The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYdocuments1.worldbank.org/curated/en/868171468032398453/...1...
Transcript of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYdocuments1.worldbank.org/curated/en/868171468032398453/...1...
1
Document of
The World Bank
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Report No: 62002-GN
EMERGENCY PROJECT PAPER
ON A
PROPOSED GRANT
IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 21 MILLION
(US$34 MILLION EQUIVALENT)
TO THE
REPUBLIC OF GUINEA
AS PART OF SDR 56.8 MILLION (US$ 92 MILLION EQUIVALENT)
FOR THE SECOND SERIES OF PROJECTS UNDER THE FIRST PHASE OF THE WEST
AFRICA REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (WARCIP
APL1B)
May 25, 2011
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the
performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World
Bank authorization.
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
2
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(Exchange Rate Effective April 29, 2011)
Currency Unit =
0.616921 DTS = US$1
US$ = SDR 1
FISCAL YEAR
January 1 – December 31
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
$
ACE
ADSL
AGETIC
United States dollar, all dollars are US dollars unless
otherwise indicated
Africa Coast to Europe
Assymetric Digital Subscriber Line
Agence Guinéenne des technologies de l'information et de
la communication
APL
ARPT
Adaptable Program Loan
Authority of Regulation of Post and Telecoms
BP Bank Procedures
C&MA Construction and Maintenance Agreement
EASSy
ECOWAS
EEZ
Eastern Africa Submarine Cable System
Economic Community of West African States
Exclusive Economic Zone
EIA
ESIA
Environmental Impact Assessment
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
ESMF
ESMP
ESSAF
Environmental and Social Management Framework
Environmental and Social Management Plan
Environmental and Social Screening Assessment
Framework
FM
Gbit/s
GDP
GoG
GPRS
GPT
GSM
Financial Management
Gigabit per Second
Gross Domestic Product
Government of Guinea
General Packet Radio Service
General Purpose Technology
Global System for Mobile Communication
GUILAB
ICPC
ICT
Broadband Company for Guinea- La Guinéenne pour la
Large Bande
International Cable Protection Committee
Information and Communication Technology
3
IDA International Development Association
IsDB
IFC
Islamic Development Bank
International Finance Corporation
IFR
IRR
IRU
ISP
Interim Financial Report
Internal Rate of Return
Indefeasible Rights of Use
Internet Service Provider
ITES
ITU
Information Technology Enabled Services
International Telecommunication Union
IXP
Kbit
LDC
MAN
M&E
Mb
MIGA
Mbit/s
MoF
MPTNTI
NPV
Internet Exchange Point
Kilobit
Least Developed Country
Metropolitan Area Network
Monitoring and Evaluation
Megabyte
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency
Megabit per second
Ministry of Finance
Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications and New
Information Technologies
Net Present Value
OP Operational Procedures
ORAF
PAD
PDO
PIU
Operational Risk Assessment Framework
Project Appraisal Document
Project Development Objective
Project Implementation Unit
PPA Project Preparation Advance
PPP
RAP
Public Private Partnership
Resettlement Action Plan
RIAS
RPF
Regional Integration Assistance Strategy
Resettlement Policy Framework
R-PRSP
3/WASC
SDR
SOTELGUI
Regional Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
South Atlantic 3/West Africa Submarine Cable
Special Drawing Rights
Telecommunications Company of Guinea- Société de
Télécommunication de la Guinée
SPV
TA
WARCIP
Special Purpose Vehicle
Technical Assistance
West Africa Regional Communications Infrastructure
Program
WBG
World Bank Group
4
Vice President:
Director of Regional Integration:
Obiageli K. Ezekwesili
Yusupha B. Crookes
Country Director: Ousmane Diagana
Sector Director: Jose Luis Irigoyen
Sector Manager:
Task Team Leaders for WARCIP APL 1B
Philippe Dongier
Boutheina Guermazi and Mavis Ampah
Task Team Leader for WARCIP- Guinea: Boutheina Guermazi
5
Table of Contents
A. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 10
B. Emergency Challenge: Country Context, Recovery Strategy and Rationale for
Proposed Bank Emergency Project. .......................................................................................... 10
C. Bank Response: The Project .............................................................................................. 14
D. Appraisal of Project Activities ........................................................................................... 18
E. Institutional Arrangements and Financing Plan ............................................................. 22
F. Key Risks and Mitigating Measures ................................................................................. 25
G. Terms and Conditions for Project Financing ................................................................... 26
Annex 1: Detailed Description of Project Components ........................................................... 28
Annex 2: Results Framework and Monitoring ........................................................................ 34
Annex 3: Summary of Estimated Project Costs ....................................................................... 36
Annex 4 Operational Risk Assessment Framework (ORAF) ................................................. 37
Annex 5: Financial Management and Disbursement Arrangements ..................................... 41
Annex 6: Procurement Arrangements ...................................................................................... 45
Annex 7: Implementation and Monitoring Arrangements ..................................................... 54
Annex 8: Project Preparation and Appraisal Team Members ............................................... 57
Annex 9: Environmental and Social Safeguards Framework ................................................ 60
Annex 10: Economic and Financial Analysis ........................................................................... 67
Annex 11: Documents in Project Files ...................................................................................... 71
Annex 12: Statement of Loans and Credits .............................................................................. 72
Annex 13: Country at a Glance ................................................................................................. 74
Annex 14: Maps........................................................................................................................... 75
6
WARCIP-Guinea
PROJECT PAPER
Africa
Basic Information
Director of Regional Integration: Yusupha B.
Crookes
Country Director: Ousmane Diagana
Sector Director: Jose Luis Irigoyen
Sector Manager: Philippe Dongier
Team Leaders for WARCIP APL 1B:
Boutheina Guermazi and Mavis Ampah
Team Leader for WARCIP Guinea: Boutheina
Guermazi
Project ID: P122402
Expected Effectiveness Date: September 30,
2011
Lending Instrument: Emergency Recovery
Grant
Sectors: Telecommunications (50%); General
Information and Communications sector
(50%)
Themes: Regional integration (40%);
Infrastructure services for private sector
development (40%); Regulation and
competition policy (20%)
Environmental category: B
Expected Closing Date: March 31, 2016
Joint IFC:
Joint Level:
Project Financing Data
[ ] Loan [ ] Credit [ X ] Grant [ ] Guarantee [ ] Other:
Proposed terms:
Financing Plan (US$m)
Source Total Amount (US $m)
Total Project Cost:
Cofinancing:
Borrower:
Total Bank Financing:
IBRD
IDA:
New
Recommitted
34.00
34.00
Client Information
Recipient: Republic of Guinea (represented by the Ministry of Economy and Finances)
Responsible Agency: Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications and New Information
Technologies
Contact Person: Mr.Oye Guilavogui
Telephone No.: 224-60-23-75-00
Email: [email protected]
7
Estimated disbursements (Bank FY/US$m)
FY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Annual 17.3 4.8 8.5 3.4 0
Cumulative 17.3 22.1 30.6 34.00 34.00
Project Development Objective and Description
Project development objective:
The project development objective of WARCIP-Guinea is to increase the geographical reach of
broadband networks and reduce costs of communications services in the territory of Guinea
Project description:
The project will have 3 components:
(i) Infrastructure component to improve connectivity: international connectivity
through access to ACE submarine cable (main focus – US$24.2 million) and
Regional connectivity (secondary focus – US$ 1 million).
(ii) Technical Assistance component to create enabling environment (US$6.8
million) and
(iii) Implementation support including contingency (US$ 2 million).
Safeguard and Exception to Policies
Safeguard policies triggered:
Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01)
Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04)
Forests (OP/BP 4.36)
Pest Management (OP 4.09)
Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11)
Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10)
Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12)
Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37)
Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50)
Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60)
[ X ]Yes [ ] No
[ X ]Yes [ ] No
[ ]Yes [ X ] No
[ ]Yes [X ] No
[ X ]Yes [ X ] No
[ ]Yes [ X ] No
[ X]Yes [ ] No
[ ]Yes [ X ] No
[ ]Yes [ X ] No
[ ]Yes [ X ] No
Does the project require any exceptions from Bank policies?
Have these been approved by Bank management?
[ ]Yes [X ] No
[ ]Yes [ ] No
Conditions and Legal Covenants:
Financing
Agreement
Reference
Description of Condition/Covenant Date Due
8
Art 5.01 (a) GUILAB has been fully established and
operational, in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association, in the territory of the Recipient, including
through the appointment of its Director General and the
adoption of its shareholders‟ agreement and its by-
laws.
(b) With Sotelgui‟s acquiescence, the ACE
Consortium has transferred to GUILAB all the rights
and obligations of Sotelgui in the Construction and
Maintenance Agreement and has fully substituted
Sotelgui with GUILAB as the member of the ACE
Consortium.
(c) The Contractual Arrangement, in form and
substance satisfactory to the Association, has been
entered into between the Recipient and GUILAB.
(d) The Recipient shall have established the PIU
under terms of reference and with staff in number and
with qualifications satisfactory to the Association. As
part of such staffing, there shall be in place for the PIU:
(i) the Project coordinator; and (ii) a financial
management specialist and a procurement specialist, all
of them under terms of reference and with
qualifications and experience satisfactory to the
Association.
(e) The Recipient shall have adopted the Project
Implementation Manual in form and substance
satisfactory to the Association.
By effectiveness
Schedule 2
Section 4 (b)
Set up a financial and accounting computerized system
for the Project
By disbursement
of components 1 b,
2 and 3
9
Schedule 2
Section 2 C (4)
Schedule 2
Section 1(D)
Schedule 2
Section 1 (D)
Recruit an external auditor for the PIU on the basis of
terms of reference and with qualifications and
experience satisfactory to the Association.
Guinea shall:
(a) Prepare, consult upon and disclose the ESIA,
ESMP, and/or the RAP, as the case may be, as
approved by the Association;
(b) Ensure that the construction of the landing station
related to component 1.a of the Project does not
commence until and unless: (i) the Association shall
have approved the ESIA, ESMP, and/or the RAP, as
the case may be, and the same documents have been
consulted upon and disclosed as approved by the
Association; and (ii) shall have verified, through its
own staff, outside experts, or existing
environmental/social institutions, that the activities
under component 1.a of the Project meet the
environmental and social requirements of appropriate
national and local authorities and that they are
consistent with the Association‟s applicable
environmental and social assessment and safeguard
policies and comply with the environmental and social
review procedures set forth in the Project
Implementation Manual;
(c) take all measures required on its behalf to carry out,
or to ensure that GUILAB carry out, the ESIA, ESMP,
and/or the RAP, as the case may be, in accordance with
the provisions of the ESSAF; and
(d) ensure that the relevant mitigation and monitoring
provisions of the ESIA, ESMP, and/or RAP, as the
case may be, are appropriately implemented.
4 months after the
Effective Date
Not later than one
hundred twenty
(120) days after
the Effective Date
10
A. Introduction
1. This Project Paper seeks the approval of the Executive Directors to provide a grant
in an amount of SDR 21 million (US$34 million equivalent) to the Republic of Guinea for
its participation in the West Africa Regional Communications Infrastructure Program
(WARCIP- Guinea).
2. Guinea's telecommunications policy was updated in 2004 to create a more
competitive environment. Reforms resulted in an impressive growth in mobile cellular
penetration from 2 % in 2005 to about 35% in 2011, with a coverage area of about 73% of the
population. Despite significant growth in mobile penetration, the sector faces numerous
challenges. Access to Internet services remains very limited and very expensive. Guinea is one of
a handful of countries in the ECOWAS region which is not connected to global broadband fiber
optics infrastructure and relies on expensive satellite for international connectivity. Broadband
services are still very limited and expensive, with cost of bandwidth between US$4,000-5,000
for 1 Mbit (compared with about, US$200 in the US, and approximately US$500 in East Africa)
resulting in high connectivity cost. The proposed project seeks to contribute to lowering the cost
and improving quality of connectivity in Guinea. In order to reach this objective, the project
proposes an integrated approach focusing on (i) the connection of Guinea to global broadband
fiber optics infrastructure through covering the cost of Guinea‟s membership in the Africa Coast
to Europe (ACE) submarine cable, (ii) creating an enabling environment, dealing with
transactional issues related to the ACE cable and institutional strengthening to remove existing
bottlenecks for private sector participation in both national and regional infrastructure
development.
3. The key outcomes of the Project would include: (a) Increase in Volume of
international traffic (11 Kbit/s per person), (b) Improved Access to telephone services (47.5%),
(c) Improved Access to internet services (0.7%) and (d) Reduction in Average monthly price of
wholesale international E1 capacity link from capital city to Europe (US$ 2,000).
4. Partnership arrangements: This project is developed in partnership with the Islamic
Development Bank (IsDB) and other donors interested1 to develop the national backbone in
Guinea. The specific modalities of cooperation and amounts are still under discussion. Financing
by the IsDB is specific to the national connectivity aspect only. International connectivity is fully
covered by this grant and does not depend on the IsDB for financing or other donors, although
the two activities complement each other. Achieving this grant‟s project development objectives,
however, does not depend on the other Donors‟ financing.
B. Emergency Challenge: Country Context, Recovery Strategy and Rationale for
Proposed association-financed Emergency Project.
1 Those include the European Development Bank as well as the Chinese Government.
11
COUNTRY CONTEXT
5. Following a military coup in 2008, Guinea returned to civilian rule through the
election and inauguration of President Alpha Condé in December 2010. Guinea gained
independence from France in 1958. From this period until the early 1990s Guinea was governed
by one-party and military governments. Following a military coup in 2008, Guinea returned to
civilian rule through the election and inauguration of President Alpha Condé in December 2010.
Guinea is endowed with vast natural and geological resources, including over half of the world‟s
bauxite reserves, as well as iron ore, gold, diamonds, uranium and hydropower. Poor
governance, corruption and political instability have led to a low economic growth rate. Between
2005 and 2008 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth averaged 3%, and in 2009 a negative
growth rate of -0.3% was recorded. Guinea remains one of the poorest countries in the world
because growth, which comes mainly from extractive industries and agriculture (industry
represented 53% of GDP in 2010), has not been equitable. In 2010, the country ranked 156 out of
169 countries in 2010 in the United Nations Human Development Index.
6. Since 2008, economic growth strongly decelerated, to become negative in per capita
terms. Cumulatively, GDP per capita declined by 4.6 % between 2008 and 2010. While
agriculture continued to grow modestly, the mining sector - historically a major driver of growth
contracted in real terms by 6 % between 2008 and 2010 in spite of rising world commodity
prices. The regulatory business environment worsened with political uncertainty and deteriorated
security situation.
7. New developments in the political landscape following the success of the elections in
2010 are bringing a new hope for the country. The goal of the new Government is to
dramatically improve governance in order to bring the country within a few years onto a rapid
development path. The first phase of this program focuses on addressing institutional and
sectoral dysfunctions to prepare the stage for a subsequent phase of reform and fast growth, and
it is articulated around efforts to improve governance, stabilize the economy, and initiate a
recovery plan to deliver early wins in terms of better services and more jobs.
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE ICT SECTOR
8. Guinea embraced full liberalization since 2004. Guinea's telecommunications policy
was updated in 2004 to create a more competitive environment and the Government has pledged
to put an appropriate legal framework and relevant regulations in place and to reform
SOTELGUI-Guinea‟s incumbent national telecommunications company. These actions are
needed to enable continued liberalisation of the sector, to ensure non-discriminatory access to
services by all operators and to promote universal access.
9. Results of reforms translated in high growth of mobile penetration. With six
competing mobile networks, Guinea's mobile voice sector has shown rapid growth rates for three
consecutive years, boosted by the entry of two well-resourced international operators, MTN and
Orange, which have invested in new infrastructure. As a result, in January 2011, mobile
penetration stands at about 35%, with a coverage area of about 73% of the population. However,
as in most other African countries, mobile penetration is much higher in the capital city. This is
not only related to the lower rural income levels but also due to the lack of a national
12
transmission backbone which would reduce the cost of calls, and the absence of a full fledged
universal access strategy.
10. Fixed line penetration remains very limited despite early privatization of
SOTELGUI. There are very few fixed lines in the country (only 1.1 per hundred inhabitants).
The fixed line sector has evolved under a joint venture with Telekom Malaysia in which it
initially retained 60% of shares in SOTELGUI. Since 2005, Telekom Malaysia withdrew from
SOTELGUI. A second attempt to re-privatize SOTELGUI was launched again in 2009 but was
put on hold due to the deterioration of the political situation. Despite the uncertainties,
SOTELGUI has been very active multiplying its investments in its mobile operation and looking
to introduce Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) and Code Division Multiple Access
(CDMA) technologies to modernize its network and respond to the pressures of competition.
SOTELGUI has a fiber optic Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) in Conakry where it leases
dark fiber to other customers such as the mobile operators.
11. Internet is still a luxury in Guinea. There are relatively few Internet subscribers in
Guinea (about 33,000 were estimated in 2010), which reflects a penetration rate that is amongst
the lowest in the region. However Internet usage reached almost 33% through shared access
(especially cybercafés and in the workplace). Although computers are still expensive compared
to income levels, as are monthly Internet subscriptions, the network and quality of cybercafés
allow Guineans to obtain Internet access at prices that are in line with the sub-region. ADSL and
dialup were the technologies used by most Internet subscribers, until the introduction of General
Packet Radio Service (GPRS) and Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE) services by
the private mobile operators in 2008/2009, allowing them to gain more than 60% of the market.
Some large companies use their own Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) links.
12. The sector suffers from the lack of adequate international connectivity. Guinea is
one of a handful of countries in the ECOWAS region which is not connected to global broadband
fiber optics infrastructure and relies on expensive satellite for international connectivity.
Broadband services are still very limited and expensive, with cost of bandwidth between
US$4,000-5,000 for 1 Mbit (compared with about, US$200 in the US, and approximately
US$500 in East Africa) resulting in high connectivity costs in general and high prices for
international calls.
13. The sector suffers from a high level of fraud for international communications and
an inadequate response to combat the grey market. In an attempt to respond to fraud in
international communications, the regulatory authority introduced a new system of control using
specific equipment installed and operated, by an intermediary operator, on the national operator‟s
premises so as to monitor international traffic. A new tax on international incoming traffic was
also introduced by Joint Decree A/2009/1135/MCNTI/MEF/SGG of May 29, 2009. Results of
these measures have been detrimental for the sector as it has increased further by-pass or grey
market termination of international traffic. Those measures created an economic space, allowing
for arbitrage between official high price and lower actual costs. In addition, it created further
strain on the operators as they have seen a significant decrease in the volume of incoming traffic
and foreign currency receipts (a decrease of 15% in traffic is reported). Longer term effects
impact operator‟s profitability and by consequence the level of taxation from the sector.
13
14. Several regulatory constraints prevent the sector from playing its role in the
economic and social development of Guinea. The new regulatory authority, Authority of
Regulation of Post and Telecoms (ARPT), was created in 2008 to regulate the communications
sector and ensure fair competition. The Authority is still in its early development phase with
significant needs for capacity strengthening to play its role of ensuring fair competition in the
market. ARPT is still not fully operational, functioning without an established Board. ARPT
needs to build capacity in a number of areas including regulating broadband services,
interconnection and spectrum reforms. Overall private sector confidence in the governance of
the sector is quite limited given a complex and volatile environment and concerns about
unilateral decisions affecting license terms and conditions. ARPT needs to restore investor
confidence in the regulatory function through more consultation with the operators before new
rules are adopted.
15. Guinea is making credible attempts at improving the policy and regulatory
environment. The Government of Guinea (GoG) is committed to deepening sector reforms. A
new communications law reflecting ECOWAS guidelines has been developed and awaiting final
approvals. Policy direction of the sector embraces full competition in all segments of the market.
The GoG is also committed to increase investor confidence in the sector.
RATIONALE FOR THIS EMERGENCY PROJECT
16. Without urgent support from the World Bank, Guinea will likely lose the
opportunity to be connected to international communications infrastructure made
available through the ACE submarine cable. In all likelihood, beyond a domestic connection
to the ACE cable, there are no other opportunities for Guinea to connect to another submarine
cable for many years to come. SOTELGUI, a 100% Government owned fixed line operator
signed the ACE Construction and Maintenance Agreement (C&MA) on June 5, 2010 but was not
in a position to meet its payment obligations to ACE. To date, payment by SOTELGUI to ACE
is around US$ 4.3 million. The other parties to the C&MA have by April 2011 paid about US$
11.5 million each, as required under the C&MA. ACE has given SOTELGUI a limited
opportunity to keep its membership status in ACE. SOTELGUI managed to secure third party
financing of US$3. 5 million by March 17, 2011 to secure a branching Unit. The Management
Committee of ACE gave SOTELGUI an additional grace period until May 30, 2011 to pay an
additional US$3.5 million. Guinea has a very tight schedule to catch up with the rest of ACE
Consortium members in terms of the payment schedule. A new payment schedule has been
discussed with ACE to take into account the effectiveness of the project.
17. Earlier World Bank support could not be extended to Guinea due to the arrears
situation. Given the recent macroeconomic situation in the country, the GoG has not been in a
position to provide financial support to SOTELGUI to make the payments for connection to the
ACE cable. Earlier requests for World Bank support could not be acted upon because of
suspension of relationship with the de facto Government, and subsequently due to the suspension
related to payment arrears with the Bank. This project will allow Guinea to make the required
payments to ACE and normalize its position vis-a-vis the cable consortium. If Guinea were to
miss the opportunity of the international connectivity through ACE, Guinea‟s information and
communications technology (ICT) sector would remain under-developed and the price of
14
communications would remain high, thereby limiting opportunities for growth, job creation and
development, and Guinea‟s ability to trade competitively with the rest of the world.
18. Project is eligible for Processing under OP/BP 8.00: The emergency situation was
reported to management on March 9, 2011, in line with the provisions OP/BP 8.00. In line with
the provisions of paragraph 2 of OP 8.00, the proposed assistance from the Association will
consist of an emergency grant that will allow the Association to provide a rapid response to
Guinea‟s request for urgent assistance to maintain its participation in the ACE cable.
19. Significant gains are expected from the connectivity to ACE. The ACE submarine
cable system has the potential to substantially address the urgent need for high capacity access to
the international backbone at substantially lower cost than currently available in Guinea via
satellite. Participation of Guinea in the ACE cable is expected to reduce broadband prices by as
much as 75% by 2015. Preliminary assessment indicates that significant savings are expected to
be accrued. Estimated conservative annual savings would be over US$5 million. The operation
is also expected to result in increased penetration of mobile telephony from 35 % today to 50%
by 2017, and will likely lead to the take off of Internet penetration from nearly 0% to at least 3%
by 2017. Wider benefits are likely to be significant as better and cheaper access to broadband
lead to improved competitiveness of small and medium size enterprises, facilitate access to new
trade opportunities, help to diversify economies and create jobs.
C. Bank Response: The Project
20. Guinea is included in the WARCIP Program: In order to respond to the GoG request
to improve international connectivity and support immediate reforms in the sector, Guinea is
included in the second round of countries under the first phase of the West Africa Regional
Communications Infrastructure Program (WARCIP APL 1B). WARCIP Guinea is fully in line
with the WARCIP program in terms of objectives, components and results framework. The
Program was approved by the Board on January 2011 and included Guinea as a candidate for
inclusion of APL 1-B. Guinea met the readiness triggers to join The WARCIP Program.
These triggers include (i) government commitment to liberalization and open access principles,
(ii) existence of PPP framework (or willingness to formulate one as part of preparatory
activities), and (iii) government commitment to increased sector competition as evidenced by
pro-competitive policy and regulatory frameworks. The decision of including Guinea in second
series of projects under the first phase of the Program is based on detailed analysis of country
readiness and commitment to additional sector reforms. This inclusion is also prompted by the
urgent request by Guinea to meet tight deadlines for participation in the ACE cable.
Project Development Objectives (PDO) and PDO Indicators
21. The project development objective of WARCIP-Guinea is to increase the
geographical reach of broadband networks and reduce costs of communications services in
the territory of Guinea2.
2 All the other countries that are covered by the various APL phases of WARCIP have the same PDO.
15
22. The PDO-level results indicators are below.
Table 1: PDO level results indicators
Outcome Indicators At closing of the project
Volume of international traffic (Kbit/s per person)
Access to telephone services (%)
Access to internet services (%)
Average monthly price of wholesale international E1 capacity link from capital
city to Europe
Number of direct project beneficiaries, of which female
11 kbit/s per person
47.5 %
0.7%
U$2,000
5.6 million (51%)
Summary of Project Components
23. The project will have 3 components (i) Infrastructure component to improve connectivity,
(ii) Technical Assistance component to create enabling environment, and (iii) Implementation
support.
Component 1 – Supporting Connectivity (US$25.20 million)
24. The main focus of the project is to connect Guinea to ACE. Improving international
connectivity through funding access to ACE submarine cable is the main focus of WARCIP-
Guinea. Other connectivity priorities are treated as a secondary focus.
a) International connectivity: US$24.2 million
25. International connectivity will be improved through financing Guinea’s consortium
fee to the ACE submarine cable. The bulk of this component (US$24.2 million) will be used to
finance Guinea‟s participation in ACE. The ACE project is proceeding quickly, with substantial
payment requirements of its members. Guinea has already made two payments amounting to
US$4.3 million since June 2010 through the state operator SOTELGUI. The project will help
Guinea finance the balance due to ACE for a total of US$24.3 million. Given the schedule of
payments, World Bank support of US$3.5 million will be made under retroactive financing (to
cover the payment already made on March 17 through third party financing), an additional
US$3.5 million through PPA resources (due on May 30, 2011) and the remaining funds will take
the form of direct disbursement to ACE.
26. GoG payments to ACE will be made on behalf of GUILAB (Guinea Broadband
Company- La Guinéenne pour la Large Bande”) and partly reimbursed by GUILAB’s
private participants before the cable becomes operational. GUILAB was created as a Special
16
Purpose Vehicle (SPV) company to finance and manage the access to ACE capacity and the
landing station in Conakry, as well as potentially other infrastructure investments (e.g. national
backbone network). Discussion with operators revealed high level of interest from the private
sector (both from mobile operators and from Internet Service Providers) to co-finance the
landing station and to be associated with operating and managing the facility and cable capacity.
The Remaining GoG shares will be made available to other parties under a divestment plan.
Original shareholders of GUILAB could also be offered the opportunity to increase their shares
in GUILAB and acquire additional capacity. Orange Guinea is also a signatory to the ACE
Consortium through their parent company Orange. Discussion is ongoing between GUILAB and
Orange Guinea for collocation of equipment at the landing station.
b) Regional connectivity (US$ 1 million)
27. While international fiber optic links could potentially facilitate better and cheaper access
to communications in Guinea, the full benefits of this access cannot be achieved without further
investments in national infrastructure and effective use of ICT for critical services. IDA
resources will therefore be used to fund a (i) national Internet Exchange Point (IXP) and (ii)
development of high speed government virtual network for selected Government institutions in
Conakry.
Component 2- Creating an Enabling Environment for improved connectivity (US$6.80
million)
28. This component will provide Technical Assistance (TA) and the capacity building
necessary to support the successful implementation of Component 1 of the project. Specifically, Component 2 will focus on the transaction design and operating model for
ownership and management of international, regional and national infrastructure using PPP
frameworks consistent with open access principles to create an enabling environment for
improved connectivity.3 The PPP frameworks would focus on principles of open and non-
discriminatory access while maximizing the role of the private sector. This component will also
see the strengthening of the policy and regulatory environment to promote further sector reform
in order to maximize benefits from access to international capacity. Most of the activities under
enabling environment are included as part of the Project Preparation Advance (PPA).
29. Specifically the following activities will be implemented.
(i) Support to optimize the governance, ownership and financing issues related to
the operation of the landing station and provision of networks and services
emanating from the ACE cable. This support will take the form of establishing the
SPV and defining the PPP framework for cable landing
(ii) Legal and regulatory safeguards for open access
(iii) Supporting regulatory reforms and strengthening the capacity of ARPT
3 Open access is broadly defined as an equal opportunity for operators to have unfettered access to given
infrastructure or services under similar terms and conditions
17
(iv) Strategic plan for repositioning SOTELGUI in the market and implementation
support
(v) Support for MPTNTI in key strategic issues on PPP and open access for backbone
financing and management and related regulatory instruments and building
capacity of MPTNTI
(vi) Development of legal, regulatory framework to promote cross-border and national
flows of information and data in broadband networks and provision of
institutional strengthening for creating additional demand through increased usage
of the broadband infrastructure including domain name regulation and capacity
strengthening of AGETIC. (Agence des Technologies de l‟information et des
télécommunications-Agency for ICT)4.
Component 3: Project implementation (US$ 2 million).
30. This component will include support for setting up the Project Implementation Unit
(PIU), support for environmental and social studies, communications and M&E as well as
initial support to GUILAB.
31. The project will have a contingency of US$500,000 for unexpected expenses.
Consistency with Regional and Country Strategies
32. The proposed operation is part of a broader World Bank re-engagement strategy for
Guinea. The operation is included in the Interim Strategy Note as one of the first operations for
re-engagement, following the arrears clearance in April 2011. Given the Bank‟s key focus on the
stabilization of the economy and the resumption of growth, the proposed ICT operation will help
Guinea address key connectivity gaps and respond to the sector needs for reforms. The
Government of Guinea will also take advantage of Bank support to structure the connection to
ACE as a Public Private Partnership on an open access basis and to bring needed reforms to the
sector.
33. The proposed operation is fully in line with the March 21, 2011 Regional Integration
Assistance Strategy (RIAS) Update “ Partnering for Africa’s Regional Integration and the
West Africa Implementation Action Plan (2010). The RIAS seeks to create economies of
scale, facilitate intra-regional trade and exports and connect landlocked countries to regional and
global trade routes by reducing barriers to movement of goods and services between countries
and improve the regional business environment. WARCIP is featured as a flagship project in the
RIAS Update.
34. The proposed operation is fully in line with the March 2011 Africa Strategy
“Africa’s Future and the World Bank’s Support to It. By facilitating cheaper access to
internet and supporting the development of national and regional communications infrastructure,
4 This is the first ICT agency in Guinea. Established in 2011, this agency is tasked with the role of implementing the
ICT policy and supporting ICT applications in Guinea.
18
WARCIP Guinea will create sustainable employment (Pillar 1 Competitiveness & employment )
and will create a critical building block for ICT applications (Foundation Governance & Public
sector capacity). The program also focused on partnerships by leveraging private sector
investment in the ACE submarine cable.
Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes
35. A full connectivity solution will promote cheaper access to communications and
more effective global integration. WARCIP Guinea proposes to contribute to a full
connectivity solution, building on new and existing communications opportunities. The proposed
project is expected to focus on catalytic financing for additional links to international and
national infrastructure (where gaps exist that cannot be addressed by the private sector, and
where there‟s clear evidence of positive externalities). By gaining access to international cables,
Guinea will have better and cheaper access to communications and be able to connect more
effectively with the rest of the world.
36. Intensification of broadband networks will stimulate investment and economic
growth. The contribution of broadband networks to economic growth is much more pronounced
than that of narrowband networks. Additional studies have confirmed that for every 10
percentage-point increase in high-speed internet connections, there is an increase in economic
growth of 1.3 percentage points.5 New businesses in the ICT and IT enable services sectors are
supported by improved access to high-speed internet. The mobile phone platform is highlighted
especially as the single most powerful way to reach and deliver public and private services to
hundreds of millions of people in remote and rural areas across the developing world.
37. WARCIP Guinea will increase access to ICT services, lower costs and improve
service quality. By addressing connectivity bottlenecks, the proposed project will support
Guinea in obtaining better and shared access to ICT services with improved quality and reduced
cost, allowing improved communications and information dissemination, better access to limited
public resources which could in turn facilitate a smoother transition from post-conflict recovery
to long-term development. By providing technical assistance to help the GoG create an enabling
environment for the ICT sector as well as resources to improve connectivity, the proposed
project would leverage the sector as a key driver of growth, competitiveness, and improved
governance. This could assist the GoG in achieving its vision, by using ICT to transform service
delivery in its priority areas of agriculture, energy, transport infrastructure, education, health, and
water/sanitation and helping to achieve its objective of increased growth and improved human
development.
D. Appraisal of Project Activities
Economic and financial analysis
38. A detailed financial analysis was carried out for the international connectivity
subcomponent to be financed under the project. Annex 10 provides a summary of the cost-
benefit analysis and a detailed report is available in the Project files.
5 Word Bank - Information and Communications for Development 2009: Extending Reach and Increasing Impact.
19
39. Connecting to ACE will see Guinea investment breakeven between 2014 and 2015
with a Net Present Value to 2025 of US $24.8 million. The IRR is 22.4% assuming an average
bandwidth sale price of $100/Mbit/s/month, and an IRR of 14.3%, assuming $50/Mbit/s/month.
The latter figure is likely to be more competitive and would stimulate more use, and takes into
account bandwidth pricing trends in other regions such as East Africa. The final breakeven year
will depend on actual capacity uptake and the wholesale price of bandwidth. After 2024 at the
latest, the project would be cash-flow positive and substantial revenues would be made if these
wholesale pricing levels are maintained. Investment data was calculated based on a discount rate
of 15%. On this basis, membership in ACE, if accompanied by robust regulation to ensure
competitive pricing releases demand and stimulates national backbone development, has
potential to provide low cost international access to a broad range of the population in Guinea.
Technical
40. Technical design of the project reflects lessons learned in the ICT sector and
international best practices. For most developing countries, a major obstacle to the uptake of
ICT remains the lack of adequate access to ICT infrastructure. A lack of investment in ICT
infrastructure and access networks, coupled with inefficient provision of services, are the most
important factors undermining the development of networked economies. The main lesson
derived is that success is mainly market driven. Creating a predictable legal and policy
environment is key to improving investor confidence and restoring trust in the ICT sector. The
focus of the proposed project is to create a PPP framework for international connectivity. The
project will establish an enabling institutional and regulatory environment to help attract and
sustain investment in the telecommunications sector.
41. The ACE cable is deemed to be technically qualified and structured according to
best practice in the industry. The team‟s assessment is that the ACE consortium is being
structured in a manner consistent with international good practices in the industry, and is led by
major industry players. Given the experience of key consortium members in designing,
commissioning and operating submarine cables, the implementation risk is minimal. As with all
cables, there is, however, a risk of breaks in the operational system.
Legal and regulatory
42. (a) Transactional Issues. On the transactional side, this can be divided into the “wet”
segment and the domestic (cable landing station (CLS)) segment. The transactional issue on the
wet segment relates to (i) succession of the SPV vehicles from the parties to the existing C&MA,
and (ii) the ability of the GoG to divest their interests in the SPVs that are making the investment
into the ACE consortium, as well as unbundling the equity interest in the consortium from the
capacity allocated to the SPV. The C&MA permits certain transfers of parties‟ rights in certain
circumstances. In other circumstances, transfers would require to be made possible either in a
specific amendment to the C&MA permitting SOTELGUI to transfer its rights to a SPV or by
obtaining the consent of the parties. The ACE C&MA permits a party to transfer its interest
(without the other parties‟ consent) to (i) a subsidiary (>50%), (ii) an entity that controls it
(>50%), or (iii) a sister company (i.e., an entity controlled by the same entity as controls the
original party (>50%)).
20
43. (b) Regulatory Issues. The main issue is ensuring “open access” (fair and transparent
pricing) to the capacity provided by the ACE cable at the domestic level once the capacity comes
on shore. This is primarily a domestic regulatory issue. A review of the agreement indicates
transparent access to known capacity at known prices. A review of the regulatory sector,
including licensing conditions, will be conducted at the national level. As indicated above, the
PPA was designed to include technical assistance to support these activities.
Social and environmental
44. Connection to the ACE cable is not expected to have significant environmental
impact. The proposed project is rated as a Category B project. The cable system is likely to have
a submerged or „wet plant‟ part, and a „dry plant‟ part which interfaces at proposed Landing
Stations. The Landing Station is the location where a submarine or other underwater cable makes
landfall. The landing (or termination) station can also be the point at which the submarine cable
connects into the land-based infrastructure or network. Sections of the cable (particularly both
wet and dry plants of each country‟s lateral connection to the main cable) lie within the territorial
waters of the landing parties while remaining sections lie in international waters, normally in
deep seas. The lateral connecting cable to Conakry is connecting to the main cable well beyond
the 2500 m isobath. Deep ocean fiber optic cables are no larger than 17-21 mm diameter – about
the size of a domestic garden hose- and are laid mainly upon the surface of the ocean floor.
45. Little evidence of environmental issues in deep ocean: Since much of the deep ocean
lies beyond national jurisdictions, few environmental impact assessments (EIAs) for any marine
activities have been undertaken in this zone and thus there is little evidence of any environmental
issues, except in cases of oil and gas exploration and very deep sea trawling. No specific
environmental studies are undertaken for submarine cables; however, prior to laying cables, a
detailed Cable Route Survey is done to ensure that the cable is not located in high risk locations
or geological features (e.g., thermal vents) that often harbour unique faunal assemblages at
abyssal depths. Most of the larger companies operating in the submarine cable industry typically
work to standards and quality management systems set by the International Organization for
Standards under the ISO 9000 and ISO 9001 schemes. Furthermore, the International Cable
Protection Committee (ICPC) publishes recommendations on key issues such as cable routing,
cable protection and cable recovery that are available to anyone on request. This very stringent
standard puts pressure on cable companies to adhere to strict environmental standards. The
general experience is that the section of the cable that lies in the deep sea has minimal impact on
marine mammals and fish. The extensive studies that are undertaken by the cable suppliers prior
to final cable laying tend to work as effective safeguards against any possible environmental
disruption, since in large part they are intended to identify routes for the cable that will avoid
seamounts, volcanoes, canyons, vents, seeps, deepwater reefs, dissected terrain – all areas that
tend to be associated with higher biological value than the general abyssal plain.
46. The cable is not expected to have any perceptible effect on the quality of the coastal
waters of the Atlantic Ocean or on marine species or habitat: As the cable gets closer to the
shores in water depths shallower than 1,500m, the cable‟s diameter may increase to about 40-50
mm due to the need to add protective wire armoring. The small environmental disturbances
caused by laying connecting cable from the shore in Guinea to a deep sea submarine fiber optic
cable are not expected to have any perceptible effect on the quality of the coastal waters of the
21
Atlantic Ocean or on marine species or habitat. For the cable and associated equipment onshore,
there may be some temporary, low to moderate environmental and social impacts including
localized impacts to near shore marine life and local fishermen access.
47. Given the emergency nature of the project an ESSAF has been developed and will
be followed by an ESIA, ESMP and/or RAP not later than one hundred twenty (120) days
after effectiveness of the Financing Agreement. In accordance with OP/BP. 8.00 an
Environmental and Social Screening and Assessment Framework (ESSAF) for the proposed
operation has been conducted. A preliminary safeguard assessment has been undertaken which
concludes that the environmental and social impacts are minimal. The site selected for cable
landing or Terminal Station is approximately 700 meters from the Beach Man hole (BMH) at the
beach. The land currently has no permanent structures. The landing station is expected to take
about 45m x 25m land space with approximately half of this space for equipment and the balance
for maintenance, training, and office spaces.
48. Preliminary assessment shows minimal social impact, if any. The project will not
cause any permanent or temporary structure to be demolished. It will only create temporary
inconveniences during the construction phase and limited economic disadvantages to business
concerns. There is no land acquisition issue as the site for the Landing Station is vacant state
property which has been allocated to the project for the purpose.
49. The ESSAF provides guidance on the approach to be taken during implementation
of the operation and the planning of mitigation measures, including consultation and
disclosure requirements, to ensure due diligence and facilitate consistent treatment of
environmental and social issues. Specific actions will include: a) incorporating environmental
considerations into its planning, management and operational activities; (b) having an
Environmental and Safety Coordinator/consultant to be directly responsible for environmental
and safety issues during construction and operation; (c) allocating and maintain resources for the
effective implementation of the ESIA/ ESMP; and, d) including relevant safeguard mitigation
measures in the tender documents for the connectivity components. OP/BP 7.50-on “Projects on
International Waterways” does not apply.
50. While the main cables are to be placed in non-territorial, deep sea locations, OP/BP 7.50,
Projects on International Waterways, does not apply. The types of waterways covered under the
policy do not contemplate an “open sea.” For purposes of the policy, international waterways
include semi-enclosed coastal waters, closed seas, national rivers flowing into those waters, and
transboundary groundwater. It should be noted that the definition of international waterways
under the policy is at variance with the definitions under the rules established by the
International Law Association, as well as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Non-
Navigational Uses of International Waters Watercourses.
51. The proposed project is expected to have positive social benefits. The main social
impacts of the proposed project are the increased possibility of better access to ICT services for
the population and improved GoG service delivery. The project will contribute to (i) enabling
ICT to become a driver for sustainable economic growth; (ii) enabling the GoG to use ICT to
improve services; (iii) improving access and quality of ICT services for the general population,
22
businesses, and the GoG; and (iv)reducing isolation and enhancing economic activities in rural
areas
Lessons learned and reflected in Project design
52. The project builds on general lessons learned in the ICT sector. Key lessons learned
and applied to the project design are: (1) project development objectives should be realistic,
focused and achievable in the country, sector and implementing agency context; (b) project
components should support country priorities and have broad ownership among stakeholders; (c)
project design should be flexible to adapt to a rapidly changing environment; (d) implementation
support should be included in Project activities with a focus on retaining staff to ensure
continuity and an accumulation of capacity within the implementing agency; and (e) activities
should aim to yield quick returns, build basic building blocks to support transition from
emergency recovery to medium to long term reconstruction and development, and be sustainable
over the long term.
53. The Project builds also on specific lessons learned in preparation of phase of
WARCIP APL 1A. Specific lessons from WARCIP APL 1A include payment mechanisms for
membership fees for the ACE submarine cable, safeguard issues related to landing stations,
formulation of tailored public private partnership (PPP) arrangements and open access principles.
E. Institutional Arrangements and Financing Plan
54. A PIU will be established within the MPTNTI and will be responsible for the overall
coordination, implementation, and supervision of the project. The PIU will be headed by a
Project Coordinator who will report to the Minister. The PIU will be assisted by a core project
team composed of a Procurement, a Financial Management Specialist, an accountant and support
staff. The PIU will also have a consultant on a part time basis dealing with M&E and
environment specialist to support with the elaboration and implementation of safeguard plans.
The PIU will be in charge of (i) day-to-day activities under the project, in particular,
procurement and monitoring activities; (ii) coordination with the other entities responsible for
project implementation; (iii) preparation of annual work programs, budgets, and procurement
plans under the project; (iv) dissemination of external audit reports; and (v) implementation of
their recommendations.
55. The PIU will implement the project with support of a focal points forum. The PIU
will be assisted by a project team called focal points forum, composed of one representative from
MPTNTI, MoF, ARPT, SOTELGUI and the Private sector. The focal points are not consultants
hired under the project. They are professionals from their respective entities. The project does
not take into account their remuneration.
Project costs and financing plan
56. This Project will be financed by an IDA Grant. The lending instrument is an
Adaptable Program Loan (APL). WARCIP -Guinea is part of WARCIP (WARCIP APL 1B) the
second series of projects under the first phase of APL 1-B of the regional WARCIP program.
The objectives of WARCIP-Guinea are fully in line with the objectives of the WARCIP
program.
23
57. The costs of this Project by component, including refinancing of the PPF advance, are
below.
Table 3: Component costs.
Activities
Estimated cost (in US$
million) Component 1 – Supporting Connectivity 25.2
Component 2- Creating an Enabling Environment for improved connectivity 6.8
Component 3: Project implementation and contingency 2.0
Total 34
Results Monitoring and Evaluation
58. The PIU will monitor and evaluate the project. The Project Implementation Unit (PIU)
will bear the primary responsibility for project Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of both project
progress and project outcomes, and, as such, will establish standard formats and guidelines for
data collection and reporting, and will organize training sessions for project stakeholders in their
use. The PIU will submit to MPTNTI the M&E quarterly report that will include the updated
Results Framework and the Action Table, listing the corrective actions to be implemented with
deadlines and persons responsible clearly identified. The report will be sent to the Bank for
information.
59. The views of direct beneficiaries will be brought into the monitoring and evaluation
process. Comprehensive M&E reporting will be needed to monitor the results and performance
of the proposed project. It will involve mainly the direct beneficiaries of project activities, but
will be extended to other beneficiaries such as telecommunications operators and private ICT
firms, which ultimately are the main beneficiaries of the proposed project‟s outcomes. The PIU
will review and validate the reports on performance indicators and recommend corrective actions
if necessary. There will be focal points who will be responsible for providing relevant
information and monitoring progress, using relevant performance indicators.
Financial Management Arrangements
60. In line with the guidelines stated in the Financial Management Practices Manual issued
by the Financial Management Sector Board on March 1, 2010, a financial management
assessment of the Ministry of Post and Telecommunications was conducted. The financial
management risk rating for the PIU is Substantial (Medium – Impact).
61. The project financial management is weakened by: (i) lack of experienced financial
management staff, (ii) inexistence of adequate administrative, accounting and financial
procedures manual and appropriate accounting software, (iii) no previous experience of the staff
and the Ministry of Post and Telecommunication with IDA financed-projects and IDA fiduciary
procedures, (iv)weak internal control environment.
24
62. To mitigate the country and entity risks, (i) a new stand-alone PIU will have the overall
FM responsibility of the project and will work closely with Focal Points in charge of technical
execution of the different Project‟s components. (ii) a Financial Management Specialist with
competence and experience satisfactory to the Bank will be recruited to handle the fiduciary
function. (iii) an administrative, accounting and financial procedures manual covering all
fiduciary aspects of the project will be used, (iv) a new computerized accounting system will be
purchased to process financial data and produce accurate and reliable financial statements, (iv)
an external independent auditor with TORs acceptable for IDA will be recruited to perform, on
annual basis, the audit of the project.
Procurement
63. IDA funding for component 1 (a) on international connectivity does not go towards
a procurable item subject to compliance with World Bank procurement guidelines. This is
because such funding is for membership fees (paid in different instalments) against a set of rights
including use of a certain amount of capacity at preferred rates and a share of ownership of an
indivisible cable infrastructure asset.
64. For other project components (1 b, components 2 and 3), IDA procurement
guidelines will apply and Procurement activities will be carried out by the Project
Implementation Unit (PIU) to be created in the Ministry. This PIU will be staffed by a Project
Coordinator, a Procurement Specialist, a Financial Management Specialist, Monitoring and
Evaluation Specialist. Meanwhile, the fiduciary function for WARCIP Project Preparation
Advance is entrusted to the “Education Pour Tous” project team, attached to the Ministry of
Education. This PIU is currently implementing the PPA on an interim basis until the PIU under
the MPTNTI is established.
65. An assessment of the capacity of the MPTNTI to implement procurement actions
for the project has been carried out on April 14th, 2011. The assessment reviewed the
organizational structure for implementing the project and concluded that the overall project risk
for procurement is substantial. Risks and mitigation measures are detailed in annex 6 related
to procurement.
25
Implementation support
66. Implementation support missions will be conducted at least twice a year. The GoG,
through the PIU, may perform evaluations jointly with the World Bank team and conduct
supervision or implementation support missions at least twice a year. Missions will be based on
the latest quarterly implementation and financial monitoring reports prepared and submitted by
the Ministry.
F. Key Risks and Mitigating Measures
67. The key Project risks and planned mitigations processes are outlined below and are
expanded in the Operational Risk Assessment Framework (ORAF) included in Annex 4. The
table below focuses on project risks only.
Table 4: Main risks and Mitigation measures
Main risks Mitigation measures
Inadequate interest from Private sector to
finance connectivity PPPs
PPA has been approved to support PPP structures that will make it
attractive for private investment. Private sector already signaled
significant interest under transparent conditions. GUILAB is
already created with participation from SOTELGUI, Government,
mobile operators and ISPs for the landing station.
Delays in Government implementation of
divestiture of SPV shares to private
operators
Targeted support will be provided under Technical Assistance
component of the project as well as supporting a financial
engineering approach linking purchase of capacity to share
allocation the process and ensure success.
Potential "veto" by existing private licensees
and government operators over different
aspects of the program.
Detailed due diligence to identify incentives for existing operators
to willingly participate in the proposed infrastructure is part of this
project.
Limited institutional capacity TA program included both the PPA and under the project to
enhance capacity of stakeholders, including capacity support to
SOTELGUI, ARPT, MPTNTI, GUILAB and the PIU
Difficulties changing ACE CMA signatory
and handing over rights and responsibilities of
SOTELGUI to GUILAB
Discussion with ACE ongoing at management level
Risk of delays could result in penalty to
clients for missing ACE payment milestone
Discussion with ACE Consortium on flexibility of installment
payments
Main Risks Mitigation measures
Project commercially not viable due to
insufficient demand for services
Early results of traffic assessment were conducted during project
preparation confirming viability of the project. Additional demand
stimulating approaches will be explored during project
implementation
Risk of national backbone not materializing
for lack of financing from other donors
Government Discussions with Islamic Development Bank are quite
advanced. The European investment Bank is also interested in this
area. Other bilateral donors have expressed interest as well.
68. In IDA‟s assessment, the potentially high benefits of the proposed operation outweigh the
risk of the project and warrant IDA‟s assistance for implementing critical reforms and policy
actions in a coordinated fashion with other donors, while supporting risk mitigation actions to
maximize the sustainability of the reform agenda.
26
G. Terms and Conditions for Project Financing
A. The proposed IDA financing would be provided on Standard IDA grant terms. The IDA
grant would finance 100 percent of project expenditures, including taxes. The Government had
secured a Project Preparation Facility (PPF) advance of US$5 million to support Project
preparation activities.
B. Effectiveness conditions/covenants
A. Effectiveness conditions:
(a) GUILAB has been fully established and operational, in form and substance
satisfactory to the Association, in the territory of the Recipient, including through the
appointment of its director general and the adoption of its shareholders‟ agreement and its
by-laws.
(b) With Sotelgui‟s acquiescence, the ACE Consortium has transferred to GUILAB
all the rights and obligations of Sotelgui in the Construction and Maintenance Agreement
and has fully substituted Sotelgui with GUILAB as the member of the ACE Consortium.
(c) The Contractual Arrangement, in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association, has been entered into between the Recipient and GUILAB.
(d) The Recipient shall have established the PIU under terms of reference and with
staff in number and with qualifications satisfactory to the Association. As part of such
staffing, there shall be in place for the PIU: (i) the Project coordinator; and (ii) a financial
management and a procurement specialist, all of them under terms of reference and with
qualifications and experience satisfactory to the Association.
(e) The Recipient shall have adopted the Project Implementation Manual in form and
substance satisfactory to the Association.
B. Disbursement Conditions:
Set up a computerized financial and accounting system: By disbursements for component 1.b, 2
and 3
C. Legal covenants:
1. The Recipient shall:
(a) not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after the Effective Date, prepare,
consult upon and disclose the ESIA, ESMP, and/or the RAP, as the case may be, as
approved by the Association;
(b) ensure that the construction of the landing station related to component 1.1 of the
Project does not commence until and unless: (i) the Association shall have approved the
ESIA, ESMP, and/or the RAP, as the case may be, and the same documents have been
consulted upon and disclosed as approved by the Association pursuant to the provisions
of paragraph (a) of this Section D; and (ii) it shall have verified, through its own staff,
outside experts, or existing environmental/social institutions, that the activities under
27
component 1.a of the Project meet the environmental and social requirements of
appropriate national and local authorities and that they are consistent with the
Association‟s applicable environmental and social assessment and safeguard policies and
comply with the environmental and social review procedures set forth in the Project
Implementation Manual;
(c) take all measures required on its behalf to carry out, or to ensure that GUILAB
carry out, the ESIA, ESMP, and/or the RAP, as the case may be, in accordance with the
provisions of the ESSAF; and
(d) ensure that the relevant mitigation and monitoring provisions of the ESIA, ESMP,
and/or RAP, as the case may be, are appropriately implemented.
2. To facilitate the carrying out of component 1.a of the Project, the Recipient shall take all
action required: (i) to ensure the proceeds of the Grant allocated from time to time to
component 1.1 are transferred to GUILAB in an efficient and timely manner; and (ii) to
have in place a suitable legal framework to ensure the Grant is used for the intended
purposes.
3. The Recipient shall, not later than four (4) months after the Effective Date, recruit an
external auditor for the PIU on the basis of terms of reference and with qualifications and
experience satisfactory to the Association.
28
Annex 1: Detailed Description of Project Components
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
1. The project will have 3 components (i) Infrastructure component to improve connectivity
(ii) Technical Assistance component to create enabling environment, and (iii)
Implementation support.
Component 1 – Supporting Connectivity (US$25.2 million)
2. The main focus of the project is to connect Guinea to ACE. Improving international
connectivity through funding access to ACE submarine cable is the main focus of
WARCIP- Guinea. Other connectivity priorities are treated as a secondary focus.
International connectivity: US$24.2 million
3. For purposes of international connectivity along the coast of West Africa and with the rest
of the world, the most attractive and efficient viable option for Guinea is to connect to the
ACE, which is anticipated to be an approximately 17,000 km submarine cable system from
Europe to potentially South Africa and connecting 23 countries, including a landing station
in Conakry for Guinea. In all likelihood, there are no other opportunities for Guinea to
connect to another submarine cable for many years to come.
4. In total Guinea will pay US $25 million for a 2.8% share of capacity on the submarine
cable. The total estimated cost of the ACE submarine cable is around US$700 million
based on the final basic system configuration with 21 landing points and is to be
operational in mid -2012. On June 5, 2010, SOTELGUI signed the Construction and
Maintenance Agreement (C&MA) of the ACE consortium and committed to paying its
contribution of US$25 million. SOTELGUI was only able to pay US$840,000 initially. An
additional US$3.5 million was made by March 17, 2011 through third party financing. The
current security situation prevented the GoG to make payments due to ACE. Earlier
requests for World Bank support could not be acted upon as the Bank was not in a position
to engage with the de facto Government. The GoG has made a request to the Bank for
support to secure Guinea‟s participation in ACE as neither SOTELGUI nor the GoG is in a
position to cover the entirety of the US$25 million without concessional financing.
Honoring the entirety of the US$25 million will ensure that a cable landing station is
constructed in Conakry and that Guinea thereby gains access to the international capacity
to be made available by ACE‟s planned submarine fiber optic cable.
5. Given default of payment so far, project funding will be made in several installments
agreed with the ACE consortium. A first installment of US$3.5 million will be made under
PPA resources (by May 30, 2011); another installment will be made immediately after
project effectiveness to bring Guinea up to date with its payment obligations. The final
installments will follow the original milestone agreed with the members. The project will
also cover the payment made by the Government on March 17, 2011 under retroactive
financing.
29
6. GoG payment for ACE will be made on behalf of GUILAB and partly reimbursed by
GUILAB‟s private participants before the cable becomes operational. GUILAB is in the
was created as a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to finance and manage the access to ACE
and the landing station in Conakry as well as potentially other infrastructure investments
(national backbone network). Discussion with operators revealed high level of interest
from the private sector (both from mobile operators and from Internet Service Providers) to
co-finance the landing station and to be associated with operating and managing the
facility. The Remaining GoG shares will be made available to other parties under a
divestment plan. Original shareholders of GUILAB could also be offered the opportunity
to increase their shares in GUILAB and acquire additional capacity.
7. Pre-purchase discounted bandwidth for ministries and designated institutions will be
implemented as the need arises. GoG could consider making advance payment for the cost
of obtaining discounted price for Internet capacity (Internet access). In return for obtaining
this advance from GoG, GUILAB would provide subsidized Internet access to specific
ministries and / or institutions to be designated from time to time by GoG. Price paid by
the designated ministries and institutions for this service would be a discounted price,
lower than the normal wholesale or retail price for Internet access, possibly equal to the
actual costs of operation of GUILAB during the period in which the Internet service is
provided.
Regional connectivity (US$1 million)
8. Broadband will be provided to improve priority services. While international fiber links
could potentially facilitate better and cheaper access to communications in Guinea, the full
benefits of this access cannot be achieved without further investments in national
infrastructure and effective use of ICT for critical services. IDA resources will therefore be
used to fund a national Internet Exchange Point (IXP) and establish a virtual network
connecting key ministries in Conakry.
9. IDA resources will be further complemented by funding projected to come from the
Islamic Development Bank and possible the European Development Bank, for additional
national and cross-border infrastructure in Guinea. Funding is expected to be made in
parallel and likely to finance terrestrial broadband backbone fiber networks and broadband
connections within and between Guinea and its neighbors. GoG is still in the process of
finalizing discussions on this funding. It is important to note that the international
connectivity component of the project will be financed fully by WARCIP -Guinea project
and will not depend on availability of funding from the Islamic development Bank or other
donors.
Component 2- Creating an Enabling Environment for improved connectivity (US$6.80
million)
10. This component will provide Technical Assistance (TA) and the capacity building
necessary to support the successful implementation of Component 1 of the project.
Specifically, Component 2 will focus on the transaction design and operating model for
ownership and management of international, regional and national infrastructure using PPP
frameworks consistent with open access principles to create an enabling environment for
30
improved connectivity.6 The PPP frameworks would focus on principles of open and non-
discriminatory access while maximizing the role of the private sector. This component will
also see the strengthening of the policy and regulatory environment to promote further
sector reform in order to maximize benefits from access to international capacity. Most of
the activities under enabling environment are included as part of the Project Preparation
Advance (PPA).
11. Specifically the following activities will be implemented.
Support to optimize the governance, ownership and financing issues related to the operation of
the landing station and provision of networks and services emanating from the ACE cable
(US$500,000).
Under this activity legal and financial advisory services will be provided to put in place an
optimal structure for the landing station. Those services will include (i) designing and
negotiating instruments and contracts and related stakeholders agreements, (ii) defining the
rights and obligation of different equity stakeholders (GoG, SOTELGUI, private
operators…), and (iii) defining appropriate risk sharing and commensurate financial
rewards between parties.
12. Because of the urgency to secure participation in the ACE submarine cable and lead time
needed to put in place the structure for ownership and management of the landing station,
the proposed approach is to have GoG pre-finance the participation on behalf of GUILAB
and get re-imbursed partly before the project closes and ideally before ACE becomes
operational. The remaining GoG shares in GUILAB will also be divested. This activity will
support the GoG to put in place the divestiture strategy for Government shareholding. In
particular it will define the scope of the exit clauses, valuation of public shares, as well as
timing and transition process for divestiture.
Legal and regulatory safeguards for open access (U$350,000)
13. This activity will finance a detailed assessment of current legal and regulatory actions
needed to ensure open and non discriminatory access to cable landing facility and cable
capacity, including issues related to licensing of GUILAB: International gateway facilities,
fully liberalized international gateway (landing station), Open access regime (national and
international backbone essential facilities), Wholesale price cap control mechanism and
Quality outsourcing of O&M. Detailed development of instruments will be conducted
under the project.
Supporting regulatory reforms and strengthening the capacity of ARPT (US$ 1,500,000)
14. This activity has three sub-components (a) undertake an assessment of the sector regulator
ARPT and (b) support ARPT to develop key regulatory instruments and (c) provide
6 Open access is broadly defined as an equal opportunity for operators to have unfettered access to given
infrastructure or services under similar terms and conditions
31
capacity building support to ARPT with the objective to help put in place an effective
regulatory regime ahead of the cable landing.
(a) ARPT Assessment The assessment will cover organizational and functional matters
of ARPT. A sector fiscal study will also be conducted with the objective of defining
financing needs of ARPT and propose a new resource sharing mechanism between
ARPT and Government. This will also include a review of the incoming
international traffic and national interconnection tax and propose way forward
(b) Support on key regulatory priorities: Two priorities have been identified including
Technical Assistance to ARPT to implement effective broadband regulation and
Technical Assistance to ARPT to strengthen interconnection regulation. Support in
the area of broadband regulation aims at creating enabling environment for fair and
effective competition in broadband services. It will include (i) Wholesale access to
international and national capacity for ISPs, (ii) Price squeeze tests to ensure fair
competition between ISPs and operators, (iii) strengthening of frequency
management by ARPT to avoid interferences in the provision of broadband
services, etc. Support in the area of interconnection aims to strengthen
interconnection regulation. It will (i) review interconnection reference agreements
according to international best practice, (ii) implement appropriate cost models to
set cost oriented interconnection rates (possibly with a glide path approach), (iii)
recommend appropriate actions on operational issues raised by operators, etc.
(c) Capacity building: This activity could take several forms including study tours,
twinning arrangements, workshops, international advisors to support ARPT with
discussions with operators, and to support with resolution of disputes about
interpretation of license terms and conditions, etc. A training and capacity building
plan will be developed and implemented during the project
Strategic plan for SOTELGUI and support to implement the strategic plan (US$1,350,000)
15. The arrival of the ACE submarine cable will create a new dynamic in the sector. A
strategic study will help the GoG position SOTELGUI in the new environment and adopt a clear
action plan for the repositioning of SOTELGUI in the sector ahead of the landing of the cable.
SOTELGUI has been privatized in the past but this is widely considered as an unsuccessful
experience as the strategic partner (Telecom Malaysia) pulled out in 2008. Soon after, the
MPTNTI launched a privatization strategy: 3 operators have been selected after the pre-
qualification stage, but the process came to a hold when the political climate deteriorated.
Support for MPTNTI on key policy issues and building capacity at Ministry of Posts,
Telecommunications and New Information Technologies (MPTNTI) (US$ 1,600,000)
16. The project will support the MPTNTI in key activities related to the development of a
strategic framework for backbone financing, development and management to secure open
access and will provide support to (support to the MPTNTI in the area of ICT policy formulation
and implementation complementing support provided by other donors in the sector. The project
32
will also include capacity building support to the ministry through training, study tours and
hiring of advisors.
Support to the Government to create and enabling environment for improved cross-border and
national flows of information and data in broadband networks (US$ 1,500,000)
17. This project will bring much needed high speed bandwidth for Guinea. To ensure adequate
safeguards around its use and promote the cross-border flows of information and data in
broadband networks, the project will support the government to create an enabling legal and
regulatory environment in line with international standards. Key elements needed include e-
contracting and e-commerce, cyber-security (including cyber crime), data privacy protection,
freedom of and access to information, etc. This component will support the GoG to develop a
policy and institutional framework and management for Internet level domain name and
implement a management policy for Internet domain names. It will finally provide capacity
building support to the AGETIC (Agence des Technologies de l‟Information et de la
Communication) recently created to support the development of e-applications in Guinea.
Component 3: Project implementation (US$ 2.0 million).
18. This component will include support for setting up the Project Implementation Unit (PIU),
support for environmental studies, communications and M&E as well as initial support to
GUILAB. The project will also have a contingency for US$ 500,000.
19. A PIU will be established within the MPTNTI and will be responsible for the overall
coordination, implementation, and supervision of the project. The PIU will be headed by a
Project Coordinator who will report the Minister. The PIU will be assisted by a core project team
composed of a Procurement and external Financial Management Specialist and representatives
from the MPTNTI. The PIU will be in charge of (i) day-to-day activities under the project, in
particular, procurement and monitoring activities; (ii) coordination with the other entities
responsible for project implementation; (iii) preparation of annual work programs, budgets, and
procurement plans under the project; (iv) dissemination of internal and external audit reports;
and (v) implementation of their recommendations.
19. Environmental studies This activity includes funding and disclosure of the ESSAF as well as
an Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMP) and a Resettlement Action Plans
(RAPs) (if project affected persons (PAPs) are two hundred or more) or Abbreviated
Resettlement Action Plans (ARAPs) where the PAPs are less than two hundred will be prepared
in response to the OP 4.12 which has been triggered. These documents will be prepared through
consultations and will be reviewed and cleared by the World Bank. The ESSAF has been
prepared and disclosed. The ESMP and RAP will be prepared during project implementation.
20. Communications and M&E support. The PIU will recruit or designate a person responsible
for M&E, based on the capacity assessment of the PIU staff right after effectiveness. More
specifically, the person responsible for M&E will liaise with all the project‟s stakeholders
(through designated focal points) to gather relevant information and data regularly. Additional
activities would include conducting surveys to ensure a good monitoring and evaluation of the
33
project. The project will also cover the costs related to communications strategy for the project
and implementation of the strategy to reach out to the public and increase awareness of the
project.
34
Annex 2: Results Framework and Monitoring
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
PDO: To increase the geographical reach of broadband networks and reduce costs of communications services in Guinea
Program/Project DO Level Results
Indicators* Co
re
Unit of
Measure
Baseline
(2010)
Cumulative Target Values**
Frequenc
y
Data
Source/
Methodolo
gy
Responsibili
ty for Data
Collection
YR 1 YR 2 YR3 YR 4 YR5
Indicator One: Volume of international
traffic: International Communications
(Internet, Telecoms, and Data)
bandwidth per person7
kbit/s per
person
5
[Dec
2010]
7 8 9 11 11 Yearly Operators PIU / ARPT
Indicator Two: Access to internet
services (Internet users per 100 people)
Number
per 100
0.3
[Dec.
2010]
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 6 months Operators PIU / ARPT
Indicator Three: Access to telephone
services (fixed mainlines plus cellular
phones per 100 people)
Number
per 100
34.7
[Sept.
2010]
39.9 43.5 45.5 47.5 4.75 6 months Operators PIU / ARPT
Indicator Four: average monthly price
of wholesale international E1 capacity
link from capital city to Europe8
US$/
month/2M
bit/s
US$8,000
[Sep.
2010]
Less than
US$8,000
Less than US$7,000
Less than
US$ 5,000
Less than
US$2,000
Less than
US$2,00
0
Yearly Operators PIU / ARPT
Indicator Five: Direct project
beneficiaries, of which female9
Number,
%
3.7million
51%
[Sept.
2010]
4.3million
51%
4.8million
51%
5.2million
51%
5.6million
51%
5.6millio
n
51%
Yearly Survey10 ARPT
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS
Intermediate Result (Component One):
7 This indicator measures the volume of international traffic
8 This indicator measures the average price of international communications 9 Number of active fixed and mobile subscribers (internet subscribers not counted to avoid double counting. Assumes % female on a pro-rata basis using the current figure in the total population for
YR1 till YR5: 51%
10 The Direct Project Beneficiaries survey will be coordinated by ARPT and will use different stakeholders of the ICT sector to collect information from a representative sample of beneficiaries.
35
Program/Project DO Level Results
Indicators* Co
re
Unit of
Measure
Baseline
(2010) Cumulative Target Values**
Frequenc
y
Data
Source/
Methodolo
gy
Responsibili
ty for Data
Collection
Intermediate Result indicator One:
Volume of available international
capacity: International Communications
(Internet, Telecoms, and Data)
bandwidth
In Gbit/s 0.15
[Dec.
2010]
0.15 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Yearly ARPT
ARPT
Intermediate Result indicator Two:
Retail price of internet services (per
Mbit/s per Month, in US$)
US$/month $1,200
[Dec. 2010]
$1,200 $1,000 Less than
$800
Less than
$500 Less
than
$500
6 months Operators ARPT/PIU
Intermediate Result (Component Two):
Intermediate Result indicator One:
Impact on Telecom sector of World
Bank technical assistance (composite
score)
1-low
impact to
5 –high
impact
0 1 2 3 3 3 Yearly ARPT PIU
36
Annex 3: Summary of Estimated Project Costs
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
Activities Total (US$
million)
Component 1 – Supporting Connectivity 25.2
International connectivity (Financing GoG Participation in ACE) 24.200
Regional connectivity 1.000
Component 2- Creating an Enabling Environment for improved connectivity 6.8
Support to optimize the governance, ownership and financing issues related to the
operation of the landing station and provision of networks and services
0.500
Legal and regulatory safeguards for open access 0.350
Supporting regulatory reforms and strengthening the capacity of ARPT
ARPT Assessment
Support on key regulatory priorities
Capacity building
1.500
Strategic plan and implementation support for SOTELGUI repositioning in the
market
1.350
Support for Policy maker for backbone strategy and building capacity at Ministry
of Posts, Telecommunications and New Information Technologies (MPTNTI)
1. 600.
Development of legal/ regulatory framework increased cross border and national
use of ICT services capacity development for AGETIC
1.500
Component 3: Project implementation 1. 5 million
PIU set up and operating expenses 0.750
Communications, M&E and environnemental 0.250
Initial support to GUILAB 0.500
Contingency 0.500
Total (US$ million) 34
37
Annex 4: Operational Risk Assessment Framework (ORAF)
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
Project Development Objective(s)
To increase the geographical reach of broadband networks and reduce costs of communications services in Guinea
PDO Level Results
Indicators: Volume of international traffic (Kbit/s per person)
Access to telephone services (%)
Access to internet services (%)
Average monthly price of wholesale international E1 capacity link from capital city to Europe
Number of direct project beneficiaries, of which female
38
Risk Category
Risk
Rating
Risk Description Proposed Mitigation Measures
Project Stakeholder Risks
MI Lack of collaboration of stakeholders Divestment process less successful than anticipated Difficulties changing ACE CMA signatory and handing over rights and responsibilities of SOTELGUI to GUILAB
Support under PPA to develop PPP structures that will make it attractive for private investment. Private sector already signaled significant interest under transparent conditions. Detailed due diligence to identify incentives for existing operators to willingly participate in the proposed infrastructure is contemplated under APL 1-B of the project. Initial TA provided for Guinea already outlined a process for the discussion with ACE.
Implementing Agency Risks
MI The proposed arrangements (PPP, use of SPV) and the technical complexity of the project is new to all implementing agencies involved in this operation. Their respective low capacity may affect the implementation at the beginning of the project. The Financial Management staff is not yet in place and there is not a FM manual and an accounting software
Extensive preparation work and due diligence has been carried out by the Task Team and the client to ensure ownership and identification of potential implementation issues. The PPA will finance TA activities aiming at enhancing the implementing agencies’ capacity to mitigate risks of slow start and missing the ACE’s tight disbursement deadlines. A stand alone PIU will be established. FM action plan was agreed and will be implemented during the project including development of FM manual, acquisition of FM software and hiring of an FM specialist and an accountant.
39
Risk Category
Risk
Rating
Risk Description Proposed Mitigation Measures
Project Risks
Design
MI Non conformance with linkage conditionality (cross-effectiveness conditions and cross-suspension remedies) for regional cooperation Risk of delays could result in penalty to clients for missing ACE payment milestone Project commercially not viable due to insufficient demand for services. Design of the project is complex and risky (Public Private Partnership). This Program phase (APL 1-B) also involves Burkina Faso and the Gambia each of which have very different challenges. Some implementation delays/issues in any of these two countries could affect the overall execution of the entire Program.
Program structured so that if the Financing Agreement for any of the other two countries never enters into effect or if disbursements there under are suspended, this would only reduce the scope but not affect the overall implementation of the independent Gambia activities. The CMA provides for installment payments; The Gambia Government has already provided the first 3 and concessional financing will be arranged to cover the balance. Early results of traffic assessment confirm viability. Detailed traffic study will be conducted and Demand stimulating approaches will be explored to address potential risk Support to PPP arrangement from PPA. For all other project components, he project is not relatively complex. The components are dedicated to well-specified structures which will designate a focal point.
Social and Environmental
ML Possible environmental and social impacts including possible impacts on critical habitats and/or physical cultural resources. The institutional responsibilities for preparing the various safeguards instruments would lie with the PIU and GUILAB. Given the need to ensure compliance with safeguards instrument preparation there will be the need for capacity building.
Results of the ESSAF show that the project has limited environmental impact. An ESMP will be developed during implementation. Initial assessment also shows that a RAP or ARAP may not be needed. Finally, since the Program will involve PPP schemes, appropriate technical clauses will be prepared and included in the biddings/binding documents for the Private Entity when necessary, to ensure the execution of agreed environmental and social safeguards measures and implementation of the recommendations in the instruments.
Program and Donor
MI Potential difficulties securing funding for the national backbone .
Islamic Development Bank funding is a parallel financing for
national connectivity. While it has potential to hamper the
realization of the full benefits of international connectivity
nationally if it does not materialize, this failure would have no
effect on the implementation of the international connectivity
component for the project nor on the achievement on the
project‟s PDO.
Delivery Quality ML Key data collections and sharing, particularly from operators, may be difficult as the market is highly competitive.
Training and TA will be made available for monitoring and evaluation. The system will be designed in such a way as not to
affect the operators‟ competitiveness
40
Overall Risk Rating at Preparation Overall Risk Rating During
Implementation Comments
MI
MI
Major issues and risks will be dealt with by effectiveness through targeted activities financed by the PPA. The MI rating for implementation is mainly due to the risky country and institutional contexts, outside the project scope.
41
Annex 5: Financial Management and Disbursement Arrangements
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
Introduction
1. The objective of the Financial Management Assessment is to determine whether the
implementing unit of WARCIP- Guinea, under the oversight of the Ministry of Post and
Telecommunications, has adequate financial management arrangements in place to take on the
project‟s fiduciary responsibility. These arrangements include accounting system and reporting,
auditing, and internal controls. The financial management arrangements of the implementing unit
are adequate if it : (i) is capable of recording accurately all transactions and activities; (ii)
supports the preparation of regular and reliable financial statements; (iii) safeguards its assets,
and (iv) is subjected to a satisfactory auditing process. The assessment complied with the
Financial Management Manual for World Bank-Financed Investment Operations that became
effective on March 1, 2010. It is worth noting that financial management and disbursement of the
PPA under WARCIP Guinea is being handled by the “Education Pour Tous” PIU. The existent
arrangements for the PPA are adequate and fulfill OP 10.02 requirements.
2. Payments will be made directly by the Project to ACE under direct disbursement. To
avoid missing ACE payment milestones, the setting up of a fully functional financial
computerized system will be a disbursement condition instead of an effectiveness condition.
Otherwise as a financial computerized system is not critical for direct payments (it is expected 3
or 4 directs payments to ACE), disbursements for component 1.a - Financing Participation in
ACE – will not be conditioned. But disbursements under others components 1.b, 2 and 3 will be
conditioned by a fully financial computerized system.
3. Retroactive financing is also included under this project. In order to meet the ACE
payment schedule, the Government of Guinea covered one payment of US$ 3.5 million.
Following project effectiveness, this payment will be reimbursed under retroactive financing.
The Government is negotiating with ACE to defer all other payments until effectiveness. In case
effectiveness is delayed, the Government will cover another payment to ACE. In this case, such
additional payment will also be reimbursed under retroactive financing. The total foreseen
amount of retroactive financing is US$ 7.5 million.
Funds flow and disbursement arrangements
Disbursement methods
3. Disbursements under the Grant would be transaction based. Direct Payment and SOE
(Statement of Expenditures) methods will apply as appropriate. The conversion to report-based
disbursements may be envisaged when the PIU has capacity to produce acceptable IFRs. IDA
will authorize an advance to the designated account of the PIU. Funds will be used for eligible
expenditures. The minimum value of Direct Payment and Special Commitment will be 20 % of
the designated account ceiling.
42
4. The project will submit on a monthly basis a Bank statement and a reconciliation of the
designated account, together with the withdrawal applications. All supporting documentation for
SOEs will be archived at the PIU and made available for periodic review by Bank‟ missions and
external auditors.
Designated Account
5. A designated account will be opened at a reputable commercial bank acceptable to the
Bank, in US Dollars and the allocation will cover approximately four months of expenditures.
The Designated Account will be managed according to the disbursement procedures described in
the Administrative, Accounting and Financial Procedures Manual and Disbursement Letter.
Withdrawal of Proceeds
Table 5.1: withdrawal of proceeds
Category
Amount of the
Grant Allocated
(expressed in US $
Percentage of
Expenditures to be
Financed
(inclusive of Taxes)
(1) Consortium Fee under Part
1.1 of the Project
20,700,000 100%
(2) Goods, works, services
(consultants‟ and non-
consulting), training and
workshops under the Project,
and Operational Costs
7,800,000 100%
(3) Refund of Preparation
Advance No. Q762-GUI
5,000 Amount payable
pursuant to Section
2.07 of the General
Conditions
(4) Unallocated 500,000
TOTAL AMOUNT 34,000,000
Since 2008, in application of the Country Financing Parameters for Guinea, all expenditures will
be financed at 100 percent.
43
Budgeting arrangements
7. The budgeting process will be clearly defined in the FM Procedures Manual and will be
adopted by Ministry of Post and Telecommunication or a designated representative before the
beginning of the year. Each Focal Point and the Project Coordinator will prepare budget relate to
their respective component. The project consolidated budget will be submitted to the IDA‟s
objection.
Accounting policies and procedures
8. Project accounts will be maintained on a cash basis, supported with appropriate records
and procedures to track commitments, expenditures and safeguard assets. Annual financial
statements will be prepared by the PIU in accordance with Accounting Standards in force in
Guinea.
Internal control
9. The FM manual, with a clear description of the approval and authorization processes in
respect of segregation of duties and rules, will be adopted. The Bank will pay attention to the
adequacy of internal control during supervision mission.
Reporting and Monitoring
10. The PIU would prepare an Interim Un-audited Financial Reports (IFRs) on a quarterly
basis and submit them to the Bank within 45 days following the end of the quarter. The IFR will
include i) sources and uses of funds by project expenditures classification, ii) a comparison of
budgeted and actual project expenditures (commitment and disbursement) to date and for the
quarter.
The PIU will produce Annual Financial Statements 11
comprising:
a Statement of Sources and Uses of Funds,
a Statement of Uses of funds by category,
Accounting Policies Adopted and Explanatory Notes,
a Management Assertion that project funds have been expensed for the intended
purposes as specified in the relevant financing agreements
Audit arrangements
External audit
11. The Financing Agreement will require the submission of Audited Financial Statements
for the PIU to IDA within six months after the end of the fiscal year. External auditor with
11
It should be noted that the project financial statements should be all inclusive and cover all sources and uses of funds and not only those provided through IDA funding. It thus reflects all program activities, financing, and expenditures, including funds from other development partners.
44
qualification and experience satisfactory to the World Bank will be appointed to conduct an
annual audit of the project‟s financial statements. A single opinion on the Project‟s Financial
Statements in compliance with International Standards on Auditing (ISA) will be required.
12. The external auditors will also prepare a Management Letter containing observations and
comments, and providing recommendations for improvements in accounting records, systems,
controls and compliance with financial covenants in the Financial Agreement.
The table below summarizes the auditing requirements:
Table 5.2: Auditing requirement dates
Audit report Due Date
single opinion on Project Financial Statements
and Management letter
June 30
Financial Management Action Plan
Table 5.3: Financial Management Action Plan
ACTION When By whom
1. Appoint a Financial Management Officer and an
accountant to handle FM and accounting activities:
PIU Draft the ToRs Done by negotiations
Appoint the FM officer By the effectiveness
2. Set up a computerized financial and accounting system By disbursements for
component 1.b, 2 and 3
PIU
3. Prepare and adopt the administrative, financial and
accounting procedures manual in the PIU
By the effectiveness PIU
4. External Audit
PIU Draft the ToR for the financial audit of the Project By the negotiation
Selection of the auditor 4 months after effectiveness
Conclusion of the assessment
13. The conclusion of the assessment is that the current financial management arrangements in
the Ministry do not meet Bank‟s minimum requirements under OP/BP10.02. An action plan has
been indicated above. Implementing the action plan will allow the Ministry to comply with the
Bank‟s minimum requirements. The overall fiduciary risk rating is assessed as Substantial
(Medium Impact).
45
Annex 6: Procurement Arrangements
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
A) General
1. Procurement for the proposed project , except component 1.a would be carried out in
accordance with the World Bank’s “Procurement Guidelines”- “Under IBRD Loans
and IDA Credits” dated January 2011; the “Guidelines: Selection and Employment of
Consultants by World Bank Borrowers” dated January 2011, and the provisions
stipulated in the Legal Agreement. The general description of various items under
different expenditure category is described below. For each contract to be financed by the
Grant, the different procurement methods or consultant selection methods, the need for
prequalification, estimated costs, prior review requirements, and time frame are agreed
between the Recipient and the Bank project team in the Procurement Plan. The
Procurement Plan will be updated at least annually or as required to reflect the actual project
implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.
2. A Country Procurement Assessment Report, carried out in Guinea in February 2002
flagged the main issues such as the lack of capacity regarding the Recipient's staff, the
absence of standard bidding documents at the national level, the insufficient capacity
of local contractors for contracts subject to ICB, and corruption. Recommendations
were made to address these issues. The Bank, through an IDF (TF 55853) signed in
November 2005, provided support on the public procurement reform. The main objectives
are to : i) enhance transparency of the Procurement system, ii) put in place the new
institutional framework (Public Procurement Directorate controlling procurement
transactions, Public Procurement Regulatory Body including an appeal committee for
complaints, iii) an update of the procurement code, iv) design of standard bidding
documents. In March 2009, the legal framework has been revisited and the procurement law
and the new procurement code have been drafted and is expected to be approved by the
government, civil society and private sector by end of May 2011.
3. For National Competitive method (NCB), the borrower may ensure that the following
special requirements are taken into account : ((i) the Recipient shall use standard bidding
documents for the procurement of goods, works and non-consulting services acceptable to
the Association; (ii) in accordance with paragraph 1.16(e) of the Procurement Guidelines,
each bidding document and contract financed from the proceeds of the Grant shall provide
that the bidders, suppliers, and contractors, and their sub-contractors, agents, personnel,
consultants, service providers or suppliers, shall permit the Association to inspect all their
accounts, records and other documents relating to the submission of bids and contract
performance, and to have them audited by auditors appointed by the Association. Acts
intended to materially impede the exercise of the Association's inspection and audit rights
provided for in paragraph 1.16(e) of the Procurement Guidelines constitute an obstructive
practice as defined in paragraph 1.16(a)(v)(bb) of the Procurement Guidelines; and (iii) each
46
bidding document and contract financed from the proceeds of the Grant shall include
provisions on matters pertaining to fraud and corruption as defined in paragraph 1.16(a) of
the Procurement Guidelines and in "Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Fraud and
Corruption in Projects Financed by IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants”, dated
October 15, 2006 and revised in January 2011. The Association will sanction a firm or
individual, at any time, in accordance with prevailing Association's sanctions procedures,
including by publicly declaring such firm or individual ineligible, either indefinitely or for a
stated period of time: (A) to be awarded an Association-financed contract; and (B) to be a
nominated sub-contractor, consultant, supplier or service provider of an otherwise eligible
firm being awarded an Association-financed contract. "
4. Procurement of Works: No high value contract on civil works is expected to be financed
under this project. Nevertheless small civil works for the cable inland connection may be
procured.
5. Procurement of Goods: Goods procured under this project would include and are not
limited to Telecommunication Equipment and accessories, Vehicles, Internet Connectivity,
Office Furniture, Office Equipment (Office Space for WARCIP – PIU).
6. Most of the contracts are of small value and therefore ICB method is not likely to be
used. The procurement will be done using Bank‟s SBD for all ICB if any and for all NCB
subject to any adaptation as required. Small contracts for goods may be procured using the
shopping procedures as per paragraph 3.5 of the Procurement Guidelines.
7. Procurement of non-consulting services: These services may concern operating expenses
such as office maintenance, rent of Office Space for WARCIP PIU, equipment maintenance,
and non-consulting services related to the organization of workshops. The related contracts
will be at small value and they may be procured using the shopping procedures as per
paragraph 3.5 of the Procurement Guidelines.
8. Selection of Consultants: Consulting services will include but are not limited to i) Internet
Exchange Point Study, ii) selection of an Advisor to optimize the governance, ownership
and financing issues related to the operation of the landing station and provision of networks
and services emanating from the ACE Cable, iii) Selection of an Investment Bank to support
implementation of ownership and management of landing station including implementation
of divestiture strategy for Government shareholding, iv) Legal and regulatory due diligence,
safeguards for open access including gateway liberalization, v)privatization support to
SOTELGUI, vi) studies related to broadband regulation, Environmental Studies, vii)
recruitment of PIU‟s key staff, viii) Project‟s operation manual and financial audits.
9. Short lists of consultants for services estimated to cost less than $ 200,000 equivalent per
contract may be composed entirely of national consultants in accordance with the provisions
of paragraph 2.7 of the Consultant Guidelines.
47
10. Operational Costs: these costs may include office furniture, office maintenance, equipment
maintenance and cost related to the project coordination needs; they are either goods or non-
consulting services and they may be procured using the shopping procedures as per
paragraph 3.5 of the Procurement Guidelines. The project operational manual should
describe the procurement process for the related goods or non-consulting services.
48
B. Assessment of the agency’s capacity to implement procurement
11. IDA funding for component 1 (a) on international connectivity does not go towards a
procurable item subject to compliance with World Bank procurement guidelines. This
is because such funding is for membership fees (paid in different installments) against a set
of rights including use of a certain amount of capacity at preferred rates and a share of
ownership of an indivisible cable infrastructure asset.
12. For other project components (1 b, components 2 and 3), IDA procurement guidelines will
apply and Procurement activities will be carried out by the Project Implementation Unit
(PIU) to be created in the Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications and New Information
Technologies (MPTNTI) This PIU will be staffed by a Project Coordinator, a Procurement
Specialist, a Financial Management Specialist. Part time M&E and safeguards specialists will
be also be hired. Meanwhile, the fiduciary function for WARCIP Project Preparation
Advance is entrusted to the Education For All project team. This team comprises a qualified
procurement specialist who has both the technical expertise and the experience necessary to
carry out the procurement activities envisaged under the PPA.
13. An assessment of the capacity of the MPTNTI to implement procurement actions for
the project has been carried out on April 14th, 2011. The assessment reviewed the
organizational structure for implementing the project.
14. Most of the issues/ risks concerning the procurement component for implementation of
the project have been identified and include:
The PIU is not yet created, nor a procurement specialist appointed.
MPTNTI has not implemented a World Bank funded project, and has not past
experience on the World Bank procurement procedures. Therefore the
Ministry‟s Contract Committee members are not familiar with
international procurement procedures, and may obstruct or delay the
procurement process, especially the evaluation of bids and consultants’
proposals;
While the project will concern among others some technical studies for
SOTELGUI, ARPT and other beneficiaries, including the Ministry of
Finance, possible interactions between the PIU and the other actors
(MPTNTI, SOTELGUI, and ARPT) may affect negatively the procurement
process.
The MPTNTI doesn‟t have a Manual of Procedures or a PIM. In addition the
filing system needs to be improved
15. The corrective measures which have been agreed are:
Creation of a PIU within MPTNTI. The procurement function of the PIU will
be performed by a Procurement Specialist with qualification and experience
necessary to carry out the the procurement activities envisaged. This
procurement officer will be responsible for the coordination of all
49
procurement activities, including the following: (i) preparation and updating
of the procurement plan (ii) preparation, finalization and launching of the
Requests for Proposal and bidding documents; (iii) drafting of minutes of
opening of the bids/proposal and preparation of the evaluation reports; (iv)
quality control of procurement documents (TORs, RFP, bidding documents,
evaluation reports, contracts, etc.) before submission to the Bank when prior
review is required; (v) preparing the contracts, and overseeing the payments
to contractors; and (vi) drafting of procurement progress reports.
In addition the Procurement Specialist will be entrusted the role of
procurement capacity building to the technical staff of the project including
all actors of the MPTNTI involved in the project‟s implementation. This
approach would ensure that the technical specialists and experts will have
basic procurement capacity so as to properly handle technical responsibilities
in preparing procurement documents including terms of references and
technical specifications.
PIU will develop a Manual of procedures and will put in place a good filing
system
16. The overall project risk for procurement is substantial.
C. Procurement Plan
17. The Recipient has developed a Procurement Plan for project implementation which
provides the basis for the procurement methods. This plan will be reviewed by the Bank
and it is expected to be approved during appraisal. Once it is approved, the procurement plan
will be made available in the Project‟s database at the office of the Project Implementation
Unit and at the MPTNTI in Conakry and at the Bank‟s external website. The Procurement
Plan will be updated in agreement with the PIU annually or as required to reflect the actual
project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.
D. Frequency of Procurement Supervision
18. In addition to the prior review supervision to be carried out from Bank offices, the capacity
assessment of the MPTNTI has recommended one supervision mission at least every six (6)
months to visit the field to carry out post review of procurement actions.
50
The procurement methods and prior review thresholds are indicated in the Tables below
Table 6.1: For Goods, works and non-consulting services
Procurement
Method
Prior Review
Threshold
Comments
1. ICB (Goods) = or >US$300,000 ICB for goods will be used for US$ 300,000 and above
2. NCB (Goods) The first contract,
irrespective of its cost
estimate
NCB for goods will be used for less than US$ 300,000
3. ICB (Works) = or >US$1,000,000 ICB for works will be used for US$ 1,000,000 and above
4. NCB (Works) The first contract,
irrespective of its cost
estimate
NCB for works will be used for less than US$ 1,000,000
5. ICB (Non-
Consultant
Services), if any
= or >US$ 300,000
All contracts
ICB for non-consultant services will be used for US$300,000
and above
6. NCB (Non-
Consultant
Services)
The first contract,
irrespective of its cost
estimate
NCB for non-consultants services will be used for less than
US$ 300,000
7. Shopping <US$50,000 and the
first contract under
US$50,000
Shopping for works, goods and non-consultant services will be
used for less than or equivalent to US$50,000. If more than
US$50,000, prior clearance is needed from IDA with relevant
justifications. The cost estimate will not exceed US$100,000.
8. Direct contracting All, irrespective of the
cost estimate
None
Table 6.2: For Consultant Services
Selection Method Prior Review
Threshold Comments
1. Competitive Methods (Firms)
= or
>US$200,000
All contracts
2 Competitive Methods (Firms) <US$200,000
The first contract,
irrespective of cost
estimate will be prior
reviewed
3. Single Source (Firms)
All, irrespective
of the cost
estimate
All contracts
4. Individual Consultants = or >US$
50,000 All contracts
5 Individual Consultants <US$ 50,000 All ToRs
6. Single source for Individual Consultants
All, irrespective
of the cost
estimate
All, irrespective of the
cost estimate
7.
Contracts for specific assignments such as contracts for the
elaboration of manual of the project implementation and the
manual of procedures, contracts for monitoring and evaluation
assignments; contracts for financial assistance assignments;
contracts for financial audit; contracts for technical audit;
contracts for environmental and social issues; contracts for legal
assignments
All, irrespective
of the cost
estimate
Those contracts are not
selection methods; but
due to their sensitivity,
they will be subject to
prior review
51
Details of the Procurement Arrangement
1. List of contract Packages for Goods and non consulting services.
Details of the Procurement Arrangement
List of contract Packages for Goods and non-consulting services. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ref. No.
Contract
(Description)
Estimated
Cost
US$
Procurement
Method
Pre-
qualification
(yes/no)
Domestic
Preferenc
e
(yes/no)
Review
by Bank
(Prior / Post)
Expected
Bid-Opening
Date
Comments
COMPONENT 1: CONNECTIVITY
1 Provision of Local
Area Networks for
Government Connectivity(Tele
communication
Equipment and accessories
$650,000 ICB No No Prior Review March 15
2012
2 IXP equipment $ 150,000 NCB No No First contract-
Prior review
February 15,
2012
3 Equipment pour AGETIC
US$ 250,000 NCB No No Prior review February 20, 2012
COMPONENT 3. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND M & E
1
2 Vehicle US$ 49,000 Shopping No No Post Review October 05, 2011
1 vehicule
3 Internet
Connectivity
US$
30,000
Shopping No No Prior Review July 14 2011
4 Office Furniture US$ 30,000
Shopping No No Post Review July 11, 2011
5 Office
Equipment(PABX
System, Overhead Projector
US$
30,000
Shopping No No Post Review July 15 4
2011
6 Logistics (Laptop(5
Nos.), PC(1No.),USB
Flash Drives, etc
US$
25,000
Shopping No No Post review August 05
2011
PPA
7 Rent(Office Space
for WARCIP – PIU)
US$
30,000 per year
Shopping No No Prior Review June 06,
2011
PPA
8 Acquisition of FM
accounting software
US$
25,000
Shopping No No Post review August 15,
2011
PPA
List of Works
. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ref. No.
Contract
(Description)
Estimated
Cost
US$
Procurement
Method
Prequalificatio
n (yes/no)
Domestic
Preferenc
e
(yes/no)
Review
by Bank
(Prior / Post)
Expected
Bid-Opening
Date
Comments
COMPONENT 3
1 Renovation of
GUILAB office
US$ 400,000 NCB No No Prior Review November
15, 2011
52
Consultancy Assignments with Selection Methods and Time Schedule
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ref. No.
Contract
(Description)
Estimated
Cost
US$
Procurement
Method
Prequalificatio
n (yes/no)
Domestic
Preference
(yes/no)
Review
by Bank
(Prior / Post)
Expected
Proposals
Comments
SUPPORTING CONNECTIVITY
1 Internet Exchange Point Study
US$50,000 CQ No No Prior Review November 25, 2011
2 Study for
Government connectivity
150,000 CQ No No Prior Review December
10, 2011
2. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT FOR IMPROVED CONNECTIVITY
1 SPV creation US$ 275,000 CQ No No Prior Review May 27
2011
PPA
2 Support for the divestiture of
Government shares
in the SPV
US$225,000 CQ No No Prior Review September 15 2011
PPA
3 Legal and regulatory
due diligence,
safeguards for open access
US$350,000 QCBS No No Prior Review September
20 2011
PPA
4 Study on ARPT and
sector taxation to improve effective
regulation ahead of
cable landing and related regulatory
strengthening
support
US$275,000 CQ No No Prior Review May 30,
2011
PPA
5 Strategic plan for Sotelgui
US$ 350,000 QCBS Prior review No No June 15 30, 2011
PPA
6 Study for ARPT to
implement effective broadband
regulation
US $ 450,000 QCBS Prior Review No No December 15
2011
7 Study for ARPT to
strengthen interconnection
regulation
US$ 450,000 QCBS Prior Review No No January 10
15 2012
8 Hiring an advisor to support privatization
of SOTELGUI
US 800,000 QCBS Prior Review No No January 25 2012
9 Study for domain
name framework
US 250,000 QCBS Prior Review No No February 07,
2012
10 Study for Backbone
development
US
1,000,000
QCBS Prior Review No No May 15,
2012
11 Legal and regulatory
framework for cross-border and
national flows of information and data
in broadband
networks
US$
750,000
QCBS Prior No No March 15,
2012
COMPONENT 3. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND M & E
1 PIU Coordinator US$
140,000
IC Prior No No June 15,
2011
PPA
2 PIU Procurement Specialist
US$ 120,000
IC Prior No No July 10, 2011 PPA
3 PIU Financial
Management Specialist
US$
120,000
IC Prior No No June 30,
2011
PPA
4 PIU Accountant US$
480,000
IC Prior No No July 10,
2011
PPA
5 Support Staff (2) US$ 48,000 IC Post No No July 10, PPA
53
2011
Ref. No.
Contract
(Description)
Estimated
Cost
US$
Procurement
Method
Prequalificatio
n (yes/no)
Domestic
Preference
(yes/no)
Review
by Bank
(Prior / Post)
Expected
Proposals
Comments
6 Project Operational Manual and
procedures
US$ 70,000
CQ Post
No No July 10 2011 PPA
7 ESSAF US$
30,000
IC Prior No No May 15,
2011
PPA
8 ESMF and RPF and
additional field
surveys
US$
115,000
CQ Prior No No June 10,
2011
PPA
9 M & E US$ 50,000
IC Prior No No August 10, 2011
PPA
10 Legal advisor for
GUILAB
US$ 100,000 IC Prior No No October 5
2011
11 Communications U$ 75,000
IC Post No No August 10 2011
PPA
IV. Implementing Agency Capacity Building Activities with Time Schedule
No.
Expected outcome /
Activity Description
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Duration
Start Date
Comments
1 Training for regulators(ARPT) 400,00 To be determined Sept 2011
2 Capacity building for PIU Staff 100,000 To be determined October 2011
Training for AGETIC 250,000 To be determined February 2012
3 Training for Ministry staff)
400,000
To be determined October 2011
4 Training for SOTELGUI 200,000 To be determined December
2011
54
Annex 7: Implementation and Monitoring Arrangements
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
Implementation Arrangements
1. The proposed project will be implemented under the aegis of MPTNTI. Implementation
arrangements involve creation of a Project Implementation Unit (PIU) that will be supported by
five Focal Points. The PIU will be headed by a Project Coordinator who will report to the
Minister through the Permanent Secretary.
Figure 7.1: Implementing structure
2. The PIU will be composed of
A project coordinator
A procurement specialist
A financial management specialist
An accountant
Support staff
The process of hiring the project team started under the Project Preparation Facility (PPF). The
team is expected to be in place before effectiveness.
The PIU will also hire part time M&E consultant and part time social and environmental
specialist(s) to strengthen the PIU capacity on both monitoring and evaluation as well as in
implementation of environmental and social safeguards linked with the project.
Minister
MPTNTI
PIU
Focal Point MPTNTI
Focal ARPTFocalPoint
MoFFocal Point SOTELGUI
Focal Point GUILAB
55
3. The PIU will serve as the Grant Administrator of the project and will handle all
administrative matters in accordance with the Project Implementation Manual (PIM). It will also
ensure financial management and handle project disbursements, and include the preparation and
submission of replenishment requests to IDA. The Unit will also be responsible for (i)
maintaining an Management Information System (MIS) for tracking progress in all project
subcomponents, both in terms of financial performance and meeting implementation targets and
monitor the performance of all contractors under the project; (ii) preparing annual work
programs and budgets, and if necessary, reviewing, in consultation with IDA, the reallocation of
resources across the various components of the project as lessons emerge as to patterns of
demand and development impact.
4. The PIU will be assisted by a task team composed of five focal points.
o Focal point recommended by the Minister on issues related to policy matters and
overall coordination of the project;
o Focal point recommended by ARPT on issues related to regulatory component
o Focal point recommended by SOTELGUI on issues related to SOTELGUI
support
o Focal Point recommended by Ministry of Finance for all issues related to fiscal
aspects, Government participation in GUILAB and overall sector reform issues
o Focal Point designated by private sector for issues related to the GUILAB.
5. The focal points will be responsible for initiating activities related to their respective
components, including developing ToR and draft procurement documents, and will be the focal
points for monitoring progress of their components and for collecting and updating indicators for
the components they manage.
Monitoring and Evaluation
6. The PIU will monitor and evaluate national projects. The will bear the primary
responsibility for project monitoring and evaluation (M&E), and, as such, will establish standard
formats and guidelines for data collection and reporting, and will organize training sessions for
project stakeholders in their use.
7. An M&E system will be set up within the PIU to keep track of and evaluate
implementation progress of the proposed IDA project within the broader context of the
institutional framework for the telecommunications sector. Although increased geographical
reach and reduction of costs at the country level remains the hallmark of success of an enabling
environment, the project‟s M&E system will seek first to measure results that are closely
associated with project activities. Ultimately, improvement of laws and decrees by the project
activities (component 2) will have positive ripple effects on the whole sector and on service
delivery.
56
8. The views of direct beneficiaries will be brought into the monitoring and evaluation
process. Comprehensive M&E reporting will be needed to monitor the results and performance
of the project. It will involve mainly the direct beneficiaries of project activities, but will be
extended to other beneficiaries such as telecommunications operators and private ICT firms,
which ultimately are the main beneficiaries of the project‟s outcomes. The PIU will review and
validate the reports on performance indicators and recommend corrective action if necessary.
57
Annex 8: Project Preparation and Appraisal Team Members
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
Table 8.1: Project Preparation and Appraisal
Milestone Forecast Actual
Project Concept Note Review 1/6/2011
PID to Infoshop (PCN Stage) 2/10/2011
ISDS to Infoshop (PCN Stage) 2/10/2011
Decision Meeting 4/28/2011 5/03/2011
Authorization to appraise/negotiate 4/28/2011 5/03/2011
Updated PID to Infoshop 5/2/2011
Updated ISDS to Infoshop 5/2/2011
EA received by Infoshop na
Appraisal 5/2/2011 5/4/2011
Negotiations 5/9/2011 5/9/2011
Board Approval 6/21/2011
(b) Table 8.2: Team Members (Bank Staff and Consultants) who worked on the project: NAME TITLE UNIT
Boutheina Guermazi Sr. Regulatory Specialist ICT Sector Unit
Mavis Ampah Sr. ICT Policy Specialist ICT Sector Unit
Doyle Gallegos Lead ICT Policy Specialist ICT Sector Unit
Laurent Besancon Regional Coordinator/Sr. Regulator Specialist ICT Sector Unit
Michel Rogy Sr. ICT Policy Advisor ICT Sector Unit
Duncan Wambogo Omole Information Analyst ICT Sector Unit
Marc Lixi Sr. Operations Officer ICT Sector Unit
Sarah Brierly STC ICT Sector Unit
Michele Ralisoa Noro Sr. Program Assistant ICT Sector Unit
Kymberly A. Thompson Temporary ICT Sector Unit
Deo Ndikumana Sr. Operations Officer AFCRI
Claudia Pardiñas Ocaña Sr. Counsel LEGAF
Wolfgang Chadab Sr. Finance Officer CTRFC
Emmanuel Fiadzo Sr. Economist Guinea AFTP4
David Satola Sr. Counsel LEGPS
Bienvenu Rajaonson Sr. Environmental Specialist AFTEN
Lucienne M‟Baipor Sr. Social Development Specialist AFTCS
Enagnon Earnest Eric Adda ET Consultant ( financial Management) AFTFM
Sidy Diop Procurement Specialist AFTPC
Racky Dia Camara Program Assistant AFMGN
Thierno Hamidou Diallo Disbursement Assistant AFMGN
58
Implementation Support Plan
1. The Bank team members will be based either in Washington DC or in the Africa region, and
will be available to provide timely, efficient and effective implementation support to the
client. Formal supervision and field visits will be carried out semi-annually initially, with
possibility for annual visits in later years of the project. Detailed inputs from the Bank team
are outlined below:
Technical inputs. Technical telecommunications and regulatory related inputs are
required to review bid documents to ensure fair competition through proper technical
specifications and fair assessment of the technical aspects of bids. ICT Policy Specialists
and regulatory specialists will provide technical support and conduct supervision visits
whenever needed.
Fiduciary requirements and inputs. Training will be provided by the Bank‟s financial
management specialist and procurement specialist before the commencement of project
implementation as needed. The team will also help identify capacity building needs to
strengthen its financial management capacity and to improve procurement management
efficiency. Both the financial management and the procurement specialist will be based
in the region to provide timely support. Formal supervision of financial management will
be carried out semi-annually or annually, while procurement supervision will be carried
out on a timely basis as required by the client.
Safeguards. Inputs from an environment specialist and a social specialist may be
required, though the project‟s social and environmental impacts are limited and client
capacity is generally adequate. No field visits are likely to be required, but this will be
confirmed - the social and environmental specialists will be available on a need basis.
Operation. The Task Team will also provide day to day supervision of all operational
aspects, as well as coordination with the client and among Bank team members. If
needed, a consultant may be used to support this role.
The main focus of implementation support is summarized below.
Table 8.3: Implementation support
Time Focus Resource Estimate in Staff-Week(s) Partner
Role Project
duration
Team leadership, technical and procurement review of
the bidding documents and Institutional arrangement
and project supervision coordination
ICT Policy Specialist 15
SWs
NA
Procurement training Procurement specialist(s) 2 SWs NA
FM training and supervision FM specialist 2 SWs NA
Environmental and Social Issues
Social and environmental specialists
1SWs
NA
59
Staff skill mix required is summarized below.
`Table 8.4: Staff skills mix Skills Needed Number of Staff Weeks Number of Trips Comments
Task team leader 15 SWs annually Fields trips as required. DC based
Procurement 2 SWs annually Fields trips as required. Country office based
Social specialist 0.5 SWs annually Fields trips as required. Country office based
Environment specialist 0.5 SWs annually Fields trips as required. Country office based
Financial management
specialist
2 SWs annually Fields trips as required. Country office based
Legal support 1 SW Fields trips as required DC based
60
Annex 9: Environmental and Social Safeguards Framework
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
1. As permitted under OP/BP 8.00 (Rapid Response to Crises and Emergencies), an
Environmental and Social Screening Assessment Framework (ESSAF) has been developed
for this project. The ESSAF describes the approach and principles to be followed to ensure
due diligence in managing potential adverse environmental and social impacts and risks
associated with the project. More specifically, the ESSAF addresses the following issues:
(i) minimization of environmental degradation; (ii) protection of human health; (iii)
prevention or compensation of any loss of livelihood; and, (iv) enhancement of positive
environmental and social outcomes.
2. The Infrastructure Component of the project includes connections to the ACE submarine
cable, an approximately 17,000 km submarine cable system which is expected to connect
South Africa to Europe, potentially connecting up to 23 countries.
3. The ACE submarine cable is configured into 4 segments as follows:
Segment 1: Between the Penmarch (France) and the Dakar (Senegal) Terminal Stations
Segment 2: Between the Dakar (Senegal) and the Abidjan (Cote D‟Ivoire) Terminal
Stations
Segment 3: Between the Abidjan (Cote D‟Ivoire) and the Santana (Sao Tome) Terminal
Stations, and
Segment 4: Between the Santana (Sao Tome) and the Cape Town (South Africa)
Terminal Stations (however the contract for this segment is not effective yet).
4. The physical cable system will comprise two fiber pairs that provide two separate bi-
directional paths (i.e., one fiber in each pair carries signals in the outbound direction and
the other fiber in the return or inbound direction). The cable system is likely to have a
submerged or „wet plant‟ part, and a „dry plant‟ part which interfaces at proposed Landing
Stations.
Compliance with Safeguards Policies
5. A preliminary safeguard assessment has been undertaken which concludes that the
environmental and social impacts are minimal. The project is set out in OP/BP 8.00 for
emergency project and classified as Category B. Specifically, the cable route will cross deep
sea as well shores and be connected with landing station and this position will have
environmental and social implications. For that, the project triggers: OP 4.01 (Environmental
Assessment), OP 4.04 (Natural Habitats), and OP 4.11 (Physical Cultural Resources), and
Involuntary Resettlement.
61
6. Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01), Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04), and
Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11). The project is expected to have minimal
environmental and social impacts. The section below explains in more detail the risks of
laying the fiber cable in the deep sea and coastal waters and onto the shore. The site
selected for cable landing or Terminal Station approximately 700 meters from the Beach
Man hole (BMH) at the beach. The land currently has no permanent structures. The landing
station is expected to take about 45m x 25m land space with approximately half of this
space for equipment and the balance for maintenance, training, and office spaces. The
project will not cause any permanent or temporary structure to be demolished. It will only
create temporary inconveniences during the construction phase and limited economic
disadvantages to business concerns. The fiber cable may be laid near or in fragile and
sensitive areas in the coastal sea and/or on land; it may also be laid close to or at cultural
areas/sites. The ESSAF thus includes an assessment of potential impacts on sensitive
habitats and cultural areas/sites, with guidance on mitigating such impacts. The project will
(i) minimize environmental degradation; (ii) protect natural resources; (iii) prevent or
compensate any loss of livelihood; and, (iv) enhance positive environmental and social
outcomes. Appropriate environmental and social mitigation assessment (ESIA) and
measures (ESMP) will be developed.
7. Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12). The project also triggers OP 4.12 (Involuntary
Resettlement), as safety in vessels circulation, fishermen activities and land acquisition for
landing station and network distribution may occur during project implementation. The
potential social impacts of components under the proposed project will be site-specific. In the
event that people are physically or economically displaced because of the Project‟s activities,
the Bank will, in applicable circumstances, require a draft Resettlement Action Plan,
prepared in accordance with the requirements of OP 4.12, before the commencement of the
any relocation activities.
8. Preliminary assessment shows minimal social impact, if any. The project will not cause any
permanent or temporary structure to be demolished. It will only create temporary
inconveniences during the construction phase and limited economic disadvantages to
business concerns. There is no land acquisition issue as the site for the Landing Station is
on vacant state property which has been allocated to the project for the purpose.
9. The proposed project is expected to have positive social benefits. The main social impacts
of the proposed project are the increased possibility of better access to ICT services for the
population and improved GoG service delivery. The project will contribute to (i) enabling
ICT to become a driver for sustainable economic growth; (ii) enabling the GoG to use ICT
to improve services; (iii) improving access and quality of ICT services for the general
population, businesses, and the GoG; and (iv)reducing isolation and enhancing economic
activities in rural areas.
62
Safeguard issues on Deep Sea 12
Activities
9. In principle, deep ocean fiber optic cables are no larger than 17-21 mm diameter – about
the size of a domestic garden hose- and are laid mainly upon the surface of the ocean floor
(“surface laid”). Sections of the cable (including both wet and dry plants) lie within the
territorial waters of the landing parties while remaining sections lie in international waters.
According to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), of
which Guinea is a signatory, international waters start 12 nautical miles from the coast.
Beyond the 12 nautical mile limit there is a further 12 or 24 nautical miles from the
territorial sea, a contiguous zone, in which a state could continue to enforce laws in four
specific areas: pollution, taxation, customs and immigration (see figure 1, below).
UNCLOS further provides for economic zones which could extend from the edge of the
territorial sea out to 200 nautical miles. In the exclusive economic zones, states have no
sovereign rights but can enforce laws on pollution, taxation, customs and immigration (see
figure below). Within their territorial waters, on the other hand, countries have sovereign
rights. Foreign nations have the freedom of laying submarine pipes and cables in the
exclusive economic zones. The seaward limit of coverage for the ESMP (to be prepared
during project implementation) in Guinea is the seaward limit of the EEZ, defined as
extending 200 nm (370 km) from the shorelines.
12
Deep Sea is mainly a technical term with no precise definition used to describe zone/areas beyond which cable
burial is not required (mainly because threats to the cable from trawling activities are non-existent. This starts
usually after 1000/ 1500 meters depth. Given this challenge, perhaps Bank environment focus should be on
territorial vs international waters, though it is acknowledged that maritime jurisdictional zones are not defined by
reference to water depth or marine ecology
63
Figure 9.1: Designated ocean zones according to UNCLOS.
Segment 1 countries – Already completed, results available
Segment 2 countries – Mid-October, results available Mid-November
Segment 3 countries – Early December, results available Mid-December
Segment 4 countries – TBC subject to availability of funding
10. In general, however, the section of the cable that lies in the deep sea has minimal impact on
marine mammals and fish. The threat of whale entanglements has diminished significantly
with improvements since 1956 in the design of cable and in the precision with which they
can be laid in close conformity with the seabed profile, and without loops and twists.
11. Generally speaking, there are no significant environmental issues concerning fiber cables in
the deep sea (significant issues are concentrated on shallow waters and the coastal
areas/beach). The extensive studies that take place prior to final cable laying tend to work
as effective safeguards against any possible environmental disruption, since in large part
they are intended to identify routes for the cable that will avoid seamounts, volcanoes,
canyons, vents, seeps, deepwater reefs, dissected terrain – all areas that tend to be
associated with higher biological value than the general abyssal plain.
64
12. Because much of the deep ocean lie beyond national jurisdictions, few ESIAs for any
marine activities have been undertaken in this zone and thus there is little evidence of any
environmental issues, except in cases of oil and gas exploration and very deep sea trawling.
No specific environmental studies are undertaken for submarine cables; rather the detailed
Cable Route Survey effectively serves this purpose. At the surface, pollution of the high
seas by oil and wastes discharged from vessels can be effectively controlled if those vessels
observe compliance with maritime conventions.
Safeguard issues for Shallow Water Activities
13. As the cable gets closer to the shores in water depths shallower than 1,500m, the cable‟s
diameter may increase to about 40-50 mm due to the need to add protective wire armoring.
It may also be necessary to bury the cable to protect it.
14. It is possible, depending on the topology of the country that the 12 nautical miles of
territorial waters will straddle between shallow waters and deep sea. It is also likely that
there may be fishing and other maritime activities, particularly in the shallow waters which
could be disturbed during the route survey and cable laying process (but this is short-lived
as the duration of cable-laying operations is usually no more than a few days).
15. In accordance with OP. 8.00, the Government of Guinea has developed an Environmental
and Social Screening and Assessment Framework (ESSAF). The ESSAF provides guidance
on the approach to be taken during implementation of the operation and the planning of
mitigation measures, including consultation and disclosure requirements, to ensure due
diligence and facilitate consistent treatment of environmental and social issues.
Safeguard Screening and Mitigation
16. This ESSAF has been developed specifically for this proposed project to ensure due
diligence to avoid causing harm or exacerbating social tension and to ensure consistent
treatment of social and environmental issues by the Contractor and the Government of
Guinea. The purpose of this Framework is also to assist the Ministry and all concerned
sectors in screening all the activities for their likely social and environmental impacts,
identifying documentation and preparation requirements and piloting the investments.
Preliminary survey results, detailed marine cable route and information on the geology,
environment and oceanography of the landing area have to be made available to facilitate
the monitoring and evaluation of implemented activities. In addition this would help to
establish the guidelines for land acquisition and eventual compensation, codes of practice
for the prevention and mitigation of potential environmental impacts and safeguards
procedures for inclusion in the Technical Specifications of Contracts.
Responsibilities for Safeguard Screening and Mitigation
17. A number of Ministries and institutions are involved for the proposed project including
that of Transport, telecommunication, fishing, Port Authority, Guinean Navy, environment.
Each mentioned entity will be responsible for applying the safeguard screening and
mitigation requirements to its own tasks under the coordination of the Ministry of
65
Environment. Within each entity, a Safeguard Focal Point (SFP) might be identified to
facilitate the overseeing of the implementation of the Framework.
Capacity building and Monitoring of safeguard Framework Implementation
18. The Recipient has limited capacity for safeguards management. So, to ensure compliance –
from preparation to review to implementation – of safeguards instruments with Bank
policies, there will be the need for capacity building. As part of the capacity building
components of the project, the Safeguards Focal Point, service providers and relevant staff
of the concerned Ministries will also receive training in the ESSAF‟s application. To assist
in this capacity building and to provide subsequent guidance and review of the ESSAF‟s
application the World Bank and subsequently the Government of Guinea will contract
specialist services for environment and social matters to carry out the ESMP and RAP
studies. During supervision of these activities, the World Bank will assess the
implementation of the ESSAF, and the ESMP and RAP later on, and recommend additional
strengthening if required. Information sharing to the public will be part of the capacity
building plan, as the project is considered as public goods and thus will be conducted more
inclusively through various media sources.
Consultation and Disclosure
19. The Ministry will consult project affected group and local nongovernmental organizations
on the project‟s environmental and social aspects, and will take their views into account.
The Ministry will initiate these consultations as early as possible, and for meaningful
consultations, will provide relevant material in a timely manner prior to consultation, in a
form and language (s) that are understandable and accessible to the group being consulted.
The Ministry will provide these groups, when studies are completed, with a summary of the
EIA report‟s conclusions. In addition, the Ministry will make the draft reports publicly
available to project-affected groups, local nongovernmental organizations and countries
related to ACE network.
20. The elaboration and implementation of the ESSAF will require adequate participation of
relevant stakeholders in undertaking environmental and social assessments, and in
developing and implementing mitigation plans. The Ministry will make all reasonable
efforts to consult with relevant the affected entities, corporate, communities, and NGOs to
incorporate needs, and to resolve eventual conflicts.
21. Once completed, this ESSAF will be shared with concerned sectors, nongovernmental
organizations, development partners of Guinea and concerned corporate and communities.
It will be disclosed in Guinea in French and local language by the Ministry of Environment
and Communication and it will also be made available at the World Bank‟s Info shop.
Relevant activities and specific safeguard documents/mitigation plans prepared
subsequently will also be disclosed.
66
Implementation support
22. Regular review should be specified to assess progress on environment and social
safeguards, achievement of overall objectives, as well as the role of the different partners.
Guidelines on the type of information wanted and the presentation of feedback information
should also be highlighted.
23. During project implementation, Guinea will prepare an ESIA/ESMP (consistent with
national laws, any applicable treaty concerning international waters, and OP 4.01) and a
Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the lateral cables and any associated equipment that
will be laid from the junction with the main cable through territorial waters and onto the
national shores, and also for the fiber on transmission lines, as required. The seaward limit
of coverage for the ESMP is the seaward limit of each country‟s EEZ, defined as extending
200 nm (370 km) from the shorelines. The RAP will be prepared in case the project may
require land acquisition and resettlement, and/or restricted access to natural resources,
although this is not expected based on the preliminary Cable Route Survey work. Key
stakeholders for consultation will include current inhabitants (where applicable) of landing
sites, the Environmental Protection Agency Guinea, businesses and civil society.
67
Annex 10: Economic and Financial Analysis
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
1. Connecting to ACE minimizes transit cost and is most cost-effective long-term option.
Financial analysis was performed for Guinea. The analysis examined a variety of satellite and
optic fiber options and finds that a submarine fiber link with local landing station is the best
overall option in terms of long-term cost effectiveness and bandwidth availability. More
specifically, considering the limited number of fiber alternatives and their higher cost, the
ACE project is the best fiber option for Guinea. The ACE cable has the potential to
substantially address by 2013 the urgent need for high capacity access to the international
backbones at substantially lower cost than currently available in Guinea via its existing
satellite links. Although up-front costs are higher, the key cost saving with ACE compared to
alternative options is the high cost involved in the purchasing of capacity to the global
backbones, either via satellite or from an existing landing station in another country. The cost
of capacity on existing African cables linking to Europe (e.g. MainOne or SAT-3) is between
US$280 and US$800/Mbit/s/month, and averages $500/Mbit/s/month. On satellite capacity
costs are at least $2000/month. By participating in ACE, which lands traffic directly in
Europe, transit costs to the global backbones are minimized. ACE also has an advantage over
a cross-border fiber option in terms of speed and costs, and is without the need for
independent management, planning and maintenance13
. The ACE cable design is both “state
of the art” and proven, and involves no significant technology risk. The choice of electronics
is conservative and has reasonable efficiencies carrying Internet Protocol (IP) traffic. High
capacity international connectivity will mitigate the existing technological marginalization of
Guineans and bridge the digital divide by expediting broadband rollout, e-Government and e-
Services, new media and ICT development in urban and rural Guinea, for the benefit of
ordinary Guineans14
. Specific steps would need to be taken, however, in particular to
establish a clear regulatory regime for the landing point, in order to ensure that Guinea fully
benefits from the potential connectivity that the cable offers.
2. Fiber cable has an advantage over satellite in terms of price and quality of service. The
fiber option has the advantage of high speed and quality, and low cost. There is a single point
of purchase and low local management overhead. In the ACE case, the Consortium is already
in place. The disadvantage of fiber connection in the ACE solution is the high capital
expenditure. However, this solution in the long term offers the lowest prices.
13 Although the Senegal based operator, Sonatel, has indicated that it will build a cross-border terrestrial fiber
link to its subsidiary, Orange Guinea, this is not likely to provide as cost-effective solution as ACE, because it will
be under the control of a single operator, and will still require high transit fees to exit from Africa via SAT-3 or ACE
in Dakar. Thus, while obtaining upstream bandwidth from an existing cable could reduce the initial investment
costs, similarly to use of satellite, this option also does not scale cost-effectively.
14 The remaining constraints being low income level and low literacy/education levels.
68
3. Assumptions of financial analysis. Financial comparisons of satellite versus fiber options
were done using the following assumptions:
Study period: 10 years
Capital costs for ACE: US$ 25m
Initial capacity of ACE: 5.9 Gbps, using an average of 2.5Gbps over the study period
Annual operating and maintenance costs: 3% of CAPEX
Average geostationary satellite transponder costs: $2000 per month per Mbit/s
Cost for capacity on existing cables: MainOne and SAT-3: $280-800 per month per
Mbit/s
4. Connecting to ACE will see Guinea breakeven between 2014 and 2015 with an NPV to
2025 of US $24.8 million. The IRR is 22.4% assuming an average bandwidth sale price of
$100/Mbit/s/month, and an IRR of 14.3%, assuming $50/Mbit/s/month. The latter figure is
likely to be more competitive and would stimulate more use, and takes into account
bandwidth pricing trends in other regions such as East Africa. The final breakeven year will
depend on actual capacity uptake and the wholesale price of bandwidth. After 2024 at the
latest, the project would be cash-flow positive and substantial revenues would be made if
these wholesale pricing levels are maintained. Investment data was calculated based on a
discount rate of 15%. On this basis, membership in ACE, if accompanied by robust
regulation to ensure competitive pricing releases demand and stimulates national backbone
development, has potential to provide low cost international access to a broad range of the
population in Guinea.
5. Previous experience with fiber cables shows a rapid increase in demand when price of
bandwidth decreases. The effect that lowering the cost of access has on the amount of
bandwidth sold can be modeled using a price elasticity curve. The SAT-3 example (SAT-3 is
between Portugal and South Africa) shows a clear relationship between volume and tariffs, if
the cost on SAT-3 were dropped to US$250 per month. The chart below compares the price
of access on SAT-3 (per E1 half-circuit to Sessimbra, Portugal) against the volume of
international bandwidth sold. This shows the effect that price decreases between 2004 and
2006 have had on the volume of bandwidth sold in each of four countries where comparable
data was available. The increase in international bandwidth demand increases because
broadband services first become more viable for operators to deploy, and secondly because
as retail prices decrease the service become increasingly affordable and penetration increases.
Réunion is included here as a particularly clear case which shows that when price was
US$20,466 per Mb the volume was just 4 Mbit/s, but when it decreased to US$1,967 volume
increased to 180 Mbit/s. If the price were to drop further to US$500 per Mb, it is projected
that the volume would increase to 1.656 Gbps. If the price were to decrease to US$250 per
Mbit/s per month, the volume is projected to grow to 5.02 Gbps. This increase comes about
because of the multiplier effects: monthly prices for broadband decrease, in turn improving
affordability and increasing uptake of services.
69
Figure 10.1: Bandwidth Price Elasticity
6. The predicted bandwidth demand for Guinea with fiber access is over 17,000 Mbit/s
compared to 900 with inclined orbit satellite. In this analysis it is assumed that there is no
effective limit on the amount of satellite bandwidth that can be purchased. This is unlikely
given that many countries in the region will be switching from satellite to fiber with the
launch of ACE and other cables, and satellites with West African footprints continue to be
launched. Extrapolating current usage and growth in users could provide an indication of
future bandwidth demand, however due to the current high cost of service (relative to income
levels) and the relatively slow speeds available, this would tend to substantially
underestimate pent-up demand when bandwidth availability improves and costs decrease.
Given the trends worldwide in broadband adoption levels, and especially encouraged by the
explosion of mobile broadband15
(3G), the estimates used appear relatively conservative,
especially toward the end of the analysis period (2021), by which date it is expected that
almost every mobile phone user would have access to broadband on their handset. However,
this is dependent on the introduction of high-bit-rate mobile services into the market, and
unless increased competition is introduced into the sector, the operators may not be
encouraged to introduce these types of new services.
7. Bandwidth requirement per user has the potential to advance rapidly with further
social and economic development, especially with the development of tourism and
BPO16
sector. There can be a wide divergence in forecasting bandwidth requirements per
user. The last 10 years has seen massive increases in end-user bandwidth demand resulting
from the popularity of social network, image and video sites such as FaceBook and
YouTube. Fortunately these bandwidth demands have kept pace with technology
15 3G data service uptake from the consumer has been massive and unprecedented in other developing
countries such as Kenya.
16 Business Process Outsourcing.
Price Elasticity On Sat-3
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
- 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Volume (Mbps)
Pri
ce (
US
$ p
er
mo
nth
)Ghana Nigeria
Reunion South Africa
Nigeria PE South Africa PE
Ghana PE Reunion PE
70
developments which are now seeing domestic broadband services delivering 100Mbit/s and
even 1Gbps in some advanced countries. If we assume that Guinea will have the opportunity
catch up at least partially with these developments over the next decade then we can expect a
relatively high level of growth in bandwidth use. There are also some special sources of
additional demand which could also significantly increase international transmission
requirement: Tourism and development of Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) sector.
Although tourism is comparatively small in Guinea, it could increase significantly in future.
Tourism creates demand for international telecommunication services through demand of
administrative and marketing service as well as demand for internet access, international
calls and money transactions. BPO and Internet call centre service companies can generate
significantly more Internet traffic if bandwidth prices can be reduced and fiber connections
made available17
. Mining operations and export-led businesses in the agricultural sector also
require a correspondingly large amount of bandwidth. Sourcing channels for television
rebroadcasting is currently carried out by satellite but could be substituted by fiber if
bandwidth prices are sufficiently competitive.
8. Fast internet has been shown to boost the productivity of firms as well as generate
employment opportunities. New growth theory suggests that long-run economic growth
emanates from spillover arising from innovation and investment in new technologies. Fast
internet access can be considered one important new technology, and broadband is
increasingly recognized to promote productivity and boost aggregate economic growth
(OECD, 2003). Analytical studies have shown that firms using standard broadband (defined
as connection speeds above 256 Kbps (OECD, 2002)) were on average 10 percent more
productive than firms using dial-up internet access. Faster internet speeds are also causally
related to increased employment opportunities with analysis showing that for every one
percentage point increase in broadband penetration within a region, employment increases by
0.2-0.3 percent per year for the private, non-farm economy (Crandall et al, 2007). Indeed,
studies show a clear positive relationship between employment and broadband penetration in
the manufacturing and service industries, with business growth shown to be particularly
significant for larger businesses and for IT intensive sector (Lehr et al, 2006). The results of
these studies support the hypothesis that broadband penetration enhances economic activity.
Increased broadband speeds and less expensive data access have the potential to promote
economic activities in West Africa, supporting the growth and productivity of businesses and
gradual transfer of employment from agricultural to service industries and expansion of the
region‟s nascent ICT and Business Process Outsourcing sector.
17 The almost 1-second delays introduced by satellite connectivity significantly reduces performance of
international services and limits the types of services that can be provided, especially among high bandwidth
consuming interactive services such as BPO (Business Process Outsourcing) call centres and VPN (Virtual Private
Networks) networks.
71
ANNEX 11: DOCUMENTS IN PROJECT FILES
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
1. National Backbone Study December 2009
2. Virtual PCN Review Meeting Package December 20, 2010
3. Cleared Minutes of PCN Review Meeting February 4, 2011
4. Revised Project Concept Note January 28, 2011
5. Project Information Document – PCN Stage January 2011
6. Integrated Safeguards Data Sheet February 8, 2011
7. Letter from Government of Guinea requesting WB support March 8, 2011
(ACE Participation)
8. World Bank response to GoG Request March 31, 2011
9. ACE Construction and Maintenance Agreement June 05, 2010
72
ANNEX 12: STATEMENT OF LOANS AND CREDITS
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
IBRD/IDA/Grants
As of 4/7/2011
Closed Projects 66
IBRD/IDA *
Total Disbursed (Active) 15.56
of which has been repaid 0.00
Total Disbursed (Closed) 208.56
of which has been repaid 172.75
Total Disbursed (Active + Closed) 224.13
of which has been repaid 172.75
Total Undisbursed (Active) 41.56
Total Undisbursed (Closed) 0.00
Total Undisbursed (Active + Closed) 41.56
Active Projects
Project ID Project Name Development
Objectives Implementation
Progress Fiscal Year IBRD IDA GRANT Cancel. Undisb. Orig. Frm Rev'd
P070878 GN-GEF Coastal Marine & Biodiversity Mg MU MU 2006 5 4.38380177 4.16713507
P091297 GN-APL 3 Urban Phase 2 MU MU 2008 15 11.8204942 10.6090014
P065129 GN-APL2 Village Comm Supp Program MU MU 2008 17 13.8768015 11.6129267
P098742 GN-Electricity Sec Eff Improv GEF (FY07) U U 2008 4.5
P081297 GN-GEF CB Land Mgmt SIL (FY06) MS MU 2006 7 6.1833939 5.91672722
P065126 GN-Health Sec Supt SIL (FY05) U U 2005 25 15.8601351 13.9068423
P113608 GN-Labor-Intensive Public Works MS MS 2009 2.5 0.021708 0.021708
P113268 GN: Agric. Productivity Support Project MS MS 2009 5 1.09823613 1.09823613
Overall Result 57 24 53.2445705 47.3325769
Original Amount in US$ Millions Disbursements a/
Difference Between
Expected and Actual
Supervision Rating
Last PSR
73
Statement of IFC Portfolios
FY Approval Company Loan Equity
**Quasi
Equity *GT/RM Participant Loan Equity
**Quasi
Equity *GT/RM Participant
2006/08 Simfer 0 1.27 33.73 0 0 0 1.27 30.74 0 0
Total Portfolio: 0 1.27 33.73 0 0 0 1.27 30.74 0 0
As of 2/28/2011
(In USD Millions)
* Denotes Guarantee and Risk Management Products.
** Quasi Equity includes both loan and equity types.
Committed and Disbursed Outstanding Investment Portfolio
74
ANNEX 13: COUNTRY AT A GLANCE
GUINEA
WARCIP 1B
2/25/11
Sub-
Key D evelo pment Indicato rs Saharan Low
Guinea Africa income
(2009)
Population, mid-year (millions) 10.1 819 828
Surface area (thousand sq. km) 246 24,242 17,838
Population growth (%) 2.4 2.5 2.2
Urban population (% of to tal population) 35 36 28
GNI (Atlas method, US$ billions) 3.8 897 389
GNI per capita (Atlas method, US$) 370 1,095 470
GNI per capita (PPP, international $) 940 1,981 1,131
GDP growth (%) -0.3 5.2 6.2
GDP per capita growth (%) -2.6 2.7 3.9
(mo st recent est imate, 2003–2008)
Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP, %) 70 51 ..
Poverty headcount ratio at $2.00 a day (PPP, %) 87 73 ..
Life expectancy at birth (years) 58 52 57
Infant mortality (per 1,000 live births) 88 83 77
Child malnutrition (% of children under 5) 23 25 28
Adult literacy, male (% of ages 15 and o lder) 50 72 73
Adult literacy, female (% of ages 15 and o lder) 26 54 59
Gross primary enro llment, male (% of age group) 97 105 107
Gross primary enro llment, female (% of age group) 83 95 100
Access to an improved water source (% of population) 71 60 64
Access to improved sanitation facilities (% of population) 19 31 35
N et A id F lo ws 1980 1990 2000 2009 a
(US$ millions)
Net ODA and official aid 89 292 153 319
Top 3 donors (in 2007):
France 9 87 20 73
United States 8 0 26 43
European Commission 21 33 16 35
Aid (% of GNI) .. 11.6 5.0 9.6
Aid per capita (US$) 19 47 18 32
Lo ng-T erm Eco no mic T rends
Consumer prices (annual % change) .. 23.3 6.8 11.6
GDP implicit deflator (annual % change) .. 17.3 11.1 5.2
Exchange rate (annual average, local per US$) 19.0 660.2 1,746.9 5,314.4
Terms of trade index (2000 = 100) .. 145 100 106
1980–90 1990–2000 2000–09
Population, mid-year (millions) 4.6 6.1 8.4 10.1 2.8 3.1 2.0
GDP (US$ millions) .. 2,667 3,112 4,103 .. 4.4 3.0
Agriculture .. 23.8 20.3 17.2 .. 4.3 6.7
Industry .. 33.3 32.5 53.0 .. 4.9 4.4
M anufacturing .. 4.6 4.0 5.3 .. 4.0 3.1
Services .. 42.9 47.2 29.8 .. 3.6 -2.7
Household final consumption expenditure .. 66.9 77.7 75.2 .. 5.2 3.4
General gov't final consumption expenditure .. 11.0 6.8 8.0 .. -0.5 0.3
Gross capital formation .. 24.5 19.7 21.6 .. 0.1 -0.5
Exports o f goods and services .. 31.1 23.6 40.7 .. 0.3 2.3
Imports of goods and services .. 33.4 27.9 45.4 .. -1.1 0.5
Gross savings .. 14.6 13.3 0.2
Note: Figures in italics are for years other than those specified. 2009 data are preliminary. .. indicates data are not available.
a. A id data are for 2008.
Development Economics, Development Data Group (DECDG).
(average annual growth %)
(% of GDP)
10 5 0 5 10
0-4
15-19
30-34
45-49
60-64
75-79
percent of total population
Age distribution, 2009
Male Female
0
50
100
150
200
250
1990 1995 2000 2008
Guinea Sub-Saharan Africa
Under-5 mortality rate (per 1,000)
-2
0
2
4
6
95 05
GDP GDP per capita
Growth of GDP and GDP per capita (%)
Mt. NimbaMt. Nimba(1752 m)(1752 m)
NNiimm
bbaa MMttss..
G U I N E EG U I N E EM A R I T I M EM A R I T I M E
G U I N E EG U I N E E
F O R E S T I E R EF O R E S T I E R E
M O Y E N N EM O Y E N N E
G U I N E EG U I N E E
H A U T EH A U T EG U I N E EG U I N E E
Kole
ntKo
lent
éé
Bafin
gBa
fing
Sank
aran
i
Sank
aran
i
Nig
erN
iger
GGaammbbiiaa
KKoo nnkk oouurr éé
TTiinnkkiissssooKKoogg
oonn
NNiiaanntt
aann DDiioonn
SSaannkk
aarraann
ii
MMiilloo
TToommiinnéé
SansalSansalééSangarSangaréédidi
CoyahCoyah
BissikrimaBissikrima
NyagassolaNyagassola
MoribayaMoribaya
FoulamFoulamôôriri BalakiBalaki
KintinianKintinian
TTiroiro
SibiribaroSibiribaro
BoolaBoola
DiDiéékkéé
SokouralaSokourala
NiandankoroNiandankoro
DokoDoko
FriaFria
BokBokéé
PitaPita
MaliMali
YYomouomou
BeylaBeyla
BofBoffafa
MamouMamou
LLééloumalouma
DalabaDalabaDabolaDabola
TTongueongue
GaoualGaoual
MacentaMacenta
FaranahFaranah
SiguiriSiguiri
KKéérouanerouane
TTéélimlimééllééee
KoundaraKoundara
LolaLola
GuGuééckckéédoudou
KouroussaKouroussa
ForForéécariahcariah
DinguirayeDinguiraye
KissidougouKissidougou
MandianaMandiana
LabLabéé
KindiaKindia
KankanKankan
NzNzéérréé-kor-koréé
GUINEA-BISSAU
S E N E G A L
M A L I
C Ô T ED ' I V O I R E
S I E R R A L E O N E
L I B E R I A
TTo o BafatBafatáá
TTo o TTambacoundaambacounda
TTo o TTambacoundaambacounda
TTo o TTambacoundaambacounda
TTo o KayesKayes
TTo o KayesKayes
TTo Bamakoo Bamako
TTo Bougounio Bougouni
TTooKorhogoKorhogo
TTooSSééguguéélala
TTooManMan
TTooMagburakaMagburaka
TTooMagburakaMagburaka
TTooFreetownFreetown
G U I N E EM A R I T I M E
G U I N E E
F O R E S T I E R E
M O Y E N N E
G U I N E E
H A U T EG U I N E E
Kamsar
SansaléSangarédi
CoyahDubréka
Bissikrima
Nyagassola
Moribaya
Foulamôri Balaki
Kintinian
Tiro
Sibiribaro
Boola
Diéké
Sokourala
Niandankoro
Doko
Fria
Boké
Pita
Mali
Yomou
Beyla
Boffa
Mamou
Lélouma
DalabaDabola
Tongue
Gaoual
Macenta
Faranah
Siguiri
Kérouane
Télimélée
Koundara
Lola
Guéckédou
Kouroussa
Forécariah
Dinguiraye
Kissidougou
Mandiana
Labé
Kindia
Kankan
Nzéré-koré
CONAKRY
GUINEA-BISSAU
S E N E G A L
M A L I
C Ô T ED ' I V O I R E
S I E R R A L E O N E
L I B E R I A
Niger
Kole
nté
Bafin
g
Sank
aran
i
Nig
er
Gambia
Ko nk ouré
Tinkisso
Makona
Kogon
Niant
an Dion
Sank
aran
i
Milo
Tominé
A T L A N T I C
O C E A N
To Bafatá
To Tambacounda
To Tambacounda
To Tambacounda
To Kayes
To Kayes
To Bamako
To Bougouni
ToKorhogo
ToSéguéla
ToMan
ToMagburaka
ToMagburaka
ToFreetown
Nim
ba Mts. Mt. Nimba(1752 m)
12°N
10°N
12°N
10°N
8°N
14°W
14°W
12°W 10°W 8°W
12°W 10°W 8°W
GUINEA
This map was produced by the Map Design Unit of The World Bank. The boundaries, colors, denominations and any other informationshown on this map do not imply, on the part of The World BankGroup, any judgment on the legal status of any territory, or anyendorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
0 20 40 60 80
0 20 40 60 80 Miles
100 Kilometers IBRD 33414
NO
VEM
BER 2004
GUINEASELECTED CITIES AND TOWNS
PREFECTURE CAPITALS
REGION CAPITALS
NATIONAL CAPITAL
RIVERS
MAIN ROADS
RAILROADS
PREFECTURE BOUNDARIES
REGION BOUNDARIES
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES
1
Document of
The World Bank
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Report No: T7744-GM
REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA TECHNICAL ANNEX
ON A PROPOSED
GRANT
IN THE AMOUNT OF
SDR 21.6 MILLION
(US$ 35 MILLION EQUIVALENT)
TO THE REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA
AS PART OF SDR 56.8 MILLION (US$ 92 MILLION EQUIVALENT)
FOR THE SECOND SERIES OF PROJECTS UNDER THE FIRST PHASE OF WEST
AFRICA REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (WARCIP
APL1B)
May 25, 2011
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the
performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World
Bank authorization.
2
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(Exchange Rate Effective date April 29, 2011
Currency Unit =
SDR 0.616921 = US$1
FISCAL YEAR
January 1 – December 31
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
$
ACE
United States dollar, all dollars are US dollars unless
otherwise indicated
Africa Coast to Europe Submarine Cable
AfDB African Development Bank
AICD
APL
Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic
Adaptable Program Loan
AU
BP
African Union
Bank Procedures
CAS Country Assistance Strategy
C&MA
CPAR
CSOs
Construction and Maintenance Agreement
Country Procurement Assessment Review
Civil Society Organizations
ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States
ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan
GAMTEL Gambia Telecommunications Company
Gbit/s
GDP
GLO-1
Gigabit per second
Gross Domestic Product
GlobaCom-1 Cable
GNIC
GoTG
Gambia National Insurance Company
Government of The Gambia
GPT General Purpose Technology
ICB
ICT
International competitive Bidding
Information and Communication Technology
IDA International Development Association
IFMIS
IFR
IRR
IsDB
ISP
Integrated Financial Management and Information System
Intermediate Financial reports
Internal Rate of Return
Islamic Development Bank
Internet Service Provider
3
ISPAG
ITU
Internet Service Provider Association of The Gambia
International Telecommunication Union
IXP
JAS
Internet Exchange Point
Joint Assistance Strategy
Kbit/s
Mb
Kilobit per second
Megabit
Mbit/s
M&E
MIS
MoF
MoICI
Megabit per second
Monitoring and Evaluation
Management Information System
Ministry of Finance
Ministry of Information and Communications Infrastructure
NGN
NICI
NPV
OD
Next Generation Network
National Information Communications Infrastructure
Net Present Value
Operational Directives
OM Operational Manual
PAD
PIM
PIU
Project Appraisal Document
Project Implementation Manual
Project Implementation Unit
PPA Project Preparation Advance
PPP
PPP
PRSP
PURA
Public-Private Partnership
Purchasing Power Parity
Poverty Reeducation Strategy Paper
Public Utilities Regulatory Authority
RAP Resettlement Action Plan
RPF Resettlement Policy Framework
SAT-3 South Atlantic Three cable
SLA
SOE
SPV
Service level Agreement
Statement of Expenditures
Special Purpose Vehicle
ToR
VoIP
VSAT
Terms of Reference
Voice Over Internet Protocol
Very Small Aperture Terminal
WASC West African Submarine Cable
WARCIP West Africa Regional Communications Infrastructure Project
WBG
UNDP
World Bank Group
United Nations Development Program
4
Vice President: Obiageli K. Ezekwesili
Director for Regional Integration:
Acting Country Director for The Gambia:
Yusupha B.Crookes
Benjamin McDonald
Sector Director:
Sector Manager :
Jose Luis Irigoyen
Philippe Dongier
Task Team Leaders for WARCIP APL 1B:
Task Team Leader for WARCIP-Gambia:
Boutheina Guermazi and Mavis Ampah
Boutheina Guermazi
5
Table of Contents
I. Strategic Context ..................................................................................................................... 1
A. Country Context ............................................................................................................... 1
B. Sectoral and Institutional Context .................................................................................... 2
C. Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes .............................................. 6
II. Project Development Objectives............................................................................................. 7
A. PDO .................................................................................................................................. 7
i. Project Beneficiaries ........................................................................................................ 8
ii. PDO Level Results Indicators ...................................................................................... 8
III. Project Description............................................................................................................... 8
A. Project components .......................................................................................................... 8
B. Project Financing............................................................................................................ 12
i. Lending Instrument ........................................................................................................ 12
ii. Project Financing Table .............................................................................................. 12
C. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design ................................................... 13
IV. Implementation .................................................................................................................. 14
A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ............................................................ 14
B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................ 14
C. Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 16
V. Key Risks .............................................................................................................................. 16
VI. Appraisal Summary ........................................................................................................... 17
A. Economic and Financial Analysis .................................................................................. 17
B. Technical ........................................................................................................................ 18
C. Financial Management ................................................................................................... 19
D. Procurement ................................................................................................................... 20
E. Social and Environment ................................................................................................. 20
F. Legal conditions and covenants ......................................................................................... 21
Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring.............................................................................. 23
Annex 2: Detailed Project Description ........................................................................................ 25
Annex 3: Implementation Arrangements ..................................................................................... 30
Annex 4 Operational Risk Assessment Framework (ORAF) ....................................................... 48
Annex 5: Implementation Support Plan ........................................................................................ 51
Annex 6: Team Composition ........................................................................................................ 54
Annex 7: Economic and Financial Analysis ................................................................................. 55
1
I. Strategic Context
A. Country Context
1. The Gambia‟s service sector contributes over half of national gross domestic product,
even though almost three-quarters of the population still depend on agriculture for
their livelihood. The country has a population of about 1.8 million, and is territorially the
smallest one on the African continent (11,295 square km). The Gambia has limited natural
resources and its main domestically-produced exports are groundnuts, fish, and cotton lint.
Most of its earnings in merchandise trade are derived from re-exports. The Gambia has
sustained positive economic growth rates since 2003, averaging over 6 % per year up to
2010 with only a modest economic slowdown following the 2008 global financial crisis.
GNI per capita in 2009 was US$ 440. Recent poverty estimates still places 61 % of the
population below the national poverty line, with over 34 % living on less than US$1.25 a
day (PPP).1
2. Poverty Reduction Strategy. The country‟s first Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP
I) was implemented between 2003 and 2005, and the second PRSP covers an
implementation period of five years (2007 – 2011). This second PRSP outlines an overall
policy framework for growth and poverty reduction based on five pillars: (i). Creating an
enabling policy environment to promote growth and poverty reduction, (ii). Enhancing the
capacity and output of productive sectors - agriculture, fisheries, industry, trade and tourism,
with emphasis on productive capacities of the poor and vulnerable populations, (iii).
Improving coverage of the basic social services and social protection needs of the poor and
vulnerable, (iv). Enhancing governance systems and building the capacity of local
communities and civil society organizations (CSOs) to play an active role in economic
growth and poverty reduction, and (v). Mainstreaming poverty-related cross-cutting issues
into poverty reduction. West Africa Regional Communications Infrastructure Program
(WARCIP) is aligned with this Poverty Reduction Strategy. as well as with the 2008-2011
Joint Assistance Strategy (JAS). Support for the development of a competitive ICT sector
with domestic access to international fiber optic cables resulting into affordable high speed
Internet services and lower communications cost has the potential to strengthen the
realisation of the PRSP pillars. Improvement of the availability and increased affordability
of high-speed Internet infrastructure will also allow the introduction of applications to
improve service delivery and strengthen economic management (JAS pillar 1). It will
accelerate growth and competitiveness (JAS pillar 2).
3. Regional integration is critical for The Gambia‟s sustained economic growth. The need
for greater regional economic and infrastructure integration is obvious and the lack of such
infrastructure holds The Gambia and other countries back from achieving greater economic
growth and making progress on the Millennium Development Goals. For instance, the
African Infrastructure Country Diagnostic (AICD) report posits that if West Africa‟s
infrastructure could be upgraded to the level of the best performing country in Africa
(Mauritius), the impact on per capita economic growth would be in the order of 5 percentage
points2. This estimate is important because The Gambia‟s growth is very dependent on
1 UN Development Indicators- http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Table5.pdf
2 Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic Report – ECOWAS‟s Infrastructure: A Regional Perspective, April 2010
2
addressing regional challenges and more effective regional integration. Regional cooperation
is high on the Government of The Gambia‟s (GoTG) national agenda, with a view to take
advantage of regional infrastructure, allowing the country to benefit from growing regional
trade and investment. The Gambia is an active member in the African Union (AU) and the
Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).
4. A regional telecommunications market is key for effective regional integration and
growth. Between 1995 and 2005, infrastructure improvements are estimated to have
boosted West Africa‟s growth by about one percentage point per capita per year. This
positive contribution to growth was almost entirely attributed to the Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) revolution while it is believed that a deficient power
infrastructure held back economic growth by about 0.1 percentage point per capita per year.3
5. The WARCIP will contribute to a comprehensive solution to address connectivity gaps
in The Gambia. The focus of WARCIP- The Gambia is to contribute to a comprehensive
solution to address connectivity gaps in the country, focusing on international, regional and
national connectivity to enable the creation of a fully integrated network which will provide
affordable high speed connectivity to the country. The project will improve connectivity in
the region as a number of neighbouring countries, notably Guinea Bissau, will also be able
to access to international cables through The Gambia connection.
B. Sectoral and Institutional Context
6. The Gambia is in the top ten countries in Africa in terms of cellular penetration. The
telecommunication sector in The Gambia has been competitive since 2001, and The
Gambia‟s mobile penetration is well above the African average. Mobile penetration has
soared from 16% in 2005 to 84% in 2009, and reached approximately 95% of the population
by the end of September 2010. Four mobile companies operate mobile services (Gambia
Telecommunication or GAMTEL competes as GAMCEL against QCELL, AFRICELL and
Comium). Nigeria‟s Globacom also received an authorisation to operate in 2010.
AFRICELL was the first private operator to enter the mobile market in 2001, and is now the
leading mobile operator with 45% share of the market with a mobile footprint that covers
91% of the country. QCELL offers 3G services and all other operators have authorization to
operate 3G networks.
7. Fixed-line penetration remains very low at 2.87%. GAMTEL was established as a state-
owned company in March 1984. GAMTEL is the only fixed-line operator. In 2007 the
company was partially privatized through the sale of a 50% stake to Lebanese
telecommunication company, Spectrum. The agreement also involved the sale of 50% of
GAMCEL, the state-owned mobile phone operator. This agreement was revoked by the
Government in November 2008 on the basis of a fundamental breach of contract. GAMTEL
continues to be a state owned, limited liability company, with The Gambia government
owning 99% of the shares, and Gambia National Insurance Company (GNIC) owning 1%.
GAMTEL plans an expanded and upgraded national fiber backbone, as part of its Next
Generation Network (NGN) strategy.
3 Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic Report – ECOWAS‟s Infrastructure: A Regional Perspective, April 2010
3
8. Internet penetration has only slowly been on the rise, despite competition and
introduction of new technologies. Internet services are available across the country
provided by two of the mobile operators and six major Internet service providers (ISPs). In
total there are about 15,000 Internet subscribers. The number is expected to increase with
the mobile operator's 3G service offerings.
9. The sector suffers from the lack of adequate international connectivity. The Gambia has
one of the first fiber element of backbones on the continent, however, for international
connectivity the country currently depends on a single unstable high-cost 155 Mbit/s
terrestrial link to neighbouring Senegal, which has also contributed to high prices at the
retail level and reduced the level of reliability. Additionally, international bandwidth is
accessed through satellite links to Europe and North America for a total of 14 Mbit/s.
International traffic is directed through Senegal and Guinea-Bissau using microwave radio
links. The country also has a satellite earth station- 1 Intelsat. Average satellite prices are
however between US$4,000-5,000 for 1 Mbit/s (compared with about, US$200 in the US,
and approximately US$500 in East Africa4) and result in high connectivity costs. Currently,
The Gambia uses about 155Mbit/s of bandwidth of which 60-70 % is sold onto private ISPs
who charge high end user prices. There are six commercial ISPs - Net Page Solution
(GAMTEL‟s ISP), QuantumNet, Lainix, Connexion Solutions and Unique Solutions- who
together form the ISP Association of The Gambia (ISPAG). Monthly packages for home
users with private ISPs are from US$30 per month for 128 Kbit/s plus an initial connection
and equipment costs of around US$500. This service represents roughly 120 % of GNI per
capita (2009). Higher speed services are US$150 per month (256 Kbit/s). Corporate
companies pay US$2500 per month for a 1 Mbit/s bandwidth data service.
10. The Gambia adopted a National Information and Communication Infrastructure
(NICI) policy focusing on the role of ICT to implement Vision 2020. The NICI policy
and plan were adopted in 2004 and the National ICT policy adopted in 2010. The policy
framework was designed to address the areas where ICT would facilitate the achievement of
the Vision 2020 overall objective, which is to transform the nation into a middle-income
country by 2020 through accelerating private sector development, restructuring economic
management, developing the human capital base, and institutionalizing decentralized and
democratic participatory government structures, processes and systems. The overall
objective for the policy is to “leapfrog” several stages of development by establishing a
participatory approach in building human resources and a conducive environment that
utilises ICT as a platform to exchange data, information, and knowledge and as a tool to
implement applications and provide services to achieve higher growth rates in all spheres of
socio-economic activities. An Information and Communications Act -ICT Act- enacted in
2009 provides for the restructuring, development and regulation of the information and
communication sector.
11. The GoTG has ambitious plans to support the uptake of the ICT sector. The Ministry
of Information and Communications Infrastructure (MoICI) has an ambitious program to
become the „Silicon Valley of Africa‟ focusing on human resource development, e-
4 After landing of the Seacom submarine cable in Kenya in July 2009, spot short-term pricing terms for 1 Mb were
in the range of $400 - $600/Mb while longer term (e.g. 15-20 year IRU basis) pricing terms were as low as $150 –
200/Mb. The Mombasa to London segment alone was estimated to be within the $50-$70/Mb price range.
4
education (including provision of Internet connections to all schools and tertiary
institutions), and community-use of ICTs. As part of this, MoICI is participating in the AU‟s
Panafrican e-network supported by the government of India, developing a Technology Park
with support from the governments of Egypt and Taiwan, China. MoICI is also working to
establish e-government applications, an Internet Exchange Point (IXP) and provision of ICT
training facilities. It is worth noting the government‟s grand plans for this comprehensive e-
apps vision cannot be realized unless there is higher quality and more cost effective
bandwidth capacity
12. The legal and regulatory environment encourages competition in the sector. The ICT
Act of 2009 aims to create a regulatory environment under which more competition will be
introduced to more sectors of the telecommunications market. Taking into account
convergence, the new law aims to foster a technology-neutral licensing environment, which
will also liberalise the use of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Internet telephony. The
Gambia Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) was established under The Gambia
Public Utilities Regulatory Authority Act, 2001 and is a multi-sector regulatory authority
that regulates the activities of providers of certain public services including communications
services. Currently, PURA and MoICI have been tasked with the regulation of certain
aspects of the telecoms sector. PURA however, remains in need for capacity strengthening
to assume its role in a fast changing ICT environment, and the institution faces limitations in
terms of human and financial resources.
13. Incomplete liberalization further contributes to high international connectivity costs.
While the new ICT Act has created the potential for a much more liberalized market
environment, in practice this has yet to occur. A major contributing factor to the difficulty of
obtaining bandwidth capacity at low prices is the monopoly on international fiber links by
incumbent state-owned operator. The monopolization on the international gateway by
GAMTEL promotes high prices and suppresses the demand of the country‟s nearly 2
million people. End users also experience an unreliable connectivity due to bandwidth
filtering by the state-operator. As a consequence of the monopoly on the international
gateway, outgoing international voice traffic is very low around 5 minutes per inhabitant
(the ECOWAS average is just over 11 minutes per inhabitant.) International call charges are
high, costing between US$$0.30-0.68 per minute depending on destination country. When
the international gateway was liberalized for one year in 2006 the price of international calls
dropped by 64%, demonstrating the high costs users are currently paying for international
calls. The existing monopoly for Spectrum (Company managing GAMTEL‟s international
gateway) will expire in early 2012 (before the cable becomes operational). The 2009
Communications Act prohibits new exclusivities on any segment of the market. In addition
the law includes a technology neutral definition of services. Operators applying for an
international gateway license have the option to either use satellite or cable technologies to
terminate/originate their traffic.
14. Poor telecommunications services constrain social and economic development. Despite
noteworthy developments since the initiation of the reform agenda, the sector‟s potential to
improve the competitiveness of The Gambia‟s economy, facilitate economic growth and
social reconstruction and ensure fuller integration of the country in the global economy is
constrained. The lack of access to international submarine cables has resulted in low
5
bandwidth and high price Internet service, which prevents The Gambia from benefiting
from the introduction of advanced ICT enabled applications. The lack of access to low price
and high quality telecommunications services is a factor that limits the potential of The
Gambia to create jobs, expand production of goods and services, and trade competitively
with the rest of the world.
15. The Africa Coast to Europe (ACE) cable represents a unique opportunity for
international connectivity in The Gambia. For purposes of international connectivity
along the coast of West Africa and with the rest of the world, the most attractive and
efficient viable option for The Gambia is to connect to the ACE submarine cable, which is
to be an approximately 17,000km submarine cable system connecting South Africa to
Europe and connecting 23 countries including a landing station in The Gambia. The ACE
cable is expected to become operational in the first half of 20125. An analysis of other
possible options for improving international connectivity in The Gambia clearly shows that
connecting to other cables will involve a higher cost than connection through ACE. Existing
cables like MainOne and the West Africa Submarine Cable (WASC) did not include
proposed landing stations in The Gambia. GAMTEL, the incumbent fixed line operator
signed the ACE submarine cable Construction and Maintenance Agreement (C&MA) on
June 5, 2010 and have made payments to cover the first three installments. The GoTG is
now seeking support from the Bank to cover the remaining payments, as neither GAMTEL
nor the GoTG is in a position to cover the full cost without concessional financing. The
GoTG is interested in replicating the approach followed by Liberia and Sierra Leone in
which the World Bank financed the cost of ACE membership fees for both countries.
16. The World Bank has already conducted legal and regulatory due diligence on the
ACE C&MA as part of project preparation of WARCIP APL 1-A for Liberia and
Sierra Leone. Similar to the cases of Liberia and Sierra Leone, a Special Purpose Vehicle
(SPV) company will be created for the purpose of participating as an ACE member and
managing and operating the landing station. In the case of The Gambia, support from the
World Bank requires a change of the ACE member signatory from GAMTEL to the new
SPV. The team started discussions with ACE and with GAMTEL to ensure timely
completion of the process before the project becomes effective.
17. The World Bank has approved a Project Preparation Advance (PPA) to help The
Gambia capitalize on the ACE opportunity. An initial PPA for US$ 2 million was
granted to The Gambia to support project preparation activities. Under this PPA, support is
being given to optimize the governance, ownership, and financing issues related to the
operation of the landing station and provision of networks and services emanating from the
ACE cable. Additional support for environmental and social safeguards acceptable to the
World Bank was provided under the PPA and allowed the development of an Environmental
and Social Management Plan (ESMP) and a Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan (RRP) for
the project. The PPA also included policy, legal and regulatory environment technical
assistance to ensure open access6, the creation of a broadband policy and design of a
5 http://www.ace-submarinecable.com/preview/documents/ACECapacityMagazine.pdf
6 Open access is broadly defined as an equal opportunity for operators to have unfettered access to given
infrastructure or services under similar terms and conditions
6
strategy to stimulate bandwidth demand, support for setting up the Project Implementation
Unit (PIU) as well as capacity building support for the PIU.
18. GoTG committed to open access principles beyond the landing station. In Parallel to
this support, The Gambia sought support from the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) to roll
out a more comprehensive fiber backbone initially operated by GAMTEL and requested
World Bank support to help structure open access regime for the national backbone. The
GoTG is interested to develop a communications infrastructure strategy with medium term
targets looking at approaches for divesting the backbone and/or including private sector
management for the backbone. The possibility for the SPV that will be established for the
landing station to take more participation on backbone management was discussed and
could be implemented following results of the study and incorporating lessons learned from
the Public Private Partnership (PPP) experience in the landing station. This will dramatically
accelerate the implementation of NICI strategy and allow the country to fully leverage
connecting to ACE.
C. Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes
19. A full connectivity solution will promote cheaper access to communications and
promote more effective global integration. WARCIP Gambia proposes to contribute to a
full connectivity solution, building on new and existing communications opportunities. The
project is expected to focus on catalytic financing for additional links to international and
national infrastructure (where gaps exist that cannot be addressed by the private sector, and
where there‟s clear evidence of positive externalities) as well as targeted technical assistance
to help The Gambia take full advantage of the resulting international connectivity. By
gaining access to international cables, The Gambia will have better and cheaper access to
communications and be able to connect more effectively with the rest of the world.
20. Intensification of broadband networks stimulates investment and economic growth.
The contribution of broadband networks to economic growth is much more pronounced than
that of narrowband networks. Additional studies have suggested that a 10 percent point
increase in the penetration of broadband in developing countries equates to a 1.4 % increase
in GDP per capita.7 The mobile platform is also highlighted especially as the single most
powerful way to reach and deliver public and private services to hundreds of millions of
people in remote and rural areas across the developing world. New businesses in the ICT
and IT enabled services sector often result from improved access to broadband.
21. In allowing business to communicate more efficiently WARCIP Gambia will increase
private business productivity and profitability. Furthermore, the project will assist in
improving private sector development. The telecommunications and ICT sectors have been
proven to improve business productivity and profitability. This, in turn has the potential to
generate more tax revenues for the government. In this context, policy makers and
regulatory officials in The Gambia will need to be well equipped to provide the most
conducive environment for the private sector to invest and use ICT. Empowering the
national regulator and key policy makers with adequate tools and skills to design,
7 World Bank, Information and Communications for Development 2009: Extending Reach and Increasing Impact.
7
implement, and upgrade the regulatory environment is a critical element for successful
sector reform and development.
22. Increased bandwidth access will provide the opportunity for The Gambia to take
advantage of the transformational impact of ICT. As a cross-cutting enabler of service
delivery, impacts of ICT have been well documented in particular in improving the quality,
efficiency, and reach of basic services such as health, education, and other essential services,
particularly to underserved and poorer communities. Availability of affordable
telecommunications infrastructure is a key requirement to develop and roll out applications
that benefit the poor and disenfranchised. For example in Kenya, a third of the population
now has access to basic banking services using mobiles– while less than five % of the
population previously had a bank account. As the cost of telecommunication services goes
down in The Gambia, similar applications are likely to also surface. In addition, with the
opportunity to obtain needed bandwidth to stimulate development of innovative applications
for use in government institutions, the project will assist in improving governance and
transparency of government functions.
23. The proposed operation is fully in line with the March 21, 2010 Regional Integration
Assistance Strategy (RIAS) Update Partnering for Africa’s Regional Integration and the
West Africa Implementation Action Plan (2010). The RIAS seeks to create economies of
scale, facilitate intra-regional trade and exports and connect landlocked countries to regional
and global trade routes by reducing barriers to movement of goods and services between
countries and improve the regional business environment. Helping The Gambia connect to
the global high speed Internet Networks very much support these objectives. In addition
WARCIP is featured as a flagship project in the RIAS Update.
24. The proposed operation is fully in line with the new World Bank Africa Strategy
Africa’s Future and the World Bank’s Support to It (2011). By facilitating cheaper access
to internet and supporting the development of national and regional communications
infrastructure, WARCIP The Gambia will promote sustainable employment
(Competitiveness & employment ) and will create a critical building block for ICT
applications (Governance & Public sector capacity). The program also focuses on
partnerships (a key element of the Africa Strategy) by leveraging private sector investment
in the ACE submarine cable.
II. Project Development Objectives
A. PDO
25. The project development objective (PDO) of WARCIP-The Gambia is to increase
the geographical reach of broadband networks and reduce costs of communications
services in the territory of The Gambia.8
8 All projects which are part of WARCIP APLs use the same PDO.
8
26. The project has three main components with the ultimate aim being to enhance The
Gambia economic integration. WARCIP-The Gambia seeks to contribute to lowering the
cost and improving quality of connectivity in The Gambia. In order to reach this objective,
the project proposes an integrated approach focusing on (i) the connection of The Gambia to
global broadband fiber optics infrastructure, (ii) creating an enabling environment, dealing
with transactional issues related to the ACE cable and institutional strengthening to remove
existing bottlenecks for private sector participation in both national and regional
infrastructure development. The ultimate objective of the project is to reduce isolation of The
Gambia‟s economy and support its participation in the global economy.
i. Project Beneficiaries
27. WARCIP will benefit the citizens of The Gambia. All over Africa, businesses,
governments, teachers, doctors, farmers, and fishermen, are using ICTs to communicate,
share information, improve productivity and service delivery, find better prices, improve
access to markets, and increase their bargaining power. The situation is the same in The
Gambia. The proposed project will therefore benefit the entire population of the country
including telecommunications operators, telecommunications users, universities, schools,
hospitals, banks, corporate users, and GoTG ministries and departments. However, for the
purpose of M&E, the PIU will define Direct Project Beneficiaries in a more restrictive way to
include Number of active fixed and mobile subscribers (internet subscribers not accounted to
avoid double counting).
ii. PDO Level Results Indicators
Table 1: PDO Level Results Indicators9
Outcome Indicators At closing of the project
Volume of international traffic (Kbit/s) per person
Access to internet services (% of population)
Average monthly price of wholesale international E1 capacity link from capital
city to Europe
Number of direct project beneficiaries, of which female
30
3.0
Less than US$1,000
1.8 m (51%)
III. Project Description
A. Project components
28. WARCIP -The Gambia will have 3 components: (i) Infrastructure component to improve
connectivity, (ii) Technical Assistance component to create enabling environment related to
leveraging the international connectivity opportunity and transactional issues relating to the
ACE cable, and (iii) Implementation support component.
9 For WARCIP The Gambia, the indicator related to access to telecommunications services (fixed and mobile
services) will not be measured. The Gambia has a very high penetration rate (over 90%) and the project is not
expected to increase access further.
9
Component 1 Supporting Connectivity (US $25.75 million)
(a) International Connectivity- US $ 24.5 million
29. International connectivity will be improved through the financing of The Gambia‟s
consortium fee to the ACE submarine cable. The bulk of this component will be used to
finance The Gambia‟s participation in ACE. The ACE project is proceeding quickly, with
substantial payment requirements of its members. The Gambia has already made three
payments amounting to US$ 7.5 million since June 2010. Given the schedule of payments,
World Bank support of US$ 7 million will be made under retroactive financing, and the
remaining amount will take the form of direct disbursement to ACE.
30. GoTG payment for ACE will be made on behalf of the SPV and partly re-imbursed by
the SPV‟s private participants before the project ends The SPV is in the process of being
created to finance and manage the access to ACE and the landing station in Banjul. Legal
support was provided under the PPA to support the Government to set up the SPV with a
target date for establishment no later than July 2011. Discussion with operators revealed
high level of interest from the private sector (both from mobile operators and from Internet
Service Providers) to co-finance the landing station and to be associated with operating and
managing the facility and the resulting international connectivity capacity. The initial
shareholding approach includes participation from GAMTEL (30%), private operators
(AFRICELL, QCELL, Comium and the ISPAG for 51%). The remaining GoTG shares not
subscribed by the private participants will be made available to new participants under a
divestment plan. Original shareholders of the SPV could also be offered the opportunity to
increase their shares and acquire additional capacity. Support is provided under the PPA for
the establishment of the SPV. The GoTG also considers using a part of its shares (9%) to
provide capacity for government and social use. The final details of the shareholder structure
will be included in the shareholder agreement under preparation through PPA resources.
(b) Regional connectivity ( US$ 1.25 million)
31. Broadband will be provided to improve priority services. While international fiber links
could potentially facilitate better and cheaper access to communications in The Gambia, the
full benefits of this access cannot be achieved without further investments in national
infrastructure and effective use of ICT for critical services. IDA resources will therefore be
used to fund: (i) the national Internet Exchange Point (IXP), (ii) development of high speed
government virtual network for selected Government institutions and (iii) developing a
feasibility study for connection between The Gambia and neighboring countries to
commercialize excess capacity from ACE to less connected neighbors (i.e., Guinea Bissau).
Implementation of this connectivity could be financed by the proceeds from the private
sector participation in the SPV.
32. The GoTG is likely to complement IDA resources for the purpose of additional
national backbone infrastructure. It is expected that the GoTG will complement IDA
resources for the purpose of additional national broadband infrastructure by investing the
10
proceeds from the sale of GoTG shares in the SPV. Resources from the PPA are helping to
develop the framework, plans and support for the divestiture.
33. The IsDB will complement project funding. IDA resources will be further complemented
by funding projected to come from the IsDB for backbone development in The Gambia. The
IsDB funding is expected to be made in parallel. Funding from IsDB was approved on April
30, 2011 and will be provided to GAMTEL for backbone development and Next Generation
Network deployment. It is worth noting that for the international connectivity component
the World Bank funded facilities are feasible on their own and are not dependent on other
facilities being built by other donors. In addition, at the request of the GoTG, the project will
coordinate with the GoTG and IsDB to ensure that the backbone is governed by open access
principles to ensure that Gambian consumers benefit from lower cost connections.
Component 2 - Creating an enabling environment for connectivity (US$ 7.25 million).
34. Support to optimize the governance, ownership and financing issues related to the
operation of the landing station and provision of networks and services emanating
from the ACE cable. This component will provide Technical Assistance (TA) and the
capacity building necessary to support the successful implementation of Component 1 of the
project. Specifically, Component 2 will focus on the transaction design and operating model
for ownership and management of international, regional and national infrastructure using
PPP frameworks consistent with open access principles to create an enabling environment
for improved connectivity.10
The PPP frameworks will focus on principles of open and non-
discriminatory access while maximizing the role of the private sector. This component will
also focus on strengthening the policy and regulatory environment to promote further sector
reform in order to maximize benefits from access to international capacity and liberalized
international gateway. The creation of a new Broadband policy as well as a strategy to
stimulate bandwidth demand will be supported given the high bandwidth capacity that will
enter the country. A number of the activities under enabling environment have been
launched as part of the PPA.
35. Legal and regulatory safeguards for open access will be created. In addition to
transaction design, this component will focus on addressing policy and regulatory
bottlenecks at the national level to maximize the benefits of the proposed connectivity
agenda, and maximize benefits from access to international capacity and liberalized
international gateway. Specific steps would need to be taken, however, in particular to
establish a clear regulatory regime for access and operation of the landing station as well as
develop an open access regime for the national backbone including regulatory regime for
wholesale pricing, in order to ensure that The Gambia fully benefits from the potential
connectivity that the cable offers. Most of the activities under enabling environment are also
included as part of PPA. The activities have been designed so that key elements for the PPP
framework (i.e. SPV for the landing station) are in place for the investment component.
10
Open access is broadly defined as an equal opportunity for operators to have unfettered access to given
infrastructure or services under similar terms and conditions
11
36. Broadband policy and demand stimulation strategy and implementation support. This
activity will support the Government in developing a comprehensive policy to promote
broadband use in The Gambia to facilitate uptake of demand and applications using the
capacity that will be available to The Gambia following ACE landing. Implementation
support will also be included under this activity to target key areas with significant growth
potential for The Gambia.
37. Implementation support for strategic repositioning of GAMTEL This component will
assist the company with options and strategy to reposition GAMTEL in the market
following the ACE landing with the objective of improving the efficiency, productivity,
customer service delivery, and provide technical and capacity building support to facilitate
overall financial and operational performance. The strategic repositioning could cover
restructuring, a management contract or opening the company to private investment.
38. Support for MoICI on key policy issues: The project will support the MoICI in three key
activities related to (i) development of a communications infrastructure strategy looking at
financing and management of communications infrastructure in general and backbone
infrastructure in particular , (ii) development of policy and institutional framework for Top
level domain name and (iii) support to cyber-security (including access to and freedom of
information, data protection and privacy, e-transactions and authentication, cybercrime and
related issues) to create enabling conditions for increased use of broadband services in The
Gambia and for cross-border communications. The project will also include capacity
building support to the ministry through training, study tours and hiring of advisors.
39. Strengthening the regulatory function. The project will include support to PURA, the
regulator to (i) develop a regulatory action plan, (ii) develop regulatory instruments in key
regulatory priorities, (iii) design the structural separation of GAMTEL between its wholesale
activities as a backbone service provider and its retail activities, (iv) formulate a license fee
regime and carry out taxation study. This activity will also provide capacity building support
including in-house training, study tours and financing of technical advisors.
Component 3: Project implementation including contingency (US$ 2 million)
40. Support to establish Project Implementation Unit (PIU) and build capacity. This
activity will provide support needed to strengthen capacity of the GoTG to implement the
connectivity project, including setting up the Project Implementation Unit and hiring
dedicated staff to work on the project. The component will also cover office equipment,
incremental operating costs, audits, monitoring and evaluation (M&E), communications and
environmental and social studies.
12
B. Project Financing
i. Lending Instrument
41. The lending instrument is an Adaptable Program Loan (APL). WARCIP -The Gambia
is part of the second series of projects under the first phase of WARCIP (WARCIP APL
1B). The objectives of WARCIP-The Gambia are fully in line with the objectives of the
WARCIP program.
42. The Gambia met the readiness triggers identified in the WARCIP Appraisal
Document. These triggers include (i) government commitment to liberalization and open
access principles, (ii) existence of PPP framework (or willingness to formulate one as part of
preparatory activities), and (iii) government commitment to increased sector competition as
evidenced by pro-competitive policy and regulatory frameworks. The decision to include
The Gambia is based on detailed analysis of country readiness and commitment to additional
sector reforms. For The Gambia inclusion is also prompted by the urgent request of the
Government to meet tight deadlines for participation in the ACE cable. GoTG is committed
to creating a public private partnership (PPP) framework to own and manage the landing
station and open access for cable and backbone capacity.
ii. Project Financing Table
Table 3: Project Financing Table
Activities Total (US$ million)
Component 1: Improving Connectivity 25. 75
Financing Participation in ACE 24. 5
Financing Regional Connectivity 1.25
Component 2: Enabling Environment for improved connectivity 7, 25
Support to optimize the governance, ownership and financing issues related to the
operation of the landing station and provision of networks and services emanating from
the ACE cable
0.7
Legal and regulatory safeguards for open access including gateway liberalization 0.75
Broadband policy and demand stimulation strategy and implementation 1
Supporting policy making activities to develop communication infrastructure strategy
and providing, legal and regulatory framework for increased use of ICT services and
capacity building support to MoICI
1.5
GAMTEL repositioning 1.1
Development of regulatory instruments and strengthening regulatory capacity 2.2
Component 3: Project implementation, communications, and M&E 1.705
PIU set up and operating expenses 1.205
Communications, M&E and environmental studies 0.250
Initial support to SPV 0.250
Contingency 0.295
Total 35
13
C. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design
43. Country commitment to the proposed project is important. The proposed project draws
on lessons learned from previous and ongoing World Bank-financed projects in ICT and
from ongoing efforts in countries in similar situations as The Gambia. Broad global
experience in ICT project implementation indicates that an ICT project success is primarily
contingent on strong country commitment to implementation. The proposed project design
has been guided by the telecommunications sector national policy. GoTG actively sought
support from the Bank to cover the remaining payments to connect to the ACE cable, as
neither the incumbent nor the GoTG is in a position to cover the full cost without
concessional financing. GoTG‟s request to include specific regulatory activity support as
part of the project design reflects its commitment to pursue the reform of the ICT sector and
accelerate the implementation of its NICI strategy.
44. Providing support for regulatory capacity building. Regulatory capacity is necessary to
enable fair competition as problems can and will develop over time. Building such capacity
takes time. At the same time, The Gambia could benefit from the extensive experience of
other countries in this area. The proposed project focuses on building this capacity in the
regulatory authority by using in-house training, study tours, twinning arrangements and
creating opportunities for peer-to-peer learning from more advanced regulators and the
sharing of experiences.
45. There is a need for limited catalytic public funding for infrastructure to improve access
to ICT. For most developing countries, a major obstacle to the adoption of ICT remains the
lack of adequate access to ICT infrastructure. A lack of investment in ICT infrastructure and
access networks coupled with inefficient provision of services are the most important factors
undermining the development of networked economies. Catalytic public funding for
infrastructure development is justified in infrastructure market segments that fail to attract
private investment. In this project, there were initial discussions about providing IDA
funding for the total cost of international connectivity to ACE by providing funding to
GAMTEL. This approach was rejected in favor of seeking contribution from private
operators and focusing efforts on project preparation to create a PPP framework.
46. Providing alternative solutions to the use of satellite capacity can ensure sustainability.
While the proposed project could finance long term purchase of satellite capacity, this would
not be sustainable in the long run, given the associated high prices of such service. The
proposed project therefore builds on the fiber opportunity provided by ACE. The Gambia‟s
decision to join ACE is the result of an analytical process comparing available and potential
connectivity options. The World Bank commissioned a due diligence review of the process
followed by Gambia to reach the decision to join ACE. The due diligence confirms that the
decision was in line with the principle of efficiency, transparency and adherence to good
practice in the industry, when considering options such as buying satellite capacity or
gaining access to fiber by joining submarine cable consortia. The due diligence also
confirms that the option selected is by far the most economical for The Gambia (For more
details see Annex 7).
14
47. The project builds on general lessons learned in the ICT sector. Key lessons learned and
applied to the project design are: (a) project development objectives should be realistic,
focused and achievable in the country, sector and implementing agency context; (b) project
components should support country priorities and have broad ownership among
stakeholders; (c) project design should be flexible to adapt to a rapidly changing
environment; (d) implementation support should be included in Project activities with a
focus on retaining staff to ensure continuity and an accumulation of capacity within the
implementing agency.
48. The Project builds also on specific lessons learned in preparation of phase of WARCIP
APL 1-A Specific lessons from WARCIP APL 1A include payment mechanisms for
membership fees for the ACE submarine cable, safeguard issues related to landing stations,
formulation of tailored public private partnership (PPP) arrangements and open access
principles.
IV. Implementation
A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements
49. MoICI will coordinate the project. A PIU will be established within MoICI and will be
responsible for the overall coordination, implementation, and supervision of the project. The
PIU will be headed by a Project Coordinator who will report to the Minister of MoICI
through the Permanent Secretary.
50. A PIU will implement the project with support of a focal point forum. The PIU will be
assisted by a core project team composed of a Procurement and FM Specialist and a project
coordinator. The recruitment process for PIU staff is already launched under the PPA. The
PIU will be assisted by a project team called focal points forum, composed of one
representative from MoICI, Ministry of Finance (MoF), PURA, GAMTEL and the private
sector representing the SPV. The focal points are not consultants hired under the project but
rather staff of their respective institutions. The PIU will be in charge of:
(i) day-to-day activities under the project, in particular, procurement and monitoring
activities;
(ii) coordination with the other entities responsible for project implementation;
(iii) preparation of annual work programs, budgets, and procurement plans under the
project;
(iv) dissemination of internal and external audit reports; and
(v) Interaction with the World Bank for the requisite no objections of bidding
documents, RFPs and evaluation reports etc,
Procurement for key staff is at selection stage and being financed through the Project Preparation
Advance (PPA). In the interim the Integrated Financial Management and Information System
(IFMIS) PIU based at the Ministry of Finance is managing the PPA.
B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation
15
51. The PIU will monitor and evaluate the project. The PIU will bear the primary
responsibility for project Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of both project progress and
project outcomes, and, as such, will establish standard formats and guidelines for data
collection and reporting, and will organize training sessions for project stakeholders in their
use. The PIU will submit to the MoICI the M&E quarterly report that will include the
updated Results Framework and the Action Table, listing the corrective actions to be
implemented with deadlines and persons responsible clearly identified. The report will be
sent to the Bank for information.
52. The views of direct beneficiaries will be brought into the monitoring and evaluation
process. Comprehensive M&E reporting will be needed to monitor the results and
performance of the proposed project. It will involve mainly the direct beneficiaries of project
activities, but will be extended to other beneficiaries such as telecommunications operators
and private ICT firms, which ultimately are the main beneficiaries of the proposed project‟s
outcomes. The PIU will review and validate the reports on performance indicators and
recommend corrective actions if necessary. There will be focal points as to who will be
responsible for providing relevant information and monitoring progress, using relevant
performance indicators.
53. Implementation support missions will be conducted at least twice a year. The GoTG,
through the PIU, may perform evaluations jointly with the World Bank team and conduct
supervision or implementation support missions at least twice a year.
16
C. Sustainability
54. The GoTG is very committed to the project thus enhancing sustainability. On the policy
front, the GoTG continues to emphasize the aim of placing ICT at the center of its new
growth strategy, as clearly demonstrated in its 2010 ICT policy. Additional commitment to
telecommunications reform is clear in the GoTG‟s effort to adopt a new Communications
law, the ICT Act in 2009.
55. Legal and regulatory reforms are expected to have sustainable impact. Support for legal
and regulatory reform is expected to have a sustainable impact. Predictability and
transparency of the legal and regulatory framework that is conducive to private sector
participation and competition will increase the demand for affordable quality ICT services,
including advanced applications. Given that a number of private operators already exist in
the market and that there is potential for additional players beyond the wireless sector, it is
likely that the regulatory authority will have sufficient resources and capacity through
license and regulatory fees to become a self-funded institution and sustain the required
regulatory capacity to supervise sector development.
56. Improved coverage and prices will be sustained through the implementation of
advanced applications. Improved service coverage and quality at more competitive prices
for international connectivity and for data services will be sustained as it will create
opportunities for increased use and the introduction of advanced applications.
57. Local capacity will be strengthened through training and technical assistance. The
proposed project will make significant investments in capacity-building efforts through
training and technical assistance to build technical expertise, social capital, and knowledge.
With the focus on building sustainable capacity in key institutions such as the MoICI and
PURA, the benefits of the proposed project are expected to last far beyond project
completion as such capacity will support the creation of ICT policy and regulatory know-
how to guide sector growth and applications in the future.
V. Key Risks
58. Potential risks are summarized in the Operational Risk Assessment Framework (see Annex
IV). The overall project risks are rated MI. Risks identified are manageable and mitigation
measures are in place.
17
Table 4: Key risks and mitigation measures
VI. Appraisal Summary
A. Economic and Financial Analysis
59. Connecting to ACE will see The Gambia breakeven between 2019 and 2020, depending
on the wholesale price adopted, with an NPV to 2025 of US $26.3 million. Using the
same methodology that was developed for the economic and financial analysis of WARCIP
1-A, the IRR is 28.8% assuming an average bandwidth sale price of $100/Mbit/s/month, and
an IRR of 19.9%, assuming $50/Mbit/s/month. The latter figure is likely to be more
competitive and would stimulate more use11
, and takes into account bandwidth pricing
11
It can be noted that the investment in the cable is a „sunk‟ cost that provides an initial fixed 5.9Gbit/s of
bandwidth, so downstream prices can be reduced as much as possible to maximize use of this available capacity.
Main risks Mitigation measures
Inadequate interest from Private
sector to finance connectivity PPPs
PPA approved to support PPP structures that will make it attractive for
private investment. Promise of liberalizing the international gateway
increases private sector appetite. Private sector already signaled significant
interest under transparent conditions. The legal expert hired under the PPA
is currently working with the different stakeholders to finalize the PPP
arrangements ahead of project effectiveness.
Delays in Government
implementation of divestiture of
SPV shares to private operators
Targeted support will be provided under PPA to guide the process and
ensure success.
Delays in implementation of
reforms including liberalization of
the international gateway
TA activities will be provided to address liberalization issues. Commitments
on opening up the sector and securing an enabling environment are being
discussed and addressed through Technical Assistance support and possible
inclusion in DPO under preparation.
Potential "veto" by existing private
licensees and government operators
over different aspects of the
program.
Detailed due diligence to identify incentives for existing operators to
willingly participate in the proposed infrastructure is included under this
project.
Limited institutional capacity TA program to create and sustain capacity included both in the PPA as well
as in component 2 of the project
Difficulties changing ACE CMA
signatory and handing over rights
and responsibilities of GAMTEL to
new SPVs
Initial TA provided for The Gambia already outlined a process for the
discussion with ACE. During the Lisbon Management Committee Meeting,
GAMTEL initiated the discussion on the change of signatory rights with the
other ACE members.
Risk of delays could result in
penalty to clients for missing ACE
payment milestone
Both the Bank and the GoTG are discussing with ACE Consortium
flexibility of installment payments.
Project commercially not viable
due to insufficient demand for
services
Early results of traffic assessment confirm viability. Detailed traffic study
will be conducted and Demand stimulating approaches will be explored
under the project
.Risk of national backbone not
materializing for lack of financing
from other donors
Financing secured for the backbone from the Islamic Development Bank.
The project will support the Government to put in place legal and regulatory
safeguards for open access to the backbone including support for structural
separation of GAMTELs wholesale and retail activities.
18
trends in other regions such as East Africa. The final breakeven year will depend on actual
capacity uptake and the wholesale price of bandwidth. After 2023 at the latest, the project
would be cash-flow positive and substantial revenues would be made if these wholesale
pricing levels are maintained. Investment data was calculated based on a discount rate of
15%. On this basis, membership in ACE, if accompanied by robust regulation by PURA to
ensure competitive pricing releases demand, has potential to provide low cost international
access to a broad range of the population.
60. Joining ACE represents the most cost-effective and effective way to improve
international telecommunication access in The Gambia. Countries and their companies'
decision to join ACE is the result of an analytical process comparing available and potential
connectivity options. The World Bank commissioned a due diligence review of the process
followed to reach the decision to join ACE. The due diligence confirms that it was in line
with the principle of efficiency, transparency and adherence to good practice in the industry,
when considering options of buying satellite capacity or joining submarine cable consortia.
Analysis of other possible options for improving international connectivity clearly shows
that connecting to other cables or satellites would ultimately result in a less compelling
business case than connection through ACE. Cables like MainOne and SAT-3/WASC did
not include proposed landing stations in The Gambia. The option of obtaining further
satellite capacity to connect The Gambia to satellite was also analyzed, but the significantly
lower bandwidth costs obtained through ACE compensate for the higher investment and
maintenance cost.
61. The project will increase access to internet, create jobs, improve education
opportunities and public administration and increase government revenues. The
Project will bring significant benefits to The Gambia in a number of ways including (i)
increased public access to Internet services (ii) a broad range of social benefits through
increased labor productivity, employment creation, learning opportunities for youth,
participation by women in the labor market, and improved public administration (iii) greater
fiscal returns due to new sources of revenue for the GoTG. It must be noted, however, that
the economic and financial benefits of a technical assistance component is generally difficult
to quantify because of the inadequacy of data available at the outset.
B. Technical
62. The proposed project recognizes that infrastructure and policy environment
bottlenecks need to be dismantled to ensure better communications access. Technical
design of the project reflects lessons learned in the ICT sector and international best
practices. For most developing countries, a major obstacle to the uptake of ICT remains the
lack of adequate access to ICT infrastructure. A lack of investment in ICT infrastructure and
access networks, coupled with inefficient provision of services, are the most important
factors undermining the development of networked economies. The main lesson derived is
that success is mainly market driven. Creating a predictable legal and policy environment is
key to improving investor confidence and restoring trust in the ICT sector. The focus of the
proposed project is to create a PPP framework for international connectivity. The project
will establish an enabling institutional and regulatory environment to help attract and sustain
investment in the telecommunications sector.
19
63. The ACE consortium is deemed to be technically qualified and structured according to
best practice in the industry. The team‟s assessment is that the ACE consortium is being
structured in a manner consistent with international good practices in the industry, and is led
by major industry players. Given the experience of key consortium members in designing,
commissioning and operating submarine cables, the implementation risk is minimal. As with
all cables, there is, however, a risk of breaks in the operational system.
64. Legal due diligence on ACE has been conducted for transactional and regulatory
aspects: The Construction and Maintenance Agreement (C&MA) permits certain transfers
of parties‟ rights in certain circumstances. In other circumstances, transfers would require to
be made possible either in a specific amendment to the C&MA permitting GAMTEL to
transfer its rights to a SPV or by obtaining the consent of the parties. The ACE C&MA
permits a party to transfer its interest (without the other parties‟ consent) to (i) a subsidiary
(>50%), (ii) an entity that controls it (>50%), or (iii) a sister company (i.e., an entity
controlled by the same entity as controls the original party (>50%)).
65. Regulatory Issues. The main issues are ensuring “open access” (fair and transparent
pricing) to the capacity provided by the ACE cable at the domestic level once the capacity
comes on shore, as well as ensuring full liberalization of the international gateway. This is
primarily a domestic regulatory issue. A review of the agreement indicates transparent
access to known capacity at known prices. A review of sector regulatory framework,
including licensing conditions, will be conducted at the national level. As indicated above,
the PPA was designed to include technical assistance to support these activities
C. Financial Management
66. A financial management assessment of the PIU of the WARCIP Project under the
oversight of the MoICI implementing the project was conducted. The conclusion of the
assessment is that financial management arrangements in MoICI have to be set up and do not
yet meet the Bank‟s minimum requirements under OP/BP10.02. The overall fiduciary risk
rating is assessed as Substantial (Medium Impact). Once mitigation measures included in the
action plan are implemented, the FM risk is expected to be moderate (Medium Likelihood).
67. The project financial management is weakened by a number of factors. These include :
(i) lack of fiduciary function: the FM staff is not yet in place and there is not a FM manual
and an accounting software, (ii) non-familiarity of the staff and the Ministry of Information
and Communication with IDA financed-projects and FM procedures, (iii) weak internal
control environment and low capacity of the national internal audit unit.
68. Mitigation measures have been identified: To mitigate the country and entity risks, i) a
new stand-alone PIU will have the overall FM responsibility on the project and will work
with Focal Points in charge of technical execution of the different components. (ii) A
Financial Management Officer with competence and experience satisfactory to the Bank will
be recruited to set up the fiduciary function. (iii) A computerized financial and accounting
system will be set up (iv) A consultant will carry out ex-post audits of the project with TORs
20
acceptable for IDA and will issue a quarterly report basis for strengthening the project
internal control environment within the first two years.
D. Procurement
69. IDA funding for component 1 (a) on international connectivity does not go towards a
procurable item subject to compliance with World Bank procurement guidelines. This
is because such funding is for membership fees (paid in different installments) against a set
of rights including use of a certain amount of capacity at preferred rates and a share of
ownership of an indivisible cable infrastructure asset.
70. For other project components (component 1b, components 2 and 3), IDA procurement
guidelines will apply and procurement activities will be carried out by the PIU to be created
in MoICI. This PIU will be staffed by a Project Coordinator, a Procurement Specialist, a
Financial Management Specialist and an accountant. Meanwhile, the fiduciary function for
WARCIP PPA is entrusted to the IFMIS project team at the MoF. This team comprises a
qualified procurement specialist who has both the technical expertise and the experience
necessary to carry out the procurement activities envisaged under the project and has been
recruited on a competitive basis for a part time position.
71. A procurement assessment has been carried out. An assessment of the capacity of the
MoICI to implement procurement actions for the project has been carried out on March 21st,
2011. The assessment reviewed the organizational structure for implementing the project.
72. The Procurement risk of the project is substantial. Risks have been identified and
mitigation measures agreed as detailed in Annex 3.
E. Social and Environment
73. Connection to the ACE cable is not expected to have significant environmental and
social impact. The proposed project is rated as a Category B project. The safeguards policy
triggered are Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01), Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04), Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) and Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12). The
cable system is likely to have a submerged or „wet plant‟ part, and a „dry plant‟ part which
interfaces at proposed Landing Stations. The Landing Station is the location where a
submarine or other underwater cable makes landfall. The landing (or termination) station
can also be the point at which the submarine cable connects into the land-based
infrastructure or network. Sections of the cable (particularly both wet and dry plants of each
country‟s lateral connection to the main cable) lie within the territorial waters of the landing
parties while remaining sections lie in international waters, normally in deep seas. The
lateral connecting cable to Banjul connects to the main cable well beyond the 2500 m
isobath. Deep ocean fiber optic cables are no larger than 17-21 mm diameter – about the size
of a domestic garden hose- and are laid mainly upon the surface of the ocean floor.
74. . The final site of the Landing Station is already identified and the Environmental and
Social Management Plan (ESMP) has been prepared, consulted upon, and disclosed
before appraisal. This project will affect less than 50 persons and therefore, the equivalent
21
of an abbreviated Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan (RRP), has been prepared, consulted
upon, and disclosed before appraisal, It provides a plan for the management of the few
resettlement issues which have been identified, even though these may seem to be of minor
significance (see Annex 3 for further details).
75. OP/BP 7.50-on “Projects on International Waterways” does not apply. While the main
cables are to be placed in non-territorial, deep sea locations, OP/BP 7.50, Projects on
International Waterways, does not apply. The types of waterways covered under the policy
do not contemplate an “open sea.” For purposes of the policy, international waterways
include semi-enclosed coastal waters, closed seas, national rivers flowing into those waters,
and transboundary groundwater12
.
76. The proposed project is expected to have positive social benefits. The main social
impacts of the proposed project are the increased possibility of better access to ICT services
for the population and improved GoTG service delivery. The project will contribute to (i)
enabling ICT to become a driver for sustainable economic growth; (ii) enabling the GoTG to
use ICT to improve services; (iii) improving access and quality of ICT services for the
general population, businesses, and the Government; and (iv)reducing isolation and enhance
economic activities in rural areas.
F. Legal conditions and covenants
77. Effectiveness conditions:
(a) The execution and delivery, on behalf of the Recipient, of the Construction and
Maintenance Agreement, in form and substance satisfactory to the Association, and
containing no prohibition of divestiture of the Recipient‟s shareholding, has been duly
authorized or ratified by all necessary governmental or corporate action.
(b) The SPV has been duly created, registered and made operational in the territory of the
Recipient, including through the appointment of its director general and the adoption of
its shareholders‟ agreement and its by-laws, in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association.
(c) With GAMTEL‟s acquiescence, the ACE Consortium has transferred to the SPV all the
rights and obligations of GAMTEL in the Construction and Maintenance Agreement and
has fully substituted GAMTEL with the SPV as the member of the ACE Consortium.
(d) The Contractual Arrangement, in form and substance satisfactory to the Association, has
been entered into between the Recipient and the SPV.
(e) The Recipient shall have established the PIU under terms of reference and with staff in
numbers and with qualifications satisfactory to the Association. As part of such staffing,
there shall be in place for the PIU: (i) the project coordinator; and (ii) a financial
12
It should be noted that the definition of international waterways under the policy is at variance with the definitions
under the rules established by the International Law Association, as well as the United Nations Convention on the
Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Waters Watercourses
22
management specialist and a procurement specialist, all of them under terms of reference
and with qualifications and experience satisfactory to the Association.
(f) The Recipient shall have adopted the Project Implementation Manual in form and substance
satisfactory to the Association
Disbursement Conditions:
78. Set up a computerized financial and accounting system for the Project for disbursements for
component 1.b, 2 and 3
Legal covenants:
1. The Recipient shall take all action necessary on its behalf: (i) to carry out the RRP with due
diligence and efficiency and at all times provide the funds necessary therefore; (ii) to adequately monitor
and evaluate the carrying out of the activities provided in the RRP in the carrying out of the Project and in
the contracts to be concluded for the construction of the landing station there under; and (iii) to maintain
the Association suitably informed of the progress in the implementation of the RRP.
2. The Recipient shall take all measures necessary to carry out the Environmental and Social
Management Plan with due diligence and efficiency, ensuring that adequate information on the
implementation the mitigation measures to be implemented to minimize any potential negative impact
under the Project is suitably included in the Project Reports to be prepared pursuant to the provisions of
the Financing Agreement.
3. The Recipient shall: (i) not later than three (3) months after the Effective Date, initially recruit a
consultant to perform a quarterly review of the internal control system for the Project; and (ii) not later
than four (4) months after the Effective Date, recruit an external auditor for the PIU, both on the basis of
terms of reference and with qualifications and experience satisfactory to the Association.
4. The Recipient shall take all action required: (i) to ensure the proceeds of the Grant allocated from
time to time to component 1.1 are transferred to the SPV in an efficient and timely manner; and (ii) to
have in place a suitable legal framework to ensure the Grant is used for the intended purposes
23
Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring
THE GAMBIA
WARCIP 1B
PDO: To increase the geographical reach of broadband networks and reduce costs of communications services in The Gambia
Program/Project DO Level Results
Indicators*
Co
re Unit of
Measure
Baseline
2010
Cumulative Target Values**
Frequency Data Source/
Methodology
Responsibility
for Data
Collection
YR 1 YR 2 YR3 YR 4 YR 5
Indicator One: Volume of international
traffic: International Communications
(Internet, Telecoms, and Data)
bandwidth
In Kbit/s
per person
10
[Dec 2010)
10 10 39 30 30 Annual SPV PURA/PIU
Indicator Two: Access to internet
services (number of subscribers per 100
people)
Number
per 100
0.75
[Sept.
2010]
1 1.6 2.4 3.0 3.0 6 months Operators PURA/PIU
Indicator three : average monthly price
of wholesale international E1 capacity
link from capital city to Europe
US$/
month/2M
bit/s
$5,000
[Dec
2010]
Less than
$ 5,000
Less than
$ 4,000
Less than
$ 2,000
Less than
$ 1,000
Less than
$ 1,000
Yearly Operators PURA/PIU
Indicator four : Direct project
beneficiaries, of which female13
Number,
%
1.6 m
44%
[Sep
2010]
1.620
45%
1.650
45%
1.680
48%
1.8 million
51%
1.8 million
51%
Annual Survey14 PIU
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS
Intermediate Result (Component One):
Intermediate Result indicator One:
Volume of available international
capacity: International Communications
(Internet, Telecoms, and Data)
bandwidth
In Gbit/s 0.155 0.155 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 yearly PURA PURA
Intermediate Result indicator One:
Retail price of internet services (per
US$/month $1,500 $1,500 $1,000 Less than
700
Less than 500 Less than 500 yearly Operators PURA/PIU
13 Direct Project Beneficiaries are defined in section II paragraph 27 of the core text. Number of active fixed and mobile subscribers (internet subscribers not counted to avoid double counting. Assumes % female on a pro-rata
basis using publicly available ratio in the total population.
14 The Direct Project Beneficiaries survey will be coordinated by MoICI and will use different stakeholders of the ICT sector to collect information from a representative sample of beneficiaries.
24
Mbit/s per Month, in US$)
Intermediate Result (Component Two):
Intermediate Result indicator One:
Impact on Telecom sector of World
Bank technical assistance (composite
score)
1-low
impact to
5 –high
impact
0 1 2 3 3 3 yearly
25
Annex 2: Detailed Project Description
THE GAMBIA
WARCIP 1B
1. WARCIP -The Gambia will have three components. WARCIP The Gambia will have 3 components (i)
Infrastructure component to improve connectivity ii) Technical Assistance component to create enabling
environment, and (iii) implementation support.
Component 1 – Supporting Connectivity (US$25.75 million)
2. The main focus of the project is to connect The Gambia to ACE. Improving international connectivity
through funding access to ACE submarine cable is the main focus of WARCIP The Gambia. Other
connectivity priorities are treated as a secondary focus.
a) International connectivity: US$24.5 million
3. Connecting to ACE represents a unique window of opportunity. For purposes of international
connectivity along the coast of West Africa and with the rest of the world, the most attractive and
efficient viable option for The Gambia is to connect to the ACE project, which is anticipated to be an
approximately 17,000 km submarine cable system. The Cable system will connect 23 countries between
South Africa and Europe, including a landing station in The Gambia. In all likelihood, there are no other
opportunities for The Gambia to connect to another submarine cable for many years to come. Analysis has
confirmed that other submarine cable projects under preparation in the region are not viable options for
The Gambia. 15
4. In total The Gambia will pay US$25 million for a 2.8% share of total cable capacity. The total
estimated cost of the ACE submarine cable is around US$700 million based on the final basic system
configuration with 23 landing points and is to be operational in 2012. On June 5, 2010, the Government
of The Gambia (GoTG) signed the ACE Construction and Maintenance Agreement (C&MA) of the ACE
consortium via GAMTEL and committed to paying its contribution of US$25 million. The GoTG has paid
for the first three instalments of the ACE cable (a total of US$7.5 million) and is now seeking support
from the Bank to cover the remaining payments, as neither the incumbent nor the GoTG is in a position to
cover the full cost without concessional financing. Complete membership will ensure that a cable landing
station is constructed in Banjul and that The Gambia thereby gains access to the international
telecommunications capacity to be made available by ACE‟s planned submarine fiber optic cable.
5. Discussion with operators revealed high level of interest from the private sector (both from mobile
operators and from Internet Service Providers) to co-finance the landing station and to be
associated with operating and managing the facility and related international capacity. The
remaining GoTG shares will be made available to other parties under a divestment plan. Original
shareholders of the SPV could also be offered the opportunity to increase their shares and acquire
additional capacity. The initial shareholding structure includes participation from GAMTEL (30%),
15
Mike Jensen Report entitled „International Connectivity Options for The Gambia, Liberia and Guinea‟ for the World Bank (May
2010).
26
Private operators (51%) and Government (19%). Private sector will start with minimum equity and will
increase it as they make investment in capacity in the cable.
6. Part of the remaining Government shares in the SPV will be converted to capacity purchase- Pre-
purchase discounted bandwidth for ministries and designated institutions will be implemented as the need
arises. GoTG could consider making payments for the cost of obtaining discounted price for Internet
capacity (Internet access). In return for obtaining this advance from GoTG, the SPV would provide
subsidized capacity to specific ministries and / or institutions to be designated from time to time by
GoTG. Price paid by the designated ministries and institutions for this service would be a discounted
price, lower than the normal wholesale or retail price for broadband capacity, possibly equal to the actual
costs of operation of the SPV during the period in which the capacity is provided. Service level agreement
and associate legal and regulatory instruments will be developed under the project to ensure the success of
this activity.
7. The GoTG intends to divest its remaining shares to new entrants. This divestment approach will be
supported by the project. Existing operators could be given the right of first refusal to increase their
existing capacity following few years of operation of the cable.
Regional connectivity (US$1.25 million)
8. Broadband will be provided to improve priority services. While international fiber links could potentially
facilitate better and cheaper access to communications in The Gambia, the full benefits of this access
cannot be achieved without further investments in national infrastructure and effective use of ICT for
critical services.
9. The GoTG has expressed interest in the development of high speed government virtual private networks
for selected institutions within Banjul. The United National Development Programme (UNDP) has
provided some resources to undertake an initial needs assessment of these institutions. It is expected that
World Bank funding will leverage this preliminary work.
10. IDA resources will therefore be used to fund a national Internet Exchange Point (IXP). This would likely
include the hosting of shared time-servers, local Domain Name Servers (DNS) and caching servers. A
fully functional Internet Exchange could help The Gambia to exchange traffic locally, and avoid paying
high bandwidth prices.
11. It is expected that the GoTG will complement IDA resources for the purpose of additional national
broadband infrastructure by investing the proceeds from the sale of GoTG shares in the SPV. Resources
from the PPA are helping to develop the framework, plans and support for the divestiture.
12. In order to create more demand for the capacity and ensure better connection to its neighbours, GoTG
intends to use part of the funding under this component to undertake a detailed feasibility study for a fiber
link to Guinea Bissau. The study will identify funding needs as well as business plan for financing and
managing the link with possible financing from the proceeds from Private Participants in the SPV.
13. IDA resources will be further complemented by funding projected to come from the IsDB, for additional
national and cross-border infrastructure in The Gambia. The IsDB funding is expected to be made in
parallel and likely to finance terrestrial broadband backbone fiber networks and broadband connections
27
within and between The Gambia and its neighbours. The Bank is working closely with the IsDB to ensure
that open access principles apply to all communication infrastructure financed under both projects.
Component 2- Creating an Enabling Environment for improved connectivity (US$7.25 million)
14. Support to optimize the governance, ownership and financing issues related to the operation of the
landing station and provision of networks and services emanating from the ACE cable. This
component will provide Technical Assistance (TA) and the capacity building necessary to support the
successful implementation of Component 1 of the project. Specifically, Component 2 will focus on the
transaction design and operating model for ownership and management of international, regional and
national infrastructure using PPP frameworks consistent with open access principles to create an enabling
environment for improved connectivity.16
The PPP frameworks will focus on principles of open and non-
discriminatory access while maximizing the role of the private sector. This component will also include
the strengthening of the policy and regulatory environment to promote further sector reform in order to
maximize benefits from access to international capacity and liberalized international gateway. The
creation of a new Broadband policy as well as a strategy to stimulate bandwidth demand will be supported
given the high capacity that will enter the country. Most of the activities under enabling environment are
included as part of the PPA.
15. Specifically the following activities will be implemented.
(i) Support to optimize the governance, ownership and financing issues related to the operation of
the landing station and provision of networks and services emanating from the ACE cable.
Under this activity legal and financial advisory services will be provided to put in place an optimal
structure for the landing station and access to the cable capacity. Those services will include (i) designing
and negotiating instruments and contracts and related stakeholders‟ agreements, (ii) defining the rights
and obligation of different equity stakeholders (Government, GAMTEL, private operators etc.), and (iii)
defining appropriate risk sharing and commensurate financial rewards between parties.
16. Because of the urgency to secure participation in the ACE cable and lead time needed to put in place the
structure for ownership and management of the landing station, the proposed approach is to have
Government take a controlling position on an interim basis while the final management arrangements are
being finalized. This activity will support the GoTG to put in place the divestiture strategy for
Government shareholding. In particular it will define the scope of the exit clauses, valuation of public
shares, as well as timing and transition process for divestiture.
(ii) Legal and regulatory safeguards for open access including gateway liberalization
17. This activity will finance a detailed assessment of current legal and regulatory framework and
identification of needed reforms to ensure open and non discriminatory access to cable landing facility
and associated cable capacity, including issues related to licensing of SPV: international gateway
facilities, fully liberalized international gateway (landing station), open access regime (national and
international backbone essential facilities), wholesale price cap control mechanism and quality
outsourcing of O&M. The detailed development of instruments will be conducted under the project. The
PPA financed the assessment and the action plan and Government policy statement. Additional support
16
Open access is broadly defined as an equal opportunity for operators to have unfettered access to given infrastructure or services
under similar terms and conditions
28
for full implementation will be secured under the project. The project will also support establishing an
open access regime for the national backbone infrastructure that will be financed through IsDB resources.
Support will include regulation of wholesale pricing and needed regulatory safeguards for open access.
(iii) Broadband policy and demand stimulation strategy and implementation support
18. This activity will support the GoTG to have a comprehensive policy to promote broadband use in Gambia
to facilitate uptake of demand and applications using the capacity that will be available to Gambia
following ACE landing. The policy and strategy will target a number of areas including additional
infrastructure requirements within the country, regulatory actions for broadband development, priority
areas where applications are likely to pick up. The activity will include specific implementation support.
The policy and strategy will target a number of areas including additional infrastructure requirements
within the country, regulatory actions for broadband development, priority areas where applications are
likely to pick up. The activity will also include specific implementation support on a pilot basis to
implement transformative applications in key areas. This could include programs to connect schools,
university, hospitals and or targeted support to areas of significant growth potential in The Gambia like
tourism, agriculture, etc. The priorities will be identified and validated under the demand stimulation
study.
(iv) Implementation support for Strategic repositioning of GAMTEL
19. This component will assist the company with options and strategy for improving the efficiency,
productivity, customer service delivery, and provide technical and capacity building support to facilitate
overall financial and operational performance. GAMTEL currently depends for much of its revenue on the
high international voice termination and outgoing rates it is able to charge as the sole /monopoly gateway.
As this revenue stream is expected to disappear when the international gateway is liberalised GAMTEL
will need to become more efficient and responsive to operator concerns, implement Service Level
Agreements and improve service levels.
(v) Strengthening the regulatory function of PURA, the regulator
20. Under this component five activities will be supported (i) development of a regulatory and organizational
action plan for PURA, (ii) development of key regulatory instruments in a number of areas related to
licensing reform, spectrum reform, quality of service, enforcement, consumer protection, cost based
pricing, interconnection numbering, (iii) conducting studies on license fees and taxation for the sector to
guide sector reforms, mobile number portability and definition of significant market power (iv) support to
implement structural separation between wholesale and retail markets and (v) capacity building and skill
strengthening in areas related to wholesale market regulation, PPP framework and other emerging
regulatory issues. Capacity building could take several forms including study tours, twinning
arrangements, workshops, etc
(vi) Support for MoICI on key policy issues and building its capacity:
21. The project will support the MoICI in three key activities related to (i) development of a communications
Infrastructure strategy looking at financing and management models for infrastructure in general and
backbone in particular that foster open and competitive access and guarantee lower ICT pricing to end
users, (ii) development of policy and institutional framework for Top level domain name and (iii)
Providing support to the MoICI to put in place cyber-security (including access to and freedom of
29
information, data protection and privacy, e-transactions and authentication, cybercrime and related issues)
for national and cross-border data communications. The project will also include capacity building
support to the ministry through training, study tours and hiring of advisors.
Component 3: Project implementation, communications and M&E including contingency (US$ 2
million).
22. This component will include support for setting up the PIU, support for environmental studies,
communications and M&E as well as initial support to the SPV that will manage the landing station.
23. A PIU will be established within the MoICI and will be responsible for the overall coordination,
implementation, and supervision of the project. The PIU will be headed by a project coordinator who will
report to the Minister. The PIU will be assisted by a core project team composed of a Procurement and
external Financial Management Specialist and representatives from the MoICI. The PIU will be in charge of
(i) day-to-day activities under the project, in particular, procurement and monitoring activities; (ii)
coordination with the other entities responsible for project implementation; (iii) preparation of annual work
programs, budgets, and procurement plans under the project; (iv) dissemination of internal and external
audit reports; and (v) implementation of their recommendations.
24. Environmental studies This activity included funding and disclosure of environmental studies prior to
appraisal of the project. Specifically an Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs and a
Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan (RRP). It also includes activities related to monitoring and
implementation of the said instruments, through hiring part time environmental consultant to the PIU.
25. Communications and M&E support. The PIU will recruit or designate a person responsible for M&E,
based on the capacity assessment of the PIU staff right after project effectiveness. More specifically, the
person responsible for M&E will liaise with all the project‟s stakeholders (through designated focal
points) to gather relevant information and data regularly. Additional activities would include conducting
the surveys to ensure a good monitoring and evaluation of the project. The project will also cover the
costs related to communications strategy for the project and implementation of the strategy to reach out to
the public and increase awareness of the project.
26. Initial support to the SPV: The project will provide initial support to SPV to cover immediate cost related
to its set up as well as to hire a local legal expert to help with the legal paperwork related to the SPV.
30
Annex 3: Implementation Arrangements
THE GAMBIA
WARCIP 1B
I. Project administration mechanisms
1. The proposed project will be implemented under the aegis of MoICI. Implementation arrangements
involve creation of a Project Implementation Unit (PIU) that will be supported by five Focal Points. The
PIU will be headed by a Project Coordinator who will report to the Minister through the Permanent
Secretary.
Figure 3.1 Implementation diagram
The PIU will be composed of
A project coordinator
A procurement specialist
A financial management specialist
An accountant
Support staff
PIU
MOICIFocal Point
MoF Focal Point
PURA Focal Point
SPV focal Point
GAMTELFocal Point
Minister
Permanent Secretary
31
2. The PIU will also hire M&E consultant and environmental and social specialist on a part time basis to
ensure good implementation of safeguards instruments developed under the project. The process of hiring
the project team started under the PPA. The FM and accountant position are at short listing stage, the
procurement position is already filled. The Terms of Reference (ToRs) for the project coordinator position
has been advertised.
3. The PIU will serve as the Grant Administrator of the project and will handle all administrative matters in
accordance with the Project Implementation Manual (PIM) that is currently under preparation by MoICI
under the PPA. It will also ensure financial management and handle project disbursements, and include
the preparation and submission of replenishment requests to IDA. The Unit will also be responsible for
(i) maintaining an Management Information System (MIS) for tracking progress in all project
subcomponents, both in terms of financial performance and meeting implementation targets and monitor
the performance of all contractors under the project; (ii) preparing annual work programs and budgets,
and if necessary, reviewing, in consultation with IDA, the reallocation of resources across the various
components of the project as lessons emerge as to patterns of demand and development impact.
Development of the PIM and establishment of the MIS will be financed under the PPA. The new PIU will
work closely with the IFMIS PIU handling the PPA to ensure a smooth transition.
4. The PIU will be assisted by a task team composed of five focal points.
o Focal point recommended by the Minister MoICI on issues related to policy matters and overall
coordination of the project;
o Focal point recommended by PURA on issues related to regulatory component
o Focal point recommended by GAMTEL on issues related to GAMTEL support
o Focal Point designated by MoF for issues related to the SPV.
o Focal point from the private sector designated by the SPV for issues related to component 1 (a)
5. The focal point will be responsible for facilitating activities related to their respective components,
including developing ToR and draft procurement documents, and will be the focal points for monitoring
progress of their components and for collecting and updating indicators for the components they manage. The
focal points are not hired under the project as consultants. They are nominated by their respective entities to
ensure effective implementation. The PIM will detail their respective roles and responsibilities.
32
II. Financial Management, Disbursements and Procurement
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
6. The objective of the Financial Management Assessment is to determine whether the implementing unit
of the WARCIP Project under the oversight of MoICI has acceptable financial management arrangements in
place to take on the project‟s fiduciary responsibility. These arrangements include accounting system and
reporting, auditing, and internal controls. The financial management arrangements of the implementing unit
are acceptable if: (i) it is capable of recording correctly all transactions and activities; (ii) it supports the
preparation of regular and reliable financial statements; (iii) it safeguards its assets, and (iv) it is subjected to a
satisfactory auditing process. The assessment complied with the Financial Management Manual for World
Bank-Financed Investment Operations that became effective on March 1, 2010. It is worth noting that the PPA
is being managed on an interim basis under IFMIS PIU established under the MoF. An assessment of this PIU
has been conducted and confirmed the interim PIU meets OP 10.02 requirements.
7. The GoTG has set in place an IFMIS software for public funds. The software can be extended to
projects and can capture project transactions and generate a general ledger. For example, the FM team of the
IFMIS Project can process the project‟s transactions on line in a separate ledger account and keep the project
bank accounts. But, IFMIS software is not fully customized to generate directly from system adequate
financial reports: quarterly reports, budget execution report, automated bank reconciliations and annual
financial statements. During The Gambia CPPR held on April 7, 2011, the IFMIS IT team committed to
configure IFMIS in a short term in order to cover all financial management aspects. So, it can be reasonable to
expect a full functional computerized financial management system before WARCIP effectiveness. For more
assurance, an application should be set as back up and will be used for producing financial reports on basis of
the general ledger generate from the IFMIS Software.
8. Payments to ACE will be made directly by the Project to ACE under direct disbursement. Setting up of a
fully functional financial computerized system will be a disbursement condition for components 1.b, 2 and 3.
Payments under component 1 (membership fee to ACE) will not have setting up the accounting system as a
disbursement condition.
9. In order to meet the ACE payment schedule, the GoTG covered a number of payments to ACE from the
National Budget. The project will cover a total of US$ 7million under retroactive financing to allow the
Government to recover the amounts paid.
Funds flow and disbursement arrangements
Disbursement methods
10. Disbursements under the Grant would be transaction based. Direct Payment and Statement of
Expenditures (SOE) methods will apply as appropriate. The conversion to report-based disbursements may be
envisaged when the PIU has capacity to produce acceptable IFRs. IDA will authorize an advance to the
designated account of the PIU. Funds will be used to honor eligible expenditures. The minimum value of
Direct Payment and Special Commitment will be 20 % of the designated account ceiling.
11. The project will submit on a monthly basis a Bank statement and a reconciliation of the designated
account, together with the withdrawal applications. All supporting documentation for SOEs will be retained at
the PIU and must be made available for periodic review by Bank‟ missions and external auditors.
33
Designated Account
12. The designated account will be located in the Central Bank and managed by the PIU. The currency of
the designated account will be the US Dollars and the allocation will cover approximately four months of
expenditures. The Designated Account will be managed according to the disbursement procedures described
in the Administrative, Accounting and Financial Procedures Manual and Disbursement Letter.
Withdrawal of Proceeds
Table 3.1: Withdrawal of Proceeds
Category
Amount of the
Grant Allocated
(expressed in US$)
Percentage of
Expenditures to be
Financed
(inclusive of Taxes)
(1) Consortium Fees under Part
1.1 of the Project
24,500,000 100%
(2) Goods, works, services
(consultants‟ and non-
consulting), training and
workshops under the Project,
and Operational Costs
8,500,000 100%
(3) Refund of Preparation
Advance No. Q758-GM
2,000,000 Amount payable
pursuant to Section
2.07 of the General
Conditions
TOTAL AMOUNT 35,000,000
In application of the Country Financing Parameters for The Gambia, all expenditures will be financed at 100 %.
Budgeting arrangements
13. The budgeting process will be clearly defined in the FM Procedures Manual and will be adopted by
Ministry of Information and Communications Infrastructure before the beginning of the year. Each Focal Point
and the Project Coordinator will prepare budget related to their respective component. The project
consolidated budget will be submitted to the IDA‟s no objection.
Accounting policies and procedures
34
14. Project accounts will be maintained on a cash basis, supported with appropriate records and procedures
to track commitments and to safeguard assets. Annual financial statements will be prepared by the PIU in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Internal control
15. The FM manual will be set out with a clear description of the approval and authorization processes and
internal controls and should be approved by the MoICI or their representative.
Reporting and Monitoring
16. The PIU would prepare Interim Un-audited Financial Reports (IFRs) on a quarterly basis and submit
copies to the World Bank within 45 days following the end the calendar quarter. The IFR will include sources
and uses of funds by project expenditures classification. It will also include a comparison of budgeted and
actual project expenditures (commitment and disbursement) to date and for the quarter.
17. The PIU will produce Annual Financial Statements, and these statements will comply with The Gambia
and World Bank requirements. These Financial Statements 17
will comprise of:
a Statement of Sources and Uses of Funds,
a Statement of Commitments,
Accounting Policies Adopted and Explanatory Notes,
a Management Assertion that project funds have been expended for the intended purposes as
specified in the relevant financing agreements
Audit arrangements
Internal Audit
18. Internal audit function for the project will be assumed by a consultant who will carry out ex-post audits
within the oversight of the MoICI or their representative. The capacity of the Gambian internal audit unit will
also be developed through the CFAA‟s action plan in order to perform ex-post audits for this project.
External audit
19. The Financing Agreement will require the submission of Audited Financial Statements for the PIU to
IDA within six months after year-end. External auditor with qualification and experience satisfactory to the
World Bank will be appointed to conduct an annual audit of the project‟s financial statements. A single
opinion on the Audited Project Financial Statements in compliance with International Standards on Auditing
(ISA) will be required.
20. The external auditors will prepare a Management Letter giving observations and comments, and
providing recommendations for improvements in accounting records, systems, controls and compliance with
financial covenants in the Financing Agreement.
The table below summarizes the auditing requirements:
17
It should be noted that the project financial statements should be all inclusive and cover all sources and uses of funds and not only those provided through IDA funding. It thus reflects all program activities, financing, and expenditures, including funds from other development partners.
35
Table 3.2: Auditing report dates
Audit report Due Date
Financial Statements
Management letter
End of June
Financial Management Action Plan
Table 3.3: Financial Management Action Plan
ACTION When By whom
1. Appoint a Financial Management Officer to handle FM
and accounting activities:
PIU Process of appointment started By negotiation (Done)
Financial management officer appointed By effectiveness
2. Set up a computerized financial and accounting system By disbursements for
component 1.b, 2 and 3
PIU
3. Prepare and adopt the administrative, financial and
accounting procedures manual in the PIU
By effectiveness PIU
4. External Audit
PIU Draft the ToR for the financial audit of the Project By the negotiation
Selection of the auditor 4 months after effectiveness
5. Internal Audit
PIU
Draft the ToR for internal audit to be performed
by a consultant
By the negotiation
Selection of the consultant to perform quarterly
review
3 months after effectiveness
Conclusion of the assessment
21. The conclusion of the assessment is that financial management arrangements in MoICI have to be set up
and do not yet meet the Bank‟s minimum requirements under OP/BP10.02. The overall fiduciary risk rating is
assessed as Substantial (Medium Impact). Once mitigation measures included in the action plan are
implemented, the FM risk is expected to be moderate (Medium Likelihood).
PROCUREMENT
A) General
22. Procurement for the proposed project under components 1b, 2 and 3 will be carried out in
accordance with the Procurement Guidelines: Guidelines of Goods, Works and Non-consulting
Services under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants by World Bank Borrowers of January
2011. The general description of various items under different expenditure category is described below.
For each contract to be financed by the Grant, the different procurement methods or consultant selection
methods, the need for prequalification, estimated costs, prior review requirements, and time frame are
agreed between the Borrower and the Bank project team in the Procurement Plan. The Procurement Plan
will be updated at least annually or as required to reflect the actual project implementation needs and
improvements in institutional capacity.
36
23. A Country Procurement Assessment Review carried out in The Gambia in October 1998, flagged
the main issues such as the lack of capacity regarding the Recipient's staff, the absence of standard
bidding documents at the national level, the insufficient capacity of local contractors for contracts
subject to International Competitive Bidding (ICB) and corruption. Recommendations were made to
address these issues. The Bank, through the Costal Biodiversity and Management Project , provided
support to strengthen the Recipient's capacity in procurement, modernize the procurement process and
improve regulation (approval of Gambia Public Procurement Act). Thanks to this plan, some of the issues
have been addressed, including: training staff responsible for procurement, designing standard bidding
documents, including provisions in the Code against corruption. Nonetheless, the situation remained
risky. A Country Procurement Issues Paper was prepared in 2005 as an update to the 1998 CPAR, and
giving an updated action plan. The GoTG has recently (March 2010) issued its own procurement report
along with a proposed action plan with several recommendations, including the need to strengthen
capacity in procurement management and the need for institutional reinforcement through the
establishment of a procurement regulatory body with an appeal committee, the strengthening of the
private sector and judiciary reinforcement.
24. For National Competitive method (NCB) can be used , subject to the following additional
requirements and modifications: (i) the Recipient shall use standard bidding documents for the
procurement of goods, works and non-consulting services acceptable to the Association; (ii) in accordance
with paragraph 1.16(e) of the Procurement Guidelines, each bidding document and contract financed from
the proceeds of the Grant shall provide that the bidders, suppliers, and contractors, and their sub-
contractors, agents, personnel, consultants, service providers or suppliers, shall permit the Association to
inspect all their accounts, records and other documents relating to the submission of bids and contract
performance, and to have them audited by auditors appointed by the Association. Acts intended to
materially impede the exercise of the Association's inspection and audit rights provided for in paragraph
1.16(e) of the Procurement Guidelines constitute an obstructive practice as defined in paragraph
1.16(a)(v)(bb) of the Procurement Guidelines; and (iii) each bidding document and contract financed from
the proceeds of the Grant shall include provisions on matters pertaining to fraud and corruption as defined
in paragraph 1.16(a) of the Procurement Guidelines. The Association will sanction a firm or individual, at
any time, in accordance with prevailing Association's sanctions procedures, including by publicly
declaring such firm or individual ineligible, either indefinitely or for a stated period of time: (A) to be
awarded an Association-financed contract; and (B) to be a nominated sub-contractor, consultant, supplier
or service provider of an otherwise eligible firm being awarded an Association-financed contract.
25. Procurement of Works: Works procured under this project would include small civil works for the cable
inland connection. No high value contract on civil works is expected to be financed under this project.
26. Procurement of Goods: Goods procured under this project would include and are not limited to:
Telecommunication equipment and accessories, vehicles, Internet connectivity, office furniture, office
equipment (Office Space for WARCIP – PIU)
Most of the contracts are of small value and therefore ICB method is very limited. The procurement will
be done using Bank‟s SBD for all ICB and for all NCB subject to any adaptation as required. Small
contracts for goods may be procured using the shopping procedures as per paragraph 3.5 of the
Procurement Guidelines.
37
27. Procurement of non-consulting services: These services may concern operating expenses such as office
maintenance, rent of Office Space for WARCIP - PIU, equipment maintenance, and non-consulting
services related to the organization of workshops. The related contracts will be at small value and they
may be procured using the shopping procedures as per paragraph 3.5 of the Procurement Guidelines.
28. Selection of Consultants: Consulting services will include but are not limited to (i) Internet Exchange
Point Study, ii) selection of an Advisor to optimize the governance, ownership and financing issues
related to the operation of the landing station and provision of networks and services emanating from the
ACE Cable, iii) Selection of an Investment Bank to support implementation of ownership and
management of landing station including implementation of divestiture strategy for Government
shareholding, iv) Legal and regulatory due diligence, safeguards for open access including gateway
liberalization, v) Broadband study strategy and demand stimulation strategy and action plan, vi)
Environmental Studies, vii) Restructuring of GAMTEL for the repositioning, viii) recruitment of PIU‟s
key staff, (ix) Project‟s operation manual, x) financial audits.
Short lists of consultants for services estimated to cost less than US $ 200,000 equivalent per contract may
be composed entirely of national consultants in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of the
Consultant Guidelines.
29. Operational Costs: these costs may include office furniture, office maintenance, equipment maintenance
and cost related to the project coordination needs; they are either goods or non-consulting services and
they may be procured using the shopping procedures as per paragraph 3.5 of the Procurement Guidelines.
The project operational manual should describe the procurement process for the related goods or non-
consulting services.
B. Assessment of the agency‟s capacity to implement procurement
30. IDA funding for component 1 (a) on international connectivity does not go towards a procurable
item subject to compliance with World Bank procurement guidelines. This is because such funding is
for membership fees (paid in different installments) against a set of rights including use of a certain
amount of capacity at preferred rates and a share of ownership of an indivisible cable infrastructure asset.
For other project components (1 b, components 2 and 3), IDA procurement guidelines will apply
and Procurement activities will be carried out by the PIU to be created in the MoICI. This PIU will
be staffed by a Project Coordinator, a Procurement Specialist, a Financial Management Specialist and an
accountant. A Monitoring and Evaluation consultant will also be hired under the project. Meanwhile, the
fiduciary function for WARCIP Project Preparation Advance is entrusted to the IFMIS project team. This
team comprises a qualified procurement specialist who has both the technical expertise and the experience
necessary to carry out the procurement activities envisaged under the project and has been recruited on a
competitive basis for a part time position.
31. An assessment of the capacity of the MoICI to implement procurement actions for the project has
been carried out. The assessment reviewed the organizational structure for implementing the project.
38
32. Most of the issues/ risks concerning the procurement have been identified and include:
The PIU is not yet created, nor a procurement specialist appointed. MoICI has not implemented
a former project under The World bank financing, and has not past experience on the World
Bank procedures. The Ministry‟s Contract Committee members are not familiar with
international procurement procedures, and may obstruct or delay the procurement process,
especially the evaluation of bids and consultants‟ proposals;
The prior review of the procurement documents and procurement decisions by the procurement
control body in the country may not be enforced for all contracts, in particular those under
foreign financing;
As the project includes activities related to GAMTEL, PURA and other beneficiaries, including
the Ministry of Finance, possible interactions between the PIU and the other actors (MoICI,
GAMTEL and PURA) may affect negatively the procurement process.
The MoICI doesn‟t have a Manual of Procedures nor a PIM but has an acceptable filing system
33. The corrective measures which have been agreed are:
As mentioned in the implementing arrangements, a PIU will be created. The procurement
function of the PIU will be performed by the Procurement Consultant of the IFMIS Project and
extended her support to the Project Preparation Advance. Since she has been recruited on a
competitive basis, and she has the necessary qualification and experience, at effectiveness, she
might be considered to fill the procurement position of the PIU. The PIU procurement
specialist will be assisted by the procurement officer under recruitment by MoICI so as to
definitely build the procurement capacity within MoICI and will provide procurement capacity
building to the technical staff of the project including all actors of the MoICI involved in the
project‟s implementation. This approach would ensure that the technical specialists and experts
will have basic procurement capacity so as to properly handle technical responsibilities in
preparing procurement documents including terms of references and technical specifications.
The procurement documents and procurement decisions might be submitted to the prior review
by the procurement control body, The Gambia Public Procurement Authority)
The control that will be exercised by the country procurement control body might help mitigate
any possible interference that may occur between the PIU and other actors.
PIU will develop a Manual of procedures and will put in place a good filing system
34. The overall project risk for procurement is substantial.
C. Procurement Plan
33. The Recipient has developed a Procurement Plan for project implementation which provides the
basis for the procurement methods. This plan was reviewed by the Bank and approved during appraisal
On May 13, 2011. Once it is approved, the procurement plan will be made available in the Project‟s
39
database at the office of the PIU and at the MoICI in Banjul and at the Bank‟s external website. The
Procurement Plan will be updated in agreement with the Project Team annually or as required to reflect
the actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.
D. Frequency of Procurement Supervision
34. In addition to the prior review supervision to be carried out from Bank offices, the capacity assessment
of the Implementing Agency has recommended one supervision mission at least every six (6) months to
visit the field to carry out post review of procurement actions.
40
Appendix:
The procurement methods and prior review thresholds are indicated in the Tables below.
For Goods, works and non-consulting services
Procurement
Method
Prior Review Threshold Comments
1. ICB (Goods) = or >US$300,000 ICB for goods will be used for US$ 300,000 and above
2. NCB (Goods) The first contract,
irrespective of its cost
estimate
NCB for goods will be used for less than US$ 300,000
3. ICB (Works) = or >US$3,000,000 ICB for works will be used for US$3,000,000 and above
4. NCB (Works) The first contract,
irrespective of its cost
estimate
NCB for works will be used for less than US$3,000,000
5. ICB (Non-
Consultant
Services), if any
= or >US$ 300,000 ICB for non-consultant services will be used for US$300,000 and above
6. NCB (Non-
Consultant
Services)
The first contract,
irrespective of its cost
estimate
NCB for non-consultants services will be used for less than US$ 300,000
7. Shopping <US$50,000 and the first
contract under US$50,000
Shopping for works, goods and non-consultant services will be used for
less than or equivalent to US$50,000. If more than US$50,000, prior
clearance is needed from IDA with relevant justifications. The cost
estimate will not exceed US$100,000.
8. Direct contracting All, irrespective of the cost
estimate
None
9 Limited
International
Bidding
The first contract,
irrespective of its cost
estimate or = >US$3,000,000
LIB for non consultant services will be used for US$300,000 and above
For Consultant Services
Selection Method Prior Review
Threshold Comments
1. Competitive Methods (Firms) = or
>US$200,000
The first contract,
irrespective of its cost
estimate will be prior
reviewed
2. Single Source (Firms)
All, irrespective
of the cost
estimate
3. Individual Consultants = or
>US$100,000
The first contract,
irrespective of cost
estimate will be prior
reviewed
4. Single source for Individual Consultants
All, irrespective
of the cost
estimate
All, irrespective of the cost
estimate
5.
Contracts for specific assignments such as contracts for the elaboration of
manual of the project implementation and the manual of procedures, contracts
for monitoring and evaluation assignments; contracts for financial assistance
assignments; contracts for financial audit; contracts for technical audit;
contracts for environmental and social issues; contracts for legal assignments
All, irrespective
of the cost
estimate
Those contracts are not
selection methods; but due
to their sensitivity, they
will be subject to prior
review
41
Details of the Procurement Arrangement
List of contract Packages for Goods and non-consulting services.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ref.
No.
Contract
(Description)
Estimated
Cost
US$
Procurem
ent
Method
Prequalificat
ion (yes/no)
Domestic
Preferenc
e
(yes/no)
Review
by
Bank
(Prior /
Post)
Expected
Bid-Opening
Date
Comments
COMPONENT 1: CONNECTIVITY
1 Provision of Local
Area Networks for
Government
Connectivity(Teleco
mmunication
Equipment and
accessories
US$
200,000
NCB No No Prior August 10 2011
2 IXP equipment US$150,000 LIB No No Post March 30, 2012
3 Servers for domain
name re-delegation
US$150,000 NCB No No Post February 15, 2012
COMPONENT 3. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND M & E
1 Vehicle US$ 45,000 Shopping No No Post August 18 2011
2 Internet
Connectivity
US$
30,000
Shopping No No Post July 14 2011 PPA
3 Office Furniture US$
20,000
Shopping No No Post August 29 2011 PPA
4 Office
Equipment(Laptops,
PABX System,
Overhead Projector
US$
30,000
Shopping No No Post October 4 2011 PPA
5 Logistics (Laptop(5
Nos.),
PC(1No.),USB
Flash Drives, etc
US$
25,000
Shopping No No Prior April 18 2011 PPA
6 Rent(Office Space
for WARCIP –
PIU)
US$
150,000
Shopping No No Prior May 18 2011 PPA
7 Operational Support
for SPV
US$ 150,000 Shopping No No Post October20, 2011
8 Generator for PIU US$ 15,000 Shopping No No Post July 20, 2011
9 Other Operational
Cost
US$
105,000
Shopping No No Post Dec. 21 2011 Only the
items that
will need
procurement
procedures
are
concerned.
For example:
fuel and
vehicle
maintenance,
insurance,
building
security and
maintenance,
translation
services,
photocopies
and office
supplies.
42
Works
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ref.
No.
Contract
(Description)
Estimated
Cost
US$
Procurement
Method
Prequalificat
ion (yes/no)
Domesti
c
Preferen
ce
(yes/no)
Review
by Bank
(Prior / Post)
Expected
Bid-Opening
Date
Comm
ents
COMPONENT 3: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND M & E
1 Rehabilitation of
PIU office
US$ 16,000 Shopping No No Post Review July 11 2011
Consultancy Assignments with Selection Methods and Time Schedule
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ref Description of Assignment Estimated
Cost
US$
Selectio
n
Method
Review
by Bank
(Prior /
Post)
Expected
Proposals
Submission
Date
Comments
SUPPORTING CONNECTIVITY
1 Internet Exchange Point Study,
supply of IT and
Telecommunication Equipment
Implementation
US$50,000 CQS Post October 18,
2011
2 Feasibility study for improved
connectivity to neighboring
countries
US$ 400,000 QCBS Prior December 14,
2011
3 Design and implementation of
government connectivity
US$ 275,000 QCBS Prior February 14,
2012
2. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT FOR IMPROVED CONNECTIVITY(US$7.250MILLION)
1 International Advisor to optimize the
governance, ownership and financing
issues related to the operation of the
landing station and provision of
networks and services emanating
from the ACE Cable
US$200,000 IC Prior
Review
April 15,
2011
Done
2 Investment Bank to support
implementation of ownership and
management of landing station
including implementation of
divestiture strategy for Government
shareholding
US$500,000 QCBS Prior
Review
July 15, 2011
3 Legal and regulatory due diligence,
safeguards for open access including
gateway liberalization
US$500,000 QCBS Prior
Review
June 15, 2011
4 Implementation support for open
access to backbone
US$ 250,000 QCBS Prior
Review
September 29,
2011
5 Broadband study strategy and demand
stimulation strategy and action plan
US$500,000 QCBS Prior
Review
July 25, 2011 PPA
6
Implementation support for
broadband strategy implementation
US$ 500,000 QCBS Prior September 21,
2012
7 Communications Infrastructure
strategy
US$ 500,000 QCBS Prior September 15,
2011
8 Legal and regulatory support to
increase ICT use
US 500,000 QCBS Prior October 30,
2011
43
Ref
Description of Assignment
Estimated
Cost
US$
Selectio
n
Method
Review
by Bank
(Prior /
Post)
Expected
Proposals
Submission
Date
Comments
9 Consultancy for Domain name re-
delegation
US$ 200,000 QCBS Prior October 12,
2011
10 Regulatory and organizational action
plan for PURA
US$ 150,00 QCBS Post September 20,
2011
11 Development of key regulatory
instruments
US$ 900,000 QCBS Prior October 15,
2011
12 Fee and taxation study US$ 150,000 QCBS Post December
12, 2011
13 Structural separation (operational +
regulatory support)
US 700,000 QCBS Prior March 15,
2012
14 Strategic support for GAMTEL
repositioning
US$600,000 QCBS Prior January 16,
2012
15 Specific Management Consultancy
Services for GAMTEL
US$ 200,000 QCBS Prior November 15,
2011
COMPONENT 3. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND M & E
1 PIU Coordinator US$150,000 IC Prior June 27 2011
2 PIU Procurement Specialist US$125,000 IC Prior June 27 2011
3 PIU Financial Management Specialist US$125,000 IC Prior June 20 2011
4 PIU Accountant US$75,000 IC Prior June 20 2011
5
Support Staff US$75,000 IC Post Sept 10 2011
6
Project Operational Manual including
accounting manual
US$50,000
CQS
Prior
June 10, 2011
7 Design and installation and training
of accounting software
US$ 25,000 IC Post August 16,
2011
8 ESMF and RPF US$54,000 CQS Prior April 11 2011 Done
8 M & E US$50,000 IC Prior Dec 22 2011
9 Communications U$100,000 IC Prior Dec 22 2011
10 Surveys US$ 46,000 IC Post April 4 2011
12 External Audit US 40,000 QCBS Prior Nov. 17 2011
11. Legal advisor for SPV US$ 100,000 IC Prior October 17
2010
Implementing Agency Capacity Building Activities with Time Schedule
No.
Expected outcome /
Activity Description
Estimated Cost
Estimated
Duration
Start Date
Comments
1 Training for regulators(PURA) 300,000 To be
determined
Sept 2011 A training plan will be
developed for each year and sent
to the Bank for review
2 Capacity building for PIU Staff 70,000 To be
determined
October 2011 A training plan will be
developed for each year and sent
to the Bank for review
3 Capacity Building(Management
Technical and Skills Re-engineering)
US$300,000 To be
determined
October 2011 A training plan will be
developed for each year and sent
to the Bank for review
4 Capacity building for Ministry US$ 300,000 To Be
determined
October 2011 A training plan will be
developed for each year and sent
to the Bank for review
44
Anti-Corruption Action Plan: Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in
Projects Financed by IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants”, dated October 15, 2006 and revised in
January 2011. The Bank team intends to maintain customary oversight and will carry out prior review
of all major contracts according to the established thresholds within the country may be reviewed and
adjusted as needed in the Procurement Plan. The following measures will be carried out to mitigate
corruption risk:
Training of fiduciary staff: Starting from the project launch periodical trainings on procurement will be
conducted at the country level for all PIUs‟ fiduciary staff
Prior review: Intensive and close supervision by Bank procurement accredited staff. In addition, all
contract amendments will be subject to prior approval by the Bank;
Publication of Advertisements and Contracts: All publications of advertisements and contract awards,
will be done in accordance with the Guidelines requirements and published through client connection
system, on external websites, i.e. UNDB and dgMarket websites;
Debarred Firms: Appropriate attention will be given to the need to ensure that debarred firms or
individuals are not given opportunities to compete for Bank-financed contracts;
Complaints: All complaints by bidders will be diligently addressed and monitored in consultation with
the Bank;
Evaluation Committee: The Bank will review and comment on qualifications and experience of
proposed members of the Evaluation committee(s) with a view to avoid that unqualified or biased
candidates are nominated. All members will require to sign a disclosure form (sample will be included
in Operational Manual)
Monitoring of contract awards: All contracts are required to be signed within the validity of the
bids/proposals and, in case of prior review contracts, promptly after the no objection is issued.
Procurement Plan format shall include information on actual dates (of no objections and award) and will
be monitored for cases of delay which will be looked at on a case-by-case basis to identify the reasons.
The PIU will maintain up to date procurement records and to be available to all concerned Bank staff,
auditors and INT members of the Bank.
Monitoring of Payments: All contracts shall include bank account information. The bank account shall
be in the name of the same supplier/consultant that submitted the bid and awarded the contract.
Payments to local suppliers -consultants shall be made in local currency only and paid to the accounts of
banks located within the country.
Timeliness of Payments: Payment to suppliers and consultants will be monitored through semi-annual
interim un-audited financial reports (IFRs) to ensure timely payments. The PIU will maintain a
system/database to ensure payments to the suppliers and contractors are made without delay according
to the conditions of the contract.
45
E. Environmental and Social safeguards
35. The proposed project is rated as a Category B project. The safeguards policy triggered are Environmental
Assessment (OP/BP 4.01), Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04), Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) and
Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11). The physical cable system will comprise two fiber pairs that
provide two separate bi-directional paths (i.e., one fiber in each pair carries signals in the outbound
direction and the other fiber in the return or inbound direction). The cable system is likely to have a
submerged or „wet plant‟ part, and a „dry plant‟ part which interfaces at proposed Landing Stations.
Safeguards for Deep Sea18
Activities
36. Deep ocean fiber optic cables are no larger than 17-21 mm diameter – about the size of a domestic garden
hose and are laid mainly upon the surface of the ocean floor (“surface laid”). Sections of the cable
(including both wet and dry plants) lie within the territorial waters of the landing parties while remaining
sections lie in the exclusive economic zones of such states. The Gambia is a party to the 1982 United
Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and has declared exclusive economic zones of 200
miles. In the exclusive economic zones, states have no sovereign rights but can enforce laws on pollution,
taxation, customs and immigration (see figure 3.2, below). Within their territorial waters, on the other
hand, countries have sovereign rights. Foreign nations have the freedom of laying submarine pipes and
cables in the exclusive economic zones.
Figure 3.2: Designated ocean zones according to UNCLOS.
18 "Deep Sea", as used here, describes areas beyond which cable burial is not required (mainly because threats to the cable from trawling activities are non-existing).
This starts usually after 1000/ 1500 meters depth.
46
37. In general, however, the section of the cable that lies in the deep sea has minimal impact on marine
mammals and fish. The threat of whale entanglements has diminished significantly with improvements
since 1956 in the design of cable and in the precision with which they can be laid in close conformity with
the seabed profile, and without loops and twists.
38. Generally speaking, there are no significant environmental issues concerning fiber cables in the deep sea
(significant issues are concentrated on shallow waters and the coastal areas/beach). The operation phase of
the submarine cable will not have any significant adverse impact on the bio-physical and social
environment except during cable repairs and recovery. There will be very limited maintenance of the
cable. The cable will have a passive influence on the environment. Impacts during cable repair and
recovery activities will be similar to impacts during the construction phase activities.
39. The extensive studies that take place prior to final cable laying tend to work as effective safeguards
against any possible environmental disruption, since in large part they are intended to identify routes for
the cable that will avoid seamounts, volcanoes, canyons, vents, seeps, deepwater reefs, dissected terrain –
all areas that tend to be associated with higher biological value than the general abyssal plain.
40. Given that much of the deep ocean lie beyond national jurisdictions, few EIAs for any marine activities
have been undertaken in this zone and thus there is little evidence of any environmental issues, except in
cases of oil and gas exploration and very deep sea trawling. No specific environmental studies are
undertaken for submarine cables; rather the detailed Cable Route Survey effectively serves this purpose.
At the surface, pollution of the high seas by oil and wastes discharged from vessels can be effectively
controlled if those vessels observe compliance with maritime conventions.
41. Based on these experiences, it may not be necessary The Gambia to conduct EIAs of the deep sea, though
this should not deter The Gambia from considering in the screening and scoping phases of their EIAs
whether there are areas of deep sea traversed by ACE and within the geographical limits of application of
its domestic EIA legislation to which attention should be paid.
Safeguards for Shallow Water Activities
.
42. The site selected for cable landing or Terminal Station is at Brusubi Phase III Institutional Area and
currently lies fallow. It is approximately 3km from the Beach Man Hole at the beach. The land currently
has no permanent structures and borders the Brufut-Sukuta Coastal road. The site is about 2,800m2 (40m
x 70m) and has the following coordinates N13o24.785‟ and W16o43.126‟. The major
facilities/infrastructure to be installed at the beach and the Brusubi sites include the Landing Station
building, Zero manhole, BMH, connections conduits and ducts, generators, fuel tanks, transformer, switch
board and cable drums. The cable station is expected to take about 45m x 25m land space with
approximately half of this space for equipment and the balance for maintenance, training, and office
spaces. GAMTEL/PIU is committed to ensuring that environmentally conscious practices are carried out
during construction and operation of the submarine and landing station project, including: (a)
incorporating environmental considerations into its planning, management and operational activities; (b)
Having an Environmental and Safety Coordinator/consultant to be directly responsible for environmental
and safety issues during construction and operation; and (c) allocating and maintaining resources for the
effective implementation of the ESIA/ ESMP.
47
43. This project will affect less than 50 persons and therefore the equivalent of an ARAP, an RRP, has
been prepared, consulted upon and disclosed before appraisal. It is a plan that will guide the
management of the few resettlement issues which have been identified, even though these may seem to be
of minor significance. The project will affect 27 persons and will not cause any permanent or temporary
structure to be demolished. It will only create temporary inconveniences during the construction phase
and limited economic disadvantages to business concerns. There are no land acquisition issues as the site
for the Landing Station is state property which has been allocated to the project for the purpose. Key
stakeholders for consultation included current inhabitants (where applicable) of landing sites, the
Environmental Protection Agencies. Limited funding is needed for compensation for inconveniences
resulting from the project
Monitoring & Evaluation
44. The PIU will monitor and evaluate national projects. They will bear the primary responsibility for project
monitoring and evaluation (M&E), and, as such, will establish standard formats and guidelines for data
collection and reporting, and will organize training sessions for project stakeholders in their use.
45. An M&E system will be set up within the PIU to keep track of and evaluate implementation progress of
the proposed IDA project within the broader context of the institutional framework for the
telecommunications sector. Although increased geographical reach and reduction of costs at the country
level remains the hallmark of success of an enabling environment, the project‟s M&E system will seek
first to measure results that are closely associated with project activities. Hence, the first order of
indicators that the M&E system will look at shall include lower indicators related to quality, quantity, and
time (see Annex 1). Ultimately, improvement of laws and decrees by the project activities (component 2)
will have positive ripple effects on the whole sector and on service delivery.
46. The views of direct beneficiaries will be brought into the monitoring and evaluation process. Comprehensive M&E reporting will be needed to monitor the results and performance of the project. It
will involve mainly the direct beneficiaries of project activities, but will be extended to other beneficiaries
such as telecommunications operators and private ICT firms, which ultimately are the main beneficiaries
of the project‟s outcomes. The PIUs will review and validate the reports on performance indicators and
recommend corrective action if necessary.
Role of Partners
47. The World Bank is collaborating with the IsDB to develop a seamless communications network for The
Gambia. The IsDB is in the process of assisting a number of countries in West Africa to build their
national backbone and to improve their connectivity to their neighbors. Support to The Gambia is already
approved.
48. The World Bank will also coordinate with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The
program will also coordinate with ITU in the area of capacity building for regional regulatory authorities,
given existing programs by ITU in this area.
48
Annex 4: Operational Risk Assessment Framework (ORAF)
THE GAMBIA
WARCIP 1B
Project Development Objective(s)
To increase the geographical reach of broadband networks and reduce costs of communications services in The Gambia
PDO Level Results
Indicators:
Volume of international traffic (Mbit/s per person)
Access to internet services (%)
Average monthly price of wholesale international E1 capacity link from capital city to Europe
Number of direct project beneficiaries, of which female
Risk Category
Risk Rating Risk Description Proposed Mitigation Measures
Project Stakeholder Risks
MI Lack of collaboration of stakeholders
Divestment process less successful than anticipated
Difficulties changing ACE CMA signatory and handing
over rights and responsibilities of GAMTEL to the new
SPV
PPA approved and includes support for PPP structures that
will make it attractive for private investment. Private sector
already signaled significant interest under transparent
conditions.
Detailed due diligence to identify incentives for existing
operators to willingly participate in the proposed
infrastructure is contemplated under APL 1-B of the project.
Initial TA provided for The Gambia already outlined a
process for the discussion with ACE.
49
Risk Category
Risk Rating
Risk Description
Proposed Mitigation Measures
Implementing Agency Risks
MI
The Gambia implementing agencies have limited
experience with the envisaged complex project
arrangements. A very steep learning curve is anticipated.
The Financial Management staff is not yet in place and
there is not a FM manual and an accounting software
Extensive preparation work and due diligence has been
carried out by the Task Team and the client to ensure
ownership and identification of potential implementation
issues. The PPA put in place will finance TA activities
aiming at enhancing the implementing agencies‟ capacity to
mitigate risks of slow start and missing the ACE‟s tight
disbursement deadlines.
A stand alone PIU will be established. FM action plan was
agreed and will be implemented during the project including
development of FM manual, acquisition of FM software and
hiring of an FM specialist and an accountant.
Project Risks
Design
MI Non conformance with linkage conditionality (cross-
effectiveness conditions and cross-suspension remedies)
for regional cooperation
Risk of delays could result in penalty to clients for
missing ACE payment milestone
Project commercially not viable due to insufficient
demand for services.
Design of the project is complex and risky (Public Private
Partnership)
Program structured so that if the Financing Agreement for
any of the other two countries never enters into effect or if
disbursements there-under are suspended, this would only
reduce the scope but not affect the overall implementation of
the independent Gambia activities.
The CMA provides for installment payments; The Gambia
Government has already provided the first 3 and
concessional financing will be arranged to cover the balance.
Early results of traffic assessment confirm viability. Detailed
traffic study will be conducted and Demand stimulating
approaches will be explored to address potential risk
Support to PPP arrangement from PPA. For all other project
components, the project is not relatively complex. The
components are dedicated to well-specified structures which
will designate a focal point.
50
Risk Category
Risk Rating
Risk Description
Proposed Mitigation Measures
Social and Environmental
ML
Possible environmental and social impacts including
possible impacts on critical habitats and/or physical
cultural resources.
The institutional responsibilities for preparing the various
safeguards instruments would lie with the PIU and the
SPV Given the need to ensure compliance with
safeguards instrument preparation there will be the need
for capacity building.
The ESMP/EIA was developed and disclosed before
appraisal. In addition the equivalent of an ARAP, an RRP,
was developed to deal with inconvenience related to the
project to the 27 affected persons. Finally, since the Program
will involve PPP schemes, appropriate technical clauses will
be prepared and included in the binding documents for the
Private Entity when necessary, to ensure the execution of
agreed environmental and social safeguards measures and
implementation of the recommendations in the instruments.
Program and Donor
ML Potential difficulties securing funding for the national
backbone
Funding already secured from IsDB with coordination to
ensure open access for the backbone infrastructure and
capacity.
Delivery Quality
ML The Project expected results depend on many factors
sometimes outside the project‟s scope. This may also
affect the sustainability of the Program‟s achievements.
The Project includes M&E activities that have been
discussed in details with the clients during preparation. The
M&E system will ensure an efficient monitoring of results
achievement and should prevent major implementation
issues. The commitment of the Project‟s stakeholders to the
new PPP arrangements as well as the institutional and policy
framework improvement will ensure sustainability of project
results beyond its completion.
Overall Risk Rating at
Preparation
Overall Risk Rating During
Implementation Comments
MI MI
Major issues and risks will be dealt with by effectiveness
through targeted activities financed by the PPA. The MI
rating for implementation is mainly due to the risky
country and institutional contexts, outside the project
scope.
51
Annex 5: Implementation Support Plan
THE GAMBIA
WARCIP 1B
1. Policy, regulatory, environmental and social safeguards are being put in place prior
to full implementation PPA granted to The Gambia is expected to ensure that the
policy, regulatory, environmental and social safeguards, as well as requisite capacity are
in place before Board. The PPA is also expected to ensure that the Government has the
requisite Transaction, Legal and Regulatory experts to ensure open access, effective
structuring of PPPs to own and manage communications infrastructure. Additional
resources have been provided to support the Government to undertake environmental
assessments and to put in place mitigation measures. These activities are in various
stages of implementation and expected to be completed before project effectiveness.
2. The team has conducted preliminary assessments of the institutions expected to
execute the project. The strategic partnerships and collaboration, combined with active
client engagement and upfront preparatory work, are expected to facilitate achievement of
the PDO. Furthermore the team has conducted preliminary assessments of the institutions
expected to execute the Program to ensure that they meet the minimum requirements of
the World Bank‟s fiduciary obligations.
3. Payment to ACE will be through direct Disbursement. Beyond this, and to further
mitigate risks, the team is structuring the WARCIP Gambia to ensure that direct payments
are made to the Cable consortium which is managing the submarine cable construction on
behalf of consortium members. This will mean that at least 70% of funds will be paid
directly to the Cable Consortium, and the countries manage less than 20% of the targeted
funds which will be used primarily for institutional and implementation support and to
improve the enabling environment.
What would be the main focus in terms of support to implementation?
Table 5.1: Main focus of support to implement Time Focus Skills Needed Resource
Estimate
Partner Role
First twelve
months
Creation/Strengthening
of PIUs
Transaction/Legal
Advisory Work
Procurement, FM,
Program
Coordinators
Experienced
Transaction and
Legal Teams
US$ 100,000 NA
12-48 months Divestiture of Gov.
Shares in SPV
Transaction/Legal
Teams
US$ 100,000 NA
Other Strengthening of
regulatory and policy
capacity
Regulatory and ICT
specialists
US$ 100,000 NA
52
Implementation Support Plan
4. The Bank team members will be based either in Washington DC or in the Africa
region, and will be available to provide timely, efficient and effective implementation
support to the client. Formal supervision and field visits will be carried out semi-
annually initially, with possibility for annual visits in later years of the project. Detailed
inputs from the Bank team are outlined below:
Technical inputs. Technical telecommunications and regulatory related inputs are
required to review bid documents to ensure fair competition through proper technical
specifications and fair assessment of the technical aspects of bids. ICT Policy
Specialists and regulatory specialists will provide technical support and conduct
supervision visits whenever needed.
Fiduciary requirements and inputs. Training will be provided by the Bank‟s financial
management specialist and procurement specialist before the commencement of
project implementation as needed. The team will also help identify capacity building
needs to strengthen its financial management capacity and to improve procurement
management efficiency. Both the financial management and the procurement
specialist will be based in the region to provide timely support. Formal supervision of
financial management will be carried out semi-annually or annually, while
procurement supervision will be carried out on a timely basis as required by the client.
Safeguards. Inputs from an environment specialist and a social specialist may be
required, though the project‟s social and environmental impacts are limited and client
capacity is generally adequate. No field visits are likely to be required, but this will
be confirmed - the social and environmental specialists will be available on a need
basis.
Operation. The Task Team will also provide day to day supervision of all operational
aspects, as well as coordination with the client and among Bank team members. If
needed, a consultant may be used to support this role.
The main focus of implementation support is summarized below.
Table 5.2: Implementation support
Time Focus Resource Estimate in Staff Weeks Partner
Role Project
duration
Team leadership, technical and procurement
review of the bidding documents and
Institutional arrangement and project
supervision coordination
ICT Policy Specialist 15 SWs
NA
Procurement training Procurement specialist(s) 2 SWs
NA
FM training and supervision FM specialist 2 SWs
NA
Environmental and Social Issues
Social specialist 0.5 SWs
Environmental specialist(s) 0.5 SWs
NA
53
Staff skill mix required is summarized below.
`Table 5.3: Staff skill mix Skills Needed Number of Staff Weeks Number of Trips Comments
Task team leaders 15 SWs annually Fields trips as required. DC or Country office
based
Procurement 2 SWs annually Fields trips as required. Country office based
Social specialist 0.5 SWs annually Fields trips as required. Country office based
Environment specialist 0.5 SWs annually Fields trips as required. Country office based
Financial management
specialist
2 SWs annually Fields trips as required. Country office based
Legal support 1 SW Fields trips as required DC based
54
Annex 6: Team Composition
THE GAMBIA
WARCIP 1B
Name Title Unit
Boutheina Guermazi Sr. Regulatory Specialist ICT Sector Unit
Mavis Ampah Sr. ICT Policy Specialist ICT Sector Unit
Doyle Gallegos Lead ICT Policy Specialist ICT Sector Unit
Laurent Besancon Regional Coordinator ICT Sector Unit
Marc Lixi Sr. Operations Officer ICT Sector Unit
Sarah Brierley STC ICT Sector Unit
Michele Ralisoa Noro Sr. Program Assistant ICT Sector Unit
Gurcharan Singh Sr. Procurement Specialist ICT Sector Unit
Duncan Wambogo
Omole
Information Analyst ICT Sector Unit
Deo Ndikumana Sr. Operations Officer (AFCRI) AFCRI
Carlos Cavalcanti Country economist AFTP4
David Satola Sr. Counsel LEGPS
Harvey van Veldhuizen Lead Environmental Specialist MIGEP
Beatrix Allah-Mensah Social Development Specialist AFTCS
Bienvenu Rajaonson Sr. Environmental Specialist AFTEN
Sidy Diop Procurement Specialist AFTPC
Wolfgang Chadab Sr. Finance Officer CTRFC
Claudia Pardiñas Ocaña Sr. Counsel LEGAF
Alexandra Sperling Paralegal LEGAF
Maimouna Fam Sr. Financial Management
Specialist
AFTFM
Ngor Sene Financial Management
Specialist
AFTFM
55
Annex 7: Economic and Financial Analysis
THE GAMBIA
WARCIP 1B
1. Connecting locally to a submarine fiber-cable system minimizes transit costs and
is the most cost-effective long term option for The Gambia. The analysis to assess
the merit of The Gambia‟s connectivity options examined a variety of satellite and
optic fiber options. The analysis finds that in the case of The Gambia a submarine
fiber link with domestic landing station is the best overall option in terms of long-term
cost effectiveness and bandwidth availability. More specifically, considering the
limited number of fiber alternatives and their higher cost, the Africa Coast to Europe
(ACE) cable project is currently the best fiber option for this country. The cost of
capacity on ACE will be an order of ten times cheaper than the current cost of capacity
on existing African submarine cables linking to Europe (e.g. MainOne or SAT-
3/WASC), which is between US $280 and US$ 800/Mbit/s/month, and averages
$500/Mbit/s/month. The cost advantages of ACE are even greater when compared to
satellite capacity costs, which are at least US$ 4000/Mbit/s/month. Aside from low
bandwidth costs, the high quality of fiber bandwidth provided is also a factor which
has to be taken into account in comparing options.
2. Benefits of fiber-cable investment: low transit costs; lower prices; and increased
reliability in accessing international bandwidth. In the case of The Gambia,
although up-front costs are higher, the key cost saving with the ACE compared to
existing alternative fiber options is the high cost involved in the purchasing of capacity
from an existing landing station in Africa to the global backbones. The Gambia‟s
participation in ACE, which lands traffic directly in Europe, will ensure that transit
costs to the global backbones are minimized. ACE also has an advantage over a cross-
border fiber option in terms of speed and costs, and is without the need for
independent management, planning and maintenance. For international connectivity
the country currently depends on a single unstable high-cost 155Mbit/s terrestrial link
to neighbouring Senegal, which has contributed to high prices at the retail level and
reduced the level of reliability. A dedicated domestic landing station will both reduce
the cost of international bandwidth as well as increase reliability. To approximate the
relative savings produced by fiber compared to satellite consider that in 2010 The
Gambia used approximately 155 Mbit/s of international bandwidth. Purchased through
satellite this costs approximately US $3.7 million, compared to ACE which would be
US$558 000 (conservatively assuming US$ 300/Mbit/s/month). This cost savings
would also benefit the local economy as it also means much less funds would move
off-shore in payments to international satellite operators. If ACE pricing drops to
levels seen elsewhere on the continent for wholesale submarine fiber capacity, (US$
50-US$ 100/Mbit/s/month), the savings for operators would be correspondingly
greater.
3. Fiber cable systems that serve the West Africa region and the upcoming ACE
cable use well-proven technologies and involve no appreciable technology risk. The new ACE cable design is both “state of the art”, uses well-established procedures,
and involves no significant technology risk.
56
4. Fiber cable has an advantage over satellite in terms of price and quality of service. Use
of satellite bandwidth to meet international connectivity needs was eliminated as too
costly and suffering from lower quality than fiber. The latency factor introduced in
satellite links can be a problem with some communication services, especially high
data rate interactive multimedia applications. The almost 1-second delays introduced
by satellite connectivity significantly reduces performance of some services and limits
the types of services that can be provided, such as the use of secure Virtual Private
Networks (VPNs), which time out when performance is degraded by satellite links.
While it is possible to circumvent these problems to some extent through use of
sophisticated traffic shaping devices at each end of the link, this creates additional
capital and human resource costs for the user. And the perceived disadvantages of
satellite can limit foreign investment in the sector, especially among high bandwidth
consuming interactive services such as Business Process Outsourcing call centres and
VPN networks where companies are reticent to establish these on the end of a satellite
link because of the latency issue.
5. „Medium earth orbit‟ (MEO) satellites (MEO) and terrestrial microwave options are
relatively more costly compared to fiber option. There have been suggestions that a new
type of satellite service based on 'medium earth orbit' satellites (MEOs), which
provides lower levels of latency due to their greater proximity to earth, could meet
needs for improved international connectivity. However, the only proposed service of
this type, called 03B, has yet to launch any satellites and is still relatively costly when
compared to the fiber options, so it was also eliminated from further consideration as a
national solution, although in some remote areas it may have value for providing
connectivity where there is no fiber. In the same vein, improved terrestrial microwave
links could be considered another alternative, however as with satellite solutions, these
links do not scale economically to the levels of bandwidth that are expected to be
required at an international level. This is evidenced by the efforts of international
mobile operators to replace their existing international microwave links with fiber.
Table 7.1: Advantages and Disadvantages of submarine fiber cable compared to Satellite
Increased satellite capacity ACE Submarine Cable Systems
Advantages Lower CAPEX and O&M; Bandwidth purchases
grow in concert with demand growth;
Less risk of service being discontinued for long
periods
Future proof in terms of capacity available and superior quality through
higher performance (lower latency);
Much lower cost for bandwidth. Fixed cost for capacity investment
means prices go down as usage picks up .
Disadvantages Far higher cost for bandwidth;
High latency can limit the bandwidth quality and
applications that can be used.
Higher CAPEX required (effectively a pre-purchase of bandwidth, most
of which will be for future use); More expensive O&M; Slower repair
times means need for backup via alternative cross-border fiber route or
satellite in case of cable damage (if only one cable)
Socio/
Economic/
User Impact
Number of Internet users and extent of usage is
constrained by high bandwidth prices and slower
performance.
Reduced potential for development of local ICT
Number of Internet users and extent of usage grows rapidly, less
constrained by high bandwidth prices and slower performance. Increased
potential for development of local ICT industry and more BPO
opportunities. More extensive use by government as Internet penetration
reaches majority of people. improved educational opportunities through
57
industry and fewer BPO opportunities.
More limited potential value/use by government
due to reduced Internet penetration in the
population generally.
increase in access to information and education resources;
Development of a regional sense of community through greater equality
of Information sharing across geographical regions and across groups in
society
Economic benefits from the enhanced opportunities for new and small
enterprises that may have previously been excluded from technologies by
high costs; and macro-economic benefits of the potential expansion of
technology-reliant industries, such as information technology services
and software development businesses.
6. Assumptions of financial analysis. Financial comparisons of satellite versus fiber
options were made using the following assumptions:
ACE investment participation costs assumes US$12million in 2010,
US$11million in 2011, US$2million in 2013
A discount rate of 15%
Revenues from the cable begin in 2013 (they could start in mid 2012 if the
cable is commissioned on time)
Average geostationary satellite transponder costs: US$2000 per month per
Mbit/s.
Cost for capacity on existing West African cables landing in nearby countries
(MainOne/SAT-3): US$280-800 per month per Mbit/s.
7. Enhanced connections to West Africa‟s submarine fiber-cable systems for The
Gambia breakeven between 2019 and 2020 after which substantial revenues
would be made if wholesale pricing levels are maintained. The IRR is 28.8%
assuming an average bandwidth sale price of US$100/Mbit/s/month, and an IRR of
19.9%, assuming US$50/Mbit/s/month. For The Gambia, pricing capacity on ACE
for traffic with Europe in the US$50/Mbit/s/month range is likely to be sustainable
and would stimulate more use19
. This also takes into account bandwidth pricing trends
in other regions such as East Africa. For The Gambia, the final breakeven year will
depend on actual capacity uptake and the wholesale price of bandwidth. After 2024 at
the latest, the projects would be cash-flow positive and substantial revenues would be
made if these wholesale pricing levels are maintained.
19 It can be noted that the investment in the cable is a „sunk‟ cost that provides an initial fixed 5.9Gbit/s
of bandwidth, so downstream prices can be reduced as much as possible to maximise use of this available
capacity.
58
Table 7.2: Bandwidth demand forecast for The Gambia
Estimate Basis
International
Bandwidth
(Mbit/s)
Estimated number
of Subscribers
Penetration
(%population) Population
International
Kbit/s/ Subscriber
Bps/ total
population
Current Status in Gambia (2010) 155 15,000 0.82% 1,828,000 85
Senegal comparison (2009) 3,500 54,200 0.40 13,700,000 65 255
2021 Forecasts:
Expanded cross border link to Senegal 900 38,403 2 2,453,313 23 367
ACE Fiber 22,000 268,824 11 2,453,313 82 8,967
Bandwidth Requirement Estimates Based on (cross check):
Low Broadband Definition (256Kbit/s), Low Penetration Scenario (10%) 2,010 245,331 10.00 2,453,313 205 819
Low Broadband Definition (256Kbit/s), Low-Medium Penetration Scenario
(20%) 3,517 490,663 20.00 6,647,190 179 529
Medium Broadband Definition (1Mbit/s), Low Penetration Scenario (10%) 7,851 245,331 10.00 6,647,190 800 1181
Medium Broadband Definition (1Mbit/s), Low-Medium Penetration Scenario
(20%) 13,739 490,663 20.00 2,453,313 700 5600
Optimal Broadband Definition (20Mbit/s) Low Penetration Scenario (10%) 157,012 245,331 10.00 2,453,313 16000 64000
Medium Broadband Definition (1Mbit/s), Medium Penetration Scenario (40%) 19,627 981,325 40.00 2,453,313 500 8000
Optimal Broadband Definition (20Mbit/s) Medium Penetration Scenario (40%) 392,530 981,325 40.00 2,453,313 10000 160000
59
8. Previous experience with fiber cables shows a rapid increase in demand when price of bandwidth
decreases. As indicated above, lowering the cost of access has a strong impact on the amount of
bandwidth sold. This can be modeled using a price elasticity curve. The SAT-3 example (SAT-3 is
between Portugal and South Africa), for which the most data is available, shows a clear relationship
between volume and tariffs. The chart below compares the price of access on SAT-3 (per E1 half-circuit
to Sessimbra, Portugal) against the volume of international bandwidth sold. This shows the effect that
price decreases between 2004 and 2006 have had on the volume of bandwidth sold in each of four
countries where comparable data was available. The increase in international bandwidth demand
increases because broadband services first become more viable for operators to deploy, and secondly
because as retail prices decrease the service become increasingly affordable and penetration increases.
Réunion is included here as a particularly clear case which shows that when price was US$20,466 per
Mb the volume was just 4 Mbit/s, but when it decreased to US$1,967 volume increased to 180 Mbit/s. If
the price were to drop further to US$500 per Mbit/s, it is projected that the volume would increase to
1.656 Gbit/s. If the price were to decrease to US$250 per Mbit/s per month, the volume is projected to
grow to 5.02 Gbit/s, which translates to a 50% price reduction resulting in a 300% increase in bandwidth
demand. This increase comes about because of the multiplier effects: monthly prices for broadband
decrease, in turn improving affordability and increasing uptake of services.
Figure 7.1: Bandwidth Price Elasticity
9. The predicted bandwidth demand for The Gambia with direct access to fiber is 22,000 Mbit/s
compared to 900 Mbit/s with satellite or expanded cross border link with Senegal. Extrapolating
current usage and growth in users could provide an indication of future bandwidth demand, however due
to the current high cost of service (relative to income levels) and the relatively slow speeds available, this
would tend to substantially underestimate pent-up demand when bandwidth availability improves and
costs decrease. Given the trends worldwide in broadband adoption levels, and especially encouraged by
the explosion of mobile broadband20
(3G), the estimates used appear relatively conservative, especially
toward the end of the analysis period (2021), by which date it is expected that almost every mobile phone
20
3G data service uptake from the consumer has been massive and unprecedented in other developing countries such as Kenya.
Price Elasticity On Sat-3
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
- 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Volume (Mbps)
Pri
ce (
US
$ p
er
mo
nth
)
Ghana Nigeria
Reunion South Africa
Nigeria PE South Africa PE
Ghana PE Reunion PE
60
user would have access to broadband on their handset21
. However, this is dependent on the introduction
of high-bit-rate mobile services into the market, and unless increased competition is introduced into the
sector, the operators may not be encouraged to introduce these types of new services in the near future.
Extrapolating current usage and growth in users could provide an indication of future bandwidth demand,
however due to the current high cost of service (relative to income levels) and the relatively slow speeds
available, this would tend to substantially underestimate pent-up demand when bandwidth availability
improves and costs decrease. Globally, the last 10 years has seen massive increases in end-user
bandwidth demand resulting from the popularity of social networks, image and video sites such as
FaceBook and YouTube. Fortunately these bandwidth demands have kept pace with technology
developments which are now seeing domestic broadband services delivering 100Mbit/s and even 1Gbit/s
in some advanced countries. Given the trends worldwide in broadband adoption levels, especially
encouraged by the explosion of mobile broadband22
(3G/4G/LTE), the estimates used in this analysis
appear relatively conservative, especially toward the end of the forecast period, when it is expected that
almost every mobile phone user would have access to broadband on their handset23
. This also follows
current trends which show that 2010 traffic in Africa and the Middle-East grew by 45%, this includes
many countries which already have fiber access, so the growth rates for those which will have access to
fiber for the first time are expected to be much higher.
10. Bandwidth requirement per user has the potential to advance rapidly with further social and
economic development, especially with the development of The Gambia‟s tourism and BPO sector.
There can be a wide divergence in forecasting bandwidth requirements per user. The last 10 years has
seen massive increases in end-user bandwidth demand resulting from the popularity of social network,
image and video sites such as FaceBook and YouTube. Fortunately, these bandwidth demands have kept
pace with technology developments which are now seeing domestic broadband services delivering
100Mbit/s and even 1Gbit/s in some advanced countries. If we assume that The Gambia will have the
opportunity catch up at least partially with these developments over the next decade then we can expect a
relatively high level of growth in bandwidth use. There are also some special sources of additional
demand which could also significantly increase international transmission requirement: Tourism and
development of Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) sector. Tourism is currently a significant part of the
economy in The Gambia (with the service sector contributed to over 50% of the economy), and tourism
in The Gambia and West Africa could increase significantly in future. Tourism creates demand for
international telecommunication services through demand of administrative and marketing service as
well as demand for internet access, international calls and money transactions. BPO and Internet call
centre service companies can generate significantly more Internet traffic if bandwidth prices can be
reduced and fiber connections made available. Sourcing channels for television rebroadcasting is
currently carried out by satellite but could be substituted by fiber if bandwidth prices are sufficiently
competitive. Finally, it is worth noting that also expected to contribute to increased bandwidth demand is
Ministry of Information and Communication Infrastructure (MoICI) ambitious program to become the
„Silicon Valley of Africa‟ focusing on human resource development, e-education (including provision of
Internet connections to all schools and tertiary institutions), and community-use of ICTs. As part of this
MoICI is participating in the AU‟s e-health network supported by the government of India, developing a
Technology Park with support from the governments of Egypt and Taiwan, China. MoICI is also
21
Brand new 3G capable smartphones are already being sold in Kenya for less than $100, and prices are expected to come down much further over
the next 10 years.
22 3G data service uptake from the consumer has been massive and unprecedented in other developing countries such as Kenya, and in Nigeria the
majority of Internet access now takes place via 3G.
61
working to establish e-government applications, an IXP and provision of ICT training facilities. Gambia
will also be hosting one of the network operations centers of the Regional African Satellite
Communications Organization‟s satellite system for which the government has already made land and
funds available.
11. Fast internet has been shown to boost the productivity of firms as well as generate employment
opportunities. New growth theory suggests that long-run economic growth emanates from spillover
arising from innovation and investment in new technologies. Fast internet access can be considered one
important new technology, and broadband is increasingly recognized to promote productivity and boost
aggregate economic growth (OECD, 2003). Analytical studies have shown that firms using standard
broadband (defined as connection speeds above 256 Kbit/s (OECD, 2002) were on average 10 % more
productive than firms using dial-up internet access. Faster internet speeds are also causally related to
increased employment opportunities with analysis showing that for every one percentage point increase
in broadband penetration within a region, employment increases by 0.2-0.3 % per year for the private,
non-farm economy (Crandall et al, 2007). Indeed, studies show a clear positive relationship between
employment and broadband penetration in the manufacturing and service industries, with business
growth shown to be particularly significant for larger businesses and for IT intensive sector (Lehr et al,
2006). The results of these studies support the hypothesis that broadband penetration enhances economic
activity. Increased broadband speeds and less expensive data access have the potential to promote
economic activities in West Africa, supporting the growth and productivity of businesses and gradual
transfer of employment from agricultural to service industries and expansion of the region‟s nascent ICT
and BPO sector.
KartungKartung
KalagiKalagi
SukutaSukuta
DiabuguDiabugu
FarafenniFarafenni
BrikamaBrikama
KerewanKerewan MansaMansaKonkoKonko
Basse Santa SuBasse Santa Su
BANJULBANJULN O R T H B A N K D I V I S I O NN O R T H B A N K D I V I S I O N
W E S T E R NW E S T E R ND I V I S I O ND I V I S I O N
L O W E R R I V E RL O W E R R I V E RD I V I S I O ND I V I S I O N
U P P E R R I V E RU P P E R R I V E RD I V I S I O ND I V I S I O N
C E N T R A L R I V E RC E N T R A L R I V E RD I V I S I O ND I V I S I O N
JanjanburehJanjanbureh
Kartung
Kalagi
Sukuta
Diabugu
Farafenni
Brikama
Kerewan
Janjanbureh
MansaKonko
Kanifing
Basse Santa Su
BANJUL
S E N E G A L
S E N E G A L
G U I N E A - B I S S A U
N O R T H B A N K D I V I S I O N
W E S T E R ND I V I S I O N
C I T Y O FB A N J U L
K A N I F I N GM U N I C I PA L I T Y
L O W E R R I V E RD I V I S I O N
U P P E R R I V E RD I V I S I O N
C E N T R A L R I V E RD I V I S I O N
Gambia
Gambia
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
To Kaolack
To Kaolack
To Kolda
To Kolda
To Bignona
To Bignona
14°N
13°N
14°N
13°N
17°W 16°W 15°W 14°W
17°W 16°W 15°W 14°W
THEGAMBIA
This map was produced by the Map Design Unit of The World Bank. The boundaries, colors, denominations and any other informationshown on this map do not imply, on the part of The World BankGroup, any judgment on the legal status of any territory, or anyendorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
0 10 20 30
0 10 20 30 Miles
40 Kilometers
IBRD 33409R
NO
VEM
BER 2006
THE GAMBIASELECTED CITIES AND TOWNS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA“DIVISION” HEADQUARTERS
NATIONAL CAPITAL
RIVERS
MAIN ROADS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA“DIVISION” BOUNDARIES
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES