Social media for sustainable engineering communication

12
Social media for sustainable engineering communication Dr. Brad Mehlenbacher Leadership, Policy & Adult & Higher Education NC State University [email protected] du www4.ncsu.edu/~brad _m Sarah McKone, Christine Grant, Tuere Bowles, Steve Peretti, Pamela Martin. Co-authors :

description

From Mehlenbacher, B., McKone, S., Grant, C., Bowles, T., Peretti, S. & Martin, P. (2010). Social media for sustainable engineering communication. SIGDOC’10: The 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication Proceedings. São Carlos-São Paulo, Brazil: ACM, 65-72.This paper provides an overview of current research on social media applications, including user demographics and how social media websites define themselves. The paper also describes user activities using social media and suggests known strengths and weaknesses of social media, and concludes by outlining several recommendations for developing strong online communities.

Transcript of Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Page 1: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Dr. Brad MehlenbacherLeadership, Policy &Adult & Higher EducationNC State [email protected] www4.ncsu.edu/~brad_m

ACM SIGDOC ‘10, Brazil

Sarah McKone, Christine Grant, Tuere Bowles, Steve Peretti, Pamela Martin.

Co-authors :

Page 2: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Outline of social media presentation

Identifying the history of social media Captivating an audience Capturing the functional complexity Emphasizing strengths and weaknesses of social

media Unpacking the privacy challenge Reiterating the call for social media research Building a database of social media applications Re-viewing the social media instructionally Inventing social media literacies

http://www.slideshare.net/ (see also http://www4.ncsu.edu/~brad_m/socialinstruction.html)

Download from:

Page 3: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

SM has a very brief history

Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of social networking applications created since 1997

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), 210-230. Available online: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html

Adopted from:

Page 4: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Social Media are complex …

By 2008, 48% of 3054 Internet adults have visited video-sharing applications (double last year)

75% of online adults 18-24 have a social network profile; 57% adults 25-34 have a profile; 30% adults 35-44 have a profile

SM are difficult to categorize, to compare, and to describe in terms of their functional goals

Lenhart, A. (2009). Adults and social network websites. Project Data Memo of the PEW Internet and American Life Project. Available online: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Adult_social_networking_data_memo_FINAL.pdf.pdf Rainie, L. (2008). Video sharing websites. Project Data Memo of the PEW Internet and American Life Project. Available online: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2008/Pew_Videosharing_memo_Jan08.pdf.pdf

Adopted from:

Page 5: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

… conceptually

ethority’s comprehensive social media graphic at http://www.ethority.de/weblog/social-media-prisma/(see also http://www.go2web20.net)

Adopted from:

Page 6: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Social Media and Web 2.0

Many people—including, or perhaps especially, supporters—critique the “Web 2.0 moniker for definitional reasons. Few can agree on even the general outlines of Web 2.0. It is about no single new development. Moreover, the term is often applied to a a heterogeneous mix of relatively familiar and also very emergent technologies. The former may appear as very much “Web 1.0,” and the latter may be seen as too evanescent to be relied on for serious informatic work (p. 33).

Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, March/April.

Adopted from:

Page 7: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Strengths and weaknesses of Social Media

Aggregation, openness, personal, productive, shared responsibility, pleasurable, identity formation, engagment, rich site summary, critical interaction

Page 8: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Social media openness, one issue

Search for “facebook privacy” in the nytimes.com

Adopted from:

Page 9: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Social Media calls for research

We need to define and trace their history We need to understand design for “profiling,

blogging, wiki-ing, and friending” and tweeting We need to study ethical, support and policy

issues related to SM We need to better understand how to teach,

research, and build theory within these spaces.

Simonson, M. (2007). Social networking for distance education: Where is the research? Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9 (2), vii.

Adopted from:

Page 10: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

How Social Media defines itself

Wikipedia’s growing list of social media networks and applications at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites

Adopted from:

SM describes itself (Wordle representation of most common words within site descriptions of world’s top 50 social networks

Page 11: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

Elements of educational Social Media

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2-3), 87-105.Howard, T. W. (2010). Design to Thrive: Creating Social Networks and Online Communities that Last. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Adopted from:

Lurking to contributing to creating to leading

Renumeration (investment), influence (contribution), belonging (identification), significance (community)

Page 12: Social media for sustainable engineering communication

New Social Media literacies

Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G. (2002) Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (4) 169–189. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Clinton, K., Weigel, M., & Robinson, A. J. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. An Occasional paper for digital media and learning. MacArthur Foundation. Available online: http://digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/{7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9C-E807E1B0AE4E}/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF

Adopted from:

Building collaborative identify work and supporting productive multilogues