PhilMolBio L3

download PhilMolBio L3

of 11

Transcript of PhilMolBio L3

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    1/11

    03/05/2013

    1

    PhilosophyandEthicsof

    MolecularBiology

    Lecture3Dr.SamuelSchindler

    CenterforScienceStudies

    DepartmentofPhysicsandAstronomy

    AarhusUniversity

    1

    Preliminaries

    Explainvs.

    assess

    Queries:good!

    Reminderforpresenters:

    Handouttotutor24hrsbeforepresentation!

    Printoutthehandouts

    SeealsoAULAondesignofhandouts

    2

    Preliminaries

    Newseminarinstructions

    Inadditiontorequiredtext,readonepresentation

    text(assignmentinseminars)

    Identifyoneargument (informally)and/orcome

    upwithaquestion forthepresenters

    Seminarbehaviour/workethics

    3

    Todaystopic

    Thephenomenonofaltruism

    Units/levelsofselection

    R.Dawkinsview:theunitofselectionisnot

    theorganismbutthegene

    AttacksonDawkinsview

    4

    Recall Thetheoryofevolution;twobasicprinciples

    Variation (individualdifferences)

    Naturalselection(limitedfoodresources,competition,environmentalchanges,etc.)

    Traditionalunitsofselection: Theindividualorganism(cf.Darwin1859/

    standardview!)

    Groups ofindividuals(e.g.K.Lorentz)

    Entirespecies(S.J.Gould)

    5

    Darwinsview

    InDarwinsview,naturalselection

    operatesonindividuals

    E.g.fastantelopes

    Intheancestralpopulationtherewas

    varietyofantelopeswithdifferentspeeds

    Yet,theslowoneswereweededoutby

    predators

    Onlythefastonessurvived(and

    procreated)

    6

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    2/11

    03/05/2013

    2

    Darwinsview

    Problem

    with

    this

    picture:

    altruism

    Someanimalssacrificethemselvestosavethemembersoftheirgroup/species

    Examples:bees stingingintruders(killsthemselves);birds givingalarmcalls(focusingthepredatorsattentiononthem)

    Note:iftheindividualistheunitofselection,whywouldtheindividualsacrificeitselfforotherindividuals?

    7

    Darwinsview

    Darwin

    suggested

    that

    altruism

    makes

    sensefromtheevolutionaryperspectivebecauseitsavesgroups ofindividuals

    Otherdefenders:Konrad Lorentz

    Note:thisisinconsistent withhisoverallviewthatselectionworksonindividuals,ratherthangroups!

    Thelatteristhestandardview

    Infact,thestandardviewrendersaltruismevenunlikely.

    8

    Individualismandaltruism

    Supposethat

    agroupconsistsofindividualswhoregularly

    exhibitaltruisticbehaviortowardstheirgroup

    peers

    thereareonlyfewegoisticindividualsinthose

    groups

    thealtruistic/egoistic traitisinherited

    Then

    9

    Individualismandaltruism

    Theegoisticindividualshaveaselective

    advantageoveraltruisticonesinthatgroup:

    Theycanbenefitfromthealtruisticbehavioroftheir

    peerswithout havingtoexposethemselvestorisks

    Becauseegoisticbehaviorisadvantageousinthe

    survivalofthefittest,overtime,altruismwill

    disappearinthosegroups

    Hence,evenifaltruismdoesoccasionallyoccur,it

    isgoingtoselectedagainstbyevolution!

    10

    Individualismand

    altruism

    theoptions:

    1. Altruisticbehaviorisachimera

    Optionadoptedbymanybiologists/theoristsof

    evolution

    2. Altruisticbehaviorisrealandneedstobe

    explained

    whatwellfocusonhere

    11

    Puzzle:

    Howcanweaccommodatealtruism

    onthetheoryofevolution?

    RichardDawkinsanswer:

    Wecandothatbymakinggenes,not

    organisms,theunitofselection

    12

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    3/11

    03/05/2013

    3

    RichardDawkins

    Dawkins:The

    Selfish

    Gene

    Published1976

    Earlycareer:zoologist

    ProfessorforPublicUnderstanding

    ofScienceatOxford(19952008)

    Otherpublications

    Theblindwatchmaker

    TheGodillusion

    13

    Theselfishgene

    From

    the

    perspective

    of

    the

    genes

    eye,

    altruism

    makesperfectlysense:

    Individualssacrificethemselvesinordertosavethegroupbecause

    Thesurvivalchanceofparticulargenes (thattheindividualshareswiththegroup)isincreased!

    Afteranattackerhasbeenfoughtoffandthegroupsavedbyanindividual:

    thegenefrequencyinthegenepoolisincreased(attheexpenseoftheorganism)

    14

    Furtherreasonswhythegene

    shouldbetheunitofselection.

    1. JunkDNAmakesnosenseonthestandard

    viewofevolution(w/individuals=units)

    2. Onlygeneshavetherightcharacteristics

    requiredbythetheoryofevolution

    15

    Furtherreasons(1)

    Anotherargumentagainsttheindividual

    organismasunitofselection

    Theexistenceofnoncoding/junkDNA:98%of

    ourgenome!

    Fromtheperspectiveoftheorganism

    since

    junk

    DNA

    has

    no

    function

    for

    the

    organism/species thereisnogoodexplanation

    forwhyorganismsshouldkeepinheritingjunk

    DNA

    16

    Furtherreasons

    (1)

    Ongeneeyeview(p.44/45)

    ThetruepurposeofDNAisnotthebuildingof

    organisms(inwhichtheyreside)

    Rather:thesolepurposeofDNAisittosurvive!

    JunkDNAisparasitic;itisaharmlessbutuseless

    passenger,hitchingaride!

    17

    Furtherreasons

    (2)

    Theunitofselectionmust

    havelotsofcopies

    Otherwise:smallchanceofsurvival

    havethepotentialtosurviveforasignificant

    periodofevolutionarytime(>longevity)

    Neitherorganisms,norspecieshavethe

    secondcharacteristic

    18

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    4/11

    03/05/2013

    4

    Furtherreasons(2)

    Each

    individual

    is

    unique.

    You

    cannot

    get

    evolutionbyselectingbetweenentitieswhenthereisonlyonecopyofeachentity!

    Eachindividualhasveryspecificcharacteristics: e.g.onlyoneleg

    Sexualreproductionisnotreplication.(34)

    Weinheritonly50%ofourgeneticmaterialtoourprogeny

    Afterafewgenerations: hardlyanyproportioninyourdescendantsofwhatmadeYOU

    19

    Furtherreasons(2)

    Individualsare

    not

    stable

    things,

    they

    are

    fleeting.genesareforever(35)

    Genesare(normally)notdividedwhenpassed

    fromonegenerationtothenext

    Ofcourse:geneswillnotliterallylastforever

    justlongenoughtofunctionasaunitof

    naturalselection

    contrarytoorganisms

    20

    Theselfishgene

    Genesarereplicators

    Onlytheytrulyreplicate

    Organismsaremerelyvehicles ofgenes

    Also:interactors

    Theymerelyarethegenesmeans totheendofsurvival

    Genesareselfishbecausealltheycareaboutistheir

    own

    survival Theyproduceorganisms/vehiclesonlyinordertosurvive

    Note:thisiswhatDawkinsthinksitisreasonabletoinfer

    21

    Theselfishgene

    IfweweretoldthatamanhadlivedalongandprosperouslifeintheworldofChicagogangsters,wewouldbeentitledtomakesomeguessesastothesortofmanhewas.Wemightexpectthathewouldhavequalitiessuchastoughness,aquicktriggerfinger,andtheabilitytoattractloyalfriends.

    Thesewould

    not

    be

    infallible

    deductions,

    butyoucanmakesomeinferencesaboutaman'scharacterifyouknowsomethingabouttheconditions inwhichhehassurvivedandprospered.

    22

    Theselfish

    gene

    Theargumentofthisbookisthatwe,andallotheranimals,aremachinescreatedbyourgenes.LikesuccessfulChicagogangsters,ourgeneshavesurvived,insomecasesformillionsofyears,inahighlycompetitiveworld.Thisentitlesustoexpectcertainqualitiesinourgenes.Ishallarguethatapredominantqualitytobeexpectedinasuccessfulgeneisruthlessselfishness.Thisgeneselfishnesswillusuallygiverisetoselfishnessinindividualbehaviour.

    23

    Genes

    and

    the

    primeval

    soup

    ThegenesstruggleofsurvivalNOW(inorganisms)isnotmuchdifferentfromwhatitusedtobeatthebeginningoflifeonEarth!

    Intheprimevalsoupreplicatorsarosebyaccident(15ff.),diversifiedthroughreplicationerrors,andcompetedagainsteachother

    Replicatorswithnumerousreplications(fecundity),lasting replication(longevity)andaccurate replication(fidelity)wonout

    24

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    5/11

    03/05/2013

    5

    Theselfishgene

    The

    selfishness of

    genes

    often

    directly

    translatesintothebehaviour oforganisms

    Prayingmantis:femalebitesofftheheadofmaleafterorevenduringcopulation

    Inordertofeedherself(andinordertoincreasethemalessexualperformance!)

    Emperorpenguins:sometimespushtheirpeersintothesea

    Inordertotestwhethertherearesealsinthewater(whomightkillthem)

    25

    Theselfishgene

    Butnote:

    the

    selfishness

    of

    the

    gene

    doesnotnecessarilyimplythat

    organismsbeselfish

    Geneselfishnessisverymuch

    compatiblewithaltruistic behaviour

    Helpingotherorganismsofthesame

    speciesisameanstotheendofreplicating

    genesofthesamekind

    26

    Howselfisharegenes?

    Thegene isthebasicunitofselfishness

    Infact:Genesarecompetingdirectlywiththeir

    allelesforsurvival,sincetheirallelesinthegene

    poolarerivalsfortheirslotonthechromosomeof

    futuregenerations.

    at

    the

    gene

    level,

    altruism

    must

    be

    bad

    and

    selfishnessgood(36)

    27

    Howselfisharegenes?

    Trulyruthlesslyselfishgenes:outlaw

    genes

    Noregardforwhethertheirreplicationis

    ofanybenefittotheorganismornot

    Examples:

    JunkDNA

    Drivinggenesthatdistortmeiosisintheir

    ownfavour,sothattheyhaveagreater

    chanceofmakingitintogametes

    28

    Howselfish

    are

    genes?

    Important:Dawkinsconceptionofselfishgenesdoesnotimply thatgenesnevercooperate

    Genesmayservetheirowninterestsbestbycooperatingwithothergenes(p.37) Hence:selfishnessthroughcooperation

    E.g.:buildingalegcannotbedonebyasingle gene Butasinglegenewillprofitfromorganisms

    thatrunfast!

    29

    Howselfish

    are

    genes?

    Yet,singlegenesmayverywellmakea

    differencetothephenotype

    E.g.thelength oflegs

    Analogy:plantfertilizer

    Otherthingsbeingequal,plantfertilizermake

    plantsgrow

    Otherimportantfactors:seed,soil,sun,water,

    etc./onlyiftheyarepresent,doesthefertilizer

    makeadifferencetoplantgrowth

    30

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    6/11

    03/05/2013

    6

    Howselfisharegenes?

    Dawkins

    compares

    gene

    selectionism to

    the

    coachsselectionofoarsmen(i.e.,rowers)inboatracing

    Thecoach hastopickanidealteam

    Assemblesthreecrews andshufflesthemembersrandomlyandletsthemraceagainsteachother

    Itturnsoutthat,onaverage,therearesomeindividualsthattendtobeinthewinningboats,andsomewhotendtobeintheloosingones

    31

    Howselfisharegenes?

    Analogy

    to

    gene

    selection

    Oarsmen =genes

    Rivaloarsmenforaseatintheboat=allele

    Rowingfast=buildingavehiclewhichissuccessfulatsurviving

    Coach=naturalselection

    Note:anygene(goodandbadones)mustcooperate withothersinordertorowfast Cooperation isintheirselfinterest

    32

    TasksandQuestions Explainwhyaltruism isproblematiconthe

    standardviewofevolution

    ExplainDawkinsargumentsforwhythegeneshouldbeviewedastheunit ofselection(ratherthantheorganism);mention

    Altruism

    JunkDNA

    Characteristicsrequiredbyevolution

    Inparticular:longevity

    33

    WhoagreeswithDawkins?

    Handsup!

    34

    Argumentsagainstthegenes

    eyeviewofevolution

    1. Dawkinsgeneconcept

    2. AcrucialambiguityunderminingDawkinsaccount?

    3. Developmentalsystems

    35

    Whatsagene

    acc.

    to

    Dawkins?

    Evolutionarygeneconception(fromWilliams)

    Ageneisdefinedasanyportionofchromosomal

    materialthatpotentially lastsforenough

    generationstoserveasaunitofnaturalselection

    (p.28)

    Note:veryloose definitionindeed!

    Nomentionofanymolecularmechanisms(such

    astranslation/transcriptionetc.)

    'thegenemayvaryinlength

    36

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    7/11

    03/05/2013

    7

    Theevolutionarygeneconcept

    The

    shorter

    the

    genetic

    unit,

    the

    more

    likelyitistosurvive(p.29)

    Consider

    Ageneticunitofhalfthesizeofachromosome:thereisa50%chancethatitwillbesplitaftereachmeiosis

    Ageneticunitof1%ofthesizeofachromosome:1%chanceofsurvivalaftereachmeiosis

    So:sizematters!

    37

    Theevolutionarygeneconcept

    Note:the

    evolutionary

    gene

    concept

    is

    compatiblewithnucleotidesbeinggenes!

    Theyaretheshortest portionofchromosomal

    materialthatpotentiallylastsforgenerations

    Plus:theycanfunctionasunitsofselection

    Butthatsofcourseabsurd;nucleotidesare

    notgenes

    Yet,itfollowsfromDawkinsdefinition!

    38

    Theevolutionarygeneconcept

    Dawkinsreaction:

    Itwouldbeabsurdtosaythatthedifferenttypes

    ofnucleotidescompete witheachother

    andthatnucleotidesofthesametypeco

    operatewitheachother

    If[nucleotides]

    are

    competitors

    at

    all,

    they

    are

    competitorsforeachlocusseparately.Theyare

    indifferenttothefateoftheirexactreplicasat

    otherloci.(1982,p.91)

    39

    Theevolutionarygeneconcept

    CriticismbyGriffithsandNeumannHeld(1999)

    Dawkinsonallelesofthesametype:nocompetition

    Dawkinsonnucleotidesofthesametype:competition

    Hence:Dawkins

    is

    inconsistent!

    Whyistherecompetition b/wnucleotidesofthesametypebutnocompetitionb/wallelesofthesametype?

    40

    Theevolutionary

    gene

    concept

    Notealso:cooperationbetweensametypesof

    genes/alleles isrequiredforexplaining

    altruism!

    Onlyifthereiscooperationatadistance

    betweengenescanweexplainfromthegenes

    eyeviewwhydifferentorganisms(withsimilar

    genes)cooperate

    Again:whatsthejustificationforthis?

    41

    Anothercriticism:Dawkinsview

    isunderminedbyanambiguity

    42

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    8/11

    03/05/2013

    8

    Animportantambiguity

    Soberpoints

    out

    that

    there

    is

    an

    important

    distinctiontobemadebetween

    SelectionforX Xs survivebecause evolutionselectsforthem

    SelectionofX Xs survivenot becauseevolutionselectedfor

    them,butbecauseforsomeotherreason

    43

    Illustrativeexample

    Selection

    forball

    size

    i.e.causalselection

    Selectionofballcolour

    i.e.,correlativeselection

    E.SobercriticizesDawkinsfornotdistinguishingbetweenselectionforgenesandtheselectionofgenes

    44

    Animportantambiguity

    Selectionforgenes

    Organismssurvivebecause theyhavecertaingenes

    Sober:notcorrect!Rather:b/corganismshavecertainproperties

    Selectionofgenes

    Organismssurvive

    because

    they

    have

    certain

    features whichareadaptedtotheenvironmentandthosefeaturesarecausedbygenes

    Sober:triviallytrue/widelyaccepted!

    45

    Acounterexample?

    Selectionforgenes=false

    Counterexample:sicklecellanemia

    andMalaria

    Heterozygotes withasicklecellallele

    andanormalallelearemorelikelyto

    surviveMalaria

    than

    homozygotes

    withtwonormalalleles

    Anemiasymptoms:minimal

    46

    Acounterexample?

    Sober:whatsbeingselectedforis

    thegenotype(heterozygote),not

    forparticulargenes(i.e.,alleles)

    Howeverthereisofcourseselection

    ofalleles

    47

    Acounterexample?

    Note:selectionofgenesiscompatiblewithselectionforindividuals

    Itisthevehicles/interactors thatfeeltheforceoftheenvironment(i.e.,naturalselection),notthegenes

    Itisthevehiclesthatare,orarenot,adapted totheirenvironments,notthegenes

    Itistruethat,ultimately,evolutionischangeofgenefrequenciesinthegenepoolovertime

    Butthissaysnothingaboutwhycertaingenesareselected

    48

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    9/11

    03/05/2013

    9

    ReplytoSober

    Sterelny andKitcher (1988)

    Theyargue:ifconstruedcorrectly,Sobers alleged

    counterexamplecanbeturnedintoaconfirmation

    ofDawkinsview!

    Crux:theexampleturnsonthefrequency ofthe

    respectiveallelesinthegenepool

    Inotherwords:geneselectionisfrequency

    dependent

    49

    ReplytoSober

    A

    sickle

    cell

    allele

    will

    be

    fitter in

    contexts in

    whichthenormalalleleforhemoglobinoccursfrequently

    Because:insuchcontextsthesicklecellheterozygoteismorelikelythanthesicklecellhomozygote

    And,organismswithasicklecellalleleandanormalallelewillhaveabetterchancetosurviveMalaria

    Hence:thesicklecellallelewillbeselectedfor

    50

    ReplytoSober

    Yetincontexts inwhichthesicklecellalleleisfrequent,thesicklecellallelewillbeunfit

    Thentheorganismisatahighrisktodieofsicklecellanemia

    Hence:normalallelewillbeselectedfor

    Thus,itisnottruethat,asSoberclaims,thegenotype,

    but

    not

    genes

    are

    being

    selected

    for

    Onthecontrary,genes/allelesarebeingselectedfor,justasDawkinsclaims

    51

    Developmentalsystems

    52

    Geneticdeterminism?

    Criticism:Dawkinsviewpresupposesgeneticdeterminism

    Geneticdeterminism:istheviewthatthephenotypeisfullydeterminedbythegenotype

    R.Gray,P.Griffiths,andothers:

    geneticdeterminismiswrong!

    Environmentalconditionsarejustasimportantasgenesintheexpressionofthephenotype!

    53

    Geneticdeterminism?

    NumberofeyesinDrosophila(wildtype)

    Normally: between700and1100(temperaturedependent!)

    Mutations

    UltrabarandInfrabar:bothconsistently lessthanthewildtype

    However: theanswertothequestionwhichmutationhasmoreeyes,UltrabarorInfrabariscontextdependent

    Temperaturetoodetermineseyenumber(notjustgenes)

    54

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    10/11

    03/05/2013

    10

    Geneticdeterminism?

    Challenge

    to

    Dawkins:

    Genesdonotdeterminethephenotype

    Thereareotherimportantfactors(e.g.environment)

    Butifgenesdonotdeterminethephenotype,andthereareotherimportantfactors,then

    .wecannotreallysaythatgenesarebeingselectedforwhencertainorganismssurviveandprocreate(andtherebyreplicategenes)

    55

    Geneticdeterminism?

    Question:

    does

    Dawkins

    really

    subscribe

    togeneticdeterminism?Whatsmore,doeshisviewreallyrequireit?

    Dawkins:

    Developmentoforganisms:Geneticcausesandenvironmentalcausesareinprinciplenodifferent.

    Evolution:Geneticfactorsreplicatethemselvesbutnongeneticfactorsdonot

    56

    Geneticdeterminism?

    Itsnottruethatonlygenesarereplicatedthroughoutgenerations

    Exampleforextragenetic inheritance:aphidBuchneraendosymbiosis

    Aphidswithout Buchnera:stuntedgrowth,reproductively sterile,dieprematurely

    MaternalBuchneramassisbeingpassedontoeggsorembryo

    Remarkablyancientsymbioticrelationship

    160 280millionyears!

    57

    Aphid=bladlus

    Geneticdeterminism?

    AphidBuchneraexamplessatisfiesDawkinsthreecriteria Longevity (sincewehaveinheritanceonan

    evolutionaryscale)

    Fecundity,andfidelity (numerousandaccuratereplication)

    Note:buchnera arenotpartofthegenetic

    programme ofaphids!

    ContrarytoDawkins:thewholedevelopmental systemisbeingreplicatedindefinitely

    58

    Aphid=bladlus

    Geneticdeterminism?

    Epigeneticinheritancethroughmethylation

    Methylgroupsblockthetranscriptionofanygenestheyareattachedto

    Normallyremovedduringzygoteformationandreestablished duringcelldivisions

    Methylationlevelisthoughttobeinfluencedbyexternalfactorslikediet

    Hence:

    Changeofgeneexpressionthroughchangeofexternalfactors

    59

    Developmentalsystems

    GriffithsandGraysconclusion:

    Theunitofselectionisnotjustthegenebut

    ratherentiredevelopmental systemswhich

    arebeingreplicated(onanevolutionary

    scale)

    Thegene isjustoneamongmanyother

    factorsdeterminingthephenotype

    Others:environment

    Hence,thegeneisnottheunitofselection

    60

  • 7/28/2019 PhilMolBio L3

    11/11

    03/05/2013

    11

    TasksandQuestions Explain

    Griffiths

    and

    Neumann

    Helds

    challengeabouttheevolutionarygene

    ExplainSobers sicklecellcounterexampleto

    Dawkinsgeneeyeview

    ExplainSterelnyandKitchers responseto

    Sober

    Explaintheideaofdevelopmentalsystems

    withregardtotheunitofselectiondebate

    61

    Lecturequery Explain

    Dawkins

    idea

    of

    the

    gene

    being

    the

    unitofselection

    Mentiontheideaofthelongevityofreplicators

    62