Social ratings as the new currency of marketeers? - Presentation GOR 2015

20
Social ratings as the new currency of marketeers? – A comparison of influences from Likes and test seals on product ratings – C. Bosau, L. Pöppel & U. Rieger

Transcript of Social ratings as the new currency of marketeers? - Presentation GOR 2015

Social ratings as the new currency of marketeers?

– A comparison of influences from Likes

and test seals on product ratings –

C. Bosau, L. Pöppel & U. Rieger

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Practical background: §  Online purchases are steadily increasing §  However, the purchase experience in online settings is different to

offline settings

Purpose of the study

2

§  Rating information becomes more important since personal testing is not possible

Theoretical background: §  Customers like to buy “socially proofed“ products

Ø  In new, unclear and ambigous (buying) situations people like to follow others due to informational as well as normative social influence (Stürmer & Siem, 2013; Mente & Sieg, 2013)

§  Several market research studies show the high influence of social media on online purchases (e.g. Schengber, 2011).

§  Online ratings (e.g. stars) seem to have an influence on purchase decisions (Chevalier & Mayzlin, 2006).

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Research questions

§  Are customers influenced by ratings of social media, i.e. “Likes”?

§  Is this influence higher than the influence of test seals like “Stiftung Warentest“?

§  Is there a difference between Convenience- und Shopping-Goods?

Study goals

3

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Study-Design

IV1 Seal „Stiftung

Warentest“ (objective

rating)

IV2 Social rating (subjective

rating)

DV product rating

Moderator product type

(Convenience- vs. Shopping-

Goods)

4

Moderator §  FB-Account §  product need

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Operationalisation

5

IV1 Seal „Stiftung

Warentest“ (objective rating)

Test seal of „Stiftung Warentest“ with: •  „sehr gut“ •  „ausreichend“

IV2 Social rating

(subjective rating)

Number of likes: •  low (5-10 Likes) •  medium (ca. 500 Likes) •  high (ca. 5000 Likes)

DV product rating

Scale of 3 items (α  =  .841  -­‐  α  =  .919  depending  on  product) •  Quality rating: „Dieses Produkt besitzt eine gute Qualität“

•  Purchasing intention: „Ich könnte mir gut vorstellen, dieses Produkt zu kaufen“

•  Customer recommendation: „Ich würde dieses Produkt meinen Bekannten weiterempfehlen“

Moderator product type

(Convenience- vs. Shopping-Goods)

Two products for each category: •  SG: Laptop, TV •  CG: water, cholocate

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Experimental design

  S#$ung  Warentest  (IV  1)

    nega&ve posi&ve

Number  of  Likes    

(IV  2) Low N = 176 N = 204

Medium N = 196 N = 207 High N = 180 N = 207

6

Repeated measurement: §  4 different products (within the same category of the experimental design)

Method: •  online questionnaire in 2014 •  N = 1170, drawn via a panel-database by MW Research •  age: mean = 48,1y, SD = 23,8y •  male = 47,7%, female = 52,3% •  representative for German population (regarding age, gender, country)

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Stimulus material

7

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Stimulus material

8

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

ü  Small/medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=45.43, p < .00, η2 = .04

-  NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.97, p = .38, η2 = .002

-  NO interaction: F(2)=.24, p = .79, η2 = .000

Results: Total sample

9

3,38   3,38  3,26  

2,97  2,92   2,89  

2,6  

2,8  

3  

3,2  

3,4  

3,6  

FB-­‐Likes  low  

FB-­‐Likes  medium  

FB-­‐Likes  high  

SW  posi&ve   SW  nega&ve  

Product rating TV:

3,21  

3,39  3,25  

2,72   2,69   2,65  

2,4  

2,6  

2,8  

3  

3,2  

3,4  

3,6  

FB-­‐Likes  low  

FB-­‐Likes  medium  

FB-­‐Likes  high  

SW  posi&ve   SW  nega&ve  

ü  medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=87.49, p < .00, η2 = .07

-  NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.77, p = .46, η2 = .001

-  NO interaction: F(2)=.81, p = .45, η2 = .001

Product rating Laptop:

Also  controlled  for:    age,  gender,  income  &  rela&onship  status  

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

ü  Small/medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=65.19, p < .00, η2 = .05

-  NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.96, p = .38, η2 = .002

ü  Small marginal interaction: F(2)=2.37, p <.10, η2 = .004

Results: Total sample

10

2,86  2,94   2,9  

2,45  

2,15  

2,37  

2  

2,2  

2,4  

2,6  

2,8  

3  

FB-­‐Likes  low  

FB-­‐Likes  medium  

FB-­‐Likes  high  

SW  posi&ve   SW  nega&ve  

Product rating water:

2,8  

2,96   2,91  

2,51  

2,24   2,27  

2  

2,2  

2,4  

2,6  

2,8  

3  

3,2  

FB-­‐Likes  low  

FB-­‐Likes  medium  

FB-­‐Likes  high  

SW  posi&ve   SW  nega&ve  

ü  Small/medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=63.71, p < .00, η2 = .05

-  NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.34, p = .71, η2 = .001

ü  Small interaction: F(2)=3.56, p < .05, η2 = .006

Product rating chocolate:

Controlled  for:    age,  gender,  income  &  rela&onship  status  

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Conclusion: Total sample

11

Ø  The test seal of „Stiftung Warentest“ does have a clear positive effect on the product rating

Ø  Likes have no effect on the product rating at all

Ø  There is no difference between shopping and convenience goods

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Results: only people with product need

ü  Medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=24.28, p < .00, η2 = .07

-  NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=1.98, p = .14, η2 = .012

ü  Small interaction: F(2)=3.36, p < .05, η2 = .020

12

3,55  3,64   3,61  

3,4  

2,81  2,88  

2,6  

2,8  

3  

3,2  

3,4  

3,6  

3,8  

FB-­‐Likes  low  

FB-­‐Likes  medium  

FB-­‐Likes  high  

SW  posi&ve   SW  nega&ve  

Product rating TV:

3,28  

3,57   3,63  

2,99  

2,77   2,73  2,6  

2,8  

3  

3,2  

3,4  

3,6  

3,8  

FB-­‐Likes  low  

FB-­‐Likes  medium  

FB-­‐Likes  high  

SW  posi&ve   SW  nega&ve  

ü  Medium effect of „Stiftung Warentest“: F(1)=29.13, p < .00, η2 = .08

-  NO effect of von FB-Likes: F(2)=.04, p = .96, η2 = .000

ü  Small interaction: F(2)=2.42, p < .10, η2 = .014

Product rating Laptop:

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

13

Ø  The test seal of „Stiftung Warentest“ does have a clear positive effect on the product rating

Ø  For people with a definite product need, the effect of Likes depends on the test seal rating

v  More Likes combined with a negative test rating do have a counterproductive effect à the product rating of shopping goods gets even worse

Conclusion: only people with product need

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

ü  Small interaction: F(2)=3.27, p < .05, η2 = .012

-  NO effect of Likes -  NO effect of FB-Account

Results: Comparison FB-account (total sample) - only for negative test seal „Stiftung Warentest“ -

14

3,15  

2,94  

2,84  

2,68  

2,89  

2,97  

2,6  

2,8  

3  

3,2  

FB-­‐Likes  low  

FB-­‐Likes  medium  

FB-­‐Likes  high  

FB-­‐Account  yes   FB-­‐Account  no  

Product rating TV:

2,83  2,77  

2,63  

2,52  

2,6  

2,68  

2,4  

2,6  

2,8  

3  

FB-­‐Likes  low  

FB-­‐Likes  medium  

FB-­‐Likes  high  

FB-­‐Account  yes   FB-­‐Account  no  

Product rating laptop:

ü  Tendency of interaction, NO sign. effect: F(2)=1.11, p = .33, η2 = .004

-  NO effect of Likes -  NO effect of FB-Account

Likes do buffer the effect of a negative test seal a bit, but only for non-Facebook-User. For Facebook-Users, more Likes make it even worse.

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

Conclusion: comparison FB-account

15

Ø  Likes do buffer the effect of a negative test seal a bit, but only for non-Facebook-User.

Ø  For Facebook-Users, more Likes make it even worse.

Ø  By the way: NO interaction effects for a positive test seal à a positive rating of „Stiftung Warentest“ works, regardless of Likes and FB-membership NO effects for convenience goods (water, chocolate)

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

§  The rating of “Stiftung Warentest” does generally have a significant effect

Conclusion: Effect of “Stiftung Warentest”

16

§  A positive rating leads to a better product rating and a higher purchasing intention

§  A negative rating leads to a noticeable lower product rating and a smaller purchasing intention

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

§  The effect of Likes depends on a facebook membership, i.e. whether customers can maybe understand the meaning of Likes

§  However: This effect can only be found, if …

u  the product has a negative objective rating and

u  the product is a shopping-good

Conclusion: Effect of Likes - 1

17

§  For Facebook-Non-Users Likes buffer the negative, objective rating.

§  For Facebook-Users having many Likes is incomprehensible and probably creates dissonance.

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

§  Additionally, an effect of Likes can better be found for people with an actual product need:

u  Only if people plan to buy a specific product a clear effect of Likes can be found

18

§  Likes could – maybe – have a positive impact – for shopping goods –, if there is an objective positive rating too

§  Likes have a more negative impact – for shopping goods –, if they are combined with an objective negative rating

Conclusion: Effect of Likes - 2

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

19

•  Chevalier, J. A. & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 3(43), pp. 345 - 354.

•  Mente, T. & Sieg, M. (2013). Kundennutzen: die Basis für den Verkauf - So verwandeln Sie Leistungen in messbaren Mehrwert. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler .

•  Schengber, R. (2011). Social Media Einfluss auf das Kaufverhalten im Internet - Eine Studie. Münster: DASF GmbH. •  Stürmer, S. & Siem, B. (2013). Sozialpsychologie der Gruppe. München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.

Literature

GOR 2015 Bosau, Pöppel & Rieger: social ratings = new currency?

20

Thank you very much for your attention!

Contact details:

Rheinische Fachhochschule Köln Prof. Dr. Christian Bosau, Dipl.-Psych. & Master of HRM & IR Schaevenstraße 1a/b 50676 Köln Tel.: +49 221 20302-0 e-mail: [email protected] Slideshare: cbosau Twitter: cribocologne