Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
Transcript of Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
1/41
1
DNA BARCODING OF FRESHWATER EPHEMEROPTERANS AND
ODONATES IMPORTANT IN WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF
TWO INDIAN RIVERS
Project Proposal Submitted toCentral Pollution Control Board, New Delhi (CPCB)
(Revised as per reviewers comments)
Principal Investigator : Dr. Linu Mathew
Co- Investigators : 1 Dr. J. G. Ray
2 Dr. Pratima Akolkar
.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
2/41
2
CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, NEW DELHI (CPCB)
APPLICATION FOR GRANT FOR RESEARCH PROJECT
(To be completed by the Principal investigator)
1. Title of the Project
DNA Barcoding of Freshwater Ephemeropterans and Odonates Important In Water Quality Assessment of Two Indian Rivers
2. Name and Designation of the
Principal-Investigator : Dr. Linu Mathew
3. Postal Address of the Principal
Investigator : Assistant Professor in BiotechnologySchool of Biosciences
Mahatma Gandhi University
PD Hills (PO), Kottayam
E mail: [email protected]
4. Name of the institution/organization
in which the project will be carried out : School of Biosciences,Mahatma Gandhi
University, PD Hills (PO), Kottayam
5. Name of other institution(s)/
Organization (s) involved in the project : Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi.
6. Duration of the project : 2 Years
7. Total amount of assistance required : 20, 00000(Twenty lakhs only)
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
3/41
3
DNA BARCODING OF FRESHWATER EPHEMEROPTERANS AND
ODONATES IMPORTANT IN WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF
TWO INDIAN RIVERS
Statement- 1
ABSTRACT
Ephemeroptera (May flies) and Odonates (dragon flies) are sensitive indicators, very
important to the assessment of water quality. Mayflies and dragon flies typically are indicators
of clean water and a healthy environment, because most species are relatively intolerant to
pollution. River Ganges and River Pampa are two holy rivers of India, in the north and south
respectively. Both the holy rivers are subjected to high pollution load during the pilgrimage
seasons and also from urban and agricultural sources throughout the year. Keeping these
under consideration, a comparative study based on the ecology and taxonomy of
Ephemeropterans and Odonates of the two famous rivers of India (The Pampa and the
Ganges) will be carried out to assess the water quality status based on these well-known water
quality indicator organisms. Classical taxonomical approaches as well as DNA barcoding
technique will be used for species identification and ultimately the identification of insects
using the modern method would be applied to easy interpretation of water quality assessment
of all rivers of India subjected to pollution . The technique of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
barcoding, for identification of species by means of sequencing a short region of DNA
normally the Cytochrome C oxidase I gene (COI)was first described and tested by Hebert et
al. (2003). This illustrates the methodical creation of a library of DNA barcodes that will link
newly collected specimens to a reference library of authoritatively identified specimens. This
will eventually provide the exact knowledge of species diversity, species composition of
unknown faunas, accurate (i.e. avoiding mis-identification) and consistent identification oftaxons (level of taxonomic identification e.g. family/genus/species thereby shedding light on
identification and revealing species not currently described in larval taxonomic keys. This
project incorporates two methods linked together: biomonitoring of Ephemeropterans
important in water quality assessment and DNA barcoding, in an effort to gain a greater
understanding of how traditional taxonomic approaches compare to species identification by
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
4/41
4
DNA barcoding and how this may affect interpretation of water quality. In this study a small
sequence of DNA containing an approximately 700 base pair regions of the Mitochondrial
Cytochrome C oxidase I gene (COI) should be isolated from the benthic samples since most
eukaryotic cells containmitochondria,and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has a relatively fast
mutation rate, which results in significant variation in mtDNA sequences between species
and, in principle, a comparatively small variance will exist within species. This avoids the
time-consuming and expensive task of sequencing the entire genome of the animal and
consequently reducing the cost. The basic methodology involved are Collection and
Identification of Ephemeropteran and Odonate larvae from two Indian rivers noted for its
religious and sociological importance namely river Pampa of Kerala and river Ganges,
Specimen Preservation, DNA Isolation from the preserved samples, Polymerase Chain
Reaction (PCR) and DNA Sequencing of the COI gene, DNA Sequencing, Sequence Editing
and Alignment of the COI gene and identification of the Species. Parallel to the collection of
these organisms, field analysis of certain important water quality parameters of respective
sample waters such as, temperature, conductivity, salinity, total solids (TS) total dissolved
solids (TDS), dissolved oxygen (DO), dissolved CO2, dissolved chlorides, fluorides, hardness
and transparency using a Secchi disc also would be carried out to assess the ecology of these
specie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryotehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryote -
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
5/41
5
Statement II
INTRODUCTION
The technique of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) barcoding, whereby species areidentified by means of sequencing a short region of DNAnormally the Mitochondrial
Cytochrome C oxidase I gene (COI)was first described and tested by Hebert et al. (2003).
In recent years particularly with the introduction of the concept of DNA barcoding in 2003
efforts have been directed towards building a standard sequence library for all eukaryotes by
focusing DNA sequencing efforts on small, species specific portions of the genome called
DNA barcodes (Marshall, 2005).
Back ground of the work: Over 1.9 M species have been formally described since
Linnaeus first started the task 250 years ago, yet it is estimated that 10100 M species exist on
Earth (Wilson, 1985; Chapman, 2009). Therefore, not only is our characterization of
biodiversity painstakingly slow, but the fact that there is order-of-magnitude uncertainty in
our best estimate for the totality of Earths biodiversity. Wilson, 1985 suggests that current
tools and techniques are inadequate for the task of accurate assessment. What is the species
composition of a particular ecosystem? How does biodiversity change over time, space,
and in relation to future environmental change? are both fundamental questions trying to
answer through biomonitoring programs, by employing biotic surveys to assess change in
threatened habitats.
Molecular genetic analysis can help resolve some of these issues. This approach has
been used in the past to distinguish morphologically cryptic species of macro invertebrates in
ecological and evolutionary studies, but these methods were expensive and time consuming
(e.g., Sweeney et al. 1987, Funk et al. 1988, Funk and Sweeney 1990, Sweeney and Funk
1991, Jackson and Resh 1992, 1998). Recent advances in direct sequencing of
deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) make molecular methods more readily available to help resolve
taxonomic challenges presented by fauna in general (Hebert et al. 2003) and freshwater
macroinvertebrates in particular (Sharley et al. 2004, Pfenninger et al. 2007, Zhou et al. 2007,
2009, 2010, Sinclair and Gresens 2008, Stahls and Savolainen 2008, Krosch et al. 2009).
In this study a small sequence of DNA containing an approximately 700 base pair
regions of the Mitochondrial Cytochrome C oxidase I gene (COI) should be isolated from the
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
6/41
6
benthic samples since most eukaryotic cells contain mitochondria, and mitochondrial DNA
(mtDNA) has a relatively fast mutation rate, which results in significant variation in mtDNA
sequences between species and, in principle, a comparatively small variance will exist within
species. Using the CO1 gene enables species level identification while eliminating the time-
consuming and expensive task of sequencing the entire genome of the animal and
consequently this significantly reduces the cost. In the past seven years, over 1.1 M
individuals from about 95,000 species have been added to the DNA barcode library
(Ratnasingam, 2007). Another major objective of the series is to illustrate the importance of
careful and methodical creation of a library of DNA barcodes that will link existing Linnaean
names and ecological information associated with them to barcode sequences. This library
building process needs to occur at local, regional, national, and international scales.
Janzen (2004) passionately argues for this technology as a way to promote his idea of
bioliteracy, which he describes as the ability to understand species diversity on a genetic
level to promote greater appreciation and conservation of the natural world. Barcoding has
already been utilized confirm or modify morphological species determinations for insects (i.e.
Astraptes fulgerator complex, Tachinid parasitiods of Costa Rica, and Phyciodes butterflies)
in the United States and in the tropical regions of 6 Costa Rica (Smith et al. 2007, Hajibabaei
et al. 2006, Wahlberg et al. 2003). DNA barcoding is quickly becoming an important
taxonomic tool by allowing taxonomists, ecologists and conservationists to catalog a variety
of species (insects, birds, etc). Spreading the concept of bioliteracy can promote greater
understanding of the habitats that desperately require conservation and restoration efforts.
Fresh water systems are one of those essential ecosystems because water is an obligatory
resource for human beings.
One very practical application of DNA barcoding is biological monitoring for
assessing water quality. Identification of benthic organisms for biomonitoring purposes
presents a significant cost to those programs, and, as shown by Sweeney at al. 2011, DNA
Barcoding has much to offer. It signaled new possibilities for identification of previously
unidentifiable material in benthic samples. Subsequently, the technique has been gaining
wider adoption by benthic scientists (Holzenthal et al.2010). Geraci et al. 2011 showed how
DNA-barcoding approaches could shed light on an unknown faunain this case the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryotehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryote -
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
7/41
7
Trichoptera of Iraq, and how this method can be used to reveal hidden biodiversity in a poorly
studied region of the world.
A longstanding constraint on use of aquatic macroinvertebrates for environmental
assessments has been the difficulty of identifying them to species, especially in the larval
stages. This task is challenging for even the best taxonomists because species identification
keys for the larval stages of many aquatic macroinvertebrates are incomplete, unreliable, and
nonexistent in some cases (Gresens et al. 2007). This also makes it impossible to identify the
larvae of freshwater species, which are highly threatened taxonomic group and to potentially
shed light on their ecology.
In addition,microscopic indicator species because of their life stage, size, or condition
(i.e., damaged), not only prevents full access to the ecological and evolutionary information
they hold (e.g., physiological mechanisms of pollution tolerance), but also leads to errors and
imprecision in assessments of habitat and water quality (Lenat and Resh, 2001, Stribling et al.
2008, Buchwalter and Luoma, 2005, Buchwalter et al. 2008). To complicate matters, cryptic
species continue to be problematic for aquatic taxonomists (e.g., Funk et al.1988, Sweeney
and Funk, 1991, Sharley et al. 2004, Stahls and Savolainen, 2008, Alexander et al. 2009,
Krosch et al. 2009, Zhou et al. 2010).
The molecular approach can provide a finer resolution than traditional taxonomy for
evaluating environmental change associated with both natural and anthropogenic processes.
Last, Pilgrim et al.2011 illustrated that DNA barcoding is now firmly established as a key
tool for the application of benthic science in environmental protection and regulation and that
national regulatory organizations are taking steps to implement this new technology in their
programs to improve data quantity, quality, and immediacy.
As a consequence of the sensitivity of species to pollution and other disturbances
which alter their habitat, environmental agencies are increasingly choosing biomonitoring
approaches to assess ecosystem status and trends. However, accurate (i.e. avoiding mis-
identification) and consistent (level of taxonomic identification e.g. family/genus/species)
taxon identification has proved difficult to achieve using traditional morphological
approaches. This is particularly true for the large scale application of macroinvertebrates
sampling in river biomonitoring, where larval stages are often difficult or impossible to
identify below the level of taxonomic family.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
8/41
8
In particular, this technology is on its way to being mainstreamed as a fundamental
technique in support of both basic and applied benthic science. Moreover, DNA barcoding has
the potential to take the accuracy and precision of the taxonomy of benthic fauna to an
unprecedented level and to increase the overall level of information associated with key
water-quality metrics (e.g., taxon richness) throughout the world by at least 50%. These
breakthroughs would reverberate at all levels of benthic science, from small, tightly focused
benthic studies on one river or stream reach to large-scale national monitoring programs
involving thousands of streams and rivers.
Comprehensive and systematic analysis of the physico-chemical environmental
complex such as water temperature, Secchi depth, electric conductivity, pH, total dissolved
solids, total solids, total alkalinity, hardness, dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide, dissolved
mineral ions such as Chlorine and Fluorine are significant to the assessment of the ecology of
a natural water body (Ray et al 2009). Therefore, parallel study of these water quality
parameters from the respective spots of collections of these organisms would enable us to
understand the ecological conditions of these insects as well as to assess their value as specific
ecological indicators to pollution status of natural water bodies.
STATE OF THE ART OF THE SUBJECT
In the past seven years, over 1.1 M individuals from about 95,000 species have been
added to the DNA barcode library. This number is not significant in the context of the 1.9 M
known and 10100 M estimated unknown species. Therefore, not only is our characterization
of biodiversity painstakingly slow, but also there is an order-of-magnitude uncertainty in our
best estimate for the totality of Earths biodiversity.
There were earlier studies in India contributing to assessing and monitoring the quality
of water using benthic macro invertebrate fauna, but very little is known about the possibility
of using the DNA barcoding technique for the assessment of water quality. Barcoding, when
combined with traditional aquatic macro invertebrate sampling, provides the most accurate
and cost effective method to determine the water quality of fresh water ecosystems. This
technique help us to gain a greater understanding of how traditional taxonomic approaches
compare to species identification by DNA barcoding and how this may affect interpretation of
water quality.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
9/41
9
The technique eventually provide the knowledge of species diversity, species
composition of unknown faunas, accurate (i.e. avoiding mis-identification) and consistent
(level of taxonomic identification e.g. family/genus/species) taxon identification thereby
shedding light on identification of larval stages and revealing species not currently described
in larval taxonomic keys.
NATIONAL STATUS
There is little available infrastructure for DNA barcoding with aquatic insects in
India and practically little research is happening any where on benthic macro invertebrates.
There is very little understanding by scientists and government officials of the values of this
technology for monitoring water pollution. The little that is known about the species of Indian
aquatic insects and other freshwater macro invertebrates has been acquired mostly by foreign
scientists so that there are no indigenous experts for most of the groups of freshwater insects
and macro invertebrates, and few young scientists are being trained in this field. In Kerala the
diversity of aquatic insects are very high due to low pollution and other suitable
environmental condition for their growth. Since the human population is in an edge of
explosion and other anthropogenic activities are increasing, there is a high possibility of
destruction to the Rivers and thereby leading to the decrease in the diversity of aquatic insects.
Since there is a technical difficulty in long term storage of the intact tissue as such in
preservative medium it is high time that we should maintain a permanent insect library for the
future. So along with the taxonomic identification of benthic macro invertebrates the
technique of DNA barcoding should also be implemented for the most accurate, cost effective
and future storage method to determine the conservation of the insect community before they
get extinct from the face of the Earth.
The only baseline data of Benthic macro invertebrates in India is confined to
classical taxonomical approaches and the phylogenetic characterization (DNA Barcoding) of
benthic macro invertebrates in India is in an initial stage. Since we hardly have any base line
data for Benthic macro invertebrates in India, the project aims to create a new baseline data
(Phylogenetic characterization) of the benthic macro invertebrates of the two rivers of India
based on already available DNA sequence base data information (Barcode of Life databases,
NCBI etc) in support of International studies.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
10/41
10
INTERNATIONAL STATUS
Protocols for using aquatic insects and macro invertebrates to monitor water quality
have been published and implemented in many developed countries, including Australia
(Australian River Assessment System, 2005),Canada(Rosenberg et al. 2005), the European
Union (European Union Water Framework Directive, 2000),New Zealand (Stark et al. 2001),
United Kingdom (RIVPACS, 2005) and the United States (Barbour etal.1999). Progress has
also been toward developing and implementing regionally appropriate protocols in several
Asian countries including China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mongolia, Thailand and Russia
(Morse et al. 2007). The developed countries have an advantage for using this technology
because the world experts for identifying freshwater organisms have lived in these countries
and have studied their respective freshwater biota for many decades.
DNA barcoding technique has become so successful in the area of biodiversity
discovery that it has generated what is currently one of the largest global biodiversity projects
to date (International Barcode of Life project (iBOL, http://www.ibolproject.org/).
In May 2009, a special session titled Environmental Barcoding: Genomic Solutions
for Biomonitoring was held at the North American Benthological Societys (NABS) 57th
annual meeting in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The purpose of this session was to: 1) facilitate an
exchange of ideas between benthic scientists working in the application of DNA barcoding,
and 2) promote wider understanding among other conference attendees of the latest barcoding
technology, especially the improved robustness and accessibility of the technique.
The success of the special session in 2009 was so great that a follow-up interactive
session, titled Barcoding the Benthos: New Vistas in Laboratory, Museum and Field
Science, was held at the NABS meeting in Santa Fe, New Mexico, in June 2010 and was
met with excellent participation from the NABS member community.
The following Universities are involved in the DNA Barcoding techniques for Benthic
macro invertebrates, Environment Canada at Canadian Rivers Institute, University of New
Brunswick, Canada; Stroud Water Research Center, Pennsylvania, USA; University of
Pennsylvania, USA; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Canada; Department of Biology, USA;
Illinois Natural History Survey, USA and Center for Theoretical and Applied Genetics, and
Institute of Marine and Coastal Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
11/41
11
The present study does not take into consideration of life cycle analysis. Only the
aquatic stages are considered for water quality assessment using Biological Water Quality
Criteria developed by CPCB (Table 1). Unlike fish, benthic macro-invertebrates cannot move
around much so they are less able to escape from the impacts of sediment and other pollutants
that diminish the water quality. Therefore, benthic macro-invertebrates can give us reliable
information on river water quality compared to other aquatic fauna (Table 1).
Among all the fresh water invertebrates, only Arthropods, annelids, Molluscs and
Platihelminthes are considered for Biological Water Quality assessment wherein taxonomic
identification is required up to family/genus/species level. For example, Nymphal stage of
Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Odonata, Larval stage of Trichoptera, Diptera and adult stage
of Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Molluscs, Annelida and Platihelminthes are living in water bodies.
However, insects are confined in River Ganga mostly to the shallow reach upto Allahabado
whereas, the deeper reaches from Banaras downstream, population of benthic macro-
invertebrates are dominated by Crustaceans, Molluscs, Annelids and Platyhelminthes. In
view of covering the entire length of River Ganga, all the higher forms of benthic macro-
invertebrates may be included in the study.
Table 1Biological Water Quality Criteria (BWQC)
Sl.No Taxonomic Groups Range ofsaprobicscore
(BMWP)
Range ofdiversityScore
Water qualitycharacteristic Waterqualityclass
IndicatorColour
1 Ephemeroptera,
Plecoptera, Trichoptera,Hemiptera, Diptera
7 and more 0.2 - 1 Clean A Blue
2 Ephemeroptera,
Plecoptera, Trichoptera,Hemiptera, Planaria,
Odonata, Diptera
67 0.5 - 1 Slight Pollution BLightblue
3 Ephemeroptera,Plecoptera, Trichoptera,
Hemiptera, Odonata,
Crustacea, Mollusca,Polychaeta, Diptera
Hirudinea, Oligochaeta
36 0.3 - 0.9Moderate
PollutionC Green
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
12/41
12
4 Mollusca, Hemiptera,
Coleoptera, Diptera,Oligochaeta
25 0.4 &Less
Heavy Pollution D Orange
5 Diptera, OligochaetaNo animals 02 0 - 0.2 Severe Pollution E Red
OBJECTIVES
1. Collection of Ephemeropteran and Odonate larvae from river Pampa of Kerala and
Ganges and identification by conventional taxonomy.
2. Account the important field water quality parameters to assess the ecology of these
species and also to understand the value of each of them as ecological indicators of
pollution status of natural waters
3. Finding out the species composition of a particular riverine ecosystem and how does
the biodiversity change over time, space, and in relation to future environmental
changes.
4. To adopt DNA-barcoding approaches to shed light on unknown faunas and how this
method can be used to reveal hidden biodiversity in a poorly studied region.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The combined morphological and molecular approach provides a finer resolution for
evaluating environmental change associated with both natural and anthropogenic processes
was studied by Bernard et al. 2011. Macro invertebrates were used to assess community
structure and water quality in White Clay Creek, Pennsylvania, USA. A success rate of 98%
were obtained, of the 1617 specimens used for analysis, including small, larvae , and damaged
specimens, were successfully barcoded (sequenced) for the Mitochondrial Cytochrome c
oxidase subunit I gene. A criterion of 2 to 4% genetic divergence provided good separation of
presumptive species. Barcoding revealed species not currently described in larval taxonomic
keys, including multiple (211) coexisting congeneric species. That 150 species were revealed
by barcoding samples collected on the same date and in the same habitat were unprecedented.
The results revealed a pollution-tolerance gap because barcoding pushed larval taxonomy
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
13/41
13
beyond the available pollution-tolerance data. The ability to distinguish larvae at the species
level through barcoding finally puts biodiversity assessments for aquatic communities in
terms comparable to those used for terrestrial ecosystems where estimates of biodiversity for
plants and animals are never quantified at the level of genus or family. The study conclude
that DNA barcodes of stream macro invertebrates will improve descriptions of community
structure and water quality for both ecological and bioassessment purposes.
Another study conducted by Tanya Dapkey, 2008 combines DNA Barcoding and
Macro invertebrate Sampling to Assess Water Quality. The importance of Barcoding, when
combined with traditional aquatic macro invertebrate sampling, provides the most accurate
and cost effective method to determine the water quality of fresh water ecosystems. DNA
barcoding (using a standardized sequence of the mitochondrial CO1 gene) was used to
determine the aquatic insect species richness of two sites along White Clay Creek in
Pennsylvania. Water quality assessment at the sites using the barcoding increased the species
richness and provided a much more detailed analysis by detecting cryptic species. Here
Aquatic insect identifications by an amateur biologist and by expert taxonomists using
traditional methods based on morphology were compared to DNA barcoding. The Amateur
biologists identifications were limited to order and family while expert taxonomists were able
to identify 44 different species and DNA barcoding indicated 128 different species. There was
a success rate of 84% of the 1786 specimens that were submitted for barcoding which
generated a successful DNA sequence. DNA barcoding revealed the presence of more species
than expert taxonomists identified as shown in the following listing of insect orders with
comparison of numbers of species identified by expert taxonomists and DNA barcoding:
Diptera (23 expert spp. and 128 barcoding spp.), Ephemeroptera (6 expert spp. and 16
barcoding spp.), Plecoptera (0 expert spp. and 6 barcoding spp), Trichoptera (9 expert spp.
and 14 barcoding spp), and Coleoptera (6 expert spp. and 6 barcoding spp).
Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for
Biomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos was carried out by Hajibabaei et al. 2011.
The results showed the ability of 454 pyrosequencing of mini-barcodes to accurately identify
all species with more than 1% abundance in the pooled mixture. The approach failed to
identify 6 rare species in the mixture, but the presence of sequences from 9 species that were
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
14/41
14
not represented by individuals in the mixture provides evidence that DNA based analysis may
yet provide a valuable approach in finding rare species in bulk environmental samples.
Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera fauna of Churchill (Manitoba, Canada)
was studied by Xin Zhou et al. 2010. The study showed a >53X increase in the EPT fauna,
including 68 caddis fly, 37 mayfly, and 7 stonefly species, recorded from Churchill. DNA
barcoding also allowed identification of unidentifiable life stages, revealing several potentially
new species of caddisflies and mayflies which suggest the presence of cryptic species. There
study also explore the phenology and habitat preferences of Churchills Trichopteran and
demonstrate that comprehensive sampling is important for documenting biodiversity through
DNA barcoding
Cycles of rainforest contraction and expansion of north-eastern Australians dry
sclerophyll forest associated with climatic fluctuations leads to geographical endemism in
terrestrial rainforest taxa. The study was conducted by Matt et al2009. The Australian non-
biting midge species Echinocladius martini Cranston (Diptera: Chironomidae), restricted to
cool, well-forested freshwater streams, was found to disperse among populations located in
isolated rainforest pockets during periods of sclerophyllous forest expansion. In this study,
mitochondrial COI were analyzed for E. martini collected from eight sites spanning the Wet
Tropics bioregion to assess the scale and extent of phylogeographic structure. Analyses of
genetic structure showed several highly divergent cryptic lineages (
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
15/41
15
METHODOLOGY
The basic methodologies involved are
1. Collection and Identification and preservation of Ephemeropteran and Odonate larval
samples from the river Pampa of Kerala and river Ganges
2. Assessment of field water quality parameters using a water analysis kit (APHA, 1995)
3. DNA Isolation from the preserved samples.
4. Polymerase Chain Reaction and DNA Sequencing of the COI gene.
5. DNA Sequencing, Sequence Editing and Alignment of the COI gene.
1. Collection, Identification and preservation of Ephemeropteran and Odonate larval
samples from the river Pampa of Kerala and river Ganges.
Benthic (bottom dwelling) larvae will be collected and identified from river Pampa of Keralaand river Ganga from the point of river origin to the discharge. Collection methods include the
use of benthic nets (D net) and kick screens. Using the stream current, to wash specimens
physically from substrates, and examination of stone, wood and other substrates to find the
attached larvae and pupae. Identification of specimens to the most refined taxonomic level
possible will commence immediately after the collection with the help of keys for
identification. The sampling locations on River Pampa will be Pulachimalai Hills,
Sannidhanam, Madamon, Kozhencherry, Aranmula, Mannar and Viapuram. The
Pulachimalai hills is situated in forest area devoid of any anthropogenic activities. Reference
location will be at Pulachimalai.The Ganga basin accounts for a little more than one fourth
(26.3 %) of the countrys total geographical area and is the biggest river basin in India,
covering the entire states of Uttarakhand , Uttar Pradesh , Bihar , Delhi, parts of Punjab,
Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal. The main river
stream originates in the northern most part of Uttarakhand flows through Uttar Pradesh, Bihar
and West Bengal and finally drains into the Bay of Bengal. Rising from the icy caves of
Gangotri glacier at the height of 4255 above mean sea level, River Ganga starts its long
journey to join River Alaknanda and becomes River Ganga near Devprayag. River Ganga is
the longest river (2,525 km) and has largest river basin (861,404 km2) in India. The main
stretch of River Ganga runs from Haridwar to Allahabad through over Nagal, Bijnor,
Garhmukteshwar, Hasanpur, Anupshahar, Narora, Sahaswan, Kasgang, Ptiali, Kampil,Kaimgang, Fatehgarh, Kannauj, Bithaur, Brahmavart, Kanpur and finally Allahabad. At
Allahabad, it joins with a major tributary River Yamuna and thereafter passing through
Banaras, Patna. At Ganga Sagar in West Bengal, it joins Bay of Bengal. Following sampling
locations have been selected on River Ganga. Reference location will be at Gangotri.
1 Gangotri
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
16/41
16
1. Haridwar
2. Nagal
3. Bijnor
4. Garhmukteshwar
5. Hasanpur
6. Anupshahar
7. Narora
8. Sahaswan
9. Kasgang
10. Ptiali
11.Kampil
12.Kaimgang
13.Fatehgarh
14.Kannauj
15.Bithaur
16.Brahmavart
17.Kanpur
18.Allahabad
19.Banaras
20.Patna
21.Ganga Sagar
In the first phase, Main River Pamba and River Ganga will be considered from origin to
discharge. The frequency of sampling will be in three different season. For River Ganga,
sampling will be carried out during Post-monsoon (Octobr-November), Winter (January-
February) and Summer (May-June). At Reference station sampling will be restricted to Post-
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
17/41
17
monsoon and summer season. For River Pamba, sampling will be carried out during Post-
monsoon (October-November), Winter (December-February) and Summer (April-June).
2. Specimen Preservation.
To allow DNA isolation, 95% ethanol should be used. The ethanol should generally be
poured off and replaced with new 95% ethanol within a few days of collection to optimize
DNA preservation. DNA has been successfully extracted from formalin-preserved tissue,
including relatively ancient samples and these techniques may be important in examining
previously archived specimens (Fang et al. 2002; France and Kocher, 1996)
3. DNA Isolation
Whole cell DNA was extracted from either fresh tissue immediately after collection of a
specimen or from tissue frozen at - 20C or other preserved samples (Ethanol). DNA from the
CO1 gene is extracted, amplified and sequenced through a set of six protocols viz
Lysis
DNA Extraction
PCR
Sequence Editing and Alignment
For isolation of DNA from the benthic insects we should first standardize the protocol
either manually (Standard barcoding protocols for DNA extraction (Ivanova et al.2006)] orby Kit procedures available. For the manual isolation of DNA from the specimens the
following steps are followed
General Manual Steps for DNA isolation
Lysis and DNA Extraction
1.Mix 5 ml of insect Lysis Buffer and 0.5 ml of Proteinase K, 20 mg/ml in a sterile container.
Add 50 l of Lysis Mix to each Eppendorf tubes.
2.DNA is isolated from a piece of each specimen (a leg for most insects, posterior parapods
for chironomid Diptera, or a piece of body tissue for other dipteran insects, oligochaetes,
crustaceans, and snails).
3. Add a small amount of tissue (e.g. 2-4 mm of insect leg or 2-3 mm3 of ethanol preserved
tissue) to each Eppendorf tubes.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
18/41
18
4. Incubate at 56C for a minimum of 6 hours or overnight to allow digestion.
5. Centrifuge at 1500 g for 15 sec for proper mixing of the samples.
6. Add 100 l of Binding Mix to each sample using micro pipette and centrifuge at 1000 g
for 20 sec.
7. Transfer the lysate (about 150 l) from the Eppendorf tubes into a tube containing GF
membrane.
8. Centrifuge at 5000 g for 5 min to bind DNA to the GF membrane.
9. First wash step: Add 180 l of Protein Wash Buffer (PWB) to each tube containing GF
membrane and centrifuge at 5000 g for 2 min.
10.Second wash step: Add 750 l of Wash Buffer (WB) to each tube containing GF
membrane and centrifuge at 5000 g for 5 min.
11.Remove the GF membrane and incubate at 56C for 30 min to evaporate residual ethanol.
12.Collect the DNA eluted from the GF membrane and is resuspended using 30 60 l of
ddH20 (prewarmed to 56C) into a vial and incubate at room temperature for 1 min.
13.DNA can be temporarily stored at 4C or at20C for long-term storage and further use.
Kit Procedures Available
Total genomic DNA was extracted from larval tissue using the Qiagen DNeasy extraction
kit, following the manufacturers guidelines.
In addition to standard methods, there are commercial kits (e.g. Sigma-Aldrich product
number GDI-3) that are inexpensive and have high success in recovering DNA.
The Genomic DNA isolated by this procedure contains an approximately 700 base pair
(bp) barcoding region of the Mitochondrial Cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene. The
next step is to amplify and sequence the gene using standard barcoding protocols (Ivanova et
al. 2006). Broad range primers are available that will amplify an approximately 700-bp
segment from diverse invertebrates (including Annelida, Arthropoda, Coelenterata,
Echinodermata, Echiura, Mollusca, Nemertina, Platyhelminthes, Pogonophora, Sipuncula, andTardigrada) (Folmer et al.1994)
Polymerase Chain Reaction and DNA Sequencing
Most eukaryote cells contain mitochondria,and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has a
relatively fast mutation rate, which results in significant variation in mtDNA sequences
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryotehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryote -
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
19/41
19
between species and, in principle, a comparatively small variance within species. A 648-bp
region of the mitochondrial Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was proposed as a
potential 'barcode'
The COI gene was used for this analysis as it is fast evolving and thus is considered to
be an optimal marker for intraspecific population analysis (Avise 1986; Moriyama & Powell
1997). A 639-base pair (bp) fragment of the Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was
amplified using universal invertebrate COI primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 (Folmer et al.
1994).
Full-length COI barcodes were amplified using the M13-tailed versions of the Folmer
primers:
LCO1490-t1 (59TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTGGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-39)
HCO2198-t1 (59-CAGGAAACAGCTATGACTAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-39)
Poly LCO and Poly HCO primers were used when full-length polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) amplification was not successful (Carr 2010).
Primers play a very important role in the PCR reaction steps. The primers are some
times common or may be specific depending upon the specimens selected. We have to
standardize the annealing temperature for each reaction. The amount of DNA used will
depend on the concentration of the sample. The COI amplification reaction mix contains 41.5
l of template DNA from extractions, 0.5 l of 10 M Primer (5 pmol), 4.5 l of 10X PCR
Buffer, 2.5 l of 50 mM MgCl2 (2.5 mM), 0.25 l of 10 mM dNTP, 0.2 l Taqpolymerase
and were adjusted to a final volume of 50 l with dH2O.
Steps for COI amplification (Polymerase Chain Reaction)
Step 1 is an initial 94C soak to completely denature the original template, particularly
if it is genomic DNA.
Step 2 is the denaturing step.
Step 3 is the annealing step whose temperature will depend on the sequence of the
primers. For COI, it is ideal to begin annealing at a low temperature (45C) for a few
initial cycles to allow the primers to bind to the template and then raise the
temperature (51C) to avoid excessive non-specific binding of primers.
Step 4 is the extension step whose time depends on the length of the product.
Generally, extension steps should be at least 1 min/1000 bp.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_pairhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrialhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytochrome_c_oxidasehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytochrome_c_oxidasehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrialhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_pair -
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
20/41
20
Step 5 repeats steps 2, 3, and 4 five more times.
Steps 6, 7, 8, and 9 denature, anneal at 51C, and extend for 36 cycles.
Step 10 is a soak at 72C that will allow the Taq polymerase to complete any
unfinished products.
Step 11 is a 4C soak for 10 min.
Cloning of COI gene into a suitable host bacteria for further studies
The amplified COI gene sequence has to be cloned into a suitable vector and introduction
into host bacteria for further studies.
DNA Sequencing, Sequence Editing and Alignment
The amplified PCR products were examined using 2% Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
(AGE) and the amplified COI gene present in the gel is imaged using an Alpha Imager .
Successful PCR products were sent for cycle sequencing. The cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
sequences generated after the DNA sequencing were aligned and edited by using software
called bioedit (Hall, 1999). Edited sequences were aligned using software known as BLAST
and uploaded onto the Barcode of Life Datasystems (BOLD) website
(http://www.barcodinglife.com/) or NCBI (http://www.ncbi.com). Sequences and detailed
information about all specimens are stored on Gen-Bank and are publicly accessible to all. A
phylogenetic Analysis Tree (Dendrogram) drawn after the process will create a library of
DNA barcodes that will link existing Linnaean names and ecological information associated
with them to barcode sequences we submit. This signals new possibilities for identification of
previously unidentifiable material in benthic samples and also about the species diversity,
composition and richness.
Reference
Alexander, L. C., M. Delion, D. J. Hawthorne, W. O. Lamp, And D. H. Funk. 2009.Mitochondrial lineages and DNA barcoding of closely related species in the mayfly
genus 2011] Dna Barcoding Of Stream Macroinvertebrates 213 Ephemerella
(Ephemeroptera:Ephemerellidae). Journal of the North American Benthological
Society 28:584 595.
http://www.barcodinglife.com/http://www.ncbi.com/http://www.ncbi.com/http://www.barcodinglife.com/ -
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
21/41
21
APHA, 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association/ Water
Pollution Control Federation, Washington DC
Bernard W. Sweeney and Donald J. Baird, 2011, Applying DNA barcoding inbenthology: the state of the science. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 2011, 30(1):122124
Buchwalter, D. B., And S. N. Luoma. 2005. Differences in dissolved cadmium andzinc uptake among stream insects: mechanistic explanations. Environmental Science
and Technology 39:498504.
Buchwalter, D. B., D. J. Cain, C. A. Martin, L. Xie, S. N. Luoma, And T. Garland.2008. Aquatic insect ecophysiological traits reveal phylogenetically based differences
in dissolved cadmium susceptibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 105:83218326.
Chapman AD. 2009. Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World: A Reportfor the Australian Biological Resources Study. Toowoomba.
Fang SG, Wan QH, Fijihara N. 2002. Formalin removal from archival tissue by criticalpoint drying. BioTechniques 33:604-611.
France SC, Kocher TD. 1996. DNA sequencing of formalin-fixed crustaceans fromarchival research collections. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 5:304-313.
Folmer, M. Black, W. Hoeh,* R. Lutz, and R. Vrijenhoek+ 1994 DNA primers for
amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoaninvertebrates.Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology (1994) 3(5), 294-299
Funk, D. H., And B. W. Sweeney. 1990. Electrophoretic analysis of speciesboundaries and phytogenetic relationships of taeniopterygid stoneflies (Plecoptera).
Transactions of the American Entomological Society 116:727751
Funk, D. H., B. W. Sweeney, And R. L. Vannote. 1988. Electrophoretic study ofEastern North American Eurylophella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae) with the
discovery of morphologically cryptic species. Annals of the Entomological Society of
America 81:174186.
Geraci, C. J., M. A. Al-Saffar, And X. Zhou. 2011. DNA barcoding facilitatesdescription of unknown faunas: a case study on Trichoptera in the headwaters of theTigris River, Iraq. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:163173.
Gresens, S. E., K. T. Belt, J. A. Tang, D. C. Gwinn, And P. A. Banks. 2007. Temporaland spatial responses of Chironomidae (Diptera) and other benthic invertebrates tourban stormwater runoff. Hydrobiologia 575:173190.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
22/41
22
Hall T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor andanalysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT.Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 958.
Hajibabaei, Mehrdad, Daniel H. Janzen, John M. Burns, Winnie Hallwachs and Paul
D. N. Hebert. 2006. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera.Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
103(4): 968-971.
Hebert, P. D. N., A. Cywinska, S. L. Ball, And J. R. Dewaard. 2003. Biologicalidentifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London
Series B:Biological Sciences270:313321.
Holzenthal, R. W., D. R. Robertson, S. U. Pauls, And P. K. Mendez. 2010. Taxonomyand systematics: contributions to benthology and J-NABS. Journal of the North
American Benthological Society 29:147169.
IBOL (INTERNATIONAL BARCODE OF LIFE). 2010. Official launch of iBOLactivates worlds largest biodiversity genomics project. Biodiversity Institute of
Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. (Available from:http://ibol.org/official-launch/)
Ivanova, N. V., J. R. Dewaard, And P. D. N. Hebert. 2006. An inexpensive,automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Molecular EcologyNotes 6: 9981002.
Jackson, J. K., And V. H. Resh. 1992. Variation in genetic structure among
populations of the caddisfly Helicopsyche borealis from three streams in northernCalifornia, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 27:2942.
Jackson, J. K., And V. H. Resh. 1992. Variation In Genetic Structure Amongpopulations of the caddisfly Helicopsyche borealis from three streams in northernCalifornia, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 27:2942.
Janzen, D. H. 2004. Now is the Time. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal SocietyLondon,B DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1444.
Krosch, M. N., A. M. Baker, B. G. Mckie, P. B. Mather, And P. S. Cranston. 2009.
Deeply divergent mitochondrial lineages reveal patterns of local endemism inChironomids of the Australian Wet Tropics. Austral Ecology 34: 317328.
Lenat, D. R., And V. H. Resh. 2001. Taxonomy and stream ecology: the benefits ofgenus- and species-level identifications. Journal of the North American Benthological
Society 20:287298.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
23/41
23
Marshall E. 2005. Will DNA bar codes breathe life into classification? Science 307:1037.
Matt N. Krosch, Andrew M. Baker, Brendan G. Mckie, Peter B. Mather And Peter S.Cranston. 2009. Deeply divergent mitochondrial lineages reveal patterns of local
endemism in chironomids of the Australian Wet Tropics.Austral Ecology 34, 317328
Mehrdad Hajibabaei1, Shadi Shokralla, Xin Zhou, Gregory A. C. Singer, Donald J.Baird. 2011. Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach forBiomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos. PLoS ONE 6(4): e17497.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017497
Pfenninger, M., C. Nowak, K. C. Steinke, And B. Streit. 2007. Utility of DNAtaxonomy and barcoding for the inference of larval community structure in
morphologically cryptic Chironomus (Diptera) species. Molecular Ecology 16:1957
1968.
Pilgrim, E. M., S. A. Jackson, S. Swenson, I. Turcsanyi, E. Friedman, L. Weigt, AndM. J. Bagley. 2011. Incorporation of DNA barcoding into a large-scale biomonitoring
program: opportunities and pitfalls. Journal of the North American BenthologicalSociety 30: 217231.
Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN.2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System(www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes 7: 355364
Ray J G, Krishnan J., Unni K. S. and Shobha V., (2009) Physico-chemicalenvironmental complex of a commercially exploited tropical freshwater system within
a wildlife sanctuary, Kerala, India. Ecology and Noospherology, 20: (3-4): 124-144.http://uenj.cv.ua/Ecology_and_noospherology_2009_20_3-4/Rey2.pdf
.
Sharley, D. J., V. Pettigrove, And Y. M. Parsons. 2004. Molecular identification ofChironomus spp. (Diptera) for biomonitoring of aquatic ecosystems. AustralianJournal of Entomology 43:359365.
Smith, M. Alex, D. Monty Wood, Daniel H. Janzen, Winnie Hallwachs, and Paul D.N. Hebert. 2007. DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropicalparasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proceedings of the
Natural Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (12): 4967-4972.
Stahls, G., And E. Savolainen. 2008. MtDNA COI barcodes reveal crytic diversity inthe Baetis vernus group (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Molecular Phylogenetics andEvolution 46:8287.
Stribling, J. B., K. L. Pavlik, S. M. Holdsworth, And E. W. Leppo. 2008. Data quality,performance, and uncertainty in taxonomic identification for biological assessments.
Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 906919.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
24/41
24
Sweeney, B. W., And D. H. Funk. 1991. Population genetics of the burrowing mayflyDolania americana: Geographic variation and the presence of a cryptic species.
Aquatic Insects 13:1727.
Sweeney, B. W., J. M. Battle, J. K. Jackson, And T. Dapkey. 2011. Can DNAbarcodes of stream macroinvertebrates improve descriptions of community structure
and water quality? Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:195216.
Tanya Dapkey, 2008. Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania inPartial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Environmental
Studies.
Wahlberg, Niklas, Rita Oliveira, and James A. Scott. 2003. Phylogenetic relationshipsof Phyciodes butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): complex mtDNA
variation and species delimitation. Systematic Entomology. 28: 1-17.
Wilson EO.1985. Time to Revive Systematics. Science 230: 1227.
Xin Zhou, Luke M. Jacobus, R. Edward DeWalt, Sarah J. Adamowicz, and Paul D. N.Hebert. 2010. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera fauna of Churchill(Manitoba, Canada): insights into biodiversity patterns from DNA barcoding Journal
of the North American Benthological Society, 29(3):814-837. 2010.
Zhou, X., K. M. Kjer, And J. C. Morse. 2007. Associating larvae and adults of ChineseHydropsychidae caddisflies (Insecta:Trichoptera) using DNA sequences. Journal of
the North American Benthological Society 26: 719742.
Zhou, X., L. M. Jacobus, R. E. Dewalt, S. J. Adamowicz, And P. D. N. Hebert. 2010.Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera fauna of Churchill (Manitoba, Canada):
insights into biodiversity patterns from DNA barcoding. Journal of the North
American Benthological Society 29: 814837.
Zhou, X., S. J. Adamowicz, L. M. Jacobus, R. E. Dewalt, And P. D. N. Hebert. 2009.Towards a comprehensive barcode library for artic life Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera,
and Trichoptera of Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. Frontiers in Zoology 6:30.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
25/41
25
WORK PLAN
First Year
First half (6 months)
The study is selected for three years. A total of 2 Holy Rivers, Pampa from the
Southern Kerala and river Ganga from North India should be taken showing high diversity of
aquatic insects.
Procurement of equipments, chemicals, glass wares etc, setting up of laboratory,
reference collection, visits and selection of sites, design of field and laboratory work.
Second half (6 months)
Taxonomical identification and Preservation of Insects. Insects should be collected
from 20 different sites oftwo rivers(Pampa and Ganga).
Second Year
First half (6 months)
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
26/41
26
Isolation of the DNA from the Benthic Samples collected from the two Rivers and
Standardization of the isolation Protocol. We can either isolate the DNA manually or by using
Kit procedures.
The DNA obtained after the isolation procedure should be given for PCR reactions.
Amplification of the isolated DNA fragment is done with the help of Primers and
standardization of the annealing temperature for the PCR reaction should be carried out for
specific amplification of the desired gene of interest.
Second half (6 months)
The amplified gene of interest will be given for sequencing, comparison of the sequence will be
done with the help of Bio-Informatics tool such as BLAST and Bio-edit and the data will be
submitted to National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) or Barcode of Life
Database (BOLD). The result obtained should be compared and the species diversity,
establishing DNA library and thereby biomonitoring of the water quality will be achieved
Preparation of Project report, Submission and presentation. Publication of Manuscript in
Research Journals.
PERT CHART
FIRST YEAR
Work Plan Duration
Lab Setting, Site fixing, Collection of
Aquatic insects from the two rivers (Pampa
and Ganga) of India.
Duration=6 months
Taxonomical identification and
Preservation of Insects. assessment of
water quality
Duration
Duration=6 months
SECOND YEAR
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
27/41
27
Work Plan Duration
DNA isolation,
Amplification of the isolated DNA with the
help of universal Primers for COI
Duration=6
months
. The amplified gene of interest will be
given for sequencing, comparing the
sequence with the help of Bio-Informatics
tool such as BLAST and Bio-edit and
submitting the data to NCBI or BOLD ,
paper publication and project winding up
Duration
Duration=6
months
Practical relevance or utility of the project
1) Data gathered during the proposed project would be useful as a sound data for
researchers, Taxonomist, Scientists, conservationists and development agencies.
2) Data on DNA Barcoding would be useful to compare with the baseline data
gathered by the Taxonomist for the species level classification.
3) Data collected during the proposed project would be useful for implementing
measures for conservation of endangered species and species composition of
unknown faunas and identification of larval forms of benthic aquatic insects,
which are very difficult for identification.
4) Data will give a biological indication about the pollution status of the river.
Agencies, which can utilize the results of the project
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
28/41
28
This project is expected to reveal fruitful data which would be directly useful for
researchers, various government departments, administrators and conservationists.
Accordingly, a list of users of the results of the project is drawn as follows:
1. Research students
2. Scientists
3. Taxonomist
4. School and university Teachers
5. Science Popularization movements and agencies
6. Government agencies like Department of Forests, Department of Science,
Technology and Environment.
7. Administrators.
8. National and International, Development Research and Consultancy
Agencies.
9. Forest and wild life extension workers Conservationists
Statement V
Project budget in the prescribed forma1
Particulars NoI Year
(in Rupees)
II Year
(in Rupees)total
A Salaries & Wages*
Junior Research Fellow(JRF) 2 3,36,000 3,36,000
Total 672,000
[*The monthly salary [email protected],000/-]
B
Major and minor equipments
Multi-parameter Portable Water Analysis Kit: 300,000.00
C Expendables
1.Chemicals 1,00,000 200,000 3,00,000
2.Glassware (including Plastic wares) 50,000 50,000 100,000
3.Stationaries 10,000 10,000 20,000
Total 4,20,000
D Travel
1. Travel and Field work 2,00,000 50,00,0 5 250,000
mailto:[email protected],000/-mailto:[email protected],000/- -
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
29/41
29
0
,00
0
E Other Project costs
1.Books 8,000 - - 8,000F Contingencies
1. Analytical charges. 100,000 1,00,000
2.Contingent expenses 50,000 100,000 150,000
Total
Total 19,00000
Institutional Overhead 100,000
Grand total Rs 20,00000 ( Rupees Twenty lakhs only)
Statement VI
Facilities available with the host institutionOptical Stereo MicroscopeThermo cycler (PCR)
Deep-freezer (-200C)
Refrigerator Centrifuge
Gel Documentation system
Micropipettes
Weigh balance
Water bath
AGE Apparatus
Justification of the budget proposal
A. Salaries and Wages (Man power)
Salary for two project fellows (Two scholar having post graduate in Biotechnology with
experience in the field of Classical taxonomy and molecular taxonomy)
B. EquipmentsFor analyzing water quality in the field itself
C. Expendables/ConsumablesDNA isolation process needed costly chemicals having quality grade particularly
Sigma, Merck etc.
D. Travel
During the period of study, visit of concerned offices/ Departments in and outside the
State for data collection and sample collection along entire the major rivers in Kerala is
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
30/41
30
required. For meeting the traveling fare for this purpose and throughout the study area in
different periods, an amount of Rs 250,000 (Two lakhs fifty thousand only) is proposed.
E. Books and Journals
To purchase books and journals related to research works for procuring update works
in this field.
F. Contingency
Department of Biosciences does not have automated sequencing facility for DNA
sequencing. So the samples have to be sent to another well equipped laboratory having DNA
sequencing facilities.
ANNEXURE II (E): CERTIFICATE
To:
Central Pollution Control Board,
Parivesh Bhawan,
East Arjun Nagar,
Delhi-110 032
Sir,
1. A research project entitled,
DNA Barcoding of Freshwater Ephemeropterans and Odonates Important in Water
Quality Assessment of Two Indian Riversis forwarded herewith for consideration of grant funding by the Ministry.
2. It is certified that the same project or another project with similar objectives has not
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
31/41
31
been submitted to any other funding agency by the Investigator(s).
3. We have carefully read the terms and conditions of sanctioning the project and agree to
abide by them.4. The organization will provide all necessary infrastructural facilities (both laboratory and
Administrative) if the project is sanctioned.
5. The organization is fully responsible in regard to matters pertaining to the project.6. Certified that the equipment/instruments proposed in the project are available in theDepartment/Institution and are available for dedicated project use.
Yours faithfully,
Place:
Date:
(Registrar/Director/Head of the Organization)
1. Principal Investigator
Dr.Linu Mathew
Assistant Professor in BiotechnologySchool of Biosciences
Mahatma Gandhi UniversityPD Hills (PO), Kottayam
Ph. 09447505690
E mail:[email protected]
Co- Investigators
1 Dr. J. G. Ray M Sc, M E & E, Ph D
Professor,School of BiosciencesMahatma Gandhi UniversityPD Hills (PO), Kottayam
Ph. 09446119626E mail:[email protected] ,[email protected]
2 Dr. Prathima AkolkarScientist D
Head, In- charge, Biolab,
Central Pollution Control Board,Parivesh Bhawan,
East Arjun Nagar,
Delhi-110 032
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
32/41
32
Ph. 09818146122
E mail:[email protected]
Curriculam Vitae of principal Investigator
Dr. Linu Mathew
Assistant professor (Sr.grade) w/o Binoi Antony
school of Biosciences Pichakapallil
Mahatma Gandhi University Amalagiri P O
Priyadarshini Hills P O Kottayam-36
Keralam-686 560 Keralam
[email protected] 0481 2591790
9447505690
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
33/41
33
Educational Qualifications
Degree Board Subjects YearMark(%)
Class/Rank
S. S. L. C. State Board of
PublicExaminations
Basic Sciences,
Languages
1990 94 Distinction
Pre- Degree MahatmaGandhiUniversity
Physics, Chemistry,Biology, English, Hindi
1992 82 First Class
BSc.(Agriculture)
KeralaAgriculturalUniversity
Agronomy, Horticulture,Plant Pathology,Entomology, Genetics,Plant Breeding
1997 93 Distinction
MSc.Biotechnology
TamilnaduAgriculturalUniversity
Genetic Engineering,Molecular Biology,Enzymology,Biochemistry
1999 96 First Rankwithdistinction
Ph. D. inBiotechnology
MahatmaGandhiUniversity
2008
Title of the thesis
Studies on the anticancer effects of Cassia fistula L.
Areas of Interests
Plant Tissue Culture, DNA barcoding
Scholarships
1. Mahatma Gandhi University Merit Scholarship based on S. S. L. C. marks from 1990-
1992
2. Kerala Agricultural University Merit scholarship from 1992-1996
3. D. B. T. Scholarship from 1997-1999
4. CSIR. JRF and NET in the year 1998
Merit Awards
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
34/41
34
M. S. Swaminathan Award for the best student in Biotechnology for the year 1999 of
Centre for Plant Molecular Biology, TNAU
Teaching Experience
Teaching Biotechnology at PG level since 26 March, 2001 till date. (11 yearsexperience)
Publications
a) Papers Published
1Linu Mathew, R. Chandra Babu, J. Souframanien, P. Chezhian, P. Shanmugasundaram, P.
Nagarajan and S. Sadashivam, (2000), DNA Polymorphism among Rice (Oryza sativa L. )
accessions differing in draught tolerance, J. Plant Biol, Vol 27 (2) pp 145-152
2 Linu Mathew, Sankar Sashidhar, Chemopreventive potential of methanol extract of stem
bark of Cassia fistula in mice,Journal of pharmacognosy and herbal formulations,vol2
,2012,(ISSN2229-6840)
b) Paper presented at conferences
1 Micropropagation and secondary metabolite isolation from Adahthoda vassica
Nees ,Rashmi PA, Reshma John, Linu Mathew ,Kerala women,s science congress
august 2010
2 Endophytic associations in Neem Plants (Azadirachta indica A juss.)in KeralaPreethy MR, Jyothis Mathew, Linu Mathew 2010
3Genetic variation in populations of Clarias dussumieri dussumieri in differentgeographical locations of Kerala Aneesha devassi, Smitha Thomas, Linu MathewWorld congress on biotechnology,2011
4 Genetic variation in populations of Monochoria vaginalis in different geographicalareas of coastal Kerala, Smitha thomas. K., Aneesha devassy and Linu Mathew,World congress on biotechnology,2011
5 Endophytic fungal diversity and colonization in Achyranthes asperaLinn. Reshma
John, Siji Raju, Jyothis Mathew, Liinu Mathew 24th Kerala Science Congress,
KSCSTE, Thiruvanthapuram 2012
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
35/41
35
6 Studies on endophytic associations in Achyranthes aspera . Reshma John, Siji
Raju, Jyothis Mathew, Liinu Mathew, International congress and symposium in plant
sciences,at MACFAST ,Thiruvalla, Kerala 2011
c) Gene Bank Accessions
1 ACCESSION JQ699184 Aneesha,D.,Linu,M.,Padmakumar,K.G.,
Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 568 bp DNA
linearVRT28-FEB-2012
DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP1 16S ribosomal RNA gene,
partialsequence;mitochondrial.
SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
2 ACCESSION JQ699184 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 568 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP1 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partialsequence; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
3 ACCESSION JQ699185 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K., Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 568 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP2 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial
sequence; mitochondrial. .SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish).
4 ACCESSION JQ699186 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 568 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP3 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial
sequence; mitochondrial. .SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)ORGANISM Clarias gariepinus
.
5 ACCESSION JQ699191 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 573 bp DNAlinear VRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT3 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partialsequence; mitochondrial.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
36/41
36
SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
6 ACCESSION JQ699192 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K. 573 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012
DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT4 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partialsequence; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
7 ACCESSION JQ699193 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 573 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012
DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT5 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partialsequence; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
8 ACCESSION JQ699194 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 568 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU1 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partialsequence; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias dussumieri
9 ACCESSION JQ699195 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K., Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 568 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU2 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partialsequence; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias dussumieri
10 ACCESSION JQ699196 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K., Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 568 bp DNAlinear VRT 28-FEB-2012 DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU3 16Sribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; mitochondrial. SOURCE mitochondrionClarias dussumieri
11 ACCESSION JQ699197 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K., Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 568 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-201
DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU4 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partialsequence; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias dussumieri
12 ACCESSION JQ699198 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 568 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
37/41
37
DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU5 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partialsequence; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias dussumieri
13 ACCESSION JQ699199 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K. 671 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP1 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
14 ACCESSION JQ699200 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K., Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K. 671 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP2 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)
gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish )
15 ACCESSSION JQ699201 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 671 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP3 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
16 ACCESSION JQ699202Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 671 bp DNAlinear VRT 28-FEB-2012 DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP4cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
17 ACCESSION JQ699203 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 671 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP5 cytochrome oxidase subunit I(COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
18 ACCESSION JQ699204 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 660 bp DNA linear VRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT1 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
38/41
38
SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
19 ACCESSION JQ699205 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 660 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012
DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT2 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
20 ACCESSION JQ699206 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 660 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT3 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
21 ACCESSION JQ699207 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 660 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT4 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
22 ACCESSSION JQ699208 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 660 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT5 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
23 ACCESSION JQ699209 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 662 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU1 cytochrome oxidase subunit I(COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias dussumieri
24 ACCESSION JQ699210 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 662 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU2 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias dussumieri
25 ACCESSION JQ699211 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 662 bp DNA linear
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
39/41
39
VRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU3 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias dussumieri
26 ACCESSION JQ699212 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 662 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU4 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias dussumieri
27 ACCESSION JQ699213 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 662 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias dussumieri isolate CLDU5 cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)
gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias dussumieri
28ACCESSION JQ699214 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 578 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP1 cytochrome b (Cytb) gene, partialcds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
29 ACCESSION JQ699215Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 578 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP2 cytochrome b (Cytb) gene, partialcds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
30 ACCESSION JQ699216 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 578 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
31 ACCESSION JQ699217 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 578 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012 DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP4 cytochrome b (Cytb)gene, partial cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
40/41
40
32 ACCESSION JQ699218Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 578 bp DNA linearVRT 28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias gariepinus isolate CLGP5 cytochrome b (Cytb) gene, partialcds; mitochondrial.
SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias gariepinus (North African catfish)
33 ACCESSION JQ699219Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 578 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT1 cytochrome b (Cytb) gene, partial cds;mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
34 ACCESSSION JQ699220 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 578 bp DNA linear VRT
28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT2 cytochrome b (Cytb) gene, partial cds;mitochondrial. SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
35 ACCESSION JQ699221 Aneesha,D., Linu,M., Padmakumar,K.G.,Gopalakrishnan,A., Raj,K.,Basheer,V.S. and Jena,J.K 578 bp DNA linear VRT28-FEB-2012DEFINITION Clarias batrachus isolate CLBT3 cytochrome b (Cytb) gene, partial
cds; mitochondrial.SOURCE mitochondrion Clarias batrachus (walking catfish)
Workshops and Seminar attended
1. Workshop on recombinant DNA Technology conducted by CFBTR, Madurai. (21-12-
2002 to 31-02-2002)
2. 3 Day Seminar cum Workshop on Animal Cell Culture in School of Medical Education,
M. G. U., Gandhi Nagar, from 03-11-03 to 05-11-03
3. UGC Sponsored orientation Course from 14-10-04 to 10-11-04 at Bharathiar
University
4. Workshop on Statistical Applications in Research Studies By School of Environmental
Sciences, M. G. U. from 20-07-04 to 25-07-04
5. UGC Sponsored Refresher Course on Life Sciences by CUSAT from 19-02-07 to 10-
03-07
-
7/27/2019 Dna Barcoding2 1 Revised
41/41
6. National Seminar on Biosciences from 14-02-07to 15-02-07 organized by School of
Biosciences , M. G. U.
7. (convenor ) National seminar series in connection with Birth Bicentenary of Charles
Darwin) at School of Biosciences
8. National seminar on Role of women in climate change at KSCSTE
Thiruvananthapuram Jan 2010
9. Kerala Womens Science Congress August 2010
10. Workshop on Plant DNA barcoding at CMS college, Kottayam, MG University
December 2011
11. National Seminar on Life style and Diseases
Ongoing Research Programmes
1. Production of phytoecdysones from callus cultures ofAchyranthes aspera.
2. Micropropagation and Molecular Characterization of Somaclones ofAdathoda
vassica.
3. Micropropagation and Molecular characterization of Boerrhavia diffusafrom different
Geographical areas.
4. Molecular Characterization of Brackish water fauna of Vembanadu Lake..
Projects
Principal investigator in the KSCSTE funded major research Project Barcoding and
genetic diversity Analysis of Clarias Spp of Kerala (ongoing)
Declaration
The information give above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
LINU MATHEW