T HE C OURT ’ S P ROCEDURES Submitting Briefs − Legal arguments on the case − Parties not...

6
THE COURT’S PROCEDURES Submitting Briefs Legal arguments on the case Parties not directly involved may submit amicus curiae Oral Arguments The Conference Justices meet to discuss cases on Fridays Writing the Opinion Unanimous opinion Majority opinion Concurring opinion Dissenting opinion

Transcript of T HE C OURT ’ S P ROCEDURES Submitting Briefs − Legal arguments on the case − Parties not...

Page 1: T HE C OURT ’ S P ROCEDURES Submitting Briefs − Legal arguments on the case − Parties not directly involved may submit amicus curiae Oral Arguments The.

THE COURT’S PROCEDURES• Submitting Briefs

−Legal arguments on the case−Parties not directly involved may submit

amicus curiae

• Oral Arguments

• The Conference−Justices meet to discuss cases on Fridays

• Writing the Opinion−Unanimous opinion−Majority opinion−Concurring opinion−Dissenting opinion

Page 2: T HE C OURT ’ S P ROCEDURES Submitting Briefs − Legal arguments on the case − Parties not directly involved may submit amicus curiae Oral Arguments The.

GETTING CASES TO THE COURT• Fall under Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction

• Writ of certiorari− Order from the court to send the records for a case up− Generally select very few

• On Appeal

• The Solicitor General− Appointed by the President and represents the federal

government− Determines if lower federal court decisions should be

appealed

• Rule of Four− If four of nine justices agree to accept the case, they will

hear it− Either ask for more information or rule on info already

available• Per curiam opinion – a brief, unsigned opinion

Page 3: T HE C OURT ’ S P ROCEDURES Submitting Briefs − Legal arguments on the case − Parties not directly involved may submit amicus curiae Oral Arguments The.

TOOLS FOR SHAPING POLICY• 3 Ways Supreme Court Determines Policy

−Using judicial review•Ruled Abraham Lincoln could not suspend

certain civil rights−Interpreting the meaning of laws

•Decipher loose wording

−Over-ruling previous decisions•Stare decisis – let the

decision stand−Previous decisions

create a precedent

Page 4: T HE C OURT ’ S P ROCEDURES Submitting Briefs − Legal arguments on the case − Parties not directly involved may submit amicus curiae Oral Arguments The.

INFLUENCING PUBLIC POLICY

Page 5: T HE C OURT ’ S P ROCEDURES Submitting Briefs − Legal arguments on the case − Parties not directly involved may submit amicus curiae Oral Arguments The.

LIMITS ON THE SUPREME COURT• Limits on Types of Issues

−Minor role in foreign policy−Bulk of cases are civil liberties

• Limits on Types of Cases−Decision must make a difference−The plaintiff must have suffered real

harm−Must involve a substantial federal

question−Will not decide on issues the executive

or legislative branch can decide

Page 6: T HE C OURT ’ S P ROCEDURES Submitting Briefs − Legal arguments on the case − Parties not directly involved may submit amicus curiae Oral Arguments The.

LIMITS ON THE SUPREME COURT

• Limited Control Over Agenda−Wait for cases to arrive to their desk

• Lack of Enforcement Power−Lower court judges may ignore decisions−President and Congress can fail to

enforce decisions

• Checks and Balances−President appoints justices−Congress approves appointments and

can impeach and remove