PhD Student Conference

46
Christopher Parker The Joy Of Volunteered Information Christopher J. Parker

description

A brief overview of my PhD research into how amateur volunteered information can enhance the user experience of online geographic information.

Transcript of PhD Student Conference

Page 1: PhD Student Conference

Christopher ParkerThe Joy Of Volunteered Information

Christopher J. Parker

Page 2: PhD Student Conference

WWW.USERGENERATEDDESIGN.COM

Page 3: PhD Student Conference

WWW.MOBRO.CO/CHRIS210

Page 4: PhD Student Conference
Page 5: PhD Student Conference

Click icon to add picture

Page 6: PhD Student Conference
Page 7: PhD Student Conference
Page 8: PhD Student Conference

IntroductionWhat is VGI and PGI?

Page 9: PhD Student Conference
Page 10: PhD Student Conference
Page 11: PhD Student Conference
Page 12: PhD Student Conference
Page 13: PhD Student Conference
Page 14: PhD Student Conference
Page 15: PhD Student Conference

Study 1USER PERCEPTIONS OF VGI

• Papers • An Exploration of Volunteered Geographic Information, GISRUK 2010• Understanding the Volunteer in VGI, Slideshare• Characteristics of VGI Stakeholders, Online

Page 16: PhD Student Conference

Study 1Study Aims

• What are the different characteristics of the key users?

• Understand how different users perceive VGI, and the differences between them.

• What is the nature of VGI?

Page 17: PhD Student Conference

Consumers Professionals Special Interest Groups

Local Communities

Page 18: PhD Student Conference
Page 19: PhD Student Conference
Page 20: PhD Student Conference

Study 2• Papers

• The Role Of VGI And PGI In Outdoor Activities, Applied Ergonomics• Advantages Of VGI From A Human Factors Perspective, Transactions in GIS• Relevance of Volunteered Geographic Information In A Real World Context, GISRUK 2011

THE ROLE OF VGI AND PGI IN OUTDOOR ACTIVIIES

Page 21: PhD Student Conference

Study 2Study Aims

• How VGI and PGI offer different benefits to the end user in a real world scenario

• The strengths and weaknesses of VGI and PGI relative to how they meet the information requirements of the user’s tasks and activities

• How VGI and PGI may be effectively integrated to produce highly usable and effective applications.

Page 22: PhD Student Conference

Study 2Participants

• Need to critically evaluate information

• Can be bounded in as a simple user group

• Make use of PGI as well as generating and utilising VGI

• Allow for scalable, in depth investigation

• Be fun to talk about at presentations

Page 23: PhD Student Conference

Study 2Methodology

• Multi Methods [qualitative]• Focus Groups• Participatory Observation• Diary Studies

• Non-Probability Sampling• 2 years experience• Familiar with trip planning• User of VGI and PGI

• Number• 32 kayakers [focus groups]• 100 + participants [observations]• 4 diaries on 2 trips

Page 24: PhD Student Conference
Page 25: PhD Student Conference

Click icon to add picture

10/04/2023

Page 26: PhD Student Conference
Page 27: PhD Student Conference
Page 28: PhD Student Conference

Study 3 & 4THE IMPACT OF VGI ON USER JUDGEMENT

Page 29: PhD Student Conference

Study 3 & 4Study Aims

• How VGI and PGI offer different benefits to the end user in a real world scenario

• The strengths and weaknesses of VGI and PGI relative to how they meet the information requirements of the user’s tasks and activities

• How VGI and PGI may be effectively integrated to produce highly usable and effective applications.

Page 30: PhD Student Conference

Study 3 & 4Participants

• Need to critically evaluate information

• Can be bounded in as a simple user group

• Make use of PGI as well as generating and utilising VGI

• Critically assess information for risk management

Page 31: PhD Student Conference

Study 3 & 4Methodology

• Study 3• Observation

• VGI: Generate Data Set• Literature Review

• PGI: Pool data

• Study 4• Mono Methods• Experimental• Online• Altering data gathered to influence user

Page 32: PhD Student Conference

10/04/2023

Page 33: PhD Student Conference
Page 34: PhD Student Conference

  Information In Map

PGI PGI + VGI

Participant Told What

Map Contained

PGI Group 1 Group 2

PGI + VGI Group 3 Group 4

Page 35: PhD Student Conference
Page 36: PhD Student Conference
Page 37: PhD Student Conference

Quality Authority Usability

Good Trustworthy Usefulness

Accurate Credible Clear

Current Reliable Efficient

Useful Official Satisfaction

Important Authority

Page 38: PhD Student Conference
Page 39: PhD Student Conference

Quality Authority Usability (1)

Good Trustworthy Usefulness

Accurate Credible Clear (2)

Current Reliable Efficient

Useful Official Satisfaction (3)

Important Authority

Page 40: PhD Student Conference

Quality Authority Usability (1)

Good Trustworthy Usefulness

Accurate Credible Clear (2)

Current (4) Reliable Efficient

Useful Official Satisfaction (3)

Important Authority

Page 41: PhD Student Conference

Fig 1. Fig 2.

Fig 3. Fig 4.

Page 42: PhD Student Conference

Study 3 & 4Key Outcome

• Impact of Data Provided• Enhanced Usability in clarity and satisfaction• Including VGI doesn’t increase perceptions

of authority or quality

• Impact of ‘placebo’• Enhanced perceptions of currency• Knowing its VGI doesn’t make it more or less

authoritative or usable

Page 43: PhD Student Conference

Finishing Points?

Page 44: PhD Student Conference

Finishing PointsKey Outcome

• All user groups perceive VGI differently• Understand the user, no universals

• VGI and PGI are just information• Not the magic early literature talked about

• The greatest potential to influence the user experience is during planning

• We should question the hype around mobile communication devices

Page 45: PhD Student Conference

Finishing PointsKey Outcome

• More descriptive compared to PGI’s objective• Helps provide an additional perspective not

offered traditionally

• In consumers• The perception of VGI had little impact on

assessment of information• But the content of VGI is unique and helps

increase the usability of the mashup

Page 46: PhD Student Conference