QF-71-02-13-1 Supplier APQP Workbook.xls

Supplier APQP Workbook

QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

Fundamentals-Introduction of 20

Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) Guideline

Fundamentals of the APQP Process

Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP)

The Goal of APQP

The Purpose of APQP

The Applicability of APQP

Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) is a structured method for defining and executing the actions necessary to ensure a product satisfies the customer. APQP is program and supplier-led and is required of all systems, subsystems and component manufacturing locations - as identified by Westport Supplier Plan and internal APQP procedure. This includes both internal and external suppliers to Westport.

The goal of APQP is to facilitate communication between all persons and activities involved in a program and ensure that all required steps are completed on time, with a high quality-of-event, at acceptable cost and quality levels.

Planning of Product Realization is a requirement per ISO/TS. Whether the supplier is ISO 9001 or ISO/TS 16949 certified, the supplier must plan and develop the processes needed for product realization.

In Planning of Product Realization following must be determined as appropriate:- Quality Objectives and Requirements for the product- The need to establish processes, documents, and resources specific to the product- Required verification, validation, monitoring, inspection and test activities specific to the product and the criteria for product and acceptance- Records needed to provide evidence that the realization processes and resulting product meets requirements

The APQP, as a reference, is a proposed Planning of Product Realization by AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group).

The Purpose of this workbook is to provide requirements and methodology to Westport's Suppliers towards effective implementation of the APQP activities.

All Programs under development that require new or modified components (as identified in the Westport Project Charter).It can be used at discretion of the Supplier Development Engineer (SDE) for:- any new manufacturing processes at Suppliers- Significant Product changes- Significant Process changes


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00


Teams

Responsibility

APQP Flow / Elements

1 APQP - Kick Off2 APQP - Product Design

3 APQP - Process Design

4 APQP - PPAP Readiness

5 APQP - Launch

The first step in the APQP Process is to assign responsibility to a cross-functional team. Effective product quality planning requires the involvement from all areas within a corporation. The team includes representatives from engineering, manufacturing, material control, purchasing, quality, sales, field service, subcontractors, and customers as appropriate.

The Supplier is responsible :- to develop and execute an APQP Plan for successful product launch The Suppliers is responsible for ensuring their subcontractors apply APQP methodology and integrating their subcontractors planning in their overall APQP plan- to assign resources to the cross-functional APQP team: - identifying the project team leader, core team members and internal and external customers - defining roles and responsibilities for the team members- to monitor the progress of the APQP and assure successful completion of all APQP elements on time

Westport is responsible:- to assign the SDE who shall audit/monitor the satisfactory completion of all applicable APQP activities described in this process- assign the Westport core team members in the different functions (e.g. Buyer)

The Westport APQP Process has five main functions and includes elements per AIAG Advanced Product Planning and Control Plan manual and Westport unique elements as appropriate.

The intent of the ‘APQP – Product Design’ review is for the Supplier to understand early enough all the technical specifications of the components supplied and agrees on the feasibility of these specifications.

The intent of the ‘APQP – Process Design’ review is to formalize Supplier progress on Process Development, understand early enough all the process requirements and documentation of these specifications.

The intent of the ‘APQP – PPAP Readiness’ review is to assure Supplier readiness for PPAP activities.

The intent of the ‘APQP – Launch’ review is to close out and document trough corrective actions any open action item with Supplier. Also to provide feedback on Performance and Lessons Learned during Project Implementation.


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00


Definitions / AcronymsAIAG Automotive Industry Action Group (www.aiag.org) APQP Advanced Product Quality PlanningBOM Bill of MaterialCC Critical Characteristic

COTS

DFMEA Design Failure Mode and Effects AnalysisDOE Design of ExperimentsDVP&R Design Verification Plan and ReportFMEA Failure Mode and Effects Analysis

MSA Measurement Systems Analysis

P.I.P.C. % Percentage of Inspection points that are Process Capable

P.I.S.T. % Percentage of Inspection points that Satisfy Tolerance

PFMEA Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis

PPAP Production Part Approval

PSW Parts Submission Warrant

QFD Quality Function Deployment

SC Significant Characteristics

SDE Supplier Development Engineer

SOP Start of Production

SPC Statistical Process Control

WPDP Westport Product Development Process

ReferencesISO 9001ISO/TS 16949AIAG (http://www.aiag.org)

Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan, APQP Production Part Approval Process, PPAPStatistical Process Control, SPC Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, FMEA Measurement Systems Analysis, MSA

WPDP - Westport Product Development Process

Custom of the Shelf, components that are supplier design responsibility and commonly available

Key Components

Components identified as Critical due to the complexity, cost and Lead Time during project development activities

Non Key Components

Custom components non critical due to the complexity, cost and Lead time during project development activities


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00


WPDP Stages, Gates and Timeline

STAGE 0:CONCEPT DEFINITION

STAGE 1:PLAN AND DEFINE

PROGRAM

CU

STO

ME

R, S

TATU

TOR

Y A

ND

RE

GU

LATO

RY

RE

QU

IRE

ME

NTS

STAGE 2:PRODUCT DESIGN AND

DEVELOPMENT VERIFICATION

STAGE 3:PROCESS DESIGN AND

DEVELOPMENT VERIFICATION

STAGE 4:PRODUCT AND PROCESS

VALIDATION

STAGE 5:FEEDBACK, ASSESSMENT AND

CORRECTIVE ACTION

GATE 2‘Alpha’ Build -

Prototype Initiation / Approval

“Design Verified”

GATE 1 Program

Initiation / Approval

”Contract”

GATE 0

ConceptInitiation / Approval

“Charter”

GATE 3 ‘Beta’ Build - Pilot

Initiation / Approval

“Process Verified”

GATE 4Launch Initiation

/ Approval

“Product & Process Validated”

GATE 5Program close

out

“CustomersSatisfied”

PLANNING

PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

PROCESS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

PRODUCT AND PROCESS VALIDATION

PRODUCTION

FEEDBACK ASSESSMENT AND CORRECTIVE ACTION

PR

OG

. M

GM

T.

Assign Core Team, Build Business Case & Charter

Finalize Contract, Lead & Manage Program

Lead & Manage Program

QU

ALI

TYLE

GA

L &

C

OM

PL

IAN

CE

FIN

AN

CE

CU

ST

OM

ER

C

AR

E

SU

PP

LY

CH

AIN

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

GS

ALE

S &

M

AR

KE

T D

EV

Choose Architecture and Preliminary Design & Modeling

Strategic Sourcing Requirements

Complete Financial & Funding Assessment

Refine Market Assessment & Customer Requirements &

Engage OEMs

Plan Customer Care

Design & Verify Against Specifications Through

Analysis and /or Engineering Prototypes

Supplier Development Plan Defined – Proto-Pdn. /

Supppliers APQP started

Project Budget & Finacial Business Case Tracking

Develop Service Infrastructure, Tools, Information & Training. Conduct Alpha Field Trials.

Build & Validate Production Intent Product & Processes

(Beta Build)

Supplier Readiness – Suppliers’ PPAP Complete

Validate Customer Reqs. & Work with OEMs

Validate Service Infrastructure, Tools, Information & Training.

Conduct Beta Field Trials

Assess Legal or Regulatory Risks

Facilitate & Continuous Improvement

Build & Verify Design Against Specifications (Alpha Build)

Supplier Process Development – Suppliers’

PPAP readiness

Refine Customer Requirements & Work with

OEMs

Set Pricing, Create Market Introduction Plan & Field Sales

Strategy

MFG

E

NG

.

Mfg Plan & Identify Special Process Char.

Phase Order Equipment and Prepare Facilities

Validate Operations Process Readiness

Install Mfg Processes.Control Plan. Build Alpha Prototypes.

Production

Supplier Launch & Feedback

E D L P

Pre-Alpha BuildE Level HW

Alpha Build “D” Level HW

Pre-Launch “L” Level HW

PPAP Run“P” Level HW

Sign offE D L P

Design Review

PPromotion – Drawing Level

CustomerSOP


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

Status Report Form of 20

Supplier: Date:

Location: Part No.:

Design Responsibility: Part Description:

Rev. No.:

00 01 02 03 04 05

APQP Revision:

Contact Directory

Team Members Company Title phone email

APQP Level: Reason for APQP:

APQP Timeline

Milestones Due Date Venue Comments

1 APQP - Kick-Off 0%

2 APQP - Product Design 0%

Feasibility signed (refer to 'Feasibility' tab)

3 APQP - Process Design 0%

4 APQP - PPAP Readiness 0%

5 APQP - Launch 0%

Total: 0%

Build Level Qty Promotion Dates

'E' - Pre-Alpha Prototype

'D' - Alpha Prototype

'L' - Pre-launch/Beta

PPAP Parts

'P' - Production Run Parts

PPAP Level: (refer to 'PPAP Checklist' tab)

APQP Status Report Form

Completion Date

Progress in %

Status G/Y/R

Delivery Date

A9

Fill in the date when APQP workbook is updated

A27

WPDP Stage 2 Design Development

A28

WPDP Stage 2 Design Development

A29

WPDP Stage 2 Design Development Feasibility needs to be signed latest after 2. APQP - Product Design is completed

F29

100% if signed without Conditions, otherwise 0%

A30

WPDP Stage 2 Design Development and WPDP Stage 3 Process Development

A31

WPDP Stage 4 Product and Process Validation 4.02 Ensure Production Supplier Development Status, PPAP Readiness 4.04 Supplier PPAP completed

A32

WPDP Stage 4 Product and Process Validation and WPDP Stage 5 Feedback, Assessment and Corrective Action

F35

Westport internal dates / for Westport use

A36

WPDP Stage 2 Design Development 2.14 Source and Procure Pre-Alpha Prototype Parts "E"

A37

WPDP Stage 3 Process Development 3.01 Procure Alpha Prototype Parts "D"

A38

WPDP Stage 4 Product and Process Validation 4.02 Ensure Production Supplier Development Status, PPAP Readiness 4.03 Procure Beta Parts "L" 4.04 Supplier PPAP completed

A39

WPDP Stage 4 Product and Process Validation 4.02 Ensure Production Supplier Development Status, PPAP Readiness 4.03 Procure Beta Parts "L" 4.04 Supplier PPAP completed

A40

WPDP Stage 4 Product and Process Validation 4.04 Supplier PPAP completed


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

Status Report Form Open Issues of 20

APQP Status Report Form / Open Issues - Task List

Date

# Issues and Actions Responsible Due revised Due Completed Comments / Observations

123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425

Status G/Y/R


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

1 Kick-Off of 20

1 Kick-Off Checklist

# Questions Status Due Date Comments

1

2 Is the NDA (Nondisclosure Agreement) signed?

3

4

5

6

7 Is there an action plan for any critical path issues?

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15 Does the supplier have a preliminary list of tier 2 suppliers?

PersonResponsible

Completion Date

Has the contact directory been completed with Westport & Supplier stakeholders from all functions?

Was a complete offer (including tool costs, parts price, transport and packaging, lead times, etc) submitted to Westport?

Are all APQP reviews planned and do they match component milestones?

Are there sufficient personnel identified to cover all APQP activities (e.g. engineering testing, Control plan requirements, problem solving ,…)?

Have the main Westport project milestones been communicated to the supplier (drawing release/ APQP reviews/ Prototype builds/tooling release/PPAP/ SOP)? Are they included in the APQP time plan?

Has supplier got from Westport the latest version of the Technical Requirements and/or functional Specifications?

Were the forecasted production and service volumes communicated?

Is the supplier aware of Westport APQP, PPAP and Quality instructions?

Is forecasted volume for prototypes, pre-production and serial production communicated to the supplier?

Does the supplier get all necessary inputs from Westport? If no, list the missing elements.

If the project requires new equipment and/or new tooling, is there a preliminary list of new equipment and/or new tooling?

Is a preliminary BOM (Bill of material) for sub-contracted parts available?


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

1 Kick-Off of 20


# Questions Status Due Date CommentsPerson

ResponsibleCompletion

Date

16

17 Will the supplier perform a APQP with tier 2 suppliers?

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 Is there an appropriate Lot Traceability system?28 Does the supplier have IMDS submission capabilities?

29

30

31

Total yes: 0Total no: 0

Total n/a: 0

Are the intended tier 2 Suppliers in compliance with at least ISO 9001?

Will the supplier perform a APQP for own production parts (e.g. major assembly)?

Does the supplier have a traceability process related to special characteristics (ISO9001 7.3.2.1)?

Does the supplier have a preliminary list of Special Characteristics?

Has the supplier reviewed the technical data and signed the Feasibility Commitment?

Has the supplier capacity to provide DFMEA using AIAG FMEA Reference Manual?

Does the supplier have an appropriate Design/Process Change System that ensures traceability of every change?

Has the supplier reviewed the technical specifications for any required in-process testing (e.g. leakage testing)?

Has the supplier evaluated if there are any in-process testing needed based on his experience?

Do you have included in your investment plan equipment related to 'in-process' testing?

Does the supplier have the capacity to provide robust Control plan using AIAG APQP Reference Manual and/or equivalent?

Does the supplier understand the requirements for PPAP per AIAG requirements?

Which PPAP Level is required? Please specify on Status Report Form. And is the supplier fully aware of the acceptance criteria for PPAP?


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

1 Kick-Off of 20




Date

Progress: 0%


QF-71-02-13-1REV 00

2 Product Design of 20

2 Product Design


Suppliers with Design/Development responsibility only

1

2

3 Have similar part SFMEA / DFMEAs been considered?

4

5

6

7

8

9 Are design reviews planned?

10

11 Has Design of Experiments (DoE) been considered?12 Has DFMEA been completed?13 Has the Design Verification Plan been considered?

14

15 Have Special Characteristics been selected?16 Is Bill of Material complete?17 Was a DFMEA review performed by Westport?

All Suppliers ('E'-parts / Pre-Alpha)

18

19

20

PersonResponsible

Completion Date

Was the SFMEA (System FMEA) and/or DFMEA prepared using the AIAG Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) reference manual?

Have historical campaign and warranty data been reviewed?

Does the SFMEA / DFMEA identify Special Characteristics?

Have design characteristics that affect high risk priority failure modes been identified?

Have appropriate corrective actions been assigned to high risk priority numbers?

Have appropriate corrective actions been assigned to high severity numbers?

Have risk priorities been revised when corrective actions have been completed and verified?

Do the design reviews include design targets, quality targets, reliability, costs and due dates?

Are all specified tests, methods, equipment and acceptance criteria clearly defined and understood?

Are drawings and specifications available for Pre-Alpha Prototypes ('E'-parts)?

Was a Pre-Alpha Prototype Control Plan prepared? ('E'-parts)

Was the Pre-Alpha Prototype Control Plan communicated and approved by Westport? ('E'-parts)


QF-71-02-13-1REV 00

2 Product Design of 20

2 Product Design



Date

21

22

23

All Suppliers ('D'-parts / Alpha)

24

25 Was a Alpha Prototype Control Plan prepared? ('D'-parts)

26

27

28

29

30

31


Total n/a: 0Progress: 0%

Are all special product/process characteristics included in the Pre-Alpha Prototype Control Plan? ('E'-parts)

Are gages and test equipment available as required by the Pre-Alpha Prototype Control Plan? ('E'-parts)

Are gage methods compatible between supplier and Westport?

Are drawings and specifications available for Alpha Prototypes ('D'-parts)?

Was the Alpha Prototype Control Plan communicated and approved by Westport? ('D'-parts)

Are all special product/process characteristics included in the Alpha Prototype Control Plan? ('D'-parts)

Are gages and test equipment available as required by the Alpha Prototype Control Plan? ('D'-parts)

Are gage methods compatible between supplier and Westport?

Does the process flow chart illustrate the sequence of production and inspection?

Does the supplier perform capability studies for the existing processes? And are the machine/process capabilities for new equipment forecasted?


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

Feasibility of 20

Team Feasibility Commitment / Supplier Design Review

Date:Supplier: Part No.:Location: Part Name:

Rev. No.:

Review Considerations:

YES NO ConsiderationsIs the product adequately defined (application requirements, etc.) to enable feasibility evaluation?Can Engineering Performance Specifications be met as written?Can product be manufactured to tolerances specified on drawing?Can product be manufactured with Cpk's that meet requirements?Is there adequate capacity to produce product?Does the design allow the use of efficient material handling techniques?Is the product adequately defined to enable feasible measuring?Can product be manufactured without incurring any unusual:

- Costs for capital equipment?- Costs for tooling?- Alternative manufacturing methods?

Is statistical process control required on product?Is statistical process control presently used on similar products?Where statistical process control is used on similar products:

- Are the processes in control and stable?- Are Cpk's greater than 1.67?

Are special / uncommon materials required that are not readily available?

Conclusion:Feasible > Product can be produced as specified with no revisions.Feasible (Conditional)Not Feasible > Design revision required to produce product within the specified requirements.

Issue # Issues / Comments / Risks Corrective Actions / Resolution Plan

Name Title Date Signature

ME and supplier product quality planning team has considered the following questions, not intended to be all-inclusive in performing a feasibility evaluation. The drawings and / or specifications provided have been used as a basis for analyzing the ability to meet all specified requirements. All "no" answers are supported with attached comments identifying our concerns and proposed changes to enable us to meet the specified requirements.

Is the appropriate packaging available to protect the product during shipment? (Provide a proposal)

> Changes recommended (see issues list below).

Supplier Sign-Offs: (there is minimum a sign off from Engineering, Quality and Production required)


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

3 Process Design of 20

3 Process Design


Drawings, Feasibility and SPC characteristics

1

2

3

4

5

6

Process FMEA

7

8

9

New Equipment and Tooling

10

11

12

13

PersonResponsible

Completion Date

Are drawings and specifications available for Pre-Launch/Production parts ('L/P'-parts)?

Has the supplier reviewed the technical data and signed the Feasibility Commitment? Are any updates required?

Have the SPC characteristics been defined/updated and do they comply with the current drawing?

If necessary, have SPC characteristics been communicated to tier 2 suppliers?

Can all dimensions and tolerances be manufactured and monitored in a process capable manner?

Are all necessary standards and Westport specifications available and released?

Was the Process FMEA prepared by a cross functional team?

Have all operations including subcontracted, or outsourced processes and services been considered in the Process FMEA?

Have all operations affecting customer requirements including fit, function, durability, governmental regulations and safety been identified and listed sequentially in the Process FMEA?

Have lists been prepared identifying the progress of new equipment, tooling, test equipment?

Have orders been placed for new equipment, tooling, test equipment?

Have lists been prepared identifying the progress of new equipment, tooling, test equipment at tier 2 suppliers?

Have orders been placed for new equipment, tooling, test equipment at tier 2 suppliers?


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00


3 Process Design



Date

Process Flow Chart

14

15

Control Plan

16

17

18

19

20

21 If required, has the customer approved the control plan?

22

Resources, Training, Operator and Inspection Instructions

23

24

25

26 Do operator instructions include pictures and diagrams?

Has a process flow chart been developed and it illustrates the entire process from receiving through shipping, including outside processes and services?

Have lean concepts been applied in considering material flow?

Were DFMEA, and PFMEA used to prepare the control plan, to identify specific characteristics that may be critical?

Is the flow chart keyed to product and process checks in the control plan and PFMEA?

Is each operation provided with process instructions that are keyed to the control plan?

Are all special product/process characteristics included in the control plan?

Were DFMEA, and PFMEA used to prepare the control plan?

Are gage methods compatible between supplier and customer?

Are there sufficient qualified personnel identified to cover:- Control Plan requirements?- Layout inspections? - Engineering performance testing?- Problem reaction and resolution analysis?- Quality liaison with Westport?- Quality liaison with tier 2 suppliers?

Is the skill matrix for manufacturing operations available and updated?

Are standard operator instructions accessible at each work station?


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00


3 Process Design



Date

27

28

29

30

31

32

Equipment Feasibility and Preliminary Process Capability Studies

33

34

35

36

37

Were operator/team leaders involved in developing standard operator instructions?

Do inspection instructions include:Easily understood engineering performance specifications?

Do inspection instructions include:- Test frequencies?- Sample sizes?- Reaction plans?- Documentation requirements?

Are visual aids:- Appropriate, easily understood and legible?- Available?- Accessible?- Approved?- Dated and current?

Are all operators trained on the operator and inspections instructions?

Is there an emergency plan? (e.g. for key machine or tooling breakdown; if the company is in a tornado, earthquake, flood area, etc.; can the supplier be reached after hours for urgent (replacement) orders; etc)

Will a preliminary capability study be conducted at the tooling and/or equipment manufacturer?

Will preliminary process capability studies be run at the processing plant?

Has test equipment feasibility and accuracy been established?

Is a preventive maintenance plan complete for equipment and tooling?

Are setup instructions for new equipment and tooling complete and understandable?


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00


3 Process Design



Date

Capacity

38

39 Is testing capacity sufficient to provide adequate testing?

40 Can the forecasted production volumes be met?

41 Can all dates per project schedule be met?



Does the manufacturing equipment have sufficient capacity to handle forecasted production and service volumes?


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

4 PPAP Readiness of 20

4 PPAP Readiness


1 Is the APQP and project time plan updated?

2 Are risks associated to the project identified and updated?

3

4

5

6 Has training been completed for new processes/machines?

7 Is the skill matrix updated and available?

8

9 Is the Run at Rate scheduled?

10

11

12

13

14 Are Tier 2 PPAP's completed without any open deviations?

15

16

17

18

19 Is Supplier ready for PPAP submission on schedule?Total yes: 0Total no: 0


PersonResponsible

Completion Date

Are the final Process Flow, PFMEA, Floor Plan and Control Plan available?

Are the final Gauges, Tooling and Equipment ordered and will arrive on time?

Is the final Measurement System Analysis planned and agreed upon?

Does the Supplier have a Production Capacity and Ramp up Plan?

Is the process and flow for non conforming product adequate to prevent use of these parts in production?

Has packaging been considered and approved by Westport if applicable?

Have all special characteristics been identified in the future process and are these special characteristics identified in the Control Plan?

Has the PPAP Checklist been reviewed and agreed upon by Supplier and Westport?

Is there an action plan for any open deviations on Tier 2 PPAP's?

Are Tier 2 capacities secured according to Supplier and Westport capacity planning?

Has material data sheet been submitted in the IMDS system?

Has material data sheet in the IMDS system been accepted by Westport?


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

5 Launch of 20

5 Launch


1 Is the PSW completed according to PPAP manual?2 Is there an action plan for remaining PPAP deviations?

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 Is Supplier ready for SOP?Total yes: 0Total no: 0


PersonResponsible

Completion Date

Has the supplier informed Westport about any changes that have occurred after PPAP submission? (If there were changes, please note in the comment column.)

If there were any changes, is the new PPAP submission scheduled?

Has the Run at Rate been performed and the results in terms of quality and capacity are acceptable?

Have process capabilities been confirmed and are acceptable after the Run at Rate?

Has the supplier performed a final process audit of the final serial process?

Is there an action plan for deviations found during the final process audit and/or corrective actions already implemented?

Were PPAP parts shipped in the approved packaging? Were there any problems with the packaging?


QF-71-02-13-1Rev 00

PPAP Checklist of 20

PPAP Submission ChecklistAll documents must be submitted in Westport accepted format

SUPPLIER 0

PART NUMBER #VALUE! REVISION #VALUE!

PART DESCRIPTION #VALUE! Level 1

PREPARED BY DATE Level 2

SUBMISSION LEVEL (choose from drop down menu) Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

Submission Element Approved Rejected Comments / Actions

Checklist Issue and Receipt Sign-offs

Print Name Signature Date

Supplier Receipt Confirmation and Agreement

Submission Requirement

Initial for Westport

Compliance

1. Design Record Print/Drawing or Specification

2. Engineering Change Notice Approved SRDC

3. Customer Engineering Approval Approved Westport signature on supplier drawing

4. Design FMEA For supplier designed part, if required by Westport

5. Process Flow Diagram Manufacturing process flow for part

6. Process FMEA Manufacturing analysis for product line

7. Control Plan Required for specific manufacturing plan of part

8. MSA Necessary when process capability is required

9. Dimensional Results Record of inspection to print features

10. Material / Performance Result For specific test results or certification as instructed on print

11. Initial Process Study Required if classified characteristics are noted on print

12. Qualified Laboratory Documentation As defined by Westport

13. Appearance Approval Report When required by Westport

14. Sample Production Parts Production representative sample

15. Master Sample Retain for 30 days after PPAP Approval

16. Checking Aids Document special gauges or fixtures to validate sample

17. Record of Compliance For Westport specific requirements.

18. Part Submission Warrant Approved Westport version required

Issued By: (Westport SDE)

Reviewed By: (Westport SDE)

APQP Workbook

document.xls DATA of 20

Back to Index

QF-71-02-13-1 Supplier APQP Workbook.xls

Documents

Transcript of QF-71-02-13-1 Supplier APQP Workbook.xls