Slides for Class #11 ASU Technology Standards Seminar April 12, 2010 Brad Biddle
description
Transcript of Slides for Class #11 ASU Technology Standards Seminar April 12, 2010 Brad Biddle
1
Slides for Class #11
ASU Technology Standards Seminar
April 12, 2010
Brad Biddle
2
Introduction
Taxonom
y / “How
”
Business strategy / “W
hy”
Antitrust
IPR
: RA
ND
v. RF
IPR
(+): “O
penness”
IPR
: Patent pools
Policy: private stnds &
law
Policy: R
ole of government
Student presentations
Student presentations
*G
uest discussion re US
B
3/22 3/29 4/5 4/12 4/19 4/26
3
Different standardization history, policies, practices and cultures
4
Standards Setting Organizations (SSOs)
Formal, recognized standards development orgs (SDOs)
Consortia (sometimes “SIGs”)
“A collaboration of stakeholders with the common goal of the
standardization of a specific technology or application”
International“Big I” or “FISDOs”: ITU, ISO, IEC, JTC1
[“Little I”: e.g. ASTM, IEEE]Special Interest Groups (SIGs)
“focus on a single standard for a specific technology or
industry”
“[usually] limited to development and possibly
promotion”
“generally short-lived”
Alliances“develop multiple related
standards for a technology”
“may offer… logo and certification programs,
marketing…”
“life cycle may be relatively long”
Regionale.g. ETSI, COPANT
NationalCoordination bodies: e.g. CESI,
ANSIAccredited SSOs: e.g. TIA,
INCITS, NEMA, SAE
-Based on taxonomy described in IPO Standards Primer (Sept. 2009)
Develop “Specifications” Develop “Standards”
5
Standards Setting Organizations (SSOs)
Formal standards development orgs (SDOs)
Consortia or “SIGs”Spec licensing programs
Lightweight contractual SIGs, spec dev only
Complex 501(c)(6) orgs w/ spec dev, C&I and marketing programs
Small ANSI-accredited SDOs
ISO, IEC, ITU, JTC1
6http://publicaa.ansi.org/sites/apdl/Documents/Standards%20Activities/NSSC/USSS-2005%20-%20FINAL.pdf
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1415424
18
19
20
21
Key proposal by Winn: EU would recognize consortia-developed standards that meet certain criteria
22
23
24http://www.talkstandards.com/strategic-ict-standardization-by-china/
25
26
27
28http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2010/04/01/china%E2%80%99s-latest-draft-disposal-rules-for-patents-in-standards-a-step-forward/
29