Prioritization 4.0 (P4.0) Local Input Points · 2016. 2. 12. · November 2015-March 2016...
Transcript of Prioritization 4.0 (P4.0) Local Input Points · 2016. 2. 12. · November 2015-March 2016...
February 11, 2016 MPO & TCC Workshop
Prioritization 4.0 (P4.0) Local Input Points
Overview
1. • Review CRTPO’s Local Input Point Methodology
2. • Discuss Public Involvement Strategy
for P4.0 Local Input Point Allocation Periods
3. • Case Studies of Local Input Points
Methodology using Prioritization 3.0 projects
Action Requested at March 16 MPO Meeting
P4.0 General Assumptions
SPOT* office requires each MPO develop local input points methodology with at least one quantitative , one qualitative & public involvement component
CRTPO & both NCDOT Divisions each receive 2,500 points for Regional Impact & Division Needs tiers - Use all points allocated to CRTPO
NCDOT will calculate P4.0 scores for all
projects
CRTPO assigns points in increments of ‘100’ per project unless the
project crosses into another MPO * NCDOT Strategic Prioritization
Office of Transportation (SPOT)
November 2015-March 2016
• NCDOT-SPOT office scores all P4.0 Projects • CRTPO to review its local input point methodology • CRTPO to develop public involvement strategy for local
input points allocation
April-May 2016
• NCDOT opens 60-Day Regional Impact Local Input Points Window
• CRTPO will assign local points to Regional Impact projects o Local jurisdictions to consider local contributions
August-September 2016
• NCDOT opens 60-Day Division Needs Local Input Points Window
• CRTPO will assign local points to Division Needs projects o Local jurisdictions to consider local contributions
December 2016: NCDOT releases DRAFT 2018-2027 STIP
CRTPO Public
Comment Period(s) on Points
Assignment
Local Points Allocation Options
Option A Option B Option C
Point Allocation Period(s)
2 Periods: Allocate points separately to
Regional and Division Needs tiers
2 Periods: Allocate points separately to
Regional and Division Needs tiers
1 Period: Allocate points to both
Regional and Division tiers during first
window in April - May
Public Comment Period
2 Periods: April/May; July/August (14-27
days)
1 Period: April/May (14-27 days)
1 Period: April/May (14-27 days)
Pros Keep options open on
assigning Division Needs points
Keep options open on assigning Division
Needs points
Simplify the process; reduce confusion
Cons
Confusion about project tier
classification during public comment
Confusion about project tier
classification during point assignment
Lose out on opportunity to
account for cascading
Pro: More time for staff to compile the final public comments received before TCC meeting
Pro: TCC will have an opportunity to review summary of public comments prior to taking action
Con: Length of time is not consistent with prior public involvement efforts
Pro: Closer to preferred period for public involvement Con: TCC will not be able to consider final public
comment list when taking action. Con: Length of time is not consistent with prior public
involvement efforts
14-20 Day Public
Comment Period
21-27 Day Public
Comment Period
Length of Public Involvement Period
SPOT has reduced the local input point allocation windows from 90 to 60 days in P4.0.
MPO Actions on P4.0 Items in 2016
Approve P4.0 Local Input Points Methodology & determine Public Involvement Strategy
Request to open a public involvement period on “draft” allocation of local input points to Regional Impact and/or Division projects
Request to approve the local input points allocations to Regional Impact and/or Division Needs projects
March 16 MPO Meeting
May 18 MPO Meeting
April 20 MPO Meeting
Based upon Staff Recommendation of Option C:
Methodology Revisions
SPOT office does not require changes to MPO methodologies for P4.0
P4.0 Local Points Methodology did not change - P3.0 Methodology successfully identified
competitive projects funded by STIP
MPOs can make minor changes without board
approval
Significant changes to methodology would require SPOT office
approval, MPO approval, & public comment period
Methodology Steps
Project Screening
Revenue Assumptions => Division of Points by Mode
Proposed Criteria
Highway Points Assignment
Non-Highway Points Assignment
Public Involvement Process during Assignment
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Step 1. Project Screening
A. Divide projects into highway vs. non-highway
B. Categorize Projects by STI Funding Tier (Division needs tier or regional impact tier)
C. Identify project with lowest P4.0 score that can be funded based upon assumptions ▫ Total available Funds per tier by NCDOT
Step 2. Current Criteria
Highway Projects Priority
Non-Highway Projects Priority
If project in 2040 MTP ▫ MTP horizon year ▫ MTP score
If no MTP score available
▫ P4.0 score
▫ P4.0 score Regardless of mode
Revenue Assumptions & Division of Points by Mode
Regional Impact 2,500 Total Points 15% of local points to non-highway ▫ MPO assumption to allocate 15% of anticipated revenues to non-highway Regional Impact projects
2,200 points for highway projects
300 points for non-highway
projects
Division Needs 2,500 Total Points 20% of local points to non-highway ▫ MPO assumption to allocate 20% of anticipated revenues to non-highway Division Needs projects
2,000 points for highway projects
500 points for non-highway
projects
Step 3.
P4.0 Highway Project Inventory
STI Tier Number of Projects Available Local Input Points from SPOT (in increments of 100)
Region E (Mecklenburg and Union Counties)
18 22
Region F (Iredell) 8
Division 10 (Mecklenburg and Union Counties)
22 20
Division 12 (Iredell) 1
Note: In P3.0, CRTPO had 86 projects in the Regional Impact and Division Needs tiers
Step 4. Highway Points Assignment
P4.0 subcommittee uses scores from criteria in Step 2
Coordination with NCDOT Divisions 10 & 12
MPO Input – ▫ Final project list using methodology ▫ Public comments on preliminary point
assignments will be presented Elements of Highway Point Assignment
Step 5. Non-Highway Points Assignment
Use P4.0 score to prioritize projects
Attempt to assign one allocation of local points to each mode with a P4.0 project
Regional Impact Tier (300 Points for two projects)
1 Transit & 1 Rail project ▫ Reallocate remaining 100
points to Regional Impact tier highway project
Division Needs Tier (500 points for 45 Projects)
Each Aviation, Rail, Transit & Bike/Ped project with
highest P4.0 score ▫ Reallocate remaining 100
points to highest scoring non-highway project
Public Involvement Process during Assignment Step 6.
Minimum two-week public comment period(s) for citizens to review draft local input point assignment
Information to share Methodology posted to website(www.crtpo.org) Quantitative scores from SPOT office shared with
TCC, MPO board & posted to website Final allocation of local input points & public
comment summary posted to website
MPO board’s final action regarding local input point allocation may be based upon comments received
Recommendations to MPO
Endorse Public involvement strategy
Endorse Local Input Points Methodology
(unchanged from P3.0)
1 public comment period vs.
2 public comment periods (One period each for
Regional & Division point assignment periods)
1. Project Screening 2. Proposed Criteria 3. Revenue Assumptions =>
Division of Points by Mode 4. Highway Points Assignment 5. Non-Highway Points
Assignment 6. Public Involvement Process
during Assignment
Action items at March 16 MPO meeting
Prioritization 3.0 (P3.0) Local Input Point Case Studies
Midnight Lane/Oates Road Overpass
* New grade separation across I-77 in Mooresville *
▫ Submitted for P3.0 in 2014 ▫ P3.0 Division Needs tier
score 35.81 out of 50 ▫ CRTPO & Division 12 applied
local input points
▫ 2040 MTP fiscally constrained project list
▫ 2040 MTP composite score 155/200
▫ $9.5M cost estimate & high scores made project competitive for funding in Division 12
Result: Project programmed
in 2016-2025 STIP for right-of-way in 2019 & construction in 2021 Project committed
with no future prioritization (Right of way occurs prior to 2021)
Midnight Lane/Oates Road Overpass
* Widen roadway from Toddville Rd to I-485 in Charlotte*
NC 27/Freedom Drive Widening
▫ Submitted for P1.0 in 2009 ▫ P3.0 Reginal Impact tier
score 17.95 out of 70 ▫ CRTPO & Division 10 did not
apply local input points
▫ Not on 2040 MTP fiscally constrained project list
▫ 2040 MTP composite score 79/200
▫ $33M cost estimate & low scores made project not competitive for funding in Region E
Result: Project not
programmed in 2016-2025 STIP Project being
resubmitted for scoring in P4.0 with revised project limits
NC 27/Freedom Drive Widening
* Convert roadway to include bike lanes from North Tryon St to The Plaza/Parkwood Ave in Charlotte*
Matheson Avenue Bike Lane
▫ Submitted for P3.0 in 2014 ▫ P3.0 Division Needs tier
score 36.05 out of 50 ▫ CRTPO & Division 10 applied
local input points
▫ $400K cost estimate & high score made project competitive for funding in Division 10
Result: Project programmed
in 2016-2025 STIP for preliminary engineering in 2017 & construction in 2018 Project committed
with no future prioritization (Right of way occurs prior to 2021)
Matheson Avenue Bike Lane