Heat Flux Method

49
Experimental And Numerical Study Of Laminar Burning Velocity Of Methane-Air Mixture Using Heat Flux Method Pawan Kumar (SC11B038) Under the guidance of: Dr. Prathap C. Asst. Professor, IIST Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology Thiruvananthapuram 29 April, 2015

Transcript of Heat Flux Method

Page 1: Heat Flux Method

Experimental And Numerical Study OfLaminar Burning Velocity Of Methane-Air

Mixture Using Heat Flux Method

Pawan Kumar (SC11B038)

Under the guidance of:Dr. Prathap C.

Asst. Professor, IIST

Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology

Thiruvananthapuram

29 April, 2015

Page 2: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Outline

1 IntroductionAim

2 Laminar Burning Velocity

3 Heat Flux MethodExperimental Result

4 Numerical Method

5 Results And DiscussionsComputational Result

6 Conclusions

7 Scope of Future Work

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 2/33

Page 3: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Aim

1 To design a new flat flame burner according to VanMaaren (1993) and fabricated it. The burner is validatedaccording to CH4-Air mixture. 1, 2

2 Using Heat Flux MethodExperimentally anchor an adiabatic laminar Flat Flame.Measurement of Laminar Burning Velocity of 1-D adiabaticflame using Flat Flame Burner.

3 2-D and 3-D simulation using ANSYS-FLUENT

4 Comparison of 2-D and 3-D simulation results.

1L. De Goey, A. Van Maaren, and R. Quax, Stabilization of adiabatic premixed laminar flames on a flatflame burner,

2K. J. Bosschaart and d. L. Goey, Extension of the heat flux method to subatmospheric pressures,

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 3/33

Page 4: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Aim

1 To design a new flat flame burner according to VanMaaren (1993) and fabricated it. The burner is validatedaccording to CH4-Air mixture. 1, 2

2 Using Heat Flux MethodExperimentally anchor an adiabatic laminar Flat Flame.Measurement of Laminar Burning Velocity of 1-D adiabaticflame using Flat Flame Burner.

3 2-D and 3-D simulation using ANSYS-FLUENT

4 Comparison of 2-D and 3-D simulation results.

1L. De Goey, A. Van Maaren, and R. Quax, Stabilization of adiabatic premixed laminar flames on a flatflame burner,

2K. J. Bosschaart and d. L. Goey, Extension of the heat flux method to subatmospheric pressures,

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 3/33

Page 5: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Aim

1 To design a new flat flame burner according to VanMaaren (1993) and fabricated it. The burner is validatedaccording to CH4-Air mixture. 1, 2

2 Using Heat Flux MethodExperimentally anchor an adiabatic laminar Flat Flame.Measurement of Laminar Burning Velocity of 1-D adiabaticflame using Flat Flame Burner.

3 2-D and 3-D simulation using ANSYS-FLUENT

4 Comparison of 2-D and 3-D simulation results.

1L. De Goey, A. Van Maaren, and R. Quax, Stabilization of adiabatic premixed laminar flames on a flatflame burner,

2K. J. Bosschaart and d. L. Goey, Extension of the heat flux method to subatmospheric pressures,

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 3/33

Page 6: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Introduction

Combustion is a rapid oxidation

process of fuel which generates

essentially heat and sometimes light.

• A flame front is a visible part of exothermic reaction.

• Flame is self sustaining zone of localized combustion.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 4/33

Page 7: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

On the basis of phases the fuel can be divided in three type :

Fuel

Gas SolidLiquid

Methane(CH4)

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 5/33

Page 8: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Types of Flame: On the basis of state of mixedness

• Premixed Flame

• Non-Premixed Flame

The laminar premixed flames can be characterised by thefollowing ways:

• Laminar Burning Velocity

• Quenching Distance: Minimum distance for flame to quench.

• Flammability Limit: The lowest mole fraction of fuel andoxidiser require to anchor a flame.

• Minimum Ignition Energy : Minimum amount of energyrequired to ignite a sustainable flame

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 6/33

Page 9: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Types of Flame: On the basis of state of mixedness

• Premixed Flame

• Non-Premixed Flame

The laminar premixed flames can be characterised by thefollowing ways:

• Laminar Burning Velocity

• Quenching Distance: Minimum distance for flame to quench.

• Flammability Limit: The lowest mole fraction of fuel andoxidiser require to anchor a flame.

• Minimum Ignition Energy : Minimum amount of energyrequired to ignite a sustainable flame

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 6/33

Page 10: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Experimental Methods For Laminar BurningVelocity

Stationary Flames

• Conical Flame Method(Orifice/Nozzle/Slot)

• Counter Flow Method

• Flat Flame Method (Heat FluxMethod)

Propagating Flames

• Cylindrical Tube Method

• Spherical Bomb Method

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 7/33

Page 11: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Experimental Methods For Laminar BurningVelocity

Stationary Flames

• Conical Flame Method(Orifice/Nozzle/Slot)

• Counter Flow Method

• Flat Flame Method (Heat FluxMethod)

Propagating Flames

• Cylindrical Tube Method

• Spherical Bomb Method

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 7/33

Page 12: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Experimental Methods For Laminar BurningVelocity

Stationary Flames

• Conical Flame Method(Orifice/Nozzle/Slot)

• Counter Flow Method

• Flat Flame Method (Heat FluxMethod)

Propagating Flames

• Cylindrical Tube Method

• Spherical Bomb Method

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 7/33

Page 13: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Laminar Burning Velocity

is defined as the relative velocity, of unburned reactantspropagating normal to the flame front.

SL = Ug

Flame Front

Unburnt Gas

Burner

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 8/33

Page 14: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Laminar Burning Velocity

is defined as the relative velocity, of unburned reactantspropagating normal to the flame front.

SL = Ug

Flame Front

Unburnt Gas

Burner

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 8/33

Page 15: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Figure 1: Complete Setup Of Heat Flux Method

11 12

3

7

4

6

1

2

5

8

9

10

A (1). Compressor (5). Methane Cylinder (9). Computer

(2). Air tank with pressure (6). Methane Rotameter (10). Sony Camera

(3). Valve (7). Burner Stand (11). Hotwater Chamber

(4). Air Rotameter (8). Burner with Flame (12). Coldwater Chamber

Experimetal Setup for Flat Flame Burner Using Heat Flux Method

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 9/33

Page 16: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Heat Flux Method

The heat flux method is based on measuring the net heat lossfrom the flame to the burner.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 10/33

Page 17: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Heat Flux Method

The heat flux method is based on measuring the net heat lossfrom the flame to the burner.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 10/33

Page 18: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Energy Balance

To analyse the heat flux balance in the burner platequantitatively, we will consider the energy equation :

− ∂∂x

[λp,x(r)∂Tp

∂x

]− 1

r∂∂r

[λp,r (r)r ∂Tp

∂r

]= α(x)[Tg − Tp]

λ = Thermal Conductivity (for brass λ = 129Wm−1K−1)α = Volumetric Heat Transfer Coefficient (Wm−3K−1)p= Plateg = gasx and r are axial and radial direction respectively.Tp and Tg = f(x,r)

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 11/33

Page 19: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Energy Balance

To analyse the heat flux balance in the burner platequantitatively, we will consider the energy equation :

− ∂∂x

[λp,x(r)∂Tp

∂x

]− 1

r∂∂r

[λp,r (r)r ∂Tp

∂r

]= α(x)[Tg − Tp]

λ = Thermal Conductivity (for brass λ = 129Wm−1K−1)α = Volumetric Heat Transfer Coefficient (Wm−3K−1)p= Plateg = gasx and r are axial and radial direction respectively.Tp and Tg = f(x,r)

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 11/33

Page 20: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Energy Balance

To analyse the heat flux balance in the burner platequantitatively, we will consider the energy equation :

− ∂∂x

[λp,x(r)∂Tp

∂x

]− 1

r∂∂r

[λp,r (r)r ∂Tp

∂r

]= α(x)[Tg − Tp]

λ = Thermal Conductivity (for brass λ = 129Wm−1K−1)α = Volumetric Heat Transfer Coefficient (Wm−3K−1)p= Plateg = gasx and r are axial and radial direction respectively.Tp and Tg = f(x,r)

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 11/33

Page 21: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

−1r∂∂r

[λp,r (r)r ∂

∂r

∫ h

oTpdx

]=

∫ h

oα(x)[Tg − Tp]

+λp,x∂Tp

∂x|x=h − λp,x ∂Tp

∂x|x=0 = q(r)

Where as q is net heat transfer . For 1-D flame , q isindependent of r.

Avg .Temperature : Tp(r) = 1h

∫ h

oTpdx

• Temperature gradient along φ is zero because of symmetry.

• Also this is for steady state.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 12/33

Page 22: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

−1r∂∂r

[λp,r (r)r ∂

∂r

∫ h

oTpdx

]=

∫ h

oα(x)[Tg − Tp]

+λp,x∂Tp

∂x|x=h − λp,x ∂Tp

∂x|x=0 = q(r)

Where as q is net heat transfer . For 1-D flame , q isindependent of r.

Avg .Temperature : Tp(r) = 1h

∫ h

oTpdx

• Temperature gradient along φ is zero because of symmetry.

• Also this is for steady state.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 12/33

Page 23: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

−1r∂∂r

[λp,r (r)r ∂Tp(r)

∂r

]= q(r)

h

Assuming that the conduction coefficient λp,r does not dependon temperature, and therefore not on r , equation can be solvedeasily by Integrating over burner plate thickness x=0 to x=h.

Tp(r) = Tcenter − q4λh

r 2

Using the above equation relation between Tp and r isparabolic and axis symmetric.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 13/33

Page 24: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

EXPERIMENTAL FACILITY

Figure 2: Burner Head

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 13/33

Page 25: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

The new burner3 is shown in Figure 1. It consists of a burnerhead, and a plenum chamber.

3Vaan Maaren.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 14/33

Page 26: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Burner Head

• Perforated Plate

• Heating/Cooling Jacket

Figure 3: Burner Head (Heating/Cooling Jacket)

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 15/33

Page 27: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Plate Dia Thickness Hole Dia Pitch Pattern32 2 0.5 0.7 Hexagonal

Table 1: Perforated Plate Specification4

4All dimension are in mm

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 16/33

Page 28: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Thermocouple

K-type thermocouples were attached to the brass plate having1.5 mm blind hole at different radial locations, as thetemperature distribution is constant in the tangential direction.

Figure 4: Thermocouple Temperature Variation

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 17/33

Page 29: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Thermocouple

K-type thermocouples were attached to the brass plate having1.5 mm blind hole at different radial locations, as thetemperature distribution is constant in the tangential direction.

Figure 4: Thermocouple Temperature Variation

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 17/33

Page 30: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Thermocouple

K-type thermocouples were attached to the brass plate having1.5 mm blind hole at different radial locations, as thetemperature distribution is constant in the tangential direction.

Figure 4: Thermocouple Temperature Variation

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 17/33

Page 31: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Procedure

1 Supply the air for some time.

2 Supply the hot water in heating jacket and wait till theradial profile temperature of plate become uniform.

3 After that pass the methane and ignite the flame.

4 Wait for certain time for constant temperature.

5 Vary the velocity with keeping the equivalence ratioconstant and change the flow rate of air and CH4 usingrotameter.

6 Also change the equivalence ratio and find thecorresponding velocity.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 18/33

Page 32: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Procedure

1 Supply the air for some time.

2 Supply the hot water in heating jacket and wait till theradial profile temperature of plate become uniform.

3 After that pass the methane and ignite the flame.

4 Wait for certain time for constant temperature.

5 Vary the velocity with keeping the equivalence ratioconstant and change the flow rate of air and CH4 usingrotameter.

6 Also change the equivalence ratio and find thecorresponding velocity.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 18/33

Page 33: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Experimental Result:

Figure 5: Laminar Burning Velocity(Sl) vs Equivalence Ratios(φ)

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 19/33

Page 34: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Figure 6: Uncertainity in Result of Present Study

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 20/33

Page 35: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Numerical Method

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 21/33

Page 36: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

2-D Axis-symmetry Simulation

Quadrilateral 199,064

Total Cells 199,064

Total Points 200,550

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 22/33

Page 37: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

2-D Axis-symmetry Simulation

Quadrilateral 199,064

Total Cells 199,064

Total Points 200,550

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 22/33

Page 38: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Pointwise Grid

2-D Computational Grid

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 23/33

Page 39: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

ANSYS-FLUENT Problem Setup

There are many options to specify when computational fluiddynamics model needs to be setup.

Table 2: Steps To solve Computational Fluid Dynamics Model

Solver Type Pressure-BasedViscous Model Laminar

Gravitational Effects OFF2D Space Axisymmetric

Pressure Velocity Coupling SIMPLEMomentum Equation Discretization Second-Order Upwind

Species Equation Discretization Second-Order UpwindEnergy Equation Discretization Second-Order Upwind

The viscous model was set to be laminar, since the Reynoldsnumber was kept ( Re< 2000) and the work is at steady state.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 24/33

Page 40: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

• Gas : Ideal

• Flow : Laminar

• Inlet pressure : 1 atm

• Inlet Temperature : 300 K

• Fuel : Methane

• Oxidiser : Air

• Chemical Kinetics Scheme : Methane-AirSingle Step Chemistry

• Patching : 2400 K

• Adapation : Gradient Based

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 25/33

Page 41: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 26/33

Page 42: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Results And Discussions

Computational Result:

Figure 7: Mass Fraction (CH4,O2,CO2,H2O) along with AxialCoordinate (m)

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 27/33

Page 43: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

3-D Simulation

Figure 8: 3-D Grid

Hexahedral 8,039250

Prism 127,710

Total Cells 8,166960

Total Points 8,398,954

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 28/33

Page 44: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

3-D Simulation

Figure 8: 3-D Grid

Hexahedral 8,039250

Prism 127,710

Total Cells 8,166960

Total Points 8,398,954

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 28/33

Page 45: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Comparison between 2-D and 3-D result

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 29/33

Page 46: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Comparison between 2-D and 3-D result conti..

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 30/33

Page 47: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Conclusions

In this project work, the methane-air flames has beenanchored on the basis of the experiment , 2D and 3Dnumerical simulation of a perforated-plate burner.

The measured values of laminar burning velocity werecompared with the literature data and the comparison wasgood.

The flame height increase with the increase in the inletvelocity.

Comparision between 2-D and 3-D simulation was alsoreasonably good.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 31/33

Page 48: Heat Flux Method

Flat FlameUsing Heat

Flux Method

Introduction

Aim

LaminarBurningVelocity

Heat FluxMethod

ExperimentalResult

NumericalMethod

Results AndDiscussions

ComputationalResult

Conclusions

Scope ofFuture Work

Scope of Future Work

Future work can be continued through well developedmeasurement technique is as follows:

• Velocity measurement can also be calculated forpropagating flame by using other method like freelypropagating Spherical Flame Method.

• The present design can be modified more importantly withthe application of a microcontroller operated by itsappropriate programming to derive the desired result (as inthe form of velocity) directly on to the display.

• The setup is only suitable for gaseous fuels. So, this setupcan be modified for the measurement of burning velocityof liquid fuels.

• This setup can also be used for see the dilutant effect onlaminar burning velocity.

Flat Flame Using Heat Flux Method 29 April, 2015 32/33

Page 49: Heat Flux Method

Thank You!