1 HPC Winter Weather Desk Operations and Upcoming NCEP Model Changes Dan Petersen NROW Conference...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 HPC Winter Weather Desk Operations and Upcoming NCEP Model Changes Dan Petersen NROW Conference...
1
HPC Winter Weather Desk Operations and Upcoming NCEP
Model Changes
Dan PetersenNROW Conference Nov. 4, 2009
With contributions from David Novak and Keith Brill
2
HPC Winter Weather DeskHPC Winter Weather DeskOverviewOverview
Internal deterministic 6-h snow/ sleet/ ZR accumulation grids & graphics
Heavy Snow and Ice Discussion (QPFHSD)
Public products of 24-h exceedance probabilities for:
Snow/Sleet: 4,8,12 in.Freezing Rain: 0.25 in.Probabilities computed from deterministic forecast and model spread
Track forecasts for sfc. lows associated w/ significant winter weather
3
• Analysis of lift, instability, moisture, and thermal profiles of model solutions
• Use model/ensemble blender to generate first guess
Winter Weather Desk (WWD) Forecast ProcessWinter Weather Desk (WWD) Forecast Process
•Forecaster edits first guess, and sends to WFOs
- Precipitation type from thermal profile of blend - Snow-liquid ratio from Roebber technique /Climatology/ fixed ratio
4
• WFO input used to modify public snow/ice probabilistic forecasts
• HPC input used to modify grids within GFE to produce local forecast
• Results in final collaborated forecast
HPC/WFO Collaboration via instant message, phone and/or event conference calls
WWD Collaborative Forecast ProcessWWD Collaborative Forecast Process
5Courtesy Brian Montgomery, WFO Albany
(snow blue-green-orange, freezing rain pink-purple)
Advent of WWD Accumulation Grids in AWIPSAdvent of WWD Accumulation Grids in AWIPS
6
Snow, freezing rain, and snow to liquid ratio grids are available in six hourly increments for ingest at WFOs.
Requested at NROW 2008!
Courtesy Brian Montgomery, WFO Albany
Advent of WWD Accumulation Grids in GFEAdvent of WWD Accumulation Grids in GFE
7
Probabilistic snow forecast verificationProbabilistic snow forecast verification
-20-15-10
-505
1015
Brier Skill Score (x
100)
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
Skill Relative to Automated Superensemble
4"8"12"
•Hypothesis: Probabilities for ≥12” threshold forecast over too small of area (i.e., under dispersive / too focused on a preferred solution or
cluster of solutions)
NAM + GFS + SREF members + GEFS members
8
2008-9 Day One Snow 2008-9 Day One Snow Accumulation Threat ScoresAccumulation Threat Scores
Green: Winter Weather Desk manual forecast
Blue: NAM+GFS+ SREF mean +GEFS mean
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Threat score
4" 8" 12"
WWD
SUPERENS
9
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Threat Score
4" 8" 12"
WWD
SUPERENS
Green: Winter Weather Desk manual forecast
Blue: NAM+GFS+SREF mean +GEFS mean
2008-9 Day Two Snow 2008-9 Day Two Snow Accumulation Threat ScoresAccumulation Threat Scores
10
00.020.040.060.08
0.10.120.140.160.18
0.2
Threat Score
4" 8" 12"
WWD
SUPERENS
Green: Winter Weather Desk manual forecast
Blue: NAM+GFS+SREF mean +GEFS mean
2008-9 Day Three Snow 2008-9 Day Three Snow Accumulation Threat ScoresAccumulation Threat Scores
11
2008-9 Day One Ice 2008-9 Day One Ice Accumulation Threat ScoresAccumulation Threat Scores
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
Threat Score
0.01" 0.25" 0.50"
WWD
SUPERENS
Green: Winter Weather Desk manual forecast
Blue: NAM+GFS+SREF mean +GEFS mean
12
2008-9 Day Two Ice 2008-9 Day Two Ice Accumulation Threat ScoresAccumulation Threat Scores
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
Threat Score
0.01" 0.25" 0.50"
WWD
SUPERENS
Green: Winter Weather Desk manual forecast
Blue: NAM+GFS+SREF mean +GEFS mean
13
2008-9 Day Three Ice 2008-9 Day Three Ice Accumulation Threat ScoresAccumulation Threat Scores
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Threat Score
0.01" 0.25" 0.50"
WWD
SUPERENS
Green: Winter Weather Desk manual forecast
Blue: NAM+GFS+SREF mean +GEFS mean
14
Verification of HPC low tracks Verification of HPC low tracks (position at each forecast hour)(position at each forecast hour)
Average of GFS/NAM did best through 24 hours, while ECMWF
and HPC were best after 48 hours.
15
The NCEP Short-Range Ensemble Forecast (SREF)
System
Jun Du, Geoff DiMego and Bill Lapenta
NOAA/NWS/NCEPEnvironmental Modeling Center
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/notification/tin09-29aaasref_upgrade.txt
16
• Upgrade models: WRF-NMM, WRF-ARW and RSM
• Increase horizontal resolution:– ARW (45 km to 35 km)– NMM (40 km to 32 km)– RSM (45 km to 32 km)
• Total Membership = 21:– Adding 4 WRF members– Eliminating 4 Eta members
• Zhou cloud physics Ferrier (3 RSM members)
• Ensemble Transform (ET) perturbations (10 WRF members)
• Increase output frequency from every 3 hr to hourly for 1st 39hr
• Add/fix/unify variables in SREF output– radar (composite reflectivity + echo top) (aviation)– unify PBL height diagnosis with critical Ri (aviation)– fix cloud base (aviation)– BUFR broken out into individual station time-series (SPC)– Hurricane track
Upgrades to the SREF systemUpgrades to the SREF system (Implemented 27 Oct. 2009)(Implemented 27 Oct. 2009)
87 h forecast
17
SREF Plume – State College, PASREF Plume – State College, PAInitial time: 09 UTC 23 Nov 2008Initial time: 09 UTC 23 Nov 2008
Cold WRF v2.0 Members
18
SREF Plume – State College, PASREF Plume – State College, PAInitial time: 09 UTC 23 Nov 2008Initial time: 09 UTC 23 Nov 2008
19
SREF Future PlansSREF Future Plans • 2010:
– Post processed output of SREF members downscaled to 5 or 2.5km
– Addition of more variables to AWIPS
– Addition of more ensemble products requested by users such as AFWA
– Eta members discontinued
20
SREF Future PlansSREF Future Plans • 2010:
– Post processed output of SREF members downscaled to 5 or 2.5km
– Addition of more variables to AWIPS
– Addition of more ensemble products requested by users such as AFWA
– Eta members discontinued
• 2012: – SREF run at 20 km resolution
(2010 run at 32 km)
– Introduction of the NAM Rapid Refresh (10-12 km, hourly update to the 24 hour forecast)
– Introduction of higher resolution (3 km) nested rapid refresh for high impact events in CONUS, AK and HI
21
The NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS)
John Ward
NOAA/NWS/NCEPEnvironmental Modeling Center
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/notification/tin09-32gfs_changes.txt
22
December 15 ImplementationDecember 15 Implementation
• Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) Analysis/GFS Fall Bundle
– Ingest new data types – primarily satellite
– Motivation: Simulating ECMWF initialization improved GFS forecast performance ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/142644.pdf
– Benefits
» Better tropical cyclone definition» Small incremental improvement in forecast skill
23
24 h accumulated precip ending 12 UTC 15 July 2009Observed
Update Shallow convection, Deep Convection, PBL SchemesBenefits
Significant reduction in gridpoint stormsImprovement in forecast skill (QPF, wind, temp, etc)
72 h GFS Forecast
72 h GFSp Forecast
March 2010 ImplementationMarch 2010 Implementation
24
• GFS Resolution Increase
– T382L64 (~35 km) T574L64 ( ~27 km grid spacing)
– Benefits
» Overall improvement in forecast skill
May 2010 ImplementationMay 2010 Implementation
25
The NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS)
upgradesYuejian Zhu
Zoltan Toth, Richard Wobus, Dingchen Hou and Bo Cui
Global Ensemble GroupEnvironmental Modeling Center
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/notification/tin09-34gefs.txt
26
Planned Changes - SummaryPlanned Changes - Summary
• Effective late January, 2010• Upgrade horizontal resolution from T126 to T190• Use 8th order horizontal diffusion for all resolutions
– Improved forecast skills and ensemble spread• Introduce Earth System Modeling Framework(ESMF) for GEFS
– Allows concurrent generation of all ensemble members– Needed for efficiency of stochastic perturbation scheme
• Add stochastic perturbation scheme to account for random model errors– Increased ensemble spread and forecast skill (reliability)
• Add new variables (28 more)– Mostly stratospheric
27
Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score for Northern Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score for Northern Hemisphere (NH) 850hPa temperatureHemisphere (NH) 850hPa temperature
Summer (08/01-09/30/2007)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Lead Time (days)
GEFS GEFSp
Winter (11/01-12/30/2007)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Lead Time (days)
GEFS GEFSp
Extend current 5-day skill to 6.5-day
Extend current 5-day skill to 6-day
28
NH Anomaly Correlation for 500hPa HeightNH Anomaly Correlation for 500hPa HeightPeriod: August 1Period: August 1stst – September 30 – September 30thth 2007 2007
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
An
om
aly
Co
rrel
atio
n
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Forecast Lead Time (days)
GFS GEFS GEFSp
GEFSp is better than GFS at 48
hours
Parallel GEFS forecast skill at day 9 equals the GFS skill at day 7
24 hours better than current GEFS48 hours better than current GFS
29
Summary
• WWD continues to provide critical winter weather forecast guidance and collaboration– Gridded snow and ice accumulations and SLR in AWIPS
• Several upcoming model upgrades– SREF (Oct 2009)– GFS (several phases)– GEFS (January 2010)
• WWD products generally improve upon NCEP model guidance
Questions or Comments?Dan Petersen(301)763-8201
30
WWD Snow/Ice Verification Method
Where model forecasts snow:Model forecast snow accumulation = model QPF * Snow Liquid Ratio
where the SLR is a 4 member mean of Roebber technique1 applied to GFS, Roebber technique applied to NAM, Climatology2, and 10:1
1Roebber, P. J., S. L. Bruening, D. M. Schultz, and J. V. Cortinas, 2003: Improving snowfall forecasting by diagnosing snow density. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 264-287.
2Baxter, M. A., C. E. Graves, and J. T. Moore, 2005: A climatology of snow-to-liquid ratio for the contiguous United States. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 729-744.
WWD gridded forecasts compared against •“Superensemble” (NAM+GFS+SREF mean+GEFS mean)• Manually selected model blend
P-type mask applied based on station obs.
Where snow: First guess snow analysis = NPVU QPE x climatological SLR2. The resulting first guess is adjusted by Coop, CoCorahs, and METAR observations.
Model forecast P-type determined from each model’s p-type algorithm
To compare skill of WWD forecasts versus models, need to convert 6-hourly model QPF forecasts into model snow and ice forecasts
Where model forecasts freezing rain:Model forecast ice accumulation = model QPF
6 hourly Snow and Ice Gridded Analyses
6-hourly Snow and Ice Gridded Forecasts
Where freezing rain: First guess ice analysis = NPVU QPE. This is adjusted by METAR observations.