Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

80
15-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Forecasting Chapter 15

Transcript of Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

Page 1: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-1Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Forecasting

Chapter 15

Page 2: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-2

■Forecasting Components

■Time Series Methods

■Forecast Accuracy

■Time Series Forecasting Using Excel

■Time Series Forecasting Using QM for

Windows

■Regression Methods

Chapter Topics

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 3: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-3

■ A variety of forecasting methods are available for use depending on the time frame of the forecast and the existence of patterns.

■ Time Frames:

Short-range (one to two months) Medium-range (two months to one or two

years) Long-range (more than one or two years)

■ Patterns:

Trend Random variations Cycles Seasonal pattern

Forecasting Components

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 4: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-4

Trend - A long-term movement of the item being forecast.

Random variations - movements that are not predictable and follow no pattern.

Cycle - A movement, up or down, that repeats itself over a lengthy time span.

Seasonal pattern - Oscillating movement in demand that occurs periodically in the short run and is repetitive.

Forecasting ComponentsPatterns (1 of 2)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 5: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-5

Figure 15.1 (a) Trend; (b) Cycle; (c) Seasonal; (d) Trend w/Season

Forecasting ComponentsPatterns (2 of 2)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 6: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-6

Forecasting ComponentsForecasting Methods

Times Series - Statistical techniques that use historical data to predict future behavior.

Regression Methods - Regression (or causal ) methods that attempt to develop a mathematical relationship between the item being forecast and factors that cause it to behave the way it does.

Qualitative Methods - Methods using judgment, expertise and opinion to make forecasts.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 7: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-7

Forecasting ComponentsQualitative Methods

“Jury of executive opinion,” a qualitative technique, is the most common type of forecast for long-term strategic planning. Performed by individuals or groups within an

organization, sometimes assisted by consultants and other experts, whose judgments and opinions are considered valid for the forecasting issue.

Usually includes specialty functions such as marketing, engineering, purchasing, etc. in which individuals have experience and knowledge of the forecasted item.

Supporting techniques include the Delphi Method, market research, surveys, etc.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 8: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-8

Time Series MethodsOverview

Statistical techniques that make use of historical data collected over a long period of time.

Methods assume that what has occurred in the past will continue to occur in the future.

Forecasts based on only one factor - time.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 9: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-9

i periodin data average moving in the periods ofnumber

:where

1

iDn

n

n

i iD

nMA

Time Series MethodsMoving Average (1 of 5)

Moving average uses values from the recent past to develop forecasts.

This dampens or smoothes random increases and decreases.

Useful for forecasting relatively stable items that do not display any trend or seasonal pattern.

Formula for:

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 10: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-10

Example: Instant Paper Clip Supply Company forecast of orders for the month of November.

Three-month moving average:

Five-month moving average:

orders 1103

130110903

3

13

iiD

MA

orders 915

5075130110905

5

15

iiD

MA

Time Series MethodsMoving Average (2 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 11: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-11

Table 15.2 Three- and Five-Month Moving Averages

Time Series MethodsMoving Average (3 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 12: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-12

Figure 15.2 Three- and Five-Month Moving Averages

Time Series MethodsMoving Average (4 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 13: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-13

Time Series MethodsMoving Average (5 of 5)

Longer-period moving averages react more slowly to changes in demand than do shorter-period moving averages.

The appropriate number of periods to use often requires trial-and-error experimentation.

Moving average does not react well to changes (trends, seasonal effects, etc.) but is easy to use and inexpensive.

Good for short-term forecasting.Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 14: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-14

In a weighted moving average, weights are assigned to the most recent data.

Determining precise weights and number of periods requires trial-and-error experimentation.

1

where the weight for period i, between 0% and 100%

1.00

Example: Paper clip company weights 50% for October, 33%for September, 17% for August:

3 (.50)(90) (.33)(110)

13

nWMA W Dn i ii

Wi

Wi

WMA W Di ii

(.17)(130) 103.4 orders

Time Series MethodsWeighted Moving Average

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 15: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-15

Exponential smoothing weights recent past data more strongly than more distant data.

Two forms: simple exponential smoothing and adjusted exponential smoothing.

Simple exponential smoothing:

Ft + 1 = Dt + (1 - )Ft

where: Ft + 1 = the forecast for the next period

Dt = actual demand in the present period

Ft = the previously determined forecast for the present period

= a weighting factor (smoothing constant).

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (1 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 16: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-16

The most commonly used values of are between 0.10 and 0.50.

Determination of is usually judgmental and subjective and often based on trial-and -error experimentation.

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (2 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 17: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-17

Example: PM Computer Services (see Table 15.4). Exponential smoothing forecasts using smoothing

constant of .30.

Forecast for period 2 (February):

F2 = D1 + (1- )F1 = (.30)(.37) + (.70)(.37) = 37 units

Forecast for period 3 (March):

F3 = D2 + (1- )F2 = (.30)(.40) + (.70)(37) = 37.9 units

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (3 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 18: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-18

Table 15.4 Exponential Smoothing Forecasts, = .30 and = .50

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (4 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 19: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-19

The forecast that uses the higher smoothing constant (.50) reacts more strongly to changes in demand than does the forecast with the lower constant (.30).

Both forecasts lag behind actual demand.

Both forecasts tend to be consistently lower than actual demand.

Low smoothing constants are appropriate for stable data without trend; higher constants appropriate for data with trends.

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (5 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 20: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-20

Figure 15.3 Exponential Smoothing Forecasts

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (6 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 21: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-21

■ Adjusted exponential smoothing: exponential smoothing with a trend adjustment factor added.

Formula:

AFt + 1 = Ft + 1 + Tt+1

where: T = an exponentially smoothed trend factor

Tt + 1 + (Ft + 1 - Ft) + (1 - )Tt

Tt = the last period trend factor = smoothing constant for trend ( a

value between zero and one).

■ Reflects the weight given to the most recent trend data.

■ Determined subjectively.

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (7 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 22: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-22

Example: PM Computer Services exponential smoothed

forecasts with = .50 and = .30 (see Table 15.5).

Adjusted forecast for period 3:

T3 = (F3 - F2) + (1 - )T2

= (.30)(38.5 - 37.0) + (.70)(0) = 0.45

AF3 = F3 + T3 = 38.5 + 0.45 = 38.95

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (8 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 23: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-23

Table 15.5 Adjusted Exponentially Smoothed Forecast Values

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (9 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 24: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-24

■ Adjusted forecast is consistently higher than the simple exponentially smoothed forecast.

■ It is more reflective of the generally increasing trend of the data.

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (10 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 25: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-25

Figure 15.4 Adjusted Exponentially Smoothed Forecast

Time Series MethodsExponential Smoothing (11 of 11)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 26: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-26

xperiod for demand for forecast

period time the line the of slope

0) period (at intercept :where

yxba

bxay

nyynx

n

xbyaxnx

yxnxyb

x

periods of number :where

2

■ When demand displays an obvious trend over time, a least squares regression line , or linear trend line, can be used to forecast.

■ Formula:

Time Series MethodsLinear Trend Line (1 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 27: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-27

Example: PM Computer Services (see Table 15.6)

565713721235 13, x 13, period for

line trend linear 721235

235567214246

72125612650

42465612867322

424612557 56

1278

.)(..

..

.).)(.(.

.).(

).)(.)((,

..

y

xy

xbya

xnx

yxnxyb

yx

Time Series MethodsLinear Trend Line (2 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 28: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-28

Table 15.6Least Squares Calculations

Time Series MethodsLinear Trend Line (3 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 29: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-29

■ A trend line does not adjust to a change in the trend as does the exponential smoothing method.

■ This limits its use to shorter time frames in which trend will not change.

Time Series MethodsLinear Trend Line (4 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 30: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-30

Figure 15.5 Linear Trend Line

Time Series MethodsLinear Trend (5 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 31: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-31

■ A seasonal pattern is a repetitive up-and-down movement in demand.

■ Seasonal patterns can occur on a quarterly, monthly, weekly, or daily basis.

■ A seasonally adjusted forecast can be developed by multiplying the normal forecast by a seasonal factor.

■ A seasonal factor can be determined by dividing the actual demand for each seasonal period by total annual demand:

Si =Di/D

Time Series MethodsSeasonal Adjustments (1 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 32: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-32

■ Seasonal factors lie between zero and one and represent the portion of total annual demand assigned to each season.

■ Seasonal factors are multiplied by annual demand to provide adjusted forecasts for each period.

Time Series MethodsSeasonal Adjustments (2 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 33: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-33

S1 = D1/ D = 42.0/148.7 = 0.28 S2 = D2/ D = 29.5/148.7 = 0.20 S3 = D3/ D = 21.9/148.7 = 0.15 S4 = D4/ D = 55.3/148.7 = 0.37

Table 15.7 Demand for Turkeys at Wishbone Farms

Example: Wishbone Farms

Time Series MethodsSeasonal Adjustments (3 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 34: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-34

Multiply forecasted demand for entire year by seasonal factors to determine quarterly demand.

Forecast for entire year (trend line for data in Table 15.7):

y = 40.97 + 4.30x = 40.97 + 4.30(4) = 58.17 Seasonally adjusted forecasts:

SF1 = (S1)(F5) = (.28)(58.17) = 16.28

SF2 = (S2)(F5) = (.20)(58.17) = 11.63

SF3 = (S3)(F5) = (.15)(58.17) = 8.73

SF4 = (S4)(F5) = (.37)(58.17) = 21.53

Time Series MethodsSeasonal Adjustments (4 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 35: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-35

Forecasts will always deviate from actual values. Difference between forecasts and actual values

referred to as forecast error. Would like forecast error to be as small as possible. If error is large, either technique being used is

the wrong one, or parameters need adjusting. Measures of forecast errors:

Mean Absolute deviation (MAD) Mean absolute percentage deviation

(MAPD) Cumulative error (E bar) Average error, or bias (E)

Forecast AccuracyOverview

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 36: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-36

MAD is the average absolute difference between the forecast and actual demand.

Most popular and simplest-to-use measures of forecast error.

Formula:

periods ofnumber total then tperiodfor forecast the tF

tperiodin demand tD number period the t

:where

n

tFtDMAD

Forecast AccuracyMean Absolute Deviation (1 of 7)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 37: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-37

Example: PM Computer Services (see Table 15.8).

Compare accuracies of different forecasts using MAD:

85.411

53.41 n

tFtDMAD

Forecast AccuracyMean Absolute Deviation (2 of 7)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 38: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-38

Table 15.8 Computational Values for MAD and error

Forecast AccuracyMean Absolute Deviation (3 of 7)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 39: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-39

The lower the value of MAD relative to the magnitude of the data, the more accurate the forecast.

When viewed alone, MAD is difficult to assess.

Must be considered in light of magnitude of the data.

Forecast AccuracyMean Absolute Deviation (4 of 7)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 40: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-40

Can be used to compare accuracy of different forecasting techniques working on the same set of demand data (PM Computer Services):

Exponential smoothing ( = .50): MAD = 4.04

Adjusted exponential smoothing ( = .50, = .30): MAD = 3.81

Linear trend line: MAD = 2.29

Linear trend line has lowest MAD; increasing from .30 to .50 improved smoothed forecast.

Forecast AccuracyMean Absolute Deviation (5 of 7)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 41: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-41

A variation on MAD is the mean absolute percent deviation (MAPD).

Measures absolute error as a percentage of demand rather than per period.

Eliminates problem of interpreting the measure of accuracy relative to the magnitude of the demand and forecast values.

Formula:

10.3%or 103.520

41.53

tDtFtDMAPD

Forecast AccuracyMean Absolute Deviation (6 of 7)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 42: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-42

MAPD for other three forecasts:

Exponential smoothing ( = .50): MAPD = 8.5%

Adjusted exponential smoothing ( = .50, = .30): MAPD = 8.1%

Linear trend: MAPD = 4.9%

Forecast AccuracyMean Absolute Deviation (7 of 7)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 43: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-43

Cumulative error is the sum of the forecast errors (E =et).

A relatively large positive value indicates forecast is biased low, a large negative value indicates forecast is biased high.

If preponderance of errors are positive, forecast is consistently low; and vice versa.

Cumulative error for trend line is always almost zero, and is therefore not a good measure for this method.

Cumulative error for PM Computer Services can be read directly from Table 15.8.

E = et = 49.31 indicating forecasts are frequently below actual demand.

Forecast AccuracyCumulative Error (1 of 2)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 44: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-44

Cumulative error for other forecasts:

Exponential smoothing ( = .50): E = 33.21

Adjusted exponential smoothing ( = .50, =.30):

E = 21.14 Average error (bias) is the per period average of

cumulative error. Average error for exponential smoothing forecast:

A large positive value of average error indicates a forecast is biased low; a large negative error indicates it is biased high.

Forecast AccuracyCumulative Error (2 of 2)

48.411

31.49

nteE

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 45: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-45

Results consistent for all forecasts:

Larger value of alpha is preferable.

Adjusted forecast is more accurate than exponential smoothing.

Linear trend is more accurate than all the others.

Table 15.9 Comparison of Forecasts for PM Computer Services

Forecast AccuracyExample Forecasts by Different Measures

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 46: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-46

Exhibit 15.1

Time Series Forecasting Using Excel (1 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 47: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-47

Exhibit 15.2

Time Series Forecasting Using Excel (2 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 48: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-48

Exhibit 15.3

Time Series Forecasting Using Excel (3 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 49: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-49

Exhibit 15.4

Time Series Forecasting Using Excel (4 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 50: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-50

Exhibit 15.5

Exponential Smoothing Forecast with Excel QM

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 51: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-51

Time Series ForecastingSolution with QM for Windows (1 of 2)

Exhibit 15.6Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 52: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-52

Exhibit 15.7

Time Series ForecastingSolution with QM for Windows (2 of 2)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 53: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-53

Time series techniques relate a single variable being forecast to time.

Regression is a forecasting technique that measures the relationship of one variable to one or more other variables.

Simplest form of regression is linear regression.

Regression MethodsOverview

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 54: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-54

data y the of mean

data x the of mean

:where

22

nyy

nxx

xnx

yxnxyb

xbya

bxay

Linear regression relates demand (dependent variable ) to an independent variable.

Regression MethodsLinear Regression

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 55: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-55

State University Athletic Department.

Wins Attendance 4 6 6 8 6 7 5 7

36,300 40,100 41,200 53,000 44,000 45,600 39,000 47,500

x (wins)

y (attendance, 1,000s)

xy

x2

4 6 6 8 6 7 5 7

49

36.3 40.1 41.2 53.0 44.0 45.6 39.0 47.5 346.7

145.2 240.6 247.2 424.0 264.0 319.2 195.0 332.5

2,167.7

16 36 36 64 36 49 25 49

311

Regression MethodsLinear Regression Example (1 of 3)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 56: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-56

88046 or 884670644618is wins7 x for forecast Attendance

0644618 Therefore,

461812564063443

064212568311

34431256870167222

34438

9346

1256849

,.)(..

..

.).)((..

.).)(()(

).)(.)((.,(

..

.

y

xy

xbya

xnx

yxnxyb

y

x

Regression MethodsLinear Regression Example (2 of 3)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 57: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-57

Figure 15.6Linear Regression Line

Regression MethodsLinear Regression Example (3 of 3)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 58: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-58

Correlation is a measure of the strength of the relationship between independent and dependent variables.

Formula:

Value lies between +1 and -1. Value of zero indicates little or no relationship

between variables. Values near 1.00 and -1.00 indicate strong linear

relationship.

2222 yynxxn

yxxynr

Regression MethodsCorrelation (1 of 2)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 59: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-59

948.2)7.346()7.224,15)(8()49)(49()311)(8(

)7.346)(49()7.167,2)(8(

r

Value for State University example:

Regression MethodsCorrelation (2 of 2)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 60: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-60

The Coefficient of determination is the percentage of the variation in the dependent variable that results from the independent variable.

Computed by squaring the correlation coefficient, r.

For State University example:

r = .948, r2 = .899 This value indicates that 89.9% of the amount of

variation in attendance can be attributed to the number of wins by the team, with the remaining 10.1% due to other, unexplained, factors.

Regression MethodsCoefficient of Determination

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 61: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-61

Regression Analysis with Excel (1 of 6)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Exhibit 15.8

Page 62: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-62

Regression Analysis with Excel (2 of 6)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Exhibit 15.9

Page 63: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-63

Exhibit 15.10

Regression Analysis with Excel (3 of 6)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 64: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-64

Exhibit 15.11

Regression Analysis with Excel (4 of 6)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 65: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-65

Exhibit 15.12

Regression Analysis with Excel (5 of 6)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 66: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-66

Exhibit 15.13

Regression Analysis with Excel (6 of 6)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 67: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-67

Multiple Regression with Excel (1 of 4)

Multiple regression relates demand to two or more independent variables.

General form:

y = 0 + 1x1 + 2x2 + . . . + kxk

where 0 = the intercept

1 . . . k = parameters representing contributions of

the independent variables

x1 . . . xk = independent variables

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 68: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-68

State University example:

Wins Promotion ($) Attendance 4 6 6 8 6 7 5 7

29,500 55,700 71,300 87,000 75,000 72,000 55,300 81,600

36,300 40,100 41,200 53,000 44,000 45.600 39,000 47,500

Multiple Regression with Excel (2 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 69: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-69

Exhibit 15.14

Multiple Regression with Excel (3 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 70: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-70

Exhibit 15.15

Multiple Regression with Excel (4 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 71: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-71

Period Units 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

56 61 55 70 66 65 72 75

Problem Statement: For data below, develop an exponential smoothing

forecast using = .40, and an adjusted exponential smoothing forecast using = .40 and = .20.

Compare the accuracy of the forecasts using MAD and cumulative error.

Example Problem SolutionComputer Software Firm (1 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 72: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-72

Step 1: Compute the Exponential Smoothing Forecast.

Ft+1 = Dt + (1 - )Ft

Step 2: Compute the Adjusted Exponential Smoothing

Forecast

AFt+1 = Ft +1 + Tt+1

Tt+1 = (Ft +1 - Ft) + (1 - )Tt

Example Problem SolutionComputer Software Firm (2 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 73: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-73

Period Dt Ft AFt Dt - Ft Dt - AFt 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

56 61 55 70 66 65 72 75

56.00 58.00 56.80 62.08 63.65 64.18 67.31 70.39

56.00 58.40 56.88 63.20 64.86 65.26 68.80 72.19

5.00

-3.00 13.20

3.92 1.35 7.81 7.68

35.97

5.00

-3.40 13.12

2.80 0.14 6.73 6.20

30.60

Example Problem SolutionComputer Software Firm (3 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 74: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-74

Step 3: Compute the MAD Values

Step 4: Compute the Cumulative Error.

E(Ft) = 35.97

E(AFt) = 30.60

34.5739.37)(

99.5797.41)(

ntAFtD

tAFMAD

ntFtD

tFMAD

Example Problem SolutionComputer Software Firm (4 of 4)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 75: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-75

For the following data: Develop a linear regression model Determine the strength of the linear

relationship using correlation. Determine a forecast for lumber given 10

building permits in the next quarter.

Example Problem SolutionBuilding Products Store (1 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 76: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-76

Quarter

Building Permits, x

Lumber Sales (1,000s of bd ft), y

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10

8 12 7 9 15 6 5 8 10 12

12.6 16.3 9.3 11.5 18.1 7.6 6.2 14.2 15.0 17.8

Example Problem SolutionBuilding Products Store (2 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 77: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-77

Step 1: Compute the Components of the Linear Regression Equation.

361292518612

25122910932

861229103290122

861210

6128

921092

.).)(.(.

.).)(()(

).)(.)(().,(

..

xbya

xnx

yxnxyb

y

x

Example Problem SolutionBuilding Products Store (3 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 78: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-78

Step 2: Develop the Linear regression equation.

y = a + bx, y = 1.36 + 1.25x

Step 3: Compute the Correlation Coefficient.

2222 yynxxn

yxxynr

9252612848810110929293210

6128923170110 .).().,)(())(())((

).)(().,)((

r

Example Problem SolutionBuilding Products Store (4 of 5)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 79: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-79

Example Problem SolutionBuilding Products Store (5 of 5)

Step 4: Calculate the forecast for x = 10 permits.

Y = a + bx = 1.36 + 1.25(10) = 13.86 or 1,386 board ft

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 80: Taylor Introms10 Ppt 15

15-80

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall