Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation...

44
Service Organization Control 1 Type II Report Description of ViaWest, Inc.’s Colocation System For the Period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013 With Independent Service Auditor’s Assurance Report Including Tests Performed and Results Thereof

Transcript of Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation...

Page 1: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

Service Organization Control 1 Type II Report

Description of ViaWest, Inc.’s Colocation System For the Period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013

With Independent Service Auditor’s Assurance Report Including Tests Performed and Results Thereof

Page 2: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

ViaWest, Inc. Colocation System

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I.  Assertion of ViaWest, Inc. .............................................................................................. 1 

SECTION II.  Independent Service Auditor’s Assurance Report ....................................................... 4 

SECTION III.  Description of ViaWest, Inc.’s Colocation System for the Period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013 .......................................................................................... 8 

1  Scope of This Report ....................................................................................................................... 9 

2  Overview of ViaWest ...................................................................................................................... 9 

3  Overview of ViaWest’s Colocation Services ................................................................................. 10 

4  Relevant Aspects of the Control Environment, Risk Management, Information and Communication, Control Activities and Monitoring ..................................................................... 11 

Control Environment ..................................................................................................................... 11 

Risk Management .......................................................................................................................... 12 

Information and Communication ................................................................................................... 13 

Control Activities ........................................................................................................................... 13 

Monitoring ..................................................................................................................................... 13 

5  Description of Information Technology General Controls ............................................................ 14 

Logical Access ............................................................................................................................... 14 

Physical Access .............................................................................................................................. 16 

Change Management ..................................................................................................................... 18 

Monitoring and Incident Management ........................................................................................... 18 

Environmental Systems ................................................................................................................. 21 

SECTION IV.  Description of Control Objectives, Controls, Tests and Results of Tests ................. 24 

1  Testing Performed and Results of Tests of Entity-Level Controls ................................................ 25 

Logical Access ............................................................................................................................... 26 

Physical Access .............................................................................................................................. 30 

Change Management ..................................................................................................................... 35 

Monitoring and Incident Management ........................................................................................... 37 

Environmental Systems ................................................................................................................. 40 

Page 3: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

1

SECTION I. ASSERTION OF VIAWEST, INC.

Page 4: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

2

ViaWest, Inc.’s Management Assertion

We have prepared the accompanying Description of ViaWest, Inc.’s Colocation System for the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013 (Description) for users of the ViaWest’s Colocation System (System) during some or all of the period (user entities), and their independent auditors who have a sufficient understanding to consider the Description, along with other information, including information about controls implemented by user entities themselves, when assessing the risks of material misstatements of user entities’ financial statements. ViaWest, Inc. (ViaWest) confirms, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that:

a. the Description fairly presents the System made available to user entities during the period from October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013, for hosting customer hardware and infrastructure. The criteria we used in making this assertion were that the Description:

(1) presents how the System made available to user entities was designed and implemented, including:

the types of services provided

the procedures, within both automated and manual systems, by which those services are provided to user entities

the related supporting information; this includes the correction of incorrect information and how information is transferred to the reports prepared for user entities

how the System captures and addresses significant events and conditions

the process used to prepare reports or other information provided to user entities

specified control objectives and controls designed to achieve those objectives

controls that, in designing the System, ViaWest contemplated would be implemented by user entities in order to achieve the specified control objectives (Complementary User Entity Controls)

other aspects of ViaWest’s control environment, risk assessment process, information and communication systems (including the related business processes), control activities and monitoring controls that are relevant to the services provided

Page 5: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

3

(2) does not omit or distort information relevant to the scope of the System, while acknowledging that the Description is prepared to meet the common needs of a broad range of user entities and their independent auditors, and may not, therefore, include every aspect of the System that each individual user entity and its independent auditor may consider important in the user entity’s own particular environment

b. the Description includes relevant details of changes to the System during the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013.

c. the controls related to the control objectives stated in the Description, which together with the complementary user entity controls referred to above if suitably designed and operating effectively, were suitably designed and operated effectively throughout the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013, to achieve those control objectives. The criteria we used in making this assertion were that:

(1) the risks that threaten the achievement of the control objectives stated in the Description have been identified by the service organization

(2) the controls identified in the Description would, if operating as described, provide reasonable assurance that those risks would not prevent those control objectives stated in the Description from being achieved

(3) the controls were consistently applied as designed, including whether manual controls were applied by individuals who have the appropriate competence and authority

ViaWest, Inc. October 14, 2013

Page 6: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

4

SECTION II. INDEPENDENT SERVICE AUDITOR’S ASSURANCE

REPORT

Page 7: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

5

Independent Service Auditor’s Assurance Report The Board of Directors ViaWest, Inc. Scope

We have examined ViaWest, Inc.’s (ViaWest, a wholly owned subsidiary of RNB Communications, Inc.) accompanying Description of ViaWest, Inc.’s Colocation System for the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013 (Description) and the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of controls described therein to achieve the related control objectives stated in the Description. The Description indicates that certain control objectives specified in the Description can be achieved only if complementary user entity controls contemplated in the design of ViaWest’s controls are suitably designed and operating effectively, along with related controls at the service organization. We have not evaluated the suitability of the design or operating effectiveness of such complementary user entity controls.

ViaWest’s Responsibilities

ViaWest has provided the accompanying assertion titled Assertion of ViaWest, Inc. (Assertion) about the fairness of the presentation of the Description and suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of the controls described therein to achieve the related control objectives stated in the Description. ViaWest is responsible for preparing the Description and the Assertion, including the completeness, accuracy, and method of presentation of the Description and the Assertion; providing the services covered by the Description; specifying the control objectives and stating them in the Description; identifying the risks that threaten the achievement of the control objectives; selecting the criteria stated in the Assertion; and designing, implementing, and documenting controls to achieve the related control objectives stated in the Description.

Service Auditor’s Responsibilities

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the fairness of the presentation of the Description and on the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of the controls described therein to achieve the related control objectives stated in the Description, based on our examination. We conducted our examination in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Our examination was also performed in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3402, Assurance Reports on Controls at a Service Organization, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform our examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether, in all material respects, the Description is fairly presented and the controls described therein were suitably designed and

Ernst & Young LLP Suite 3300 370 17th Street Denver, CO 80202

Tel: +1 720 931 4000 Fax: +1 720 931 4444 ey.com

Page 8: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

6

operating effectively to achieve the related control objectives stated in the Description throughout the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013.

An examination of a description of a service organization’s system and the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of the service organization’s controls described therein to achieve the related control objectives stated in the Description involve performing procedures to obtain evidence about the fairness of the presentation of the Description and the suitability of the design and operating effectiveness of those controls to achieve the related control objectives. Our procedures included assessing the risks that the Description is not fairly presented and that the controls were not suitably designed or operating effectively to achieve the related control objectives. Our procedures also included testing the operating effectiveness of those controls that we consider necessary to provide reasonable assurance that the related control objectives were achieved. An examination engagement of this type also includes evaluating the overall presentation of the Description, the suitability of the control objectives, and the suitability of the criteria specified by the service organization and described in the Assertion. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Inherent Limitations

The Description is prepared to meet the common needs of a broad range of user entities and their independent auditors and may not, therefore, include every aspect of the system that each individual customer may consider important in its own particular environment. Because of their nature, controls at a service organization may not prevent, or detect and correct, all errors or omissions related to the Colocation System that hosts customer hardware and infrastructure. Also, the projection to the future of any evaluation of the fairness of the presentation of the Description, or conclusions about the suitability of the design or operating effectiveness of the controls to achieve the related control objectives, is subject to the risk that controls at a service organization may become ineffective or fail.

Opinion

In our opinion, in all material respects, based on the criteria described in ViaWest’s Assertion:

a. The Description fairly presents the Colocation System that was designed and implemented throughout the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013.

b. The controls related to the control objectives stated in the Description were suitably designed to provide reasonable assurance that the control objectives would be achieved if the controls operated effectively throughout the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013, and if user entities applied the complementary user entity controls contemplated in the design of ViaWest’s controls throughout the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013.

Page 9: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

7

c. The controls tested, which, together with the complementary user entity controls referred to in the scope paragraph of this report, if operating effectively, were those necessary to provide reasonable assurance that the control objectives stated in the Description were achieved and operated effectively throughout the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013.

Description of Tests of Controls

The specific controls tested and the nature, timing, and results of those tests are listed in the accompanying Description of Control Objectives, Controls, Tests and Results of Tests (Description of Tests and Results).

Restricted Use

This report, including the description of tests of controls and results thereof in the Description of Tests and Results, is intended solely for the information and use of ViaWest, user entities of ViaWest’s Colocation System during some or all of the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013, and the independent auditors of such user entities who have a sufficient understanding to consider it, along with other information, including information about controls implemented by user entities themselves, when assessing the risks of material misstatements of user entities’ financial statements. This report is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.

ey October 14, 2013

Page 10: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

8

SECTION III. DESCRIPTION OF VIAWEST, INC.’S COLOCATION

SYSTEM FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 2012 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

Page 11: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

9

1 Scope of This Report

This report includes a description of ViaWest, Inc.’s Colocation System provided at 23 datacenters located in Denver, Colorado; Salt Lake City, Utah; Hillsboro, Oregon; Las Vegas, Nevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant to the internal control of user entities (also referred to as customers or customer organizations). This report is focused solely on colocation services and does not extend to managed or cloud services; however, colocation services support managed and cloud services to an extent.

The following description is intended to provide ViaWest customer organizations and the independent auditors of those customer organizations with information about the control activities of the colocation services provided by ViaWest. The description of the System includes certain information technology (IT) general controls that support the delivery of ViaWest’s colocation services. This report does not encompass all aspects of the services provided or procedures followed in connection with ViaWest’s Colocation System.

The following description is intended to provide sufficient information for such user entities and their independent auditors to obtain an understanding of the System and controls in place over ViaWest’s colocation services to plan their audits. The description has been prepared in accordance with the guidance contained in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 16, Reporting on Controls at a Service Organization, and International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) No. 3402, Assurance Reports on Controls at a Service Organization, including their respective amendments and interpretations.

ViaWest’s Description has also been prepared to enable relevant user entities to gain an understanding of ViaWest’s control activities for purposes of assisting management in its assessment of internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (PCAOB) Auditing Standard (AS) No. 5, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That is Integrated With an Audit of Financial Statements. Since this report focuses primarily on ViaWest’s Colocation System, significant customer transactions, which are not processed by ViaWest, are not included in this report. However, ViaWest supports the infrastructure that allows for system uptime and physical access, which, in turn, could affect the processing of financial transactions. As such, this report should only be used by customers and the user auditors to gain comfort over physical access to financial reporting systems and the systems that support the physical access environment that may be hosted at the ViaWest facilities. Significant financial reports are not processed or generated by ViaWest and, as such, have no relevance within the scope of this report.

2 Overview of ViaWest

ViaWest was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Denver, Colorado. ViaWest is currently managed by the same management team that originally started the company. During its 14-year history, ViaWest has grown organically and through acquisition and is now one of the largest

Page 12: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

10

privately held colocation providers in the United States and employs over 300 employees across the United States.

3 Overview of ViaWest’s Colocation Services

ViaWest’s datacenter facilities are accessible 24 hours a day and are staffed by employees skilled and experienced in hosting operations, datacenter management and customer service. The datacenters are equipped with the latest environmental and security equipment, including redundant heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems; dry pipe and multi-zone fire detection systems; uninterruptible power supply (UPS); and generator backups for all datacenter operations. ViaWest has also implemented physical access measures such as badge card access, personal identification numbers (PIN) and biometric fingerprint scans, and video surveillance with 24-hour monitoring by the local or remote Network Operations Centers (NOC).

The colocation network is supported by various networking devices, including datacenter routers and switches that connect to internet service providers. The devices are secured through various logical security measures, including Access Control Lists (ACLs) and strong password configurations. The network devices are monitored 24/7 by NOC personnel to help ensure delivery of the colocation services and to help ensure that customer systems do not experience downtime due to a security or related availability event.

ViaWest colocation services are supported by a number of functional groups, each with its own roles and responsibilities specific to supporting the business. Management responsibilities within ViaWest have been segregated by appropriate functions, with vice presidents, directors and managers providing leadership and accountability for their respective areas.

ViaWest provides services in six geographic locations within the United States. There are 23 physical locations that support colocation services. ViaWest operates gross raised floor square footage of more than 450,000 square feet. Colocation services within ViaWest’s datacenter facilities are currently provided from the following regional locations:

Denver, Colorado Salt Lake City, Utah Las Vegas, Nevada Hillsboro, Oregon Austin, Texas Dallas, Texas

All datacenter operations are supported and managed by the ticketing system (i.e., Cadence). The system is also used to notify, track and manage any issues that may arise within the datacenters. Logical access to various systems is controlled via a Global Directory Services implementation or through ACLs defined on network devices. ViaWest also utilizes security measures to help ensure that access to network devices is controlled in a secure manner using encryption and strong password and security settings.

Page 13: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

11

4 Relevant Aspects of the Control Environment, Risk Management, Information and Communication, Control Activities and Monitoring

Control Environment

Integrity and Ethical Values

Integrity and high ethical standards are qualities essential to the business of ViaWest and are fundamental standards of behavior for employees. At ViaWest, the standards of integrity and ethics are demonstrated daily by the personal conduct of management and various controls, including guidelines for handling sensitive information, invention agreements, security policies and policies stipulating that employees comply with laws, regulations and corporate policies as a condition of continued employment. In addition, employees are required to acknowledge ViaWest’s stated values and confirm their commitment to upholding these values by performing their responsibilities in a professional and ethical manner. ViaWest employees are required to report potential violations or exceptions to these policies that they suspect are being performed by another employee, contractor or outsider.

Commitment to Competence

The competence of employees is a key element of the control environment. ViaWest is committed to the development of its employees. This commitment to competence is expressed in the company’s personnel policies and related human resource programs. Specific indicators of the commitment to personnel development include recruiting and hiring policies and investment in training and development.

ViaWest’s commitment to competence begins with recruiting, which is the joint responsibility of the Human Resources Department and business unit managers. Hiring decisions are based on various factors, including educational background, prior relative experience, past accomplishments, and evidence of integrity and ethical behavior. In addition, prospective employees will go through reference and background checks before they are hired.

Assignment of Authority and Responsibility

The control environment is greatly influenced by the extent to which individuals recognize that they will be held accountable. This includes assignment of authority and responsibility for operating activities and establishment of reporting relationships and authorization protocols. Policies describing appropriate business practices, knowledge and experience required of key personnel, and resources are communicated to employees for carrying out their duties.

Standard Operating Controls

The Human Resources Department communicates to employees expected levels of integrity, ethical behavior and competence. Such practices relate to hiring, orientation, training, evaluation, counseling, promotion, compensation and remedial actions.

Page 14: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

12

ViaWest’s approach to customer service begins with its staff. The organization has attracted and retained a diversified group of experienced professionals. ViaWest’s hiring practices are designed to help ensure that new employees are qualified for their job responsibilities. ViaWest’s hiring policies and guidelines assist in selecting qualified applicants for specific job responsibilities. Employee training is accomplished through supervised on-the-job training, formal in-house training courses, online learning and external continuing education programs. Department managers are responsible for overseeing the training and development of qualified employees for current and future responsibilities.

Background checks are required for ViaWest employees, regardless of job function. Applicants first complete an application and an Authorization Check Form (for the background check). The background check is sent to a third-party vendor which then runs Social Security, criminal (local, national and federal) and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) checks; employment history verification; and a motor vehicle check on the individual. Credit checks are only conducted for potential employees in certain finance roles. Background checks are obtained prior to the finalization of an offer. In addition, offer letters mention that offers are pending satisfactory background and reference checks, in case an issue arises in the future.

New hires meet with the Human Resources Department within their first two days and review new hire information, including the confidentiality agreement. If the agreement is not signed within 48 hours of hiring, the new employee cannot report to work until the document has been signed.

All ViaWest personnel are required to attend security training. Additional training in facilities operations, safety and security is required for service support roles. A form illustrating required training must be completed and management’s approval for permanent access is required to document and track permanent datacenter access authorizations. Also, periodic security update training decks are created by management and distributed to employees.

Risk Management

ViaWest has placed into operation a risk assessment process to identify and manage risks that could affect ViaWest’s ability to provide services to its customers. This process requires management to identify significant risks in its areas of responsibility and to implement appropriate measures to address these risks. Operations management meets monthly, or more frequently if necessary, to review the status of each area of the company’s operations and to assess risks that could affect service delivery to its customers. Also, management holds After Action Review Board (AARB) meetings on a weekly basis to discuss any issues that occurred during the prior week and which improvements can be made in operations to help prevent the issue from occurring again. The meeting consists of team leads, managers and directors from ViaWest’s Operations group.

Information accumulated and discussed during monthly and AARB meetings is also fed into the Risk Assessment and Governance Council (RAGC) meeting that is held, at a minimum, quarterly. ViaWest created this council to enable ViaWest to better identify risks, discuss remediation plans for identified risks and develop action plans to remediate risks identified to

Page 15: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

13

help improve ViaWest security and availability obligations to its customers. The meeting consists of individuals from various groups throughout the organization, but primarily representatives from Legal, Security, Service Delivery, Engineering and Operations attend the meeting.

Information and Communication

ViaWest management is committed to maintaining effective communication with personnel and customers. To help align business strategies and goals with operating performance as it relates to customers, the Operations Management Team participates in weekly meetings in order to discuss the status of service delivery, capacity planning, quality performance, help desk statistics and other matters of interest or concern.

The Executive Management Team meets monthly to discuss ViaWest’s strategic initiatives, as well as to address operational risks and concerns. The CEO meets with management on a monthly basis to review key performance metrics and strategic initiatives and to provide an overview of the company’s performance to date.

In addition to the above communication methods, colocation customers have been given access to ViaWest’s internal ticketing system, Cadence, through MySupport, an online portal. This enables customers to report incidents and issues relating to their systems.

Control Activities

Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure management directives are carried out. They help ensure that necessary actions are taken to address risks to the achievement of the entity’s objectives. Control activities, whether automated or manual, generally relate to the achievement of specific control objectives and are applied at various organizational and functional levels.

Specific control activities are provided in the Control Environment, Information Technology General Controls and Overview of ViaWest’s Colocation Services descriptions above and in the Description of Control Objectives, Controls, Tests and Results of Tests below.

Monitoring

Management and supervisory personnel monitor the quality of internal controls as part of their activities. ViaWest has implemented a series of management reports and metrics that measure the results of various processes involved in providing services to its customers. Some of the key metrics that Operations Management monitors are as follows:

1. Capacity Power Space Cooling Generator

Page 16: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

14

Network

2. Quality of Service Network uptime Backbone availability Facility uptime

3. Network Operations Center

Support call answer speeds Support call volumes Average talk time

The ViaWest Security, Operations and Compliance teams are responsible for implementing procedures and guidelines to identify the risks inherent in ViaWest’s operations. The foundation of the risk management process is management’s knowledge of its operations and its close working relationship with its customers. For any risks identified, management is responsible for implementing appropriate measures. Monitoring of risks is coordinated out of the Security, Operations and Compliance teams and reported during monthly AARB or RAGC meetings.

5 Description of Information Technology General Controls

This section provides a description of the control activities performed by ViaWest specific to the ViaWest Colocation System. These control activities are designed to help ensure the proper authorization, accuracy, completeness and timeliness of physical access, logical security access, network change management and operations functions.

Logical Access

New or Modified User Access

Employees have access to ViaWest systems, applications and network devices, with access level restrictions based on specific job function(s) the user is performing for ViaWest.

New access to the network and ticketing system is administered by the Human Resources Department. Access rights are automatically assigned based on the function/role the Human Resources Department inputs into the system for the new hire.

Addition and change requests to access permissions beyond function/role defaults are submitted by managers or the individuals requiring the new access and are systematically routed to authorized logical access administrators and system owners. Logical access administrators must approve or deny requests before implementation of permission changes may occur. Changes in roles result in a reevaluation of access rights, and permissions are reset as appropriate.

Access to network devices is controlled by the implementation of ACLs that limit where connections can be made from, and TACACS+ and RSA SecurID two-factor authentication tokens. All users have unique usernames and PINs in addition to the token. Authentication

Page 17: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

15

tokens change on a fixed interval, either 30, 60 or 120 seconds. PINs are not required to change on any fixed schedule.

Permission levels in network devices are further restricted by different group tier assignments. Access for a group tier is requested based on the necessity of the job function and must be approved by Logical Access Administrators before access is granted.

Terminated Users

The Human Resources Department initiates the employee termination process and revokes the employee’s logical access to ViaWest’s corporate active directory authentication system. The Human Resources Department or the employee’s supervisor conducts an exit interview with the terminated employee and collects physical access tokens. A termination notification is generated for relevant departments to authorize access revocations from other ViaWest facilities, network devices and systems.

User Access Reviews

To help ensure that access to systems, applications and network devices remains authorized and appropriate over time, management performs user logical access reviews on users who have access to the ticketing system and the colocation network devices. This review consists of inspecting the entire user base of each system to verify that no terminated employees have access to the systems and to verify that users’ current access rights are still required and appropriate based on job changes or roles they are currently fulfilling within the organization. Any exceptions identified by management are sent to logical access administrators of the respective systems for resolution, and the changed access lists are revalidated for completion of the review by management.

Privileged User Access

Privileged administrator access to the ticketing system is commensurate with job function and is limited to executives, senior management and developers. This access is systematically enforced through group permissions and application logic. Only authorized employees can add and modify user access to the system.

Privileged administrative access to network devices is commensurate with job function and is limited to the Engineering and Production Support teams. In order to access the network devices, ViaWest has created Access Control Lists on each device to allow only certain IP addresses the ability to connect to the device. The administrator must also be defined to a specific group on the TACACS+ server in order to administer the network devices. These configurations are defined on each network device.

Page 18: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

16

Password Controls and Security

Access to the ticketing system is restricted using password authentication guidelines requiring that passwords be of a minimum length, conform to complexity requirements, expire periodically and be different from a previous number of passwords to help prevent unauthorized access to the system.

The network devices are accessed from ViaWest-approved IP addresses. The IP addresses are defined on each network device through the use of ACLs. After a user connects to the device from an authorized IP address, the user must authenticate to the device using his or her TACACS+ credentials. The TACACS+ server requires a user name, PIN and token in order to access the network device.

Physical Access

General Physical Access

The physical access of the datacenters is the responsibility of NOC personnel, along with coordination by the Vice President of Engineering, acting in the capacity of Chief Security Officer. Physical access to ViaWest locations is monitored by NOC personnel 24x7x365.

Physical access to each of the ViaWest datacenters is controlled through various preventative measures. To help ensure that only authorized employees, customers or vendors have access to the datacenters, ViaWest has implemented electronic card key systems. In order for any one individual to access the raised floor area, he or she must have a valid and approved access card for that specific datacenter. After an individual scans his or her card, the individual must also have knowledge of the PIN or the correct biometric reading associated to the badge in order to gain entry to the raised floor area.

After an individual authenticates to the raised floor area, a user must also have access to the customer’s equipment through the use of either another lock and key, PIN or biometric reader. Each customer is allocated his or her own space through the use of secured racks, cages or suites.

All datacenter physical access activity is monitored through the use of various monitoring systems. Each ViaWest datacenter has security cameras installed to monitor and record physical access events. Data is recorded based on activity/motion, up to available memory capacity. The standard data retention period for key areas is 90 days, but may vary slightly between ViaWest datacenter locations due to activity captured and capacity. Datacenter doors also have monitoring systems in place to alert NOC personnel regarding doors that remain open too long, doors that are forced open or doors that are opened that should remain closed. NOC personnel also monitor physical activity throughout each datacenter since all camera activity is fed into the NOC.

NOC personnel perform observation rounds of each datacenter throughout each day to physically inspect each datacenter’s building exterior, docks, storage facilities, security cameras and security systems. This helps to ensure that physical access systems are operating as designed.

Page 19: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

17

New or Modified Employee Physical Access

All ViaWest personnel are required to attend security training. Additional training in facilities operations, safety and security is also required for individuals in service support roles who will be granted access to ViaWest datacenters. A form illustrating that required datacenter training has been completed and management’s approval for physical access are required in order for an employee to gain datacenter access.

Vendor Access

To authorize access for a vendor, a Vendor Access List (VAL) form must be completed. This form must be approved by a ViaWest vice president who is a member of the Operations group or executive management or a datacenter manager and the vendor’s Single Point of Contact (SPOC). The badge issued in response to the approved VAL form will allow the vendor access to the datacenter locations specified on the VAL.

Customer Access

Each customer must identify the individuals (employees or third-party vendors) who are authorized to access colocation facilities on their behalf. Authorized access is managed through the customer’s MySupport portal account by a customer-designated User Administrator. The customer’s User Administrator accesses the MySupport portal and specifies an individual as authorized to access facilities on his or her behalf. Authorization may be for either a permanent access badge or a day pass only. The MySupport system generates a ticket for ViaWest NOC staff to act upon for each occurrence. The same process applies for revocation of access.

The requested datacenter does not generate the badge until the requested user comes on-site. In order to obtain an access badge, the user must present a valid government-issued picture ID. Additionally, the user is provided a copy of ViaWest’s datacenter rules.

Physical Access Reviews

Physical access reviews are performed semiannually to help ensure that only authorized employees, vendors and customers maintain access to the ViaWest datacenters. Physical access lists are generated from each datacenter and are compared to current employee, customer and vendor authorized access lists. Any exceptions noted are recorded and tracked to resolution.

Key Access

Within each datacenter, customer environments are physically secured within a locked cage, cabinet or suite. Customer cabinets and cages are secured by keyed locks (keys secured via lock box), combination locks, card readers and/or key pads per the customer’s choice.

Master keys are kept in a secure environment not accessible to customers or vendors. Operational vice presidents are authorized to have master keys. NOC staff are required to carry

Page 20: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

18

master keys, as are datacenter managers and their reports (i.e., those who perform customer installations).

The Lindon, Utah, datacenter is staffed by Allied Security. Allied Security acts in the capacity of a ViaWest employee and performs certain ViaWest controls under the supervision and monitoring of ViaWest. Allied Security is specifically responsible for:

Performing rounds/walk-throughs of the Lindon datacenter; and Confirming that people are authorized before they are granted key access to the

datacenter (i.e., the function performed by the security guard at the front desk). Allied Security has access to the datacenter access list in Cadence, but this access is limited to view-only access.

ViaWest’s responsibilities in regard to the Lindon datacenter include:

Maintaining the physical access lists in Cadence (along with customers who submit additions, modifications and deletions)

Change Management

Maintenance Windows

Network changes that are known to, or have the potential to, affect customer services are placed in a scheduled maintenance window. Weekly time frames are set aside in case maintenance is necessary. If a maintenance window is necessary outside of the time frame set aside each week, ViaWest management approves the maintenance window using the mwindow in ViaWest’s proprietary Maintenance Window system. The outage is also posted on the ViaWest customer support portal, MySupport.com.

Non-routine changes are tested in a test lab and approved by authorized management personnel. To minimize network device configuration problems, RANCID is utilized to create snapshots of each device configuration. Each night, RANCID pulls the device configurations in order to have an updated “snapshot” of the device configuration.

Daily, RANCID generates email notifications. These email notifications go to the Network Operations team. The Network Operations team reviews these emails to verify that appropriate activity is occurring on the network devices.

Monitoring and Incident Management

ViaWest has implemented monitoring controls at all of its datacenters to enable monitoring of critical environmental systems, customer systems and the hosting network. Tools are used to monitor these critical systems; if issues are identified, other tools are used to track and remediate any incidents that occur. All datacenters are monitored 24x7 by physical site staff or remote hands.

Page 21: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

19

Management has also implemented other controls to review incidents that occurred during a given month to determine whether there are any trends or security or availability issues that may need greater attention.

In order to monitor systems and provide for system stability, datacenters are monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The Hillsboro, Oregon; Arapahoe, Denver; Champa, Denver; Wazee, Denver; Cornell, Denver; Delong, Salt Lake City; Synergy Park, Dallas; 1000 West Carson 2, Las Vegas; Lone Mountain, Las Vegas; and Dallas Infomart Network Operations Centers are staffed with ViaWest personnel on-site, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Additionally, all datacenters have building management systems that provide alarming of all critical infrastructure equipment.

The Cottonwood, Salt Lake City; and Presidents, Salt Lake City, datacenters have an on-site NOC; however, it is not staffed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. During hours when it is not staffed on-site, it is monitored by personnel at the Delong, Salt Lake City NOC using the building management system, the NimBUS alert system, the datacenter’s card access system and the system that provides direct visual feeds from the security cameras.

The Austin datacenter does not have an on-site NOC. ViaWest employees staff and monitor the datacenter during normal business hours. Outside of business hours, the facility is monitored remotely by personnel at ViaWest’s Dallas NOC, and local personnel provide on-call support. A building management system provides monitoring and alarming.

The facilities at 302 and 304 East Carson Avenue, Las Vegas, are monitored on a 24x7 basis by the NOC located at the 304 East Carson datacenter.

Monitoring and Alert Systems

ViaWest employs tools for monitoring and alerting of systems, servers, services and network devices. Checks of the ViaWest environment performed by the Nagios and NimBUS monitoring tools include both internal and external checks. External checks, where the system queries the target server from the outside, permit ViaWest to monitor services such as HTTP, FTP, SMTP and DNS and to verify open ports (both TCP and UDP). Internal checks, where the monitored system is evaluated from inside the target system itself, allow for significantly more detailed monitoring data points. Common checks are CPU utilization and log messages, which can be configured to trigger an alarm notification.

The ViaWest monitoring tools are distributed across many facilities and consist of numerous systems. This permits monitoring to occur as close to the target systems as possible. Easy access to the current state of monitored systems is accessible via the tool’s web-based status interface. ViaWest NOCs continuously display this interface to stay abreast of the overall health of the monitored systems and devices.

The monitoring tools have been implemented to automatically trigger events (ticket creation and staff notification) directly in the ViaWest ticketing system and via phone/email. This integration

Page 22: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

20

between the ticketing system and the monitoring tools allows alarms to be automatically assigned to the appropriate on-call individual for resolution.

Incident Management

The ViaWest ticketing system uses information from the monitoring tools for both customer and internal devices. There is a dedicated person in the NOC 24x7x365 responsible for addressing alerts displayed within the application. The ticketing system can have an alert with a priority 0 through 5. The priorities are as follows:

A priority 0 ticket is received via the monitoring tool and is defined as not yet evaluated by an engineer so as to be assigned the appropriate priority going forward. The priority 0 queue is monitored 24x7x365, and tickets are immediately evaluated and assigned the appropriate priority level by Solutions Engineers within the NOC.

A priority 1 ticket is defined by an event that affects multiple customers. These tickets are opened manually by specific individuals. When appropriate, an Incident Response Team (IRT) conference call is convened by the NOC with senior leadership to discuss impact and plans to mitigate or solve.

A priority 2 ticket is defined by an event where a single customer environment is down or critically affected. If there is continuous downtime for 60 minutes, senior management is paged and notified of the downtime. Senior management then contacts the NOC to discuss the resolution plan.

Priority 3 tickets can be created by a Solutions Engineer if it is determined that the event is urgent, but not a customer down event.

Priority 4 tickets are reserved for customer questions. Priority 5 tickets are reserved for project work.

A customer can prioritize its tickets based on the impact to its business. A customer is notified depending on the priority and surrounding situation. If a customer is required to be notified, an account manager (or his or her backup) contacts the customer to discuss resolution.

When a customer issue arises, ViaWest account management is notified in one of several ways: ticket notifications through Cadence, email or a direct phone call from NOC staff. The account management team will contact the customer as necessary while the on-call staff works to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.

Work related to a customer-initiated problem ticket is performed on customer systems as requested by authorized customer representatives over the phone or utilizing the customer’s MySupport portal.

Monthly Metrics Review

Call metrics are reviewed on a monthly basis. Senior NOC engineers take a selection of tickets to confirm that call and support metrics are being met; if there are exceptions, ViaWest will develop a resolution plan.

Page 23: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

21

Environmental Systems

ViaWest datacenters are equipped with environmental systems to help ensure that customer systems are available, protected and monitored.

Each datacenter is equipped with UPS and generator systems to help ensure that datacenters are supported by redundant power sources so that customer systems remain available. Each UPS device is configured to provide sufficient power to support the entire datacenter until the generator kicks on to provide continued power. Each generator maintains an appropriate fuel supply, and each datacenter contracts with a third-party fuel provider to refuel the tanks as necessary.

Datacenters are also equipped with heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. Each datacenter is supported by a sufficient number of HVAC systems to allow for N+1 cooling redundancy on the raised floor.

Each datacenter is equipped with fire monitoring and prevention systems and with fire extinguishers throughout the facility.

All environmental systems are monitored by ViaWest systematically and by visual inspection.

Recurring Site Inspections

Every day, site personnel periodically perform physical inspections of staffed datacenters to verify that all critical systems and access security solutions are operational and that environmental operating conditions remain within acceptable ranges. If a deviation is observed, the technician will log the event and create a trouble ticket for corrective actions.

Generator Testing and Inspections

All generators are subject to one annual preventative maintenance procedure. In addition, all generators are engaged for “start-up and run” operation at least once per month. Operating results are logged, and any issues are noted for follow-up and timely resolution.

Power Management and Semiannual UPS Inspections

Power management equipment is in place at each datacenter for:

A dedicated utility step-down transformer; and An automatic transfer switch that is connected to standby diesel generators.

The mission critical electrical loads at each datacenter are sourced by UPS systems.

In addition, semiannual preventative maintenance procedures are performed on all UPS systems and batteries.

Page 24: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

22

ViaWest also contracts with an outside vendor to perform annual infrared scans of all Power Distribution Unit (PDU) systems. Any issues identified during the annual visit are noted for follow-up and resolved.

Fire Detection and Suppression Equipment and Inspections

Fire detection and suppression equipment is installed in all datacenters. Annual fire inspection and preventative maintenance procedures are performed to confirm that the detection and suppression equipment is operating within optimal ranges.

HVAC Equipment

Each datacenter has an adequate supply of cooling capacity to support cooling requirements in the event of a loss of any critical cooling component.

Preventative maintenance is performed every three months, at a minimum, on all cooling equipment. Building management systems alarm and notify datacenter managers if humidity or temperature thresholds are breached.

Maintenance windows are opened and approved by authorized personnel prior to performing any necessary repairs and maintenance.

Network Availability

Each datacenter maintains redundant links to the internet and other ViaWest datacenters. Devices are configured to be monitored in the monitoring tool and are not accessible for management access outside the ViaWest network. Additionally, the network design supports redundancy for critical network components, and 24x7 monitoring procedures are in place at NOCs to monitor ViaWest and customer systems. Monitoring systems are redundant to provide failover capability, and current network diagrams are available for use by authorized users.

Backups

All ViaWest network devices are backed up nightly. ViaWest uses RANCID to track changes to the network device configurations and maintain the most up-to-date copy of the configurations.

Control Objectives and Controls

The control objectives specified by ViaWest and the controls that achieve those control objectives are listed in the accompanying Description of Control Objectives, Controls, Tests and Results of Tests.

Page 25: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

23

Complementary User Entity Controls

In designing its system, ViaWest has contemplated that certain complementary controls would be implemented by user entities to achieve certain control objectives included in this report. The complementary user entities’ controls are listed in the accompanying Description of Control Objectives, Controls, Tests and Results of Tests.

Page 26: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

24

SECTION IV. DESCRIPTION OF CONTROL OBJECTIVES, CONTROLS, TESTS AND RESULTS OF TESTS

Page 27: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

25

1 Testing Performed and Results of Tests of Entity-Level Controls

In planning the nature, timing and extent of our testing of the controls specified by ViaWest, we considered the aspects of ViaWest’s control environment and performed the following tests of the entity-level internal controls as we considered necessary in the circumstance:

Inquired of management and inspected job posting documentation related to ViaWest’s hiring practices to determine whether verification of applicant qualifications was confirmed upon hire

Inspected a sample of employees to determine whether security awareness training was provided

Inspected Human Resources Department practices to determine whether all new hires were subjected to formal background checks

Inspected new hire documentation to determine whether the new hire signed the ViaWest Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)

Inspected documentation of calendar invites and meeting minutes for a sample of weeks to determine whether AARB meetings were held

Inspected documentation of RAGC calendar invites and meeting minutes for a sample of quarters to determine whether RAGC meetings were held

Inspected a sample of ViaWest job positions to determine whether job descriptions were available for the sampled positions

Inspected a sample of new hire files to determine whether a job description was included in the file and validated as part of their interview and on-boarding procedures

No deviations noted.

* * * * * On the pages that follow, the description of control objectives and the controls to achieve the objectives have been specified by, and are the responsibility of, ViaWest. The testing performed and the results of tests are the responsibility of Ernst & Young LLP. The testing performed was conducted across all ViaWest facilities.

Page 28: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

26

Logical Access

Control Objective #1: Controls provide reasonable assurance that logical access to applications, data and computer resources is restricted to authorized and appropriate users to protect applications and network devices from unauthorized modification. Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

1.1 Administrative access to ViaWest support systems, applications and network devices is limited to authorized personnel.

Inspected all accounts with administrator access to Cadence to determine whether the account owner assigned was approved and whether the access assigned was commensurate with the individual’s job function. Inspected accounts with administrative access to network devices to determine whether the account owners were authorized to have such access and whether the access was commensurate with their job functions. Inspected IP addresses with permitted access to a sample of ViaWest network devices to determine whether such addresses were limited to ViaWest internal IP addresses.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Page 29: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

27

Logical Access Control Objective #1: Controls provide reasonable assurance that logical access to applications, data and computer resources is restricted to authorized and appropriate users to protect applications and network devices from unauthorized modification. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

1.2 Strong password settings, including minimum length, complexity requirements, password expiration and password history, are configured and in place to restrict access to systems, network devices and applications.

Inspected Cadence system password settings to determine whether password settings were in conformance with ViaWest security policies. Inspected Active Directory password security configurations to determine whether password settings were in conformance with ViaWest security policies. Observed a network engineer authenticate to a selected network device to determine whether the engineer was required to authenticate with a distinct username and token. Inspected a sample of network devices to determine whether each selected device was configured in accordance with ViaWest password configuration policies for network devices.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Page 30: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

28

Logical Access Control Objective #1: Controls provide reasonable assurance that logical access to applications, data and computer resources is restricted to authorized and appropriate users to protect applications and network devices from unauthorized modification. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

1.3 New or modified access to ViaWest systems is authorized by an appropriate manager.

Inspected profiles for a sample of new Cadence accounts to determine whether access to ViaWest systems was configured according to department default roles. If additional access was granted, determined through inspection of the Staff Ladder history that additional access was requested and approved by an appropriate manager.

No deviations noted.

1.4 Terminated employees are communicated by the Human Resources Department to management via email notifications and/or the Cadence ticketing system. Management disables terminated employees from the ViaWest applications and network systems upon receipt of this notification.

Inspected evidence for a sample of terminated employees to determine whether their logical access to the ViaWest Cadence and network systems was removed.

No deviations noted.

Page 31: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

29

Logical Access Control Objective #1: Controls provide reasonable assurance that logical access to applications, data and computer resources is restricted to authorized and appropriate users to protect applications and network devices from unauthorized modification. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

1.5 Management performs semiannual user reviews on key applications and network devices to validate that user access is commensurate with the individual’s job function. If issues are identified, appropriate action is taken.

Inspected a network device semiannual access review to determine whether ViaWest management reviewed and approved the access to network devices and whether appropriate remediation, if required, was undertaken through inspection of subsequent access reports. Inspected a Cadence semiannual user review to determine whether management reviewed and approved access to Cadence and whether appropriate remediation, if required, was undertaken by management as a result of the review.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Complementary User Entity Controls

User entities are responsible for having appropriate logical security controls in place for user entity servers housed at ViaWest. User entities are responsible for maintaining their own firewall and network security controls.

Page 32: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

30

Physical Access

Control Objective #2: Controls provide reasonable assurance that physical access to ViaWest datacenters, system and network equipment is restricted to authorized personnel. Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

2.1 New or modified access to datacenters, raised floor areas and customer cages is approved by appropriate management personnel and designated customer personnel as appropriate.

Inspected new hire documentation for a sample of ViaWest new hire employees/contractors with physical access to datacenters, raised floor and customer cages to determine whether management completed and approved the Employee Physical Access Change Approval form. Inspected a sample of vendor accounts in the badging system to determine whether the vendor Single Point of Contact and management completed and approved the Vendor Access List form.

(A) For one out of eleven new employees and contractors inspected, physical access was granted to the Lone Mountain datacenter without formal documentation. Upon further investigation, EY determined that the user’s access was approved verbally for the grand opening of the Lone Mountain datacenter. ViaWest removed the user’s access during its semiannual user review. No deviations noted.

Page 33: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

31

Physical Access Control Objective #2: Controls provide reasonable assurance that physical access to ViaWest datacenters, system and network equipment is restricted to authorized personnel. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

2.1 (cont.)

Inspected a sample of customer accounts in the badging system to determine whether the selected customer badge appeared on the approved Cadence customer profile list.

No deviations noted.

Management Response

(A) Employee was qualified and authorized to have this access during the Lone Mountain open house to escort visitors and access was limited to this facility. A semiannual review after the completion of the open house ceremonies identified that the employee was not reset to initial access and corrected.   

Page 34: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

32

Physical Access Control Objective #2: Controls provide reasonable assurance that physical access to ViaWest datacenters, system and network equipment is restricted to authorized personnel. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

2.2 Terminated employees are communicated by the Human Resources Department to management via email notifications and/or the Cadence ticketing system. Upon termination notification, physical access to the datacenter is removed.

Inspected termination documentation for a sample of terminated employees to determine whether management removed the individual’s physical access from all datacenter locations upon termination.

No deviations noted.

2.3 Physical access to ViaWest datacenters for employees, vendors and customers is inspected by ViaWest management on a semiannual basis to confirm that access is authorized. Any issues noted are resolved by ViaWest management.

Inspected a semiannual physical access review performed by management to determine whether management completed and approved the review, and, for a sample of requested access changes, determined whether management-requested access changes were resolved through inspection of subsequent physical access reports.

No deviations noted.

2.4 Physical access mechanisms (e.g., access badge, biometric devices) have been implemented and are administered to help confirm that only authorized individuals have the ability to access the ViaWest datacenters.

For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed that the exterior doors of the datacenter required a badge for entry. For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed that in order to access the raised floor area or Network Operations Centers, either a PIN or biometric hand/finger scan was required before entry.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Page 35: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

33

Physical Access Control Objective #2: Controls provide reasonable assurance that physical access to ViaWest datacenters, system and network equipment is restricted to authorized personnel. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

2.5 Internal and external physical monitoring of datacenter activity is performed through the use of ViaWest Network Operations Center personnel, datacenter walk-throughs, alarms and security cameras.

For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed NOC staff monitoring the security cameras and alarm systems and performing periodic walk-throughs. For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed security cameras and other physical access monitoring tools throughout the facility. Inquired of management to determine whether NOC staff performed periodic walk-throughs of the datacenter facilities.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

2.6 Customer-specific areas (including cabinets, cages and suites) are secured with additional security mechanisms, such as combination locks, keys or biometric readers.

For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed that customer-specific areas were secured with combination locks, keys or biometric readers. For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed that keys and master keys were secured and inquired of management to determine whether master keys were secured.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

2.7 Each customer has a defined space within the datacenter that is physically secured within a locked cage, cabinet or suite.

For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed that customer equipment was secured in locked cages or cabinets, unless the customer was on site in his or her space.

No deviations noted.

Page 36: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

34

Physical Access Control Objective #2: Controls provide reasonable assurance that physical access to ViaWest datacenters, system and network equipment is restricted to authorized personnel. (continued) Complementary User Entity Controls

User entities should regularly review employees with physical access to ViaWest datacenters for appropriateness. Any changes to employees with privileged access should be communicated to ViaWest in a timely manner.

User entities are responsible for designating account administrators for the purpose of maintaining their authorized contact and physical access lists.

User entities are responsible for maintaining the ongoing validity of their authorized contacts through ViaWest’s customer support portal.

Page 37: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

35

Change Management

Control Objective #3: Controls provide reasonable assurance that network infrastructure is configured as authorized to (1) enable applications and application controls to operate effectively, and (2) protect data from unauthorized changes and provide for its availability for processing. Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

3.1 Non-routine modifications to network devices are made during maintenance windows authorized by management, and a back-out plan is documented for prior configuration recovery purposes and a method of procedure is documented.

Inspected a sample of network, datacenter and infrastructure changes within the Maintenance Window system to determine whether the change was approved by management, back-out procedures were documented, and a method of procedure was documented.

No deviations noted.

3.2 A test environment exists to test new network devices or network software before being implemented into production. Production devices cannot be accessed from the test environment.

Observed the existence of the test environment at the Cornell, Denver, Colorado, location and observed that no connection could be made to the ViaWest production network. Observed management attempt to connect to the internet and upstream devices from the test environment to determine whether access was appropriately restricted.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Page 38: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

36

Change Management Control Objective #3: Controls provide reasonable assurance that network infrastructure is configured as authorized to (1) enable applications and application controls to operate effectively, and (2) protect data from unauthorized changes and provide for its availability for processing. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

3.3 Network configuration changes are systematically logged within RANCID and are captured for review.

Inspected a sample change notification to determine whether RANCID automatically generated the notification and forwarded to management for review. Inquired of management to determine whether the daily emails were monitored and reviewed. Inspected a sample of network devices to determine whether the devices were configured within the RANCID system. Inspected the RANCID code base to determine whether it was configured to generate notifications for designated teams for review.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Complementary User Entity Controls

User entities are responsible for having controls in place to help ensure that changes to server operating systems, network operating systems, databases and application systems located on the user entity’s servers are appropriate.

User entities are responsible for confirming that service requests made to ViaWest are completed successfully and within an appropriate time frame.

Page 39: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

37

Monitoring and Incident Management

Control Objective #4: Controls provide reasonable assurance that deviations, problems and errors are identified, tracked, recorded and resolved in a complete, accurate and timely manner. Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

4.1 Network monitoring systems are used to monitor network events. These events are collected centrally and monitored by the Network Operations Center. Monitoring systems are redundant to provide failover capability.

Inquired of management to determine whether network monitoring tools were in place, redundant and automatically reported network incidents to management. Observed network monitoring tools to determine whether the tools were redundant and were monitoring network events. Inspected the network monitoring system configurations to determine whether the system was configured to monitor network devices.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

4.2 Cadence tickets for customer-impacting environmental, hardware and network changes and network disruptions are tracked, prioritized, escalated and assigned to resources based on documented policies and procedures. Customers are notified about unexpected events that may have an impact on their systems.

Inspected a sample of Cadence tickets to determine whether the events were tracked, prioritized, escalated and assigned to resources in accordance with documented policies and procedures and, if required, appropriate customer communications were documented. Inspected the application code for Cadence to determine whether Cadence created a ticket as priority 0 when a network monitoring system alarm was triggered by a device or network failure/issue.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Page 40: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

38

Monitoring and Incident Management Control Objective #4: Controls provide reasonable assurance that deviations, problems and errors are identified, tracked, recorded and resolved in a complete, accurate and timely manner. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

4.3 Each datacenter maintains redundant links to the internet and other ViaWest datacenters.

Inspected a sample of network devices and their supporting configurations and documentation to determine whether the device was configured for failover purposes. Inquired of management to determine whether each datacenter location had redundant links to the internet. Inspected datacenter network diagrams to determine whether redundant links were documented in the design.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

4.4 The network design supports redundancy for critical network components, and the design is documented on current network diagrams that are limited to appropriate personnel.

Inquired of management to determine whether network redundancy was in place for all critical systems. Inspected network device diagrams to determine whether redundant links were documented in the design. Inspected permitted access to the network diagrams on the network to determine whether access was restricted to appropriate personnel.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Page 41: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

39

Monitoring and Incident Management Control Objective #4: Controls provide reasonable assurance that deviations, problems and errors are identified, tracked, recorded and resolved in a complete, accurate and timely manner. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

4.5 Datacenters are monitored by Network Operations Center personnel who provide customer support, remote hands and monitoring of network events 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Inquired of management to determine whether each datacenter location was monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Inspected NOC personnel schedules to determine whether staff was scheduled to monitor each datacenter 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Observed monitoring systems in use at each datacenter to determine whether they were available in each NOC. Also observed NOC personnel monitoring the status of the backbone and network events.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

4.6 Management attends monthly meetings during which summaries and overviews of customer calls, service support and network availability reports are distributed to upper management and trends or potential issues are discussed.

Observed a monthly management meeting and noted that overviews and summaries of customer calls, service support and network availability metric reports were distributed to upper management and trends or potential issues were discussed. Inspected a sample of monthly reports to determine whether monthly management meetings were held and reports were distributed and discussed.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Page 42: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

40

Environmental Systems

Control Objective #5: Controls provide reasonable assurance that network devices and applications are protected against environmental threats and are backed up to permit restoration of network systems. Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

5.1 Each datacenter has implemented the following: HVAC cooling, power distribution units or remote power panels, uninterruptible power supply systems, generator(s) and raised floors.

For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed the existence of the HVAC systems, power distribution units or remote power panels, UPS systems, generator(s) and raised floors.

No deviations noted.

5.2 Environmental controls are monitored, and datacenter staff is alerted of any potential issues.

For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed NOC staff monitoring the datacenter environmental systems. For each of the in-scope datacenters, observed that monitoring systems were enabled on each of the critical support systems. Inspected monitoring system configurations to determine whether network staff was notified in the event of an incident.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

5.3 A test of the generator is performed by ViaWest staff on at least a monthly basis at each datacenter, and the results are logged and any issues are resolved.

Inquired of management to determine whether generator tests were performed monthly and whether issues were recorded and resolved. Inspected a sample of monthly generator reviews by datacenter to determine whether management performed the review and whether any issues identified were resolved.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Page 43: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

41

Environmental Systems Control Objective #5: Controls provide reasonable assurance that network devices and applications are protected against environmental threats and are backed up to permit restoration of network systems. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

5.4 ViaWest performs semiannual tests and maintenance for the UPS systems. Any issues identified during the semiannual visit are resolved.

Inquired of management to determine whether UPS tests and maintenance were performed semiannually and whether issues were recorded and resolved. Inspected a semiannual review of the UPS systems by datacenter to determine whether tests and maintenance were performed and whether management resolved identified issues.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

5.5 ViaWest performs annual checks and maintenance procedures to confirm that fire detection and suppression equipment is working properly at each datacenter.

Inquired of management to determine whether fire detection and suppression system tests and maintenance were performed annually and whether issues were recorded and resolved. Inspected the annual review of the fire detection and suppression equipment by datacenter to determine whether tests and maintenance were performed and whether management resolved identified issues.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

Page 44: Service Organization Control 1 Type II Reporteverythingcu.com/SSAE 16.01 2013 ViaWest Colocation System SOC 1 Final.pdfNevada; Austin, Texas; and Dallas, Texas, which may be relevant

42

Environmental Systems Control Objective #5: Controls provide reasonable assurance that network devices and applications are protected against environmental threats and are backed up to permit restoration of network systems. (continued) Controls Specified by ViaWest Testing Performed by EY Results of Tests

5.6 ViaWest performs tests and maintenance for the HVAC equipment at least quarterly. Any issues identified during the visits are resolved.

Inquired of management to determine whether HVAC tests and maintenance were performed quarterly and whether issues were recorded and resolved. Inspected a sample of quarterly HVAC tests and maintenance results by datacenter to determine whether maintenance was performed on the equipment and whether management resolved identified issues.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

5.7 ViaWest performs annual tests and maintenance for the Power Distribution Unit systems. Any issues identified during the annual visits are resolved.

Inquired of management to determine whether PDU tests and maintenance were performed annually and whether issues were recorded and resolved. Inspected the annual review of the PDU equipment by datacenter to determine whether tests and maintenance were performed and whether management resolved identified issues.

No deviations noted. No deviations noted.

5.8 Critical network device configurations are backed up using RANCID on a nightly basis.

Inspected a sample of backup logs to determine whether network devices were backed up per the RANCID backup schedule.

No deviations noted.