communications Ltd. (uNumaris"), and other related

entities (collectively "the Binary Options Organization'').

4. Linkopia was a Mauritius-based business that provided sales and marketing

services, including "conversion services,"' on behalf of BinaryBook and BigOption through the use

of communications by email and by telephone to individuals in the United States, including in the

District of Maryland, and elsewhere throughout the world.

2

Page 3: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 3 of 29

a. "Conversion services" were services provided with, the objective of

converting a prospective binary options customer into an investor and obtaining an initial

deposit of funds.

b. A "conversion agent" or "conversion representative" was a salesperson

responsible for performing conversion services.

5. Yukom was a business based in Caesarea, Israel that provided sales and marketing

services, including "retention services," on behalf of BinaryBook and BigOption through the use

of communications by email and by telephone to individuals in the United States, including in the

District of Maryland, and elsewhere throughout the world.

a. "Retention services" were services provided with the objective of obtaining

additional deposits from investors who had previously made deposits and preventing those

investors from withdrawing their money.

b. A "retention agent" or "retention representative" was a salesperson

responsible for performing retention services.

c. Retention representatives sometimes referred to themselves as "brokers" or

"traders" to potential investors.

6. Numaris was a business based in Tel Aviv, Israel that provided sales and marketing

services, including "retention services," on behalf of BinaryBook through the use of

communications by email and by telephone to individuals in the United States, including in the

District of Maryland, and elsewhere throughout the world.

Other Relevant Definitions

7. A "bonus" was an amount of purported funds that representatives of BinaryBook

and BigOption could contribute to an investor's account to be used in trading. "Bonuses" were

often accompanied by burdensome "turnover" requirements—such as requiring that investors

3

Page 4: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 4 of 29

trade 30 times the amount in their accounts before they could withdraw funds—but investors were

more likely to lose their money over time as they increased their trading activity.

8. "Risk-free" or "insured" trades were represented to investors as trades for which

investors would be reimbursed for any losses. Investors were often not informed that the

reimbursed funds would be in the form of a bonus or about the associated burdensome turnover

requirements.

9. A "chargeback1' was the reversal of a credit card charge due to an allegation of

fraud by the cardholder.

10. A "payment service provider' was a third-party company that processed investor

deposits or payments.

The Defendants

11. Defendant Y A K O V COHEN, a/k/a "Jay Collins" a/k/a "Kobi Cohen," was a

resident of Mauritius. From at least in or about May 2014 through at least in or about September

2017. COHEN was a principal of the Binary Options Organization, and had an ownership interest

in entities within the Binary Options Organization. COHEN supervised the managers of Yukom,

Linkopia, BigOption. and BinaryBook. including Defendants MAYMON, A L F A S I ,

BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and others. In correspondence and other communications, COHEN

identified himself as responsible for "'Business Development" for BinaryBook and BigOption.

COHEN also participated in the selection of marketing campaigns through so-called "affiliate

marketers" that were used to solicit and target prospective investors for conversion.

12. Defendant Y O S E F HERZOG, a/k/a "Yossi Herzog," was a resident of Israel.

From at least in or about May 2014 through at least in or about September 2017, H E R Z O G was

a principal of the Binary Options Organization, and had an ownership interest in entities within

the Binary Options Organization. HERZOG supervised the managers of Yukom, Linkopia,

4

Page 5: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 5 of 29

BigOption, and BinaryBook. including MAYMON, ALFASI . BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and

others.

13. Defendant ORI MAYMON, a/k/a "Or Maymon" a/k/a "Patrick Accardo," was a

resident of Israel. From at least in or about June 2014 through at least in or about September 2017.

MAYMON was a retention representative and eventually a manager at Yukom. In

correspondence and other communications, MAYMON identified himself as "Head Broker and

V.I.P Account Manager' for BigOption. MAYMON supervised Yukom retention agents and also

performed retention services.

14. Defendant NISSIM ALFASI , a/k/a "Nick Onasis." was a resident of Israel. From

at least in or about July 2014 through at least in or about February 2017, A L F A S I was an employee

of Yukom, where he worked as a brand manager for BinaryBook. In correspondence and other

communications, ALFASI identified himself as "Branch Manager" for BinaryBook and "Account

Manager and Senior Broker" for BigOption. ALFASI supervised Yukom employees who worked

as BinaryBook retention agents. A L F A S I also perfonned retention services.

15. Defendant E L A D BIGELMAN, a/k/a "Michael Goldberg," was a resident of

Israel. From at least in or about January 2015 through at least in or about September 2017,

BIGELMAN was an employee of Yukom, where he worked as a brand manager for BigOption.

In correspondence and other communications, BIGELMAN identified himself as "Account

Manager" for BigOption. BIGELMAN supervised Yukom employees who worked as BigOption

retention agents. BIGELMAN also performed retention services on behalf of BigOption.

16. Defendant RUNAL JEEBUN, a/k/a "Ryan Jeebun," was a resident of Mauritius.

From at least in or about May 2014 through at least in or about December 2016, JEEBUN was an

employee at Yukom and worked as head of the customer service and internal investigation

5

Page 6: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 6 of 29

departments for BinaryBook and BigOption. In correspondence and other communications.

JEEBUN identified himself as a "Customer Support Representative" for BinaryBook and

"Linkopia Branch Manager." JEEBUN supervised representatives of BinaryBook and BigOption

who performed conversion and retention services on behalf of BinaryBook and BigOption.

J E E B U N also supervised the "Finance Department," which determined whether to permit

investors to withdraw their funds.

17. Defendant SABRINA E L O F E R , a/k/a "Mila Morales," was a resident of Israel.

From at least in or about October 2015 through at least in or about November 2016, E L O F E R

was an employee at Yukom who worked as a retention agent representing BinaryBook.

18. Defendant A F I K T O R I , a/k/a "Kevin White" a/k/a "Harvey Stone," was a resident

of Israel. From at least in or about August 2014 through at least in or about May 2017. T O R I was

an employee at Yukom who worked as a retention agent representing BigOption and BinaryBook.

19. Defendant ANOG MAAREK, a/k/a "Daniel Buckley" a/k/a "Daniel Marek" a/k/a

"Hanog Dairy Maarek," was a resident of Israel. From at least in or about January 2015 through

at least in or about June 2016. MAAREK was an employee at Yukom who worked as a retention

agent representing BinaryBook and BigOption.

20. Defendant ORON MONTGOMERY, a/k/a "Bi l l Shnizer." was a resident of

Israel. From at least in or about October 2014 through at least in or about July 2016,

MONTGOMERY was an employee at Yukom who worked as a retention agent representing

BinaryBook and BigOption.

21. Defendant DAVID BARZILAY, a/k/a "Dave Simpson," was a resident of Israel.

From at least in or about December 2014 through at least in or about March 2017, B A R Z I L A Y

6

Page 7: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 7 of 29

was an employee at Yukom who worked as a retention agent representing BinaryBook and

BigOption, and as a shift manager inside the Yukom offices in Caesarea.

22. Defendant G1LAD MAZUGI, a/k/a "Adam Bloom" a/k/a "Adam Morgan," was a

resident of Israel. From at least in or about May 2014 through at least in or about September 2017,

MAZUGI was an employee at Yukom who worked as a retention agent representing BinaryBook

and BigOption.

23. Defendant HADAS BEN HAIM, a/k/a "Jessica Giovanie," was a resident of Israel.

From at least in or about October 2014 through at least in or about August 2016, BEN HAIM was

an employee at Yukom who worked as a retention agent representing BinaryBook and BigOption.

24. Defendant YOUSEF BISHARA, a/k/a Yossef Bshara a/k/a "Omar Alamin" a/k/a

"Omar Abdullah," was a resident of Israel. From at least in or about October 2014 through at least

in or about March 2017, BISHARA was an employee at Yukom who worked as a retention agent

representing BinaryBook and BigOption.

25. Defendant NIR E R E Z , a/k/a "Jack Cohen," was a resident of Israel. From at least

in or about April 2015 through at least in or about August 2016, E R E Z was an employee at Yukom

who worked as a retention agent representing BinaryBook and BigOption,

Relevant Individuals

26. The defendants' co-conspirators included Yukom Chief Executive Officer Lee

Elbaz (a/k/a Lena Green), Numaris office manager Ronen Roytman (a/k/a/ Alexander Goldman),

Yukom retention agents Lissa Mel (a/k/a Monica Sanders), Austin Smith (a/k/a John Ried), Shira

Uzan (a/k/a Emily Laski), Liora Welles (a/k/a Lindsay Cole a/k/a Lindsay Taylor a/k/a Lindsay

Wells), and others, including Representatives A through F, who also worked for entities within the

Binary Options Organization and represented to customers that they were salespeople and traders

for BinaryBook and BigOption.

7

Page 8: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 8 of 29

The Victims

27. The defendants and their co-conspirators targeted victims throughout the world and

the United States, including victims in the District of Maryland, including the following:

a. Victim A, an investor in BinaryBook, was a resident of Gaithersburg,

Maryland, located in the District of Maryland.

b. Victim B , an investor in BigOption, was a resident of Laurel, Maryland,

located in the District of Maryland.

c. Victim C, an investor in BinaryBook, was a resident of Annapolis.

Maryland, located in the District of Maryland.

28. As a result of the scheme, victims worldwide made over $110 million in net

deposits, representing losses to investors.

COUNT ONE

(Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud)

The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland further charges that:

29. Paragraphs 1 through 2$are realleged and incorporated herein by reference.

30. Beginning in or about May 2014 and continuing through in or about September

2017, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in the District of Maryland and elsewhere,

the defendants.

Y A K O V COHEN, a/k/a "Jay Collins," a/k/a "Kobi Cohen," Y O S E F HERZOG,

a/k/a "Yossi Herzog," OR1 MAYMON,

a/k/a "Or Maymon," a/k/a "Patrick Accardo,"

NISSIM A L F A S I , a/k/a "Nick Onasis," E L A D BIGELMAN,

a/k/a "Michael Goldberg,"

Page 9: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 9 of 29

RUNAL JEEBUN, a/k/a "Ryan Jeebun," SABRINA E L O F E R , a/k/a "Mila Morales,"

A F I K T O R I , a/k/a "Kevin White," a/k/a "Harvey Stone,"

ANOG MAAREK, a/k/a "Daniel Buckley," a/k/a "Daniel Marek,"

a/k/a "Hanog Dany Maarek," ORON MONTGOMERY,

a/k/a "Bill Shnizcr," DAVID BARZILAY,

a/k/a "Dave Simpson," GILAD MAZUGI,

a/k/a "Gilad Mazugy," a/k/a "Adam Bloom,"

a/k/a "Adam Morgan," HADAS BEN HAIM,

a/k/a "Jessica Giovanie," YOUSEF BISHARA,

a/k/a "Yossef Bshara," a/k/a "Omar Alamin,"

a/k/a "Omar Abdullah," and NIR E R E Z ,

a/k/a "Jack Cohen,"

and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, did knowingly and intentionally, that is, with

the intent to advance the conspiracy, combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with each other

and others, both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit wire fraud, that is, to knowingly

willfully, and with the intent to defraud, having devised and intending to devise a scheme and

artifice to defraud, and to obtain money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent

pretenses, representations, and promises, knowing such pretenses, representations, and promises

were false and fraudulent when made, transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire

communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, pictures, and sounds for the

purpose of executing the scheme and artifice in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section

1343.

9

Page 10: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 10 of 29

Purpose of the Conspiracy

31. It was the purpose of the conspiracy for the defendants and their co-conspirators to

obtain the maximum deposit from binary options investors and to take steps to ensure that investors

lost the money in their accounts or were otherwise unable to withdraw funds—thereby enriching

the defendants, their co-conspirators, and the Binary Options Organization in the process.

Manner and Means of the Conspiracy

32. The defendants and their co-conspirators induced investors to deposit funds based

on misrepresentations, including:

a. false statements and material omissions regarding the alignment of financial

incentives between investors and representatives;

b. false statements and material omissions regarding the suitability of binary-

options as investments and returns on investments in binary options;

c. false statements and material omissions about the names, qualifications, and

physical location of representatives assisting investors; and

d. false statements and material omissions regarding investors" ability to

withdraw investment funds and about the reasons that funds could not be withdrawn. False Statements and Material Omissions Regarding Alignment of Financial Incentives

Between Investors and Representatives of BinaryBook and BigOption

33. The defendants and their co-conspirators made or caused to be made materially

false statements and failed to disclose material information to binary options investors about

whether the financial incentives of representatives of BinaryBook and BigOption were aligned

with those of binary options investors.

34. Representatives of BinaryBook and BigOption, including retention agents

E L O F E R , T O R I , MAAREK, MONTGOMERY. B A R Z I L A Y , MAZUGI, BEN HAIM,

BISHARA. and E R E Z . working under the supervision of COHEN, HERZOG, MAYMON,

10

Page 11: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 11 of 29

ALFASI , BIGELMAN, JEEBUN. and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, claimed to

be representing the interests of investors when, in fact, they were not representing the interests of

investors. Retention agents falsely told investors and potential investors that they only made

money when the investors made money.

35. In truth and in fact, when investors lost money, COHEN and H E R Z O G , as

principals of the Binary Options Organization, profited. Retention agents within the Binary

Options Organization received commissions based on net investor deposits (i.e., investor deposits

minus withdrawals), not investor profits. In other words, retention agents were incentivized and

directed to maximize deposits and minimize withdrawals.

36. However, the defendants and their co-conspirators concealed from investors that

they made money on net deposits. The defendants and their co-conspirators also falsely claimed

that their financial interests were aligned with those of investors. For example:

a. On or about July 16, 2014, MAYMON falsely told an investor " I want to

work whit [sic] your account in bring it hi [sic] has [sic] we can."

b. On or about January 28, 2015, BIGELMAN falsely told an investor "my

job is to make sure your account will be profitable so we both will make money here."

c. In or about August 2015. E R E Z falsely told an investor that his "profits"

came "from your commission," meaning commission on successful trades. E R E Z also

falsely told the investor he was part of an investment team and "Our success rate at the

moment are talking [sic] between an interest rate of between 20-30%."

d. On or about March 3. 2016, ALFASI falsely told an investor "our job is to

make sure that you're making money."

11

Page 12: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 12 of 29

37. HERZOG, MAYMON. ALFASI . BIGELMAN. JEEBUN, BARZILAY, and

their co-conspirators also trained and encouraged retention agents employed by the Binary Options

Organization to make such misrepresentations. For example:

a. On or about June 11, 2014, JEEBUN circulated email "templates" to be

used with customers to COHEN and Elbaz that included misrepresentations such as "we,

at BigOption, have come up with two amazing offers, which give you the opportunity to

maximize profits and reduce losses at the same time'"; "you always have a winning hand

with BigOption"; and "'wishing you a successful trading experience!"

b. On or about June 29, 2014. Yukom retention agents, along with A L F A S L

H E R Z O G , COHEN, and JEEBUN. received a sample of a "mass email to all customers."

The email was titled "BigOption Learning Camp" and advertised that investors could

"learn the trading tools and strategies that will help you make whining trades."

c. On or about May 25, 2015, Mel emailed a "Call script" to MAYMON that

included misrepresentations such as "I 'm not here to make you rich in one day or one week

- I'm here to make sure that your financial future in trading is secure."

d. On or about February 25, 2016. Representative A, who was in charge of

training at Yukom, emailed a "Call script" to MAYMON, ALFASI , and BIGELMAN.

The "script" included various misrepresentations to be made to investors, including that " I

am only here to help you generate the profit you want to achieve" and that "my company

is very interested in helping you generate the biggest possible profit in the account."

e. On or about July 18, 2016, Representative B emailed a similar "Call script"

to BIGELMAN that included the misrepresentation, "[M]y job is to make sure that you

make as much money as possible."

12

Page 13: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 13 of 29

f. On or about August 4, 2016, BISHARA sent MAZUGI and other Yukom

employees a template email in which BISHARA falsely claimed to have master's degree

in "Economy & Finance'' from a U.S. university, that he was "making 83% profit for my

clients," and that "within first month of trading, client's account should generate 55-75%

profit."

g. On or about August 23-24, 2016, Elbaz corresponded with Representative

C about an upcoming training course for other representatives. On or about August 24,

2016, Representative C sent an email to Elbaz, Roytman, and others attaching a

" R E V I S E D " manual for the course, which included a section on addressing "Investor

Objections." Among other things, this training manual falsely claimed, "We have a mutual

goal here, to make you profits. When you make money, I make money."

h. A L F A S I saved a script in his Google Drive entitled "MANY

R E B U T T A L S " that included responses to potential objections from investors. For

example, the script included the false claim that "when you make money, we make money,"

and "[w]hen you don't make money, we actually lose money."

38. COHEN. HERZOG, MAYMON, ALFASI , BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and their

co-conspirators also trained and encouraged retention agents employed by the Binary Options

Organization to maximize investor deposits for the purpose of generating profits for the defendants

and their co-conspirators. For example:

a. On or about May 20, 2015, BIGELMAN wrote to BigOption retention

agents about reassigning potential investors. As BIGELMAN explained, "[yjourjob is to

call them and to tell the CM [i.e., customer] that the previous broker got promoted and you

13

Page 14: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 14 of 29

are going to handle the account for them." BIGELMAN further advised that "[tjhere is a

lot more money to take from these people."

b. On or about September 29, 2015. Representative D sent an email to other

representatives regarding a sales "marathon" in which representatives would compete with

one another and be rewarded based upon their ability to obtain investor deposits.

Representative D commented in the email, "This is not cemetery here! It's a boiler room!

. . . . DON'T L E A V E T H E MONEY! JUST T A K E I T ! "

c. On or about November 6, 2015, Representative D sent an email to other

representatives concerning their employment responsibilities, which, according to the

email, included "to squeeze and up-sale the investor."

d. On or about January 26, 2016, Representative E advised other

representatives about the use of an "Academy" training session, which was marketed to

investors as an educational program designed to improve their ability to successfully trade

on their own. Representative E advised others to "[rjemember that the goal is to get them

addicted to the platform and having them trade more volume."

e. On or about April 7,2016, BIGELMAN sent an email to a Yukom retention

agent with the subject line "|1 l]ey buddy good job, so far for today!!!!!!! Keep up the good

work!!!!!!!!!!!" The text of the email included, "PUSH PUSH PUSH T A K E

E V E R Y T H I N G T H E Y GOT."

39. In addition, the defendants and their co-conspirators also concealed from investors

that employees of the Binary Options Organization could manipulate the trading platform utilized

by BinaryBook and BigOption to alter the likelihood that investors in BinaryBook and BigOption

14

Page 15: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 15 of 29

would be able to profit on trades. That is, the defendants and their co-conspirators concealed from

investors that they could make it more or less likely that an investor could lose trades.

40. The defendants and their co-conspirators requested to have an investor placed on

the platform's "high risk" setting to adversely impact the investor's ability to win subsequent

trades. The defendants and their co-conspirators used the "high risk'' setting in order to attempt to

prevent an investor from profiting.

41. Conversely, the defendants and their co-conspirators requested to have an investor

placed on the platform's "low risk" setting to give the client the false impression that he or she

was generating significant returns on their investment. The defendants and their co-conspirators

used "low risk" to obtain further investments from investors.

a. For example, on or about January 16, 2015. BEN HAIM sent an email to a

Yukom manager requesting that a specific investor be "put on low risk."

b. On or about December 14, 2015, a Yukom retention agent emailed

BIGELMAN and MAYMON and asked that an investor be moved to low risk (increasing

his chance of winning trades), because " I T ' S A C L I E N T THAT HAS MONEY AND

WITH SOME SUPPORT I COULD G E T HIM FOR A BIG AMOUNT."

False Statements and Material Omissions Regarding the Suitability of Binary Options as Investments and Investment Returns

42. The defendants and their co-conspirators made or caused to be made materially

false statements and failed to disclose material information to binary options investors about the

suitability of their investments and about the expected returns on their investments.

43. In truth and in fact, most investors in BinaryBook and Big Option lost money and

the defendants and their co-conspirators knew that it was unlikely, if not impossible, to guarantee

success or specific rates of return in any binary options investment.

15

Page 16: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 16 of 29

44. Yet. the defendants and their co-conspirators, including retention agents E L O F E R ,

T O R E MAAREK. MONTGOMERY, BARZILAY, MAZUGI, BEN HAIM, BISHARA, and

E R E Z . working under the supervision of COHEN. H E R Z O G . MAYMON, A L F A S I ,

BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, concealed from

investors that most binary options investors lost money.

45. The defendants and their co-conspirators also falsely told investors and potential

investors that they could expect to see profits i f they traded in binary options. For example:

a. On or about June 29. 2014 through July 7. 2014, MAYMON falsely

represented to an investor that "1 believe that by the end of the month I will make you 20%

- 30% on your account" and that "the average client at [the Elite Trader Group] level could

see monthly profits in the $5,000 to $7,000 range."

b. On or about January 26. 2015 through January 28. 2015, BIGELMAN

emailed various investors about signing up for a ''managed account," which would involve

BIGELMAN "making .sure [sic] we will make about 15% - 20% profits a month."

c. On or about February 10, 2015, in response to a question from an investor,

BIGELMAN falsely claimed "the min[imum] that we make is 15% a month."

46. COHEN. HERZOG, MAYMON. ALFASI , BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and their

co-conspirators also trained and encouraged retention agents employed by the Binary Options

Organization to make such misrepresentations. For example:

a. On or about July 30, 2015, MAYMON internally circulated an email

template to be used with investors, which included false claims such as an " 8 1 % winning

rate" and that "we always have great trades for our group and this makes each investor rich,

calm and happy."

16

Page 17: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 17 of 29

b. On or about November 18. 2015. MAZUGI emailed BIGELMAN and

Elbaz asking for their thoughts on an email that regarding a purported trading opportunity

that included the claim " I believe this kind of opportunity won't come twice. Let's think

about it together, where else can we have a return on our investment of 75% in a period of

4 months??"

c. On or about November 30, 2015, a Yukom retention agent emailed

MAYMON and BIGELMAN asking for "thoughts" on l'[m]ail 1 sent to clients." The

email was titled "BigOption - Pension = safe?" and included representations such as ' i f

you want your savings, pension and retirement money to be safe! Al l you need to do is to

put it in binary account."

d. The "Call script" circulated to MAYMON, ALFASI , and B I G E L M A N by

Representative A on or about February 25,2016, falsely claimed that they "manage around

80 clients which are generating a profit of between 15-25 % on a monthly basis"; had an

"average success rate of 70%." which would yield a ''profit of 19%."

e. On or about June 3, 2016, B A R Z I L A Y sent a template email to Yukom

employees to send to investors, which falsely claimed a monthly return on investment of

"30%" "since early 2015," and that investors "can generate a return on investment (ROI)

of 30% on a monthly basis that compounds on its self \sic\."

f. On or about June 6, 2016, Representative A emailed a similar '"Call script"

to another Yukom employee that included various misrepresentations, including telling

investors that they "manage around 80 clients which are generating a profit of between 15

- 25 % on a monthly basis"; that they have a "track record, (success rate) [sic] which is

17

Page 18: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 18 of 29

70%" that would yield "'an average profit of 19%"; and that "the more funds we have in

your account - the bigger the profit."

g. The "Course manual" sent to Elbaz by Representative C on or about August

24, 2016 included misrepresentations such as "[tjhis account will allow [sic] to see much

higher proceeds than any form of bank in the financial market. (70%-80% Profit per

trade)." The manual also included the misrepresentation that "[t]oday I manage around 80

investors which are generating a profit of 15%- 25% on a monthly basis"; that "[t]he way

I achieve it for my investors is by relying on a track record of 70%, which means that for

each 10 trades, at least 7 will be in the money"; and that "[m]oney makes money, and the

more funds you have in your account- the bigger the profit you will be able to make."

h. A L F A S I saved a script in his Google Drive entitled "how to work attitude"

that advised representatives to falsely state that a purportedly available binary options

trading software had "up to 87% success rate."

False Statements and Material Omissions Regarding the Names, Qualifications, and Physical Location of Representatives

47. The defendants and their co-conspirators made or caused to be made materially

false statements and failed to disclose material information to binary options investors about the

true names, qualifications, and physical location of representatives of BinaryBook and BigOption

who were purporting to assist investors.

48. The defendants and their co-conspirators, including retention agents E L O F E R .

T O R I , MAAREK. MONTGOMERY. B A R Z I L A Y , MAZUGI, BEN HAIM, BISHARA. and

E R E Z , working under the supervision of COHEN. HERZOG, ' MAYMON, A L F A S L

BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, falsely represented

to investors that they had training and experience in financial markets and that they had degrees in

18

Page 19: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 19 of 29

finance or related fields. In truth and in fact, the defendants and their co-conspirators had virtually

no experience or education in in accounting, trading, or the financial markets.

49. The defendants and their co-conspirators also concealed the fact that they were

calling investors from Israel and falsely claimed to be located in the city of London in the United

Kingdom, or in other cities with established financial markets, rather than in Israel.

50. In addition, the defendants and their co-conspirators concealed their names and true

identites from investors and potential investors. For example, COHEN used the alias "Jay

Collins," MAYMON used the alias "Patrick Accardo," ALFASI used the alias "Nick Onasis,"

and BIGELMAN used the alias "Michael Goldberg." including when interacting with investors.

Such aliases were referred to internally within the Binary Options Organization as "stage names,"

and Elbaz approved these "stage names."

51 COHEN, H E R Z O G , MAYMON, ALFASI , BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and their

co-conspirators also trained and encouraged retention agents employed by the Binary Options

Organization to make such misrepresentations. For example:

a. The "Call script" sent to MAYMON. ALFASI , and BIGELMAN by

Representative A on or about February 25, 2016 included the claim, "[A]s you can

probably hear on my voice, I 'm not British originally, [sic] I'm actually from X X X and I

moved to London X X X years ago to complete my Master's degree in Economics from

X X X . " The "Call script" circulated on or about July 18, 2016 by Representative B to

BIGELMAN contained similar statements.

b. The "Course manual" sent to Elbaz by Representative C on or about August

24,2016 similarly included the representation to investors that "[a]s you can probably hear

by my voice, I am not British originally, I 'm actually from and I moved to

19

Page 20: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 20 of 29

London years ago to complete my Master's degree in Economics from

False Statements and Material Omissions Regarding Investors' Ability to Withdraw Funds from Accounts

52. The defendants and their co-conspirators made or caused to be made materially

false statements and failed to disclose material information to binary options investors about

investors' ability to withdraw funds from their accounts.

53. The defendants and their co-conspirators, including retention agents E L O F E R ,

TORI , MAAREK, MONTGOMERY, B A R Z I L A Y , MAZUGI. BEN HAIM. BISHARA. and

E R E Z , working under the supervision of COHEN. H E R Z O G . MAYMON. A L F A S I .

BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, falsely represented

to investors that investors could withdraw funds in their account upon request.

54. In truth and in fact, the defendants and their co-conspirators took steps to prevent

investors from withdrawing funds in their accounts. The defendants and their co-conspirators and

concealed from investors that the defendants and their co-conspirators were incentivized and

trained to prevent investor withdrawals and made misrepresentations to investors regarding the

ability to withdraw investor funds.

55. COHEN, HERZOG, MAYMON, ALFASI , BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and others

also trained and encouraged retention agents employed by the Binary Options Organization to

make such misrepresentations.

56. For example, the "Call script" sent from Representative B to BIGELMAN on or

about July 18, 2016 included the representation to investors that they "can withdraw [their] money

at any point in time." The "script" also included the representation that the investor's money is

20

Page 21: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 21 of 29

"totally liquid—meaning, that if for any reason you need your money back for an emergency, it's

literally a click away.'"

57. In fact, the defendants and their co-conspirators took steps to prevent certain

investors from withdrawing funds, including purported training sessions and placing "bonuses,"

"risk-free trades," and "insured trades" in an investor's account.

58. For example, one tactic to prevent withdrawals was to offer investors the use of an

"Academy" session that would supposedly provide them with the skills to improve their trading

performance by explaining certain market concepts to them. In fact, the information provided in

such sessions did not materially improve investors' trading performance.

59. Another tactic to prevent withdrawals was to put an investor account under

investigation to delay the withdrawal while representatives tried to convince the investor to cancel

the withdrawal. For example, on or about May 20, 2015. BIGELMAN emailed JEEBUN about

an investor that was seeking a withdrawal and stated, "[w]e need to do what we talked about this

week." JEEBUN responded, "will get his account under investigation."

60. In addition to the tactics described above, the defendants and their co-conspirators

also used so-called "bonuses," "risk-free trades," and "insured trades" to impede investors' ability

to withdraw funds from their accounts. COHEN. H E R Z O G , MAYMON, ALFASI ,

BIGELMAN, JEEBUN, and their co-conspirators trained and encouraged retention agents

employed by the Binary Options Organization to use "bonuses," "risk-free trades," and "insured

trades" to prevent investors from withdraw funds from their accounts and to conceal the nature

and purpose of these tactics from investors and to make misrepresentations regarding the nature

and purpose of "bonuses." "risk-free trades," and "insured trades." For example:

21

Page 22: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 22 of 29

a. On or about July 15, 2014, MAYMON falsely promised an investor that " I

guarantee that any time that you'll have bonus in your account you'll be able to withdrawal

[sicj your initial investment without complicating things and no questions asked."

b. The "Call script" circulated to MAYMON, A L F A S I , and BIGELMAN by

Representative A on or about February 25, 2016, claimed that "[t]he bonus is there to help

us leverage the account" and that "you can always withdraw your initial investment and

the profit but you cannot withdraw the bonus, [sic] it is just there to help us leverage the

account." This "Call script" did not include a discussion of any turnover requirement

imposed by the "bonus."

c. On or about June 16. 2015, JEEBUN informed BIGELMAN that an

investor seeking to withdraw "is going to get an email from support that she won 5k bonus

on the account" in order to prevent the withdrawal. On or about June 22, 2015,

BIGELMAN sent an update that "[w]e have added the bonus (this is what we spoke

about)" but there had been no contact from the investor. BIGELMAN concluded, "We

will keep on trying to get her to trade."

61. Requests for withdrawals by investors would occasionally be granted, including f 1)

as a "test withdrawal/" designed to encourage an investor to invest more money; and (2) to prevent

a"chargeback."

a. First, requests for withdrawals by investors would sometimes be granted in

order to retain the investor with the ultimate objective of obtaining more money in the

future. The defendants and their co-conspirators concealed the nature and purpose of these

"test withdrawals" from investors.

22

Page 23: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 23 of 29

b. For example, on or about July 4, 2016. Representative F, who worked in the

"Finance Department," wrote an email to JEEBUN, BIGELMAN, MAYMON, and other

representatives about "test" withdrawals. Representative F wrote, "[l]t is a good thing to

send [the customer] funds without applying any charges in view of getting more deposits

from that [customer] in the future."

c. Second, requests for withdrawals by investors would sometimes be granted

in order to prevent credit card chargebacks, because payment service providers would

refuse to work with companies with high chargeback ratios. Payment service providers

were necessary for accepting credit card deposits. Withdrawals were sent when it was

determined there was a high risk of a chargeback in order to help preserve relationships

with the payment service providers.

d. For example, on or about May 26. 2015, BIGELMAN explained to

JEEBUN that he had approved a withdrawal request because "we couldn't get the CM

[customer] over the phone so I guess I didn't wanted [sic] to risk with C B [chargeback]."

Overt Acts in Furtherance of the Conspiracy

62. The defendants and their co-conspirators communicated by email and telephone

with victims throughout the world and the United States, including victims in the District of

Maryland. In addition to the overt acts described above, the defendants and their co-conspirators

committed the additional overt acts:

a. On or about August 28, 2015, Smith, on behalf of BinaryBook, emailed

Victim A with bank wire-transfer instructions in order for Victim A to send additional

money as an investment.

b. On or about January 7, 2015, BEN HAIM, on behalf of BigOption, emailed

Victim B in an effort to solicit additional investments from Victim B.

23

Page 24: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 24 of 29

c. On or about March 10, 2015, Welles, on behalf of BigOption, emailed

Victim B about speaking further about trades place in Victim B's account.

d. On or about December 7, 2015, Uzan, on behalf of BinaryBook, emailed

Victim C in order to solicit additional investments from Victim C.

18U.S.C. § 1349

COUNTS TWO THROUGH FOUR (Wire Fraud)

The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland further charges that:

63. Paragraphs 1 through 2$and 32 through 62 are realleged and incorporated herein

by reference.

64. Beginning in or about May 2014 and continuing through in or about September

2017, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in the District of Maryland and elsewhere,

the defendants.

Y A K O V COHEN, a/k/a "Jay Collins," a/k/a "Kobi Cohen," Y O S E F H E R Z O G ,

a/k/a "Yossi Herzog," ORI MAYMON,

a/k/a "Or Maymon," a/k/a "Patrick Accardo,"

NISSIM ALFASI , a/k/a "Nick Onasis," E L A D BIGELMAN,

a/k/a "Michael Goldberg," RUNAL JEEBUN,

a/k/a "Ryan Jeebun," SABRINA E L O F E R , a/k/a "Mila Morales,"

A F I K T O R I , a/k/a "Kevin White," a/k/a "Harvey Stone,"

ANOG MAAREK, a/k/a "Daniel Buckley," a/k/a "Daniel Marek,"

24

Page 25: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 25 of 29

a/k/a "Hanog Dany Maarek," ORON MONTGOMERY,

a/k/a "Bill Shnizer," DAVID B A R Z I L A Y ,

a/k/a "Dave Simpson," GILAD MAZUGI,

a/k/a "Gilad Mazugy," a/k/a "Adam Bloom,"

a/k/a "Adam Morgan," HAD AS BEN HAIM,

a/k/a "Jessica Giovanie," YOUSEF BISHARA,

a/k/a "Yossef Bshara," a/k/a "Omar Alamin,"

a/k/a "Omar Abdullah," and NIR E R E Z ,

a/k/a "Jack Cohen,"

aiding and abetting and being aided and abetted by each other and others known and unknown to

the Grand Jury, did knowingly and willfully, and w7ith the intent to defraud, having devised and

intending to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and to obtain money and property by means

of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, knowing such

pretenses, representations, and promises were false and fraudulent when made, transmit and cause

to be transmitted, by means of wire communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings,

signs, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing the scheme and artifice.

Purpose

65. The Grand Jury realleges and incorporates by reference paragraph 31 of this

Indictment as a description of the purpose of the scheme and artifice.

Manner and Means

66. The Grand Jury realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 32 through 62

of this Indictment as a description of the manners and means of the scheme and artifice.

25

Page 26: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 26 of 29

Use of the Wires

67. On or about the dates set forth below, in the District of Maryland and elsewhere,

the defendants.

Y A K O V COHEN, a/k/a "Jay Collins," a/k/a "Kobi Cohen," Y O S E F HERZOG,

a/k/a "Yossi Herzog," ORI MAYMON,

a/k/a "Or Maymon," a/k/a "Patrick Accardo,"

NISSIM ALFASI , a/k/a "Nick Onasis," E L A D BIGELMAN,

a/k/a "Michael Goldberg," RUNAL JEEBUN,

a/k/a "Ryan Jeebun," SABRINA E L O F E R , a/k/a "Mila Morales,"

A F I K T O R I , a/k/a "Kevin White," a/k/a "Harvey Stone,"

ANOG MAAREK, a/k/a "Daniel Buckley," a/k/a "Daniel Marek,"

a/k/a "Hanog Dany Maarek," ORON MONTGOMERY,

a/k/a "Bill Shnizcr," DAVID BARZILAY,

a/k/a "Dave Simpson," GILAD MAZUGI,

a/k/a "Gilad Mazugy," a/k/a "Adam Bloom,"

a/k/a "Adam Morgan," HADAS BEN HA1M,

a/k/a "Jessica Giovanie," Y O U S E F BISHARA,

a/k/a "YossefBshara," a/k/a "Omar Alamin,"

a/k/a "Omar Abdullah," and NIR E R E Z ,

a/k/a "Jack Cohen,"

26

Page 27: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 27 of 29

and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, for the purpose of executing and attempting to

execute the aforesaid scheme to defraud, knowingly caused to be transmitted by means of wire

communications in interstate commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds, to wit:

Count Date Description

2 On or about August 28, 2015

Email from Austin Smith on behalf of BinaryBook to Victim A with bank wire-transfer instructions, through interstate and foreign commerce and while Victim A was in the District of Maryland

3 On or about March 10, 2015

Email from Liora Welles on behalf of BigOption to Victim B about speaking further regarding trades placed in Victim B's account, through interstate and foreign commerce and while Victim B was in the District of Maryland

4 On or about December 7, 2015

Email from Shira Uzan on behalf of BinaryBook to Victim C soliciting additional investments, through interstate and foreign commerce and while Victim C was in the District of Maryland

18 U.S.C. § 1343 18 U.S.C. § 2

F O R F E I T U R E A L L E G A T I O N

The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland further finds that:

68. Pursuant to Rule 32.2, Fed. R. Crim. P., notice is hereby given to the defendants

that the United States will seek forfeiture as part of any sentence in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 2461(c). in the event of the defendants" conviction under any of Counts One through Four of this

Indictment.

69. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One through Four of this Indictment,

the defendants,

Y A K O V COHEN, a/k/a "Jay Collins," a/k/a "Kobi Cohen," Y O S E F HERZOG,

a/k/a "Yossi Herzog,"

27

Page 28: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 28 of 29

ORI MAYMON, a/k/a "Or Maymon,"

a/k/a "Patrick Accardo," NISSIM ALFASI ,

a/k/a "Nick Onasis," E L A D BIGELMAN,

a/k/a "Michael Goldberg," RUNAL JEEBUN,

a/k/a "Ryan Jeebun," SABRINA E L O F E R , a/k/a "Mila Morales,"

A F I K T O R I , a/k/a "Kevin White," a/k/a "Harvey Stone,"

ANOG MAAREK, a/k/a "Daniel Buckley," a/k/a "Daniel Marek,"

a/k/a "Hanog Dany Maarek," ORON MONTGOMERY,

a/k/a "Bill Shnizer," DAVID BARZILAY,

a/k/a "Dave Simpson," GILAD MAZUGI,

a/k/a "Gilad Mazugy," a/k/a "Adam Bloom,"

a/k/a "Adam Morgan," HADAS BEN HAIM,

a/k/a "Jessica Giovanie," Y O U S E F BISHARA,

a/k/a "Yossef Bshara," a/k/a "Omar Alamin,"

a/k/a "Omar Abdullah," and NIR E R E Z ,

a/k/a "Jack Cohen,"

shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), any property, real or

personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to such violation.

Substitute Assets

70. If, as a result of any act or omission of any defendant, any proceeds subject to

forfeiture:

a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

28

Page 29: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT T FOR THE DISTRIC …

Case 8:19-cr-00077-PX *SEALED* Document 28 Filed 09/25/19 Page 29 of 29

b. have been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

c. have been placed beyond the j urisdiction of the court;

d. have been substantially diminished in value; or

e. have been commingled with other property that cannot be subdivided without difficulty;

it is the intent of the United States of America, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), to seek forfeiture

of any other property of said defendants up to the value of the forfeitable property.

18 U.S.C. § 981 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c)

R O B E R T ZINK Chief Criminal Division, Fraud Section United States Department of Justice

L / R U S H ATKINSON. Trial Mtorney C A I T L I N R. COTTINGHAM, Trial Attorney Criminal Division, Fraud Section United States Department of Justice

A T R I I F . R T T . T . - .

SIGNATURE REDACTED Date: i f o / ^ ? roreperson

29