Pier 27 Cruise Terminal Conceptual Site Planning Study · 2020-01-06 · 6 Pier 27 Cruise Terminal...
46
Pier 27 Cruise Terminal Conceptual Site Planning Study Summary Report prepared for: Port of San Francisco by: BAE and EDAW/AECOM February 2, 2008
Transcript of Pier 27 Cruise Terminal Conceptual Site Planning Study · 2020-01-06 · 6 Pier 27 Cruise Terminal...
Pier
27
Cru
ise
Term
inal
C
once
ptua
l Si
te P
lann
ing
Stud
y
Su
mm
ary
Re
po
rt
prep
ared
for:
Por
t of S
an F
ranc
isco
by: B
AE a
nd E
DAW
/AEC
OM
Febr
uary
2, 2
008
1
Intr
odu
ctio
n
Sc
ope
Sum
mar
y
6
Back
grou
nd
8
Pr
oces
s
9
2
Site
An
alys
is a
nd
Des
ign
Cri
teri
a
Pr
elim
inar
y D
evel
opm
ent
Crite
ria
12
U
rban
Con
text
13
Pi
er 2
7 El
evat
ion
Chan
ge
16
Ex
istin
g St
ruct
ures
16
St
ruct
ural
& S
eism
ic C
onst
rain
ts
18
Traf
fi c
21
Te
rmin
al B
uild
ing
Requ
irem
ents
24
Pu
blic
Ope
n Sp
ace
26
3
C
once
ptu
al S
ite
Pla
n A
lter
nat
ives
O
ptio
n 1
30
Opt
ion
2
34
Traf
fi c C
once
pt
38
Ope
n Sp
ace
Char
acte
r
39
Arch
itect
ural
Cha
ract
er
42
4
Nex
t St
eps
45
A
PP
END
ICES
TA
BL
E O
F C
ON
TE
NT
S
Sum
mar
ies
of W
orks
hop
1 &
2 a
re
avai
labl
e as
a s
epar
atel
y bo
und
repo
rt.
5C
on
ce
ptu
al
Sit
e P
lan
nin
g S
tud
y
SCO
PE S
UM
MAR
Y
6
BACK
GRO
UN
D
8
PRO
CESS
9
1 |
IN
TR
OD
UC
TI
ON
6P
ier
27
Cru
ise
Te
rmin
al
In
2007
, th
e C
ruis
e Te
rmin
al
Adv
isor
y Pa
nel
reco
mm
ende
d Pi
er 2
7 as
the
mos
t co
st-eff e
ctiv
e an
d op
erat
iona
lly-effi
cien
t pri
mar
y cr
uise
term
inal
lo
catio
n on
th
e Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
wat
erfr
ont.
A
cons
ulta
nt te
am le
ad b
y BA
E, a
nd in
clud
ing
EDA
W,
DM
JM D
esig
n, P
orts
and
Mar
itim
e G
roup
, C
HS,
an
d Ro
bin
Chi
ang
& C
ompa
ny w
as e
ngag
ed in
200
8 by
the
Por
t of
San
Fra
ncis
co. T
he t
eam
was
ask
ed
to u
nder
take
con
cept
ual
site
pla
nnin
g fo
r Pi
er 2
7,
inte
grat
ing
two
prog
ram
us
es: fi r
st,
the
crui
se
faci
lity
incl
udin
g a
term
inal
bui
ldin
g, d
ock
side
fa
cilit
ies,
par
king
, an
d ve
hicu
lar
circ
ulat
ion;
and
se
cond
, the
Nor
thea
st W
ater
fron
t Pla
za a
s a
publ
ic
open
spa
ce.
The
Port
’s go
al i
s to
dev
elop
a w
orld
-cla
ss h
ome
port
cru
ise
term
inal
at P
ier 2
7 th
at:
refl e
cts
the
valu
es o
f Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
resi
dent
s
and
the
city
’s le
ader
ship
mee
ts
indu
stry
st
anda
rds
for
meg
a-cr
uise
ship
sis
cos
t-eff e
ctiv
e
mee
ts c
omm
unity
and
regu
lato
ry re
quir
emen
ts Fo
llow
ing
two
one-
day
wor
ksho
ps w
ith p
ort
staff
an
d cr
uise
indu
stry
stak
ehol
ders
, ED
AW
dev
elop
ed
two
cons
olid
ated
site
pla
n al
tern
ativ
es, d
elin
eatin
g cr
uise
term
inal
con
fi gur
atio
n an
d in
teri
or p
rogr
am,
open
spa
ce c
onfi g
urat
ion,
and
veh
icul
ar c
ircu
latio
n fl o
ws.
The
se w
ere p
rese
nted
to th
e Por
t Com
mis
sion
on
Oct
. 28,
200
8. C
omm
ents
fro
m t
he p
ublic
wer
e al
so re
ceiv
ed.
PIER
29
Sansome St
Battery St
PIER
23
SCO
PE S
UM
MAR
Y
1 |
intr
oduc
tion
SITE
CO
NTE
XT P
LAN
PRO
JECT
STU
DY
AREA
PIER
27
Embe
rcade
ro
7C
on
ce
ptu
al
Sit
e P
lan
nin
g S
tud
y
PIER
27
EMBE
RCA
DER
O S
TREE
T
LOM
BARD
ST
REE
T
PIER
29
TEAT
RO
ZI
NAN
NI
SOCC
ERFI
ELD
PIER
29
BELT
LIN
E O
FFIC
E AN
NEX
PIER
27
ANN
EX
1 |
intr
oduc
tion
VIEW
EAS
T FR
OM
TEL
EGRAP
H H
ILL
TO S
ITE
8P
ier
27
Cru
ise
Te
rmin
al
The S
an F
ranc
isco
Cru
ise T
erm
inal
has
had
seve
ral
alte
rnat
ive d
evel
opm
ent p
ropo
sals
put
forw
ard
in
rece
nt y
ears
. In
an
eff o
rt to
cla
rify
the
pref
erre
d de
velo
pmen
t app
roac
h, th
e Po
rt o
f San
Fra
ncis
co
esta
blis
hed
the C
ruis
e Ter
min
al A
dvis
ory
Pane
l in
Janu
ary
2007
. The
Pan
el’s
mis
sion
was
to ev
alua
te
the
nece
ssity
of
a ne
w p
rim
ary
crui
se t
erm
inal
, de
term
ine
its v
alue
to S
an F
ranc
isco
, rec
omm
end
whe
re t
he n
ew t
erm
inal
sho
uld
be lo
cate
d, a
nd
fi nal
ly, w
hat s
teps
sho
uld
be ta
ken
to im
plem
ent
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f a c
ruis
e te
rmin
al p
roje
ct. T
he
Adv
isor
y Pa
nel
reco
mm
ende
d th
at P
ort
staff
co
mm
ence
imm
edia
tely
with
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
pla
ns to
rep
lace
the
curr
ent f
acili
ty a
t Pie
r 35
. Fu
rthe
r, th
e Pa
nel
reco
mm
ende
d it
shou
ld b
e in
itial
ly r
epla
ced
at P
ier
27, w
ith a
sin
gle
bert
h th
at m
eets
ind
ustr
y st
anda
rds
for
a ho
me
port
cr
uise
ter
min
al. P
ier
27 a
lso
has
the
capa
city
to
pote
ntia
lly a
dd a
sec
ond
bert
h at
som
e po
int
in t
he f
utur
e.
On
Sept
embe
r 27
, 200
7, t
he P
ort
Com
mis
sion
acc
epte
d th
e re
com
men
datio
ns o
f th
e C
ruis
e Te
rmin
al A
dvis
ory
Pane
l.
The A
dvis
ory
Pane
l det
erm
ined
that
Pie
r 27
is th
e m
ost c
ost-eff e
ctiv
e op
tion
owin
g to
the
cond
ition
of
the s
ubst
ruct
ure,
the l
engt
h of
the b
erth
, and
the
size
and
usa
bilit
y of
the
cur
rent
mar
itim
e sh
ed.
Pier
27
also
rep
rese
nts
the
mos
t fea
sibl
e lo
catio
n fo
r a p
rim
ary
crui
se te
rmin
al. I
t is
curr
ently
use
d as
a se
cond
ary
crui
se fa
cilit
y an
d ha
s the
phy
sica
l att
rib
utes
for
a p
rim
ary
faci
lity
that
cou
ld m
eet
crui
se i
ndus
try
stan
dard
s. T
he p
roje
ct a
rea
is
10 a
cres
, defi
ned
by
Pier
27,
its
apr
on, a
nd t
he
valle
y se
para
ting
it fr
om P
ier
29.
Pier
27’s
1,3
58
foot
long
ber
th c
an a
ccom
mod
ate
the
larg
est
of
the
meg
a-cr
uise
shi
ps. T
he p
ier
subs
truc
ture
is
gene
rally
in g
ood
cond
ition
. Alth
ough
som
e pi
er
repa
irs a
re n
eede
d, it
is n
ot a
ntic
ipat
ed th
at a
cost
-
proh
ibiti
ve s
eism
ic u
pgra
de w
ould
be
requ
ired
. Th
e ex
istin
g m
ariti
me
shed
is 1
78,1
23 sq
uare
feet
; th
is sh
ed c
ould
be
reno
vate
d to
serv
e at
leas
t as a
si
ngle
ber
th fa
cilit
y.
Base
d on
te
chni
cal
inpu
t fr
om
the
crui
se
indu
stry
, th
e A
dvis
ory
Pane
l re
com
men
ded
that
app
roxi
mat
ely
120,
000
squa
re f
eet
of fl
oor
ar
ea s
houl
d be
dev
oted
for
a si
ngle
ber
th c
ruis
e fa
cilit
y. T
his
reco
mm
ende
d am
ount
wou
ld h
ave
the
capa
bilit
y to
effi
cien
tly s
erve
the
inc
reas
ing
num
ber
of p
asse
nger
s ar
rivi
ng t
o /
depa
rtin
g fr
om a
meg
a-cr
uise
shi
p. P
ier
27 h
as a
n am
ple
apro
n w
idth
of a
ppro
xim
atel
y 50
feet
to effi
cie
ntly
pr
ovis
ion
a sh
ip, a
nd w
ill h
ave
shor
esid
e po
wer
ca
pabi
lity
in 2
010.
Fina
lly, P
ier 2
7 ha
s a
pote
ntia
lly la
rge
circ
ulat
ion
area
in t
he v
alle
y to
acc
omm
odat
e ar
rivi
ng a
nd
depa
rtin
g pr
ivat
ely-
owne
d ve
hicl
es
(PO
Vs)
, ta
xis,
and
bus
es,
as w
ell
as t
he p
oten
tial
for
prov
isio
ning
truc
ks. P
rovi
sion
ing
truc
ks ca
n a
lso
be m
anag
ed a
long
the
pier
apr
on. T
he A
dvis
ory
Pane
l re
com
men
ded
that
a v
ehic
le c
ircu
latio
n ar
ea m
ust
be r
eser
ved,
bot
h in
the
“va
lley”
and
al
ong
the
apro
n, a
nd b
e ca
pabl
e of
han
dlin
g ap
prox
imat
ely
24 i
nter
stat
e tr
acto
r tr
aile
rs a
nd
5-12
del
iver
y tr
ucks
dur
ing
a cr
uise
cal
l. Th
ere
shou
ld a
lso
be a
n ar
ea t
o ac
com
mod
ate
5-10
ai
rpor
t lu
ggag
e tr
ucks
w
ith
3-5
such
tr
ucks
st
aged
in a
que
uing
sta
ging
are
a. T
he c
ircu
latio
n ar
ea
shou
ld
be
able
to
ac
com
mod
ate
10-1
5 bu
s pa
rkin
g sp
aces
and
20-
30 t
axis
. U
sing
the
va
lley
area
and
apr
on i
mpr
oves
the
effi
cien
cy
of p
asse
nger
em
bark
atio
n an
d di
sem
bark
atio
n,
and
redu
ces t
he le
vel o
f traffi
c co
nges
tion
on T
he
Emba
rcad
ero
whe
n a
crui
se s
hip
is in
ber
th.
Pier
27
do
es
have
so
me
nega
tive
att r
ibut
es,
incl
udin
g th
e re
quir
emen
t of o
n-go
ing
dred
ging
at
an an
nual
cost
of a
ppro
xim
atel
y $7
50,0
00. A
lso,
th
ere
are
tidal
and
cur
rent
res
tric
tions
whi
ch
may
lim
it do
ckin
g tim
es.
The
Adv
isor
y Pa
nel
reco
mm
ende
d th
at a
tid
al s
imul
atio
n st
udy
be
initi
ated
lea
ding
to
deve
lopm
ent
of o
pera
tiona
l an
d/or
phy
sica
l m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s. P
ort
staff
ha
s ta
ken
step
s to
initi
ate
this
stu
dy.
The
Adv
isor
y Pa
nel
reco
mm
ende
d th
e Po
rt
Com
mis
sion
re-
affi r
m i
ts c
omm
itmen
t to
the
N
orth
east
Wat
erfr
ont A
dvis
ory
Gro
up to
pro
vide
an
ope
n sp
ace,
upo
n ap
prov
al a
nd c
ompl
etio
n of
a
maj
or m
ixed
-use
dev
elop
men
t pr
ojec
t at
Pie
r 27
.
Pred
atin
g th
e A
dvis
ory
Pane
l’s
delib
erat
ions
, th
e Po
rt e
nter
ed i
nto
an e
xclu
sive
neg
otia
tion
agre
emen
t w
ith S
F Pi
ers,
LLC
for
a p
oten
tial
mix
ed u
se d
evel
opm
ent t
hat m
ight
hav
e inc
lude
d a
crui
se te
rmin
al co
mpo
nent
at P
ier 2
7. H
owev
er,
the
Port
’s ex
clus
ive
nego
tiatio
n ag
reem
ent
with
SF
Pie
rs, L
LC, e
xpir
ed o
n Se
ptem
ber 2
7, 2
008.
BACK
GRO
UN
D
1 |
intr
oduc
tion
9C
on
ce
ptu
al
Sit
e P
lan
nin
g S
tud
y
A c
onsu
ltant
tea
m l
ead
by B
AE,
and
inc
ludi
ng
EDA
W +
DM
JM D
esig
n, P
orts
and
Mar
itim
e G
roup
, C
HS
Traffi
c
Con
sulti
ng,
and
Robi
n C
hian
g &
Com
pany
, was
eng
aged
in 2
008
by th
e Po
rt o
f Sa
n Fr
anci
sco.
Th
e te
am w
as c
harg
ed
with
dev
elop
ing
initi
al c
once
pt p
lans
for P
ier 2
7,
whi
ch w
ould
ena
ble
the
Port
to c
omm
unic
ate
its
idea
s to
pote
ntia
l inv
esto
rs a
nd k
ey st
akeh
olde
rs,
as w
ell a
s ga
in v
alua
ble
feed
back
pri
or t
o a
full
plan
ning
and
des
ign
proc
ess.
The
cons
ulta
nt t
eam
rev
iew
ed t
he e
xist
ing
site
co
nditi
ons
alon
g w
ith th
e pr
ogra
m re
quir
emen
ts
for
a cr
uise
shi
p te
rmin
al a
nd t
he p
ropo
sed
publ
ic o
pen
spac
e, w
ith a
n ey
e to
iden
tifyi
ng th
e is
sues
and
opp
ortu
nitie
s fo
r th
e pr
ojec
t. G
iven
th
e si
te c
onst
rain
ts a
nd t
wo
prog
ram
use
s, t
he
EDA
W t
eam
initi
ally
pre
pare
d a
traffi
c a
naly
sis
to d
eter
min
e al
tern
ativ
e ci
rcul
atio
n pl
ans.
ED
AW
th
en h
oste
d tw
o se
para
te w
orks
hops
with
por
t st
aff
alon
g w
ith d
irec
t st
akeh
olde
rs,
Prin
cess
C
ruis
es a
nd M
etro
Cru
ise
Serv
ices
.
The p
urpo
se o
f Wor
ksho
p O
ne, h
eld
on A
ugus
t 6,
2008
, was
to g
ain
an o
vera
ll un
ders
tand
ing
of th
e is
sues
and
opp
ortu
nitie
s of
the
red
evel
opm
ent.
A l
ist
of k
ey s
tudi
es -
inc
ludi
ng s
ite a
naly
sis,
tr
affi c
ana
lysi
s, b
uild
ing
prog
ram
allo
catio
n an
d di
stri
butio
n, u
rban
con
text
and
fra
mew
ork,
and
op
en s
pace
net
wor
k an
d ch
arac
teri
stic
s -
wer
e de
velo
ped
and
pres
ente
d at
the
fi rs
t w
orks
hop.
A
dditi
onal
in
put
on
crui
se
indu
stry
tr
ends
, si
te s
truc
ture
, an
d se
ism
ic a
naly
sis
wer
e al
so
pres
ente
d. Aft e
r th
e pr
esen
tatio
n po
rtio
n of
the
wor
ksho
p, E
DA
W s
how
ed f
our
site
pla
nnin
g st
rate
gies
to
solic
it in
put
from
por
t st
aff
and
crui
se in
dust
ry s
take
hold
ers.
Usi
ng E
DA
W’s
initi
al s
ite p
lann
ing
diag
ram
s as
a
poin
t of
dep
artu
re,
the
aft e
rnoo
n di
scus
sion
fo
cuse
d on
site
stra
tegi
es a
nd d
esig
n ap
proa
ches
, yi
eldi
ng
four
sk
etch
es
of
traffi
c
circ
ulat
ion
optio
ns. T
hese
traffi
c c
ircu
latio
n sk
etch
es fo
rmed
th
e ba
sis
of fo
ur s
ite o
ptio
ns. E
ach
of s
ite o
ptio
n ex
plor
ed a
diff
eren
t lay
out a
nd c
onfi g
urat
ion
of
1 |
intr
oduc
tion
the
2-ac
re o
pen
spac
e, a
s w
ell
as m
odifi
catio
ns
to t
he P
ier
27 b
uild
ing.
Th
e go
al w
as t
o st
udy
diff e
rent
spa
tial c
ondi
tions
whi
ch a
ccom
mod
ate
traffi
c a
nd p
edes
tria
n ci
rcul
atio
n on
the
site
.
With
a c
onfi r
med
lis
t of
pla
nnin
g cr
iteri
a an
d in
put
from
wor
ksho
p on
e,
the
cons
ulta
nt t
eam
de
velo
ped
four
con
cept
ual
site
pla
ns.
Dur
ing
Wor
ksho
p Tw
o, th
ese f
our c
once
ptua
l pla
ns w
ere
pres
ente
d an
d re
view
ed a
ccor
ding
to th
e c
rite
ria
of t
raffi
c ci
rcul
atio
n, t
erm
inal
bui
ldin
g la
yout
an
d op
erat
ion,
and
ope
n sp
ace
confi
gur
atio
n.
For
each
cr
iteri
a,
the
wor
ksho
p pa
rtic
ipan
ts
(incl
udin
g th
e por
t’s m
ariti
me g
roup
and
plan
ning
gr
oup,
the
crui
se in
dust
ry s
take
hold
ers,
and
the
repr
esen
tativ
es f
rom
the
Bay
Con
serv
atio
n an
d D
evel
opm
ent
Com
mis
sion
[BC
DC
] ),
nam
ed
the
top
two
optio
ns a
nd d
iscu
ssed
the
pros
and
co
ns o
f ea
ch. S
imila
r to
the
fi r
st w
orks
hop,
the
op
tions
cat
alyz
ed d
iscu
ssio
n an
d he
lped
mov
e th
e te
am to
war
ds r
efi n
emen
t of a
n ov
eral
l set
of
deve
lopm
ent c
rite
ria,
and
pref
erre
d di
agra
mm
atic
co
ncep
t lay
out p
lans
.
At
the
conc
lusi
on
of
the
seco
nd
wor
ksho
p,
the
cons
ulta
nt t
eam
and
Por
t st
aff
agre
ed t
hat
the
team
wou
ld d
evel
op t
wo
cons
olid
ated
site
pl
ans
that
bes
t refl e
cted
the
com
bine
d ne
eds
of
each
of t
he P
ier
27 s
take
hold
ers,
bui
ldin
g on
the
com
men
ts m
ade
at t
he t
wo
wor
ksho
ps.
Thes
e tw
o pl
ans w
ere p
rese
nted
at t
he P
ort C
omm
issi
on
Mee
ting
on O
ctob
er 2
8, 2
008.
PRO
CESS
WO
RKS
HO
P D
IAG
RAM
10
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
11
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
PREL
IMIN
ARY
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T CR
ITER
IA
12
URBA
N C
ON
TEXT
13
VIEW
14
SITE
GRAD
ING
16
EXIS
TIN
G S
TRU
CTU
RES
16
STRU
CTU
RAL
AN
D S
EISM
IC C
ON
STRAI
NTS
18
CRU
ISE
IND
UST
RY A
ND
ACT
IVIT
Y O
UTL
OO
KS
19
CRU
ISE
TERM
INAL
TRAF
FIC
DAT
A
21
CRU
ISE
TERM
INAL
FAC
ILIT
Y
24 O
PEN
SPA
CE
26
2 |
SI
TE
AN
AL
YS
IS
AN
D D
ES
IG
N C
RI
TE
RI
A
12
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
A n
ew cr
uise
term
inal
with
an effi
cie
nt v
ehic
ular
circ
ulat
ion
area
is
the
high
est
prio
rity
for
the
pr
ojec
t.
The
Nor
thea
st
Wha
rf
Plaz
a w
ill
be
ac
com
mod
ated
and
des
igne
d to
max
imiz
e us
e by
vis
itors
and
res
iden
ts, p
rovi
ded
that
it d
oes
not i
nter
fere
with
cru
ise
line
oper
atio
ns.
This
cru
ise
term
inal
pro
ject
mus
t mee
t cur
rent
indu
stry
ope
ratio
nal s
tand
ards
for o
ne p
rim
ary
bert
h fo
r hom
e po
rt c
ruis
e te
rmin
al.
The
crui
se t
erm
inal
bui
ldin
g m
ust
effi c
ient
ly
ac
com
mod
ate
peak
use
rs.
Pier
27 sh
ed sh
ould
be r
enov
ated
to a
wor
ld-c
lass
hom
e po
rt c
ruis
e te
rmin
al, w
hile
not
trig
geri
ng
a se
ism
ic re
trofi
t of
the
pier
sub
stru
ctur
e.
PREL
IMIN
ARY
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T CR
ITER
IAW
hile
rec
reat
ion
faci
litie
s ar
e ne
eded
in
the
ar
ea, t
hey
are
subo
rdin
ate
to th
e cr
uise
term
inal
an
d op
en s
pace
req
uire
men
ts. R
ecre
atio
n us
es
may
be
acco
mm
odat
ed i
n th
e Pi
er 2
9 sh
ed
(alth
ough
she
d co
lum
ns m
ay r
estr
ict
a fu
ll ra
nge
of r
ecre
atio
nal a
ctiv
ities
). Th
ere
may
be
avai
labl
e sp
ace
for r
ecre
atio
nal u
ses w
ithin
Pie
r 27
and
the
val
ley
area
, pro
vide
d th
at t
hey
do
not i
nter
fere
with
cru
ise
func
tions
and
sec
urity
re
quir
emen
ts.
Pier
27
faci
litie
s sh
ould
acc
omm
odat
e sh
ared
use
to
gene
rate
re
venu
e an
d pr
ovid
e a
com
mun
ity b
enefi
t, p
rovi
ded
that
thes
e us
es d
o no
t int
erfe
re w
ith c
ruis
e fu
nctio
ns a
nd s
ecur
ity
requ
irem
ents
.
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
13
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
0.75
mile
0.5
mile
0.25
mile
0.25
mile
0.5
mile
0.75
mile
1 m
ile1.
25 m
ile1.
5 m
ile2
mile
1 m
ile
1.25
mile
1.5
mile
1.75
mile
2 m
ile
5m
in
5m
in
10m
in
10m
in
15m
in
15m
in
20 m
in
20m
in
30m
in
30m
in
25m
in
25m
in
2931313
33
353
39
41
45
27si
te
2300 19
1715
9
31
30
28
3638 40
Bay Brid
ge
Bay Brid
ge
park
w/ s
culp
ture
fest
ival
site
rest
aura
nt te
rrac
e
law
n pa
rk w
/ scu
lptu
reki
ds a
rea
pier
plaz
a w
/ tem
p sc
ulpt
urela
wn
plaz
a / m
arke
t pla
ce
park
wat
er fr
ont
pier
park
min
i pla
za
prom
enad
e pa
rk
amph
ithea
ter
nativ
e gr
assp
ark
deck
mar
ina
ball
park
ent
ry +
mar
ina
The
Emba
rcad
ero
is a
con
tinuo
us 3
-mile
wat
erfr
ont
prom
enad
e, s
tret
chin
g fr
om P
ier
40 a
t th
e so
uth
to P
ier
45 a
t th
e no
rth.
It
links
the
AT&
T Ba
llpar
k ba
seba
ll st
adiu
m, F
erry
Bui
ldin
g at
Mar
ket
Stre
et,
and
Fish
erm
an’s
Wha
rf a
t Pie
r 39,
alo
ng w
ith se
vera
l ot
her
node
s of
act
iviti
es,
mak
ing
it an
im
port
ant
open
spa
ce n
etw
ork
for t
he c
ity o
f San
Fra
ncis
co.
Cur
rent
ly, P
ier 2
7 si
ts in
the
mid
dle
of a
long
stre
tch
of t
he w
ater
fron
t pr
omen
ade
betw
een
two
node
s.
The
site
the
refo
re p
rese
nts
a gr
eat
oppo
rtun
ity t
o cr
eate
a n
ew f
ocus
of
activ
ity t
hat
wou
ld b
ett e
r co
nnec
t nod
es a
long
The
Em
barc
ader
o.
As
a ne
w n
ode
of a
ctiv
ity,
Pier
27
will
nee
d to
pr
ovid
e sp
ace
for v
isito
rs, r
esid
ents
and
cru
ise
ship
gu
ests
. It w
ill a
lso
need
to c
onsi
der
how
to r
educ
e th
e im
pact
of
vehi
cula
r tr
affi c
on
the
pede
stri
an
expe
rien
ce a
long
The
Em
barc
ader
o.
URBA
N C
ON
TEXT
em
ba
rca
de
rop
ark
de
ck
wa
terf
ron
t p
rom
en
ad
em
ari
na
pla
za
pie
r
EXIS
TIN
G O
PEN
SPA
CE T
YPES
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
OPE
N S
PACE
S AL
ON
G T
HE
EMBA
RCA
DER
O
14
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
29313
33
35
39
41
45
27si
tesi
te
2319
17115
99
31
30330
28
363638 40
Bay Brid
ge
His
tori
cally
, vie
ws
to t
he b
ay w
ere
bloc
ked
by t
he
pier
hea
d bu
ildin
gs al
ong
The E
mba
rcad
ero
beca
use
of th
e mar
itim
e nat
ure o
f the
wat
erfr
ont.
Occ
asio
nal
view
s exi
sts b
etw
een
pier
bui
ldin
gs.
The
sout
h en
d of
pie
r 27
shed
is p
ropo
sed
to b
e pa
rtia
lly re
mov
ed
to c
reat
e th
e op
en s
pace
pro
vidi
ng o
ppor
tuni
ty t
o op
en a
nd fr
ame
the
view
to th
e ba
y.
Vie
ws
alon
g th
e Em
barc
ader
o oc
cur
occa
sion
ally
, al
low
ed b
y ga
ps b
etw
een
Pier
bui
ldin
gs. T
hese
vie
w
oppo
rtun
ities
- to
the
Bay
and
to m
ariti
me
activ
ities
- ar
e cr
itica
l to
crea
ting
a st
rong
sen
se o
f pla
ce a
long
th
e w
ater
fron
t. N
ew p
ublic
acc
ess
and
open
spa
ces
shou
ld in
clud
e vi
ews t
o th
e Ba
y, m
ariti
me
activ
ities
, an
d if
feas
ible
, the
city
. The
y sh
ould
als
o in
clud
e co
ntac
t w
ith a
pie
r ed
ge,
seaw
all
edge
, or
oth
er
wat
erfr
ont e
dge
whe
reve
r fea
sibl
e.
Pier
27 h
as o
utst
andi
ng v
isua
l acc
ess p
oten
tial.
From
th
e ed
ge o
f th
e pi
er, o
ne h
as a
uni
que
180
degr
ee
view
of
the
Bay,
inc
ludi
ng A
lcat
raz
Isla
nd, A
ngel
Is
land
, Ye
rba
Buen
a Is
land
, Tr
easu
re I
slan
d, a
nd
the
Bay
Brid
ge. T
owar
ds th
e ci
ty, o
ne c
an v
iew
Coi
t To
wer
and
the
pyr
amid
al T
rans
amer
ica
build
ing,
tw
o m
ajor
San
Fra
ncis
co la
ndm
arks
, and
pot
entia
lly
an o
pen
view
of t
he d
ownt
own
skyl
ine
VIEW
S
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
WAT
ER V
IEW
CO
RRID
ORS
ALO
NG
EM
BARCA
DER
O
EXTE
ND
ED V
IEW
CO
RRID
ORS
BERKE
LEY
TREA
SURE
ISLA
ND
YERBA
BU
ENA
BAY
BRID
GE
ALC
ATRAZ
AN
GEL
ISL
AN
D
CO
IT T
OW
ER
TRAN
SAM
ERIC
A P
YRAM
ID
PIE
R 2
7
15
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
Alc
atra
z Is
land
Yerb
a B
uena
Trea
sure
Isla
nd
Bay B
ridge
Tran
sam
eric
a P
yram
id
Coi
t To
wer
29293113
33
35
39
41
45
277si
te
23319
1715
9
31
30
28
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
tra
ns
am
eri
ca
py
ram
idc
oit
to
we
ra
lca
tra
z
KEY
VIEW
S FR
OM
TH
E SI
TE
VIEW
S FR
OM
TH
E SI
TE
16
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
The
orig
inal
con
stru
ctio
n of
Pie
r 27
inc
lude
d a
load
ing
dock
run
ning
alo
ng th
e w
este
rn p
ortio
n of
th
e m
ariti
me
shed
cre
atin
g a
vert
ical
diff
eren
ce o
f ap
prox
imat
ely
3.5
feet
bet
wee
n th
e Pi
er 2
7 sh
ed a
nd
the
valle
y ar
ea.
Exis
ting
plat
form
s at
thes
e tw
o diff e
rent
ele
vatio
ns
wer
e or
igin
ally
con
stru
cted
in
a w
ay s
o th
at t
hey
wer
e di
rect
ly ti
ed to
the
pier
subs
truc
ture
. Thr
ough
th
e as
sess
men
ts o
f the
exi
stin
g su
bstr
uctu
re, i
t was
de
term
ined
tha
t it
is n
ot e
cono
mic
ally
fea
sibl
e to
lo
wer
the
ele
vatio
ns o
f th
ese
plat
form
s w
ithou
t tr
igge
ring
a s
ignifi c
ant s
eism
ic u
pgra
des.
In o
rder
to r
esol
ve a
cces
s an
d ci
rcul
atio
n pr
oble
ms
betw
een
thes
e tw
o el
evat
ions
, tr
ansi
tiona
l sl
opes
an
d st
airs
sha
ll be
con
stru
cted
on
top
of th
e lo
wer
pl
atfo
rm. W
hen
a po
rtio
n of
Pie
r 27
is d
emol
ishe
d fo
r the
Nor
thea
st W
harf
Pla
za, a
n op
en sp
ace d
esig
n m
ust
acco
mm
odat
e tw
o diff e
rent
pla
tform
leve
ls.
Pier
29
m
ariti
me
shed
, bu
ilt
in
1915
-18,
is
a
cont
ribu
ting
hist
oric
re
sour
ce
in
the
Nat
iona
l Re
gist
er o
f His
tori
c Pla
ces,
the
refo
re, m
odifi
catio
ns
to th
e st
ruct
ure
mus
t be
min
imiz
ed to
mai
ntai
n its
hi
stor
ical
val
ue a
nd in
tegr
ity.
Pier
29
Beltl
ine
Offi
ce A
nnex
, ori
gina
lly b
uilt
in 1
903
next
to P
ier 3
, was
mov
ed to
its
pres
ent l
ocat
ion
on
The
Emba
rcad
ero
betw
een
Pier
27
and
Pier
29
in
1918
. Thi
s bu
ildin
g is
als
o de
sign
ated
as
an h
isto
ric
reso
urce
and
sha
ll be
ret
aine
d on
-site
or
poss
ibly
re
loca
ted
to a
noth
er l
ocat
ion
with
in t
he H
isto
ric
Dis
tric
t.
The
non-
hist
oric
Pie
r 27
Ann
ex b
uild
ing
will
like
ly
be d
emol
ishe
d to
allo
w fo
r ter
min
al o
pera
tions
and
as
req
uire
d un
der
the
BCD
C S
peci
al A
rea
Plan
. Li
kew
ise,
te
mpo
rary
st
ruct
ures
, su
ch
as
Teat
ro
Zinz
anni
, w
ill b
e re
loca
ted
to a
llow
for
ter
min
al
oper
atio
ns.
SITE
GRAD
ING
EXIS
TIN
G S
TRU
CTU
RES
SITE
SEC
TIO
N (
PIER
27
AND
TH
E “V
ALLE
Y” S
TRU
CTU
RE)
GRAD
E CH
ANG
E O
N S
ITE
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
PIER
29
HIS
TORIC
PIE
R H
EAD
BU
ILD
ING
PIER
29
INTE
RIO
R
17
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
+2
38
+1
75+
2+
2+
2+
2+
2+
2+
2+
22222+
22+
2+
222+
2+
2222222222+
2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222223333833838383333333383
+++1
+1
+++++1
+1
++1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+++1
++11
+++++++++1
++++1
++1
+++++++++++++7575757575575
3.5’
ele
vatio
n sh
ift
PLAT
FORM
SLO
PES
DOW
N T
O G
RADE
GRA
DE C
HAN
GE
PIE
R 2
7
PIE
R 2
9
TEA
TRO
ZIN
AN
NI
PIE
R 2
9 B
ELT
LIN
E
OFF
ICE
AN
NE
X
PIE
R 2
7A
NN
EX
+4
08
+4
08
+0
42
+2
27
+1
75
+1
75
+2
58
+0
15
+0
48TO
P O
F W
ALL
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
SITE
GRAD
ES A
ND
EXI
STIN
G S
TRU
CTU
RES
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
18
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
Pier
27
subs
truc
ture
is in
gen
eral
ly g
ood
cond
ition
, an
d no
maj
or r
epai
rs w
ill b
e ne
cess
ary.
Pie
r 27
and
Pi
er 2
9 ar
e st
ruct
ural
ly in
tegr
ated
and
wer
e bu
ilt in
19
67, c
onst
ruct
ed w
ith p
ile-s
tres
sed
conc
rete
pile
s w
ith
conc
rete
sl
ab
and
apro
ns.
App
roxi
mat
ely
$2.5
mill
ion
of s
eism
ic u
pgra
des
for
subs
truc
ture
de
cks
of P
iers
27
and
29 w
ere
com
plet
ed i
n 19
95.
The
fend
er s
yste
m a
t Pi
er 2
7 w
ill n
eed
upgr
ades
w
ithin
the
next
fi ve
yea
rs. P
ier 2
9 su
bstr
uctu
re d
eck
requ
ires
con
side
rabl
e am
ount
of
repa
ir. T
he c
ost,
roug
hly
estim
ated
by
Win
sler
& K
elly
to b
e ab
out
$7 m
illio
n, n
eeds
to
be d
eter
min
ed aft e
r a
mor
e de
taile
d st
ruct
ural
ass
essm
ent.
The
pier
sub
stru
ctur
e de
cks
will
req
uire
add
ition
al
seis
mic
upg
rade
s if
ther
e is
a c
hang
e of
use
or
sign
ifi ca
nt n
ew co
nstr
uctio
n ei
ther
on
Pier
27
or P
ier
29, a
s pe
r the
200
8 Po
rt B
uild
ing
code
. Acc
ordi
ngly
, th
e si
te
plan
ning
te
am
assu
med
re
nova
tion
of
mos
t of
the
Pie
r 27
she
d, w
ith t
he a
dditi
on o
f a
mez
zani
ne s
pace
, an
d de
mol
ition
of
a po
rtio
n of
Th
e Em
barc
ader
o en
d of
the
she
d, t
o al
low
for
th
e N
orth
east
Wha
rf P
laza
. By
care
fully
avo
idin
g si
gnifi
cant
new
con
stru
ctio
n an
d ch
ange
of u
se o
n bo
th P
ier
27 a
nd 2
9, n
o se
ism
ic u
pgra
de w
ould
be
trig
gere
d, th
ereb
y re
duci
ng th
e ov
eral
l pro
ject
cos
t. A
ll de
ck i
mpr
ovem
ents
mus
t al
so c
ompl
y w
ith
seis
mic
and
oth
er r
equi
rem
ents
of
the
2008
Por
t Bu
ildin
g C
ode.
SUBS
TRU
CTU
RE
AND
SEI
SMIC
CO
NST
RAI
NTS
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
EXIS
TIN
G S
TRU
CTU
RE
SECT
ION
19
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
Key
Poi
nts
San
Fran
cisc
o is
a p
opul
ar d
estin
atio
n fo
r bo
th
do
mes
tic a
nd in
tern
atio
nal t
rave
lers
.
As
crui
se
vaca
tions
be
com
e m
ore
popu
lar,
es
peci
ally
aft e
r 9/
11,
mor
e cr
uise
shi
ps a
re
com
ing
to S
an F
ranc
isco
.
1985
- 3,
300
visi
tors
20
05 -
225,
000
visi
tors
and
81
calls
20
08 -
Expe
cted
180
,000
vis
itors
, 62
calls
Dry
doc
k fa
cilit
ies
at P
ier
70 a
lso
mak
e Sa
n
Fran
cisc
o a
popu
lar p
ort w
here
the
ship
s can
go
thru
repa
ir w
hile
in th
e ci
ty.
San
Fran
cisc
o cu
rren
tly f
unct
ions
as
diff e
rent
type
of
port
s th
roug
h ou
t th
e ye
ar,
(hom
e,
tran
sit,
and
turn
arou
nd).
Prim
ary
crui
se
dest
inat
ions
, or
igin
atin
g fr
om S
an F
ranc
isco
, ar
e A
lask
a an
d M
exic
o.
The
port
als
o ho
sts
num
erou
s tr
ansi
t cal
ls th
at d
o no
t ori
gina
te o
r en
d in
San
Fra
ncis
co.
Peak
mon
ths
are
May
, Sep
tem
ber,
and
Oct
ober
.
Ther
e is
no
dist
inct
ion
betw
een
wee
kday
and
wee
kend
leve
ls o
f act
ivity
.
Vari
ous t
ypes
of c
ruis
es v
isit
San
Fran
cisc
o, a
nd
he
nce
the
term
inal
requ
ires
fl ex
ibili
ty:
H
ome
Port
47%
Tr
ansi
t Por
t
35%
Tu
rnar
ound
18%
CRU
ISE
ACTI
VITY
PRO
JECT
ION
S FO
R A
LL S
F PO
RTS
HIS
TORIC
AL T
REN
D (
Num
ber
of C
alls
)
PRO
JECT
ION
S
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
CRU
ISE
IND
UST
RY A
ND
ACT
IVIT
Y O
UTL
OO
KS
20
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
MO
NTH
LY T
REN
D
WEE
KLY
TREN
D
HIG
H G
RO
WTH
PRO
JECT
ION
LOW
GRO
WTH
PRO
JECT
ION
CRU
ISE
IND
UST
RY A
ND
ACT
IVIT
Y O
UTL
OO
KS
CRU
ISE
ACTI
VITY
PRO
JECT
ION
S FO
R P
RIM
ARY
PORT
(PI
ER 2
7)
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
PRO
JECT
ION
S
NU
MBE
R O
F D
AYS
WIT
H S
HIP
IN
BER
TH
21
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
Traffi
c c
ircu
latio
n in
to, o
ut o
f, an
d w
ithin
the
site
w
ill b
e cr
ucia
l to
the
effi
cien
t fu
nctio
ning
of
the
crui
se t
erm
inal
. Pi
er 2
7 ha
s a
pote
ntia
lly l
arge
ci
rcul
atio
n ar
ea
in
the
valle
y to
ac
com
mod
ate
arri
ving
and
dep
artin
g pr
ivat
ely-
owne
d ve
hicl
es
(PO
Vs)
, ta
xis,
bu
ses
and
prov
isio
ning
tr
ucks
. Pr
ogra
m r
equi
rem
ents
for
tru
cks,
bus
es,
taxi
es,
and
pass
enge
r ve
hicl
es w
ere
estim
ated
bas
ed o
n th
e da
ta p
rese
nted
in
the
tabl
e be
low
for
a 4
,400
pa
ssen
ger
crui
se
ship
. Th
e re
quir
emen
ts
wer
e pr
esen
ted
duri
ng W
orks
hop
Two,
and
the
gro
up
conc
urre
d w
ith t
he r
equi
rem
ents
.
At
any
give
n ho
ur d
urin
g th
e de
bark
per
iod,
a v
ehic
le ci
rcul
atio
n ar
ea m
ust b
e re
serv
ed a
nd c
apab
le o
f han
dlin
g 8
to
12 s
emi-t
ract
or tr
aile
rs (
it is
not
ed th
at th
e C
ity a
nd
Cou
nty
of S
an F
ranc
isco
has
res
tric
tions
for
truc
ks
long
er t
han
65 f
eet
in l
engt
h in
the
city
), an
d 6-
9 de
liver
y tr
ucks
dur
ing
a cr
uise
cal
l, as
sum
ing
the
aver
age
load
ing
dura
tion
wou
ld b
e 60
min
utes
. If
the
aver
age
dura
tion
is tw
o ho
urs,
then
the
num
ber
of tr
uck
load
ing
spac
es w
ould
dou
ble.
The
re sh
ould
al
so b
e an
are
a to
acc
omm
odat
e 5-
8 bu
s pa
rkin
g sp
aces
, as
sum
ing
the
aver
age
load
ing
dura
tion
is 3
0 m
inut
es, a
nd 3
-5 t
axi l
oadi
ng a
nd u
nloa
ding
sp
aces
, as
sum
ing
an a
vera
ge 1
.5 m
inut
e lo
adin
g tim
e.
Dem
and
is r
educ
ed d
urin
g th
e em
bark
pe
riod
.
Dur
ing
the
hour
s of
deb
ark
and
emba
rk
occu
rrin
g si
mul
tane
ousl
y, th
ere
wou
ld b
e up
to 6
80
POV
’s ci
rcul
atin
g th
e va
lley.
Thi
s w
ould
req
uire
17
POV
que
uing
spa
ces,
with
an
appr
oxim
atel
y 1.
5 m
inut
e tu
rnov
er ra
te. U
sing
the
valle
y ar
ea fo
r the
se
vehi
cles
wou
ld im
prov
e th
e effi
cie
ncy
of p
asse
nger
em
bark
atio
n an
d di
sem
bark
atio
n, a
nd r
educ
e th
e le
vel
of t
raffi
c co
nges
tion
on T
he E
mba
rcad
ero
whe
n a
crui
se s
hip
is in
ber
th.
A p
rim
ary
crui
se t
erm
inal
ope
ratio
n w
ill r
equi
re
a si
gnifi
cant
am
ount
of
spac
e to
be
used
for
the
circ
ulat
ion
of p
riva
tely
ow
ned
vehi
cles
(“P
OV
s”),
buse
s, ta
xis
and
prov
isio
ning
sup
ply
truc
ks a
s w
ell
as a
ded
icat
ed q
ueui
ng s
tagi
ng a
rea
for
crui
se s
hip
prov
isio
ning
. Fo
r ex
ampl
e, u
p to
500
pal
lets
of
prov
isio
ns m
ay b
e off -
load
ed an
d pl
aced
in a
stag
ing
area
bef
ore
bein
g lo
aded
on
to th
e cr
uise
shi
p. T
he
plan
ning
team
ack
now
ledg
ed th
at th
e si
te p
lann
ing
eff o
rt m
ust
acco
mm
odat
e ea
ch o
f th
ese
vehi
cula
r ty
pes,
the
ir r
espe
ctiv
e ci
rcul
atio
n fl o
ws,
and
the
tim
ing
of t
heir
res
pect
ive
arri
vals
and
dep
artu
res.
Fo
r ex
ampl
e, f
or a
cru
ise
ship
deb
arka
tion,
mos
t su
pply
truc
ks m
ay a
rriv
e fr
om 5
:00
a.m
. to
10:0
0 am
, w
hile
bus
es, t
axis
and
PO
Vs
arri
ve a
ppro
xim
atel
y be
twee
n 8:
00 a
.m. t
o 11
:00
am. D
urin
g th
e ho
urs
of
deba
rkat
ion
and
emba
rkat
ion
of a
4,4
00 p
asse
nger
m
ega-
crui
se sh
ip, t
here
may
be a
s man
y as
680 P
OV
s ci
rcul
atin
g th
e va
lley.
Avo
idin
g co
nfl ic
t of
the
se
fl ow
s is o
ne o
f the
mos
t im
port
ant c
ircu
latio
n is
sues
to
be
cons
ider
ed in
the
site
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s.
(Sta
tistic
s pro
vide
d by
Lor
enzo
Loo
per a
nd Jo
hn O
ldef
endt
from
Met
ro C
ruis
e Se
rvic
es)
HO
URLY
VEH
ICLE
VO
LUM
ES F
OR 4
,400
PAS
SEN
GER
CRU
ISE
SHIP
CRU
ISE
TERM
INAL
TRAF
FIC
DAT
A
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
OFF
-STR
EET
PARKI
NG
IN
VEN
TORY
22
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
The
term
inal
wou
ld h
ave
appr
oxim
atel
y 12
0,00
0 sq
uare
fee
t of
fi r
st fl
oor
are
a, a
nd a
n ad
ditio
nal
20 p
erce
nt a
s a
new
mez
zani
ne a
rea
for
over
head
em
bark
atio
n/di
sem
bark
atio
n, v
ia a
t le
ast
one
new
pa
ssen
ger g
angw
ay s
yste
m.
A b
agga
ge a
rea
need
s to
be
at le
ast
45,0
00 s
quar
e fe
et, t
o al
low
for
larg
e ve
ssel
s on
long
er it
iner
arie
s to
eff e
ctiv
ely
sche
dule
gu
ests
’ de
bark
atio
n. A
s a
note
, a
larg
er b
agga
ge
area
of u
p to
70,
000
squa
re fe
et h
as b
een
disc
usse
d an
d co
uld
be a
ccom
mod
ated
, if r
equi
red.
Bag
gage
ca
rous
els a
re n
ot p
refe
rred
due
to th
eir s
ize,
cost
, and
m
aint
enan
ce n
eeds
, an
d th
e te
rmin
al c
an o
pera
te
with
gre
ater
fl ex
ibili
ty a
nd effi
cien
cy w
ithou
t the
m.
Sepa
rate
dis
emba
rkat
ion
and
emba
rkat
ion
zone
s ar
e ne
cess
ary
and
need
to b
e ar
rang
ed to
min
imiz
e th
e po
tent
ial f
or m
ixin
g pa
ssen
gers
, whi
ch w
ould
re
duce
eff
ect
iven
ess
and
pote
ntia
lly
heig
hten
se
curi
ty c
once
rns.
The
re s
houl
d be
suffi
cie
nt s
pace
fo
r up
to
50 c
heck
-in c
ount
ers
in t
he e
mba
rkat
ion
area
.
Add
ition
ally
, th
e te
rmin
al b
uild
ing
and
site
mus
t co
mpl
y w
ith v
ario
us s
ecur
ity r
equi
rem
ents
. Th
e bu
ildin
g its
elf
mus
t com
ply
with
CBP
reg
ulat
ions
. Th
e si
te w
ould
nee
d to
abs
orb
the
impa
cts
of t
he
CBP
regu
latio
ns, a
s wel
l as a
dher
ing
to st
anda
rd P
ort
and
Coa
st G
uard
secu
rity
mea
sure
s. T
he w
ater
fron
t w
ould
be
subj
ect t
o C
oast
Gua
rd a
nd v
esse
l-rel
ated
se
curi
ty. A
ll se
curi
ty m
easu
res
wou
ld n
eed
to b
e sc
alab
le, r
elat
ing
not o
nly
to th
e fa
cilit
y an
d its
site
, bu
t als
o to
the
loca
l are
a. S
ecur
ity p
lans
wou
ld a
lso
need
to r
espo
nd to
hei
ghte
ned
or d
ecre
ased
thre
at
leve
ls, w
hile
mai
ntai
ning
term
inal
ope
ratio
ns.
In a
dditi
on t
o cr
itica
l pr
ogra
mm
atic
cri
teri
a, t
he
term
inal
has
the
im
port
ant
oppo
rtun
ity t
o cr
eate
a
posi
tive
resp
onse
by
thos
e w
ho u
se i
t an
d ar
e im
pact
ed b
y it.
A c
ruis
e te
rmin
al is
, by
its n
atur
e,
TERM
INAL
BU
ILD
ING
REQ
UIR
EMEN
TS
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
a tr
ansi
ent
build
ing
and,
as
such
, pas
seng
ers
will
m
ake
quic
k ju
dgm
ents
abo
ut t
he q
ualit
y of
the
ir
expe
rien
ce a
s th
ey m
ove
thro
ugh
the
build
ing.
Th
ese
judg
men
ts
have
th
e im
port
ant
valu
e of
infl u
enci
ng p
asse
nger
s’ de
cisi
on t
o re
turn
in
the
futu
re, t
hus
the
long
term
via
bilit
y of
the
term
inal
. Th
e te
rmin
al h
as off e
rs g
reat
vie
w a
nd c
onne
ctio
n po
tent
ial,
to b
oth
the
City
of S
an F
ranc
isco
and
its
rem
arka
ble
wat
erfr
ont.
Cru
ise
days
and
non
-cru
ise
days
hav
e un
ique
cha
ract
eris
tics,
w
ith d
iff er
ent
oppo
rtun
ities
to
prom
ote
thos
e co
nnec
tions
. Th
e te
rmin
al
also
ha
s im
port
ant
rela
tions
hips
w
ith
the
site
’s op
erat
iona
l, ve
hicu
lar,
and
open
spa
ces.
Ea
ch o
f th
ese
rela
tions
hips
is a
n op
port
unity
for
a
posi
tive
long
-term
im
pact
. Th
e te
rmin
al p
rogr
am
mus
t in
clud
e al
l ne
cess
ary
prog
ram
el
emen
ts
cons
iste
nt w
ith a
full-
serv
ice
hom
e po
rt fa
cilit
y, fo
r a
desi
gn v
esse
l w
ith a
cap
acity
of
appr
oxim
atel
y 45
00 p
asse
nger
s.
This
inc
lude
s al
l em
bark
atio
n,
dise
mba
rkat
ion,
se
curi
ty,
crui
se
line,
cr
ew
and
term
inal
ope
ratio
nal s
pace
s.
To eff e
ctiv
ely
serv
ice
this
siz
e of
ves
sel,
the
term
inal
mus
t be
des
igne
d fo
r pl
easa
nt,
effi c
ient
, sa
fe a
nd s
ecur
e m
ovem
ent
of p
asse
nger
s an
d th
eir
belo
ngin
gs.
At
the
sam
e tim
e, t
he t
erm
inal
mus
t be
arr
ange
d to
max
imiz
e th
e effi
cie
nt a
nd s
ecur
e fl o
w o
f goo
ds a
nd b
agga
ge
to a
nd f
rom
the
ves
sel,
and
prov
ide
othe
r ve
ssel
su
ppor
t ser
vice
s as
requ
ired
.
Arr
ange
men
t of
bo
th
the
emba
rkat
ion
and
dise
mba
rkat
ion
spac
es w
ithin
the
ter
min
al c
an
be m
ade
in t
hree
bas
ic w
ays.
Th
e fi r
st i
s th
at
the
emba
rkat
ion
spac
es c
an o
rgan
ize
prim
arily
to
war
d th
e Em
barc
ader
o en
d of
th
e bu
ildin
g,
clos
est
to t
he p
edes
tria
n an
d ve
hicu
lar
entr
y to
th
e si
te.
Thi
s pr
omot
es a
cle
ar s
ense
of
entr
y fr
om t
he E
mba
rcad
ero
but
does
not
nec
essa
rily
co
ordi
nate
with
veh
icle
dro
p-off
an
d fl o
w.
The
seco
nd w
ay is
for
emba
rkat
ion
to b
e in
the
mid
dle,
w
ith d
isem
bark
atio
n sp
aces
sur
roun
ding
it.
Thi
s ac
hiev
es
anot
her
reco
gniz
able
bu
ildin
g fo
rm
with
a d
omin
atin
g em
bark
atio
n en
try,
but
cre
ates
in
effi c
ienc
ies
with
the
lay
out
of c
ritic
al p
rogr
am
spac
es su
ch a
s bag
gage
lay-
dow
n. T
he th
ird
way
is
for
the
emba
rkat
ion
spac
es to
be
orga
nize
d to
war
d th
e w
ater
-sid
e of
the
site
. Th
is p
uts
emba
rkat
ion
furt
her
from
vie
ws
from
The
Em
barc
ader
o, b
ut
crea
tes
the
pote
ntia
l fo
r dr
amat
ic i
nter
ior
spac
es,
give
n th
e vi
ews
out t
o th
e ha
rbor
.
23
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
TERM
INAL
EM
BARKA
TIO
N /
DIS
EMBA
RKA
TIO
N
LAYO
UT
OPT
ION
S
DE
DD
E
DE
Pro
gra
m E
lem
en
t4
50
0
To
tal P
AX
1st
Leve
l2
nd
Leve
lG
rou
p S
um
ad
d c
heck
Pre
-Scr
een
Lo
bb
y2
25
02
25
00
22
50
En
try
Scr
een
ing
14
00
14
00
01
40
0
Em
bark
Waiti
ng
/Ch
eck
-in
33
75
03
37
53
03
75
33
75
0
Em
bark
/Deb
ark
Pass
ag
e3
15
00
31
50
31
50
Em
bark
Qeu
e9
00
03
00
06
00
04
95
50
90
00
CB
P P
rimary
99
00
99
00
09
90
0
CB
P S
eco
nd
ary
45
00
45
00
04
50
0
Bag
gag
e la
y-d
ow
n4
50
00
45
00
00
59
40
04
50
00
Cru
ise L
ine O
ffic
es
20
00
20
00
02
00
0
Secu
rity
10
00
10
00
01
00
0
Po
rt P
olic
e1
00
01
00
00
10
00
Cre
w S
pace
90
09
00
09
00
Sto
rag
e6
75
05
73
81
01
36
75
0
Pro
visi
on
s9
00
09
00
00
20
65
09
00
0
M/W
T.
30
00
24
00
60
03
00
0
Bld
g S
yste
ms
60
30
40
20
20
10
60
30
09
03
00
Su
b T
ota
l1
38
63
09
54
83
43
14
81
38
63
0
Ge
ne
ral
Pro
gra
m G
uid
eli
ne
s -
45
00
PA
X
Po
rt o
f S
an
Fra
nc
isc
o
Be
rth
27
Sp
ace
Allo
catio
ns
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
24
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
WAI
TING
/ C
HECK
IN(E
A)
EMBA
RK
DEBA
RK
OTHE
R
BLDG
QEUE
(EB)
PRE-
SCRE
EN
LOBB
Y(E
D)(E
E)EN
TRY
SCRE
ENIN
G
BUIL
DING
SYS
TEM
S(B
A)
M /
W T
.(B
B)
(OD)
CREW
SPA
CEPR
OVIS
IONS
STO
RAGE
(OA)
STOR
AGE
(OB)
(OC)
OFFI
CES
SECU
RITY
(OE)
(OF)
PORT
POL
ICE
BAGG
AGE
LAY
DOW
N(D
A)
FROM
M
EZZA
NINE
LE
VEL
TO
MEZ
ZANI
NE
LEVE
L
ENTR
YCB
P PR
IMAR
Y(D
B)
CBP
SECO
NDAR
Y(D
C)
TERM
INAL
BU
ILD
ING
PRO
GRAM
AD
JACE
NCI
ES:
1ST
FLO
OR
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
ADJA
CEN
CY S
TUD
IES
25
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
TERM
INAL
BU
ILD
ING
PRO
GRAM
AD
JACE
NCI
ES:
MEZ
ZAN
INE
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
ADJA
CEN
CY S
TUD
IES
EMBA
RK
DEBA
RK
OTHE
R
BLDG
WAI
TING
/ C
HECK
IN(E
A)
FROM
1S
T FL
OOR
TO S
HIP
FROM
SHI
P
TO 1
ST F
LOOR
(ON
DEBA
RK)
QEUE
(EB)
PASS
AGE
(EC)
BUILDING SYSTEMS
M / W T.
(BA)
(BB)
(OB)
STORAGE
26
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
Whi
le r
ecre
atio
n fa
cilit
ies
are
need
ed i
n th
e ar
ea,
they
are
sub
ordi
nate
to
the
crui
se t
erm
inal
and
op
en s
pace
req
uire
men
ts. R
ecre
atio
n us
es m
ay b
e ac
com
mod
ated
in
the
Pier
29
shed
, th
ough
she
d co
lum
ns m
ay r
estr
ict
a fu
ll ra
nge
of r
ecre
atio
nal
activ
ities
. Th
ere
may
be
av
aila
ble
spac
e fo
r re
crea
tiona
l use
s w
ithin
Pie
r 27
and
the
valle
y ar
ea,
prov
ided
tha
t th
ey d
o no
t in
terf
ere
with
cru
ise
func
tions
and
sec
urity
requ
irem
ents
.
A n
ew o
pen
spac
e at
Pie
r 27
was
fi r
st e
nvis
ione
d by
the
Port
Wat
erfr
ont L
and
Use
Pla
n, a
nd th
e Ba
y C
onse
rvat
ion
and
Dev
elop
men
t C
omm
issi
on’s
(BC
DC
) Spe
cial
Are
a Pl
an. T
he B
CD
C P
lan
calls
for
a n
ew N
orth
east
Wha
rf P
laza
, an
appr
oxim
atel
y tw
o-ac
re p
laza
tha
t w
ould
fun
ctio
n as
a m
ajor
att
rac
tion
for
visi
tors
and
res
iden
ts. T
o cr
eate
thi
s pl
aza,
the
Pla
n ca
lls f
or r
emov
al o
f ap
prox
imat
ely
56,0
00 s
quar
e fe
et o
f th
e Pi
er 2
7 sh
ed a
nd th
e Pi
er
27 A
nnex
bui
ldin
g, w
hile
reta
inin
g or
relo
catin
g th
e hi
stor
ic P
ier
29 B
eltli
ne Offi
ce A
nnex
. At
the
time
the
Spec
ial A
rea
Plan
was
ado
pted
, BC
DC
and
the
Port
ant
icip
ated
con
stru
ctio
n of
a m
ajor
mix
ed-
use,
rec
reat
ion
deve
lopm
ent p
roje
ct o
n Pi
ers
27-3
1,
not t
he c
ontin
ued
seco
ndar
y cr
uise
use
, nor
a n
ew
prim
ary
crui
se te
rmin
al a
t Pie
r 27.
The
Spec
ial
Are
a Pl
an
spec
ifi ca
lly
note
s th
at
“mar
itim
e ac
tiviti
es a
nd S
an F
ranc
isco
’s hi
stor
ic
pier
s ar
e in
trin
sica
lly
inte
rest
ing,
an
d pr
ovid
e m
uch
of t
he c
hara
cter
of
the
wat
erfr
ont.”
Fur
ther
, th
e Pl
an a
rgue
s th
at “
publ
ic a
cces
s, v
iew
site
s, a
nd
recr
eatio
n ar
eas a
re d
esir
able
add
ition
s to
mar
itim
e di
stri
cts,
pro
vide
d th
at t
hey
do n
ot i
nter
fere
with
m
ariti
me
func
tions
.”
Sinc
e th
e pr
ogra
m a
ssum
ptio
ns h
ave
chan
ged,
the
site
pla
nnin
g te
am h
as e
valu
ated
(and
will
con
tinue
to
) the
Pla
n’s
outli
ne o
f the
spa
ce, w
hile
res
pect
ing
the
size
and
int
ent
of t
he N
orth
east
Wha
rf P
laza
. Th
e st
udy
look
s at
whe
ther
the
con
fi gur
atio
n an
d or
ient
atio
n of
an
open
spa
ce a
rea
shou
ld r
emai
n as
sh
own
in th
e Spe
cial
Are
a Pl
an, o
r whe
ther
it sh
ould
be
re-
confi
gur
ed t
o ac
com
mod
ate
the
vehi
cula
r fl o
ws f
or cr
uise
term
inal
ope
ratio
ns a
nd a
llow
mor
e ex
pans
ive
view
s of
the
Bay.
500’
384’
BCD
C SA
N F
RAN
CISC
O W
ATER
FRO
NT
SPEC
IAL
AREA
PLA
N -
NO
RTH
EAST
WH
ARF
PLAZ
A
OPE
N S
PACE
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
“Pub
lic a
cces
s, vi
ew s
ites,
and
recr
eatio
n ar
eas
are
desir
able
addi
tions
to m
ariti
me
dist
ricts
, pro
vide
d th
ey d
o no
t int
erfer
e w
ith m
ariti
me f
unct
ions
.....
...Cr
eate
a “N
orth
east
Wha
rf Pl
aza,
” as a
new
, maj
or, d
estin
atio
n pl
aza b
etw
een
Pier
s 23
and
29 al
ong
The E
mba
rcad
ero,
open
ing
up v
iews f
rom
Lom
bard
Str
eet a
nd T
he E
mba
rcad
ero t
o the
Bay
, Ye
rba
Buen
a an
d Tr
easu
re I
sland
s, an
d th
e Ba
y Br
idge
. The
ap
prox
imat
ely 2
-acr
e pla
za sh
ould
be d
esig
ned
to fu
nctio
n as
a
maj
or att r
actio
n fo
r visi
tors
and
resid
ents
. In
addi
tion,
pro
vide
op
en sp
ace a
roun
d th
e Belt
line R
ailro
ad Offi
ce A
nnex
bui
ldin
g if
it re
mai
ns in
its p
rese
nt lo
catio
n, a
nd m
aint
ain
unob
stru
cted
vi
ews
from
the
Ann
ex a
cros
s th
e pl
aza
to t
he B
ay. T
he P
laza
sh
ould
be
orien
ted
to th
e O
pen
Wat
er B
asin
bet
wee
n Pi
ers
27
and
19.”
BCD
C SA
N F
RAN
CISC
O W
ATER
FRO
NT
SPEC
IAL
AREA
PLA
N
27
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
28
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
29
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
OPT
ION
1 -
SIN
GLE
PLA
ZA
30
OPT
ION
2 -
DO
UBL
E PL
AZA
34
TRAF
FIC
CON
CEPT
38
OPE
N S
PACE
CH
ARAC
TER
39
ARCH
ITEC
TURE
CHAR
ACTE
R
42
3 |
CO
NC
EP
TU
AL
SI
TE
PL
AN
AL
TE
RN
AT
IV
ES
30
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
Key
Poi
nts
Mai
ntai
n BC
DC
Spe
cial
Are
a Pl
an la
yout
for
a
two-
acre
uni
nter
rupt
ed o
pen
spac
e ar
ea.
Two
acce
ss p
oint
s ac
ross
the
Emba
rcad
ero.
Pr
ivat
ely-
owne
d ve
hicl
es
(PO
Vs)
, ta
xis
and
bu
ses
ente
r fr
om o
ne c
onso
lidat
ed p
oint
nea
r Pi
er 2
9 bu
lkhe
ad b
uild
ing
and
shar
e a
larg
e lo
op fl
owin
g co
unte
rclo
ckw
ise.
Pi
ck-u
p an
d dr
op-off
zone
s ar
e st
rong
ly ti
ed to
the
term
inal
bui
ldin
g la
yout
(i.e
., em
bark
atio
n on
the
nort
h, d
ebar
katio
n on
the
sout
h).
Emba
rkat
ion
area
take
s ad
vant
age
of th
e op
en
vi
ew o
f the
Bay
.Bu
s dr
op-off /
pick
-up
zone
is
cent
rally
loc
ated
next
to th
e te
rmin
al.
Prov
isio
ning
truc
ks e
nter
at P
ier
27 a
pron
and
exit
at th
e co
nsol
idat
ed p
oint
at t
he n
orth
.
Adv
anta
ges
Traffi
c l
anes
do
not
cros
s in
to t
he o
pen
spac
e
area
as
envi
sion
ed b
y BC
DC
and
Por
t pla
ns.
Prop
osed
cr
uise
te
rmin
al
layo
ut
prov
ides
oppo
rtun
ity t
o cr
eate
a d
ram
atic
em
bark
atio
n sp
ace
at m
ezza
nine
leve
l with
an
open
vie
w o
f th
e Ba
y.
This
spa
ce a
lso
prov
ides
the
opp
ortu
nity
for
alte
rnat
ive
use
on a
non
-cru
ise
day.
Bu
ses
can
back
int
o th
eir
desi
gnat
ed s
pace
s
ther
eby
not
caus
ing
pote
ntia
l ba
ck-u
p of
the
dr
ivew
ay.
Secu
red
stor
age
of p
rovi
sion
s ca
n be
co-
loca
ted
w
ith o
ther
term
inal
func
tions
, cre
atin
g a
sing
le
faci
lity.
Re
tail
spac
e al
ong
the
open
spa
ce a
rea
coul
d
have
a s
impl
e, effi
cien
t fl o
or c
onfi g
urat
ion.
D
isad
vant
ages
The
sing
le i
ngre
ss p
oint
for
PO
Vs,
tax
is a
nd
bu
ses
may
resu
lt in
traffi
c c
onge
stio
n.C
ircu
latio
n m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
mus
t fun
ctio
n
very
effi
cie
ntly
. Ba
ck-u
p of
on
e m
ode
will
ne
gativ
ely
aff e
ct th
e ot
hers
. W
hile
th
e ba
ck-in
, he
ad-o
ut
bus
oper
atio
n
wou
ld r
educ
e po
tent
ial t
raffi
c im
pact
s, s
igna
ge
wou
ld b
e ne
cess
ary
in o
rder
for
pas
seng
ers
to
iden
tify
whi
ch b
us to
boa
rd.
Bus
load
ing
in
fron
t of
th
e te
rmin
al,
but
PO
V l
oadi
ng i
s fu
rthe
r aw
ay.
This
may
be
a di
sadv
anta
ge s
ince
the
maj
ority
of
pass
enge
rs
OPT
ION
1 |
SIN
GLE
PLA
ZAO
PTIO
N 1
SIT
E PL
AN D
IAG
RAM
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
E
D
E
D
Embarcadero
Battery St
Sansome St
Ch
estn
ut
St
Lom
bar
d S
t
OPT
ION
1 O
PEN
SPA
CE F
RAM
EWO
RK
DIA
GRAM
NO
RTH
E
D
Embarcadero
Battery St
Ch
estn
ut
St
100’
020
0’40
0’
PLAZ
A
SID
EWAL
K
APR
ON
TER
MIN
AL P
EDES
TRIA
N A
REA
PRO
VISI
ON
ING
AR
EAN
ORT
H
will
be
usin
g PO
Vs a
nd w
ill h
ave
a lo
nger
wal
k to
the
term
inal
. Pr
ovis
ioni
ng t
ruck
s w
ould
ent
er a
nd p
erha
ps
qu
eue
at P
ier
27 a
pron
usi
ng a
less
pre
fera
ble
coun
terc
lock
wis
e fl o
w p
att e
rn.
A q
ueui
ng la
ne m
ay h
ave
to b
e cr
eate
d al
ong
th
e Em
barc
ader
o.
Add
ition
al p
rovi
sion
s st
orag
e m
ay b
e ne
eded
and
plac
ed a
t no
rthe
rn e
nd o
f pi
er,
poss
ibly
cr
eatin
g a
confl
ict
with
pr
ovis
ion
load
ing
oper
atio
ns.
xPE
DES
TRIA
N C
RO
SSIN
G
VIEW
CO
RR
IDO
R
31
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
Priv
atel
y-ow
ned
vehi
cles
(P
OV
), ta
xis,
an
d bu
ses
shar
e a
sing
e en
try/
exit
acce
ss p
oint
, w
hile
pr
ovis
ioni
ng
vehi
cles
en
ter
usin
g a
sepa
rate
en
tran
ce.
E
D
100’
020
0’40
0’
E
D
E
D
E
D
BUS
E
D
OPT
ION
1 C
OM
BIN
ED T
RAF
FIC
FLO
W D
IAG
RAM
OPT
ION
1 |
VEH
ICU
LAR F
LOW
PRIV
ATEL
Y -
OW
NED
VEH
ICLE
S (P
OVS
) FL
OW
DIA
GRAM
TAXI
FLO
W D
IAG
RAM
BUS
FLO
W D
IAG
RAM
PRO
VISI
ON
S FL
OW
DIA
GRAM
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
NO
RTH
NO
RTH
NO
RTH
NO
RTH
NO
RTH
32
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
Prop
osed
cr
uise
te
rmin
al
layo
ut
prov
ides
op
port
unity
to cr
eate
a d
ram
atic
em
bark
atio
n sp
ace
at m
ezza
nine
lev
el w
ith a
n op
en v
iew
of
the
Bay.
Re
tail
spac
e al
ong
the
open
spac
e ar
ea c
ould
hav
e a
sim
ple,
effi
cien
t fl o
or c
onfi g
urat
ion.
EMBA
RK
DEBA
RK
OTHE
R
BLDG
PRE-
SCRE
EN
LOBB
Y(E
D)(E
E)EN
TRY
SCRE
ENIN
G
BUIL
DING
SYS
TEM
S(B
A)
M /
W T
.(B
B)
(OD)
CREW
SPA
CEPR
OVIS
IONS
STO
RAGE
(OA)
STOR
AGE
(OB)
(OC)
OFFI
CES
SECU
RITY
(OE)
(OF)
PORT
POL
ICE
BAGG
AGE
LAY
DOW
N(D
A)
FROM
M
EZZA
NINE
LE
VEL
TO
MEZ
ZANI
NE
LEVE
L
ENTR
YCB
P PR
IMAR
Y(D
B)
CBP
SECO
NDAR
Y(D
C)
EMBA
RK
DEBA
RK
OTHE
R
BLDG
WAI
TING
/ C
HECK
IN(E
A)
FROM
1S
T FL
OOR
TO S
HIP
FROM
SHI
P
TO 1
ST F
LOOR
(ON
DEBA
RK)
QEUE
(EB)
PASS
AGE
(EC)
BUILDING SYSTEMS
M / W T.
(BA)
(BB)
(OB)
STORAGE
1-1:
Bas
ed o
n 10
sf p
er p
asse
nger
* 1-2:
Thi
s va
lue
excl
uded
in th
e su
mm
ary
build
ing
area
s*
1-1
* 1-2
* 1-3
*
Tota
l PA
X1s
t Lev
el2n
d Le
vel
Gro
up S
um
E-D
Pre-
Scre
en L
obby
2400
2400
0
E-E
Entr
y Sc
reen
ing
2400
2400
0
E-A
Emba
rk W
aitin
g/C
heck
-in15
000
015
000
E-C
Emba
rk/D
ebar
k Pa
ssag
e25
000
2500
E-B
Emba
rk Q
eue
3500
035
0025
800
D-BB
Prim
ary
CB
P 99
0099
000
D-CC
econ
dary
CB
P S
4500
4500
0
D-AA
e la
y-do
wn
Bag
gage
4500
045
000
059
400
O-C
Cru
ise
Line
Offi
ces
1500
1500
0
O-E
Secu
rity
1500
1500
0
O-F
Port
Pol
ice
1500
1500
0
O-D
Cre
w S
pace
900
900
0
O-B
Stor
age
6000
6000
0
O-A
Prov
isio
ns15
000
1500
00
2640
0
B-B
M/W
T.
4000
2400
1600
B-A
Bld
g Sy
stem
s60
0035
0025
00
Oth
er U
se21
500
Ret
ail
1500
015
000
015
000
Sub
Tota
l13
6600
1115
0025
100
1-3:
Thi
s is
a o
ne-s
tory
spa
ce w
ith h
igh
ceili
ng.
*
TERM
INAL
PRO
GRAM
S -
AREA
REQ
UIR
EMEN
TS
OPT
ION
1 T
ERM
INAL
BU
ILD
ING
FLO
W D
IAG
RAM
S
1ST
FLO
OR F
LOW
PRO
GRAM
DIA
GRAM
MEZ
ZAN
INE
FLO
W P
RO
GRAM
DIA
GRAM
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
33
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
R
50’
010
0’20
0’
FROM
M
EZZA
NINE
LE
VEL
TO
MEZ
ZANI
NE
LEVE
L
DC
DBD
EB
AR
KA
TIO
NE
MB
AR
KA
TIO
N
BB
BA
ED
EE
DA
OA
OTHE
R
ODO
B
0C
/0E
/O
F
TO
1ST
FLOO
R LE
VEL
(ON
FROM
SHI
PTO
SHI
P
FROM
1S
T FL
OOR
L
EVEL
EC
BB
BA
EA
/ E
B
1st
FLO
OR
ME
ZZ
AN
INE
DC
DB
BB
BB
BA
BA
EE
ED
EC
DA
EA
/ E
B
OA
OD
OB
R
0C
/0E
/O
F
BCDC LINE
VIEW
PRO
GRAM
AXO
NO
MET
RIC
SITE
PLA
N F
LOW
DIA
GRAM
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
NO
RTH
34
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
Max
imiz
e th
e vi
ew c
orri
dor
to t
he B
ay b
y
alig
ning
the
sout
h en
d of
the
term
inal
rou
ghly
pa
ralle
l to
Pier
23.
Tw
o ty
pes
of o
pen
spac
e ar
eas:
a t
rian
gula
r
view
ing
area
alo
ng P
ier
27 a
pron
and
a li
near
pa
rk a
long
the
Emba
rcad
ero.
D
edic
ated
taxi
loop
clo
sest
to th
e Em
barc
ader
o
for effi
cien
t cir
cula
tion
POV
en
try
sepa
rate
fr
om
taxi
s,
buse
s an
d
prov
isio
ning
. Pr
ovis
ion
spac
e on
nor
ther
n en
d of
the
Pier
27
te
rmin
al, a
way
from
the
Emba
rcad
ero.
Prim
ary
prov
isio
ning
ci
rcul
atio
n do
es
not
re
quir
e use
of P
ier 2
7 apr
on u
nles
s for
emer
genc
y or
traffi
c co
nges
tion
purp
oses
as d
eter
min
ed b
y te
rmin
al o
pera
tor.
Adv
anta
ges:
Ope
n sp
ace/
build
ing
confi
gur
atio
n cr
eate
s a
st
rong
er li
nkag
e be
twee
n th
e Em
barc
ader
o an
d th
e Ba
y, p
rovi
des
a gr
eate
r ran
ge o
f ope
n sp
ace
in t
he a
rea,
and
pro
mot
es t
he g
reat
er s
ense
of
conn
ectio
n be
twee
n th
e pu
blic
and
the
cru
ise
ship
as
an att r
actio
n.
Prov
isio
n st
orag
e sp
aces
are
sign
ifi ca
ntly
larg
er
in
this
opt
ion.
Th
ere
are
two
ingr
ess
poin
ts f
or P
OV
s, b
uses
,
taxi
s, a
nd p
rovi
sion
ing
truc
ks,
crea
ting
less
po
tent
ial
for
back
ups
on t
he E
mba
rcad
ero.
PO
Vs
wou
ld e
nter
nea
r Pi
er 2
9 w
hile
bus
es,
taxi
s an
d pr
ovis
ioni
ng tr
ucks
wou
ld e
nter
at a
se
para
te p
oint
. Pr
ovis
ioni
ng tr
ucks
can
ente
r and
unl
oad
stor
es
at
a d
esig
nate
d ar
ea.
At
that
poi
nt,
fork
lift s
w
ould
be
used
to
serv
ice
the
crui
se v
esse
ls.
Ther
e is
add
ition
al fl
exib
ility
to u
se th
e Pi
er 2
7 ap
ron
entr
y po
int i
f nec
essa
ry.
POV
load
ing
wou
ld b
e at
the
fron
t of t
erm
inal
.
Sinc
e th
e am
ount
of p
asse
nger
s usi
ng P
OV
s are
al
mos
t tw
ice
as la
rge
as th
ose
usin
g bu
ses,
this
la
yout
wou
ld b
e th
e pr
efer
red
optio
n.
Dis
adva
ntag
es:
Cha
nges
to
th
e BC
DC
Sp
ecia
l A
rea
Plan
’s
confi
gur
atio
n w
ill
requ
ire
a co
nfi r
mat
ion
proc
ess
with
BC
DC
. W
ith t
wo
(pos
sibl
y th
ree)
acc
ess
poin
ts, t
here
wou
ld b
e gr
eate
r po
tent
ial
for
vehi
cula
r an
d pe
dest
rian
co
nfl ic
ts.
This
im
pact
co
uld
be
miti
gate
d by
the l
ikel
y us
e of a
traffi
c m
anag
er(s
) du
ring
pea
k cr
uise
tim
es.
Bus l
oadi
ng a
rea
is w
ithin
a sh
ort d
ista
nce t
o th
e
exiti
ng d
rive
way
and
bus
es w
ould
bac
k in
to th
e dr
ivew
ay. H
owev
er, b
us b
acku
p m
aneu
veri
ng
may
cau
se b
acku
p of
all
exiti
ng v
ehic
les.
A
wid
er o
r a tw
o-la
ne d
rive
way
at t
his
loca
tion
sh
ould
be
cons
ider
ed.
Prov
isio
ns s
tora
ge is
sep
arat
ed f
rom
the
oth
er
bu
ildin
g fu
nctio
ns in
an
adja
cent
bui
ldin
g.
OPT
ION
2 S
ITE
PLAN
DIA
GRAM
OPT
ION
2 |
DO
UBL
E PL
AZA
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
OPT
ION
2 O
PEN
SPA
CE D
IAG
RAM
E
D
E
D
Embarcadero
Battery St
Sansome St
nu
t St
Lom
bar
d S
t
100’
020
0’40
0
E
D
Embarcadero
Battery St
Sansome St
Ch
estn
ut S
t
Lom
bar
d S
t
Sansome
Lom
bar
d S
t
100’
020
0’40
0’
PLAZ
A
SIDE
WAL
K
APRO
N
TERM
INAL
PED
ESTR
IAN
AREA
PROV
ISIO
NING
ARE
A
NO
RTH
NO
RTH
xPE
DES
TRIA
N C
RO
SSIN
G
VIEW
CO
RR
IDO
R
35
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
E
D
E
D
BUS
QUEU
E
E
D
OPT
ION
1 C
OM
BIN
ED T
RAF
FIC
FLO
W D
IAG
RAM
OPT
ION
2 |
VEH
ICU
LAR F
LOW
POV
FLO
W D
IAG
RAM
TAXI
FLO
W D
IAG
RAM
BUS
FLO
W D
IAG
RAM
PRO
VISI
ON
S FL
OW
DIA
GRAM
Priv
atel
y-ow
ned
vehi
cles
(PO
V)
have
a s
epar
ate
entr
y fr
om t
axis
and
bus
es. P
rovi
sion
ing
vehi
cles
ca
n ei
ther
use
the
tax
i/bus
ent
ranc
e or
a t
hird
, se
para
te e
ntra
nce.
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
0’
Battery St
hes
tnu
t St
hE
D
100’
020
0’40
0’NO
RTH
NO
RTH
NO
RTH
NO
RTH
NO
RTH
E
D
36
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
1-3:
Thi
s is
a o
ne-s
tory
spa
ce w
ith h
igh
ceili
ng.
*2-1:
Bas
ed o
n 10
sf p
er p
asse
nger
* 2-2:
Thi
s is
a o
ne-s
tory
spa
ce w
ith h
igh
ceili
ng.
*
2-1
* 2-2
*
Tota
l PAX
1st L
evel
2nd
Leve
lG
roup
Sum
E-D
Pre-
Scre
en L
obby
2400
2400
0
E-E
Entr
y Sc
reen
ing
2400
2400
0
E-A
Emba
rk W
aitin
g/C
heck
-in22
000
5000
1700
0
E-C
Emba
rk/D
ebar
k Pa
ssag
e20
000
2000
E-B
Emba
rk Q
eue
7500
4000
3500
3630
0
D-B
CB
P Pr
imar
y99
0099
000
D-C
CB
P Se
cond
ary
4500
4500
0
D-A
Bag
gage
lay-
dow
n45
000
4500
00
5940
0
O-C
Cru
ise
Line
Offi
ces
1500
1500
0
O-E
Secu
rity
1500
1500
0
O-F
Port
Pol
ice
1500
1500
0
O-D
Cre
w S
pace
800
800
0
O-B
Stor
age
1350
012
000
1500
O-A
Prov
isio
ns28
000
2800
00
4680
0
B-B
M/W
T.
4000
2500
1500
B-A
Bld
g Sy
stem
s60
0035
0025
00
Ret
ail
1500
015
000
015
000
Sub
Tota
l16
7500
1395
0028
000
WAI
TING
/ C
HECK
IN(E
A)
EMBA
RK
DEBA
RK
OTHE
R
BLDG
QEUE
(EB)
PRE-
SCRE
EN
LOBB
Y(E
D)(E
E)EN
TRY
SCRE
ENIN
G
BUIL
DING
SYS
TEM
S(B
A)
M /
W T
.(B
B)
(OD)
CREW
SPA
CEPR
OVIS
IONS
STO
RAGE
(OA)
STOR
AGE
(OB)
(OC)
OFFI
CES
SECU
RITY
(OE)
(OF)
PORT
POL
ICE
BAGG
AGE
LAY
DOW
N(D
A)
FROM
M
EZZA
NINE
LE
VEL
TO
MEZ
ZANI
NE
LEVE
L
ENTR
YCB
P PR
IMAR
Y(D
B)
CBP
SECO
NDAR
Y(D
C)
EMBA
RK
DEBA
RK
OTHE
R
BLDG
WAI
TING
/ C
HECK
IN(E
A)
FROM
1S
T FL
OOR
TO S
HIP
FROM
SHI
P
TO 1
ST F
LOOR
(ON
DEBA
RK)
QEUE
(EB)
PASS
AGE
(EC)
BUILDING SYSTEMS
M / W T.
(BA)
(BB)
(OB)
STORAGE
POV
lo
adin
g,
whi
ch
deliv
ers
twic
e as
m
any
pass
enge
rs a
s bu
ses,
wou
ld b
e at
the
fro
nt o
f te
rmin
al. P
rovi
sion
sto
rage
spa
ces
are
sign
ifi ca
ntly
la
rger
in th
is o
ptio
n.
TERM
INAL
PRO
GRAM
S -
AREA
REQ
UIR
EMEN
TS
OPT
ION
2 T
ERM
INAL
BU
ILD
ING
FLO
W D
IAG
RAM
S
1ST
FLO
OR F
LOW
PRO
GRAM
DIA
GRAM
MEZ
ZAN
INE
FLO
W P
RO
GRAM
DIA
GRAM
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
37
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
50’
010
0’20
0’
1st
FLO
OR
ME
ZZ
AN
INE
TO
MEZ
ZANI
NE
LEVE
LFR
OM
MEZ
ZANI
NE
LEVE
L
ENTR
Y
ED
OD
BA
RD
AO
A
OB
DC
DB
BB
EE
EA
E
B
OC
/OE
/O
F
EC
BB EA
/ E
B
BA
OB
FROM
1S
T FL
OOR
FROM
SHI
PTO
SHI
P
TO
1ST
FLOO
R
LEVE
L
DE
BA
RK
AT
ION
EM
BA
RK
AT
ION
ED
EC
EA
/ E
B
EA
/ E
B
OD
R
DA
OA
OB
OB
DC
DB
BB
BA
BA
BB
EE
OC
/OE
/O
F
VIEW
BBBBBBBBBBBB
PRO
GRAM
AXO
NO
MET
RIC
SITE
PLA
N F
LOW
DIA
GRAM
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
NO
RTH
38
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
pie
r 27
pie
r 29
elim
inat
e le
ft t
urn
from
Lom
bard
St
exte
nd m
edia
n an
d ad
d pa
lms
exte
nd m
edia
n an
d ad
d pa
lms
add
right
tur
n qu
euin
g la
ne a
t th
e Em
barc
ader
o
mai
ntai
n bi
ke la
ne o
n th
e Em
barc
ader
o
elim
inat
e le
ft t
urn
from
Em
barc
ader
oso
uth
boun
d
elim
inat
e le
ft t
urn
out
from
Pie
r 27
right
turn
out
right
turn
in
CON
CEPT
UAL
EM
BACA
DER
O T
RAF
FIC
IMPR
OVE
MEN
TS
POTE
NTI
AL T
RAF
FIC
FLO
W C
HAN
GES
- C
ON
CEPT
DIA
GRAM
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
NO
RTH
39
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
As a
gat
eway
into
San
Fra
ncis
co, a
s wel
l as t
he cr
uise
sh
ips,
the
ope
n sp
ace
and
arch
itect
ural
cha
ract
er
shou
ld b
e di
stin
ctly
con
text
ual.
The
re i
s a
rich
ex
istin
g ch
arac
ter
to S
an F
ranc
isco
’s Em
barc
ader
o w
ater
fron
t, th
at s
houl
d se
rve
as i
nspi
ratio
n fo
r th
e op
en s
pace
and
bui
ldin
g co
ncep
ts.
Thi
s is
a
wor
king
wat
erfr
ont a
nd th
e ch
arac
ter s
houl
d refl e
ct
that
mar
itim
e qu
ality
. Si
mila
rly,
the
fun
ctio
nalit
y of
the
ter
min
al s
houl
d be
the
pri
mar
y dr
iver
of
the
spac
e -
char
acte
r sh
ould
be
expr
essi
ve o
f th
is
dyna
mic
, and
cont
rast
to th
e m
ore
open
and
fl ex
ible
na
ture
of t
he p
laza
.
Gra
de a
nd E
dge
Con
cept
sTh
e su
cces
s of
the
site
dep
ends
on
max
imiz
ing
the
oppo
rtun
ities
of
the
edge
s.
The
limita
tions
of
plan
ting
on s
truc
ture
mea
n th
at h
ards
cape
and
st
ruct
ural
ele
men
ts w
ill b
e th
e do
min
ant
devi
ces
for
spat
ial
defi n
ition
. In
the
pla
za,
the
four
foo
t gr
ade
tran
sitio
n is
an
oppo
rtun
ity t
o us
e st
eps
and
ram
ps a
s pl
acem
akin
g, f
ram
ing
elem
ents
for
ga
ther
ing
spac
es,
as w
ell
as a
ctiv
e sp
aces
in
and
of t
hem
selv
es.
Rest
aura
nt a
nd r
etai
l ac
tivity
will
al
so e
ngag
e pe
ople
, dra
win
g th
em in
to t
he p
laza
s fr
om th
e st
reet
. Th
e w
ater
’s ed
ge is
ano
ther
nat
ural
att
rac
tion.
Gra
de t
rans
ition
cou
ld b
e al
so u
tiliz
ed
here
to s
tren
gthe
n th
e se
nse
of s
pace
.
OPE
N S
PACE
CH
ARAC
TER -
GRAD
E CO
NCE
PTS
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
40
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
OPE
N S
PACE
CH
ARAC
TER -
STR
UCT
URE
CON
CEPT
S
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
Sinc
e th
e us
e of
tree
s an
d ot
her
spac
e de
fi nin
g ve
geta
tion
is li
mite
d on
-str
uctu
re, r
e-us
ing
elem
ents
of t
he
exis
ting
build
ings
wou
ld b
e a
usef
ul a
ltern
ativ
e ve
rtic
al e
lem
ent.
This
can
hel
p tr
ansi
tion
betw
een
inte
rior
an
d ex
teri
or, p
unct
uate
spac
es, a
nd p
oten
tially
pro
vide
shad
e/ra
in co
ver.
This
type
of a
dapt
ive
re-u
se w
ould
al
so le
nd a
uthe
ntic
his
tori
c ch
arac
ter,
as w
ell a
s co
ntri
bute
to a
sus
tain
able
app
roac
h.
41
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
3 |
conc
eptu
al s
ite p
lan
alte
rnat
ives
OPE
N S
PACE
CH
ARAC
TER -
PRO
GRAM
CO
NCE
PTS
Whi
le t
he s
ite w
ill off e
r its
ow
n in
nate
dra
w w
ith t
he p
roxi
mity
of
the
big
ship
s, a
dditi
on p
rogr
amm
ing
can
build
on
this
to c
reat
e a
vibr
ant,
activ
e ga
ther
ing
spac
e. T
he p
laza
s sh
ould
be
desi
gned
with
eno
ugh
fl exi
bilit
y to
supp
ort m
ultip
le p
rogr
ams,
as w
ell a
s with
act
ivity
gen
erat
ors s
uch
as fo
od v
endo
rs. P
rogr
ams
incl
ude
ship
vie
win
g, c
asua
l gat
heri
ng, l
unch
sea
ting,
inte
grat
ed a
nd in
tera
ctiv
e ar
t, an
d sp
ecia
l eve
nts.
42
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
ARCH
ITEC
TURAL
CH
ARAC
TER C
ON
CEPT
S
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
As
a bu
ildin
g ty
pe, t
he te
rmin
al m
ust p
rovi
de fu
nctio
nalit
y fo
r its
use
rs, b
ut it
als
o off
ers
gre
at o
ppor
tuni
ty
for
expr
essi
on o
f fo
rm,
cont
extu
al m
ater
ials
, pr
eced
ence
of
hist
ory,
asp
ects
of
light
, co
lor,
volu
me
and
the
pote
ntia
l to
info
rm it
s si
te a
nd e
nvir
onm
ent.
Tra
nsie
nt b
uild
ings
like
this
term
inal
pro
vide
thei
r ow
n pr
eced
ents
and
cue
s, c
onsi
sten
t with
thei
r con
text
s. T
hese
bui
ldin
gs c
an b
e us
eful
exa
mpl
e fo
r thi
s ter
min
al
and
war
rant
stu
dy d
urin
g th
e cr
eatio
n of
the
term
inal
arc
hite
ctur
e.
43
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
2 |
site
cha
ract
eris
tics
& c
onst
rain
ts
44
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
45
Co
nc
ep
tua
l S
ite
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
dy
The
goal
of
the
Pier
27
crui
se t
erm
inal
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s is
to d
evel
op a
pro
ject
that
mee
ts m
ariti
me
need
s, w
hile
als
o be
ing
succ
essf
ully
ent
itled
and
fu
nded
. Th
is s
ite p
lann
ing
exer
cise
has
ide
ntifi
ed
the
chal
leng
es f
or a
new
, pri
mar
y cr
uise
ter
min
al
and
has
deta
iled
the
com
petin
g co
ncer
ns. C
lear
ly,
not
all o
f th
e is
sues
hav
e be
en r
esol
ved.
As
note
d ea
rlie
r, Po
rt s
taff
inte
nds
to s
olic
it co
mm
unity
and
re
gula
tory
resp
onse
to th
e cru
ise t
erm
inal
site
pla
ns.
Base
d on
that
inpu
t, Po
rt st
aff w
ill re
turn
to th
e Po
rt
Com
mis
sion
with
eith
er a
pre
ferr
ed s
ite p
lan
or a
m
ore
deta
iled
set o
f dev
elop
men
t cri
teri
a. P
ort s
taff
wou
ld th
en r
ecom
men
d in
itiat
ing
the
next
sta
ge o
f th
e de
sign
pro
cess
, dev
elop
ing
mor
e de
taile
d pl
ans
at a
larg
er s
cale
.
Base
d on
em
ergi
ng d
evel
opm
ent
crite
ria,
det
aile
d pl
ans
will
ulti
mat
ely
have
to
addr
ess:
fi r
stly
, th
e ap
pear
ance
, opt
imal
func
tiona
lity
and
adap
tabi
lity
of P
ier
27 t
o be
com
e th
e pr
imar
y cr
uise
ter
min
al
faci
lity;
sec
ondl
y, w
hich
Lea
ders
hip
in E
nerg
y an
d En
viro
nmen
tal
Des
ign
(LEE
D)
reco
mm
enda
tions
can
be i
nclu
ded
to a
chie
ve a
sus
tain
able
, gr
een
proj
ect;
and,
thi
rdly
, how
to
crea
te a
n op
en s
pace
ar
ea t
hat
give
s it
a “s
ense
of
plac
e” y
et s
uppo
rts
the
func
tiona
l ne
eds
of a
cru
ise
term
inal
fac
ility
. In
add
ition
, th
e si
te p
lann
ing
proc
ess
coul
d be
ex
pand
ed t
o in
clud
e th
e Pi
er 2
9 sh
ed, a
nd h
ow it
m
ight
eve
ntua
lly b
e in
tegr
ated
int
o th
e Pi
er 2
7 cr
uise
term
inal
pro
ject
.
Succ
essf
ul r
esol
utio
n of
thes
e de
sign
ele
men
ts w
ill
be d
epen
dent
on
proj
ect
fund
ing.
Cur
rent
ly,
the
Port
has
fund
ing
of a
ppro
xim
atel
y $1
9.3
mill
ion
for
this
pro
ject
. Thi
s am
ount
incl
udes
fun
ds f
rom
the
W
ater
mar
k de
ferr
ed la
nd s
ale
proc
eeds
, the
Por
t’s
shar
e of p
rofi t
s fro
m in
divi
dual
cond
omin
ium
sale
s,
and
accr
ued
inte
rest
ear
ning
s. D
urin
g th
e C
ruis
e Te
rmin
al A
dvis
ory
Pane
l pro
cess
, Por
t staff
prep
ared
an
ext
rem
ely
prel
imin
ary
proj
ect
cost
est
imat
e of
ap
prox
imat
ely
$60
mill
ion
to d
evel
op t
his
proj
ect.
How
ever
, de
taile
d de
sign
and
eng
inee
ring
pla
ns
are
need
ed t
o de
term
ine
a m
ore
real
istic
pro
ject
co
st.
The
Port
Com
mis
sion
will
hav
e to
pro
vide
4 |
NE
XT
ST
EP
S
dire
ctio
n w
heth
er th
e cru
ise t
erm
inal
pro
ject
bud
get
is li
mite
d to
the
amou
nt o
f fun
ds cu
rren
tly a
vaila
ble
or w
heth
er a
dditi
onal
fund
s ca
n be
bud
gete
d.
conc
lusi
ons
46
Pie
r 2
7 C
ruis
e T
erm
ina
l
Con
sult
ant
Team
:Ba
y Ar
ea E
cono
mic
sED
AW/A
ECO
MD
MJM
Des
ign
Port
s an
d M
ariti
me
Gro
upCH
S Co
nsul
ting
Gro
upRo
bin
Chia
ng &
Com
pany
