Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a...
Transcript of Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a...
![Page 1: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Kostantinos AMOLOCHITIS
Call coordinator REA.B5
Spreading excellence and widening participation, Science with and for Society
• Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020-two-stage (Stage-1)
• Vice-chair briefing for remote work
![Page 2: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1. VC role
2. Schedule
3. Quality Control
4. Cross-cutting issues
5. Evaluation criteria
6. SEP
Agenda
![Page 3: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1. Vice-chair role
• As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO
As part of report drafting phase:
− Provide feedback on 1st IER (approx. 3)
Use SEP comments (no task)
− Provide feedback on 1st CR (approx. 3)
Use SEP comments (no task)
− Provide feedback on draft CRs (approx. 6-7 for ‘consensus discussions’ you will moderate)
Use SEP comments (no task)
During Remote consensus discussion phase: − Moderate ‘consensus discussions’ (approx. 6-7) − Perform quality check of CR of ‘consensus discussions’ you moderate
(approx. 6-7) Task in SEP => Review CR
− Perform quality check of ESR of meetings you moderate (approx. 6) Task in SEP => Review ESR
PO will send names of experts for IER check & proposals for CR check
-> no task for IER check (as of 1.5 in SEP, use 'monitoring by expert' to find
proposals for your expert) -> for CR check (rapporteur should send
SEP notification when ready for QC)
![Page 4: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
12 - 13 May
Check on 1st IER
2. Schedule VCs
29 May – 01 June
Check on pre-drafted CR for ‘consensus discussions’ you will moderate (approx. 9)
Watch the web-briefings for VCs & experts & read 'Manual for Expert-evaluators' before starting
11 May 27 May
Check on 1st CR
22-23 June
QC Review CR
25-26 June
QC Review ESR
02 June -19 June remote consensus
![Page 5: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
14 May
Feedback on 1st IER from PO/VC (via SEP comments)
12 -13 May
1st IER ready for QC (submit)
11 May
Contract should be signed
Watch web-briefings & read 'Manual' before starting
'Accept to evaluate' or 'decline' all assigned proposals (approx. 6)
Milestone 24 May
100% IERs
submitted
Quality check by PO/ VC 1st IERs (completeness, consistency, length)
2 Schedule evaluators
![Page 6: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
28 May
100% CRs
drafted and
saved in SEP
2 Schedule rapporteurs
27 May
1st CR ready for QC by
PO/VC
29 May – 01 June 20 May
Watch web-briefings & read 'Manual' before starting
'Accept' or 'decline' assigned proposals (approx. 6)
Rapporteurs & PO/VC
Quality check by PO/ VC 1st CR (completeness, consistency, length)
Deadline all draft CRs are Quality checked by PO/ VC (CRs are ready for the remote consensus discussion)
![Page 7: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
CR discussion
24 - 25 June
100% 'Approve CR' submitted by
all actors
2 Schedule remote consensus
QC Approval
Remote consensus
- Discussion
starts Evaluators
+ Rapporteur + PO/VC
19 June
22 - 23 June
All CRs quality checked by PO/VC and ‘Review CR’ submitted in SEP
Evaluators, Rapporteurs & PO/VC
02 June
Discussion ends All evaluators should convey agreement on draft CR Rapporteur submits All ‘Write CR’ task
8 June
50% of write CRs agreed
and submitted
![Page 8: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3. Quality Control
• For which proposals will you do QC ?
− 1st IER of approx. 3 experts
− 1st CR of rapporteur (approx. 3)
− All pre-drafted CRs of ‘consensus discussions’ you will moderate (approx. 6-7)
− All CRs/ESRs of ‘consensus discussions’ you will moderate (same 6-7 as above)
• What to use for QC?
− WP topic description, topic briefing slides & assessment grid (and if needed proposal template)
• PO
− Will inform you via email which IERs/CRs you need to check
• How will you interact with expert?
− Evaluators submit IER. Rapporteurs keep report in draft
− Using SEP comments
− When you have finished your check, add final comment in SEP 'QC complete' and click
on option to 'notify expert'.
− If IER needs to be re-opened, please ask your PO to re-open IER
At IER stage, evaluator can add comments but cannot
send notifications. As VC, you can send
comments & notify expert.
![Page 9: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3. Quality Control
• QC for IER….
− Correct application of evaluation sub-criterion i.e. comments fit with
the sub-criterion text (see topic briefing slides used)
− Ensure statement for each element in assessment grid
− Coherence between comments and scores (ref. scoring scale, see topic
briefing slides)
− While some description can be included, it leads to a judgement
− OK to include details such as page numbers, WP numbers etc. -> can help
rapporteur to have a reference for checking context/factually correct
− Experts free to choose style
− No comments on language or spelling
− While not sent to applicants, it is crucial input for the next stage of
the evaluation i.e. pre-drafting CR
![Page 10: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
3. Quality Control
• QC for pre-drafted CR….
− Statements fit with sub-criterion
− Any cross-cutting issues addressed
− 'Points of discussion' clearly highlighted in paragraph under
corresponding sub-criterion i.e. ’no consensus based on 3 IERs’
− No contradictory statements or double penalisation
− No scores
− 'Semi-final' state to ensure an efficient remote consensus
discussion
![Page 11: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
4. Cross-cutting issues
• Applicants need to consider these elements in their proposals: − You should check how corresponding 'cross-cutting issue' is integrated in proposal and
consider this under the relevant sub-criterion indicated in topic briefing slides
A successful proposal is expected to address them, or convincingly explain why not relevant
Proposals addressing cross-cutting issues which are not explicitly mentioned in the scope of the topic can also be evaluated positively
− As stated in the general introduction of the WP, all SwafS topics are expected to support one or more of the Sustainable Development Goals
H2020 Cross-cutting issues integrated in SwafS WP
RRI Gender Open Science SSH
SwafS-01 SwafS-01 SwafS-24
![Page 12: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
4. Cross-cutting issues
• Responsible Research & Innovation (RRI) is cutting across Horizon 2020, many SwafS topics have a direct relation with RRI as a cross-cutting issue.
• RRI is an inclusive approach to R&I: it implies that societal actors work together to better align both the R&I process and its outcomes with the values, needs and expectations of society.
• In practice, under Horizon 2020, RRI is implemented as a package of actions across RRI dimensions:
RRI dimensions
Ethics and Research Integrity
Open Access
Public Engagement
Gender Science Education
Take into account the ethical dimension
Increase access to scientific results
Engage society more broadly
in its R&I activities
Take-up gender equality and gender dimension in the R&I process and content
Promote formal and informal
science education
For more info check the Manual for expert-
evaluators
![Page 13: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
4. Cross-cutting issues
• Gender: a topic is gender relevant when it's expected that findings affect women and men differently. Gender dimension should be considered in proposals e.g. including a gender analysis/specific studies.
Note that this is different from gender balance in teams &
management structures
For RIA , gender dimension now explicit in excellence, 4th sub-criterion
![Page 14: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
5. Evaluation criteria CSA
To the extent that the proposed work corresponds to the topic description in the work programme: • Clarity and pertinence of the objectives • Soundness of the concept, and credibility of the proposed methodology • Quality of the proposed coordination and/or support measures
Excellence
• The extent to which the outputs of the project would contribute to each of the expected impacts mentioned in the work programme under the relevant topic
Impact
SwafS-01
![Page 15: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
5. Evaluation criteria RIA
To the extent that the proposed work corresponds to the topic description in the work programme: • Clarity and pertinence of the objectives • Soundness of the concept, and credibility of the proposed methodology • Extent that proposed work is beyond the state of the art, and demonstrates innovation potential
(e.g. ground-breaking objectives, novel concepts and approaches, new products, services or business and organisational models)
• Appropriate consideration of interdisciplinary approaches and , where relevant, use of stakeholder knowledge and gender dimension in research and innovation content.
Excellence
• The extent to which the outputs of the project would contribute to each of the expected impacts
mentioned in the work programme under the relevant topic
Impact
SwafS-24
![Page 16: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
6. SEP step-by-step
1. Notification by email 2. Login
3. Retrieve proposal 4. Enter comments & 5. Notify expert
How to access SEP? (3 possibilities)
- From email notification,
OR
- Type 'SEP evaluation' in Internet explorer
OR
- Application link (see info box)
- Click =>
![Page 17: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
6. SEP: comments
• To add comments, click on 'expand comments'
• Click on 'start a new conversation' to launch a comment
• To comment directly on one of the criterion, click on the corresponding criterion Excellence, Impact etc.
• You can also respond directly to a comment by clicking on the arrow beside the user's name
• You should tick the box 'send also notifications' & tick name of expert for IER / tick 'rapporteur' for CR
Add comments Start a new conversation
1 28
![Page 18: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
References & contacts
• References
− Work Programme 2018-2020
− Topic briefing slides (& FAQs in annex) & assessment grid
− Manual for experts
− Proposal template
CSA
RIA
− SEP manual
• Contacts
Call Coordinator team: [email protected]
Project Officer (PO): [email protected] (SwafS-24)
[email protected] and [email protected]
(SwafS-01)
Read carefully topic description + introduction to WP
![Page 19: Science with and for Society (SwafS)-2020- two-stage (Stage-1) · 1. Vice-chair role • As a Vice-chair you carry out tasks similar to REA PO As part of report drafting phase: −Provide](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081613/5fbad9e1bf56f04865560fa3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Good luck!
Thank you for your attention