So Sánh Các Loại Nghiên Cứu
Transcript of So Sánh Các Loại Nghiên Cứu
Quantitative Studies: Descriptive/Survey, Causal-Comparative, Correlational, Experimental
Descriptive/Survey Causal-Comparative Correlational Experiment
Purpose To describe current conditions To explore relationships among
variables that cannot be actively
manipulated or controlled by the
researcher
To ascertain the extent to which two
or more variables are statistically
related
To establish cause and effect
relationships between variables
Examples What are the attitudes of parents,
students, and teachers to an extended
school year?
To what extent are elementary
teachers using math manipulatives?
What is the effect of part-time
employment on the achievement of
high school students?
What characteristics differentiate
students who dropout from those who
do not?
What are the effects of smoking on
health?
What is the relationship between ACT
scores and freshmen grades?
Do significant relationships exist
between the types of activities used in
math classrooms and student
achievement?
Examine the effect of teaching with a
1) co-operative groups strategy or 2)
traditional lecture approach on
student’s achievement
Examine the effect of teaching with
manipulatives or a traditional
algorithm approach on the test scores
of algebra students
Characteristics Use of large samples
Use of tests, questionnaires, and
surveys
Focused on information related to
preferences, attitudes, practices,
concerns, or interests
Statistical analysis of numerical data
Selection of subjects from at least two
groups in which the cause (i.e., the
independent variable) has already
occurred
Statistical comparisons of the effect
(i.e., the dependent variable) using at
least two groups
Measurement with a correlation
coefficient
One group of subjects measured on
two variables
Use of instruments to measure
variables
Focused on the direction and nature of
the relationship
Stringent procedures for selecting
subjects and assigning them to groups
Manipulation of the causal variable
Control of extraneous variables
Statistical analysis of numerical data
Potential
Problems
Instrument development
Low response rates
Honest responses from subjects
Inferring cause and effect
relationships
Instrument development
Inferring cause and effect
relationships
Inability of researcher to adequately
control extraneous variables
Use of complicated research designs
Complex statistical analyses of data
Qualitative Studies: Biography, Phenomenology, Grounded Theory, Ethnography, Case Study, (Hybrid of these)
Type of Study
(keyword)
Biography/Historical
(one person/(event)
Phenomenology
(Meaning)
Grounded Theory
(Theory/Model)
Ethnography
(Culture/Group)
Case Study
(Big Picture/System)
Purpose To explore the life of one
individual.
To gain insight into past events,
issues, of personalities to better
understand the current situation
To understand what an
experience or phenomenon or
behavior means to a sample
of people and how they
construct those meanings.
To develop a theory or
theoretical model where none
exists in the literature relative
to the sample.
To describe and interpret a
cultural or social group of
people to another culture or
group.
To develop and in-depth
analysis of a single case
(organization, family, event,
etc.) or multiple cases,
wherein all of the possible
internal and external
relationships are considered.
Examples A study of Abraham Lincoln’s
life.
Current parochial school
policies can be better
understood with knowledge of
the role these schools have
played in the education of
students in the community for
the last fifty years
A description of the “caring
interaction” between a nurse
and his or her patient (i.e.,
What is essential for the
experience to be described by
the client as being a caring
interaction?)
What theories underlie the
school change efforts of
teachers in a parochial
elementary school?
What underlying theory
explains teacher’s changing
from traditional assessment
beliefs and practices to
alternative, performance-
based assessment beliefs and
practices?
What is the nature of the
problems a teacher
encounters when he begins
using a constructivist
approach to instruction after
having taught for ten years
using a very traditional
approach?
Campus reaction to a gunman
incident in which a student
attempted to fire a gun at his
classmates.
Characteristics Focus on specific individuals,
social issues, events, or policies
Documents and artifacts are the
primary sources of data, but
interviews and observations can
also be used
Data is already available and is
complied, presented, and
interpreted
Data is examined carefully for
authenticity and truthfulness
Describes the lived
experiences for several
individuals about a concept or
phenomenon.
Search for meaning of an
experience.
Long, open-ended interviews
with up to 10 people who
shared the experience
(questionnaires are ok if you
must)
Ask three things:
1. What happened?
2. What does it mean?
3. How did you come to
that conclusion?
Respect for participant’s
beliefs and views
Qualitative data collection
using analytic strategies
In-depth, structured
(saturation) interviews are
built around categories that
define the issue and
conducted with 20-30 people
(questionnaires ok if you
must)
Inductively reasoned
synthesis of data through the
use of constant comparison
analysis
Conceptual nature of the
process
The study is conducted in the
natural setting for a lengthy
period of time
Emerging research design
Participants are observed in
naturally occurring activities
Researchers develops trust
with participants
Cyclical nature of data
collection and analysis
Observation and interviews
are the dominate data
collection strategies
Inductive nature of the data
analysis
The case is studied within its
setting and described this way
Gain confidence and trust of
participants
Data collection is extensive
and collected from multiple
sources—documents, archival
records, interviews,
observations, physical
artifacts, questionnaires
Data are themed, tell a story
Potential
Problems
Authenticity
Truthfulness
Reliance on secondary sources
Values of researcher can affect
interpretation
Participants selection—need
to have experienced the
phenomenon
May be hard to
interpret/analyze/
summarize/classify the
“essence” of the experience.
Researcher bias
Poor data collection strategies
Difficulty analyzing data
Insufficient time spent in the
field
Poor data collection efforts or
insufficient data collected
Poor data analysis
Researcher bias
Insufficient time spent in the
field
Poor data collection efforts or
insufficient data collected
Poor data analysis
Researcher bias