Sligo Baptist Church Special Exception Application Part 2

8/11/2019 Sligo Baptist Church Special Exception Application Part 2

1/14

Exhibit J: Federal Airways

Airspace Summary Report: New

Construction Antenna Structure


2/14

****************************************************

*

Federal Ai rways Ai r space

*

Summar y Repor t : New Const r uct i on

*

Ant enna St r uctur e

****************************************************

Ai r space User : Not I dent i f i ed

Fi l e: DENNI SAVE

Locat i on: Kens i ngt on, MD

Di st ance: 1. 9 St at ut e M l es

Di rect i on: 270 ( t rue bear i ng)

Lat i t ude: 39- 01 - 32. 16 Longi t ude: 77-

02 - 13. 39

SI TE ELEVATI ON AMSL 330 f t .

STRUCTURE HEI GHT 101 f t .

OVERALL HEI GHT AMSL 431 f t .

NOTI CE CRI TERI A

FAR 77. 9{a}: NNR ( DNE 200 f t AGL}

FAR 77. 9( b}: NNR

( DNE Not i ce Sl ope}

FAR 77. 9( c}: NNR

( Not a Tr aver se Way)

FAR 77. 9:

NNR FAR 77. 9 I FR St r ai ght - I n Not i ce Cr i t er i a f or

CGS

FAR 77. 9:

NNR FAR 77. 9 I FR St r ai ght - I n Not i ce Cr i t er i a f or

W18

FAR 77. 9{d) : NNR (Of f Ai rpor t Const ruct i on}

NR = Not i ce Requi r ed

NNR

=

Not i ce Not Requi red

PNR

=

Possi bl e Not i ce Requi red ( depends upon act ual I FR

procedure}

For new const r uct i on r evi ew Ai r Navi gat i on Faci l i t i es at

bot t om

of t hi s r epor t .

Not i ce t o t he FAA i s not r equi r ed at t he anal yzed l ocat i on and

hei ght f or

sl ope, hei ght or St r ai ght - I n pr ocedur es. Pl ease r evi ew the Ai r

Navi gat i on

sect i on f or not i ce r equi r ement s f or of f set I FR procedures and

EMI.


3/14

OBSTRUCTI ON STANDARDS

FAR 77. 17( a) ( 1}: DNE 499 f t AGL

FAR 77. 17( a} ( 2) : DNE - Ai r por t Sur f ace

FAR 77. 19( a) : DNE - Hor i zont al Sur f ace

FAR 77. 19( b) : DNE - Coni cal Sur f ace

FAR 77. 19( c}: DNE - Pr i mar y Sur f ace

FAR 77. 19( d}: DNE - Appr oach Sur f ace

FAR 77. 19( e) : DNE - Tr ansi t i onal Sur f ace

VFR TRAFFI C PATTERN AI RSPACE FOR:

CGS: COLLEGE PARK

Type: A RD:

35294. 86 RE: 48. 4

FAR 77. 17(a) ( l ) :

DNE

FAR 77. 17{a) ( 2) : Does Not Appl y;

VFR Hor i zont al Sur f ace: DNE

VFR Coni cal Sur f ace: DNE

VFR Appr oach Sl ope: DNE

VFR Tr ansi t i onal Sl ope: DNE

VFR TRAFFI C PATTERN AI RSPACE FOR: W8: SUBURBAN

Type: A RD: 61503. 51 RE: 126. 6

FAR 77. 17( a) ( 1) : DNE

FAR 77. 17{a) ( 2) : Does Not Appl y.

VFR Hor i zont al Sur f ace: DNE

VFR Coni cal Sur f ace: DNE

VFR Appr oach Sl ope: DNE

VFR Tr ansi t i onal Sl ope: DNE

TERPS DEPARTURE PROCEDURE (FAA Order 8260. 3, Vol ume 4)

FAR 77. 17( a)

3)

Depar t ur e Sur f ace cr i t er i a ( 40: 1)

DNE Depart ure Surf ace

M NI MUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTI TUDE (MOCA)

FAR 77. 17( a} ( 4) MOCA Al t i t ude Enr out e Cr i t er i a

The Maxi mum Hei ght Perm t t ed i s 1600 f t AMSL

PRI VATE LANDI NG FACI LI TI ES

FACI L BEARI NG

RANGE DELTA

ARP FAA

I DENT TYP NAME

ELEVATI ON I FR

To FACI L I N NM

MD67 HEL DOW J ONES

CO. I NC. 63. 48 2. 79

+66

No I mpact t o Pr i vat e Landi ng Faci l i t y

St ruct ur e i s beyond not i ce l i m t by 11952 f eet .

6MD9 HEL WASHI NGTON ADVENTI ST HOSPI TA

145. 45 2. 89

+130



4/14


5MD9 HEL SUBURBAN

243. 48

3. 81

+49



DC06 HEL MPD 2ND

197. 74 5. 74

+325



DC08 . HEL WHC

+226 I FR



170. 66 5. 87

DC17 HEL CHI LDREN S HOSPI TAL

169. 71 5. 99

+146



AI R NAVI GATI ON ELECTRONI C FACI LI TI ES

FAC

GRND APCH

I DNT

ANGLE BEAR

ST

DI ST DELTA

TYPE AT FREQ VECTOR . ( f t ) ELEVA ST LOCATI ON

GTN NDB

32 215. 37 42766 +327 DC GEORGETOWN

. 44

DCA VOR/ DME

R

111. 0 179. 83 60516 +421 DC WASHI NGTON

. 40

DCA RADAR

ON 15700. 179. 38 61086 +353 VA NATI ONAL ASDE

. 33

No I mpact . Thi s st r ucture does not requi re Not i ce based upon

EM .

The st udi ed l ocat i on i s w t hi n 20 NM of a Radar f aci l i t y.

The cal cul ated Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght ( LOS) di stance i s: 36 NM

Thi s l ocat i on and hei ght i s w t hi n t he Radar Li ne-Of - Si ght .

GAI NDB N

38 325. 17

63977 - 109 MD GAI THERSBURG

- . 1

DCA RADAR ON

179. 02 65715

+346 VA RONALD REAGAN

WAS . 30

No I mpact .

Thi s st r ucture does not requi re Not i ce based upon

EM .


The cal cul ated Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght ( LOS) di stance i s: 37 NM



5/14

FCC FCC MONI TOR Y

50. 28 79621

+70 MD LAUREL

. 05

ADW

RADAR

ON 148. 15 91529

+114 MD ANDREWS AFB

. 07

No I mpact . Thi s st r uct ur e does not r equi r e Not i ce based upon

EM .


The cal cul at ed Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght ( LOS) di st ance i s: 47 NM

Thi s l ocat i on and hei ght i s w t hi n t he Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght .

ADW

VORTAC

R 113. 1 148. 63

93218

+168 MD ANDREWS

. 10

BW

RADAR

ON 60. 68 114852

+198 MD BALTI MORE-

WASHI NG

. 10

No I mpact . Thi s st r uct ur e does not r equi r e Not i ce based upon

EM .



Thi s l ocat i on and hei ght i s w t hi n t he Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght .

BAL VORTAC

I 115. 1 63. 47 119092

+291 MD BALTI MORE

. 14

I AD

RADAR

y

15700. 256. 94 119792 - 201 DC DULLES ASDE

- . 1

No I mpact . Thi s st r uct ure does not requi r e Not i ce based upon

EM .




I AD RADAR ON 2780. 258. 14 123769 +90 VA WASHI NGTON

DULLES . 04

AML VOR/ DME R 113. 5 254. 68 126562

+134 VA ARMEL

. 06

KWB RADAR WXL

y

3242.

278. 78 141426

- 159 VA WASHI NGTON

I AD LE

- . 06

OTT

VORTAC

R

113. 7 144. 53 143143 +221 MD NOTTI NGHAM

. 09

FDK VOR I

109. 0 325. 88 170307 +127 MD FREDERI CK

. 04

EM

VORTAC

R

117. 9

5. 52 171771

- 389 MD WESTM NSTER

- . 13

QPL

RADAR ARSR

y

1260. 9 254. 38 196478 - 1000 VA The Pl ai ns

- . 29

FCC AM PROOF- OF- PERFORMANCE

REQUI RED: St r ucture i s near a FCC l i censed AM radi o

stat i on Proof - of - Per f ormance i s requi red.

Pl ease

revi ew AM Stat i on Repor t f or det ai l s.

Near est AM St at i on: WBQH@ 1421 met er s.


6/14

Ai rspace Summary Vers i on 14. 1. 350

AI RSPACE and TERPS are regi st ered t rademarks of Federal Ai rways

Ai r space

Copyr i ght

1989 - 2014

03- 25- 2014

07: 13: 07


7/14

Exhibit K: Master Plan Information


8/14

C hapter Four

LAND U AND ZONING PLAN

Land UsePlan

ngland use has

, developed in RSpOnSeto

Land UsePlan: Critiall

Kensington-Wheaton's

Parcels andAmis

strategic location within

-' theCounty and region. Focus

ingon the predominantly

residential parts of Kensington

Wheaton, this Master Plan en

courages the protection,

stabilization, and continuation

of current land use patterns.

commendations on the

Most Critical Parcels and

Areas

G r ee n C o r ri do r s P o li cy

Commerc ia l Reuitalization

Land U sePlan

Kensington-Wheaton is al

most completely built out. and

it

possessesmany character

isticsof other mature areas,

Thesecharacteristics consist

mainly of;

Alimited amount of vacant

and redevelopable land

renWning.

Alimited capacity of existing

roads to accommodate

present and future traffic

volumes.

An established character and density of development.

Housing accounts for most land use in the Kensington-Wheaton

planning area, This use is characterized by a wide variety of hous

ing types. fromdetached homes on large and small lots to town

houses and garden apartments within the sector plan areas. In

terms of lifestyle preference and affordability, this housing stock

serves the residents of the area welLExcept in the sector plan areas,

commercial uses in the planning area are limited in their extent and

have shown very little tendency for recent growth. The commen.ial

and service opportunities provided in the areas now covered by the

sector plans and the commertial uses at Veirs Mill and bndolph

Roads an sufficient to accommodate the needs of the community

for the foreseeable future. Therefore, no additiorud commeitW uses

are needed within the area covered by this Plan.

It is recognized that the planning area ii at a aucial location within

the older, urbanized part of the County, located between the 1-270

and US29corridors. (See Figure 3-1,General PW . Concept, and as

sociated discussion on wedges and corridors. ) This PW\ adapb a

strategy that will balance the planning area's high transportation

acce;sibility with the vulnerability created by its position within

the region. The accessibility attnbuted to the planning area's loca

tion at the tenninWIof the Metro system and at the juncture of

numerous regional highway facilities exacerbates the area's sen

sitivity to pressures for more intensive development and eonver

sion to non-residential uses.

9


9/14

It is standard practice in all master plans adopted in Montgomery

County since 1971to designate a base Euclidean zone for r Very

parcel and to indicate for some parcels an appropriate fioating

zone which allows somewhat different development and sets a

higher limit on the intensity of development than the base zone.

Euclidean zones contain rigid requirements, such as lot size, set

backs, and height limits. Exceptwhen developed under the duster

option, the entire land area will be divided into approximately

equal size lots.

Euclidean zones m ay be applied toan entire areaby the County

Council in a comprehensive rezoning following a master plan

study. Piecemeal requests for Euclidean rezonings may be granted

only upon a showing that there has been a change in the character

of the neighbomood since the last comprehensive rezoning or

there was a mistake in that comprehensive rezoning.

Floating zones have more flexibledevelopment standards, but they

may be approved by the County Council only upon a finding that

the development will be compatible with surrounding land uses

and isin accord with the purpose clause of the zone. In all floating

zones, development can only occur in accordance with a detailed

site plan approved by the Planning Board

The practice of following a master plan with a comprehensive

rezoning through a sectional map amendment isa safeguard

against piecemeal Euclidean rezonings which could, themselves,

establish a precedent for even more rezonings. The comprehensive

rezoning establishes the base against which change or mistake

will be measured. Since the comprehenslve ruoning confonns to

the master plan, and floating zones cannot be considered changes

in the character of the neighborhood, there is a strong safeguard

against future Euclidean rezoning. Thisis an important element in

assuring the stability of the area.

As noted earlier, this Plan does not address land use issues within

sector plan boundaries exceptin one casewhere chanp un

foreseen in the original sector plan have occurred, In this instance,

a land use and zoning recommendation ismade withln the Ken

sington SectorPlan boundary (see CriticalAfta No. 16).

Objectives

Toprotect and stabilize the extent, location, and character of exist

ing residential and commercial land uses.

Tomaintain the well established low- to meclium-dmsity residen

tial character which prevails over most of the planning area.

Policies

Retain and reconfirm existing zoning for all undeveloped or under

developed land in the .Kensington-Wheaton planning area, except

for those individual parcels or groups of parcels recommmded for

a change

by

this Plan.

40


10/14


11/14

KW

M a ste r P la n fo r

th e C om m unitie s o f

Kensington Wheaton

M onJgomoy

C al m l y ,

Mayllin4

N W

QUADRANT

-,

f

NE

QUADRANT

SW

QUADRANT

42

Parcel sand Areas

Reviewed b y Th is P la n

P t. ANN ING AREA BOUNDARY

PA RCE LS A NO A RE AS W ITH

RECOMMENDED

CHANGES

(SEE

TABLE

4-1)

~ PA RCE LS A NO AR EA S W ITH NO

~ C OM ME NT S O R R EC OM ME ND ED

C H AN G ES (S E E A P P EN D IX C )

l ll u lt taUon 4 -1

- ~-Nallonal Cai>lol -~ l' ..-.no

e a . .


12/14

Chapter Five

TR NSPORT T ON

AND MOBIL/IT PLAN

S tr ee t a n d

Highway

Plan

Trans it P lan

Non-Mowriud Mobility

~

msington-Wheaton's

initial development,

par

ticularly in the town

of

Kensington, was based

on the railroad. The Baltim~

and Ohio Railroad cuts across

the southwestern comer of the

Kensington-Wheaton planning

area and Is still used by com

muters, The area's growth after

World War Il, however, was

based on the car. Public policy

isnow encouraging a greater

use ofother fonns of transpor

tation than the private

automobile. This implies thilt

means of travel other than

single-occupant commuting

wiUbe getting greater em

phasis than road improvements.

The backbone of the highway

network in the Ja

Avmue had an Average Annual Weekday Traffic (MWI) of about

131.000vehicles, West of Georgi.aAvenue, the MWT was about

144.000vehicles.

Unir ins i ty Boulevard

begins

at

Connecticut Avenue in Kensington,

almost two miles north of l- 4 9 5, and passes eastward through

Wheaton in

a

circular

fa s h io n

as a 6-lane divided highway. Turning

southwanf, itcontinues on past Four Comers and into Prince

George's County. In 1984,the MWT on University Boulevard

ranged from

1 .6 , 8 0 0

in Kensington to

3 4 , 6 5 0

in the Wheaton Busi

ness District It had an MWT of 43,450at Columbia Pike (US 29)in

Four Comers.

GeorgiaAvenue starts in the District of Columbia, crosses University

Boulevard in Wht:aton, and continues northward to Glenmont

where it also O'OS.W$ Randolph Road and is intercepted

by

LayhW

Road. In 1984,Georgia Avenue carried up to 66,550vehicles per

weekday south ofWheaton. The 1984MWT on Georgia Avenue in

Glenmont ranged from 4 0 , X X ) to 4 2 , 0 0 0 .

Comt td ic u t A v e nue has its greatest daily traffic volume in the town

of Kensington. In 1984,the MWT ranged from 54,0SOo 61,0SObe-

81


13/14

KW

M a ste r P la n fo r

th e C om m un itie s o f

K e ns in gt on W h e ato n

M m t t g o m a y C D r m l y , ~

. .

v

i W>~T

lril rtM

8

A v er a ge A n nu a l

We e kday T r a ff ic 1 9 8 4

. ; P l. ANN ING AREA BOUNDARY

0 - 1 0 , 0 0 0

1 0 , 0 0 0 - 2 0 , 0 0 0

2 0 , 0 0 0 - 3 0 , 0 0 0

30,000-40,000


14/14

Sligo Baptist Church Special Exception Application Part 2

Documents

Transcript of Sligo Baptist Church Special Exception Application Part 2