Frances VC Ryan

Supervisors: Professor Hazel Hall, Alistair Lawson, and Peter Cruickshank

f.ryan@napier.ac.uk | @cleverfrances | www.JustAPhD.com

Centre for Social Informatics

1

© Frances Ryan

“The role of online information in the building,

maintenance, and evaluation of personal reputation”

What’s the research about?

How online information contributes to the building, maintenance, and evaluation of personal reputations

― Personal reputation: Private individuals, rather than corporate identity and brand

Two broad research themes: (1) The means by which people evaluate or assess the personal reputations of others from the online evidence available to them

(2) How people manage their own personal reputations through their use of online information, and to what extent those behaviours are intentional

1 2

OK, but what does that mean?

© Red Rose Exile

© Frances Ryan

© Frances Ryan

1 2 3

© Frances Ryan

RQ2: How do individuals use online information to build and manage their

reputations?

RQ4: To what extent do individuals actively practise identity and reputation building and evaluation online?

RQ1:

How do individuals

build identities for

themselves online?

RQ3:

How do individuals

evaluate the identities and

reputations of others based

on the online information

available to them?

1 2 3 4

Where’s the literature found?

(Almost) Everywhere!

Information science Everyday life information seeking (ELIS) Citation analysis

Computing Employment research Human-computer interaction Human resources management Information systems Management and organisational studies Marketing Media and communication studies Physical and mental health

© Frances Ryan

1 2 3 4 5

How can I investigate both research themes?

The challenge? Establishing a way to examine both research themes simultaneously

Qualitative methods deemed most appropriate

Semi-structured, in-depth interviews to discuss participants’ own practices

Answering questions on evaluation of others proved more difficult

Several solutions were considered

1 2 3 4 5 6

Tradition in everyday life information seeking (ELIS) research

Rich data are reliable sources of information and eliminate the potential for inaccurate reporting

(Narayan, Case, & Edwards, 2011, p. 3)

Several studies use a combination of diary-keeping and interviews (Agosto & Hughes-Hassell, 2005; Dervin, 1983; McKenzie, 2003; Rieh, 2004)

Although studies vary, they share a common theme: combining the robustness of two forms of data

The solution? Diaries and interviews

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

How did the diary work?

Participants kept diary for one week

Simple instructions; no formatting guidelines

Got participants thinking about their information behaviours

Diaries helped form interview guides© Frances Ryan

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Collecting the data

Sample of 45 UK-based participants

Gen Y, Gen X, and Baby boomers

Short background survey

Diary for one week (electronic or hand-written)

One-hour semi-structured interviews (face-to-face or Skype)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Social media an extension of everyday lives

Varying levels self-censorship behaviours

Deleting posts

Intentional practices based on platform use

Managing “the blur”© Horatio3K

Generation X: Early findings

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Difficult to convey evaluations of others

Negative views when opinions are in stark contrast to their own

Conflicting views on anonymous accounts and pseudonyms used by others

More forgiving or lenient when known in an offline environment

Generation X: Early findings

© Martin Tews

© Sarah Reid

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Next steps

Complete data analysis

Determine thesis structure

Thesis write-up

Viva

The Doctor© Frances Ryan

© Frances Ryan

© BBC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Indicative bibliographyAusloos, J. (2012). The “Right to be forgotten”: Worth remembering? Computer Law & Security Review, 28(2), 143–152.

doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.006Bates, M. J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information

Science, 50(12), 1043–1050. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1043::AID-ASI1>3.3.CO;2-OCronin, B. & Askins, H.B. (2000). The web of knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield . Medford, NJ:

Information TodayDuguay, S. (2014). “He has a way gayer Facebook than I do”: Investigating sexual identity disclosure and context collapse

on a social networking site. New Media & Society, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1461444814549930Fieseler, C., Meckel, M., & Ranzini, G. (2014). Professional personae: How organizational identification shapes online

identity in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1–18. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12103Finocchiaro, G. & Ricci, A. (2013). Quality of information, the right to oblivion, and digital reputation. In B. Custers, T.

Calders, B. Schermer, & T. Zarsky (Eds.), Discrimination and Privacy in the Information Society (Vol. 3, pp. 289–299). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3

Greidanus, E. & Everall, R. D. (2010). Helper therapy in an online suicide prevention community. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 38(2), 191–204. doi:10.1080/03069881003600991

Howkins, J. (2009). Creative ecologies: Where thinking is a proper job. St Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press.

Kluemper, D. H. & Rosen, P. A. (2009). Future employment selection methods: Evaluating social networking web sites. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 567–580. doi:10.1108/02683940910974134

Lingel, J. & boyd, d. (2013). “Keep it secret, keep it safe”: Information poverty, information norms, and stigma. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 981–991. doi:10.1002/asi.22800

Madera, J. M. (2012). Using social networking websites as a selection tool: The role of selection process fairness and job pursuit intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1276–1282. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.03.008

Mesch, G. S. & Beker, G. (2010). Are norms of disclosure of online and offline personal information associated with the disclosure of personal information online? Human Communication Research, 36(4), 570–592. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01389.x

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Ollier-Malaterre, A., Rothbard, N. P., & Berg, J. M. (2013). When worlds collide in cyberspace: How boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 645–669. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0235

Savolainen, R. (2008). Everyday information practices: a social phenomenological perspective. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

Uski, S. & Lampinen, A. (2014). Social norms and self-presentation on social network sites: Profile work in action. New Media & Society, 1–18. doi:10.1177/1461444814543164

Vaast, E. (2007). Playing with masks: Fragmentation and continuity in the presentation of self in an occupational online forum. Information Technology & People, 20(4), 334–351. doi:10.1108/09593840710839789

Van Dijck, J. (2013). “You have one identity”: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture & Society, 35(2), 199–215. doi:10.1177/0163443712468605

Copyright attributionsSlide 10: Creative commons copyright Horatio3K (www.flickr.com/horatio3k)Slide 11: Creative commons copyright (1) Martin Tews (www.flickr.com/airpark); (2) Sarah Reid (www.flickr.com/sarahreido)Slide 12: Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation

All other images copyright Frances VC Ryan

Indicative bibliography (cont.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Slides available at: www.slideshare.net/justfrances

Thank you!

f.ryan@napier.ac.uk@cleverfrances

www.JustAPhD.com