Schäfer, N., Maierhofer, T., Herrmann, J., Jørgensen, M. E ... fileSchäfer et al. 1 1 A tandem...
Transcript of Schäfer, N., Maierhofer, T., Herrmann, J., Jørgensen, M. E ... fileSchäfer et al. 1 1 A tandem...
Schäfer, N., Maierhofer, T., Herrmann, J., Jørgensen, M. E., Lind, C., vonMeyer, K., ... Hedrich, R. (2018). A Tandem Amino Acid Residue Motif inGuard Cell SLAC1 Anion Channel of Grasses Allows for the Control ofStomatal Aperture by Nitrate. Current Biology, 28(9), 1370-1379.e5.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.027
Peer reviewed version
License (if available):CC BY-NC-ND
Link to published version (if available):10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.027
Link to publication record in Explore Bristol ResearchPDF-document
This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available onlinevia Elsevier at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.027. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
University of Bristol - Explore Bristol ResearchGeneral rights
This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the publishedversion using the reference above. Full terms of use are available:http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms
Schäfer et al.
1
A tandem amino acid residue motif in guard cell SLAC1 anion channel of grasses allows 1
for the control of stomatal aperture by nitrate 2
3
Nadine Schäfer1†, Tobias Maierhofer1†, Johannes Herrmann1†, Morten Egevang Jørgensen1, 4
Christof Lind1, Katharina von Meyer1, Silke Lautner2, Jörg Fromm2, Marius Felder3, Alistair 5
M. Hetherington4*, Peter Ache1, Dietmar Geiger1*, Rainer Hedrich1* 6
7
1 Institute for Molecular Plant Physiology and Biophysics, Julius-von-Sachs-Institute, 8
Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Julius-von-Sachs Platz 2, D-97082 Wuerzburg, Germany 9
2 Department of Wood Science, University Hamburg, Leuschnerstr. 91d, D-21031 Hamburg, 10
Germany 11
3 Plant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, D-12
85764 Neuherberg, Germany 13
4 School of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall 14
Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK. 15
† These authors contributed equally. 16
*To whom correspondence should be addressed: 17
Rainer Hedrich, Email: [email protected], Tel.: +49 (0)931 318 6100 18
Alistair Hetherington, Email: [email protected], Tel.: +44 (0) 117 39 41188 19
and Dietmar Geiger (Lead Contact), Email: [email protected], Tel.: +49 20
(0)931 318 6105 21
Field Code Changed
Field Code Changed
Schäfer et al.
2
Abstract 22
The latest major group of plants to evolve were the grasses. These became important in the mid-23
Paleogene about 40 million years ago. During evolution leaf CO2 uptake and transpirational 24
water loss were optimized by the acquisition of grass specific stomatal complexes. In contrast 25
to the kidney-shaped guard cells (GCs) typical of the dicots such as Arabidopsis, in the grasses 26
and agronomically important cereals, the guard cells are dumbbell-shaped and are associated 27
with morphologically distinct subsidiary cells (SCs). We studied the molecular basis of guard 28
cell action in the major cereal crop barley. Upon feeding ABA to xylem sap of an intact barley 29
leaf, stomata closed in a nitrate dependent manner. This process was initiated by activation of 30
guard cell SLAC-type anion channel currents. HvSLAC1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes gave 31
rise to S-type anion currents that increased several fold upon stimulation with >3 mM nitrate. 32
We identified a tandem amino acid residue motif that within the SLAC1 channels differs 33
fundamentally between monocots and dicots. When the motif of nitrate-insensitive dicot 34
Arabidopsis SLAC1 was replaced by the monocot signature, AtSLAC1 converted into a grass-35
type like nitrate-sensitive channel. Our work reveals a fundamental difference between monocot 36
and dicot guard cells and prompts questions into the selective pressures during evolution that 37
resulted in fundamental changes in the regulation of SLAC1 function. 38
Schäfer et al.
3
Introduction 39
Guard cell pairs that drive stomatal movement control leaf CO2 uptake and concomitant 40
transpirational water loss. To survive episodes of drought and excessive heat, stomata have to 41
sense sudden changes in environmental conditions and adjust stomatal aperture accordingly. 42
Based largely on work in the model dicot Arabidopsis much is known about the molecular 43
details that underlie stomatal function [1-3]. By way of contrast, in the grasses that are by far 44
the world's most important sources of food, it is surprising that our molecular knowledge 45
concerning guard cell function is still very limited [4-8] (and references therein). 46
In contrast to the kidney-shaped guard cells typical of the dicots, grass stomata come as pairs 47
of dumbbell-shaped guard cells (GCs) in physical contact with a lateral pair of subsidiary cells 48
(SCs, [4]). In terms of function there Raschke and Fellows (1971, [9]) found that during 49
stomatal opening in maize K+ and anions are shuttled from SCs to GCs and when closing they 50
move in the opposite direction. Guard cells of dicots and monocots respond to the plant 51
hormone ABA, that binds to its cytosolic PYR/PYL/RCAR type receptor [10, 11]. The ABA 52
receptor forms a complex with the PP2C phosphatase ABI1 and SnRK2 kinase OST1 [12]. 53
Binding of ABA to the receptor ABA cause inactivation of ABI1, and release of OST1 from 54
inhibition of the PP2C phosphatase [13]. In turn, the OST1 kinase phosphorylates the guard cell 55
anion channel SLAC1, causing it to open [14, 15]. The resulting release of anions depolarizes 56
the plasma membrane and the change in voltage activates the GORK1 channel resulting in K+ 57
efflux, which is followed by the loss of water and resulting stomatal closure [1, 16]. 58
Potassium and chloride represent the dominant ions in dicot and monocot guard cells. In the 59
dicot model plant Arabidopsis, the SLAC1 channel is permeable to chloride. When expressed 60
in the heterologous expression system of Xenopus oocytes, Arabidopsis SLAC1 is active in 61
chloride-based media [14]. In contrast to SLAC1, its homologs SLAH2 and 3 require nitrate at 62
the external mouth of the anion channel to gate open in oocyte and guard cell systems [17, 18]. 63
In order to gain insights into how cereal guard cells function, we analysed the transcript profile 64
of barley guard cells and subsidiary cells. We identified HvSLAC1 together with the major 65
components of guard cell ABA signalling. Strikingly, in barley SLAC1 and in marked contrast 66
to Arabidopsis SLAC1, we identified a distinct tandem amino acid motif, responsible for nitrate 67
activation. 68
Schäfer et al.
4
Results 69
ABA-dependent stomatal closure in barley requires extracellular nitrate 70
Surprisingly, studies aimed at understanding the molecular basis of stomatal movements in 71
barley, a major cereal grass crop, are somewhat limited [4, 5]. To address this issue, we first 72
investigated stomatal function in the intact barley leaf using IRGA-based measurements of 73
stomatal conductance. We focussed on Hordeum vulgare line Barke, because genome 74
information is available, and it represents one of the most popular brewing barley varieties 75
worldwide. 76
From work in Arabidopsis it is known that ABA triggers stomatal closure following binding to 77
cytosolic receptors of the PYR/PYL-family and the subsequent induction of a signalling 78
pathway that ultimately activates SLAC/SLAH anion channels [14, 15, 17, 19, 20]. To 79
investigate the response of barley stomata to ABA, we fed 25µM ABA (a concentration 80
sufficient to close barley stomata [5]) via the leaf petiole. When the petiole was supplied with 81
ABA in water stomatal closure was delayed and incomplete (figure 1A). This is in marked 82
contrast to the prompt closure observed in the dicot Arabidopsis [21], but is similar to the 83
response observed in the monocot date palm [21]. However, the most striking result to emerge 84
from this experiment was that timely and significant ABA-induced stomatal closure could be 85
elicited by the addition of nitrate (5 mM KNO3-) to the feeding medium (figure 1B). This results 86
clearly shows that in barley the full stomatal response to ABA requires the presence of nitrate. 87
88
Stomatal closure in barley involves inverse fluxes of K+ and Cl- between guard and 89
subsidiary cells 90
Having identified a requirement for nitrate in ABA-induced closure we next investigated the 91
requirement for K+ and Cl-. Given that early studies in maize provided initial evidence for K+ 92
and chloride shuttling between guard cells and subsidiary cells [9, 22], we used EDX analysis 93
to determine the content of these elements in guard and subsidiary cells. Figure 1C shows that 94
guard cells (GC) from closed stomata contained less K and Cl than open ones. Subsidiary cells 95
(SC), however, exhibited the inverse relationship with relatively higher levels of K and Cl 96
associated with closed stomata (figure 1C). These data confirm older work in maize [9, 22] but 97
leave open the question of why there is a requirement for nitrate for the closure of barley 98
stomata. In summary, in barley just as in Arabidopsis, K+ and Cl- represent major ionic 99
components of the guard cell osmotic motor that drives stomatal movement. The fact that the 100
Schäfer et al.
5
changes in K+ are larger than those of Cl-, indicate that besides Cl-, additional anions such as 101
nitrate or malate must be involved. In this context, it should be mentioned that in barley 102
epidermal cells Cl- and NO3- might provide the total negative solute charge [23]. 103
104
Using transcriptomics to investigate ABA-induced stomatal closure in barley 105
To investigate the molecular machinery responsible for bringing about stomatal closure in 106
barley and in particular the ion fluxes between guard and subsidiary cells, we employed a 107
transcriptomic approach. We isolated three experimental preparations; 1) intact leaves (L); 2) 108
lower epidermis with intact stomatal complexes (GCSC) and 3) leaves without upper and lower 109
epidermis und thus without guard cell complexes (LwoGC). We employed a bioinformatic 110
approach to identify differentially expressed genes (DEG) in guard cell complexes (for full 111
DEG list see table S1). Because guard cells, in contrast to mesophyll cells, contain a reduced 112
number of chloroplasts and epidermal pavement cells have no chloroplasts, we initially 113
compared photosynthesis (PS) related transcripts. As expected, we found genes associated with 114
PS electron transport and CO2 fixation underrepresented in the GCSC samples (table S1, filtered 115
by MapMan category 1). When analysing RNA-seq data, it did not come as a surprise that we 116
found DEGs related to guard cell function- and ABA signalling. 117
We next investigated genes involved in ion transport. In the ion channel fraction guard cell-118
specific anion channels of the SLAC/SLAH type and Shaker-like potassium channels of the 119
KAT- and GORK/SKOR-type were identified (table S2). This expression pattern underpins the 120
notion that the grass type stomata from barley harbour the guard cell major H+, K+ and Cl- 121
transporting entities represented by AHA1 and KAT1 for stomatal opening [24] and SLAC1 and 122
GORK for closure ([1] for review). Among the ABA dependent transcripts, pronounced guard 123
cell expression of orthologues to the PYR/PYL ABA receptor family, PP2C phosphatases ABI1 124
and 2, SnRK2 kinases of the OST1-type were found. Based on 5 HvOST1-like sequences, we 125
generated a phylogenetic tree and identified HvOST1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 most closely related to the 126
Arabidopsis OST1 (figure S1A). 127
To validate expression of the guard cell ion channels and components of the ABA signalling 128
pathway suggested by the RNA-seq data, we performed qPCR analysis. We sampled leaves (L) 129
and epidermal peels containing both guard cells and subsidiary cells (GCSC) and preparations 130
in which the subsidiary cells were selectively disrupted using the blender method [25]. The 131
latter preparation represented a fraction highly enriched in guard cells (GC) (figure S1B). As in 132
Arabidopsis guard cell databases obtained using a related experimental approach [25], we found 133
Schäfer et al.
6
transcripts of ABI1, SLAC1 and OST1.1 expressed in an almost guard cell specific manner. In 134
contrast, OST1.3 expression was found distributed equally among samples. Among the guard 135
cell expressed SnRK2 genes, HvOST1.1 shows the closest phylogenetic relationship to the 136
Arabidopsis OST1 kinase with 80.5% identical residues (figure S1A). The HvOST1.1 sequence 137
harbours all known functional domains of OST1-like, ABA-dependent SnRK2 kinases, 138
including the DI domain/SnRK2 box and the DII domain/ABA-Box [12, 26-28]. On these 139
grounds HvOST1.1 very likely represents the SLAC1 activating ABA kinase in barley. In 140
Arabidopsis GCs SLAH3 operates a nitrate activated anion channel conducting nitrate and 141
chloride [17]. In barley, however, SLAH3.1 was found expressed in leaves, but not in the GCSC 142
and GC samples (figure S1B). 143
144
Barley HvSLAC1 is under the control of nitrate and OST1 /ABI1 pair 145
McAdam et al., 2016 [29] and Lind et al., 2015 [30] showed that SnRK2 kinases (OST1s) are 146
strictly conserved during evolution. All OST1 kinases derived from different evolutionary 147
distinct plant species so far tested are capable of activating Arabidopsis SLAC1. In addition, 148
AtOST1 is capable of activating SLAC1 isoforms from other monocot species, such as 149
PdSLAC1 from date palm [21] or OsSLAC1 from rice [8]. Thus, to understand the molecular 150
basis of nitrate dependency of stomatal closure in barley, we expressed HvSLAC1 alone and 151
together with AtOST1 in Xenopus oocytes and studied its anion channel properties. In the 152
absence of the SnRK2 kinase no currents were recorded and even in the presence of the ABA-153
induced kinase AtOST1 and 30 mM chloride-based extracellular media, macroscopic S-type 154
anion currents could only be recorded at strongly depolarized membrane potentials (figure 2A). 155
Upon addition of 30 mM nitrate, however, pronounced S-type anion currents were observed 156
(figure 2A). While the Arabidopsis OST1 WT kinase was capable of activating HvSLAC1 in 157
nitrate-based solutions, the kinase dead mutant AtOST1 D140A could not perform this function 158
(figure 2B and C). This indicates that phosphorylation of HvSLAC1 is strictly required for 159
anion channel activation (cf. [14]). Besides the calcium independent SLAC1 kinase OST1, 160
calcium dependent kinases of the CPK and CIPK/CBL type can phosphorylate and gate open 161
AtSLAC1 ([31]). As a representative of the latter kinases category, we selected CPK6 for 162
oocyte co-expression experiments with HvSLAC1. As with OST1, CKP6 activated the barely 163
S-type channel to the same extent as AtSLAC1 (figure 2A; figure S2A; [19, 32]). 164
In contrast to the grass SLAC1, Arabidopsis SLAC1 does not require the presence of 165
extracellular nitrate for activation (figure S2A, c.f. [18]). Interestingly, the ABA phosphatase 166
Schäfer et al.
7
ABI1 in Arabidopsis guard cell inhibits the response to nitrate [33] and negatively regulates 167
AtOST1 and AtSLAC1 activity [14, 15, 19, 31]. Upon co-expression of HvSLAC1 and AtOST1 168
with ABI1, we found that HvSLAC1-mediated anion currents were strongly reduced (figure 2B 169
and C). These findings indicate that fast ABA signalling is conserved between guard cells of 170
the dicot Arabidopsis and monocot grass Hordeum vulgare. 171
The Arabidopsis AtSLAC1 does not require extracellular nitrate for activation (figure S2A) but 172
has a strong permeably preference for nitrate over chloride [14]. The HvSLAC1 PNO3/PCl 173
calculated permeability ratio of 6.4 ± 0.8 indicates that the dicot and monocot guard cell anion 174
channel would preferentially conduct nitrate when present in guard cells at osmotically relevant 175
quantities (figure S2B). Is the nitrate sensitivity a unique feature of HvSLAC1 or is it found in 176
other cereals, too? To answer this question we expressed rice SLAC1 (OsSLAC1) in oocytes 177
(cf. [8]). The results in figure S2A and C show that the rice S-type anion channel shared its 178
selectivity and nitrate dependent features with the Hordeum SLAC1 anion channel. In this 179
context, it should be noted that we recently showed, in the monocot Phoenix dactylifera (date 180
palm), that PdSLAC1 is also nitrate activated [21]. Besides nitrate, other physiological relevant 181
anions such as phosphate, sulphate, malate or chloride were not capable of activating 182
HvSLAC1-derived anion currents (figure S2D) or to shift its rel. PO to negative (physiological) 183
membrane potentials (figure S2E). 184
To find out whether nitrate activation is a property of monocot SLAC1, we compared the 185
Brassicaceaen AtSLAC1 with a dicot orthologue from tomato and tobacco - two Solanaceae 186
crop species. These dicot SLAC1s behave more similarly to the nitrate insensitive AtSLAC1 187
than to nitrate-activated monocot SLAC1s (figure 2D). 188
189
Extracellular nitrate primes HvSLAC1 to release chloride 190
To study the biophysical properties of nitrate-activated HvSLAC1 in more detail we co-191
expressed the anion channel with AtCPK6 [2, 19, 32] and determined current densities and the 192
relative open probability as a function of the external nitrate concentration (figure 3A and B). 193
When exposed to increasing external nitrate concentrations, the peak efflux currents and the 194
relative open probability shifted towards negative membrane potentials and thereby increased 195
the plasma membrane anion conductance (figure 3A and B). In contrast, similar experiments 196
with increasing external chloride applications revealed that in the physiological membrane 197
potential range (negative from -100 mV), anion release currents are absent irrespective of the 198
external Cl- concentration (figure 3C and D). While 100 mM nitrate shifted the HvSLAC1 half-199
Schäfer et al.
8
maximal open probability (V1/2) to -120 mV (figure 3B), V1/2 in 100 mM chloride remained at 200
depolarized membrane potentials of -20 mV (figure 3D). When plotting V1/2 as a function of 201
the external nitrate concentration, the resulting saturation curve could be described with a 202
Michaelis-Menten equation (figure 3E) resulting in a K0.5 value of 10.9 ± 3.8 mM nitrate. Thus 203
physiological [NO3−] concentration of 10 to 70 mM found in the xylem sap of barley leaves 204
[34, 35] will activate HvSLAC1 anion channel. This set of experiments shows not only that 205
HvSLAC1 conducts nitrate (figure 3A and B, figure S2B) but also that nitrate is required to 206
gate the barley guard cell channel open. 207
Nitrate-dependent gating is a known feature of SLAH2 and SLAH3 branch of the Arabidopsis 208
SLAC/SLAH anion channel family, but not of its founding member AtSLAC1 (see above and 209
c.f. [17, 18]; figure S2A). While AtSLAH2 is strictly nitrate selective, AtSLAH3 also conducts 210
chloride when primed with extracellular nitrate [17, 18]. To further examine the nature of the 211
nitrate dependency of HvSLAC1 and to substantiate that HvSLAC1 conducts chloride in the 212
presence of its gating ligand nitrate, the anion channel was challenged by different chloride to 213
nitrate ratios. Anion currents recorded in the presence of 3 mM extracellular chloride were very 214
weak and reversed at +50 mV (figure 3F). In contrast, addition of 3 mM nitrate enhanced the 215
steady state currents and shifted the reversal potential to 0 mV (figure 3F). When the chloride 216
concentration was further increased to 100 mM in the presence of 3 mM nitrate, the reversal 217
potential of HvSLAC1-mediated anion currents shifted to more negative membrane potentials 218
without anion release currents and relative open probability being influenced by chloride (figure 219
3F and G). To further investigate the chloride conductance of HvSLAC1 when primed with 220
extracellular nitrate, we monitored the reversal potential of HvSLAC1 AtCPK6 expressing 221
oocytes. Upon addition of 3 mM nitrate to a 3 mM chloride containing bath solution, the 222
reversal potential dropped by 56 mV and shifted to even more negative membrane potentials 223
when the chloride concentration was increased to 100 mM (figure S2F and G). This behaviour 224
and those to varying Cl- to NO3- rations (figure 3F and G) indicate that HvSLAC1, when pre-225
activated by nitrate, conducts both nitrate and chloride. In contrast to the nitrate sensitive 226
monocot S-type anion channels, AtSLAC1 reversal potential shifts appeared less nitrate- but 227
more chloride sensitive (figure S2F and G). In contrast to AtSLAC1, OsSLAC1 and HvSLAC1, 228
the reversal potential of the nitrate-selective AtSLAH2 was sensitive to nitrate only but not 229
chloride (figure S2F and G). Taken together, the electrical properties of the monocot anion 230
channels are reminiscent of the nitrate-gated, chloride and nitrate permeable AtSLAH3 anion 231
channel rather than of the nitrate-independent dicot AtSLAC1. 232
Schäfer et al.
9
233
SLAC1 grass type tandem amino acid motif on TMD3 is key for nitrate priming 234
3D homology modelling of AtSLAC1 and AtSLAH2 to the crystal structure obtained with the 235
bacterial homologue HiTehA in combination with site-directed mutagenesis showed associated 236
residues of Trans-Membrane Domain TMD3 as part of the pore forming entity [18, 36]. To find 237
the nitrate site in barley SLAC1, we compared TMD3 of monocot and dicot SLAC1 type 238
channels (figure 4A, figure S3). Monocot and dicot SLAC1s could be well distinguished by 239
two residues close to Val272 and Val273 of AtSLAC1. We found dicot SLAC1s to either carry 240
two valine residues such as AtSLAC1 (V272 and V273) or an IV pair in Solanaceaen species. 241
Monocots including barley HvSLAC1 and date palm PdSLAC1 at the related positions harbour 242
an isoleucine and alanine side chain (figure 4A, Fig S3) similar to the nitrate activated SLAH2/3 243
anion channels that possess either the IA or an IS motif (figure S3). Given that the amino acid 244
sequence on TMD3 clearly distinguishes monocot from dicot SLACs, these residues seem to 245
represent a specific signature. Thus, we tested whether this TMD3 tandem motif between both 246
monocot and dicot representative SLACs is essential for nitrate dependency. Therefore, we 247
replaced just the VV motif in AtSLAC1 by IA and the IA motif in Hv/PdSLAC1 by the dicot 248
VV motif. The resulting Arabidopsis mutant AtSLAC1 V272I V273A displayed nitrate-249
induced anion currents just like HvSLAC1 and PdSLAC1 WT (figure 4B). Note, this behaviour 250
appeared only in 30 % of the tested oocyte batches (this conditional phenotype is shown in 251
figure 4B) whereas the remaining oocyte batches revealed a AtSLAC1 WT behaviour. Thus, 252
the introduction of the monocot IA motif in TMD3 of AtSLAC1 is essential and sufficient to 253
provide for the nitrate dependency. However, when the monocot SLACs were equipped with 254
the dicot VV signature the resulting mutants with barley (HvSLAC1 I286V A287V) and date 255
palm anion channel (PdSLAC1 I285V A286V), appeared severely impaired even in nitrate-256
based buffers (figure 4B) indicating that in monocots additional structural moieties shape the 257
permeation pathway. The fact that the HvSLAC1 I286V A287V and the PdSLAC1 I285V 258
A286V mutant did not carry macroscopic anion currents and that AtSLAC1 V272I V273A 259
displayed a conditional phenotype only, indicates that we have identified a critical position 260
within the selectivity filter in the anion channels’ pore that might result in a meta-stable 261
structure in the mutant AtSLAC1 V272I V273A. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that for proper 262
anion discrimination additional residues are involved. 263
To find a molecular explanation to this discrepancy in monocot-dicot pore residue exchange, 264
we thus asked which channel sites co-evolved with the TMD3 signature. Using a bioinformatics 265
Schäfer et al.
10
co-evolution pipeline (www.evfold.org), we identified residues in AtSLAC1 that co-evolved 266
with the signature motif. Interestingly, the 50 highest scoring hits of co-evolved residues were 267
found exclusively on TMD1 to 3 but not on other parts of the SLAC1 protein (figure 4C, Table 268
S3). To test whether TMD1 to 3 including the remarkable difference in TMD3 between 269
monocot and dicot SLAC1 representatives is essential and sufficient to provide for the monocot 270
nitrate dependency and dicot nitrate independency, we exchanged either only TMD1 and 2 or 271
TMD1, 2 and 3 between AtSLAC1 and HvSLAC1. The resulting chimeras were named 272
AtSLAC1(HvTMD1-2) where AtSLAC1 carries TMD1 and 2 from HvSLAC1, 273
AtSLAC1(HvTMD1-3) where AtSLAC1 carries TMD1-3 from HvSLAC1 and vice versa. 274
When comparing WT SLAC1 channels with the chimeras where only TMD1 and 2 was 275
replaced, we could not document any change in their chord conductance (figure 4D). Only when 276
TMDs 1-3 were exchanged, the nitrate-dependency of HvSLAC1 could be transferred to 277
AtSLAC1 while HvSLAC1 lost its nitrate-dependency when equipped with TMD1-3 of 278
AtSLAC1 (figure 4D). The comparison of rel. open probabilities between AtSLAC1 WT and 279
AtSLAC1(HvTMD1-3) demonstrates that the activation of the chimera is based on a nitrate-280
dependent shift of its rel. PO to negative membrane potentials just like with monocot HvSLAC1 281
WT (figure 4E and F). On the contrary, the chimera HvSLAC1(AtTMD1-3) appeared open 282
even in the absence of nitrate, just like dicot AtSLAC1 WT (figure 4E and F). Thus, the TMD3 283
IA signature from monocots is required and sufficient to convert the dicot SLAC1 from 284
Arabidopsis into a nitrate-gated monocot grass SLAC1 anion channel (figure 4B). In contrast, 285
monocot SLAC1s require the VV motif and in addition backbone residues situated on TMD1 286
and 2 to be converted in a nitrate-insensitive anion channel (figure 4D to F). 287
Schäfer et al.
11
Discussion 288
One of the most striking results to emerge from the experiments described in this paper is that 289
the rates of stomatal opening and closure in barley are much faster than in Arabidopsis (cf. 290
[37]). In the absence of other compensatory factors this is likely to confer a selective advantage 291
on barely in comparison with Arabidopsis. The ability to rapidly adjust stomatal aperture to suit 292
the prevailing environmental conditions is likely to allow barley enhanced control over 293
transpiration, xylem-based nutrient delivery, and photosynthesis that will likely play out in 294
terms of increased competitiveness ([4, 38], and refs. therein). 295
In seeking a mechanistic explanation for the ability of barley stomata to open and close rapidly 296
we focussed first on the flux of the major osmotically active cations and anions. Our results 297
suggest that barley has evolved a stomatal system in which the guard and subsidiary cells 298
behave as a functional unit [4, 37]. For example, during closure while there is loss of K+, Cl- 299
(figure 1C) and very likely NO3- too from the guard cell, it accumulates in the subsidiary cells. 300
In this sense, the subsidiary cells have evolved to play a role as reservoirs or cisterns of 301
osmotically active ions. In grasses stomata move faster than those of dicots because guard cells 302
and subsidiary cells actively regulate turgor and volume in an inverse manner [4, 9]. This way 303
subsidiary cells operate as a source of osmotica that is used by guard cells when they swell, and 304
the stomatal pore opens (figure 1C). 305
A comparative transcriptomic approach of ABA signalling in the cells of the barley stomatal 306
complex revealed the presence of components that were well known from investigations of 307
Arabidopsis guard cells (table S2). These data suggested that, in addition to the evolution of 308
functionally linked and morphologically distinct guard and subsidiary cells, we should look for 309
augmentation of known players in addition to novel elements to explain the rapid movements 310
in barley stomata. 311
312
A tandem amino acid signature in monocot SLAC1 anion channels provide for nitrate 313
dependent gating 314
Here we focussed on the barley SLAC1 anion channel. The regulation of this channel by ABI1 315
and OST1 appeared to be highly conserved between Arabidopsis and barley (figure 2B and C, 316
[14, 15]). The most striking feature to emerge was that gating of the barley guard cell anion 317
channel is controlled by ABA signalling and nitrate (figure 2 and 3). Using a structural biology 318
approach coupled with site-directed mutagenesis, we identified the key residues located in 319
Schäfer et al.
12
TMD3 that are responsible for nitrate gating (figure 4). Interestingly, structure-function 320
investigations with AtSLAH2 also identified Serine 228 (equivalent to V273 in AtSLAC1) in 321
TMD3 as the key residue for the strict nitrate selectivity of the root anion channel [18]. Monocot 322
SLACs could only be converted to nitrate independent dicot-like anion channels when TMD3 323
together with TMD1 and 2 were exchanged (figure 4D to F). This indicates that during SLAC1 324
evolution in monocots, residues on TMD1 and 2 coevolved together with the IA motif in TMD3 325
to form the nitrate gating site (figure 4C, Table S3). Whether and how the intrinsic nitrate sensor 326
in monocot SLAC1 anion channels contribute to the evolutionary success of cereals remain to 327
be shown. However, it is tempting to speculate that SLAC1 anion channels harbouring an 328
intrinsic nitrate sensor might allow the plant to integrate leaf nitrate levels and the 329
velocity/degree of stomatal closure. 330
331
Evolution of the SLAC1 pore properties 332
We and others showed that SLAC1 channels in dicots are permeable to chloride and nitrate and 333
do not require nitrate as gating modifier (this study and [14, 15, 17, 39]). In contrast, monocot 334
SLAC1 channels, such as HvSLAC1, PdSLAC1 and OsSLAC1, require nitrate at the 335
extracellular face of the anion channel pore to gate open, which is reminiscent of the nitrate 336
dependent gating of AtSLAH3 and PttSLAH3 anion channels [17, 31, 40, 41]. Sequence 337
comparisons identified a VV signature in dicot and an IA signature in monocot SLACs that 338
clearly differ between these two evolutionary distinct plant lineages (figure S3 and S4A). 339
Interestingly, similar to monocot SLAC1s, nitrate activated SLAH2/3 anion channels also 340
possess either an IA or an IS motif on TMD3 (figure S3). 341
SLAC1-type anion channels are found in the most basal land plants such as green algae 342
Klebsormidium nitens as well as in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha [30]. With the 343
emergence of stomata in mosses such as Physcomitrella patens, SLAC1 anion channels co-344
opted the fast ABA-signaling cascade and became OST1-sensitive [30]. figure S3 and S4A 345
shows that the IA motif appeared in moss first and remained largely conserved until the 346
emergence of Arecales (date palm) and Poales lineages that include important grass crops such 347
as rice, maize and barley. In the latter monocots, nitrate-dependent gating is fully functional 348
(this study and [21]). This raises the question of when in evolution SLAC1-type anion channels 349
carrying an IA motive evolved nitrate-dependent gating? 350
To answer this question, we analysed the chord conductance of a set of SLAC1 anion channels 351
derived from evolutionary distinct basal plant lineages including the moss Physcomitrella 352
Schäfer et al.
13
patens, the lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii, the fern Ceratopteris richardii and the 353
seagrass Zostera marina. Apart from the moss PpSLAC1, all tested basal SLAC1 anion 354
channels appeared equally nitrate insensitive as the dicot SLAC1 anion channels from 355
Arabidopsis, tobacco and tomato (figure S4B, figure 2D). This may indicate that nitrate 356
dependent gating evolved as recently as the emergence of monocot species, although the IA 357
motif on TMD3 is already established in a majority of SLAC-type anion channels of basal plant 358
lineages (figure S3 and S4A). In contrast, following the split between dicots and monocots, the 359
SLAC1s from dicot species lost the IA signature and did not develop a nitrate dependent gating 360
mechanism (figure S4A). 361
To further support that nitrate dependent gating in monocot species evolved after the split 362
between monocots and dicots, we employed a probabilistic approach [42], to infer the most 363
probable core SLAC1 sequence (TMD1 to 10) of the common ancestor from which all extant 364
dicot and monocot SLAC1s evolved (figure S4A). This inferred core sequence was synthesized, 365
equipped with the N- and C-terminus of AtSLAC1 and named Ancestral Slow Anion Channel 366
1 (AncSLAC1, sequence can be found in table S4). Interestingly, AncSLAC1 carried the IA 367
motif on TMD3 just like monocot and basal SLAC1s. Following co-expression with CPK6 in 368
Xenopus leavis oocytes, AncSLAC1 displayed typical S-type anion currents that slowly 369
deactivated at hyperpolarized membrane potentials (figure S4C). In line with SLAC1s from 370
dicots but in contrast to nitrate activated monocot SLAC1 channels, AncSLAC1 mediated 371
macroscopic anion currents in both chloride and nitrate-based media (figure S4B and C) and 372
showed no nitrate dependent gating behavior (figure S4D). Thus, both the predicted common 373
ancestor of dicot and monocot SLAC1 channels AncSLAC1 as well as SLAC1 channels from 374
basal plant lineages were equipped with the IA motif on TMD3 but displayed a largely nitrate 375
independent gating behavior, suggesting that monocots have evolved the nitrate dependent 376
gating mechanism after the split from the dicot species. Future studies will address the question, 377
which backbone sites had to emerge in TMD1 and/or 2 together with the IA motif to form a 378
nitrate-sensitive SLAC1 gate in monocots. 379
Schäfer et al.
14
Acknowledgements: Funded by Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Consumer 380
Protection. R.H. and D.G. were supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within 381
the CRC/TR166 ‘‘ReceptorLight’’ project B8 and by the King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. 382
M.E.J. is supported by a grant from the Danish Council for Independent Research: DFF–6108-383
00122. We thank Andreas Ruth for Zostera marina plant material and Ingo Dreyer for initial 384
analysis of signatures in SLAC1 isoforms. 385
386
Author contributions: P.A., M.F., J.H., M.E.J., C.L., S.L., T.M., K.v.M. and N.S. performed 387
the research and analysed the data. T.M., P.A., D.G., A.M.H., and R.H. designed the study. 388
T.M., M.E.J., P.A., J.F., D.G., A.M.H., and R.H. wrote the manuscript. 389
390
Declaration of interests 391
The authors declare that there is no competing financial interest. 392
393
Schäfer et al.
15
References 394
1. Hedrich, R. (2012). Ion channels in plants. Physiol Rev 92, 1777-1811. 395 2. Hedrich, R., and Geiger, D. (2017). Biology of SLAC1-type anion channels - from nutrient uptake 396
to stomatal closure. New Phytol. 397 3. Munemasa, S., Hauser, F., Park, J., Waadt, R., Brandt, B., and Schroeder, J.I. (2015). 398
Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of stomatal aperture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 28, 399 154-162. 400
4. Chen, Z.H., Chen, G., Dai, F., Wang, Y., Hills, A., Ruan, Y.L., Zhang, G., Franks, P.J., Nevo, E., and 401 Blatt, M.R. (2017). Molecular Evolution of Grass Stomata. Trends Plant Sci 22, 124-139. 402
5. Shen, L., Sun, P., Bonnell, V.C., Edwards, K.J., Hetherington, A.M., McAinsh, M.R., and Roberts, 403 M.R. (2015). Measuring stress signaling responses of stomata in isolated epidermis of 404 graminaceous species. Front Plant Sci 6, 533. 405
6. Raissig, M.T., Matos, J.L., Anleu Gil, M.X., Kornfeld, A., Bettadapur, A., Abrash, E., Allison, H.R., 406 Badgley, G., Vogel, J.P., Berry, J.A., et al. (2017). Mobile MUTE specifies subsidiary cells to build 407 physiologically improved grass stomata. Science 355, 1215-1218. 408
7. Kusumi, K., Hashimura, A., Yamamoto, Y., Negi, J., and Iba, K. (2017). Contribution of the S-409 type Anion Channel SLAC1 to Stomatal Control and Its Dependence on Developmental Stage 410 in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol 58, 2085-2094. 411
8. Sun, S.J., Qi, G.N., Gao, Q.F., Wang, H.Q., Yao, F.Y., Hussain, J., and Wang, Y.F. (2016). Protein 412 kinase OsSAPK8 functions as an essential activator of S-type anion channel OsSLAC1, which is 413 nitrate-selective in rice. Planta 243, 489-500. 414
9. Raschke, K., and Fellows, M.P. (1971). Stomatal movement in Zea mays: Shuttle of potassium 415 and chloride between guard cells and subsidiary cells. Planta 101, 296-316. 416
10. Ma, Y., Szostkiewicz, I., Korte, A., Moes, D., Yang, Y., Christmann, A., and Grill, E. (2009). 417 Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science 324, 1064-418 1068. 419
11. Park, S.Y., Fung, P., Nishimura, N., Jensen, D.R., Fujii, H., Zhao, Y., Lumba, S., Santiago, J., 420 Rodrigues, A., Chow, T.F., et al. (2009). Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via 421 the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 324, 1068-1071. 422
12. Soon, F.F., Ng, L.M., Zhou, X.E., West, G.M., Kovach, A., Tan, M.H., Suino-Powell, K.M., He, Y., 423 Xu, Y., Chalmers, M.J., et al. (2012). Molecular mimicry regulates ABA signaling by SnRK2 424 kinases and PP2C phosphatases. Science 335, 85-88. 425
13. Fujii, H., Chinnusamy, V., Rodrigues, A., Rubio, S., Antoni, R., Park, S.Y., Cutler, S.R., Sheen, J., 426 Rodriguez, P.L., and Zhu, J.K. (2009). In vitro reconstitution of an abscisic acid signalling 427 pathway. Nature 462, 660-664. 428
14. Geiger, D., Scherzer, S., Mumm, P., Stange, A., Marten, I., Bauer, H., Ache, P., Matschi, S., Liese, 429 A., Al-Rasheid, K.A., et al. (2009). Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is controlled by 430 drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 21425-21430. 431
15. Lee, S.C., Lan, W., Buchanan, B.B., and Luan, S. (2009). A protein kinase-phosphatase pair 432 interacts with an ion channel to regulate ABA signaling in plant guard cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 433 U S A 106, 21419-21424. 434
16. Ache, P., Becker, D., Ivashikina, N., Dietrich, P., Roelfsema, M.R., and Hedrich, R. (2000). GORK, 435 a delayed outward rectifier expressed in guard cells of Arabidopsis thaliana, is a K(+)-selective, 436 K(+)-sensing ion channel. FEBS Lett 486, 93-98. 437
17. Geiger, D., Maierhofer, T., Al-Rasheid, K.A., Scherzer, S., Mumm, P., Liese, A., Ache, P., 438 Wellmann, C., Marten, I., Grill, E., et al. (2011). Stomatal closure by fast abscisic acid signaling 439 is mediated by the guard cell anion channel SLAH3 and the receptor RCAR1. Science signaling 440 4, ra32. 441
18. Maierhofer, T., Lind, C., Huttl, S., Scherzer, S., Papenfuss, M., Simon, J., Al-Rasheid, K.A., Ache, 442 P., Rennenberg, H., Hedrich, R., et al. (2014). A Single-Pore Residue Renders the Arabidopsis 443 Root Anion Channel SLAH2 Highly Nitrate Selective. The Plant cell 26, 2554-2567. 444
Schäfer et al.
16
19. Brandt, B., Brodsky, D.E., Xue, S., Negi, J., Iba, K., Kangasjarvi, J., Ghassemian, M., Stephan, 445 A.B., Hu, H., and Schroeder, J.I. (2012). Reconstitution of abscisic acid activation of SLAC1 anion 446 channel by CPK6 and OST1 kinases and branched ABI1 PP2C phosphatase action. Proc Natl 447 Acad Sci U S A 109, 10593-10598. 448
20. Amien, S., Kliwer, I., Marton, M.L., Debener, T., Geiger, D., Becker, D., and Dresselhaus, T. 449 (2010). Defensin-like ZmES4 mediates pollen tube burst in maize via opening of the potassium 450 channel KZM1. PLoS biology 8, e1000388. 451
21. Muller, H.M., Schafer, N., Bauer, H., Geiger, D., Lautner, S., Fromm, J., Riederer, M., Bueno, A., 452 Nussbaumer, T., Mayer, K., et al. (2017). The desert plant Phoenix dactylifera closes stomata 453 via nitrate-regulated SLAC1 anion channel. New Phytologist 216, 150-162. 454
22. Buchsenschutz, K., Marten, I., Becker, D., Philippar, K., Ache, P., and Hedrich, R. (2005). 455 Differential expression of K+ channels between guard cells and subsidiary cells within the 456 maize stomatal complex. Planta 222, 968-976. 457
23. Fricke, W., Pritchard, J., Leigh, R.A., and Tomos, A.D. (1994). Cells of the Upper and Lower 458 Epidermis of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Leaves Exhibit Distinct Patterns of Vacuolar Solutes. 459 Plant Physiol 104, 1201-1208. 460
24. Yamauchi, S., Takemiya, A., Sakamoto, T., Kurata, T., Tsutsumi, T., Kinoshita, T., and Shimazaki, 461 K. (2016). The Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase AHA1 Plays a Major Role in Stomatal Opening in 462 Response to Blue Light. Plant Physiol 171, 2731-2743. 463
25. Bauer, H., Ache, P., Lautner, S., Fromm, J., Hartung, W., Al-Rasheid, K.A., Sonnewald, S., 464 Sonnewald, U., Kneitz, S., Lachmann, N., et al. (2013). The stomatal response to reduced 465 relative humidity requires guard cell-autonomous ABA synthesis. Curr Biol 23, 53-57. 466
26. Belin, C., de Franco, P.O., Bourbousse, C., Chaignepain, S., Schmitter, J.M., Vavasseur, A., 467 Giraudat, J., Barbier-Brygoo, H., and Thomine, S. (2006). Identification of features regulating 468 OST1 kinase activity and OST1 function in guard cells. Plant Physiol 141, 1316-1327. 469
27. Boudsocq, M., Droillard, M.J., Barbier-Brygoo, H., and Lauriere, C. (2007). Different 470 phosphorylation mechanisms are involved in the activation of sucrose non-fermenting 1 471 related protein kinases 2 by osmotic stresses and abscisic acid. Plant Mol Biol 63, 491-503. 472
28. Yoshida, R., Umezawa, T., Mizoguchi, T., Takahashi, S., Takahashi, F., and Shinozaki, K. (2006). 473 The regulatory domain of SRK2E/OST1/SnRK2.6 interacts with ABI1 and integrates abscisic acid 474 (ABA) and osmotic stress signals controlling stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 281, 475 5310-5318. 476
29. McAdam, S.A., Brodribb, T.J., Banks, J.A., Hedrich, R., Atallah, N.M., Cai, C., Geringer, M.A., 477 Lind, C., Nichols, D.S., Stachowski, K., et al. (2016). Abscisic acid controlled sex before 478 transpiration in vascular plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, 12862-12867. 479
30. Lind, C., Dreyer, I., Lopez-Sanjurjo, E.J., von Meyer, K., Ishizaki, K., Kohchi, T., Lang, D., Zhao, Y., 480 Kreuzer, I., Al-Rasheid, K.A., et al. (2015). Stomatal Guard Cells Co-opted an Ancient ABA-481 Dependent Desiccation Survival System to Regulate Stomatal Closure. Curr Biol 25, 928-935. 482
31. Maierhofer, T., Diekmann, M., Offenborn, J.N., Lind, C., Bauer, H., Hashimoto, K., KA, S.A.-R., 483 Luan, S., Kudla, J., Geiger, D., et al. (2014). Site- and kinase-specific phosphorylation-mediated 484 activation of SLAC1, a guard cell anion channel stimulated by abscisic acid. Science signaling 7, 485 ra86. 486
32. Scherzer, S., Maierhofer, T., Al-Rasheid, K.A., Geiger, D., and Hedrich, R. (2012). Multiple 487 calcium-dependent kinases modulate ABA-activated guard cell anion channels. Molecular 488 plant 5, 1409-1412. 489
33. Desikan, R., Griffiths, R., Hancock, J., and Neill, S. (2002). A new role for an old enzyme: nitrate 490 reductase-mediated nitric oxide generation is required for abscisic acid-induced stomatal 491 closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 16314-16318. 492
34. Kawachi, T., Shoji, Y., Sugimoto, T., Oji, Y.L., Kleinhofs, A., Warner, R.L., Ohtake, N., Ohyama, 493 T., and Sueyoshi, K. (2002). Role of xylem sap nitrate in the regulation of nitrate reductase gene 494 expression in leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seedlings. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 48, 79-85. 495
Schäfer et al.
17
35. Sueyoshi, K., Kleinhofs, A., and Warner, R.L. (1995). Expression of Nadh-Specific and Nad(P)H-496 Bispecific Nitrate Reductase Genes in Response to Nitrate in Barley. Plant Physiology 107, 497 1303-1311. 498
36. Chen, Y.H., Hu, L., Punta, M., Bruni, R., Hillerich, B., Kloss, B., Rost, B., Love, J., Siegelbaum, S.A., 499 and Hendrickson, W.A. (2010). Homologue structure of the SLAC1 anion channel for closing 500 stomata in leaves. Nature 467, 1074-1080. 501
37. Franks, P.J., and Farquhar, G.D. (2007). The mechanical diversity of stomata and its significance 502 in gas-exchange control. Plant Physiol 143, 78-87. 503
38. Hetherington, A.M., and Woodward, F.I. (2003). The role of stomata in sensing and driving 504 environmental change. Nature 424, 901-908. 505
39. Geiger, D., Scherzer, S., Mumm, P., Marten, I., Ache, P., Matschi, S., Liese, A., Wellmann, C., Al-506 Rasheid, K.A., Grill, E., et al. (2010). Guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is regulated by CDPK 507 protein kinases with distinct Ca2+ affinities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 8023-8028. 508
40. Jaborsky, M., Maierhofer, T., Olbrich, A., Escalante-Perez, M., Muller, H.M., Simon, J., Krol, E., 509 Cuin, T.A., Fromm, J., Ache, P., et al. (2016). SLAH3-type anion channel expressed in poplar 510 secretory epithelia operates in calcium kinase CPK-autonomous manner. New Phytol 210, 922-511 933. 512
41. Demir, F., Horntrich, C., Blachutzik, J.O., Scherzer, S., Reinders, Y., Kierszniowska, S., Schulze, 513 W.X., Harms, G.S., Hedrich, R., Geiger, D., et al. (2013). Arabidopsis nanodomain-delimited ABA 514 signaling pathway regulates the anion channel SLAH3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 8296-8301. 515
42. Ashkenazy, H., Penn, O., Doron-Faigenboim, A., Cohen, O., Cannarozzi, G., Zomer, O., and 516 Pupko, T. (2012). FastML: a web server for probabilistic reconstruction of ancestral sequences. 517 Nucleic Acids Res 40, W580-584. 518
43. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., and Schulten, K. (1996). VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol 519 Graph 14, 33-38, 27-38. 520
44. Mascher, M., Gundlach, H., Himmelbach, A., Beier, S., Twardziok, S.O., Wicker, T., Radchuk, V., 521 Dockter, C., Hedley, P.E., Russell, J., et al. (2017). A chromosome conformation capture 522 ordered sequence of the barley genome. Nature 544, 427-433. 523
45. Kim, D., Langmead, B., and Salzberg, S.L. (2015). HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory 524 requirements. Nat Methods 12, 357-360. 525
46. Liao, Y., Smyth, G.K., and Shi, W. (2014). featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program 526 for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923-930. 527
47. Wagner, G.P., Kin, K., and Lynch, V.J. (2012). Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-528 seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory Biosci 131, 281-285. 529
48. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. (1990). Basic local alignment 530 search tool. J Mol Biol 215, 403-410. 531
49. Arabidopsis Genome, I. (2000). Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant 532 Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796-815. 533
50. Usadel, B., Poree, F., Nagel, A., Lohse, M., Czedik-Eysenberg, A., and Stitt, M. (2009). A guide 534 to using MapMan to visualize and compare Omics data in plants: a case study in the crop 535 species, Maize. Plant Cell Environ 32, 1211-1229. 536
51. An, Y.Q., McDowell, J.M., Huang, S., McKinney, E.C., Chambliss, S., and Meagher, R.B. (1996). 537 Strong, constitutive expression of the Arabidopsis ACT2/ACT8 actin subclass in vegetative 538 tissues. Plant J 10, 107-121. 539
52. Szyroki, A., Ivashikina, N., Dietrich, P., Roelfsema, M.R., Ache, P., Reintanz, B., Deeken, R., 540 Godde, M., Felle, H., Steinmeyer, R., et al. (2001). KAT1 is not essential for stomatal opening. 541 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 2917-2921. 542
53. Nour-Eldin, H.H., Hansen, B.G., Norholm, M.H., Jensen, J.K., and Halkier, B.A. (2006). Advancing 543 uracil-excision based cloning towards an ideal technique for cloning PCR fragments. Nucleic 544 Acids Res 34, e122. 545
Schäfer et al.
18
54. Dadacz-Narloch, B., Beyhl, D., Larisch, C., Lopez-Sanjurjo, E.J., Reski, R., Kuchitsu, K., Muller, 546 T.D., Becker, D., Schonknecht, G., and Hedrich, R. (2011). A novel calcium binding site in the 547 slow vacuolar cation channel TPC1 senses luminal calcium levels. The Plant cell 23, 2696-2707. 548
55. Norholm, M.H. (2010). A mutant Pfu DNA polymerase designed for advanced uracil-excision 549 DNA engineering. BMC Biotechnol 10, 21. 550
56. Geu-Flores, F., Nour-Eldin, H.H., Nielsen, M.T., and Halkier, B.A. (2007). USER fusion: a rapid 551 and efficient method for simultaneous fusion and cloning of multiple PCR products. Nucleic 552 Acids Res 35, e55. 553
57. Hopf, T.A., Colwell, L.J., Sheridan, R., Rost, B., Sander, C., and Marks, D.S. (2012). Three-554 dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell 149, 1607-1621. 555
58. Marks, D.S., Colwell, L.J., Sheridan, R., Hopf, T.A., Pagnani, A., Zecchina, R., and Sander, C. 556 (2011). Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS One 6, 557 e28766. 558
59. Edgar, R.C. (2004). MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high 559 throughput. Nucleic acids research 32, 1792-1797. 560
60. Pettersen, E.F., Goddard, T.D., Huang, C.C., Couch, G.S., Greenblatt, D.M., Meng, E.C., and 561 Ferrin, T.E. (2004). UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. 562 J Comput Chem 25, 1605-1612. 563
61. Crooks, G.E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J.M., and Brenner, S.E. (2004). WebLogo: a sequence logo 564 generator. Genome Res 14, 1188-1190. 565
62. Clamp, M., Cuff, J., Searle, S.M., and Barton, G.J. (2004). The Jalview Java alignment editor. 566 Bioinformatics 20, 426-427. 567
63. Huelsenbeck, J.P., and Ronquist, F. (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. 568 Bioinformatics 17, 754-755. 569
64. Jørgensen, M.E., Xu, D., Crocoll, C., Ramírez, D., Motawia, M.S., Olsen, C.E., Nour-Eldin, H.H., 570 and Halkier, B.A. (2017). Origin and evolution of transporter substrate specificity within the 571 NPF family. eLife 6, e19466. 572
65. Darriba, D., Taboada, G.L., Doallo, R., and Posada, D. (2011). ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-573 fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 574
66. Le, S.Q., and Gascuel, O. (2008). An Improved General Amino Acid Replacement Matrix. 575 Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 1307-1320. 576
67. Reeves, J.H. (1992). HETEROGENEITY IN THE SUBSTITUTION PROCESS OF AMINO-ACID SITES 577 OF PROTEINS CODED FOR BY MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 35, 17-31. 578
68. Yang, Z. (1993). Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when 579 substitution rates differ over sites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10, 1396-1401. 580
69. Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W., and Schwartz, T. (2011). The CIPRES science gateway: a community 581 resource for phylogenetic analyses. In Proceedings of the 2011 TeraGrid Conference: Extreme 582 Digital Discovery. (Salt Lake City, Utah: ACM), pp. 1-8. 583
584
Schäfer et al.
19
Figure legends 585
Figure 1: ABA induced stomatal closure requires NO3-. Barley stomatal movement 586
measured by infrared gas exchange. Barley stomata were opened in the light (400 μE) at 587
ambient CO2 (400 ppm). (A) Excised leaves were supplied with water and ABA via the 588
transpiration stream. Note, stomatal closure in the presence of ABA was remarkably slow and 589
largely incomplete. (B) Leaves were pre-incubated with 5 mM nitrate. Under this condition 590
leaves started to close their stomata 5 min after ABA application. This process was largely 591
completed within 10 minutes and finished in less than 15 min. Data were normalized to their 592
open value 10 minutes before the application of ABA (indicated by the arrow). n ≥ 5 means ± 593
SE. (C) EDX-analysis of barley stomatal complexes. The respective changes in K- (left) and 594
Cl-contents (right) are shown after the transition from open to closed stomata in guard cells 595
(GC) and subsidiary cells (SC). During stomatal opening potassium and chloride ions shuttle 596
from subsidiary cells to guard cells, while ions move in the opposite direction when stomata 597
close. n = 11, means ± SE. 598
Figure 2. Nitrate-dependent activation of HvSLAC1. See also figure S2. (A) Whole-oocyte 599
currents of Xenopus oocytes expressing HvSLAC1 alone or co-expressing either AtOST1 or 600
AtCPK6 were measured in response to the standard voltage protocol. Currents were recorded 601
in standard buffers containing either 3 mM chloride, 30 mM chloride or 30 mM nitrate. 602
Representative cells of 2 independent experiments with n = 3 oocytes are shown. See also 603
figure S2A. (B) Whole-oocyte currents of oocytes expressing HvSLAC1 equipped with the C-604
terminal half of YFP (HvSLAC1:YC) either expressed alone or together with WT OST1, OST1 605
D140A or WT OST1 and ABI1. Both OST1 versions were fused to the N-terminal half of YFP 606
(OST1:YN, OST1 D140A:YN). Currents were recorded in nitrate-based buffers (30 mM). 607
Representative cells are shown. Co-expression of HvSLAC1 and OST1 or OST1 D140A was 608
confirmed by detection of YFP fluorescence. Quarter of representative oocytes of 2 independent 609
experiments with n = 4 oocytes are shown. (C) Statistical analysis of the steady-state currents 610
at -100 mV derived from the experiment described in (B) (n = 4 experiments, mean ± SD). (D) 611
Chord conductance recorded at a membrane potential of -120 mV of oocytes co-expressing 612
AtOST1 with SLAC1 from different plant species indicated in the figure. Chord conductance 613
was calculated from instantaneous currents recorded in chloride- or nitrate-based buffers (100 614
mM). Chord conductance in nitrate was set to 1 (n ≥ 4 from 2 independent experiments, mean 615
± SD). 616
Schäfer et al.
20
Figure 3: Nitrate activates HvSLAC1 by shifting its rel. open probability to 617
hyperpolarized voltages. See also figure S2. (A) Nitrate-dependence of steady-state currents 618
(ISS) of oocytes co-expressing HvSLAC1 and AtCPK6 are plotted as a function of the applied 619
membrane potential (n = 4 from 2 independent experiments, mean ± SD). (B) The relative open 620
probability (rel. PO) measured in different NO3- concentrations of HvSLAC1/AtCPK6-621
expressing oocytes was plotted against the membrane potential. Data points were fitted with a 622
single Boltzmann equation (solid lines, n = 4 from 2 independent experiments, mean ± SD). 623
(C) Steady-state currents (ISS) of oocytes co-expressing HvSLAC1 and AtCPK6 recorded in the 624
presence of different external chloride concentrations or 30 mM nitrate (n = 4from 2 625
independent experiments, mean ± SD). (D) The relative open probability (rel. PO) of HvSLAC1 626
in the presence of different Cl--concentrations or 30 mM NO3- was plotted against the 627
membrane potential. Data points were fitted with a single Boltzmann equation (solid lines, n = 628
4 from 2 independent experiments, mean ± SD). (E) The half-maximal PO (V1/2) calculated from 629
the data in (B) was plotted against the nitrate concentration. A Michaelis-Menten equation was 630
used to calculate a K0.5 of 10.9 mM NO3- (n = 4, mean ± SD). (F) Steady-state currents of 631
HvSLAC1 and AtCPK6 co-expressing oocytes in the presence of different Cl-/NO3--ratios were 632
plotted against the applied voltage (n = 4 from 2 independent experiments, mean ± SD). (G) 633
The relative open probability (rel. PO) of HvSLAC1 in different Cl-/NO3--ratios was plotted 634
against the membrane potential. Data points were fitted with a single Boltzmann equation (solid 635
lines, n = 4 experiments, mean ± SD). 636
Figure 4: IA-motif on TMD3 coevolved with residues on TMD1 and 2 to provide monocot 637
SLAC1 anion channels with a nitrate-depending gating mechanism. See also figure S3 and 638
S4 as well as table S3 and S4. (A) Frequency loges of transmembrane three (TMD3) from 639
SLAC1 anion channels of different monocot or dicot species. The respective sequence 640
alignment is shown in figure S3. The most prominent difference (IA motif in monocots vs. 641
VV/IV motif in dicots) is marked with a red box. (B) Chord conductance at -120 mV of 642
AtSLAC1 WT and AtSLAC1 V272I V273A compared to HvSLAC1 WT and HvSLAC1 I286V 643
A287V or PdSLAC1 WT and PdSLAC1 I285V A286V. All channels and mutants thereof were 644
co-expressed with CPK6. Currents were recorded in nitrate- or chloride-based buffers. (n = 4 645
from 2 independent experiments, mean ± SD). Note, the phenotypes of HvSLAC1 and 646
AtSLAC1 anion channels were highly reproducible showing nitrate-independent gating 647
properties of AtSLAC1 and nitrate-dependent gating of HvSLAC1 expressing oocytes. In 648
contrast, with the mutant AtSLAC1 V272I V273A we observed a conditional phenotype 649
strongly dependent on the investigated oocyte batch. In 30 % of the tested oocyte batches the 650
Schäfer et al.
21
mutations in the selectivity signature converted AtSLAC1 into a HvSLAC1-type nitrate-651
dependent anion channel (these data are shown in this study) whereas the remaining oocyte 652
batches revealed a AtSLAC1 WT behaviour. (C) Evolutionary coupling analysis. The top 50 653
amino acid residues (see also table S3) that showed evolutionary coupling to AtSLAC1-V272 654
and V273 (purple spheres) were highlighted in red on previously generated homology models 655
[18, 36] using VMD [43]. Note, some of the highlighted residues co-evolved with both V272 656
and V273. The sphere size of co-evolved residues does not relate to the evolutionary coupling 657
strength but reflects the side chain size. TMD1 is depicted in dark grey, TMD2 in green and 658
TMD3 in light grey. The remaining TMDs are shown in transparent orange. (D) Chord 659
conductance of oocytes co-expressing AtCPK6 with either AtSLAC1, HvSLAC1 or one of the 660
indicated chimeras. Currents were recorded in nitrate or chloride-based buffers. Chord 661
conductance for nitrate was set to 1 (n = 4 from 2 independent experiments, mean ± SD). See 662
also Figure S4B. (E) and (F) Relative open probability (rel. PO) of (E) AtSLAC1 and the 663
chimera AtSLAC1(HvTMD1-3) or (F) HvSLAC1 and HvSLAC1(AtTMD1-3) in the presence 664
of 30 mM chloride or nitrate (n=4 from 2 independent experiments, mean ± SD). 665
666
Schäfer et al.
22
STAR Methods 667
CONTACT FOR REAGENT AND RESOURCE SHARING 668
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be 669
fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Dietmar Geiger ([email protected]). 670
671
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS 672
Plant material and growth conditions 673
Barley (Hordeum vulgare cv. Barke) seeds were provided by a commercial supplier (Saatzucht 674
J. Breun GmbH & Co. KG) and cultivated at 22/16 °C and 50 ± 5% RH at a 12/12h day/night 675
cycle and a photon flux density of 500 μmol m-2 sec-1 white light (Philips Master T Green 676
Powers, 400 W). 677
Xenopus oocyte preparation 678
Investigations on SLAC1 anion channels were performed in oocytes of the African clawfrog 679
Xenopus laevis. Permission for keeping Xenopus exists at the Julius-von-Sachs Institute and is 680
registered at the government of Lower Franconia (reference number 70/14). Mature female 681
Xenopus laevis frogs (healthy, non-immunized and not involved in any previous procedures) 682
were kept at 20 °C at a 12/12h day/night cycle in dark grey 96 litres tanks (5 frogs/tank). Frogs 683
were fed twice a week with floating trout food (Fisch-Fit Mast 45/7 2mm, Interquell GmbH, 684
Wehringen, Germany). Tanks are equipped with 30 cm long PVC pipes with a diameter of 685
around 10 cm. These pipes are used as hiding places for the frogs. The water is continuously 686
circulated and filtered by a small aquarium pump. For oocyte isolation, mature female X. laevis 687
frogs were anesthetized by immersion in water containing 0.1% 3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl 688
ester. Following partial ovariectomy, stage V or VI oocytes were treated with 0.14 mg/ml 689
collagenase I in Ca2+-free ND96 buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 690
mM MgCl2,) for 1.5 h. Subsequently, oocytes were washed with Ca2+-free ND96 buffer and 691
kept at 16 °C in ND96 solution (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 692
1mM CaCl2) containing 50mg/l gentamycin. For oocyte BiFC and electrophysiological 693
experiments 10 ng of each cRNA was injected into selected oocytes. Oocytes were incubated 694
for 2 days at 16 °C in ND96 solution containing gentamycin. 695
696
METHODS DETAILS 697
Field Code Changed
Schäfer et al.
23
RNA sequencing 698
Epidermal peels were collected from the abaxial side of 8 to 10-day-old leaves. To prepare 699
isolated epidermal peels [5], leaves were cut from the plant and bent over the forefinger with 700
the adaxial surface facing upward. A shallow cut was made with a sharp razor blade horizontally 701
across the leaf and a flap of leaf tissue lifted with a razor, leaving the lower epidermis intact. 702
The leaf tissue was removed from the epidermis with forceps. RNA was extracted from a total 703
of 20 epidermal peels per sample using the NucleoSpin® RNA Plant Kit (Macherey-704
Nagel,Drueren, Germany). RNA isolation from whole leaves was performed similarly. 705
The extracted RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, 706
USA). Quality control measurements were performed on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa 707
Clara, CA, USA) and the concentration was determined using a Nanodrop ND-1000 708
spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). Following RNA 709
isolation, we sequenced RNA of one sample, each to get a first overview of genes in barley 710
guard cell complexes that are known to be involved in stomatal movements. In addition, we 711
were thus able to obtain the sequence information for cloning selected transporters and 712
channels. Libraries were prepared with the TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 (Illumina, San 713
Diego, CA, USA) using 1 µg of RNA and sequenced on a HiSeq 3000 (Illumina) resulting in a 714
sequence depth of 35 million paired-end reads (2x 150bp). 715
RNA-seq data analysis 716
Sequencing adaptors were initially removed, and the overall high quality of the remaining reads 717
was confirmed using FastQC (FASTQC v0.10.1, Andrews: 718
http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) (average Phred quality score of 719
>30 across all bases at each position in the FastQ files). Subsequently, reads were aligned to 720
the barley reference assembly [44] using Hisat2 (hisat2-2.0.3-beta) [45] by applying default 721
settings for paired-end data. The featureCounts function of the subread-1.4.6 package [46] was 722
used to generate counts for high-confidence genes of barley [44]. Only uniquely mapped read 723
pairs were counted. Data normalization was performed by calculating TPM (Transcripts Per 724
Kilobase Million) [47] values. 725
Functional annotation of barley 726
The functional annotation of the barley genes was provided by Mascher et al. (2017 [44]). Best 727
hits of a BLASTP [48] alignment of barley high-confidence protein sequences against the A. 728
Schäfer et al.
24
thaliana protein sequences (TAIR10, [49]) were used to assign A. thaliana genes and the 729
corresponding MapMan categories [50] to barley genes. 730
Gas exchange experiments 731
For gas exchange measurements [21], we used detached leaves of 8 to 10-day-old Hordeum 732
vulgare cv. Barke. The leaves were cut under water to avoid xylem embolism and immediately 733
placed in deionized water or 5 mM KNO3 and kept there for the whole measurement period. 734
The effect of ABA application with or without KNO3 on the transpirational water loss was 735
measured at a photon flux density of 500 µmol m-2s-1. After stabilization of the transpiration 736
ABA with a final concentration of 25 µM was fed into the water reservoir containing either 737
deionized water or 5 mM KNO3. Transpirational water loss was measured under constant 738
conditions: air humidity of 52.5 %, temperature of 20 °C, and a photon flux density of 500 µmol 739
m-2 s-1. 740
qPCR 741
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiments were performed with samples taken from whole leaves 742
epidermal peels and highly guard cell enriched tissue. Epidermal peels from 12-day-old Barley 743
(cv. Barke) leaves were isolated according to [5]. Thereby only the guard cell subsidiary cell 744
complex survives. For guard cell samples we used the “blender method” on epidermal peels 745
with mature, intact guard cells to mechanically and selectively destroy the subsidiary cells while 746
keeping guard cells alive. Guard cell were enriched within 8 minutes by successive blender 747
cycles (45 seconds each) in ice-cold deionized water with additional crushed ice and filtered 748
through a 210-µm nylon mash. After two rounds of blending, the remaining light green 749
epidermal fraction was further processed. Neutral red staining indicated that at least 90% of the 750
viable cells in the preparations were guard cells. Total RNA from at least three individual 751
biological replicates was prepared using the NucleoSpin® RNA Plant Kit (Macherey Nagel, 752
Drueren, Germany) and stored for subsequent microarray hybridizations or qPCR. 753
For qPCR potential DNA contamination was removed from total RNA by treatment with 754
RNase-Free DNase I (Thermo Scientific, Waltham MA) according to the manufacturer’s 755
protocol. First-strand cDNA was prepared using 2.5 µg RNA with the M-MLV-RT kit 756
(Promega, Mannheim, Germany). First-strand cDNA samples were 20-fold diluted in water and 757
subjected to qPCR using a Mastercycler® ep Realplex2S (Eppendorf) with the ABsolute SYBR 758
Capillary Mix (Thermo Scientific, Waltham MA) in 20 µl reaction volumes. Primers used (TIB 759
MOLBIOL, Germany) have been designed according to the sequences from the RNA-seq 760
analyses and validated prior to qPCR. All primers were chosen to amplify fragments not 761
Schäfer et al.
25
exceeding 500 base pairs. Each transcript was quantified using individual standards. To enable 762
detection of contaminating genomic DNA, PCR was performed with the same RNA as template 763
that was used for cDNA synthesis. Transcripts were each normalized to 10.000 molecules of 764
barley actin4/1. These barley actin fragments, used as house-keeping genes, were homologous 765
to actins 2 and 8 constitutively expressed in most Arabidopsis tissues (for details see [51, 52]. 766
All kits were used according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The primers are listed in the Key 767
Resources Table. 768
Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA) 769
Leaf samples with open and closed stomata were prepared using the gas exchange setup. Cut 770
leaves were either treated with opening conditions (500 µmol m-2 s-1 light, 0 ppm CO2) or 771
closing conditions (darkness, 1000 ppm CO2) until the transpirational water loss stabilized. The 772
samples were then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and lyophilized over a period of 3 days 773
in an ice condenser (Alpha 1-2, Christ GmbH, Germany) under vacuum (R25, Vacuubrand 774
GmbH & CO. KG, Germany) at -55 °C. After the following freeze-drying process leaves were 775
coated with carbon before being examined by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, S-520 776
Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray device (EDX eumex Si(Li)-777
detector, EUMEX GV, Mainz, Germany). Single-point measurements on guard cells as well as 778
on subsidiary cells were performed at 10 keV excitation energy, which excites a measurement 779
area of < 2 µm in diameter. Element concentration provided by the analysis data represents the 780
atomic ratio of the analysed ions in percent. 781
Cloning and cRNA synthesis 782
The complementary DNAs (cDNAs) of various SLAC1 anion channels, AtSLAH2, AtCPK6, 783
AtABI1 and AtOST1 were cloned into oocyte expression vectors or BiFC expression vectors 784
(both are based on pGEM vectors), by an advanced uracil-excision-based cloning technique as 785
described by [53]. Site-directed mutations were introduced by means of a modified USER 786
fusion method as described by [54, 55]. In brief, the coding sequence of the respective anion 787
channel or kinase within an oocyte expression vector (based on pNBIu vectors, see KEY 788
RESOURCES TABLE) was used as a template for USER mutagenesis. Overlapping primer 789
pairs (overlap covering 8 to 14 bp including the mutagenesis site, see Table S5) were designed 790
[53]. PCR conditions were essentially as described by Nørholm et al (2010, [55]) using PfuX7 791
polymerase. PCR products were treated with the USER enzyme (New England Biolabs, 792
Ipswich, MA, USA) to remove the uracil residues, generating single-stranded overlapping ends. 793
Following uracil excision, recirculation of the plasmid was performed at 37°C for 30 minutes 794
Schäfer et al.
26
followed by 30 minutes at room temperature, and then constructs were immediately 795
transformed into chemical competent Escherichia coli cells (XL1-Blue MRF’). All mutants 796
were verified by sequencing. [54]. The cDNA of Arabidopsis/barley chimeras was also cloned 797
into oocyte expression vectors using a combination of the advanced uracil-excision-based 798
cloning technique and the USER fusion technique [53, 56]. Primers are listed in table S5. For 799
functional analysis, complementary RNA (cRNA) was prepared with the AmpliCap-Max T7 800
High Yield Message Maker Kit (Cellscript, Madison, WI, USA). Oocyte preparation and cRNA 801
injection is described in Experimental Model and Subject Details. 802
Protein-protein interaction studies (BiFC) 803
For documentation of the oocyte BiFC results, pictures were taken with a Leica SP5 confocal 804
laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) equipped 805
with multiphoton laser of the Mai Tai-Series (Spectra Physics, Santa Clara, USA) and a Leica 806
HCX IRAPO L25×/0.95W objective. 807
Oocyte recordings 808
In double-electrode voltage-clamp studies, oocytes were perfused with Tris/Mes-based buffers. 809
The standard solution contained 10 mM Tris/Mes (pH 5.6), 1 mM Ca(gluconate)2, 1 mM 810
Mg(gluconate)2, 1 mM LaCl3 and 100 mM NaCl, NaNO3 or Na(gluconate). To balance the ionic 811
strength, we compensated for changes in the nitrate or chloride concentration with 812
Na(gluconate). Solutions for anion selectivity measurements were composed of 50 mM malate-813
, sulphate2-, Cl−, NO3− or gluconate−, 1 mM Ca(gluconate)2; 1 mM Mg(gluconate)2; and 10 mM 814
Tris/Mes (pH 7.5). Osmolality was adjusted to 220 mosmol/kg with D-sorbitol. For recording 815
representative current traces, steady-state currents (ISS) and for calculating the voltage 816
dependent relative open probability (rel. PO) standard voltage protocol was as follows: Starting 817
from a holding potential (VH) of 0 mV, single-voltage pulses were applied in 20 mV decrements 818
from +40 to −200 mV. Rel. PO was calculated from a −120 mV voltage pulse following the test 819
pulses of the standard voltage protocol by fitting the experimental data points with a Boltzmann 820
equation [31] of the form: rel. PO = offset + 1 / (1 + exp (V1/2 – Vm) / z), where V1/2 is the half 821
maximal activation voltage, Vm is the membrane potential and z is the slope of the Boltzmann 822
function. The currents were normalized to the saturation value of the calculated Boltzmann 823
distribution. Instantaneous currents (Iinst) were extracted immediately after the voltage jump 824
from the holding potential of 0 mV to 50 ms test pulses ranging from +70 to −150 mV. The 825
reversal potentials (Vrev) used for the calculation of the rel. permeability were recorded in the 826
current-clamp mode [18]. For determination of Vrev for the respective anion, oocytes were 827
Schäfer et al.
27
preincubated in 50 mM NO3- to gain full activity of the channel. The relative permeability was 828
calculated as described in [36] using the following equation: 829
𝑃𝑋
𝑃𝑁𝑂3=
[𝑁𝑂3−]𝑜
[𝑋−]𝑜𝑒(𝐸𝑋−𝐸𝑁𝑂3)𝐹
𝑅𝑇 for monovalent anions and 𝑃𝑋
𝑃𝑁𝑂3=
[𝑁𝑂3−]𝑜
4[𝑋2−]𝑜𝑒(𝐸𝑋−𝐸𝑁𝑂3)𝐹
𝑅𝑇 (𝑒−𝐸𝑋𝐹
𝑅𝑇 + 1) 830
for anions differing in valence (divalent and monovalent). [NO3−]o is the external concentration 831
of the control (nitrate-based) solution and [X−]o is the external concentration of the test anion. 832
ENO3 is the reversal potential with nitrate and EX is the reversal potential for the external test 833
anion. F and R are the Faraday and gas constants, respectively, and T is the absolute 834
temperature. 835
To calculate the chord conductance, the reversal potential (Vrev) was determined by fitting the 836
instantaneous currents in chloride- and nitrate-containing standard buffers with a linear 837
function. Using the instantaneous currents at –120 mV, the chord conductance could be 838
calculated with the equation ganion = Ianion / (V - Vrev) [31]. 839
Evolutionary coupling analysis 840
EVfold/EVcouplings (www.evfold.org) [57, 58], a publicly available bioinformatics server, 841
was used to predict evolutionary couplings of the amino acid residues V272 an V273 in 842
AtSLAC1. We used the default transmembrane protein settings and the DI setting as the 843
coupling scoring function. Multiple sequence alignment was done with default settings and 844
resulted in 468 sequences with a e-value cut off of -3. The top 50 amino acid residues (see table 845
S3) that showed evolutionary coupling to AtSLAC1-V272 and V273 were highlighted on 846
previously generated homology models [36] using VMD [43]. 847
Frequency logos of TMD1 to 3 848
Selected SLAC1 homologs were identified by BLASTP (Sequences can be found in table S4). 849
Sequences were aligned using MUSCLE [59] with a gap open penalty of -2.9, gap extend of 0 850
and hydrophobicity multiplier of 5. Transmembrane helix 1, 2 and 3 were identified in the 851
homology model of AtSLAC1 [18] using chimera [60]. Frequency logos were created based on 852
alignments of transmembrane helix 1, 2 and 3 using the weblogo program [61]. Jalview [62] 853
was used to visualize transmembrane helix 1, 2 and 3 alignments. 854
Alignment, phylogenetic analysis and inference of ancestral SLAC1 855
Alignment 856
Field Code Changed
Schäfer et al.
28
Selected SLAC1 homologs were identified by BLASTP. Sequences were aligned using 857
MUSCLE [59] with a gap open penalty of -2.9, gap extend of 0 and hydrophobicity multiplier 858
of 5. Gaps introduced by parts of the sequence supported by 4 or less genes were trimmed. 859
Phylogenetic analysis 860
MrBayes 3.2.6 [63] was used to infer the Bayesian phylogenetic tree as previously described 861
[64]. Briefly, Prottest v3.4.2 [65] identified the appropriate LG based phylogenetic model as 862
LG+I+G that use a general amino acid replacement matrix [66] with a proportion of invariable 863
sites (+I) [67] that use a gamma distribution for modelling the rate heterogeneity (+G) [68]. 864
Bayesian inference trees were calculated until convergence was reached (“average standard 865
deviation of split frequencies” <0.01). The temperature heating parameter was set to 0.05 866
(temp=0.05) to increase the chain swap acceptance rates, this reduce the chance of Markov 867
chains getting stuck at local high-probability peaks. Burn-in was set to 25% (burninfrac=0.25) 868
and the number of Markov chains was set to 8 (nchains=8). 869
RAxML 870
The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was inferred using RAxML 8.2.9 as previously 871
described [64]. Briefly, Prottest v3.4.2 [65] identified LG+I+G as the best phylogenetic model. 872
1000 bootstrap replicate searches were performed, and the bootstrap values were portrayed on 873
the MrBayes generated consensus tree when MrBayes values were below 0.95. SLAC1 from 874
MP was used as the out-group. All analyses were run in MPI via the CIPRES SCIENCE 875
GATEWAY [69] at the San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC). Trees were visualized in 876
figtree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) and annotated with Adobe Illustrator. 877
Inference of ancestral sequence 878
The topology of the phylogenetic tree inferred by MrBayes and RAxML were identical and we 879
used this multiple sequence alignment and the phylogenetic tree as input for inference of the 880
ancestral sequence of the last common ancestor of monocots and dicots. Probabilities for the 881
ancestral sequence at the split between monocots and dicots (figure S4A) was calculated using 882
the LG model of substitution by FastML [42]. The top 100 most likely sequences showed a log 883
likelihood difference of only 0.19 which suggests that sequence #1 and #100 are almost as likely 884
to be true. The N- and C-terminus of SLAC1 has activating/regulatory roles and thus we, 885
respectively, substituted the residues 1-182 and 514-556 from the AncSLAC1 N- and C-886
terminal residues with the corresponding residues from AtSLAC1 (for sequence information 887
Field Code Changed
Schäfer et al.
29
see table S4). We resurrected AncSLAC1 by GeneStrand synthesis (Eurofins Medigenomix 888
GmbH, Campus Ebersberg, Germany). 889
890
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES 891
All experiment was performed at least two times (independent experiments). Sample size, n, 892
and statistical details (mean ± standard error, SE or standard deviation, SD) for each experiment 893
are given in the figure legends. Statistical significances based on one-way ANOVA. For 894
statistical analysis the software Igor Pro7 (waveMetrics, Inc., Lake Oswego, Oregon, USA), 895
Excel (Microsoft Corp. Redmond, Washington, USA) was used. 896
897
DATA AND SOFTWARE AVAILABILITY 898
Raw RNA-seq sequence reads are available at the European Nucleotide Archive with accession 899
number ArrayExpress accession E-MTAB-5877. 900
Accession numbers: HvSLAC1 (Hordeum vulgare cultivar Barke); AtSLAC1 (Arabidopsis 901
thaliana Col-0) At1g12480; OsSLAC1 (Oryza sativa Japonica Group) XP_015636891; 902
SlSLAC1 (Solanum lycopersicum) XP_004245686; NtSLAC1 (Nicotiana tabacum) 903
XP_016515379; ZomSLAC1 (Zostera marina) KMZ58505; PdSLAC1 (Phoenix dactylifera) 904
XP_008780343.1; PpSLAC1 (Physcomitrella patens) PNR63146.1; CrSLAC1a (Ceratopteris 905
richardii) KT238910; SmSLAC1b (Selaginella moellendorffii) KU556809; AtOST1 906
(Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0) At4g33950; AtCPK6 (Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0) At2g17290; 907
AtABI1 (Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0) At4g26080. 908
Software and algorithms used in this study are listed in the KEY RESOURCES TABLE. In 909
addition, for graph preparations and statistical analysis the software Igor Pro7 (waveMetrics, 910
Inc., Lake Oswego, Oregon, USA), Excel (Microsoft Corp. Redmond, Washington, USA), 911
Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, California, USA) and CorelDRAW 912
(Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) was used. 913
Schäfer et al.
30
Supplemental tables 914
Table S1: Differentially expressed genes (DEG) in guard cell complexes (related to figure 915
S1). 916
Table S2: Selection of transcripts that are involved in stomatal movement (related to 917
figure S1). 918
Table S3: The top 50 amino acid residues that showed evolutionary coupling (EC) to 919
AtSLAC1 V272 and V273 are shown here (related to figure 4). 920
Table S4: Gene names, species and SLAC1 amino acid sequences that were used to build 921
alignments, frequency logos and phylogenetic trees (related to figure 4, figure S3 and S4). 922
Table S5: Oligos used in this study (related to figure S1 and METHODS DETAILS). 923