SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS Law 174 (Remedial Law 4)

Prof. Chrysilla Carissa P. Bautista 1

2nd Semester, AY 2013-2014

Course Description: The study of different proceedings, including insolvency and arbitration, together with supplementary rules as found in the Rules of Court.2

Laws and Rules Covered:

RULES OF COURT, Rules 72- 109 Batas Pamb. Big. 129 (1980), as amended Rep. Act No. 8369 (1997) (The Family Courts Act of 1997) A.M. No. 02-11-1 0-SC dated 4 March 2003 (Rule on Declaration of Absolute Nullity of

Void Marriages and Annulment of Voidable Marriages) A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC dated 4 March 2003 (Rule on Legal Separation) A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC dated 4 March 2003 (Rule on Provisional Orders) Rep. Act No. 8552 (1998) (Domestic Adoption Act of 1998) Rep. Act No. 8043 (1995) (Inter-Country Adoption Act of 1995) Rep. Act No. 9523 (2009) (An Act Requiring Certification of the Department of Social

Welfare and Development to Declare a Child Legally Available for Adoption) A.M. No. 02-6-02-SC dated 31 July 2002 (Rule on Adoption) A.M. No. 03-02-05-SC dated 1 April 2003 (Rule on Guardianship of Minors) A.M. No. 02-1-19-SC dated 28 February 2002 ,(Rule on Commitment of Children) A.M. No. 03-04-04-SC dated 22 April 2003 "(Rule on Custody of Minors and Writ of

Habeas Corpus In Relation To Custody of Minors) A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC dated 25 September 2007 (Rule on the Writ of Amparo) A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC dated 22 January 2008 (Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data) Rep. Act No. 9048 (2001) (Clerical Error Law) Rep. Act No. 10142 (201 0) (Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 201 0) A.M. No. 12-12-11-SC dated 27 August 2013 (Financial Rehabilitation Rules of

Procedure) A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC dated 1 September 2009 (Special ADR Rules)

Also Read:

A.M. No. 11 -6-10-SC dated 21 February 2012 (Guidelines for Litigation in Quezon City Trial Courts)

A.M. No. 12-8-8-SC dated 4 September 2012 (Judicial Affidavit Rule)

Grade Components: Recitation and/or Quizzes- 20% Final Exam (MCQ- 40%; Essay- 60%)- 80%

In preparing this Course Outline, Prof. Bautista referred to the course outlines prepared by the following: Prof. Antonio R. Bautista, Prof. Rogelio A. Vinluan, Prof. E. (Leo) D. Battad, Prof. Augusto A. San Pedro, Jr. and Prof. Dorothy Uy Nava. Also, underscored sub-headings with sub-topics were taken from the Supreme Court Syllabus for Remedial Law (Special Proceedings) for the 2013 Bar Examinations. UP College of Law, Catalog (2007).

PART ONE: INTRODUCTION

I. IN GENERAL- Rule 1, Sec. 3(c); Rule 72; Batas Pamb. Big. 129 (1980), as amended, Sees. 19 and 33

A. Jurisdiction

• Mendoza v. Teh, G.R. No. 122646, 14 March 1997, 269 SCRA 764 • Heirs of Yaptinchay v. Del Rosario, G.R. No. 124320, 2 March 1999, 304

SCRA 18 • Portugal v. Portugal-Beltran, G.R. No. 155555, 16 August 2005, 469

SCRA 194 • Reyes v. Enriquez, G.R. No. 162956, 10 April2008, 551 SCRA 85

B. Subject matter

• Hernaez Jr. v. lAC, G.R. No. 73864, 7 May 1992, 208 SCRA 449

C. Applicability of rules on civil actions

• Republic v. CA, G.R. No. 163604, 6 May 2005, 458 SCRA 200 • Sheker v. Estate of Sheker, G.R. No. 157912, 13 December 2007, 540

SCRA 111

D. Distinction from civil actions

• Hagans v. Wizlizemus, 42 Phil. 880 (1920) • Vda. de Manalo v. CA, G.R. No. 129242, 16 January 2001, 349 SCRA

135 • Natcher v. CA, G.R. No. 133000, 2 October 2001, 366 SCRA 385

PART TWO: RULES CONFERRING POWER OVER ANOTHER'S PROPERTY

II. SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE OF DECEASED PERSONS

A. Venue and process- Rule 73

1. Which court has jurisdiction 2. Venue in judicial settlement of estate 3. Extent of jurisdiction of probate court 4. Powers and duties of probate court

• Fule v. CA, G.R. No. L-40502, 29 November 1976, 74 SCRA 189 • Eusebio v. Eusebio, 100 Phil. 593 (1956) • Jao v. CA, G.R. No. 128314, 29 May 2002, 382 SCRA 407 • Malig v. Bush, G.R. No. L-22761, 31 May 1969, 28 SCRA 449 • Maloles II v. Phillips, G.R. No. 129505, 31 January 2000, 324 SCRA 172

2

• Uriarte v. CFI of Negros Occidental, G.R. Nos. L-21938-39, 29 May 1970, 33 SCRA 252

• Rodriguez v. De Borja, G.R. No. L-21993, 21 June 1966, 17 SCRA 418 • Bernardo v. CA, G.R. No. L-18148, 28 February 1963, 7 SCRA 367 • Jimenez v. lAC, G.R. No. 75773, 17 April1990, 184 SCRA 367 • Marcos II v. CA, G.R. No. 120880, 5 June 1997, 273 SCRA 47 • Alipio v. CA, G.R. No. 134100, 29 September 2000, 341 SCRA 441

B. Summary settlement of estates- Rule 74

1. Extrajudicial settlement by agreement between heirs, when allowed 2. Two-year prescriptive period 3. Affidavit of self-adjudication by sole heir 4. Summary settlement of estates of small value, when allowed 5. Remedies of aggrieved parties after extrajudicial settlement of estate

• Pereira v. CA, G.R. No. 81147, 20 June 1989, 174 SCRA 154 • Avelino v. CA, G.R. No. 115181 , 31 March 2000, 329 SCRA 369 • Rebong v. Ibanez, 79 Phil. 324 (1947) • Hernandez v. Andal, 78 Phil. 196 (1947) • Spouses Domingo v. Races, G.R. No. 147468, 9 April 2003, 401 SCRA

197 • Gerona v. De Guzman, G.R. No. L-19060, 20 May 1964, 11 SCRA 153 • Amerol v. Bagumbaran, G.R. No. L-3326, 30 September 1987, 154 SCRA

396

C. Production and probate of will - Rule 75

1. Nature of probate proceeding 2. Who may petition for probate; persons entitled to notice

• Fernandez v. Dimagiba, G.R. Nos. L-23638 and L-23662, 12 October 12, 1967, 21 SCRA 328

• Maninang v. CA, G.R. No. L-57848, 19 June 1982, 114 SCRA 478 • Rodelas v. Aranza, G.R. No. L-58509, 7 December 1982, 119 SCRA 16 • Alaban v. CA, G.R. No. 156021 , 23 September 2005, 470 SCRA 697 • Cuenca v. CA, G.R. No. L-24742, 26 October 26, 1973, 53 SCRA 260

D. Allowance or disallowance of will- Rules 76 & 77

1. Contents of petition for allowance of will 2. Grounds for disallowing a will 3. Reprobate

a. Requisites before a will proved abroad would be allowed in the Phil ippines

4. Effects of probate

• Guevara v. Guevara, 98 Phil. 249 (1956)

3

• Sumilang v. Ramagosa, G.R. No. L-23135, 26 December 1967, 21 SCRA 1369

• Suntay v. Suntay, 95 Phil. 500 ( 1954) • In Re: In The Matter of the Petition to Approve the Will of Ruperta

Palaganas, G.R. No. 169144, 26 January 2011, 640 SCRA 538 • Alto-Yap v. Gan, 104 Phil. 509 (1958) • Kiao Eng v. Lee, G.R. No. 176831, 15 January 2010,610 SCRA 211 • Gallanosa v. Arcangel, G.R. No. L-29300, 21 June 1978, 83 SCRA 676 • Nepomuceno v. CA, G.R. No. L-62952, 9 October 1985, 139 SCRA 206

E. Letters testamentary and of administration - Rules 78 - 85

1. When and to whom letters of administration granted - Rule 78

• Lim v. Diaz-Millarez, G.R. No. L-17633, 19 October 1966, 18 SCRA 371 • Baluyut v. Cruz-Pano, G.R. No. L-42088, 7 May 1976, 71 SCRA 86

2. Order of preference - Rule 78

• Gabriel v. CA, G.R. No. 101512, 7 August 1992, 212 SCRA 413 • Torres v. Sicat, 93 Phil. 155 (1953) • Silverio v. CA, G.R. No. 109979, 11 March 1999, 304 SCRA 541

3. Opposition to issuance of letters testamentary; simultaneous filing of petition for administration - Rule 79 ·

• Republic v. Marcos II , G.R. Nos. 130371 & 130855, 4 August 2009, 595 SCRA43

• Duran v. Duran, G.R. No. L-23372, 14 June 1967, 20 SCRA 379

4. Powers and duties of executors and administrators; restrictions on the powers- Rules 81, 83-85

• Ruiz v. CA, G.R. No. 118671, 29 January 1996, 252 SCRA 541 • Jocson de Hilado v. Nava, 68 Phil. 7 45 ( 1939) • Ledesma v. Enriquez, 84 Phi. 4783 (1949) • Leon v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co., G.R. No. L-3677, 29

November 1951, 90 SCRA 459 • Bolisay v. Alcid, G.R. No. L-45494, 31 August 1978, 85 SCRA 253 • Joson v. Joson, G.R. No. L-9686, 30 May 1961, 2 SCRA 82 • De Guzman v. De Guzman-Carillo, G.R. No. L-29276, 18 May 1978, 83

SCRA 256 • De Mendoza v. Pacheco, 64 Phil. 134 (1937)

5. Appointment of special administrator- Rule 80

• Ocampo v. Ocampo, G.R. No. 187879, 5 July 2010, 623 SCRA 559 • Tan v. Gedorio, Jr., G.R. No. 166520, 14 March 2008, 548 SCRA 528 • Pijuan v. Guerra, G.R. No. L-21917, 29 November 1966, 18 SCRA 898

4

·--··· ---- --------------- - ------------

6. Grounds for removal of administrator- Rule 80

• Gonzales v. Aguinaldo , G.R. No. 74769, 28 September 1990, 190 SCRA 112

F. Claims against the estate- Rule 86 & 88

1. Time within which claims shall be filed; exceptions 2. Statute of non-claims 3. Claim of executor or administrator against the estate 4. Payment of debts

• Santos v. Manarang , 27 Phil209 (1914) • Barredo v. CA, G.R. No. L-17863, 28 November 1962, 6 SCRA 620 • Pizarro v. Consolacion, G.R. No. 51278, 9 May 1988, 161 SCRA 186 • Aguas v. Llemos, G.R. No. L-18107, 30 August 1962, 5 SCRA 959 • Vera v. Fernandez, G.R. No. L-31364, 30 March 1979, 89 SCRA 199 • Jacob v. CA, G.R. No. 88602, 6 April1990, 184 SCRA 499 • Briones v. Henson-Cruz, G.R. No. 159130, 22 August 2008, 563 SCRA

69 • Romualdez v. Tiglao, G.R. No. 51151, 24 July 1981, 105 SCRA 762

G. Actions by and against executors and administrators- Rules 87 & 89

1. Actions that may be brought against executors and administrators 2. Requisites before creditor may bring an action for recovery of property

fraudulently conveyed by the deceased 3. Sales, mortgages and other encumbrances of property of decedent

• Rioferio v. CA, G.R. No. 129008, 13 January 2004, 419 SCRA 59

H. Distribution and partition- Rule 90

1. Liquidation 2. Project of partition 3. Remedy of an heir entitled to residue but not given his share 4. Instances when probate court may issue writ of execution

• Del Rosario v. CA, G.R. No. 29759, 18 May 1989, 173 SCRA 436 • Guilas v. CFI, G.R. No. L-26695, 31 January 1972, 43 SCRA 111 • Reyes v. Barretto-Datu, G.R. No. L-17818, 20 January 1967, 19 SCRA 85

Ill. ESCHEAT- Rule 91

A. When to file B. Requisites for filing of petition C. Remedy of respondent against petition; period for filing a claim

5

• Tan v. City of Davao, G.R. No. L-44347, 29 September 1988, 166 SCRA 73

• Republic v. CA, G.R. No. 143483, 31 January 2002 , 375 SCRA 484

IV. TRUSTEES- Rule 98

A. Distinguished from executor/administrator B. Conditions of the bond C. Requisites for the removal and resignation of a trustee D. Grounds for removal and resignation of a trustee E. Extent of authority of trustee

• De Leon v. Molo-Peckson, G.R. No. L-17809, 29 December 1962, 6 SCRA 978

• Saltiga de Romero v. CA, G.R. No. 109307, 25 November 1999, 319 SCRA 180

• Land Bank v. CA, G.R. No. 129368, 25 August 2003, 409 SCRA 455

V. ABSENTEES - Rule 1 07; Rule 73, Sec. 4; CIVIL CODE, Arts. 390 & 391 , FAMILY CODE, Art. 41

A. Purpose of the rule B. Who may file; when to file

• Republic v. Nolasco, G.R. No. 94053, 17 March 1993, 220 SCRA 20 • Toi-Noquera v. Villasor, G.R. No. 84250, 20 July 1992, 211 SCRA 616

PART THREE: RULES ON MARITAL RELATIONS

VI. DECLARATION OF ABSOLUTE NULLITY OF VOID MARRIAGES AND ANNULMENT OF VOIDABLE MARRIAGES- A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC dated 4 March 2003; A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC dated 4 March 2003; OCA Circular No. 96-03 dated 31 July 2003; Rule 9, Sec. 3(e); Rule 34, Sec. 1; Rule 108; FAMILY CODE, Arts. 35-54

VII. LEGAL SEPARATION- A.M. No. 02-11 -11-SC dated 4 March 2003; A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC dated 4 March 2003; OCA Circular No. 96-03 dated 31 July 2003; A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC dated 4 March 2003; A.M. No. 02-1:1-12-SC dated 4 March 2003; OCA Circular No. 96-03 dated 31 July 2003; Rule 9, Sec. 3(e); Rule 34, Sec. 1; Rule 108; FAMILY CODE, Arts. 55-67

PART FOUR: RULES ON FAMILY WELFARE

VIII. GUARDIANSHIP- Rules 92- 97; A.M. No. 03-02-05-SC dated 1 April 2003

A. General powers and duties of guardians B. Conditions of the bond of the guardian C. Rule on guardianship over minor

6

• Parco v. CA, G.R. No. L-33152, 30 January 1982, 111 SCRA 252 • Paciente v. Dacuycuy, G.R. No. L-58319, 29 June 1982, 114 SCRA 924 • Badillo v. Ferrer, G.R. No. 51369, 29 July 1987,1 52 SCRA 407 • Uy v. Jardeleza, G.R. No. 109557, 29 November 2000, 346 SCRA 246 • Goyena v. Ledesma-Gustilo, G.R. No. 147148, 13 January 2003, 395

SCRA 117

IX. ADOPTION- A.M. No. 02-6-02-SC dated 31 July 2002

A. Distinguish domestic adoption from inter-country adoption

B. Domestic Adoption Act- Rep. Act No. 8552 (1998); Rep. Act No. 9523 (2009)

1. Effects of adoption 2. Instances when adoption may be rescinded 3. Effects of rescission of adoption

• In The Matter of the Petition of the Minor Charles Joseph Blancaflor Weeks, G.R. No. L-21951, 27 November 1964, 12 SCRA400

• Republic v. Miller, G.R. No. 125932, 21 April1999, 306 SCRA 183 • Republic v. Toledano, G.R. No. 94147, 8 June 1994, 233 SCRA 9 • Landingin v. Republic, G.R. No. 164948, 27 June 2006,493 SCRA 415 • In Re: Petition for Adoption of Michelle P. Lim, G.R. Nos. 168992-93, 21

May 2009, 588 SCRA 98 • In the Matter of the Adoption of Stephanie Garcia , G.R. No. 148311, 31

March 2005, 454 SCRA 541 • Laham v. Sibulo, G.R. No. 143989, 14 July 2003, 406 SCRA 135 • Sayson v. CA, G.R. Nos. 89224-25, 23 January 1992, 205 SCRA 321

C. Inter-country adoption- Rep. Act No. 8043 (1995); Rep. Act No. 9523 (2009)

1. When allowed 2. Functions of the RTC 3. "Best interest of the minor" standard

X. CUSTODY OF MINORS · AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN RELATION TO CUSTODY OF MINORS- A.M. No. 03-04-04-SC dated 22 April2003

• Pablo-Gualberto v. Gualberto, G.R. No. 154994, 28 June 2005, 461 SCRA 450

XI. COMMITMENT OF CHILDREN- A.M. No. 02-1-19-SC dated 28 February 2002 Cf. HOSPITALIZATION OF INSANE PERSONS- Rule 101; REV. PEN. CODE, Art. 12, par. 1.

XII. JUDICIAL APPROVAL OF VOLUNTARY RECOGNITION OF MINOR NATURAL CHILDREN- Rule 105; FAMILY CODE, Arts . 163-165, 172-173, 175

• Gapusan-Chua v. CA, G.R. No. L-46746, 15 March 1990, 183 SCRA 160

7

XIII. CONSTITUTION OF FAMILY HOME- Rule 106 (deemed repealed) ; FAMILY CODE, Arts. 152-162

• Modequillo v. Salinas, G.R. No. 86355, 31 May 1990, 185 SCRA 766 • De Mesa v. Acero, G.R. No. 185064, 12 January 2012, 663 SCRA 40

PART FIVE: RULES ON PROTECTION OF LIFE, LIBERTY AND SECURITY

XIV. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS- CONST., Art. Ill, Sec. 15 & Art. VII , Sec. 18; Rule 102; A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC dated 25 September 2007; A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC dated 22 January 2008

A. Contents of the petition B. Contents of the return C. Distinguish peremptory writ from preliminary citation D. When not proper/applicable E. When writ disallowed/discharged F. Distinguish from writs of amparo and habeas data G. Rule on Custody of Minors and Writ of Habeas Corpus in relation to Custody of

Minors

• Moncupa v. Enrile, G.R. No. L-63345, 30 January 1986, 141 SCRA 233 • Velasco v. CA, G.R. No. 118644, 7 July 1995, 245 SCRA 677 • Cruz v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 137560, 19 January 2000, 322 SCRA

518 • So v. Tacla, G.R. Nos. 190108 & 190473, 19 October 2010, 633 SCRA

563 • llusorio v. Bildner, G.R. Nos. 139789 & 139780, 19 July 2001, 332 SCRA

169 • Chin Hui v. Rodriguez, G.R. No. 141938, 2 April2001 • Tijing v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 125901, 8 March 2001, 354 SCRA 17 • Thornton v. Thornton, G.R. No. 154598, 16 August 2004, 436 SCRA 550 • Salientes v. Abanilla, G.R. No. 162734, 29 August 2006, 500 SCRA 128 • Barreda v. Vinarao, G.R. No. 168728, 2 August 2007 , 529 SCRA 120 • Veluz v. Villanueva, G.R. No. 169482, 29 January 2008, 543 SCRA 63 • Fletcher v. Dir. of Bureau of Corrections, UDK-14071 , 17 July 2009, 593

SCRA 265

XV. WRIT OF AMPARO- A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC dated 25 September 2007; Rule 102; A.M . No. 08-1-16-SC dated 22 January 2008; Rule 126

A. Coverage B. Distinguish from habeas corpus and habeas data C. Differences between amparo and search warrant D. Who may file E. Contents of return F. Effects of failure to file return G. Omnibus waiver rule H. Procedure for hearing

8

I. Institution of separate action J. Effect of filing of a criminal action K. Consolidation L. Interim reliefs available to petitioner and respondent M. Quantum of proof in application for issuance of writ of amparo

• Canlas v. NAPICO Homeowners Association , G.R. No. 182795, 5 June 2008, 554 SCRA 205

• The Secretary of National Defense v. Manalo, G.R. No. 180906, 7 October 7, 2008, 568 SCRA 1 Burgos v. Macapagai-Arroyo, G.R. Nos. 183711-13,22June2010, 621 SCRA481

• Roxas v. Macapagai-Arroyo, G.R. No. 189155, 7 September 2010, 630 SCRA 211

• Lozada v. Macapagai-Arroyo, G.R. Nos. 184379-80, 24 April 2012, 670 SCRA 545

• De Lima v. Gatdula, G.R. No. 204528, 19 February 2013, 691 SCRA 226

XVI. WRIT OF HABEAS DATA- A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC dated 22 January 2008; Rule 102; A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC dated 25 September 2007

A. Scope of writ B. Availability of writ C. Distinguished from writs of habeas corpus and amparo D. Contents of the petition E. Contents of return F. Instances when petition may be heard in chambers G. Consolidation H. Effect of filing of a criminal action I. Institution of separate action J. Quantum of proof in application for issuance of writ of amparo

• Gamboa v. Chan, G.R. No. 193636, 24 July 2012, 677 SCRA 385 • Meralco v. Lim, G.R. No. 184769, 5 October 2010, 632 SCRA 195 • Tapuz v. Del Rosario, G. R. No. 182484, June 17, 2008, 554 SCRA 768

PART SIX: RULES ON CHANGE, CANCELLATION OR CORRECTION OF ENTRIES

XVII. CHANGE OF NAME- Rules 103 & 108; Rep. Act No. 9048 (2001) ; Rep. Act No. 9255 (2004)

A. Differences under Rule 103, Rep. Act No. 9048 and Rule 108

B. Grounds for change of name

• In Re: Petition for Correction of Entry in Certificate of Birth, Danilo Ibarra Sison and Josephine Ibarra Sison v. Republic, G .R. No. L-58087, 27 December 1982, 119 SCRA 439

• Republic v. CA, G.R. No. 103695, 15 March 1996, 255 SCRA 99

9

• Republic v. Belmonte, G.R. No. L-32600, 26 February 1988,158 SCRA 173

• Republic v. Marcos, G.R. No. L-31065, 15 February 1990,182 SCRA 223 • San Roque v. Republic, G.R. No. L-22035, 30 April 1968, 23 SCRA 444 • Republic v. Mercadera, G.R. No. 186027, 8 December 2010, 637 SCRA

654 • Huang Tin v. Republic, G.R. No. L-20997, 27 April 27 1967, 19 SCRA

966 • Republic v. Capote, G.R. No. 157043, 2 February 2007, 514 SCRA 76 • Republic v. Kho, G.R. No. 170340, 29 June 2007, 526 SCRA 177 (2007) • Silverio v. Republic, G.R. No. 174689, 22 October 2007, 537 SCRA 373 • Republic v. Cagandahan, G.R. N. 166676, 16 September 2008, 565

SCRA 72

XVIII. CANCELLATION OR CORRECTION OF ENTRIES IN THE CIVIL REGISTRY- Rule 108; CiVIL CODE, Arts. 376 and 412, Pres. Decree No. 651 (1975); Rep. Act No. 9048 (2001); Rep. Act No. 9255 (2004), Comm. Act. No. 142 (1936), as amended

A. Entries subject to cancellation or correction under Rule 108, in relation to Rep. Act No. 9048 (2001)

• Corpuz v. Sto. Tomas, G.R. No. 186571, 11 August 2010, 628 SCRA 266 • Lim v. Zosa, G.R. No. L-40252, 29 December 1986, 146 SCRA 366 • Republic v. Bautista, G.R. No. L-35316, 26 October 1987, 155 SCRA 1 • Leonor v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 112597, 2 April1996, 256 SCRA 69 • Babiera v. Catotal, G.R. No. 138493, 15 June 2000, 333 SCRA 487 • Republic v. Coseteng-Magpayo, G.R. No. 189476, 2 February 2011, 641

SCRA 533 • Alba v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 164041, 29 July 2005, 465 SCRA 495 • Braza v. City Civil Registrar of Himamaylan City, Negros Occ., G.R. No.

181174,4 December 2009, 607 SCRA 638

PART SEVEN: INSOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL REHABILITATION OF NATURAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS AND VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION

OF CORPORATIONS

XIX. FINANCIAL REHABILITATION- Rep. Act No. 10142 (2010); A.M. No. 12-12-11-SC dated 27 August 2013 (Financial Rehabilitation Rules of Procedure)

• Panlilio v. RTC, Branch 51 of Manila, G.R. No. 173846, 2 February 2011, 641 SCRA 438

• Yngson v. PNB, G.R. No. 171132, 15 August 2012, 678 SCRA 497 • China Banking Corp. v. Cebu Printing and Packaging Corp., G.R. No.

172880, 11 August 2010, 628 SCRA 154

XX. VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION OF CORPORATIONS- Rule 104 (deemed repealed); CORP. CODE, Sees. 117-122

10

• Vesagas v. CA, G.R. No. 142924, 5 December 2001, 371 SCRA 508

PART EIGHT: PROCEEDINGS IN RELATION TO ADR

XXI. SPECIAL ADR RULES- A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC dated 1 September 2009; Rep. Act No. 876 (1953); Rep. Act No. 9285 (2004)

PART NINE: APPEALS

XXII. APPEALS IN SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS - Rule 109; A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC dated 25 September 2007, Rule 19; A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC dated 22 January 2008, Rule 19; A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC dated 4 March 2003, Sec. 20; A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC dated 4 March 2003, Sec. 17

A. Judgments and orders for which appeal may be taken B. When to appeal C. Modes of appeal D. Rule on advance distribution

• Republic v. Nishina, G.R. No. 186053, 15 November 2010, 634 SCRA 716

• Lebin v. Mirasol, G.R. No. 164255, 7 September 2011, 657 SCRA 35 • Republic v. CA, G.R. No. 163604, 6 May 2005,458 SCRA 200 • Banez v. Banez, G.R. No. 132592, 23 2002, 374 SCRA 340 • BPI v. Pryce Gases, G.R. No. 188365, 29 June 2011, 653 SCRA 42 • Ruiz v. CA, G.R. No. 118671, 29 January 1996, 252 SCRA 541

11