Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen 26 Nov 2009

41
Ethics and nanotechnology – aspects of democracy, legitimacy and sustainable development Farm Inn, 26 Nov 2009 Michael Søgaard Jørgensen The Science Shop c/o DTU Management Technical University of Denmark 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [email protected]

description

 

Transcript of Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen 26 Nov 2009

Page 1: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Ethics and nanotechnology – aspects of democracy,

legitimacyand sustainable development

Farm Inn, 26 Nov 2009

Michael Søgaard JørgensenThe Science Shop

c/o DTU Management Technical University of Denmark

2800 Kgs. Lyngby, [email protected]

Page 2: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Agenda

• Nanoethics => nanogovernance

• The nanochallenge

• A model for governance of nanotechnology– Deconstructing visions– Systems perspective on nanotechnologies– Life cycle assessment of nanotechnologies

• Organising nanogovernance

Page 3: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

From nanoethics to nanogovernance

• Ethics is about what is right and wrong• Ethics is about how we find out what is right and

wrong• Today ’governance’ is often used about how

issues are managed in a society• Ethical discussions tend to become about

personal commitment and blaming• ….but the relation between technology and

society is much more complex than that Nanogovernance

Page 4: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

4

The nanochallenge!

• Technologies are shaped – not given from nature

– We participate as researchers in the shaping

• Co-shaping of technology and society

– Technologies are not good or bad: which societal needs are addressed how

• Nanotechnologies are not smart and green

– Risks and potentials – shaped and assessed in a life cycle perspective

Page 5: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Many societal areas addressed with nanotechnologies

A. Nanotechnologies are enabling technologies=> claimed to be useful in almost all areas of the society => challenging many social areas

B. Research and development of nanotechnologies is a highly competitive area => big funds to compete for

C. Increased focus of universities on spin-off companies, patents etc. => confidentiality maybe a hindrance to public insight and scrutiny into the research

Page 6: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Hypes and hopes

• Nanoresearchers may feel they have to promise fast societal benefits from the research (Norwegian Research Council)

Hope => hype?

• Some nanoresearchers afraid of public dialogue…..Others interested…..To avoid the same critique as with genetic modification in food and agriculture

Page 7: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Co-shaping of technology and society (1)

• Few would probably disagree in the development and use of new systems of small sensors combining ICT and nanotechnology

• However....– NGO’s and researchers would object if the sensors

are used to change focus away from pro-active prevention of pollution at the source to clean-up when sensors report problems

• If we should believe nanosensors should solve the pollution problem....– ...the lack of data should have been the reason for

previous pollution.....

Page 8: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Co-shaping of technology and society (2)

Not a linear development from need to research to innovation to application

Not good or bad properties of technologies per se

What agenda(s) are built around a technology by who?

Page 9: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

9

Case: Changing agendas about genetic modified plants

• GM-researchers and companies pointed to pesticide resistant plants as – ‘An efficient agricultural strategy’

• NGOs pointed to– the risk of getting locked into a pesticide-dependent

track– the risk of transfer of genetic material coding for

pesticide resistance to other related plants– organic farming and its principles of controlling weeds

• Industry called GM ‘an environmental strategy’– Using less pesticides

• Practice: Some farmers use more pesticides with GMO-plants

Page 10: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Some environmental potentials and risks related to nanotechnology

Environmental potentials related to nanotechnology

Chemical synthesis can take place at “normal” pressure and temperature

Non-toxic catalysts

Nano-scale design of materials can increase speed and efficiency of processes

Environmental and health risks related to nanotechnology

Hazardous solvents used in the manufacturing of C60 molecules

Most nano-particles are not biodegradable

Nano-tubes have the same material characteristics as asbestos fibres

Page 11: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

The “nanochallenge” in short

The interests and the uncertainties are big

Need for focus on robust development with focus on democracy and legitimacy (Gibbons et al)

Avoid wasting money on solving (non-)-problems in un-sustainable ways – and thereby take away the focus from other and more legitimate problems and solutions

Avoid solving problems in a non-sustainable way

Page 12: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

12

A governance model based on integrated design

1) (De)construction of scripts and scenarios in research and development

2) Systems approach to nanotechnology3) Environmental assessments based on

dialogue and life cycle perspective• of visions about nanotechnologies• of design processes• of practice applying nanotechnologies

Page 13: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

(1) Deconstruction of scripts and scenarios in R&D visions

• A starting point in the problems, which a certain nanotechnology (area) - according to the researchers and/or designers - is supposed to solve.

• The overall questions to ask:

– By whom are the addressed problems recognised as problems?

– By whom is the suggested technological change recognised as an acceptable solution?

Page 14: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

OILFRESH (1)

• Problems addressed– French fries too fat– Heating too long– Oil disposal frequency

• ProductThe OilFresh device is already in use in a number of individual restaurants. Future clients: large fast-food chains such as KFC, McDonald’s, and Burger King.

• Advantages– Cut oil cost to half– Reduces cooking time & temperature– Gives healthier & better tasting fries

Page 15: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

OILFRESH (2)

• The OilFresh catalyst system is based on nanoparticle technology.

• Nanoceramic catalytic pellets are fused together to create a huge surface area on the catalyst surface.

• Extends the fry life of oils by reducing oxidative degradation

Students at Nanotechnology and society course, DTU, Jan 2008

Page 16: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Sociology of technology:Script and description

• Script: A kind of knowledge claim that lays out a program of action ’the designer’ (un-)consciously assume will be followed

– A manuscript for the role of the technology

• De-scription: the accept / resistance / modification of the inscribed to the script

– Is nano frying oil used for promoting healthy fried food?

– Can consumers manage not to eat more fried food?

Page 17: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Sociology of technology:Enrollment and translation

• How actors enroll other actors or non-humans into postions that suit their purposes

• How problems are translated to enable a solution with a certain technology– Fight obesity with nano enhanced frying oil– Fight bacterial problems with nano silver

Page 18: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Should we fight bacteria?

“The Silver Nano Health System is a comprehensive system developed by Samsung to improve your quality of life by eliminating bacteria from the places that count most.....Just as a dirty washer never truly cleans clothes… Samsung has found a solution in the safety of silver, ionizing silver into ions for an effective coating that lets your home appliances remain remarkably free of bacteria and odors. ”

Page 19: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Actor-networks around nano-silver (I)

• Group discussion:• Who are the humans and non-humans which

Samsung tries to enroll in a network around nano-silver on household equipment?

• What could be the problems with use of nanosilver?

Page 20: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Actor-networks around nano-silver (II)

• Governmental authorities and researchers are concerned about – Harming the waste water treatment facilities – Creating silver-resistant bacteria => reduce/prevent

the use of silver as a anti-microbial agent in the prevention of infections in serious burn-wounds

• Swedish governmental institutions are no longer allowed to buy nano-silver products

• Samsung has had to redraw at least one of their products from a country

Page 21: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Actor-networks around nano-silver (III)

• Technology push from nanotechnology companies – sometimes without knowledge about the product fields they want to sell to

• Technology pull from lowtech companies – e.g. within textiles - without knowledge about the nanotechnology and its working principles

Page 22: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

To make a technology ’work’ in a robust way

• Technological innovations must be supported by a corresponding evolution of social and institutional support and control– To avoid a widespread use of nanosilver– To avoid that fast food chains use a product like

Oilfresh to promote ’healthy fried food’ => a higher consumption of fried food

• Who should take of these uncertainties and when?

• What (manu)scripts are we as researchers part of (writing)?

Page 23: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Governance model (2): Systems’ approach to nanotechnology

• Should ensure that focus is – not only on single properties or features,

• for example the tiny dimensions of a nanotechnology,

– but the whole system, which a nanotechnology or a nanotechnology-based product is part of

• Including the need for supporting infrastructures like quality standards, waste (water) management systems etc.– E.g. facilities to treat the waste water from

households having nano silver products

Page 24: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Governance model (3): Env. assessment based on dialogue

and life cycle perspective• A life cycle approach...

– where not only the use of the technology, but also the manufacturing of it, the use and in the post-use phase are described and assessed.

• At the research and innovation stages – A life-cycle screening of possible future applications,– Based on the MECO-concept (Materials, Energy,

Chemicals, Others (Occupational Health and Safety etc.))

– Dialogue about ‘relevant’ environmental aspects and the possibilities for prevention

Page 25: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

25

The principle behind a life cycle inventory of a product

• The interaction between– Product– Actors– Systems/infrastructures/other products

….in the different links of the life cycle/product chain

• Follow the product through the possible, intended or actual life cycles

Page 26: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Nanospeed badminton racket in life cycle perspective

Nanospeed racket

Raw materials Production Use Disposal

Materials Fossil fuels Waste resin

Energy Vacuum pump Melting and curing

Chemicals Chlorinated and other solvents

Nanoparticles released from waste?

Other aspects, including occupational health and safety

Occupational handling of nanoparticles

Materials, Energy, Chemicals and Others matrix for the different life cycle stages of a “nanospeed” badminton racket.

Page 27: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Motor oil with nanoparticles in life cycle perspective

Oil lubricant Raw materials Production Use Disposal

Materials Fossil fuels

Energy Electricity Improved lubrication?

Chemicals Release of nanoparticles?

Nanoparticles released from waste?

Other aspects, including occupational health and safety

Occupational handling of nanoparticles

The Materials, Energy, Chemicals and Others matrix for the different life cycle stages of a motor oil.

Page 28: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Environmental potential from a nanotechnology-based product!?

(Steinfeldt et al., 2004)

CC = Car Coating

Steinfelt et al 2004: Globalwarming potential (kg CO2-equivalents per m2 coated surface

Page 29: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

29

Risk = hazard + exposure

Use/process (frequency, duration, amount)

Source: Poul Bo Larsen

•The properties making nanomaterials attractive, may be those that also make them hazardous:• High reactivity => highly reactive in the body• Organic solvents dissolve fat and dirt => damage the brain

Page 30: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Typology of nanomaterials(Hansen et al 2007)

Page 31: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

A general model for qualitative assessment of work environment

Assessment of:• The health impact from the chemical, material

etc.• The level of exposure (how closed is the system,

how much handling of the material, exposure during cleaning, accident etc.)

• The duration of exposure (everyday, often, seldom etc.)

• Description and maybe qualitative scores (1-3) => scores 1 - 27

Page 32: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

A general model for qualitative assessment of environment

Assessment of:• The environmental impact from the chemical,

material etc. • The level of disemination (how widespread use

of the product, how closed is the system, exposure during cleaning, accident etc.)

• The level of exposure (everyday, often, seldom etc.)

• Description and maybe qualitative scores (1-3) => scores 1 - 27

Page 33: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Reactions in lung alveoles from particles and nanoparticles

Nanoparticles released into the bloodBigger particles

easier digested by macrophages

Fine particlesUltrafine particles < 0.1. nm

Nano particles, environment and health. From Ecological Council (in Danish)

Page 34: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Environmental strategies

• Dilution

• End-of-pipe

• Cleaner technology

• Cleaner products

Page 35: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

35

Source reduction: Nanoparticles (1)

Product focus: inherently dispersive

• Surface modification: hydrophilic coating reduces inflammatory responses

• Quantum dots: coating of CdSe dots with ZnS or organic compounds reduces cytotoxicity

Page 36: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

36

Source reduction: Nanoparticles (2)

Product focus: not inherently dispersive:• What happens during cleaning, wear, tear and

corrosion• Release as original nanoparticles?• Release as larger aggregates?• No comparative studies with non-nano products• Experience with material design preventing

nanoparticle release could be useful

Page 37: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

37

Need for democratic governance

• Strategies for how and when different actor groups are given a voice in relation to science and technology and how decisions are made on issues of public concern:

Inclusiveness, democratic control, discursive quality

Page 38: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

38

Aspects of governance

• Openness vs. relevance of dialogue– How open is the agenda setting – How much is the dialogue related to

relevant decisions

• Inclusion vs. exclusion – of aspects and actors

• Legitimacy– of the problems addressed by

nanotechnology– of the solutions offered by nanotechnology– of other solutions to the problem

Page 39: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

: Case: NanoCap (“Nanotechnology

Capacity Building NGOs”)

• Deepen the understanding of environmental, occupational health and safety risks and ethical aspects of nanotechnology

• A structured discussion is organised between environmental NGOs, trade unions, academic researchers and other stakeholders

• www.nanocap.eu• Earlier project: Nanologue.net

Page 40: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Governance as an ongoing process

• Governance activities may have different types of results: – Increasing knowledge of the CSO and/or the

scientists (for example about technology, social impact or policy strategies),

– Developing new network relations between CSOs and researchers

– Developing actions, like • (re)framing a discourse, • social mobilisation • getting influence on a research strategy

Page 41: Ethics And Nanotech JøRgensen  26 Nov 2009

Room for democracy & legitimacy?

• Are researchers willing to engage in dialogue about the legitimacy of the problems and the sustainability of the solutions they are researching?

• Are governments willing to discuss research strategies with civil society organisations with focus on problems and not on specific technical solutions?