Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.
-
Upload
judith-morris -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.
![Page 1: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Prioritizing Booster Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Pump Station ImprovementsImprovements
Prioritizing Booster Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Pump Station ImprovementsImprovements
Tom Peters, P.E.May 2, 2008
![Page 2: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
City of Bellevue City of Bellevue WBPS Evaluation OverviewWBPS Evaluation Overview
▼ Owns and operates 23 major water booster pump stations
▼ Pumped water service for over 60% of customers
▼ First overall technical evaluation of all pumping facilities and equipment
![Page 3: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
City of BellevueCity of BellevueWBPS Evaluation Project GoalsWBPS Evaluation Project Goals
▼ Efficient distribution of maintenance dollars Identify facilities whose failure significantly
impacts system reliability Rank WBPS in order of needed
improvement Develop costs to upgrade and Improve
WBPS reliability Asset management “building block”
![Page 4: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
City of BellevueCity of BellevueWBPS Evaluation HistoryWBPS Evaluation History
▼ Grown from merger and assumption of old water districts
▼ Some facilities developer constructed ▼ Historically wholesale water purchase
from City of Seattle ▼ Member of Cascade Water Alliance
![Page 6: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
City of Bellevue WBPS Evaluation City of Bellevue WBPS Evaluation Project ChallengesProject Challenges
▼ Multiple pump types▼ Varying levels of
building quality▼ Below grade vaults ▼ Inefficient location of
emergency power ▼ Absence of re-
chlorination facilities
![Page 7: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
City of Bellevue WBPS Evaluation City of Bellevue WBPS Evaluation Project ChallengesProject Challenges
![Page 8: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Pump Station Information and Data
▼ Thorough review of as-builts, maintenance records, water production and previous studies
▼ Analysis of peak and average day consumption, by pump station and operating zone.
▼ Rigorous assessment of each pump station condition, with video taped operator interview
▼ Development of 10 system schematics summarizing basic system information
![Page 9: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Ranking Pump StationsRanking Pump Stations
Ranking Ranking WBPS NeedsWBPS Needs
PairedPairedComparisonComparisonNormal OperationNormal Operation
Paired Paired ComparisonComparison
Emergency OperationEmergency Operation
![Page 11: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Ranking Evaluation Criteria
![Page 12: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Pump Station Score Card
![Page 13: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Normal Operating Ranking
49.154.4 56.9 58.6 58.6
63.1 64.7 65.2 65.4 67.4 69.1 71.5 73.8 74.8 75.980.6 82.9 83.3 84.3 84.1
88.595.5
0.0
10.020.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
Sc
ore
(0
to
10
0)
![Page 14: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Ranking Pump StationsRanking Pump Stations
Ranking Ranking WBPS NeedsWBPS Needs
PairedPairedComparisonComparisonNormal OperationNormal Operation
Paired Paired ComparisonComparison
Emergency OperationEmergency Operation
![Page 15: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
City of Bellevue WBPS Evaluation City of Bellevue WBPS Evaluation Risk Based AssessmentRisk Based Assessment
▼ Risk =
Hazard Probability X Vulnerability X Consequence▼ Hazards impacting multiple facilities pose the
greatest risk Regional power outage Earthquake Flooding
▼ Redundancy, properly placed, provides effective mitigation
![Page 16: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Sample Risk RankingSample Risk Ranking
0
100
0 50 100 150
Consequence of Failure Score
Lik
eli
ho
od
of
Fai
lure
Per
cen
t
LowestRisk
PumpStations
HighestRisk
PumpStations
![Page 17: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Emergency Operating Scenario
31.139.1 42.2
46.7 49.8 52.0 55.6 56.0 56.4 60.0 60.0 63.1 64.0 64.4 64.4 64.4 65.3
74.2 77.881.8
91.196.9
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
Sc
ore
(0
to
10
0)
![Page 18: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Combined Rankings
![Page 19: Prioritizing Booster Pump Station Improvements Tom Peters, P.E. May 2, 2008.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/56649f335503460f94c503af/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SUMMARYSUMMARY
▼WBPS assessed: 23▼WBPS requiring improvements: 21 ▼Total cost all improvements: 21.4 M▼Average cost of replacement (5): 2.9 M ▼Average cost of improvements (16): 0.43 M