Using Municipal Solid Waste as a Biofuel Feedstock

60
Internal Research Program Data-driven analysis to guide sustainable solid waste management Using Municipal Solid Waste as a Biofuel Feedstock August 2015

Transcript of Using Municipal Solid Waste as a Biofuel Feedstock

  • Internal Research Program

    Data-driven analysis to guide sustainable solid waste management

    Using Municipal Solid Waste as a Biofuel Feedstock

    August 2015

  • About EREF

    The mission of the Environmental Research & Education Foundation (EREF) is to fund and

    direct scientific research and educational initiatives for waste management practices to benefit

    industry participants and the communities they serve.

    EREF Internal Research Program

    EREFs Internal Research Program (IRP) was developed as part of the foundations effort to

    expand its mission to advance knowledge and education for sustainable solid waste

    management. The primary objective of the IRP is to aggregate and analyze solid waste data.

    The program also provides valuable experience to undergraduate and graduate students who

    assist in data gathering and analysis. Fees charged for this report are used to provide

    internships to college students who assist in data gathering and analysis efforts for the Internal

    Research Program.

    [email protected]

    Web: www.erefdn.org

    mailto:[email protected]://www.erefdn.org/

  • CONTENTS

  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  • While promising, there are many considerations and challenges in implementing what is still a

    relatively new technology in terms of its application to MSW. As development of the technology

    continues, energy requirements must be a consideration. As determined by the LCA, power

    consumption can be two orders of magnitude higher than comparable existing technologies used to

    make electricity from MSW. This is further increased by the use of MSW as a feedstock, which

    requires substantial pre-processing to obtain consistent particle sizing, ensure a low moisture

    content, and remove components that cannot be converted to biofuel or that may detrimentally

    affect biofuel production. While this study does not address cost-benefit factors, an economic

    analysis of biofuel production from MSW would be a critical next step to demonstrate feasibility of

    converting MSW to pipeline-ready fuel at-scale.

    SUMMARY

  • BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

  • OVERVIEW OF WASTE CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES

  • Figure 1. Schematic of a Typical Waste-to-Energy

    (Incineration with Energy Recovery) Process

  • Figure 2. Example of Syngas Composition Using

    (a) Air and (b) Steam as Gasifying Agents

  • Figure 3. Schematic of Pyrolysis and Gasification Processes

  • Figure 4. Representative Industrial Feedstocks and Products That Can Be Produced From Syngas

  • LIFECYCLE ASSESSMENT OF WASTE CONVERSION

  • Figure 5. Cases and MSW Process Scenarios Examined in This Study

  • Table 1. Net Global Warming Potential by Scenario1

  • Table 2. Electricity Consumption and Production per Ton of MSW

    Table 3. Products From the Gasification / Fischer-Tropsch (GFT) Process1

  • Table 4. Key Results Summary for GWP and Energy Production

  • MSW MANAGEMENT IN NORTH CAROLINA AS

    A CASE STUDY FOR WASTE CONVERSION

  • Table 5. List of Wastesheds in N.C. and Representative Population

  • Table 6. Estimated Number of Solid Waste

    Management Facilities in N.C.1

  • Table 7. Statewide Annual MSW Generation

    by Type of Facility1

    Table 8. Estimated Annual Waste Generation (tons)

    by Wasteshed and Type of Facility

  • Table 9. Estimated MSW Composition in N.C.

    by Waste Component (%)

  • Figure 6. Composition of Recyclable Materials

    Based on Type of Recycling Facility

  • Table 10. Percentage of Generated Waste

    in N.C. That Can Be Converted to

    Biofuels by Facility Type1

  • SITING AND SOURCE FEEDSTOCK OBSERVATIONS

  • Table 11. Estimated Number of Potential MSW to

    Biofuels Conversion Facilities by Wasteshed1

  • Table 12. Commodity Pricing, Tonnage and

    Estimated Value from Recyclables

  • Table 13. Estimated Biofuel Production

    from MSW (in millions of gallons)1

  • CONCLUSIONS

  • ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

    http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/8681

  • REFERENCES

  • Appendix A: Methodology & LCA Modeling Approach

    APPENDICES

  • Figure A1. Cases and MSW Process Scenarios Examined in this Study.

    In Case 1, all MSW is Collected in One Curbside Bin While in

    Case 2 Recyclables and Residual Waste are Handled Separately.

  • Table A1. Separation Efficiency for

    Material Recovery Facility (%)1

  • Figure A3. RDF Process Flow Diagram.

    During the production of RDF, materials undesirable for

    gasification are removed via mechanical sorting.

    Figure A2. Conceptual Diagram of RDF Processing.

    RDF is created by mechanically removing wet organics, metals,

    and chlorinated plastics, before shredding and pelletizing the

    remaining material, composed primarily of paper and plastic.

  • Table A2. Separation Efficiency for Two Pieces of

    Equipment within the RDF Facility (%)1

    Waste Categories Waste Component Trommel Air Separator

    Yard Waste Leaves 70

    Grass 70 90

    Food Waste Vegetable 70 90

    Non-Vegetable 70 90

    Recyclable Metals Ferrous Cans 90

    Aluminum Cans 90

    Glass

    Brown 100

    Green 100

    Clear 100

    Other

    Rubber/Leather 90

    Wood 90

    Misc, Inorganic 100

  • Table A3. Equipment Electricity Usage per Mg of Throughput

    Table A4. Inter-facility Transport Distance in km

  • Table A5. Material Properties Used in the LCA Model

  • Table A6. Separation Efficiency

    for Materials from WTE Ash1

  • Table A7. Required Gasifier Input Parameters

  • Table A8. Key Assumptions Used in the ASPEN Plus

    Simulations of the Gasifier

  • Table A9. Difference Between Spreadsheet Model and ASPEN Plus Yield

    Estimates with 0% CH4

  • Table A10. Difference Between Spreadsheet Model and ASPEN Plus

    Yield Estimates with 3% CH4

  • Table A11. Carbon Chain Length Ranges

    for Unrefined FT Products1

    (Equation A1)

  • Appendix B1: Landfills and WTE Plants

  • Appendix B1 (continued): Landfills and WTE Plants

  • Appendix B2: Composting Operations

  • Appendix B3: Recycling MRFs1

    1Tonnage data was obtained for MRFs via surveys and is partially complete. As a

    result, tonnage data on a per facility basis is not provided.

    Facility Name County

    American Recycling of WNC Buncombe

    Butler Paper Recycling (VA) Out-of-state

    Curbside Management Buncombe

    Davidson County MRF Davidson

    ECVC - Eastern Carolina Vocational Center Pitt

    Foothills Sanitation & Recycling Wilkes

    GDS Conover MRF Catawba

    High Point MRF Guilford

    Iredell Recycling, LLC Iredell

    Kemp Recyclers Wayne

    North Davidson Garbage Service, Inc Davidson

    Person Industries Person

    Pratt Industries (Fayetteville Recycling) Cumberland

    Recommunity Recycling Charlotte Mecklenburg

    Recommunity Recycling Greensboro Guilford

    RockTenn (TN) Out-of-state

    Sonoco Recycling (Charlotte) Mecklenburg

    Sonoco Recycling (Raleigh) Wake

    Sonoco Recycling (Onslow) Onslow

    Sonoco Recycling (SC) Out-of-state

    TFC Recycling - Chesapeake (VA) Out-of-state

    The Recycling Group, LLC Burke

    Uwharrie Environmental, Inc Montgomery

    Wagram Paper Stock Scotland

    WM Recycle America - Raleigh Wake

    WM Recycle America - Winston Salem Forsyth

  • Appendix B4: Recycling Non-MRFs1

    Facility Name County

    Asheboro Recycling Center Randolph

    Asheville Waste Paper Co., Inc. Buncombe

    Best Disposal, Inc. Davidson

    Cape Fear Recyclers, Inc. New Hanover

    Caraustar (Carolina Recycling) Mecklenburg

    Carolina Fibre Corporation Guilford

    Carolina Shredding Authority Alamance

    Confidential Shredding Guilford

    Danny's Dumpster Buncombe

    EarthWay Global, LLC Caldwell

    Engineered Plastics Inc Lee

    Federal Waste Recycling Alamance

    Fortress Metals Durham

    Futura Ventures Inc Pasquotank

    GDS, Inc. - Forest City Rutherford

    GDS, Inc. - New Bern Craven

    Go Green - Edwin Russ Recycling Columbus

    Green Coast Recycling, LLC New Hanover

    Green Pieces Recycling Stanly

    Haywood County MRF Haywood

    Integrated Container Corporation Lenoir

    International Paper Mecklenburg

    Iron Mountain Confidential Destruction Mecklenburg

    Iron Mountain Confidential Destruction Wake

    L&S Enterprises Guilford

    Leisure Time Recycling Davidson

    Martin Enterprises Martin

    Maslo Company Mecklenburg

    Matangira Curbside Recycling Rowan

    Material Matters Inc. Randolph

    Morrison's Recycling Surry

    Nelson & Nelson Recycling Robeson

    News and Observer Recycling Wake

    OCS Waste Lenoir

    Omni Resource Recovery, Inc. Forsyth

    Orange Recycling Services, Inc. Durham

    Philco Services Durham

    Piedmont Disposal and Recycling Forsyth

    Piedmont Paper Stock Guilford

    Plyler Paper Stock Company, Inc. Mecklenburg

  • Pratt Industries Wake

    PRO Pallet South, Inc. Montgomery

    Recycling Management Resources, LLC Wake

    Republic Services Forsyth

    Republic Services Raleigh Recyclery Wake

    Rutherford Sales and Recovery Company Rutherford

    S.T.A.T. Industrial Recycling LLC Caldwell

    Salvage America, Inc Guilford

    Appendix B4 (continued): Recycling Non-MRFs1

  • Appendix C: North Carolina MSW Management Facilities (Map)