Social ratings as the new currency of marketeers? - Presentation GOR 2015
-
Upload
christian-bosau -
Category
Marketing
-
view
67 -
download
0
Transcript of Social ratings as the new currency of marketeers? - Presentation GOR 2015
Social ratings as the new currency of marketeers?
– A comparison of influences from Likes
and test seals on product ratings –
C. Bosau, L. Pöppel & U. Rieger
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
Practical background: § Online purchases are steadily increasing § However, the purchase experience in online settings is different to
offline settings
Purpose of the study
2
§ Rating information becomes more important since personal testing is not possible
Theoretical background: § Customers like to buy “socially proofed“ products
Ø In new, unclear and ambigous (buying) situations people like to follow others due to informational as well as normative social influence (Stürmer & Siem, 2013; Mente & Sieg, 2013)
§ Several market research studies show the high influence of social media on online purchases (e.g. Schengber, 2011).
§ Online ratings (e.g. stars) seem to have an influence on purchase decisions (Chevalier & Mayzlin, 2006).
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
Research questions
§ Are customers influenced by ratings of social media, i.e. “Likes”?
§ Is this influence higher than the influence of test seals like “Stiftung Warentest“?
§ Is there a difference between Convenience- und Shopping-Goods?
Study goals
3
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
Study-Design
IV1 Seal „Stiftung
Warentest“ (objective
rating)
IV2 Social rating (subjective
rating)
DV product rating
Moderator product type
(Convenience- vs. Shopping-
Goods)
4
Moderator § FB-Account § product need
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
Operationalisation
5
IV1 Seal „Stiftung
Warentest“ (objective rating)
Test seal of „Stiftung Warentest“ with: • „sehr gut“ • „ausreichend“
IV2 Social rating
(subjective rating)
Number of likes: • low (5-10 Likes) • medium (ca. 500 Likes) • high (ca. 5000 Likes)
DV product rating
Scale of 3 items (α = .841 -‐ α = .919 depending on product) • Quality rating: „Dieses Produkt besitzt eine gute Qualität“
• Purchasing intention: „Ich könnte mir gut vorstellen, dieses Produkt zu kaufen“
• Customer recommendation: „Ich würde dieses Produkt meinen Bekannten weiterempfehlen“
Moderator product type
(Convenience- vs. Shopping-Goods)
Two products for each category: • SG: Laptop, TV • CG: water, cholocate
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
Experimental design
S#$ung Warentest (IV 1)
nega&ve posi&ve
Number of Likes
(IV 2) Low N = 176 N = 204
Medium N = 196 N = 207 High N = 180 N = 207
6
Repeated measurement: § 4 different products (within the same category of the experimental design)
Method: • online questionnaire in 2014 • N = 1170, drawn via a panel-database by MW Research • age: mean = 48,1y, SD = 23,8y • male = 47,7%, female = 52,3% • representative for German population (regarding age, gender, country)
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
ü Small/medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=45.43, p < .00, η2 = .04
- NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.97, p = .38, η2 = .002
- NO interaction: F(2)=.24, p = .79, η2 = .000
Results: Total sample
9
3,38 3,38 3,26
2,97 2,92 2,89
2,6
2,8
3
3,2
3,4
3,6
FB-‐Likes low
FB-‐Likes medium
FB-‐Likes high
SW posi&ve SW nega&ve
Product rating TV:
3,21
3,39 3,25
2,72 2,69 2,65
2,4
2,6
2,8
3
3,2
3,4
3,6
FB-‐Likes low
FB-‐Likes medium
FB-‐Likes high
SW posi&ve SW nega&ve
ü medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=87.49, p < .00, η2 = .07
- NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.77, p = .46, η2 = .001
- NO interaction: F(2)=.81, p = .45, η2 = .001
Product rating Laptop:
Also controlled for: age, gender, income & rela&onship status
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
ü Small/medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=65.19, p < .00, η2 = .05
- NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.96, p = .38, η2 = .002
ü Small marginal interaction: F(2)=2.37, p <.10, η2 = .004
Results: Total sample
10
2,86 2,94 2,9
2,45
2,15
2,37
2
2,2
2,4
2,6
2,8
3
FB-‐Likes low
FB-‐Likes medium
FB-‐Likes high
SW posi&ve SW nega&ve
Product rating water:
2,8
2,96 2,91
2,51
2,24 2,27
2
2,2
2,4
2,6
2,8
3
3,2
FB-‐Likes low
FB-‐Likes medium
FB-‐Likes high
SW posi&ve SW nega&ve
ü Small/medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=63.71, p < .00, η2 = .05
- NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.34, p = .71, η2 = .001
ü Small interaction: F(2)=3.56, p < .05, η2 = .006
Product rating chocolate:
Controlled for: age, gender, income & rela&onship status
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
Conclusion: Total sample
11
Ø The test seal of „Stiftung Warentest“ does have a clear positive effect on the product rating
Ø Likes have no effect on the product rating at all
Ø There is no difference between shopping and convenience goods
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
Results: only people with product need
ü Medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=24.28, p < .00, η2 = .07
- NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=1.98, p = .14, η2 = .012
ü Small interaction: F(2)=3.36, p < .05, η2 = .020
12
3,55 3,64 3,61
3,4
2,81 2,88
2,6
2,8
3
3,2
3,4
3,6
3,8
FB-‐Likes low
FB-‐Likes medium
FB-‐Likes high
SW posi&ve SW nega&ve
Product rating TV:
3,28
3,57 3,63
2,99
2,77 2,73 2,6
2,8
3
3,2
3,4
3,6
3,8
FB-‐Likes low
FB-‐Likes medium
FB-‐Likes high
SW posi&ve SW nega&ve
ü Medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=29.13, p < .00, η2 = .08
- NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.04, p = .96, η2 = .000
ü Small interaction: F(2)=2.42, p < .10, η2 = .014
Product rating Laptop:
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
13
Ø The test seal of „Stiftung Warentest“ does have a clear positive effect on the product rating
Ø For people with a definite product need, the effect of Likes depends on the test seal rating
v More Likes combined with a negative test rating do have a counterproductive effect à the product rating of shopping goods gets even worse
Conclusion: only people with product need
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
ü Small interaction: F(2)=3.27, p < .05, η2 = .012
- NO effect of Likes - NO effect of FB-Account
Results: Comparison FB-account (total sample) - only for negative test seal „Stiftung Warentest“ -
14
3,15
2,94
2,84
2,68
2,89
2,97
2,6
2,8
3
3,2
FB-‐Likes low
FB-‐Likes medium
FB-‐Likes high
FB-‐Account yes FB-‐Account no
Product rating TV:
2,83 2,77
2,63
2,52
2,6
2,68
2,4
2,6
2,8
3
FB-‐Likes low
FB-‐Likes medium
FB-‐Likes high
FB-‐Account yes FB-‐Account no
Product rating laptop:
ü Tendency of interaction, NO sign. effect: F(2)=1.11, p = .33, η2 = .004
- NO effect of Likes - NO effect of FB-Account
Likes do buffer the effect of a negative test seal a bit, but only for non-Facebook-User. For Facebook-Users, more Likes make it even worse.
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
Conclusion: comparison FB-account
15
Ø Likes do buffer the effect of a negative test seal a bit, but only for non-Facebook-User.
Ø For Facebook-Users, more Likes make it even worse.
Ø By the way: NO interaction effects for a positive test seal à a positive rating of „Stiftung Warentest“ works, regardless of Likes and FB-membership NO effects for convenience goods (water, chocolate)
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
§ The rating of “Stiftung Warentest” does generally have a significant effect
Conclusion: Effect of “Stiftung Warentest”
16
§ A positive rating leads to a better product rating and a higher purchasing intention
§ A negative rating leads to a noticeable lower product rating and a smaller purchasing intention
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
§ The effect of Likes depends on a facebook membership, i.e. whether customers can maybe understand the meaning of Likes
§ However: This effect can only be found, if …
u the product has a negative objective rating and
u the product is a shopping-good
Conclusion: Effect of Likes - 1
17
§ For Facebook-Non-Users Likes buffer the negative, objective rating.
§ For Facebook-Users having many Likes is incomprehensible and probably creates dissonance.
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
§ Additionally, an effect of Likes can better be found for people with an actual product need:
u Only if people plan to buy a specific product a clear effect of Likes can be found
18
§ Likes could – maybe – have a positive impact – for shopping goods –, if there is an objective positive rating too
§ Likes have a more negative impact – for shopping goods –, if they are combined with an objective negative rating
Conclusion: Effect of Likes - 2
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
19
• Chevalier, J. A. & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 3(43), pp. 345 - 354.
• Mente, T. & Sieg, M. (2013). Kundennutzen: die Basis für den Verkauf - So verwandeln Sie Leistungen in messbaren Mehrwert. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler .
• Schengber, R. (2011). Social Media Einfluss auf das Kaufverhalten im Internet - Eine Studie. Münster: DASF GmbH. • Stürmer, S. & Siem, B. (2013). Sozialpsychologie der Gruppe. München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.
Literature
GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?
20
Thank you very much for your attention!
Contact details:
Rheinische Fachhochschule Köln Prof. Dr. Christian Bosau, Dipl.-Psych. & Master of HRM & IR Schaevenstraße 1a/b 50676 Köln Tel.: +49 221 20302-0 e-mail: [email protected] Slideshare: cbosau Twitter: cribocologne