1
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF IWMP (2010 – 2014)
Micro Watershed : Derajuri Micro Watershed Code No : 3B2C1i IWMP project : Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP Block : Rongkhang Development Block District : Karbi Anglong
Name of the PIA : Divisional officer, Hamren Soil Conservation Division,Hamren, Karbi Anglong
2
Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 8
CHAPTER 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 9
Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................... 9
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 9
II). PROFILE OF THE WATERSHED PROJECT: ...................................................................................... 9
Table No.1.1 Project at a Glance ......................................................................................................10
Table No. 1.2 Need and Scope for Watershed Development ................................................................10
Table no.1.3: Watershed information .................................................................................................15
Table No.1.4: Status of other development project in the area .............................................................16
Table No. 1.5: Status of previous watershed programme- ....................................................................16
CHAPTER 2 ........................................................................................................................................17
General Description of Project Area ......................................................................................................17
Table 2.1: Location ..........................................................................................................................19
Details of the types of areas covered under the project .......................................................................21
3
Table no: 2.2 Land Details ................................................................................................................21
Table No. 2.3: Details of the types of areas covered under the project ..................................................21
Table No. 2.4: Details of Agro-climatic condition .................................................................................23
Table No. 2.5 Details of flood and drought in the project area ..............................................................24
Table No. 2.6: Details of soil erosion in the project area ......................................................................24
Table No. 2.7 Details of the Soil pH ...................................................................................................25
Table No.2.7.1 Climatic Condition ......................................................................................................26
Table No.-2.8 Physiographic Features ................................................................................................27
Table No. 2.9 Watershed characteristics .............................................................................................27
CHAPTER – 3 .....................................................................................................................................28
BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED ..........................................................................................28
Table No. 3.1: Demographic features: ...............................................................................................28
Table No. 3.2: Livestock details: ........................................................................................................28
Table No.3.3:Socio- economic status: ................................................................................................30
Table No. 3.4: Migration Details: .......................................................................................................31
Table No. 3.5: Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village: ...................31
Table No. 3.6: Infrastructure Facilities: .............................................................................................33
Table No.3.7 Land use pattern (in Hectares) ......................................................................................35
4
Table No. 3.8: Details of Common Property Resources: .......................................................................36
Table No. 3.9: Agriculture implements: ............................................. Table No. 3.10: Crop Classification 37
Table No. 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern: .........................................................................................37
Table No. 3.12: Land capability Classification.....................................................................................38
Table No.3.13: Irrigation facilities:....................................................................................................39
Table No. 3.14: Status of water table: ...............................................................................................39
Table No. 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility*: .......................................................................40
Table No. 3.16: Surface water resources ...........................................................................................41
Table No. 3.17 Ground Water Structures to be repaired. .......................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Table No. 3.18: Existing Water Saving Practices: ................................................................................41
Table No. 3.19: Details of existing livelihoods .....................................................................................42
Table No. 3.20: Existing functional assets (Works already completed under different schemes including works undertaken by farmers independently) .....................................................................................43
Table No.3.21 PROBLEM TYPOLOGY OF THE WATERSHED ..................................................................43
CHAPTER – 4 .....................................................................................................................................45
Institutional Building and Project Management ......................................................................................45
Table No. 4.1 Details of SHGs & UGs newly formed under IWMP: .........................................................46
4.2: Details of Watershed Committees (WC) ......................................................................................48
5
Table No 4.3: WDT Particulars: .........................................................................................................49
Table No. 4.4: PIA particulars ..........................................................................................................49
Table No. 4.5 Bank Account Details ...................................................................................................50
Institutional Mechanisms: (Enclose the following documents) ...............................................................50
Documents of Agreements: ..............................................................................................................51
Table No. 4.8 Convergence plan with IWMP: ......................................................................................52
CHAPTER – 5 .....................................................................................................................................54
Management/Action Plan ....................................................................................................................54
Description on methodology of plan adopted ......................................................................................54
5.2 Details of Natural Resource Management Activities ........................................................................57
Table No. 5.2.1 Soil and Moisture Conservation structures ...................................................................57
Table No. 5.2.2 Water Harvesting Structures ......................................................................................61
Table No. 5.2.2 Vegetative Covers .....................................................................................................64
5.3: Structure or Activity Wise Details of Engineering Structure and Vegetative Measures .......................76
Table No.5.3.1 : Engineering structures for Soil Conservation Measures (SMC) ....................................76
5.3.2: Details of engineering structures for Water Harvesting WHS ........... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Table No. 5.3.3: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works* ............... Error! Bookmark not defined.
6
Chapter 6 ..........................................................................................................................................80
Capacity Building Plan .........................................................................................................................80
Table No. 6.1 Details of Capacity Building ..........................................................................................81
Chapter 7 ..........................................................................................................................................83
Phasing of Programme and Budgeting .................................................................................................83
Table No. 7.1: Phasing of the action plan ..........................................................................................83
Table No. 7.2 Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio....................................................................................... 106
Chapter 8 ........................................................................................................................................ 107
Consolidation and completion of various works .................................................................................... 107
Table No. 8.1: Consolidation of Action Plan ...................................................................................... 107
CHAPTER – 9 ................................................................................................................................... 109
EXPECTED OUTCOMES ..................................................................................................................... 109
9.1 Describe in detail the “Expected Outcomes” ..................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Table No. 9.2: Summarize in the table given below (Quantifiable indicators) ........................................ 111
Table No.9.3: Backward and Forward Linkages ................................................................................ 113
List of Maps to be enclosed along with DPR. ....................................................................................... 116
7
Annexure 1: Five Year Budget Details as approved by CEO SLNA – JSWM and Rural Development Secretary, Jharkhand
Annexure 2: Convergence of IWMP and MNREGA guideline of DoLR, GoI
Annexure 3: Action Plan as recommended by CEO SLNA-JSWM
8
Executive Summary Brief about area
Institutional arrangements
Salient Project activities
Physical target and financial outlays
Treatment area and details
Fact sheet about bench mark indicators and action plan a glance.
9
CHAPTER 1
Introduction and Background
INTRODUCTION Name of the State : Assam
Name of the District :Karbi Anglong
Names of the Blocks : Rongkhang Development Block
Name of the project : Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP
Financial Year of sanction :
Project duration : From………2010……………………….. to…………2014…………………
Map of the project area showing village boundaries, contours and drainage.
PROFILE OF THE WATERSHED PROJECT:
Derajuri (Karbi Anglong IWMP-23) project is located in Karbi Anglong District of Assam. The project is a cluster of
four micro-watersheds with 3B2C1i2b, 3B2C1i1d, 3B2C1i2a and 3B2C1i1c being their respective codes. The total
project area of the watershed is about 3990.0 ha, of which 3438.79 ha has been identified for treatment under
Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2013-14.
The nearest town is Hamren, which is located at about 35 Km from Derajuri and is connected by Pucca road. The
project area lies in the edges of Hamren town. The watershed includes 13 villages. The villages are Artu Bonglong
Gaon, Derajuri Killing Gaon, Bilandi Gaon, Dera Arlok Gaon, Thongja Gaon, Ingti Basapo Gaon, Dera Nihang Gaon,
Thervecherop Gaon, Chek Artur Gaon, Kabung Gaon, Barman Pangcho Gaon, Harlongsora Gaon and Waham Langso .
Karbi communities are the primary inhabitants of the villages. The livelihood of the people of the project area is
primarily based on rainfed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, goat and pig rearing. The project area falls
10
under the hilly area according to the classification of ………..(DoLR) of Govt of India.. The villages are very poor on
the border of Nagaon and Karbi Anglong district of Assam. The topography of the area is undulating and primarily with
low top hills in the west and steep hills in the south. The basic project information is presented in Table 1.1
Table No.1.1 Project at a Glanc
1 Name of the State Assam 2 Name of the project Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP 3 Name of the District Karbi Anglong 4 Names of the Blocks Rongkhang Development Block 5 Names of Gram Panchayats Hamren Constituency of Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council,Karbi Anglong 6 Names & Census Code of Villages covered Artu Bonglong
Gaon
Barman Pangcho
Gaon 295490 Derajuri
Killing Gaon 295484 Harlongsora
Gaon 295492
Bilandi Gaon
296818 Waham Langso 295483
Dera Arlok Gaon 285485
Thongja Gaon
Ingti Basapo
Gaon
Dera Nihang
Gaon 295487
Thervecherop
Gaon
Chek Artur
Gaon 295465
Kabung Gaon 295488
7 Four major reasons for selection of watershed
11
8 Name, Address , Phone No and Reg.No.. of the PIA(s)
Divisional officer, Hamren Soil Conservation Division,Hamren, Karbi Anglong
9 Date of approval of Watershed Development Plan by the DPC
10 Area of the Project (ha.) 3990 11 Area proposed to be treated (ha.) 3438.79 12 Financial Year of sanction 13 Project duration From 2011 To 2017 14 Project Cost (Rs. in Lakhs) 515.82 15 Date of Sanction by State authority 16 Date of Release of 1st Installment of Central
Assistance (To be filled by DoLR) 17 Any other, please specify
Table No. 1.2 Need and Scope for Watershed Development Watershed Development Programme is prioritized based on the thirteen parameters namely, Poverty Index, Percentage
of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under
rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of degraded land, Productivity Potential of the land,
Continuity of another watershed that has already developed /treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. The
criteria and weightage for selection of watershed are given in Table 2. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite
ranking was given to Derajuri Watershed project
The total number of BPL families is more than 80 percent of the total households of the village; hence a score of 10 is
allotted. The schedule tribes population in the village is about 100 percent; hence a score of 10 was allotted. Rainfed
agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is acidic(pH in the range of
…….) and hence unfit for usage. More than 60 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual
wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages. Hence a composite rank of 5 and 10 are allotted
12
respectively.
Since the rainfall received is high and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under rainfed.
Drinking water is problematic in the village. Majority of land is degraded due to inherent soil loss and degraded land.
The soil is very permeable and production of crop can be significantly enriched with the provision of timely irrigation.
Derajuri watershed falls in continuity with Karbi ……. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration four
micro-watersheds covering a total area of 3990 Ha. Thus, a cumulative score of 93.0
is given to the watershed.
The cumulative scores of the project area are calculated as per the criteria and scores mentioned in Table 2 . The actual field data were calculated during baseline survey and participatory rural appraisal (PRA) conducted in the area.
A write up elaborating the weightage table for selection of the watershed. (Weightage for selection of Watershed (as per DoLR’s instructions already issued)
Project Name Project Type
Weightage i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii Total
Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP
Artu Bonglong Gaon
8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
Derajuri Killing Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
Bilandi Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0 Dera Arlok Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
Thongja Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0 Ingti Basapo Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
13
Dera Nihang Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
Thervecherop Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
Chek Artur Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
Kabung Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0 Barman Pangcho Gaon
8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
Harlongsora Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
Waham Langso 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0
*As per PPR
Slno. Criteria Max Score
Ranges and Scores
i Poverty index(%of poor to population)
10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20% (2.5)
ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40% (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20% (3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages (5)
Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)
iv % of small and marginal farmers
10 More than 80% (10) 50 to 80% (5) Less than 50 (3)
v Ground water status 15 Over exploited (15) Critical (10) Sub critical (5) Safe (0)
vi Moisture index/ DPAP/DDP Block
10 -66.7 & below (10) DDP Block -33.3 to -66.6 (5) DPAP Block
0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/DDP Block
vii Area under assured irrigation
15 Less than 10% (15) 10 to 20% (10) 20 to 30% (5) Above 30% (Reject)
14
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)
ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20% (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)
Low – less than 10 % of TGA (5)
x Productivity potential of the land
10 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)
Land with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)
Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (0)
xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/treated
10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (10)
Contiguity with in the micro watersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)
Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (0)
xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)
4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster (10)
2 to 4 micro watersheds in cluster (5)
xiii Cluster approach in the hills (More than one contiguous micro- watersheds in the project)
15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)
3 to 5 micro watersheds in cluster (10)
2 to 3 micro watersheds in cluster (5)
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5
15
Table no.1.3: Watershed information
Sl no Name of Project Watershed Code Villages to be Treated
Geographical Area(Ha)
Treatable Area(Ha) Approval Year
1
Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP
3B2C1i2b MWS1
Artu Bonglong Gaon 279 240 2 Derajuri Killing Gaon 265 229 3 Bilandi Gaon 292 252 4
3B2C1i1d MWS2
Dera Arlok Gaon 366 316 5 Thongja Gaon 523 451 6 Ingti Basapo Gaon 230 198 7 Dera Nihang Gaon 345 298 8
3B2C1i2a MWS3
Thervecherop Gaon 264 228 9 Kabung Gaon 198 171
10 Barman Pangcho Gaon
132 115
11 Chek Artur Gaon 66 57 12 3B2C1i1c
MWS4
Harlongsora Gaon 668 576
13 Waham Langso
360 310
Other developmental projects running in the Derajuri village:
The villages proposed to be covered in the project are very backward. Currently, there is no other developmental
projects included under national flagship programmes like Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee
Scheme (MGNREGS), Border Area Development programme (BADP), Nirmal Bharat Abhijan(NBA), Swarnajayanti
Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY), Indira Awas Yojana (IAY).. Backward Region Grant Fund (BRGF). The details are
16
given in Table 1.4
Table No.1.4: Status of other development project in the area Table No.1.4: Status of other development project in the area
S no Name of the programme/scheme
Sponsoring agency
Objectives of the programme/scheme
Year of commencement
Villages covered Estimated number of beneficiaries
No other watershed programme was taken up in the project area
In the proposed project area no watershed development projects were taken up in the past.
Table No. 1.5: Status of previous watershed programme-
S. No
Project name
Year started
Name of villages
No. Of micro watershed
Watershed codes
Area under treatment
Funding source
Nodal agency
PIA
Total cost
Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP
% financial completion
% physical completion
17
CHAPTER 2
General Description of Project Area Assam State Soil Conservation Department is the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Water shed Management
Programme (IWMP) in Assam. The SLNA selects the Project implementing Agency (PIA) by an appropriate mechanism. The PIAs are
responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations
under state/Central Governments, Government Institutes/ research bodies. The PIA for Derajuri watershed Project is District watershed
development Unit (DWDU), Hamren.
The organization and its objectives:
The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU, Hamren is a district level watershed agency to oversee the smooth implementation
of watershed projects in the district. The Divisional Officer (DO), Soil Conservation Department is the chairmen of the DWDU. The
DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Manager (Range Officer, Derajuri Soil Conservation Range), a
technical expert and multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert, community mobilization expert and
Data Entry Operator, Civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and accountant. The objectives of the DWDU, Hamren
are supervision, planning, implementation, documentation and promotion of watershed development projects and related developmental
activities in the district as per guidelines. The DWDU, Hamren also works as a PIA for some IWMP projects.
Programmes/ projects of DWDU, Diphu:
At present 11 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Karbi Angng District. Diphu and Hamren Soil
Conservation Division are the PIAs in the district. The entry point activities of all the eleven IWMP projects have been identified by the
respective PIAs in the district through PRA. Diphu Soil Conservation Division is PIA for 5 projects and Hamren Soil Conservation
Division is the PIA for rest of the two projects.
SWOT analysis of the DWDU:
18
Strength:
1. DWDU is manned by Dedicated and experienced staff
2. DWDU is equipped with a multidisciplinary team
3. Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, Assam University and NGOs for capacity building
and technical guidance.
4. Scientific planning of the watershed projects with the help of M/s Survive NE, Guwahati.
5. District level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee.
Weakness:
1. Inaccessibility with respect to motor able road 2. Disruption of Public Activities due to frequent disturbance in the area.
Opportunities:
1. Possibility of convergence with other development schemes. (MGNREGA, NBA etc.) 2. Better financial provision under IWMP 3. Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS
Threats:
1. Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth implementation of the project 2. Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people
19
Table 2.1: Location
Longitude 92°44'30" E to 92°48'30 E Latitude 25°47'30" N to 25°53'0" N State Assam District Karbi Anglong Subdivision Hamren Block Ronghang Development Block Panchayat Hamren Constituency of Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council,Karbi Anglong Villages Artu Bonglong Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon Harlongsora Gaon
Bilandi Gaon Waham Langso Dera Arlok Gaon Thongja Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon Thervecherop Gaon
Kabung Gaon Barman Pangcho Gaon
Approach Road Yes
20
INSERT WATERSHED LOCATION MAP
21
Details of the types of areas covered under the project (Area in Ha.)
Table no: 2.2 Land Details
S. No.
Names of villages
Geographical Area of the village (ha)
Forest Area (ha)
Land under agricultural use (ha)
Rain-fed area (ha)
Irrigated Area
Permanent pastures (ha)
Wasteland Cultivable
(ha) Non-cultivable (ha)
1 Artu Bonglong Gaon 279 13.93 164 11.15 8.36 47.37 0.84
2 Derajuri Killing Gaon 265 13.27 157 10.62 7.96 45.12 0.80
3 Bilandi Gaon 292 14.60 172 11.68 8.76 49.63 0.88 4 Dera Arlok Gaon 366 18.31 216 14.65 10.99 62.26 1.10 5 Thongja Gaon 523 26.16 309 20.93 15.70 88.95 1.57 6 Ingti Basapo Gaon 230 11.51 136 9.21 6.91 39.14 0.69 7 Dera Nihang
Gaon 345 17.27 204 13.81 10.36 58.70 1.04
8 Thervecherop Gaon 264 13.22 156 10.58 7.93 44.95 0.79
9 Kabung Gaon 198 9.92 117 7.93 5.95 33.71 0.59 10 Barman Pangcho
Gaon 132 6.61 78 5.29 3.97 22.47 0.40
11 Chek Artur Gaon 66 3.305 39 2.64 1.98 11.24 0.20 12 Harlongsora Gaon 668 33.41 394 26.73 20.05 113.59 2.00 13 Waham Langso 360 17.99 212 14.39 10.79 61.17 1.08
Table No. 2.3: Details of the types of areas covered under the project 1 2 3
S. No. Name of village
No. of beneficiaries covered
MF SF LF Landless Total
22
1 Artu Bonglong Gaon 2 Derajuri Killing Gaon 3 Bilandi Gaon 4 Dera Arlok Gaon 5 Thongja Gaon 6 Ingti Basapo Gaon 7 Dera Nihang Gaon 8 Thervecherop Gaon 9 Kabung Gaon 10 Barman Pangcho Gaon 11 Chek Artur Gaon 12 Harlongsora Gaon 13 Waham Langso
Soil and topography:
The Derajuri watershed project (LWP) is under Sub tropical to Humic Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly sandy loam and clayey.
The soil is reddish to very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep; about 12 to 115 cm. The
predominant texture of soil is loamy sand and clay. The soil fertility is poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography
of the area is moderate ranging from 0-42% slope.
The rainfall is high which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of soil erosion in the watershed area. The average rainfall of this area is
about 655 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 120 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution is leading to
runoff of soil every year to the streams, rivulets and depressed area of the watershed area. The soil type and topography of the project
area are given in Table 2.4
23
Table No. 2.4: Details of Agro-climatic condition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sl. No.
Name of the Project
Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area
Area in ha
Names of the villages
Major soil types Major crops
a)Type b) Area in ha
a) Name
b) Area in ha
1
Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri)
IWMP
Sub Tropical to Humic
279
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric
Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic Hapludalf 240
Paddy 47
2 265 Derajuri Killing Gaon
Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic Hapludalf 229
Paddy 45
3 292
Bilandi Gaon Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric
Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic Hapludalf 252
Paddy 50
4 366 Dera Arlok Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic
Hapludalf 316 Paddy
62
5 523
Thongja Gaon Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric
Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic Hapludalf 451
Paddy 89
6 230
Ingti Basapo Gaon Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric
Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic Hapludalf 198
Paddy 39
7 345 Dera Nihang Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic
Hapludalf 298 Paddy
59
8 264 Thervecherop Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic
Hapludalf 228 Paddy
45
9 198 Chek Artur Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic
Hapludalf 171 Paddy
34
10 132 Kabung Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic
Hapludalf 115 Paddy
22
11 66
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric
Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic Hapludalf 57
Paddy 11
12 668 Harlongsora Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic
Hapludalf 576 Paddy
114
13 360 Waham Langso Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic
Hapludalf 310 Paddy
61
24
The flood and drough condition of the project area are given in Table 2.5
Table No. 2.5 Details of flood and drought in the project area
1 2 3 4 5
Sl. No. Particulars Villages
Periodicity
Not affected Annual
Any other (please specify)
1 Flood No. of villages 13 Name(s) of villages Artu Bonglong Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon Bilandi Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon Thongja Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon Thervecherop Gaon Chek Artur Gaon Kabung Gaon Barman Pangcho Gaon Harlongsora Gaon Waham Langso 2 Drought No. of villages 13
Name(s) of villages Artu Bonglong Gaon Derajuri Killing Gaon Bilandi Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
25
Thongja Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon Thervecherop Gaon Chek Artur Gaon Kabung Gaon Barman Pangcho Gaon Harlongsora Gaon Waham Langso
The soil Erosion type of the project area indicating run off and average soil loss are given in Table 2.6
Table No. 2.6: Details of soil erosion in the project area
1 2 3 4 5
Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha)
Run off Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year) (mm/ year)
Water erosion a Sheet 1195
785 mm/yr 1.35 Tones/ha/yr b Rill 1040 c Gully 105
Sub-Total 2340 0 0 Wind erosion 0 NA 0 Total 2340 785 mm/yr 1.35 Tones/ha/yr
26
The soil of the project area is acidic The soil ingress type of the project area are given in Table 2.7
Table No. 2.7 Details of the Soil pH
Name of the Villages Sample no Soil Ph Soil Type Artu Bonglong Gaon NA 5.4 NA Derajuri Killing Gaon NA 6.5 NA Bilandi Gaon NA 6.1 NA Dera Arlok Gaon NA 6.2 NA Thongja Gaon NA 5.8 NA Ingti Basapo Gaon NA 6.2 NA Dera Nihang Gaon NA 6.3 NA Thervecherop Gaon NA 5.9 NA Chek Artur Gaon NA 6.9 NA Kabung Gaon NA 6.5 NA Barman Pangcho Gaon NA 5.6 NA Harlongsora Gaon NA 6.2 NA Waham Langso NA 5.9 NA
The climatic condition of the project area depicts highest rainfall of 1950 mm During the period 2008 to 2012 The
overall climatic condition are given in Table 2.7.1
Table No.2.7.1 Climatic Condition
Sl No Year Average Monthly Rain fall(in mm)
Average Annual rainfall(in
mm)preceding 5 years
Temp(0C) Wind Velocity
Open pan evaporation
(mm per day)
Relative Humidity
(RH)
Average Annual run off
(mm/year) Max Min
1 2012 1350 655 37.4 10.5 32 71 33
27
2 2011 1950 685 36.5 11.6 31 69 31 3 2010 1430 690 35.9 11.3 30 68 29 4 2009 1590 655 36.5 10.8 28 73 32 5 2008 1650 590 35.4 9.6 33 38 28
Table No.-2.8 Physiographic Features
Elevation(MSL) Slope Range(%) Order of Watershed Major Stream
Toposequence
(Soil series) Average annual soil loss(Ton / hectare/year)
126 m 0-9% MWS 1 NA 195 m 0-7% MWS 2 NA 121 m 0-8% MWS 3 NA 130 m 0-7% MWS 4 NA
Table No. 2.9 Watershed characteristics Shape index of the watershed
Length of main stream
Drainage density Average slope Watershed relief Perimeter of the watershed
28
CHAPTER – 3
BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED Derajuri watershed project has a total of 1553 households with a population of 5540 (as per base-line survey ) out of
which 2778 are male and 2762 female. The sex ratio is 1017 female to 1000 male. There are 388 BPL families. The
average family size is 5. The literacy rate is very low i.e, 19.2 percent; male literacy rate is 26.4 per cent (of total
male population) and female literacy rate is very low i.e; 8.25 percent (of total female population).The major castes
in the village are Karbi and all are Schedule Tribes. Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal
husbandry.
The demographic information of the project area are depicted in Table 3.1
Table No. 3.1: Demographic features:
1 2 3 4 5 S.No Feature Male Female Total 1 Population 2778 2762 5540 SC 5 4 9 ST 2819 2710 5529 BC 0 0 0 Others 0 0 0 2 Children(0-14
years)
3 Sex Ratio
4 Literacy 1459 1028 2487
Literates 0 Illiterates 0
29
5 Work Force 2143 1611 3754 Agriculture 1896 1169 3065 Industrial/Business 748 286 1034 Service 48 28 76 6 Birth Rate 7 Death Rate
The watershed has 472 cows, 462 buffalos, 1380 goats,1034 poultry and 1090 pigs. Majority of karbi community
depends on goat and pig rearing for their livelihood. Cows and bullocks are of local breed. Lack of rain and surface
water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts
of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. Milk production is so low that there is no dairy cooperative in the
village.
The Livestock details are given in Table 3.2
Table No. 3.2: Livestock details:
1 2 3 S.No Feature No./ quantity)
1 Milch Animals Cows 472 Buffaloes 462 Goat, sheep 1380
2 Draft Animals Ox 0 He Buffalo 0
3 Others
30
Poultry 1034 Piggery 1090
4 Total Milk production from milch animals (ltrs/day) 5 Fodder Availability
Dry (Abundant/Sufficient/ Scarce) Sufficient Green (Abundant/Sufficient/ Scarce) Abundant
6 Fuel wood Availability (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Sufficient
Table No.3.3:Socio- economic status:
1 2 3 4 5 6 S. No Type Total
HHs No. of BPL HHs
Land Holding (Ha) Annual Gross Income (Rs.) Rain fed Irrigated SC ST Others Total SC ST Others SC ST Others
1 Marginal 895 186 2 Small Farmers 413 77 3 Big farmers 168 104 4 Landless 77 21
Total 1553 388
31
Migration Pattern:
People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Nagaon, Lanka,Hamren and Diphu as daily
wagers, agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller
ruminant force these people to migrate to other places.
About 17% of population are migrating to other areas in search of livelihood. The details of migration in the project
area are given in Table 3.4
Table No. 3.4: Migration Details:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sl. No. No. of persons migrating No. of days per
year of migration Major reason(s) for
migrating
Distance of destination of migration from the village (km)
Occupation during
migration
Income from such occupation
(Rs.) M F Total 1 1692 785 2477 150-200 Livelihood option 20-30 km Casual Labours Rs 3500 / month
Table No. 3.5: Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S. No.
Type of
Group Total no. of CBOs No. of members
No. of ST in each
category
No. of SC in each
category
No. of Others in
each category
No. of BPL in each
category
Bank linkage
32
With
only Men
With only
Women
With
both
Total M F
Total M F
Total M F
Total M F
Total M F
Total
No. of SHGs
Bank Loan Amount (Rs.)
1 SHG
(i) Landles
s
(ii) MF (iii) SF (iv) LF
Total
2
UGs
11 7 0 18
(i) Landles
s 0 0 0
(ii) MF 9 7 16 (iii) SF 11 9 20 (iv) LF 0 0 0
Total 20
16 36
3 VSS
4 FG/
FC[1]
5 WUA
6 F-SHG-
C
7 F-SHG-
B
8 PG 9 PC
10
Other related Groups (Specif
y)
[1]
33
VSS: Van Suraksha Samiti, FG: Farmer’s Group/ Farmer’s Club, WUA: Water User Association, F-SHG: Federation of SHGs (C: at Cluster, B: at Block), PG: Producer’s Group, PC: Producer’s Cooperative.
Infrastructure facilities:
Derajuri watershed is well connected with Hamren Sub division with pucca roads. The village has electricity
connectivity of the State Government. Nearly 75 percent of households in the village have their personal electric
meters. Derajuri watershed has 13 primary schools. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to
go to Hamren which is about 35 kilometers away. This also contributed to lower education level of the people. The
village do not have a Primary Health Center for which villagers have to go to Hamren which is 35 Km. away.
The details of village infrastructure in the project area are given in Table 3.6
Table No. 3.6: Infrastructure Facilities:
1 2 3 4 5 S.No Infrastructure type No./Quantity Distance (km) Status
(description) 1 Educational Institutions
Anganwadi 3 Primary School 13 105 Secondary school 1 2.7 Govt. College 0 2.8
34
Vocational Institutions 0 2 Service Institutions
Bank 0 0 Post office 0 0 Primary Health Care Center 0 0 Veterinary Center 0 Markets/ Village Haat 10 1.2
3 No. of bore wells/pump sets (Functional) 4 No. of Milk collection centers
( Union/ Society/ Pvt. Agency/Others) Total Quantity of surplus milk
5 Road Connectivity (to main road by an all-weather road) (Yes/No)
Yes
6 Bus facility (Yes/No) Yes 7 No. of HHs provided electricity 510 8 No. of HHs with access to drinking water 17 9 Access to Agro Industries (Yes/No) No
10 Any other facilities (specify-------------)
Land use pattern:
The net geographical area of Derajuri watershed is about 3990.0 ha of which 26% is forest area. The forest area is
mainly divided into two parts; one part is hilly while other part plain or gentle slope (0 to 3% slope). About 51.8%
of land is under agriculture which is completely rainfed; mainly a kharif crop is taken. About 39% of the total land
is classified under wasteland of which 60 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly. The land use
pattern of the project area are shown in Table 3.7
35
Table No.3.7 Land use pattern (in Hectares)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*
S. No Village
Geographical Area#
Forest
Area Community Land
Land under Non
Agriculture Use
Permanent
Pastures
Land Under
miscellaneous use
Uncultivated Private land Cultivated area
Net Sow
n Area
Net Area
sown
more
than
once
Gross Cropp
ed Area
Temporary
fallow
Permanent
Fallow
Cultivated
Rainfed
Cultivated
Irrigated
1 Artu Bonglong Gaon 279
13.93 NA NA
8.36 NA NA NA
11.15 NA
47.37 NA
47.37
2 Derajuri Killing Gaon 265
13.27 NA NA
7.96 NA NA NA
10.62 NA
45.12 NA
45.12
3 Bilandi Gaon 292
14.60 NA NA 8.76 NA NA NA 11.68 NA
49.63 NA 49.63
4 Dera Arlok Gaon 366
18.31 NA NA 10.99 NA NA NA 14.65 NA
62.26 NA 62.26
5 Thongja Gaon 523
26.16 NA NA 15.70 NA NA NA 20.93 NA
88.95 NA 88.95
6 Ingti Basapo Gaon 230
11.51 NA NA
6.91 NA NA NA
9.21 NA
39.14 NA
39.14
7 Dera Nihang Gaon 345
17.27 NA NA
10.36 NA NA NA
13.81 NA
58.70 NA
58.70
8 Thervecherop Gaon 264
13.22 NA NA 7.93 NA NA NA 10.58 NA
44.95 NA 44.95
9 Chek Artur Gaon 198 9.92 NA NA 5.95 NA NA NA 7.93 NA
33.71 NA 33.71
36
10
Kabung Gaon 132 6.61 NA NA 3.97 NA NA NA 5.29 NA
22.47 NA 22.47
11
Barman Pangcho Gaon 66
3.305 NA NA
1.98 NA NA NA
2.64 NA
11.24 NA
11.24
12
Harlongsora Gaon 668
33.41 NA NA 20.05 NA NA NA 26.73 NA
113.59 NA 113.59
13
Waham Langso 360
17.99 NA NA 10.79 NA NA NA 14.39 NA
61.17 NA 61.17
#geographical area here is the area covered under the watershed.
* Coloumn 13 is the summation of coloumn 11 & 12.
Table No. 3.8: Details of Common Property Resources:
1 2 3 4
S.No CPR Particulars
Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha) Area owned/ In possession of
Pvt. persons
Govt.
PRI Any other (Pl. Specify)
Pvt. persons
Govt.
PRI Any other (Pl. Specify)
(specify dept.)
(specify deptt.)
Wasteland/ degraded land 16.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pastures 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Village Forest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Forest 0 16.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent markets 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Temples/ Places of
worship 0 0.12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Others (Pl. specify) Total 20.0 19.2
37
Table No. 3.9: Agriculture implements: Table No. 3.10: Crop Classification
\
The crop details (area covered, productivity) during monsoon and winter are shown in Table 3.11
Table No. 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern: Table No. 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern:
1 2 3 4 5 6 S. No
Season Crop sown
Rain fed Irrigated Total Area (ha)
Production (Ton/yr)
Productivity (Kgs/ha)
Cost of cultivation (Rs. /ha)
Area (ha)
Production (Ton/yr)
Productivity (Kgs/ha)
Cost of cultivation (Rs. /ha)
Area (ha)
Production (Ton/yr)
Productivity (Kgs/ha)
Cost of cultivation (Rs. /ha)
1 Kharif Paddy 1891.34
2867.74 21566 1891.
34 2867.7
4 21566 Maize 240.7
16 327.82 19764.7 240.716
327.82 19764.7
1 2 3
S. No Crop classification Area (Ac)
1 Single crop 277
2 Double crop
3 Multiple crop
1 2 3
S. No Implements Nos.
1 Tractor
2 Sprayers-manual/ power
3 Cultivators/Harrows
4 Seed drill
38
2 Rabi Mustard
103.164 16.05 2498 103.1
64 16.05 2498 Cash Crops
137.552 19.40 2118.0 137.5
52 19.40 2118.0
3 Summer
Total 2373 3231.
00 45947.
2 2373 3231.
00 45947.
2
Table No. 3.12: Land capability Classification
1 2 3 4 5 6 Land class
S.No Land type
Total Area
(ha)
Soil Texture*
Based on Depth (cms)-
(mention area in ha)
Based on Slope (%) (mention area in ha)
Erosion
(mention area in ha)
V. Shallow (0.75)
Shallow (7.5-22.5)
Moderate deep (22.5-45.00)
Deep (45.0-90.0)
Very. Deep (>90)
Nearly Level (0-2)
Moderate slope (2-6)
Strong slope (6-15)
Steep (>15)
Water
Wind
Sheet Rill Gully
39
* Soil texture (sandy-clay, clayey, loamy-clay, gravel)
Presently the irrigation facilities are provided through canal & Ponds in the project area. The Irrigation details are
given in Table 3.13
Table No.3.13: Irrigation facilities: Table No.3.13: Irrigation facilities:
1 2 3 4 S.No Type of the Source Nos. Command area (in ha)
1 Ponds 22 44 2 Open wells 0 0 3 Bore wells 0 0 4 Canal irrigation 16 32 5 Natural spring head 0 0
Table No. 3.14: Status of water table:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S.No Source (open well)** Plot No of the source
Name of the
Owner*
Date of recording
Depth of water table from
ground level (in mts)
Source located at (ridge/middle/valley)
Remarks
40
1
2
3
4
5
6
** Identify at least five representative open wells in the ridge/middle/valley portion. Collect the data at the time of DPR and maintain a register every Quarter
Table No. 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility*:
Table No. 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility*: 1 2 3 4 5
S.No Item Units Quantity Source 1 Drinking water requirement Ltrs/day 25400 Tube well 2 Present availability of drinking water Ltrs/day 11500 Tube well 3 No. of drinking water sources available Nos 2235 Tube well
a) Functional Nos b) Need Repairing Nos c) Defunct Nos 4 Short fall if any Ltrs/day 5 No. of families getting drinking water from out side the Micro watershed area Nos 6 Requirement of new drinking water sources (if any) Nos.
* based on the observation from the field * based on the observation from the field
41
Table No. 3.16: Surface water resources
1 2 3 4 5 S.No Type of water resource Nos Area irrigated
(Ha) Storage capacity (Cu.m)
1 Tank 0 NA NA 2 Pond 22 NA 42000 3 Lake 0 NA NA 4 Check dam 0 NA NA 5 Percolation tank 0 NA NA 6 Channel/Canal 0 NA NA 7 Any others (specify--------------)
Table No. 3.17 Ground Water Structures to be repaired.
S.No Type of structure
No. available
No. to be Repaired
No. to be rejuvenated
No. with no interventions
required Total 1 Pond 26 18 44 2 Open Well 12 8 20 3 Tank 3 1 4
Total 41 27 68
Table No. 3.18: Existing Water Saving Practices:
Name of the Major Crop Area (Ha) Under water
saving devices$ Under water conserving agronomic practices#
Any other (Pl. Specify) Total Current water Saving status as
against flood irrigation. (Cu.m)
42
Kharif
Rice Not in practice Not in practice Under rain-fed condition NA Maize Under rain-fed condition NA Mustard Under rain-fed condition NA Cash Crop Under rain-fed condition NA
$: Sprinklers, Drip, PVC Pipe, etc., #: Vermi compost, organic manuring, check basin, alternate furrow, Ridges and furrow & specific practices $: Sprinklers, Drip, PVC Pipe, etc.,
#: Vermi compost, organic manuring, check basin, alternate furrow, Ridges and furrow & specific practices
Livelihood pattern:
The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture. In lean seasons they migrate for daily
wage laborers to Hamren and as agriculture labour to other parts of the state. Another major occupation of the people
is rubber plantation and Charcoal making using the wood of Ademura which they collect from the community and
land or forest.
The details of Livelihood pattern in the project area are given in Table 3.19
Table No. 3.19: Details of existing livelihoods
Table No. 3.19: Details of existing livelihoods 1 2 3 4
S. No. Name of activity No. of beneficiaries Pre-project average
income per HH (Rs.) SC ST Others Total Women 1 Piggery 13 8000
43
2 Goatery 18 5000 3 Poultry 15 5000 4 Weaving 13 5000 5 Bamboo craft 0 0 6 Jaru making 0 0 7 Bee keeping 0 0
Table No. 3.20: Existing functional assets (Works already completed under different schemes including works undertaken by farmers independently)
1 2 3 4 5 6 S.lNo Name of the work Plot
No. Quantity
(No./RMTs) Amount spent (Rs.) Programme
No significant works undertaken
Primary problem of the project
Derajuri village comes under totally rainfed agriculture because of this migration percentage is very high. Soil is very
suitable for fodder crop mainly sorghum but due the scarcity of irrigation water only one crop can be taken throughout
the year. So fodder bank play an important role to solve this problem. Majority of farmers own less than 2.5 ha of land
for food and fodder production but lack of irrigation water has made these lands unproductive. The concept of fodder
bank can overcome the problem of seasonal feed shortage and migration and poor animal performance. It is the milch
44
animal, which is the worst affected during these periods of drought, due to lack of productivity of sufficient fodder and
water. As a result, the poor are forced to let go with their animals in search of fodder and green pastures to other parts of
the state. This eventually this leads to colossal loss of income generating assets, poor demographic profile of village and
low education level of their children.
Even in good years, during the harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such
time when supply is higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is
bought back by them, mostly at higher prices during the months of scarcity.
To meet the critical needs of fodder, especially for the poor families and protect them from inordinately high prices
during the summer months, fodder banks are proposed to be setup at the village level.
Table No.3.21 PROBLEM TYPOLOGY OF THE WATERSHED 1 2 3 4
S.No Problem area Problem analysis Proposed interventions to overcome problems
1 Soil Conservation (slope, erosion, soil loss, rainfall, productivity, etc)
2 Water conservation (Water budget, Ground water norms, productivity)
3 Crop coverage – {80% of w/s area should be with canopy}
4 Agriculture productivity (crop wise compare with dist. average)
45
5 Livestock productivity (Milk Yield, Meat yield, Eggs, Wool Yield, Kidding etc.)
6 Existing Livelihood activities for Asset less persons
7 Community Based Organizations & Social capital base
8 Capacity Building (participation, training,awareness of watershed community
9 Others (specify)
CHAPTER – 4
Institutional Building and Project Management i) Self Help Group
Self-help groups are motivated, small homogeneous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self-
help group initiatives especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self-help groups include landless and
poor women.
Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women,
which came up with the following observations:
46
a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.
b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders
c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people
d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.
With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area, it was planned to have some capacity
building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote
women empowerment.
User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The
user group collect user suggestions from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.
It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and having a feeling of ownership with
community spirit.
The details of Self Help Group in the project area are given in Table 4.1
Table No. 4.1 Details of SHGs & UGs newly formed under IWMP: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Sl. No.
Type of Group
Total no. of CBOs No. of members No. of ST in
each category
No. of SC in each
category
No. of Others in
each category
No. of BPL in each
category
Bank linkage
With only Men
With only
Women
With both Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total
No. of SHGs
Amount (Rs)
47
1 SHG
(i) Landless
(ii) MF
(iii) SF
(iv) LF
Total
2 UGs
(i) Landless
(ii) MF
(iii) SF
(iv) LF
Total
*Account no. of Watershed Committee, PIA.
ii) Watershed Committee (WC)
Watershed committee (WC) was constituted by the village councils to implement the watershed project with technical
support of WDT in the Village. This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of
the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid factionary. A
watershed committee was formed accordingly in Derajuri watershed. As the watershed is covering ten villages; so,
separate watershed sub-committees were formed in the villages. Capacity building training to the watershed committee
is given by WDT.
48
The watershed committee has key role to play during and after the project implementation period.
The details of Watershed Committee in the project area are given in Table 4.2
4.2: Details of Watershed Committees (WC)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Name of
WCs
Date of Registration as a Society
(dd/mm/ yyyy)
No. of members in
WC Designation Name
M/F
SC ST SF MF LF Land-less UG SHG GP Any
other Educl qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
Write “Yes” if applicable
President
Secretary
Member
Member
Member
(NOTE- Member wise details of SHGs, UGs & Watershed Committee has to be enclosed as annexures. The details includes the Name, Husband name and Caste)
In column 18 only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.
A. PNP and PRA B. Planning
C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments
E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation
G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed
49
I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).
Table No 4.3: WDT Particulars: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S.No
Names of WDT members M/F# Age Qualification /
Experience Description of
professional training Role/ Function*
*In column 7 only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.
A. PNP and PRA B. Planning
C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments
E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation
G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed
I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).
Table No. 4.4: PIA particulars 1 2 3
S.No Particulars Details of PIA
50
1. Type of organization#
2. Name of organization
3. Designation & Address
4. Telephone
5. Fax
6. E-mail
# In column no. 8.1.6 (1), only the letter assigned to each type, as given below, needs to be typed.
A Line Dept. B Autonomous organization
C Govt. Institute D Research Bodies
E Zila Parishad F Intermediate Panchayat
G Voluntary Organisations H Any other (please specify).
Table No. 4.5 Bank Account Details Name of WC/PIA Name of the
Bank/Place Account No. Name of the
Signatory Address
Institutional Mechanisms: (Enclose the following documents)
4.6.1 Flow Chart of Institutional Arrangement from District to watershed level
51
4.6.2 Fund Flow mechanisms – flow chart,
4.6.3 List of Watershed Records to be maintained
Documents of Agreements: 4.7.1) Watershed Committee Registration certificate
4.7.2 MoU – PIA – DWDU, PIA – WC
4.7.3 Resolution of Gram Sabha ,Aam Sabha, WC approving action plan#
#the resolution should be done village wise and needs to be approved in Gram/Aam Sabha
52
4.8 Project Implementation Project Implementation Strategy including coordination and monitoring of implementation process, DWDU and other coordination mechanism. (Describe in detail ).
Table No. 4.8 Convergence plan with IWMP: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S. No. Names of Departments
with Schemes converging with IWMP
Name of activity/task/structure proposed under convergence
Period of Support
(Years)
Reference no. of activity/ task/
structure in DPR
Estimated Fund
Proposed Under
Convergence (in Rs.)
Level of decision taken
for convergence
Block/district
(a) Structures
(b) livelihoods
(c) Capacity Building
(d) Any other (pl. specify)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
53
10 Total
54
CHAPTER – 5
Management/Action Plan
Methodology of plan adopted for Preparation of DPR
a) Awareness generation interventions: Mass Meetings and awareness meetings were organized covering each and
every village under the project area by the Project Implementing Agency.
b) Initial Orientation program: Initial orientation on concept of the watershed, concept of integrated watershed management
programme of the government of India importance of peoples participating in planning, execution and social monitoring of the
programme as well in post project maintenance of the project interventions were clarified to the people of the watershed,
Panchayati raj Institution members, village headman and other peoples representatives.
c) Participatory Rural appraisal: Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing and monitoring
and post-withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource
mapping, Social mapping and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the
villages of the project area in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in this process the
villagers define their problem and prioritized the activities for selecting interventions.
d) Focused Group Discussions: It is a process by which a homogeneity group comes to a platform to discus their issues
and share their issues and share their counter solution to their issues. It may be farmers’ community, women, landless
people, BPL and others. A structured questionnaire was filled and analyzed for Project planning and Implementations.
e) House Hold Survey: To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts as benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A
55
detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved household survey, bio-physical survey and village level data collection from door to door survey that includes a detailed structured questionnaire which have been filled by surveyor/enumerator by interacting with the household head in the village. This gave in a details of demographic profile, the literacy percentage, S.T/S.C Population, Number of BPL, Cattle population, availability of amenities in the village like drinking water, education , communication banking and marking facilities, income and expenditure pattern of the village as well as of the project area.
f) Technical Survey: A technical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village/project area. It included the soil typology, well/ponds etc, crops taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used, agricultural implements used and various sources of irrigation in the field problem typology of the project area: based upon which the future interventions were planned in consultation with the stakeholders, watershed committees etc.
g) Formation process –Ugs & Watershed Committee:
1. Watershed Committees are formed as per Common Guidelines for Watershed Development 2008 issued by the Government of India by the project Implementing Agency.
2. Users groups (UGs) were indentified during participatory Rural Exercises, gram sabhas, from amongst the stakeholders of the intervention identified.
h) Secondary data collection:
i)Secondary data on satellite imageries were collected and interpretated in GIS environment.
ii) watersheds, Micro Watersheds were delineated
iii) Slope map/ Contour map were prepared with the help of Topo sheets , SRTM data
iv) Climatic data such as Rainfall, Relative Humidity, Maximum and minimum temperature etc were collected for the period from 1-4-2006 to 31-3-11 from the Indian Meteorological Department Government of India.
v) Ground water level, Quality of ground water, Chemical data on shallow aquifers etc were collected from the Central Ground Board, Government of India.
vi) Comprehensive District Agriculture plan (C-DAP) was collected from the District Agriculture office andwas consulted
vii) soil Maps were collected from the National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planing (NBSSLUP) Jorhat Regional Centre
56
as well data available with District Agriculture office and zonal Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK).
3.Planning Process- Social Economic Survey was conducted in each and every house hold. Detailed Participatory Rural Appraisal exercises were conducted in each village under the project area with the farmers, Watershed Development Team members, Project Implementing Agency, Panchayati Raj Institution member, Public representative and thread bares discussions were held, social mappings were done and problems and resources of the villages were analyzed, recorded the needs and suggestions of the stake holders and accordingly interventions suitable to meet the problem typology were identified.
4. Mapping- Social mapping were done in the PRA exercises. Detailed maps were prepared in GIFS environment on watershed delineation, village boundaries, Land use Land cover maps, Drainage maps, Slope maps, contour maps, Treatment maps etc were prepared GPS locations of identified interventions were marked in maps.
5. Hydro-geological Survey- Hydro geological survey prepared by the central ground water board was consulted.
6. Public- Private partnership- The intervention would be implemented by watershed committee through the users groups. Special attention was given on the weaker section of the society such as land less, women and People below poverty line (BPL)
7. Consolidation & preparation Of DPR document- The Detailed Project Report has been prepared comprising the three phases namely preparatory phase-one year. Work phase three years and the Consolidation phase in one year. Thus the implementation of project would be completed in five years. The year wise phasing of detailed in the chapter of Budgeting and Programme implementation.
8. Approve by Village Level Development Council/ Gram Sabha- Activities proposed by villages/stakeholders during PRA exercises are proposed in the DPR on priority basis and availability of fund.
57
5.2 Details of Natural Resource Management Activities
Table No. 5.2.1 Soil and Moisture Conservation structures 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sl. No
.
Name of the Activities
(Structures)
MWS
No.
Name of the Hamlet /
Village
Plot Numbers ( including
Name of the local Patch)
Name of Beneficiari
es
Area (in Ha)/
Dimension ( in M/
Sq. M / CuM) of
Structure
Unit Cost*
Total Cost
Contribution **
Total Grant Amount
Year of Implementation
(1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th)
In Rs (Rs in Lakh.)
(Rs in Lakh) ( Rs in Lakh)
1
Land Developme
nt by construction of counter
bund.
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
5.0Ha/
2055.12 rm
127.00
2.61 0.1305 2.4795 2nd, 4th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
5.0Ha/ 2055.12
rm 2.61 0.1305 2.4795 2nd, 4th Year
Bilandi Gaon
Bilandi Gaon
9.0 Ha/3771.6
5 rm 4.79 0.2395 4.5505 2nd, 4th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon
6.0 ha/3086.6
1 rm 3.92 0.196 3.724 2nd, 4th, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon
Thongja Gaon
3.0 ha/1543.3
1 rm 1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
2.0 ha/1543.3
1 rm 1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
3.2 ha/1716.5
4 rm 2.18 0.109 2.071 2nd, 4th, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
3.4 ha/1543.3
1 rm 1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon
Kabung Gaon
2.7 ha/1543.3
1 rm 1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
3.3
ha/1543.31 rm
1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
3.4 ha/1370.1
rm 1.74 0.087 1.653 2nd, 4th Year
58
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
2.9 ha/1165.3
5 rm 1.48 0.074 1.406 2nd, 4th, 5th Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
2.6 ha/1196.9
rm 1.52 0.076 1.444 2nd, 4th, 5th Year
Sub Total 14081.7 30.65 1.5325 29.1175
2 Bench Terracing
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
0.3636 ha
165000/ha
0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon
Bilandi Gaon
0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon
0.97 ha 1.60 0.08 1.52 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon
Thongja Gaon
0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon
Kabung Gaon
0.291 ha 0.48 0.024 0.456 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
0.291 ha 0.48 0.024 0.456 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
0.291 ha 0.48 0.024 0.456 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Sub Total 62 8.44 0.422 8.018
59
3 Nalla Bund
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
24.71 rm
850.00
0.21 0.01065 0.20235 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon 32.94 rm 0.28 0.0142 0.2698 2nd, 3rd Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon 32.94 rm 0.28 0.0142 0.2698 2nd, 3rd Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon 16.47 rm 0.14 0.0071 0.1349 2nd, 3rd Year
Sub Total 26 0.91 0.04615 0.87685
4 Boulder Pitching
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
0
780/m2
0 0 0
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
0 0 0 0
Bilandi Gaon
Bilandi Gaon
0 0 0 0
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon
0 0 0 0
Thongja Gaon
Thongja Gaon
0 0 0 0
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
0 0 0 0
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
0 0 0 0
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
0 0 0 0
Kabung Gaon
Kabung Gaon
0 0 0 0
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
0 0 0 0
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon 0 0 0 0
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
0 0 0 0
60
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
319.23 m2 2.49 0.1245 2.3655 3rd, 5th Year
Sub Total 319.23 2.49 0.1245 2.3655
TOTAL of SMC 42.503 2.1252 40.3778
5 *N.B. - As per Govt. specified rate.
**N.B. – 5% 0f total grant.
61
Table No. 5.2.2 Water Harvesting Structures 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sl. No
.
Name of the
Activities (Structures
)
MWS
No.
Name of the Hamlet /
Village
Plot Numbers ( including
Name of the local Patch)
Name of Beneficiarie
s
Area (in Ha)/
Dimension ( in
M/ Sq. M / CuM) of Structure
Unit Cost*
Total Cost
Contribution**
Total Grant
Amount
Year of Implementation
(1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th)
In Rs (Rs in Lakh.) (Rs in Lakh) ( Rs in
Lakh)
1
R.C.C Water
Harvesting Structure
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
12.23 sq m
53700.00
6.567 0.32835 6.23865 3rd Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon
8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year
Thongja Gaon
Thongja Gaon
8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
3.87 sq m 2.08 0.104 1.976 3rd Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year
Kabung Gaon
Kabung Gaon
12.23 sq m 6.567 0.32835 6.23865 3rd Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
8.77 sq m 4.71 0.2355 4.4745 3rd Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
9.11 sq m 4.89 0.2445 4.6455 3rd Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
9.11 sq m 4.89 0.2445 4.6455 3rd Year
Sub Total 113.7 m2 61.064 3.0532 58.0108
62
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
1215.19 m2
158.00
1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
2 Excavated Pond
Thongja Gaon
Thongja Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon
Kabung Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year
Sub Total 15797.47
m2 24.96 1.248 23.712
3 Brick Channel
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
272 rm
2000.00
5.44 0.272 5.168 4th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon 272 rm 5.44 0.272 5.168 4th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 272 rm 5.44 0.272 5.168 4th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon 136 rm 2.72 0.136 2.584 4th Year
63
Thongja Gaon
Thongja Gaon 136 rm 2.72 0.136 2.584 4th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon 170 rm 3.4 0.17 3.23 4th,5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon 170 rm 3.4 0.17 3.23 4th,5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
136 rm 2.72 0.136 2.584 4th Year
Kabung Gaon
Kabung Gaon
170 rm 3.4 0.17 3.23 4th,5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
136 rm 2.72 0.136 2.584 4th Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
102 rm 2.04 0.102 1.938 4th,5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
807 rm 16.14 0.807 15.333 4th,5th Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
930.5 m 18.61 0.9305 17.6795 4th,5th Year
Sub Total 74.19 3.7095 70.4805
TOTAL OF WH STRUCTURE 160.21
4 8.0107 152.2033
*N.B. - As per Govt. specified rate.
**N.B. – 5% 0f total grant.
64
Table No. 5.2.2.1 Vegetative Covers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sl. No.
Name of the Activities
(Structures)
MWS No.
Name of the Hamlet /
Village
Plot Numbers ( including
Name of the local Patch)
Name of Beneficiaries
Area (in Ha)/
Dimension ( in M/ Sq. M / CuM)
of Structure
Unit Cost* Total Cost Contribution** Total Grant
Amount Year of
Implementation (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th)
In Rs (Rs in Lakh.) (Rs in Lakh) ( Rs in
Lakh)
1 Agro-forestry
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
2.9 ha
120000.00
3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon
2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Sub Total 45.24 2.262 42.978
65
2 Fuel wood
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
2.7 ha
30000.000
0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon
2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
3
Sub Total 39 ha 10.53 5.27 5.27
Pasture Development
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
0.87 ha
37600.00
0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon 0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
66
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Sub Total 4.29 0.21 4.08
4 Turmeric Cultivation
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
0.76 ha
130000.00
0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon
0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 0.76 ha 0.79 0.04 0.75 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
67
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso
0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Sub Total 12.67 0.63 12.04
5 Ginger Cultivation
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
0.875 ha
120000.00
1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon
Dera Arlok Gaon
0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon
Chek Artur Gaon
0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Waham Langso
Waham Langso 0.875 ha 0.84 0.042 0.798 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year
Sub Total 13.44 0.672 12.768
TOTAL OF VEGETATIVE COVER 86.17
TOTAL OF NRM(56%) 288.887
*N.B. - As per Govt. specified rate.
68
**N.B. – 5% 0f total grant.
Table No. 5.2.2.2 Livelihood IWMP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sl. No.
Name of the Activities
(Structures) MWS Name of the Hamlet
/ Village
Plot Numbers ( including Name
of the local Patch)
Name of Beneficiaries
Area (in Ha)/
Dimension ( in M/ Sq. M / CuM)
of Structure
Unit Cost*
Total Cost Contribution**
Total Grant
Amount Year of
Implementation (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th)
In Rs (Rs in Lakh.) (Rs in Lakh) ( Rs in
Lakh)
1 Cycle
Repairing Tools
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
0 0 0 0
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon 1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year
Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year
69
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
0 0 0 0
Waham Langso Waham Langso
0 0 0 0
Sub Total 10 4 0.2 3.8
2 Carpenter
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 3rd Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
2 nos 0.48 0.024 0.456 3rd, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 3rd Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
2 nos 0.48 0.024 0.456 3rd, 4th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
0 0 0 0
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year
Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
0 0 0 0
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
0 0 0 0
Waham Langso Waham Langso
0 0 0 0
Sub Total 11 2.64 0.132 2.508
3 Goatery MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
3 unit
0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 4th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
5 unit 1.46 0.073 1.39 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 3 unit 0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 4th Year
70
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
3 unit 25000.00
0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 4 unit 1 0.050 0.95 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
5 unit 1.33 0.067 1.26 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
3 unit 0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
4 unit 1 0.050 0.95 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 3 unit 0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 4th Year Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
4 unit 1 0.050 0.95 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
3 unit 0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
3 unit 0.63 0.032 0.60 3rd, 5th Year
Waham Langso Waham Langso
4 unit 0.8 0.040 0.76 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Sub Total 11.18 0.559 10.62
4 Hatchery & Poultry
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon 19 nos 1.9 0.095 1.805 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th
Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 17 nos 2 0.1 1.9 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
17 nos 1.7 0.085 1.615 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
17 nos 1.7 0.085 1.615 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
71
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
7 nos 0.7 0.035 0.665 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Waham Langso Waham Langso
2 nos 0.2 0.01 0.19 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Sub Total 163 16.6 0.83 15.77
5 Piggery
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 4th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
0 0 0 0
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 0 0 0 0
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 0 0 0 0
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
0 0 0 0
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
0 0 0 0
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
0 0 0 0
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 0 0 0 0 Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 4th Year
Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
0 0 0 0
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 4th Year
Waham Langso Waham Langso
1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 2nd Year
72
Sub Total 5 nos 5 0.25 4.75
6 Weaving
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon
Artu Bonglong Gaon
2 nos 1 0.05 0.95 3rd, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon
Derajuri Killing Gaon
2 nos 1 0.05 0.95 3rd, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 3rd, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 4th year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 4th year
Ingti Basapo Gaon
Ingti Basapo Gaon
1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 4th year
Dera Nihang Gaon
Dera Nihang Gaon
1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 4th year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon
Thervecherop Gaon
2 nos 1 0.05 0.95 3rd, 4th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 2 nos 1 0.05 0.95 3rd, 4th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 3rd, 4th Year
Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
0 0 0 0 3rd, 4th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon
Harlongsora Gaon
0 0 0 7 3rd, 4th Year
Waham Langso Waham Langso
0 0 0.00 0.00 3rd, 4th Year
Sub Total 14 7 0.35 13.65 TOTAL 46.42
*N.B. - As per Govt. specified rate.
**N.B. – 5% 0f total grant.
73
Table No. 5.2.2.3 (Production System) Karbi Anglong (Derajuri) IWMP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sl. No. Name of the
Activities (Structures)
MWS Name of the Hamlet /
Village
Plot Numbers ( including
Name of the local Patch)
Name of Beneficiaries
Area (in Ha)/
Dimension ( in M/ Sq.
M / CuM) of Structur
e
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Contribution
Total Grant Amou
nt Year of
Implementation (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/
5th) In Rs
(Rs in Lakh.
)
(Rs in Lakh)
( Rs in Lakh)
1
Horticulture Plantation
(Assam Lemon)
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon Artu Bonglong Gaon
3.86 ha
56000.00
2.16 0.108 2.052
3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon Derajuri Killing Gaon
3.86 ha 2.16 0.108 2.052
3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon
3.86 ha 2.16 0.108 2.052
3rd, 4th, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
74
Dera Nihang Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon Thervecherop Gaon
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon Harlongsora Gaon
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Waham Langso Waham Langso
4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Sub Total 30.28 1.514 28.76
6
2 Pineapple Plantation
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon Artu Bonglong Gaon
1.53 ha
163,000.00
2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon Derajuri Killing Gaon
1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon
1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
1.025 ha 1.67 0.0835 1.5865 2nd, 5th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon
1.025 ha 1.67 0.0835 1.5865 2nd, 5th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon
1.025 ha 1.67 0.0835 1.5865 2nd, 5th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon
1.025 ha 1.67 0.0835 1.5865 2nd, 5th Year
MWS 3 Thervecherop Gaon Thervecher
op Gaon 1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th
Year
75
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon
1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon Harlongsora Gaon
1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Waham Langso Waham Langso
1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year
Sub Total 29.18 1.459 27.721
3 Areca nut Plantation
MWS 1
Artu Bonglong Gaon Artu Bonglong Gaon
0.78 ha
40000.00
0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year
Derajuri Killing Gaon Derajuri Killing Gaon
0.78 ha 0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year
Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon
0.78 ha 0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year
MWS 2
Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon
1.55 ha 0.62 0.031 0.589 3rd, 4th Year
Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 1.55 ha 0.62 0.031 0.589 3rd, 4th Year
Ingti Basapo Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon
1.55 ha 0.62 0.031 0.589 3rd, 4th Year
Dera Nihang Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon
1.55 ha 0.62 0.031 0.589 3rd, 4th Year
MWS 3
Thervecherop Gaon Thervecherop Gaon
2.33 ha 0.93 0.0465 0.8835 2nd, 3rd, 4th Year
Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon
2.33 ha 0.93 0.0465 0.8835 2nd, 3rd, 4th Year
Barman Pangcho Gaon
Barman Pangcho Gaon
2.33 ha 0.93 0.0465 0.8835 2nd, 3rd, 4th Year
76
Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon
2.33 ha 0.93 0.0465 0.8835 2nd, 3rd, 4th Year
MWS 4
Harlongsora Gaon Harlongsora Gaon
0.78 ha 0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year
Waham Langso Waham Langso
0.78 ha 0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year
Sub Total 7.75 0.3875 7.3625
GRAND TOTAL 51.58
5.3: Structure or Activity Wise Details of Engineering Structure and Vegetative Measures ( Derajuri IWMP)
Table No.5.3.1: Engineering structures for Soil Conservation Measures (SMC) (M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)
1 2 3 4
S. No. Name of structures
Proposed plan
Area (ha) Farmers Total units
(No./ cu.m./ rmt) UNIT COST
(Rs) Estimated cost* (Rs. in lakh)
Farmers contribution (Rs. in lakh)
Grant Portion (Rs. in lakh)
M W O T
A PRIVATE LAND
i Land Development 127.00/m 29.73 0.9195 30.65 1.5325 30.65
ii Bench Terracing 165000.00/ha 8.187 0.2532 8.44 0.422 8.44
iii Nalla Bund 850.00/m 0.8827 0.273 0.91 0.455 0.91
Sub Total A 38.7997 1.4457 40 2.4095 40
B COMMON LAND
Boulder Pitching 780.00/m2 1.494 0.9213 0.0747 2.49 2.49
77
Sub Total B 1.494 0.9213 0.0747 2.49 2.49
Total (A+B) 1.494 39.721 1.5204 42.49 2.4095 42.49
5.3.2: Details of engineering structures for Water Harvesting /WHS M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total
1 2 3 4
S. No. Name of structures
Proposed plan
Total unit (No./cu.m./rmt)
UNIT COST Estimated cost* Farmers
(Rs) (Rs. in lakh) contribution Grant
(Rs) (Rs)
M W O T
A PRIVATE LAND
A1 Individual structures
i. Pond 158.00/m2 24.2112 0.7488 24.96 1.248 24.96 Sub Total (A1) 24.2112 0.7488 24.96 1.248 24.96
A2 Common structures
i. Brick Channel 2000.00/m 44.514 27.4503 2.226 74.19 3.7095 74.19
Subtotal (A2) 44.514 27.4503 2.226 74.19 3.7095 74.19
78
Subtotal (A) 44.514 51.6615 2.9748 99.15 4.9575 99.15
B COMMON LAND
i. R.C.C. Water Harvesting Structure 53700.00/m2 36.6384 22.5934 1.8319 61.064 3.0532 61.064
Sub total (B) 36.6384 22.5934 1.8319 61.064 3.0532 61.064
Total (A+B) 81.1524 74.2549 4.8067 160.214 8.0107 160.214
Table No. 5.3.3: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works* 1 2 3 4
S. No. Name of structure/ work
Proposed plan
Area (ha) No. of plants
Unit Cost
(Rs)
Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)
Farmer Contribution (Rs. in lakh)
Grant (Rs. in lakh)
i Agro Forestry 120000.00/ha 45.24 2.262 45.24
ii Fuel Wood 30000.00/ha 10.53 0.5265 10.53
iii Pature Development 37600.00/ha 4.29 0.2145 4.29
iv Turmeric Cultivation 130000.00/ha 12.67 0.6335 12.67
79
v Ginger Cultivation 120000.00/ha 13.44 0.672 13.44
Total Of Vegetative Covers
86.17 4.3085 86.17
Total Of NRM
Activities
288.874 14.7287 288.874
80
Chapter 6
Capacity Building Plan . Capacity Building:
Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the
insights, knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change.
There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions
by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success ( e , g . in the form of commodities,
good and service ) to take in to account improvements to human potential, Capacity building of stakeholders is also
increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all
levels for effective implementation of projects.
Scope of capacity building at Derajuri village
Alternative land use plan
Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation
Improved and scientific agriculture practices
Fodder development and management
Afforestation
Meteorological Information
Dairy Development and management
Rural Craft
81
Income Generation Activities
Stitching
Food processing
Post harvest management Practices
Table No. 6.1 Details of Capacity Building 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Sl. No.
Name of the Training & Exposure ( Knowledge, Skill, etc. at both Being
and Doing level)
Number of
events
Number of Participants in an event
Total Number of days
per event
Total Traineedays (= 3 x 4 x 5)
Cost per Traineeday
(in Rs)
Total Cost required for
the programme (= 6 x7 ; in
Rs.)
Total Grant
Amount (in Rs)
Year of Implementation
(1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th)
Monitoring Indicators
SHG/ UG / WC / PI related 1 WC 3 10 4 120 1st/2nd/3rd/4th
2 PI 2 6 2 24 To Be Prepared 3 SHG 5 25 4 500 4 UG 6 25 4 600 5 SHG Exposure Visits 4 30 4 480
Subtotal NRM related
1 Water Harvesting Structure 3 30 3 270 1st/2nd/3rd/4th
2 Soil Moisture Conservation 4 30 3 360 To be
approved by DWDU
3 Vegetative Covers 4 10 3 120 4 Agronomics 3 30 3 270
Subtotal Production Enhancement related
1 Improve Agronomic Practise 5 25 3 375 1st/2nd/3rd/4th
2 Exposure Visit 4 48 4 768 To be
82
3 Plantation Practice 4 20 3 approved by DWDU
Subtotal Livelihoods / Micro-enterprises related 1 Veterinary etc. 6 30 3 540 1st/2nd/3rd/4th 2 Fishery etc. 5 30 3 450 To be
approved by DWDU
3 Vermi compost/ compost pits 4 30 2 240
Subtotal Convergence / Rights & entitlement / Well Being related 1 Convergences 4 20 1 80 1st/2nd/3rd/4th 2 Rights & Entitlement 4 50 2 400 To be
approved by DWDU
3 Sharing & Usufructs 4 50 2 400 4 Wellbeing Related 9 50 1 450
Subtotal For PIA / WDT staffs level 1 PIA 3 10 4 120 To be
approved by DWDU
1st/2nd/3rd/4th
2 WDT 6 6 4 144
Subtotal Others TOT/CRP/CSP/Related 4 6 4 96 1st/2nd/3rd/4th TOT/Others 4 50 3 600
District Level Workshop 8 4 6 192
Training Outside state 9 5 3 135 State Level Workshop
Subtotal GRAND TOTAL 22.80
83
Chapter 7
Phasing of Programme and Budgeting *Please refer to the “Fund Utilization pattern component wise in % under IWMP” letter attached in the Annexure.
Table No. 7.1: Phasing of the action plan
Table 7.1 Phasing of Action Plan- Natural Resource Management Activities, Karbi Anglong (Derajuri) IWMP
( MWS 1.3B2C1i2b)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity unit
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (No/m3/rm)
(Rs in Lakh)
1 Artu
Bonglong Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 1373.2
3 m 174400 0 0 2055.12 m 261600
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 ha 60000
Nalla Bund Rm 850 6.26 m 8875 6.26 m 8875 0 0 1.25
m 8165 5.35 21300
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
84
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 12.23 656775 0 0 0 0 12.23 656775
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 272 544000 0 0 272 544000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
2 Derajuri Killing Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 1373.2
3 m 174400 0 0 2055.12 m 261600
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 60000
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348 448275
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 272 544000 0 0 272 544000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
85
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
3 Bilandi Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 1373.2
3 m 174400 1716.54 218000 3771.65
m 479600
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 60000
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348
448275
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 272 544000 0 0 272 544000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
Sub total- 883732.50 2621857.5
0 2155200.00 1287065.
00 6947855.00
86
( MWS 2-3B2C1i1d) 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity GPS
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
4 Dera Arlok Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6
1 m 87200 1716.
54 218000 3.89.76 m 392400
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 60000
Nalla Bund Rm 850.00 8.35 7100 8.35 7100 0 0 16.70 14200 33.411 28400 Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348
448275
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 0 0 136 272000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0
0.907
27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
87
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
5 Thongja Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 858.27 m
109000.00 0 0 686.6
1 m 87200 0 0 1544.88
m 196200
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 60000
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348
448275
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 0 0 136 272000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
6 Ingti
Basapo Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6
1 m 87200 171.6
5 m 21800 1544.88 m 196200
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 60000
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
88
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348
448275
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 34 68000 170 340000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0
0.907
27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
7 Dera
Nihang Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 858.27 m
109000.00 0 0 686.6
1 m 87200 171.6
5 m 21800 1716.54 218000
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 2 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 60000
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 3.882 208500 0 0 0 0 3.882 208500
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 34 68000 170 340000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
89
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
Sub total- 1221910.00 2978035.0
0 1436800.00 1823020.
00 7459765.00
(MWS 3 -3B2C1i2a ) 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity GPS
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
8 Thervecherop Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6
1 m 87200 171.6
5 m 21800 1544.88 m 196200
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 60000
Nalla Bund Rm 355.00 4.6 3905 6.47 5502.5 0 0 9.19 7810 18.37 15620 Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348
448275
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 0 0 136 272000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
90
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
9 Kabung Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6
1 m 87200 171.6
5 m 21800 1544.88 m 196200
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.073 ha
12000 0 0 0.145 ha 24000 0.291 48000
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 12.23 656775 0 0 0 0 12.23 656775
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 34 68000 170 340000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.152 19800 0 0 0.305 39600 0.609 79200
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
10 Barman Pangcho
Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6
1 m 87200 171.6
5 m 21800 1544.88 m 196200
91
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 60000
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348
448275
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 0 0 136 272000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
11 Chek Artur Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6
1 m 87200 0 0 1373.23
m 174400
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.073 ha
12000 0 0 0.145 ha 24000 0.291 48000
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 8.774 471210 0 0 0 0 8.774 471210
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 68 136000 34 68000 102 204000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
92
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.
00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
Sub total 1178310.00 3405445.0
0 1300800.00 1626820.
00 7511375.00
(MWS4-3B2C1i1c)
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity GPS
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
12 Harlongsora Gaon
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 655.12 m 83200 0 0 343.31
m 43600 171.65 m 21800 1170.08
m 148599.7
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.073 ha
12000 0 0 0.145 ha 24000 0.291 48000
Nalla Bund Rm 355.00 0.42 355 0.42 355 0 0 0.84 710 1.68 1420 Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 9.124 489975 0 0 0 0 9.124 489975
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
93
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 68 136000 816 1632000 884 1768000
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29
8 11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000
13 Waham Langso
Land Development by construction of counter bund.
Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 343.31
m 43600 171.65 m 21800 1201.57
m 152600
Bench Terracing Ha 165000.
0 0.073
ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145
ha 24000 0.3636 ha 60000
Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 231.46 166500 0 0 106.7
3 83250 320.19 249750
R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure
M2 of H/W
53700.00
0 0.00 9.124 489975 0 0 0 0 9.124 489975
Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5
9 96000 1215.18 192000
Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 150.28 300560 780.3 1560600 930.58 1861160
Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0
0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000
Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90
7 27200 2.721 81600
Pasture Development
Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0
0.298
11200 0.894 33600
Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.
00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000
Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000 0.175 21000.00 0.175 21000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.7 84000
94
Sub total:- 585155.00 1825805.0
0 523760.00 4032160.0
0 6966879.70
Total: 3869107.50 10831142.
50 5416560.00 8769065.0
0 28885874.70
( MWS 1.3B2C1i2b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity Unit
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
1 Artu
Bonglong Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 24000 1 24000
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 0 0 2.666 66670 Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 0 0 12 120000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 100000 0 0 1 100000
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 0 0 0 0 1 50000
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Derajuri Killing Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 1 24000.00 0 0 0 0 1 24000 2 48000
Goatery unit 25000.00 1.333 33335.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.866 46669 5.866 146674
95
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 7 70000 19 190000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 0 0 1 50000 2 100000
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Bilandi Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 24000 1 24000
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 0 0 2.666 66670 Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 0 0 12 120000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 0 0 0 0 1 50000
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub total 117335.00 480005.00 350005.00 238669.00 1186014.00
( MWS 2-3B2C1i1d)
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity Unit
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
96
4 Dera Arlok Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 0 0 1.333 33335 2.666 66670
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 0 0 5 50000 12 120000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 100000 1 100000
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Thongja Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33
3 33335 3.999 100005
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 5 50000 17 170000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Ingti Basapo Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 1 24000.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 2 48000
Goatery unit 25000.00 1.333 33335.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33
3 33335 5.332 133340
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 5 50000 17 170000
97
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Dera Nihang Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 0 0 1.333 33335 2.666 66670
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 0 0 5 50000 12 120000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub total 137335.00 493340.00 438670.00 433340.00 1502685.0
0 (MWS 3 -3B2C1i2a )
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity Unit
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
8 Thervecherop Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33
3 33335 3.999 100005
98
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 5 50000 17 170000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 1 50000 0 0 2 100000
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Kabung Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 0 0 2.666 66670
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 0 0 12 120000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 1 50000 0 0 2 100000
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Barman Pangcho
Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33
3 33335 3.999 100005
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 0 0 5 50000 5 50000 12 120000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 100000 0 0 1 100000
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000
99
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Chek Artur Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 0 0 1.333 33335 2.666 66670
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 0 0 5 50000 5 50000 12 120000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total 80000.00 493340.00 622005.00 250005.00 1445350.00
(MWS4-3B2C1i1c)
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity Unit
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
12 Harlongsora Gaon
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 0 0 1.333 33335 2.666 66670
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 0 0 0 0 5 50000 7 70000
100
Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 100000 0 0 1 100000
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Waham Langso
Cycle Repairing
Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33
3 13334 3.999 80004
Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20000
Piggery No. 100,000.00 1 100000.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100000
Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fingerlings to be
Spread upon in existing Fishery.
No. 5 8400 42000.00 2750 13750 600 3000 2700 13500 14450 72250
Sub Total 182000.00 80420.00 136335.00 110169.00 508924.00
Total 516670.00 1547105.0
0 1547015.00 1032183.0
0 4642973.00
Table 7.1 Phasing of Action Plan- Production System, Karbi Anglong-23 (Derajuri) IWMP
( MWS 1.3B2C1i2b)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity Unit
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
101
1 Artu
Bonglong Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 3.870 216750
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0.51
2 83500 1.536 250500
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.775 31000
2 Derajuri Killing Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 3.870 216750
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0.51
2 83500 1.536 250500
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0 0 0 0 0
0.775 0.775 31000
3 Bilandi Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 3.870 216750
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0.51
2 83500 1.536 250500
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.775 31000
Sub total 93000.00 467250.00 467250.00 467250.00 1494750.00
( MWS 2-3B2C1i1d)
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity unit
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
4 Dera Arlok Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500 0.512 83500
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.77
5 31000 0 0 0.775 31000
5 Thongja Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425
102
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0.512 83500.00 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500 1.024 167000
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.77
5 31000 0 0 0.775 31000
6 Ingti Basapo Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0.512 83500.00 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500 1.024 167000
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0.775 31000 0.77
5 31000 0 0 1.55 62000
7 Dera Nihang Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500 0.512 83500
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.77
5 31000 0 0 0.775 31000
Sub total 253700.00 320000.00 413000.00 623000.00 1609700.0
0
(MWS 3 -3B2C1i2a )
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity Unit
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
8 Thervecherop Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 3.870 216750
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0 0 1.024 167000
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.62 24800.00 0 0 0.77
5 31000 0 0 1.395 55800
9 Kabung Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0.51
2 83500 1.536 250500
103
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0 0 0.77
5 31000 0 0 1.55 62000
10 Barman Pangcho
Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0.775 31000 0.93 37200 0 0 1.655 99200
11 Chek Artur Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29
0 72250 0 0 2.580 144500
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0.775 31000 0 0 0 0 0.775 31000
Sub total 130150.00 685000.00 555200.00 300250.00 1670600.0
0
(MWS4-3B2C1i1c)
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12
Sl. No. Name of Village Activity Unit
Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total
In Rs Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin Phy (No)
Fin
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
12 Harlongsora Gaon
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.309 17340.00 0 0 1.39
4 78030 1.290 72250 2.993 167620
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Waham Langso
Horticulture
Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.405 22686.50 1.341 75140 0 0 1.50
9 84532.5 3.256 182359
Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0
0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.84 33604 0 0 0.84 33604
Sub total 40026.50 75140.00 111634.00 156782.50 383583.00
104
Total 516876.50 1547390.0
0 1547084.00 1547282.5
0 5158633.00
Table No. 7.2 Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio
S.No.
Name of the
activity
Total Cost
Total Benefit expecte
d * BCR Remarks
(Rs.in Lakh)
(Rs. In Lakh)
105
EPA 22.38 30
01:01.2
NRM 313.32 367.2 PE 55.95 65
Livelihood for Asset less
50.355 60
Institution and Capacity building
27.975 30
Overall 469.98 552.2 *kindly relate this with table no. 9.2 (expected outcomes)
106
Table No. 7.2 Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio S.No. Name of the activity Total Cost (Rs.) Total Benefit
expected *
(Rs.)
BCR
Remarks
EPA
NRM
PE
Livelihood for Asset less
Institution and Capacity building
Overall
*kindly relate this with table no. 9.2 (expected outcomes)
107
Chapter 8
Consolidation and completion of various works
Table No. 8.1: Consolidation of Action Plan
1 2 Implementation Phase Consolidation/exit Phase
S. No
Component 1 year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year
Phy
(No)
Fin
(Rs.)
Phy
(No)
Fin
(Rs.)
Phy
(No)
Fin
(Rs.)
Phy
(No)
Fin
(Rs.)
Phy (No) Fin (Rs.)
1 Entry Point Activities (4%)
2 DPR Preparation by
PIA(1%)
2 Institution & Capacity Building (5%)
SLNA-0.3%
DWDU-0.9%
108
PIA-3.8%
3 Productivity Enhancement
(13%)
4 Livelihoods for Assetless
(10%)
5 Natural Resource Management (50 %)
6 Monitoring (1%)
7 Evaluation (1 %)
8 Consolidation phase (5%)
9 Administration (10 %)
109
CHAPTER – 9
EXPECTED OUTCOMES 9.1 Employment
Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture,
animal husbandry and casual labour work. However, rainfall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at
best they can take only a single crop, which keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes
animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them engaged full time. Thus, the people
mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it.
The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self-employment opportunities. Wage employment would
be created by engaging people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village
pond, plantation etc. self-employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct
livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development.
9.1.2. Migration
Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well off farmers bring fodder from
Diphu (approximately 22 kms away) and Hamren (approximately 35 kms away) collectively; but the resource poor
cannot afford it. On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of
the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour.
110
Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.
9.1.3. Ground water table
Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus
depleted over years. Presently it stands at 5.8 m.
Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in increasing water table depth from 5.8
m in the pre-project level to 5.3 m in the post project period.
9.1.4 Drinking water
People of the village are dependent on existing dug wells for their drinking water. The existing drinking water sources
are insufficient to cater the need of drinking water. As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the
quantity of drinking water would improve.
9.1.5 Crops
Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in Derajuri village. The surface water is scanty
due to low rainfall and ground water is not feasible to explore for crop production.
All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned check
dams and farm ponds would help percolate water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. This will help in
additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season of
crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken.
111
9.1.6 Vegetative cover
There is negligible area under tree cover. the village has a forest area of 200 ha. there, not concentrated in any area. It is
planned that 15 ha land to be covered under new plantation.
9.1.7 Livestock
The village has quite good of livestock population. These include pigs, cows, , goats. The interventions like provision
of good quality pigs, goats, cows and the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up
the dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in
livestock population and yield from them.
Table No. 9.2: Summarize in the table given below (Quantifiable indicators)
1 2 3 4 5 6 S. No. Item
Unit of measurement
Pre-project Status
Expected Post-project Status Remarks
1 Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level)
Meters 13 11 At some point recharge may be observed more but the overall raise of Groundwater table is expected to be about 2 meters.
2 Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated No. 5 25 3 Quality of drinking water Description Turbid Water Clear, Potable 4 Availability of drinking water Description Scarce Sufficient Many ring well and tube
well etc. would be provided.
112
5 Increase in irrigation potential Hec. Nil 3600 Supplementary irrigation through improved soil moisture regime. Water distribution channel from water harvesting structures, pumps etc.
6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Description Single cropping Double Cropping also multiple cropping in suitable areas
7 Area under agricultural crop Hec. 4058 4163 I Area under single crop Hec. Ii Area under double crop Hec. iii Area under multiple crop Hec.
8 Net increase in crop production area Hec. 3869 6300 9 Increase in area under Vegetation/Forest Hec. Nil 78
10 Increase in area under horticulture Hec. Negligible 20 11 Increase in area under fuel Hec. Nil 40 12 Increase in area under Fodder Hec. Nil 25 13 Increase in milk production Litres/day 14 Environmental Impact Environment is in
peril due to lack of vegetation
Improve in Environmental Impact will be noticed
Area under permanent vegetation will be increased
Change in Soil Loss 112 Ton / Ha / Yr Soil loss will be reduced
Soil loss will have to be monitored
Perenniality of flow and change in Run-off Surface runoff will be reduced due to increase in time of concentration & rate of infiltration.
Recharge of ground water 13 11 Ground Water table in open wells area recorded in table 3.14 will have to be maintained and monitored.
14 No. of SHGs Promoted No. 15 Increase in no. of livelihoods No.
113
16 Increase in income Rs. 10000 / Family Av - Rs 30000 / Yr / Family
Socio economic condition will be improved
17 Status of Migration No. 347 Nil Migration is expected to be stopped
18 SHG Federations formed No. Federation of homogenous SHGs will be organized
19 Credit linkage with banks Rs. All UGs and SHGs would have credit linkage
All SHGs will be linked with credit linkage in Banks
20 Resource use agreements Nil Framework under process
Resource use agreements will be applicable for all stake holders
21 WDF collection & management Rs. Nil As detailed in Watershed Development works schedule
22 Summary of lessons learnt Systemic efforts are to be made by the PIA/WDT/WC to learn from the field experiences and also from feed back of independent sources. The following measures are suggested for the PIA/WDT/WC to enable the learning process at different levels. 1. Systematic analysis of monitoring data on a regular basis and sharing with DWDU/SLNA as well as with DoLR throough SLNA. 2. Engaging services of independent academic and voluntary organizations by DWDU/SLNA for taking up research and action research projects. 3. Initiating pilots and innovative models 4. Organize workshops at District / State level sharing success stories of other projects.
Table No.9.3: Backward and Forward Linkages
5 6 7 Type of Marketing Facility Name of the institution Pre-project (no.) Expected post project status
(A) Backward linkages (i) Seed certification Assam Seed Corporation /
Seed Corporation of India Farmers are not procuring certified seeds
Only certified seeds will be procured
(ii) Seed supply system Assam Seed Corporation / Seed Corporation of India
Individual purchase from open market
Seed supply will be only through Organized sector, Department of Agriculture
(iii) Fertilizer supply system Fertilizer Corporation of India From Open Market Department of Agriculture, Assam will ensure genuine supply of Fertilizer.
114
(iv) Pesticide supply system From reputed manufacturers through the Department of Agriculture
From Open Market Department of Agriculture, Assam will ensure genuine supply of Fertilizer.
(v) Credit institutions Langpi Dehangi Rural Bank / UBI / SBI
Almost not being practiced Credit linkage with the banks will be ensured
(vi) Water supply State Department of Public Health Engineering
Private arrangement Ring Wells, Tube Wells are being provided from EPA & WD works. State PHE Deptt will be involved through convergence
(vii) Extension services State Department of Agriculture & Allied services
To some extent services are being provided
Extensive services from Agriculture, Soil Conservation, Fishery, Horticulture, Animal Husbandary and Veterinary will have to be ensured
(viii) Nurseries Provision for creation of Forestry and Horticulture Nursery is made in the DPR
No nursery is there in the project area
Additional supply of seedlings will be made available from State Agriculture and Forest Departments
(ix) Tools/machinery suppliers
Department of Agriculture, Assam
Farmers are procuring by themselves
Provision is made in DPR. To be procured through State Deaprtment of Agriculture
(x) Price Support system State Department of Agriculture
No price support system is functioning in letter and spirit
State Government will have to take appropriate steps
(xi) Labour State Department of Labour and Employment
Not in practice Prevailing rules will be followed
(xii) Any other (please specify)
(B) Forward linkages (i) Harvesting/threshing
machinery State Department of Agriculture
No Action User Federation will take collection action with the State Department of Agriculture
(ii) Storage (including cold storage)
State Department of Agriculture
No cold storage in Project Area
State Department of Agriculture will take appropriate steps
(iii) Road network State PWD Department Needs improvement Road network will have to be improved through PMGRY
(iv) Transport facilities State Deaprtment of Transport
Poor communication Needs to be improved
(v) Markets / Mandis VCDC (Panchayats), Local Bodies
Only 3 markets at present Marketing facilities will have to be increased. State Department of Agriculture will have to take appropriate action.
115
(vi) Agro and other Industries Agro Industries Development Corporation, Assam, State Industries Development Corporation, State Department of Industries and Commerce
Not significant PIA / WDT / WC will coordinate with Diary Development authorities.
(vii) Milk and other collection centres
Dairy Development Department
No production in the Project Area
PIA / WDT / WC will coordinate with Diary Development authorities.
(viii) Labour Department of Labour and Employment
Not significant PIA / WDT / WC will coordinate with Diary Development authorities.
(ix) Any other (please specify)
116
List of Maps to be enclosed along with DPR.
1 .Location –District, mandal, village, watershed location map
2 watershed Map for IWMP Project (Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral & Topo Sheet)
3 Social Map (along with photos & paper drawing)-with Existing Structure
4 Resource Map (along with photos & paper drawing)and Land Type
5 Drainage Map (with numbering)
6 Map showing existing structures
a. Proposed action plan map
b. Land use/Land cover map
c. Slope map
d. Soil and land capability class maps
e. GIS maps
B,c,d will be from the PRA maps done in the village
should include Latitude and Longitude and the plot no.
will be provided by JSACS
Top Related